throbber

`
`RESEARCH
`
`© 1991 Nature Publishing Group http://www.nature.com/naturebiotechnology
`
`RESHAPING A HUMAN MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY TO
`INHIBIT HUMAN RESPIRATORY SYNcmAI. VIRUS
`INFEOION IN VNO
`•2, Patricia Bremner1
`•2, Martin Lambert2 , Geraldine Taylor3,
`Philip R. Temfest1
`Julie M. Furze , Frank J. Carr1 and William J. Harris 1
`•2 ·*
`1Scotgen Limited, 2 Tillydrone Avenue, Aberdeen AB9 2TN, Scotland, UK. 2Department of Molecular and Cell Biology,
`University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB9 !AS, Scotland, UK. 3AFRC Institute for Animal Health, Compton, Newbury, Berkshire,
`RG16 ONN , UK. *Corresponding author.
`
`We transferred the complementarity de(cid:173)
`termining regions from a murine mono(cid:173)
`clonal antibody that neutralizes infection
`by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) to a
`human IgGl monoclonal antibody. The
`resulting reshaped human antibody lost
`affinity for RSV, but an additional alter(cid:173)
`ation to one of the framework regions
`restored binding affinity and specificity.
`This second generation reshaped human
`monoclonal antibody cross-reacted with
`all clinical isolates of RSV tested and both
`prevented disease and cured mice even
`when administered four days after infec(cid:173)
`tion. We expect the antibody will prove
`useful in the management of this major
`childhood disease.
`
`R espiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the major
`
`cause of acute respiratory illness in young chil(cid:173)
`dren admitted to hospitals, and the community
`practice will treat perhaps five times the num(cid:173)
`ber of hospitalized children. It therefore causes one of the
`major childhood diseases, giving rise to annual epidemics
`of bronchiolitis and pneumonia in children throughout
`the world 1·2
`. While the majority of communit'.y-acquired
`infections resolve themselves in a week to ten days, many
`hospitalized children, especially under six months of age,
`require assisted ventilation. More severe disease may
`result in permanent damage to the lungs leading to
`pulmonary fibrosis . This can leave a child with increased
`susceptibility to chest infections such as chronic bronchitis,
`and indeed about 50% of the more seriously ill children
`go on to show recurrent bouts of wheezing in later years 3
`•
`Efforts to produce an effective vaccine have been un(cid:173)
`successful4 and the major current treatment consists of
`intensive patient management involving the use of oxygen
`
`and possibly intragastric or intravenous feeding. Recently,
`the drug ribavirin has been introduced and has shown
`efficacy5
`. However, the drug has to be administered over
`an 18-hour period by aerosol inhalation. In addition, the
`level of secondary infections following cessation of treat(cid:173)
`ment is significantly higher than in untreated patients.
`Evidence that serum therapy may protect against RSV
`infection comes from a number of sources: ( 1) infants, less
`than one month old, show a low incidence of severe
`bronchiolitis and this has been interpreted as due to
`protecting maternal antibodies6
`; (2) human intravenous
`immunoglobulin (IVIG) prepared from high titer RSV(cid:173)
`immune humans reduces nasal RSV shedding and im(cid:173)
`proves oxygenation7
`; (3) a number of animal studies have
`shown that cotton rats and monkeys are protected against
`9
`infection by passive administration of IVIG8 •
`, and mouse
`monoclonal antibodies both protect against infection 10
`and clear an established RSV infection in mice 11
`• It is
`possible then that a single i~jection of high titer neutral(cid:173)
`izing monoclonal antibody will be more acceptable to the
`clinician to protect and possibly treat the child and pre(cid:173)
`vent virus spread.
`While mouse monoclonal antibodies with high neutral(cid:173)
`izing activity could be used in human therapy, application
`is severely limited by the immune response against mouse
`protein, reduced half-life of mouse antibodies in humans
`and poor recognition of mouse antibody effector domains
`by the human immune system 12·13
`. Two genetic engineer(cid:173)
`ing techniques have been devised in an attempt to reduce
`immunogenicity. Chimaeric antibodies 14 were described
`in which the genetic information encoding the murine
`heavy and light chain variable regions are fixed to genes
`encoding the human heavy and light constant regions.
`The resulting mouse-human hybrid has about 30% of the
`intact immunoglobulin derived from murine sequences.
`In the second approach, only the genetic information for
`the hypervariable complementarity determining regions
`(CDRs) is derived from the murine antibody and trans(cid:173)
`planted in a human monoclonal antibody. With this tech(cid:173)
`nique, only about 3% of the amino acid sequence is of
`murine origin 15
`• Here we have used this CDR grafting
`technique to redesign an anti-RSV mouse monoclonal
`
`266
`
`BIO/TECHNOLCGY VOL 9
`
`rv!ARCH 1991
`
`1 of 6
`
`Celltrion, Inc., Exhibit 1070
`
`

`

`•
`
`© 1991 Nature Publishing Group http://www.nature.com/naturebiotechnology
`
`antibody as a human IgG l monoclonal antibody and
`demonstrate the ability of this reshaped antibody to pro(cid:173)
`tect and cure mice from RSV infection.
`
`RESULTS
`V region sequence analysis of murine antibody. The
`original murine monoclonal antibody was RSV19
`(lgG2a,K), specific for the fusion (F) protein of RSV. This
`antibody has been shown to neutralize RSV infection in
`vitro and protect mice (see below and E. J. Stott and G. T.,
`in preparation). Cytoplasmic RNA was prepared from
`RSV19 hybridoma cells and cDNA from the immunoglob(cid:173)
`ulin (lg) mRNA using primers specific for lg heavy chain
`variable (VH) regions and lg light chain variable regions
`(VK) (see Experimental Protocol). VH and VK cDNAs
`were then amplified using the polymerase chain reaction
`and cloned into Ml3. Amplified DNAs from two separate
`cDNA preparations were sequenced in both directions
`
`TDLE 1 Binding of anti-RSV antibodies to clinical isolates.
`Extent of Fluorescence•
`
`Isolate Number
`
`HuRSV19VHFNS/VK
`
`Murine RSV19
`
`Sutrsoup A
`818
`V795
`V0040 1
`V00214
`V00764
`V743
`V316
`V369
`Vl249
`V04692
`Vl248
`V01232
`V729
`Su~oupB
`00634
`V4715
`V00463
`V4712
`VOOl65
`V00422
`V837
`V00900
`4677
`4424
`VO I23 1
`
`++++
`+++ +
`++
`+
`++
`++
`++
`+ +++
`+++
`+++
`+
`++
`+
`
`+
`++
`+
`++
`++
`++
`+++
`++
`+++
`++
`+
`
`++++
`+ +++
`++ +
`++
`+++
`++ +
`++
`++++
`+++
`+++
`+
`++
`++
`
`++
`+ ++
`++
`+ +
`++
`++
`+++
`++
`+++
`++
`+
`
`•+, ++, +++ and + +++ refer to relative numbers of fluo(cid:173)
`~esdng cells observed and represent the proponion of cells
`infected.
`
`FIGURE 1 Deduced amino acid sequences of (a) VH and (b) VK of
`murine RSV19 antibody. CDRs are boxed. Amino acids dictated
`by the PCR primers are underlined.
`
`from at least ten independent clones. All VH clones were
`identical as were VK clones except for one unrelated
`sequence, which contained a base pair deletion and con(cid:173)
`sequently would be expected to be non-functional. The
`deduced amino acid sequences following DNA sequenc(cid:173)
`ing of clones is shown in Figure l, with CD Rs defined by
`computer assisted alignment with other VH and VK
`sequences 16
`. The VH sequence is most closely related to
`Kabat subgroup IIC and the VK to Kabat subgroup II.
`The DNA sequence has been lodged with the EMBL data
`library.
`Transplantation of CDR sequences into human frame(cid:173)
`works. The human frameworks chosen to accept the CDR
`sequences were derived from NEWM for VH and REI for
`18 and were within Ml3 based templates with irrel(cid:173)
`VK 17
`•
`evant CDRs as described by Riechmann et al. 19 Synthetic
`oligonucleotides were synthesized containing the VH and
`VK CDRs flanked by short sequences drawn from NEWM
`and REI frameworks respectively and grafted into the
`human frameworks by site-directed mutagenesis20 . The
`resulting constructs (HuRSV19VH/VK) are shown in Fig(cid:173)
`ure 2.
`Expression of reshaped antibody. The reshaped VH
`and VK genes were transferred into vectors pSVgpt
`(conferring resistance to mycophenolic acid) and pSVhyg
`(conferring resistance to hygromycin) respectively21 and
`human IgG 1 and human kappa constant regions added.
`T hese were then cotransfected into YB2/0 rat myeloma
`cells a nd mycophenolic acid resistant clones selected and
`screened for antibody production. Antibody was purified
`by protein A affinity chromatography and analyzed by
`SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions. Two polypeptides
`of approximately 55kD and 25kD, corresponding to the
`heavy and kappa chains, were visible. Such clones secrete
`intact human IgG l with yields of approximately 5 µg/ml/
`106 cells.
`Antigen binding of reshaped antibodies. Figure 3
`shows the binding of HuRSV l 9VH/VK antibody to anti(cid:173)
`gen. Levels of binding were not significantly above back(cid:173)
`ground. Comparison of VH amino acid sequences be(cid:173)
`tween murine RSV19VH (Fig. 1) and HuRSV19VH (Fig.
`2) shows that 3 out of 4 amino acid differences occur
`between amino acids 91-94. The majority of mouse and
`human VHs have arginine at position 94, which is able to
`form a salt bridge with aspartic acid at fosition 101
`contributing to the conformation of CDR3 2 . Since the
`murine RSV19VH lacks Arg94 but has AsplOl we
`thought it possible that in HuRSV19VH an Arg94-
`Aspl01 salt bridge has been imposed thereby altering the
`conformation and antigen interaction of CDR3. Accord(cid:173)
`ingly, a second generation antibody was constructed,
`the murine amino acids
`HuRSV19VHFNS/VK, with
`91-94 FCNS being used to replace the human VH frame(cid:173)
`work amino acids YCAR (Fig. 2). It can be seen from
`Figure 3 that this resulted in the restoration of substantial
`antigen-binding ability. The restored binding affinity was
`lower than that with the original murine monoclonal
`antibody though direct comparison is difficult since dif(cid:173)
`ferent conjugated antibodies were used to detect mouse
`and human immunoglobulins.
`
`(•)
`
`YK
`
`(b)
`
`VK
`
`D I 0 LT 0 SP LS LP YTL GD QA S IS C~
`L 0 E/Q S G T E L E R S C A S V K L S C T A S C
`0 Y 0
`O T L v K T o c N T v L E \v r L o K P c o s r x L L
`F N 1 K lo Y v " HI v " K o R P o o c L E w 1 c ~
`P END DY Q YAP K F Q c lK AT KT AD TS SN T
`1 v IR vs s R r s i c v Po R rs cs cs c Tor TL
`K 1 s R v E A £ o L c v v r c Ir o c s H L P R Tl r c
`I. T F E D T A v v r c N s l w G s D r D
`A y L Q L T s
`~W C 0 GT TV TVS S
`GGTKLE I
`
`BIO!ffCHNOLcx;Y VOL 9 MARCH 1991
`
`267
`
`2 of 6
`
`Celltrion, Inc., Exhibit 1070
`
`

`

`•
`
`In vitro biological activity of reshaped antibody. For
`clinical use, an antibody must recognize a high percentage
`of clinical isolates. Table I shows that the human antibody
`HuRSVl9VHFNS/VK recognizes the same broad spec(cid:173)
`trum of isolates as the original murine antibody. Inhibi(cid:173)
`tion of virus induced cell fusion in vitro is a good indicator
`of in vivo protection 10
`• Table 2 shows that the human
`antibody is effective at preventing the formation of giant
`cells associated with RSV-induced cell fusion. Moreover,
`residual giant cells in antibody treated cultures were
`smaller and had fewer nuclei per cell than in untreated
`cultures. The concentration of reshaped antibody which
`produced a 50% reduction in the number of multinucle(cid:173)
`ated giant cells (6.3 µg/ml) was equivalent to that observed
`with the original murine antibody (4.0 µg/ml).
`In vivo biological activity of reshaped antibody.
`BALB/c mice were challenRed intranasally with l 04 pfu of
`A2 strain of human RSV 1 either before or after intrana(cid:173)
`sal or intraperitoneal treatment with HuRSVl9VHFNS/(cid:173)
`VK human antibody. It can be seen from Table 3 that a
`single dose of 25 µg antibody per mouse is extremely
`effective in both prevention and treatment of RSV infec(cid:173)
`tion.
`A comparison of the ability of the original mouse
`antibody and the reshaped human antibody to clear an
`established infection in BALB/c mice, when administered
`intraperitoneally on day 4 of infection, is shown in Figure
`4. In this experiment, mice were infected with 105 pfu of
`virus, which is IO times greater than that used in the
`experiment shown in Table 3. There were no significant
`differences in the ability of the two antibodies to remove
`virus from the lungs of mice. However, with the greater
`challenge dose of virus, approximately 5 mg/kg body
`weight were required to clear the infection.
`
`© 1991 Nature Publishing Group http://www.nature.com/naturebiotechnology
`
`MuRSV19
`
`HuRSV19VHFNS/VK
`
`1.8
`
`1.6
`
`1.4
`
`1.2
`
`1.0
`
`0.8
`
`0.6
`
`0.4
`
`0.2
`
`A,1>2
`
`0.8
`
`3.1
`
`12.5
`
`50
`
`200
`
`HuRSV19VH/VK
`
`ANTIBOOY,ng
`FIGlll 3 Antigen binding by murine RSV19, HuRSV19VH/VK
`and HuRSV19VHFNS/VK antibodies measured by ELISA.
`
`DISCUSSION
`The potential uses for human monoclonal antibodies in
`diagnosis, prophylaxis and therapy were immediately
`recognized with the first isolation in 1977 of a human cell
`line secreting specific antibod y, but the development of an
`appropriate production technology has been a slow, labo(cid:173)
`26
`rious process23
`. Despite continuing research, a rou(cid:173)
`-
`tinely applicable efficient methodology for isolating hu(cid:173)
`man monoclonals by mammalian cell transformation or
`cell fusion, techniques now so well established for rodent
`monoclonal production, is still not available. As an alter(cid:173)
`native, the use of genetic engineering has allowed the
`partial conversion of rodent antibodies into mouse-hu(cid:173)
`man chimaerics 14 and the use of protein engineering now
`allows the transfer of antigen binding specificity and
`affinity from a rodent antibody into a human immuno(cid:173)
`29
`27
`globulin of any desired subtype 15
`•
`-
`•
`The seminal studies on the use of CDR grafting to
`reshape human antibodies have already demonstrated the
`ability to transfer the properties required for successful
`, inhibition of T-cell proliferation 30
`depletion of T cells 19
`and tumour imaging (M. Verhoeyen, personal communi(cid:173)
`cation). Our data has now shown that it is possible to
`produce a human monoclonal antibody with the compos(cid:173)
`ite of properties necessary for in vivo treatment of an
`infectious disease. The concentrations of human antibody
`
`TAILE 2 Inhibition of RSV induced cell fusion by reshaped
`anti-RSV antibody.
`
`Concentration of
`HuRSVl9VHFNS/VK
`(µ.g/ml)
`
`Number of
`Giant Cells*
`
`Average Number
`of Nuclei per
`Cell
`
`100
`50
`25
`12.5
`6.3
`3.1
`1.6
`0.8
`0.4
`0.2
`0 (virus only)
`0 (no virus)
`
`44
`71
`40
`67
`89
`87
`164
`201
`292
`219
`239,259
`10
`
`4.5
`4.0
`3.8
`N.D.
`N .D.
`N.D.
`N .D.
`N .D.
`N.D.
`N .D.
`14,13.5
`
`*Scored as the number of cells with 2 or more nuclei in 20 fields
`with a 25 x objective microscope lens.
`N.D., not determined.
`
`FIGUIE 2 Amino acid sequences of murine and reshaped VH and
`VK containing RSV19 CDRs. Numbering is according to Kabat et
`al.16
`
`:::".:::;:::::~tt::::: ::::::::: __ ::::::~~'.:::::::::::IT::::::
`--------PG-V-PSOTLS-T--V---T:o::_P-GR- ---- ..._ _ ____ ,.,. V--LV---K-OFS-R-S-V-AA-----F-ND~~~-------
`
`10 1
`
`9..
`
`MuRSV19VH
`
`HuRSV 19VH
`
`HuRSV19VHFNS
`
`HuRSV19VK
`
`HuRSV19VK
`
`268
`
`BIOffECHNOLOGY VOL. 9 MARCH 1991
`
`3 of 6
`
`Celltrion, Inc., Exhibit 1070
`
`

`

`•
`
`© 1991 Nature Publishing Group http://www.nature.com/naturebiotechnology
`
`required to inhibit in vitro virus-induced cell fusion and to
`treat mice in vivo (Tables 2 and 3) are equivalent to those
`needed with the original murine antibody (Fig. 4).
`Structural and computer analysis of antigen antibody
`interactions have clearly demonstrated that individual
`framework residues can be critical for correct interactions
`ofCDRs with antigen. For example, an arginine residue at
`position 94 in VH is thought to interact with the invariant
`aspartic acid residue at position 101 in the CDR22 . It is not
`surprising then that simple transplantation of the CD Rs as
`defined by Kabat from mouse to human often results in
`loss of binding affinity. This occurred with RSVl 9 (Fig. 3)
`and with several other antibodies undergoing reshaping
`
`6
`
`5
`
`~
`
`Q,
`9
`0
`!2
`
`CJ z "
`:::>
`..J
`;/;;
`w
`~ 3
`~ en
`:::>
`a:
`>
`2
`< t.7
`
`1.3
`
`1.9
`
`2.5
`
`3.1
`
`3.7
`
`43
`
`DOSE OF IG ( log,.µg/kgbody welghl )
`
`FIGUIE 4 Effects of monoclonal antibodies on growth of RSV in
`lungs. HuRSV19VHFNS/VK (e) and murine RSV19 (0) given
`intraperitoneally 4 days after intranasal inoculation of mice with
`105 pfu RSV strain A2.
`
`TAILE 3 Prevention and treatment of RSV infection in mice by
`HuRSV19VHFNS/VK antibody.
`
`Antibody Treatment
`
`Route
`
`i.p.
`
`i.n.
`
`i.p.
`
`i.n.
`
`Day*
`
`-I
`
`-1
`
`+4
`
`+4
`
`No antibody
`
`Virus
`Recovered (pfu)
`
`Log pfu/g
`lung*
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`1
`0
`1
`0
`2950
`2100
`4400
`4150
`3600
`
`<1.7
`<1.7
`<1.7
`<1.7
`<1.7
`<1.7
`<1.7
`<1.7
`<1.7
`<1.7
`<1.7
`<1.7
`<1.7
`<1.7
`<1.7
`1.7
`<1.7
`1.7
`<1.7
`4.47
`4.32
`4.64
`4.61
`4.55
`
`*-1 refers to administration of HuRSV l 9VHFNS/VK antibody I
`day prior to RSV infection, +4 refers to administration of
`antibod y 4 days post infection.
`*Virus pfu is expressed as the mean virus titre from 100 µI of
`either I 0%, I %, or 0.1 % (w/v) lung homogenates adjusted to pfu
`per gram of lung.
`
`in our laboratories. Ideally, reshaping of antibodies would
`be based upon structural data for each antigen-antibody
`interaction but this is clearly impractical. Our approach is
`to introduce ordered steps of additional alterations to
`achieve the minimal number of changes to the human
`structure necessary to restore binding affinity and speci(cid:173)
`ficity. Comparison of the amino acid sequences of the
`murine and human frameworks (Fig. 2) reveals a number
`of potential sites of framework-CDR interaction, and in
`this case, the interaction between CDR3 and its flanking
`framework residues was considered a significant struc(cid:173)
`tural variation (residues 91-94). An alternative to our
`approach3 0 involves the construction of a consensus hu(cid:173)
`man structure based upon the best homology achievable
`with the original rodent antibody sequence. Which of
`these approaches is more effective at eliminating a human
`immune response remains to be clarified.
`The projected advantages for human therapy of a
`reshaped human antibody compared with a rodent anti(cid:173)
`body are the absence of, or a considerably reduced,
`immune response allowing repeated treatment and an
`increased serum half-life, reducing the dose required and ,
`in the case of prophylactics, extending the period of
`protection provided by a single treatment. The lack of an
`immune response has now been demonstrated with re(cid:173)
`gard to one reshaped antibody constructed upon the same
`human framework used in our studies and antibody was
`still detectable in vivo eight days after administration31
`•
`These data also demonstrate the superiority in half-life
`and reduced immune response of the reshaped product
`compared to a chimaeric antibody 13
`.
`The findings that our reshaped antibody is effective
`against a wide range of clinical isolates of RSV (Table 1)
`and both protects and cures mice (Table 3) raises hope
`that it will be clinically effective, thereby offering an
`additional weapon in the management of this major
`childhood infection.
`
`EXPERIMENTAL PROTOCOL
`Materials. Murine monoclonal antibody hybridoma cell line
`RSV 19 was obtained from AFRC Institute for Animal Health,
`Compton, UK 10. Rat myeloma YB2/0 32
`, obtained from ATTC, is
`a non-lg secreting cell line and was grown in Dulbecco's modified
`Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal calf serum. Vec(cid:173)
`tors M13VHPCR1, Ml3VKPCR1 , pSVgpt and pSVhyg have
`been described in detail21 and were obtamed from G. Winter,
`MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK. Oligo(cid:173)
`nucleotides were synthesized using an Applied Biosystems 381
`DNA synthesizer. For cDNA synthesis, the primers were
`VH l FOR 5' TGAGGAGACGGTGACCGTGGTCCCTTGGC·
`CCCAG 3' ; VKJFOR 5' GTTAGATCTCCAGCTTGHGTCCC
`3' . For PCR, the additional primers were VHlBACK 5' AGGTS(cid:173)
`MARCTGCAGSAGTCWGG 3' ; VKIBACK 5' GACATTCAGC(cid:173)
`TGACCCAGTCTCCA 3'. For site-directed mutagenesis to
`transplant CDRs, the primers used were: VHCDRl 5' CTGTC(cid:173)
`TCACCCAGTGCATATAGTAGTCGCTGAAGGTGAAGCC
`AGACACGGT 3', VHCDR2 5' CATTGTCACTCTGCCCTG
`GAACTTCGGGGCATATGGAACATCATCATTCTCAGGA
`TCAATCCA 3' , VHCDR3 5' CCCTTGGCCCCAGTGGT(cid:173)
`CAAAGTCACTCCCCCATCTTGCACAATA 3', VKCDRl 5'
`CTGCTGGTACCATTCTAAATAGGTGTTTCCATCAG·
`TATGTACAAGGGTCTGACTAGATCTACAGGTGATG(cid:173)
`GTCA 3', VKCDR2 5' GCTTGGCACACCAGAAAATCGGT(cid:173)
`TGGAAACTCTGTAGATCAGCAG 3 ', VKCDR3 5'
`CCCTTGGCCGAACGTCCGAGGAAGATGTGAACCT·
`TGAAAGCAGT AGT AGGT 3'. For site-directed mutagenesis of
`the human VH framework the oligonucleotide used was 5'
`CTCCCCCATGAA TT ACAGAAATAGACCG 3'.
`Murine variable region DNA sequencing. Cyt~lasmic RNA
`was prepared as described by Favaloro et al. 3 The cDNA
`synthesis reaction consisted of 10-20 µg RNA , 0.4 µM VHlFOR
`or VKIFOR, 250 µMeach of dATP, dCTP, dGTP and dTTP, 50
`mM Tris-HCI, pH 7.5, 75 mM KC!, 10 mM DTT, 3 mM MgCl2
`and 27 units RNase inhibitor (Pharmacia) in a total volume of 50
`µI. Samples were heated at 70°C for 10 min and slowly cooled to
`42°C over a period of 30 min. Then, 100 units MML V reverse
`
`BIOITECHNOLOGY VOL 9 MARCH 1991
`
`269
`
`4 of 6
`
`Celltrion, Inc., Exhibit 1070
`
`

`

`•
`
`© 1991 Nature Publishing Group http://www.nature.com/naturebiotechnology
`
`transcriptase (BRL) was added and incubation at 42°C continued
`for 1 hour. The VH and VK cDNAs were then amplified using
`the PCR as described by Orlandi et al. 21 For PCR amplification of
`VH, DNA/primer mixtures consisted of 5 µl RNA/cDNA hybrid,
`0.5 µM VHlFOR and VHlBACK primers. For PCR amplifica(cid:173)
`tions of VK, DNA/primer mixtures consisted of 5 µI RNA/cDNA
`hybrid, 0.5 µM VHIFOR and VKlBACK primers. To these
`mixtures was added 200 µM each of dA TP, dCTP, dGTP and
`dTTP, 10 mM Tris-HCI, pH 8.3, 50 mM KC!, 1.5 mM MgCl 2 ,
`0.01% (w/v) gelatin, 0.1% (v/v) Tween 20, 0.01% (v/v) NP40 and
`2 units Taq DNA polymerase (United States Biochemicals) in a
`final volume of 50 µI. Samples were subjected to 25 thermal cycles
`of 94°C, I min; 60°C, I min; 72°C, 2 min; ending with 5 min at
`72°C. Amplified VH and VK DNA were purified on low melting
`point agarose gels, and by Elutip-d column chromatography
`(Schleicher and Schuell) and cloned into Ml3. Clones were
`sequenced by the dideoxy method using Sequenase (United
`States Biochemicals).
`Transplantation of CDRs into human frameworks. Oligonu(cid:173)
`cleotide site-directed mutagenesis was based on the method of
`Nakamaya and Eckstein20• To 5 µg of VH or VK single-stranded
`DNA in Ml3 was added a two-fold molar excess of each of the
`three VH or VK phosphorylated oligonucleotides encoding the
`mouse CDR sequences. Primers were annealed to the template by
`heating to 70°C and slowly cooled to 37°C. After site-directed
`mutagenesis, the DNA was transformed into competent E. coli
`TGl cells. Single-stranded DNA was prepared from individual
`plaques and sequenced. If only single or double mutants were
`obtained, then these were subjected to further rounds of muta(cid:173)
`genesis using the appropriate oligonucleotides until the triple
`CDR mutants were obtained.
`The CDR replaced VH and VK genes were cloned in expres(cid:173)
`sion vectors21
`to yield the plasmids termed pHuRSV19VH,
`pHuRSV19VHFNSand pHuRSVl9VK. For pHuRSV19VH and
`pHuRSV19VHFNS, the CDR replaced VH gene together with
`the lg heavy chain promoter, appropriate splice sites and signal
`peptide sequences was excised from Ml3 by digestion with
`Hindlll and BamHI, and cloned into an expression vector
`containing the murine lg heavy chain enhancer, the SV40
`promoter, the gpt gene for selection in mammalian cells and
`genes for replication and selection in E. coli. A human IgG I
`constant region34 was then added as a BamHI fragment. The
`construction of the pHuRSVI 9VK plasmid was essentially the
`same except that the gpt gene was replaced by the hygromycin
`resistance gene and a human kappa chain constant region35 was
`added.
`or
`pHuRSVl9VH
`µg
`expression. Ten
`Antibody
`pHuRSV19VHFNS and 20 µg pHuRSV19VK were linearized by
`digestion with Pvul. The DNAs were mixed together, ethanol
`precipitated and dissolved in 25 µI water. Approximately 107
`YB2/0 cells were grown to semiconftuency, harvested by centrif(cid:173)
`ugation and resuspended in 0.5 ml DMEM together with the
`digested DNA in an electroporation cuvette. After 5 min on ice,
`the cells were given a single pulse of 170V at 960 µF (Gene(cid:173)
`Pulser, Bio-Rad) and left in ice for a further 20 min. The cells
`were then put into 20 ml DMEM plus 10% fetal calf serum and
`allowed to recover for 48 hours. At this time the cells were
`distributed into a 24-well plate and selective medium applied
`(DMEM, 10% fetal calf serum, 0.8 µg/ml mycophenolic acid, 250
`µg/ml xanthine). After 3-4 days, the medium and dead cells were
`removed and replaced with fresh selective medium. Transfected
`clones were visible with the naked eye 8-10 days later.
`The presence of human antibody in the medium of wells
`containing transfected clones was measured by ELISA. Microtiter
`plate wells were coated with goat anti-human lgG (gamma chain
`specific) antibodies (Sera-Lab). After washing with PBST (phos(cid:173)
`phate buffered saline containing 0.02% Tween 20, pH 7.5), 100
`µI of culture medium from the wells containing transfectants was
`added to each microtiter well for I hour at 37°C. The wells were
`then emptied, washed with PBST and either peroxidase-conju(cid:173)
`gated goat anti-human IgG or peroxidase-conjugated goat anti(cid:173)
`human kappa constant region antibodies (Sera-Lab) were added
`and incubated at 37°C for I hour. The wells were then emptied,
`washed with PBST and substrate buffer containing o-phenylene(cid:173)
`diamine added. Reactions were stopped after a few minutes by
`the addition of sulphuric acid and absorbance at 492 nm was
`measured.
`Antigen binding assays. Humanized antibody secreted from
`transfected cell lines and the murine antibody secreted by the
`original hybridoma were purified by protein A affinity chroma(cid:173)
`tography and tested for binding to RSV in an ELISA. Antigen
`consisted of calf kidney (CK) cells infected with the A2 strain of
`
`RSV and treated with 0.5% (v/v) NP40 detergent to yield a cell
`lysate. A control cell lysate was similarly prepared using unin(cid:173)
`fected CK cells. Microtiter plate wells were blocked with PBST
`and humanized or murine anti-RSV antibody applied. After 1
`hour at 37°C wells were washed and biotinylated goat anti-human
`IgG or biotinylated goat anti-mouse IgG antibodies (Sera-Lab)
`added. After a further I hour incubation at 37°C peroxidase(cid:173)
`conjugated streptavidin (Sera-Lab) was added for 20 min at 37°C.
`The wells were washed and peroxidase substrate buffer added.
`Reactions were stopped after a few minutes by the addition of
`sulphuric acid.
`Immunofluorescence analysis of clinical isolates. Twenty-four
`clinical isolates were obtained from children during the winter of
`1983/84 by the Bristol Public Health Laboratory, UK, and repre(cid:173)
`sented both of the major subgroups of RSV. Thirteen isolates were
`serotyped as subgroup A and 11 isolates as subgroup B. HeLa or
`MAI04 cells infected with RSV isolates were grown in tissue
`culture. When the cells showed evidence of cytopathic effect, 20 ml
`0.02% (w/v) disodium EDT A in PBS and 3 ml 0.25% (w/v) trypsin
`in PBS were added and the cell suspension spotted into wells of
`PTFE-coated slides. After 3 hours at 37°C, the slides were dried
`and fixed in 80% acetone. Cells were overlaid with anti-RSV
`antibody for I hour at room temperature. After extensive wash(cid:173)
`ing, either ftuorescein-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse IgG (Nordic
`Laboratories) or ftuorescein-conjugated goat anti-human IgG I
`(Southern Biotechnology, Alabama) were added and incubation
`repeated. After further washing, cells were mounted in glycerol
`and examined under UV light.
`In vitro analysis of inhibition of virus-induced cell fusion.
`The reshaped antibody, HuRSV19VHFNS/VK was tested for
`biological activity in vitro in a fusion inhibition assay. A suspension
`of MA I 04 cells was infected with RSV at 0.1 pfu per cell. After I
`hour at 37°C, 2 ml of cells at 105/ml were distributed to glass
`coverslips in tubes. After a further 24 hours at 37°C, the culture
`medium was replaced by medium containing dilutions of re(cid:173)
`shaped antibody. Twenty-four hours later, coverslip cultures
`were fixed in methanol for 10 min and stained with May
`Grunwald stain (BDH).
`In vivo analysis of efficacy. BALB/c mice (MRC Clinical
`Research Centre, London: category 4, standard) were challenged
`intranasally with 104 pfu of the A2 strain of human RSV 37
`.
`Groups of mice were administered 25 µg of reshaped antibody
`either one day prior to virus infection or 4 days following
`infection. Administration was either by the intranasal (i.n.) or
`intraperitoneal (i.p.) routes. Five days after RSV infection, mice
`were sacrificed and lungs assa~ed for RSV pfu, on secondary CK
`cells as described previous!~ 0
`. In a second experiment, mice
`were inoculated i.n. with 10 pfu of RSV, followed 4 days later
`with various concentrations of reshaped or murine antibody
`administered i. p. and examined on day 5 of infection for the level
`of RSV in the fungs.
`Acknowledgments
`It is a pleasure to acknowledge the advice of the Scotgen
`Scientific Advisory Panel particularly G. Winter, and for gifts of
`vectors from his laboratory in the MRC Laboratory of Molecular
`Biology, Cambridge, UK. We would also like to thank E. J. Stott
`for advice on selection of RSV monoclonal antibodies and 0.
`Caul, Bristol Public Health Laboratory, for clinical isolates.
`Received 12 November 1990; accepted 2 January 1991.
`
`References
`1. Brandt, C. D., Kim, H. W., Orrobio,J. O.,Jeffries, B. C., Wood, S. C.,
`Chanock, R. M., and Parrott, R. H. I 973. Epidemiology of respiratory
`syncytial virus infection in Washington DC III. Composite analysis of
`eleven consecutive yearly epidemics. Am. J. Epidemiol. 98:355-364.
`2. Sims, D. G., Downham, M.A. P. S., McQuillin, J., and Gardner, P. S.
`I 976. Respiratory syncytial virus infection in north-east England. Br.
`Med. J. 2: 1095-1098.
`3. Bruhn, F. W. and Yeager, A.G. 1977. Respiratory syncytial virus in
`early infancy. Am. J. Dis. Child. 131:145-148.
`4. Wright, P. F., Belshe, R. B., Kim, H. W., Van Voris, L. P., and
`Chanock, R. M. 1982. Administration of a highly attenuated live
`respiratory syncytial virus vaccine to adults and children. Infect.
`Immun. 37:397-400.
`5. Conrad, D. A., Christenson,]. C., Waner,]. L., and Marks, M. I. 1987.
`Aerosolized ribavirin treatment of respiratory syncytial virus infection
`in infants hospitalised during an epidemic. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J.
`6: 152-158.
`6. Ogilvie, M. M., Vathenen, A. S., Radford, M., Codd,]., and Key, S.
`I 981. Maternal antibody and respiratory syncytial virus infection in
`infancy . .J. Med. Virol. 7:263-271.
`7. Hemming, V. G., Rodriguez, W., Kim, H. W., Brandt, C. D., Parrott,
`R.H., Burch, B., Prince, G. A., Baron, P.A., Fink, R.J., and Reaman,
`G. 1987. Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment of respiratory syn-
`
`270
`
`BIO!fECHNOLOGY VOL. 9 MARCH 1991
`
`5 of 6
`
`Celltrion, Inc., Exhibit 1070
`
`

`

`•
`
`cytial virus infections in infants and young children. Anti. Agents and
`Chemotherapy 31: 1882-1886.
`8. Hemming, V. G., Prince, G. A., Horswood, R. L., London, W. T.,
`Murphy, B. R., Walsh, E. E., Fischer, G. W., Weisman, L. E., Baron,
`P.A., and Chanock, R. M. 1985. Studies of passive immunotherapy
`for infections of respiratory syncytial virus in the respiratory tract of a
`primate model. J. Infect. Dis. 152: 1083-1087.
`9. Prince, G. A., Hemming, V. G., Horswood, R. L., and Chanock, R. M.
`1985. Immunoprophylaxis and immunotherapy of respiratory syncy(cid:173)
`tial virus infection in the cotton rat. Virus Res. 3: 193-206.
`10. Taylor, G., Stott, E.J., Bew, M., Femie, B. F., Cote, P.J., Collins,
`A. P., Hughes, M., and Jebbett,]. 1983. Monoclonal antibodies protect
`against respiratory syncytial virus infection in mice. Immunology
`52:137-142.
`11. Stott, E. J. and Taylor, G. 1989. Immune Responses, Virus Infections
`and Disease, p. 85-104. N. J. Dimmock and P. D. Minor (Eds.). I.R.L.
`Press, London.
`12. Benjamin, R. J., Cobbold, S. P., Clark, M. R., and Waldmann, H.
`1986. Tolerance of rat monoclonal antibodies: implications for sero(cid:173)
`therapy. J. Exp. Med. 163: 1539-1544.
`13. Bruggemann, M., Winter, G., Waldmann, H., and Neuberger, M.
`1989. The immunogenicity of chimeric antibodies. J. Exp. Med

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket