throbber
Monoclonal antibodies in the detection and
`therapy of micrometastatic epithelial cancers
`
`Gert Riethmuller and Judith P. Johnson
`
`Institute of Immunology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
`
`The initial promise of monoclonal antibodies as major therapeutic agents
`in human epithelial cancer has not been realized. Inaccessibility of cells
`in solid tumors due to factors such as
`the nature of the vascular
`endothelia and high pressure in the tumor are primarily responsible
`for the failure of antibody therapy. Although new strategies employing
`recombinant antibodies and immunoglobulins designed to actively engage
`the immune system may prove beneficial, micrometastatic tumor cells (at
`the stage of minimal residual disease) are likely to be the only suitable
`targets for antibody therapy. The diagnostic approaches to identify and
`characterize these cells and their use for prognosis and monitoring
`adjuvant immunotherapy is discussed.
`
`Current Opinion in Immunology 1992, 4:647--655
`
`Introduction
`
`The hope that monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), with
`their exquisite specificity and multiple effector func(cid:173)
`tions, would revolutionize the diagnosis and treatment
`of cancer, has failed to materialize. While mAbs have
`successfully replaced polyclonal antisera for the detec(cid:173)
`tion of tumor markers in the serum, their therapeutic
`use in patients with solid tumors can only be viewed as
`a disappointment, even with improvements in the ability
`of antibodies to target and destroy tumor cells in model
`systems. Thus, fundamental changes in the strategies of
`using mAbs to treat tumors are required. In this review
`we focus on several such strategies, on the one hand,
`involving new developments in antibody production and
`use, and on the other, focusing on the target of the ther(cid:173)
`apy itself. As more has been learned about the biology
`of the interaction of tumors with the vascular system and
`the extracellular matrix, it has become clear that much
`of the difficulty with passive antibody therapy is related
`to the accessibility of the tumor cells to these reagents.
`In light of this, micrometastasis, or the stage of minimal
`residual disease, may not be only an important field for
`diagnostic studies but also the best target for antibody
`mediated therapy.
`
`Monoclonal antibodies in diagnosis:
`determination of minimal residual disease
`
`The metastatic spread of small localized primary tumors
`in the absence of clinical signs of the disease in distant
`
`parts of the body can, at present, be diagnosed only in
`retrospect when the true extent of the disease manifests
`itself by an overt clinical relapse. For example, nearly 25%
`of breast cancer patients who do not show signs of dis(cid:173)
`ease in the regional lymph nodes, do in fact suffer from
`disseminated disease, borne out by the occurrence, often
`many years later, of distant metastases [ 1] . The concen(cid:173)
`tration of tumor antigens shed from a few tumor cells is
`too low for detection by the most sensitive immunoassays
`and even the most sophisticated physical diagnostic pro(cid:173)
`cedures available, including nuclear magnetic resonance
`and photon emission tomography, are not specific and
`sensitive enough to detect individual tumor cells dis(cid:173)
`seminated to distant organs. Thus, in the absence of the
`diagnosis of disseminated disease, the development of ef(cid:173)
`fective antibody-mediated (adjuvant) therapies proceeds
`at a scandalously slow pace. As with all adjuvant thera(cid:173)
`pies they must first show some efficacy in 5 year trials
`on terminal patients with a heavy tumor burden before
`they can be tested on earlier stages. It is evident that in
`this dilemma, a firm diagnosis of minimal residual disease
`would be of invaluable help to identify patients actually
`in need of adjuvant therapy. Furthermore, the monitor(cid:173)
`ing of therapeutic effects would enormously benefit the
`development of adjuvant therapies.
`Since the early years of the last decade there have
`been several attempts to use mAbs to distinguish in(cid:173)
`filtrating tumor cells from hematopoietic bone marrow
`cells [2] , an approach which was greatly expanded by
`Neville's group at the Ludwig Cancer Institute in Lon(cid:173)
`don [3]. The general feasibility of this method was
`
`Abbreviations
`ADCC-antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity; APAAP-alkaline phosphatase-anti-alkaline phosphatase;
`CH-cytotoxic T lymphocyte; Fv-single chain monoclonal antibody; H-heavy; HLA-human leukocyte antigen; L-light;
`mAb-------monoclonal antibody; MHC- major histocompatibility complex; PCR-polymerase chain reaction;
`SEA-staphylococcal enterotoxin A; TCR-T-cell receptor; V-variable.
`
`© Current Biology Ltd ISSN 0952-7915
`
`647
`
`Celltrion v. Genentech
`IPR2017-01374
`Genentech Exhibit 2059
`
`

`

`648 Cancer
`
`soon demonstrated using different mAbs in a variety
`of epithelial tumors (Table 1). Because of the gener(cid:173)
`ally low concentration and considerable heterogeneity
`of expression of tumor-associated membrane antigens,
`we chose to use the abundant intracellular cytokeratin
`proteins [ 4,5] as markers for detecting epithelial cancer
`cells in the bone marrow [ 6•• J. Using an immunocyto(cid:173)
`chemical alkaline phosphatase-anti-alkaline phosphatase
`(AP MP) detection system it is possible to detect epithe(cid:173)
`lial cells at a fequency of 10- 5 to 1 o- 6 bone marrow
`cells [7,8••,9•,10] . Patients without epithelial malignan(cid:173)
`cies essentially lack cytokeratin-positive cells [7,11], while
`between 10 and 40% of these samples exhibit staining
`with antibodies directed against the membrane antigens
`epithelial membrane antigen and human milk fat glob(cid:173)
`ule mucin [6••,12,13]. Further evidence for the specificity
`of this method was obtained from double marker stud(cid:173)
`ies using a combination of immunoautoradiography and
`APMP staining. In the bone marrow from carcinoma pa(cid:173)
`tients, the expression of the leukocyte common antigen,
`CD45 and cytokeratin 18 were never found on the same
`cell [7).
`
`Although this method appears to have a high level of
`specificity, the low frequency of tumor cells in the bone
`marrow makes it likely that they are not uniformly dis(cid:173)
`tributed and suggests that a considerable sampling error
`occurs when only one site is sampled [ 14]. In fact, triple
`site aspiration (left and right iliac crest plus sternum) in(cid:173)
`creased the percentage of positive stage M0 breast cancer
`patients from 10.7% to 28.2% [15] (M denotes distant
`metastases and M0 refers to tumors where there is no
`evidence of distant metastases). For routine purposes, a
`two-sided aspiration of the pelvic crest is currently per(cid:173)
`formed on the operating table, immediately prior to the
`operation.
`
`The judicious use of double staining techniques allows
`one to define additional markers on the individual dis(cid:173)
`seminated cells. Thus cytokeratin-positive cells in the
`bone marrow of tumor patients were shown to ex(cid:173)
`press proliferation-associated molecules such as the the
`Ki 67 nuclear antigen and receptors for transferrin and
`epidermal growth factor [ 15]. Similar to cells in the
`metastatic lesions themselves, c.ytokeratin-positive bone
`marrow cells also often lacked HIA class I expression. In
`one study, 50% of the breast cancer patients with positive
`tumor cells in the bone marrow had only class I nega(cid:173)
`tive epithelial cells in the bone marrow [ 8••]. These cells
`not only express proliferation-assrx:iated markers but are
`able to grow in vitro. Epithelial cells could be expanded
`from bone marrow aspirates by the use of various combi(cid:173)
`nations of growth factors [16] and the rate of successful
`expansions was substantially increased when the culture
`vessels were precoated with extracellular matrix proteins.
`Using a serum free culture system, Hay et al [ 17) re(cid:173)
`cently reported the growth of small-cell lung cancer cells
`in 100% of positive bone marrow samples.
`
`What is the clinical significance of the presence of epi(cid:173)
`thelial cells in the bone marrow? In a number of studies
`on breast carcinoma patients [ 14,18••] as well as in colo(cid:173)
`rectal cancer [19] and neuroblastoma [20], the presence
`of micrometastases in the bone marrow has now been
`shown to be associated with a shorter disease-free in(cid:173)
`terval. Surprisingly, while bone marrow micrometastatic
`cells were found in 33% of the colorectal tumor pa(cid:173)
`tients (Dukes C stage, i.e. a trans-serosal tumor with
`regional lymph node involvement), most of the man(cid:173)
`ifest metastases involved the liver, indicating that the
`presence of tumor cells in the bone marrow is associ(cid:173)
`ated with the probability of metastases development in
`general, and not necessarily with the manifestation of
`
`Table 1. Detection of bone marrow micrometastasis in various types of epithelial cancer.
`
`Origin of tumor
`
`Marker antigens
`
`Correlation with established
`risk factors
`
`Prognostic
`value
`
`References
`
`Breast
`
`Colorectum
`
`Stomach
`Prostate
`
`Small-cell lung
`cancer
`Non-small-cell
`lung cancer
`Bladder
`Renal cell
`carcinoma
`
`Epithelial membrane antigen (EMA)
`Cytokeratin
`MBr1
`Cytokeratin
`17.1A
`Cytokeratin
`Cytokeratin
`PSA + Cytokeratin + EMA
`Cytokeratin
`SM1
`LCA1, LCA2, and LCA3
`Cytokeratin
`
`Cytokeratin
`Cytokeratin
`
`'(Unpublished data); n.t., not tested.
`
`+
`+
`-
`+
`
`+
`+
`+
`+
`+
`+
`+
`
`+
`+
`
`+
`n.t.
`n.t.
`n.t.
`
`+
`+
`n.t.
`+
`n.t.
`n.t.
`+
`
`n.t.
`n.t .
`
`[14]
`[71
`157]
`118••]
`
`[19)
`16 .. ]
`172]
`Oberneder'
`[58]
`159]
`Pantel'
`
`Oberneder'
`Oberneder'
`
`

`

`Monoclonal antibodies and epithelial cancer Riethmuller and Johnson
`
`649
`
`skeletal metastasis. Taking all of the published studies
`together, a good correlation exists between the presence
`of epithelial cells in bone marrow and the conventional
`risk factors based mainly on the extent of tumor dissem(cid:173)
`ination. Furthermore, the total tumor burden may be es(cid:173)
`timated from the number of epithelial cells in the bone
`marrow [18 00,20]. The evaluation of tumor cells in the
`bone marrow is, therefore, a potentially powerful diag(cid:173)
`nostic tool since it allows one to look at a part of the
`tumor burden which the surgeon has left behind. Not
`only could this provide a way to monitor the effective(cid:173)
`ness of various therapies, but with a further characteri(cid:173)
`zation of these cells ( oncogene, tumor suppressor gene
`expression, etc) it may eventually be possible to more
`accurately predict the metastatic potential of these cells.
`
`Monoclonal antibodies in therapy: new
`strategies for production and use
`
`Although passive antibody therapies have been effective
`against established tumors in many experimental sys(cid:173)
`tems, the therapy of solid tumors with mAbs in the
`clinic has had a history of failure. A brief look at the
`literature covering the years of 1984-1991 provides no
`hint of a consistent therapeutic efficacy of mAbs. In a re
`view of 12 studies comprising 196 patients with a variety
`of solid tumors, Gisler lists only two complete remissions
`(Table 2) and the number of partial remissions remains
`within the realm of the anecdotal (R Grisler, in Can(cid:173)
`cer and the Immune System, Proceedings of European
`School of Oncology, Venice 1990). The general conclu(cid:173)
`sion that has been drawn from this conspicuous failure
`is that antibodies as naked mouse immunoglobulins are
`
`inefficient, and a number of new strategies are being un(cid:173)
`dertaken to create new antibodies and to use mAbs to
`actively engage the host's own immune response against
`the autologous tumor.
`
`The development of new reagents that react with tumors
`through recombinant DNA technology
`While emphasis in recent years has been on using genetic
`engineering to 'humanize' and 'Fe customize' rodent an(cid:173)
`tibodies, the future almost certainly lies in the production
`of human antigen-binding molecules from combinatorial
`libraries in Eschericha coli [21]. In this method, indepen(cid:173)
`dent cDNA libraries are created from the mRNA'> encod(cid:173)
`ing variable (V) light (L) and heavy (H) chain antibody re
`gions, using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). These
`two libraries are then randomly combined and cloned
`into a phage vector which directs the expression of one
`VL and one VH polypeptide chain. The use of vectors
`which allow the Fab fragments to be expressed as in(cid:173)
`tact antigen-binding sites on the phage surface, either
`in monomeric or multimeric form, have greatly facili(cid:173)
`tated screening and selection of desired antibodies [ 22•].
`In addition, the most recent developments indicate that
`high affinity antibodies of virtually any specificity can be
`obtained by applying rounds of random mutagenesis and
`selection to the Fabs produced from the cDNA of naive
`IgM + B lymphocytes, a situation which should obviate
`the need for immune donor cells [23••].
`Once the desired antigen-binding moieties have been se(cid:173)
`lected, the VL and VH regions can be produced as a sin(cid:173)
`gle polypeptide ( with the regions separated by a flexible
`linker) to generate single chain mAbs or Fv molecules.
`These can be further engineered to contain toxins or
`
`Table 2. Mouse monoclonal antibodies in clinical trials on solid tumors.
`
`Tumor
`
`Mouse antibody
`
`lsotype
`
`Number of
`patients
`
`Effect
`
`References
`
`Gastrointenstinal
`tumors
`
`Breast, colon,
`ovarian and
`lung cancer
`
`Pancreatic
`adenocarcinoma
`
`Neuroblastoma,
`melanoma
`
`Melanoma
`
`Melanoma
`
`C017-1A
`
`lgG2a
`
`L6
`
`lgG2a
`
`BW494
`C017-1A
`
`3F8
`anti-GD2
`
`9.2.27
`
`R24 (anti-GD3)
`
`lgG1
`lgG2a
`
`lgG3
`
`lgG2a
`
`lgG3
`
`20
`22
`8
`20
`19
`
`18
`19
`
`17
`
`20
`
`21
`12
`
`20±
`22±
`8-
`20±
`1++,18?
`
`18-
`4+, 15-
`
`1++,6+,10-
`
`20-
`
`4+, 17
`3+, 2±, 7-
`
`[60]
`[61]
`[62]
`[63]
`[64]
`
`[65]
`[66]
`
`[67]
`
`[68,69]
`
`[70]
`[71]
`
`+ +, Complete response; +, partial response; ±, minor response; -, no response.
`
`

`

`650 Cancer
`
`other effector domains [ 24••]. Fvs frequently refold into
`a conformation that retains the binding characteristics of
`the divalent mAb and may penetrate tissues much more
`efficiently than intact immunoglobulins. Such characteris(cid:173)
`tics can be used to predict whether they will be important
`anti-tumor reagents and their preliminary use in mouse
`models confirms this [25] .
`
`Use of monoclonal antibodies to engage the
`host's immune system
`
`The passive administration of tumor-reactive mAbs
`is increasingly being replaced by immunotherapeutic
`schemes designed to engage the host's own immune sys(cid:173)
`tem in the destruction of the autologous tumor. Among
`the most widely used strategies at present is the attempt
`to exploit the idiotypic network [ 26 .. ,27• ,28• J. This ap(cid:173)
`proach is based on the theory that certain anti-idiotypic
`antibodies (the Ab2Ps) will express the internal image
`of the original immunizing epitope [29]. Treatment with
`such antibodies is, therefore, equivalent to immunizing
`patients with the tumor antigen, or rather with a sin(cid:173)
`gle epitope of this antigen. In point of fact, patients
`treated with Ab2s frequently produce Ab3s which re(cid:173)
`act with the original tumor antigen [30,31,32•] and in
`some cases, even appear to develop a cellular reactivity
`against this antigen although the nature of this reactiv(cid:173)
`ity remains poorly characterized [30,33,34] .The clinical
`consequences of active immunization in those instances
`where the tumor associated antigen, e.g. the 17.1 A colo(cid:173)
`rectal carcinoma epithelial antigen, is also widely ex(cid:173)
`pressed on normal epithelia are unclear.
`
`Despite the common production of Ab3s that react with
`tumor cells in the anti-idiotype treated patients, these
`clinical trials have generally not been any more successful
`than those using Abls, antibodies to the original epitope,
`[27• ,28• ] . However, Mittelman et al. [32•], recently re(cid:173)
`ported a significant increase in survival time in melanoma
`patients producing Ab3s against the chondroitin sul(cid:173)
`phate proteoglycan, a surface antigen of melanoma cells.
`This result could not be accounted for by higher gen(cid:173)
`eral immune reactivity (i.e. performance status) of the
`patients. While such discrepant results may reflect, in
`part, the fact that immunization with these reagents in(cid:173)
`duces an immune response against a single epitope that
`may have varying functional and structural characteristics
`(e.g. density, sensitivity to modulation, functional signif(cid:173)
`icance), studies in a mouse anti-tumor model (reviewed
`in [26 .. J) indicate that selection of the Ab2, used in such
`trials is of critical importance. In this system, four differ(cid:173)
`ent Ab2s, which were very similar in their interaction with
`the Abl and in their ability to induce anti-tumor antigen
`humoral and cellular responses, were examined for their
`ability to vaccinate against tumor growth. Only one Ab2
`was able to induce protective immunity; more disturb(cid:173)
`ing was the observation that one actually appeared to
`potentiate tumor growth (35]. The finding of a linear
`seyuence homology between the second hypervariable
`region of the protective Ab2 L chain and the tumor anti·
`
`gen [ 26 .. J, not only suggests a molecular basis for the
`similarity between the internal image and the tumor anti(cid:173)
`gen, but means that selection of appropriate Ab2s may
`eventually he possible through sequence comparison of
`the antibody variable regions with the sequence of the
`antigen. However, this is not possible for carbohydrate
`antigens that are among the best candidates for tumor
`surrogate antigen vaccines given their effectiveness as tu(cid:173)
`mor target structures [ 36• J . This would be cumbersome
`enough for protein antigens, but it would be even more
`difficult for carbohydrate antigens because of the diffi(cid:173)
`culty of producing them in large quantities; despite this,
`the effectiveness of carbohydrate antigens as tumor target
`structures means that they are among the best candidates
`for surrogate antigen vaccines [36•].
`
`A conceptually simpler approach to engage the host
`immune system is the use of bi-specific antibodies to
`target host effector cells to the tumor. These reagents
`combine, in a single molecule, specificity for a tumor
`associated antigen with specificity for an effector cell
`molecule, most commonly the T-cell receptor (TCR)·
`associated CD3 complex (37,38]. Addition of such con(cid:173)
`jugates to interleukin-2- or anti-CD3-activated leukocytes
`prior to their injection reduces the growth of established
`tumors in nude mice more effectively than the activated
`cells alone [39] , a result which was also obtained in a
`small clinical trial [ 40 J. Most cells that are targeted to the
`tumor by this approach are not directed against tumor
`antigens. But bi-specific heteroconjugates can also in(cid:173)
`crease the killing of autologous tumors by clones of
`tumor-specific tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and cyto(cid:173)
`toxic T lymphocytes (CTL<i) provided the tumor cells
`express the target antigens [ 41 •]. However, if the tu·
`mars are negative or heterogeneous for target-antigen
`expression, the presence of heteroconjugates can inhibit
`tumor-specific cytotoxicity, presumably by blocking the
`TCR. Given the universality of tumor cell heterogeneity,
`this could he a serious drawback to the successful use
`of such reagents.
`
`..
`An approach which might overcome this problem is one
`which takes advantage of the characteristics of bacterial
`toxin superantigens [ 42]. These molecules bind with
`high affinity to MHC class II antigens and once bound,
`demonstrate a specificity for particular families of TCR vp
`chains. Reactivity with the TCR leads to T-cell activation,
`cytokine release and killing of the cell expressing MHC
`class II antigen. By coupling a colon carcinoma reactive
`mAb to staphylococcal enterotoxin A (SEA), Dohlstein et
`al, [ 43•• J have been ahle to replace class II dependent
`T°-cell activation with a tumor antigen specific T-cell acti(cid:173)
`vaJ:ion and have achieved killing of carcinoma cell lines by
`CTLs bearing the appropriate V~ chains. Since SEA will
`not engage the T cell until it is 'presented' by mAb bind(cid:173)
`ing, activation of the T cells and cytokine release should
`occur only locally, in the immediate environment of the
`tumor cells. Thus, like the use of cytokine transfected tu(cid:173)
`mor cell vaccines [ 44] , which also lead to spatially and
`temporally concordant expression of tumor antigens and
`cytokines, SEA- mAh conjugates may also trigger develop·
`ment of the host's own anti-tumor response.
`
`

`

`Monoclonal antibodies and epithelial cancer Riethmuller and Johnson
`
`651
`
`Micrometastatic tumor cells as targets for
`immunotherapy: the way to secondary
`prevention
`
`Even in the face of major improvements in the ability of
`antibodies to bind to and kill tumor cells, the problem
`of the accessibility of the tumor cells to these reagents
`remains unresolved. In fact, recent data on the microcir(cid:173)
`culation and extracellular matrix of tumors indicate that
`this may in fact be the most important impediment to
`successful antibody treatment of solid tumors [ 45,46].
`
`The organization of the tumor's vascular system is largely
`determined by the histogenic type of tumor (i.e. tissue
`of origin), its differentiation state, proliferation rate and
`location. The non-fenestrated capillaries often found in
`epithelial tumors prevent antibodies from entering the tu(cid:173)
`mor tissue. Another major factor obviating the transcapil(cid:173)
`lary transport of macromolecules is the tumor interstitial
`pressure which is generally much higher than the sur(cid:173)
`rounding normal tissue and which increases with tumor
`size [ 47]. The pressure gradient from the center to the
`periphery of a tumor leads to an outward convection of
`the interstitial fluid so that extravasated mAb will be trans(cid:173)
`ported to the periphery of the tumor. In the interstitium
`itself, the dense network of glycosaminoglycans presents
`a formidable obstacle for free diffusion of antibody. In
`addition, the antigens shed from the tumor, when immo(cid:173)
`bilized in this interstitium, may neutralize antibodies and
`lead to precipitation of antigen-antibody complexes. A fi(cid:173)
`nal barrier that must be overcome in differentiated metas(cid:173)
`tases of adenocarcinomas is the shielding of target anti(cid:173)
`gens from diffusing antibodies by the intercellular tight
`junctions.
`
`While the clinical trials have only resulted in a very few
`well documented antibody-induced regressions ( which
`may more easily be explained by derangements in the
`tumor vasculature or extracellular matrix rather than by
`the inherent characteristics of the antibody), they have
`clearly shown that antibody therapy is remarkably free of
`toxicity and serious side effects. Thus, the stage would
`now seem to be set for applying passive antibody ther(cid:173)
`apy to ils most logical target - minimal residual disease
`(or micrometastasis), a state which applies to 1/3 to 1/2
`of patients with epithelial cancer (the most common type
`of cancer), following (curative) radical surgery of the pri(cid:173)
`mary lesion.
`
`One of the first hints that micrometastatic cells might be
`particularly suitable targets for passively administered an(cid:173)
`tibody was provided by Schlimok et al. [7] who demon(cid:173)
`strated that tumor cells in bone marrow of patients
`with colorectal cancer can be labelled with mouse im(cid:173)
`munoglobulin in vivo. In a later report [8 .. ], the ther(cid:173)
`apeutic effects of antibody infusions over a period of
`several months up to 2 years were monitored by im(cid:173)
`munocytochemical analysis of bone marrow. In 12 of
`the 23 Dukes C patients with clinically manifest metas(cid:173)
`tases, micrometastatic cells were repeatedly identified and
`clinical relapse occurred in nine of these patients.
`
`In order to monitor directly the therapeutic elimina(cid:173)
`tion of micrometastatic cells, patients with high num-
`
`bers of micrometastatic cells in the bone marrow were
`treated with an IgG3 anti-Lewis Y antibody displaying
`high complement-dependent cytotoxicity [ 48•]. (This an(cid:173)
`tibody was selected because IgG3 mouse antibodies are
`particularly effective in the activation of human comple(cid:173)
`ment and ADCC). While no regressions were observed
`in these patients with extensive metastatic disease, a dra(cid:173)
`matic decrease in the number of tumor cells in bone
`marrow was observed, an effect not seen in placebo
`treated patients ( G Schlimok, G Riethmi.iller, K Pante! et
`al., abstract 709, ProcAm Soc Clin One 1991, 10:212). To
`analyze the efficacy of antibodies against micrometastatic
`cells in colorectal cancer a prospective randomized trial
`was initiated into which only patients with regional dis(cid:173)
`ease (Dukes Cl and C2; metastases in 1-3 regional lymph
`nodes and 4 or more, respectively) were recruited. The
`trial comprising a total of 176 patients in a treatment and
`control arm will be closed at the end of 1992 with a me(cid:173)
`dian observation time of 5 years. A preliminary analysis at
`a median observation time 4.5 years indicates differences
`between treated and control patients in terms of overall
`survival and recurrence rate of distant metastasis ( G Ri
`ethmi.iller, G Schlimok et al., unpublished data). Although
`another prospective randomized trial on pancreatic can(cid:173)
`cer patients treated with an anti-carbohydrate antibody
`failed to show therapeutic effects [ 49••], the state of
`minimal residual disease in these patients can be dis(cid:173)
`puted as the partial pancreato-duodenectomy (removal
`of the pancreas and duodenum) employed for tumor re(cid:173)
`section may not have been complete in many of them.
`
`Conclusions and perspectives
`
`While it is clear that a major consideration for the suc(cid:173)
`cessful application of antibody therapy in solid tumors
`is the accessibility of the tumor cells, other aspects also
`need to be taken into account. Heterogeneity of tumor
`cells is the major obstacle of any antigen-targeting ther(cid:173)
`apy. To cope with antigen heterogeneity, which increases
`with tumor progression, a carefully selected combination
`of antibodies directed to independently controlled mem(cid:173)
`brane antigens should be applied as early as possible,
`i.e. immediately after the removal of the primary tumor.
`Published data demonstrate that selected pairs of anti(cid:173)
`bodies directed against different epitopes of a particular
`antigen exhibit up to a 100-fold synergistic increase in
`cell killing in vitro [ 50] or in vivo [ 51] or result in
`augmented binding [52-54]. A<; passive antibody ther(cid:173)
`apy imitates a natural effector mechanism, a well defined
`oligoclonal combination of antibodies, in which each has
`been shown to eliminate micrometastatic cells, should be
`as acceptable for clinical use as current registered poly(cid:173)
`clonal anti-thymocyte globulin preparations.
`
`The optimal combination of such antibodies would con(cid:173)
`sist of human or 'humanized' immunoglobulins. Since
`normal epithelia are less accessible to cytotoxic anti(cid:173)
`bodies (they are located behind a dense basal mem(cid:173)
`brane which is quasi-impermeable to non-secretory im(cid:173)
`munoglobulin), an absolute specificity for therapeutic an(cid:173)
`tibodies appears less critical. Indeed, toxicity to normal
`epithelia has been negligible in the trials reported thus
`far. Although the inactivation of complement by homo!-
`
`

`

`652 Cancer
`
`ogous restriction factors may contribute to the resistance
`of the tumor cells to lysis, it may be possible to eventually
`inhibit these factors (e.g., CS-binding protein or CD59
`membrane glycoprotein) [55). As demonstrated by sev(cid:173)
`eral studies [7] micrometastatic cells can be reproducibly
`identified in individual patients over time, thus offering
`a new way to monitor micrometastasis. Such monitoring
`will be mandatory for the expeditious development of
`an effective passive antibody therapy. Furthermore, new
`techniques such as PCR may replace the more laborious
`immunocytological methods [ 56] .
`
`In conclusion, it would be a major mistake to let anti(cid:173)
`bodies, exquisitely specific and versatile tools, and the
`powerful natural effector mechanisms they can harness
`be misspent on the unsuitable target of advanced solid
`tumors
`
`Acknowledgements
`
`The authors are supported by Dr. Mildred Scheel Stiftung, Deutsche
`Krebshilfe, Bonn, Germany. The authors would like to thank Dr.
`Klaus Pante! for helpful discussion.
`
`References and recommended reading
`
`Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of re(cid:173)
`view, have been highlighted as:
`of special interest
`of outstanding interest
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`BAUM M: The Curability of Breast Cancer. In Breast Can(cid:173)
`cer Management. Edited by Stall BA. London: Heinemann;
`1977:3-13.
`
`KEMSHEAD JT, WAI.'iCH F, PRITCHARD J, GREAVES M: Mono(cid:173)
`clonal Antibody to Ganglioside GQ Discriminates between
`Haemopoietic Cells and Infiltrating Neuroblastoma Cells in
`Bone Marrow. Int J Cancer 1981, 27:447--452.
`
`DEARNAI.EY DP, SLOANE JP, ORMEROD MG, STEEI.E K, COOMBES
`RO, CUNK HMO, POWLES TJ, FORD HT, GAZET JC, NEV1I.LE AM:
`Increased Detection of Mammary Carcinoma Cells in Mar(cid:173)
`row Smears Using Antisera to Epithelial Membrane Antigen.
`Br J Cancer 1983, 44:85-90.
`
`Mou R, FRANKE WW, SCHIil.ER DL, GEIGER B, KREPLER R: The
`Catalogue of Human Cytokeratins: Pattern of Expression
`in Normal Epithelia, Tumors and Cultured Cells. Cell 1982,
`31:11-24.
`
`DEBUS E, WEBER K, OSBORN M: Monoclonal Cytokeratin An(cid:173)
`tibodies that Distinguish Simple from Stratified Squamous
`Epithelia: Characterization on Human Tissues. EMBO J 1982,
`1:1641-1647
`
`6.
`••
`
`SCHLIMOK G, FUNKE I, PANTEL K, STROBEL F, LINDEMANN F,
`WITTE J, RIETHMOI.I.ER G: Micrometastatic Tumor Cells in
`Bone Marrow of Patients with Gastric Cancer: Methodologi(cid:173)
`cal Aspects of Detection and Prognostic Significance. Eur
`] Cancer 1991, 27:1461-1465.
`By comparing the specificity and sensitivity of antibodies to various
`membrane and cytoplasmic (cytokeratin) antigens the superiority of
`anti-cytokeratin antibodies in distinguishing infiltrating epithelial can(cid:173)
`cer cells from hematopoietic bone marrow cells is demonstrated. In
`gastric cancer, the incidence of micrometastatic cells correlates with
`conventional risk parameters such as the tumor size, the stage of dif(cid:173)
`ferentiation and the presence or absence of metastases, and thus also
`with disea5e-free survival time.
`
`7.
`
`SCHLIMOK G, FUNKE I, HOU.MANN B, G0TTLINGER H, SCHMIDT
`G, HAUSER H, SWIERKOT S, WARNECKE HH, SCIINEIDER B,
`KOPROWSKI H, RIETHM0Il.ER G: Micrometastatic Cancer Cells
`
`· in Bone Marrow: in Vitro Detection with Anti-cytokeratin
`and in Vivo Labelling with Anti-17- lA Monoclonal Antibod(cid:173)
`ies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1987, 84:8672-8676.
`
`8.
`
`PANTEL K, SCHUMOK G, KUTTER D, SCHAUER G, GENZ T,
`WIEBECKE B, BACKMANN R, FUNKE I, RIETHMOU.ER G: Frequent
`Down Regulation of Major Histocompatibility Class I Anti(cid:173)
`gen Expression on Individual Micrometastatic Carcinoma
`Cells. Cancer Res 1991, 51:4712-4715.
`This study of HIA class I expression reveals an unexpectedly frequent
`loss of class I antigen by individual micrometastatic cells in breast, colo(cid:173)
`rectal and gastric cancer. For future therapies aimed at recruitment of
`CTI.s this is an important observation to consider.
`
`9.
`
`MOLINO A, COLOMBATTI M, BONETTI F, 2.ARDINI M, PASINI F,
`PERINI A, PELOSI G, TTIDENTE G, VENERI D, CETTO GL: A
`Comparative Analysis of Three Different Techniques for the
`Detection of Breast Cancer Cells in Bone Marrow. Cancer
`1991, 67:1033-1036
`A methodical paper demonstrating the higher sensitivity of the APAAP(cid:173)
`immunocytochemical method over imrnunofluorescence and conven(cid:173)
`tional immunocytological methods by detecting epithelial cells in nu(cid:173)
`cleated bone marrow cells.
`OSBORNE MP, WONG GY, ASINA S, OW LJ, COTE RJ, ROSEN
`P: Sensitivity of Immunocytochemical Detection of Breast
`Cancer Cells in Human Bone Marrow. Cancer Res 1991,
`51 :270&--2709.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`12.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
`SCHUMOK G, SWIERKOT S, HAUSER H, JUNKER A, WARNECKE HH,
`RIETHMDU.ER G: Detection of Bone-marrow Micrometastases
`Using Monoclonal Antibodies. Blut 1985, 51:203.
`
`DEh'iOL G,

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket