`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`Paper 34
`Entered: February 7, 2018
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`CELLTRION, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`GENENTECH, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-01373 (Patent 6,407,213 B1)
`Case IPR2017-01374 (Patent 6,407,213 B1)1
`____________
`
`
`Before SHERIDAN K. SNEDDEN, ZHENYU YANG, and
`ROBERT A. POLLOCK, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`YANG, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`DECISION
`Patent Owner’s Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission of
`Andrew Danford, Robert J. Gunther, Jr., Daralyn J. Durie,
`Lisa J. Pirozzolo, and Kevin S. Prussia
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 This order addresses issues that are common to each referenced case. We,
`therefore, issue a single order that has been entered in each case. For convenience,
`paper numbers refer to those filed in IPR2017-01373.
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01373 (Patent 6,407,213 B1)
`IPR2017-01374 (Patent 6,407,213 B1)
`
`Patent Owner filed motions for pro hac vice admission of Andrew Danford
`(Paper 28), Robert J. Gunther, Jr. (Paper 24), Daralyn J. Durie (Paper 25), Lisa J.
`Pirozzolo (Paper 27), and Kevin S. Prussia (Paper 26). The motions are supported
`by the declarations of Mr. Danford (Ex. 2036), Mr. Gunther (Ex. 2032), Ms. Durie
`(Ex. 2033), Ms. Pirozzolo (Ex. 2034), and Mr. Prussia (Ex. 2035), respectively.
`On page one of each motion, Patent Owner states that Petitioner does not oppose
`the motion.
`The Board has reviewed the submissions and determined that the
`requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 42.10 have been met and there is good cause to admit
`Mr. Danford, Mr. Gunther, Ms. Durie, Ms. Pirozzolo, and Mr. Prussia pro hac
`vice.
`
`
`It is, therefore,
`
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s motions for admission of Andrew Danford,
`Robert J. Gunther, Jr., Daralyn J. Durie, Lisa J. Pirozzolo, and Kevin S. Prussia pro
`hac vice are granted;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Danford, Mr. Gunther, Ms. Durie,
`Ms. Pirozzolo, and Mr. Prussia are authorized to represent Patent Owner only as
`back-up counsel in the instant proceedings;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is to continue to have a registered
`practitioner represent it as lead counsel for the instant proceedings;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Danford, Mr. Gunther, Ms. Durie,
`Ms. Pirozzolo, and Mr. Prussia shall comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
` 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01373 (Patent 6,407,213 B1)
`IPR2017-01374 (Patent 6,407,213 B1)
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of the
`C.F.R.; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Danford, Mr. Gunther, Ms. Durie,
`Ms. Pirozzolo, and Mr. Prussia shall be subject to the Office’s disciplinary
`jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a) and the Office’s Rules of Professional
`Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101-11.901.
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Cynthia Hardman
`Robert V. Cerwinski
`GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
`chardman@goodwinlaw.com
`rcerwinski@goodwinlaw.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`David L. Cavanaugh
`Rebecca A. Whitfield
`Robert Gunther
`Lisa Pirozzolo
`Kevin Prussia
`Andrew J. Danford
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP
`david.cavanaugh@wilmerhale.com
`rebecca.whitfield@wilmerhale.com
`Robert.Gunther@wilmerhale.com
`Lisa.Pirozzolo@wilmerhale.com
`Kevin.Prussia@wilmerhale.com
`Andrew.Danford@wilmerhale.com
`
`
`
`
` 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01373 (Patent 6,407,213 B1)
`IPR2017-01374 (Patent 6,407,213 B1)
`
`
`
`
`Adam R. Brausa
`Daralyn Durie
`DURIE TANGRI LLP
`abrausa@durietangri.com
`ddurie@durietangri.com
`
`
` 4
`
`
`
`
`
`