`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`Celltrion, Inc.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`Genentech, Inc.
`Patent Owner
`
`Patent No. 6,407,213
`
`
`Inter Partes Review No. IPR2017-01373
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL HEARING
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), the Board’s Scheduling Order (IPR2017-
`
`01373, Paper 15, and IPR2017-01374, Paper 16), and the Parties Joint Notice of
`
`Stipulation to Revise Schedule (IPR2017-01373, Paper 57, and IPR2017-01374,
`
`Paper 56), Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board conduct a consolidated
`
`oral argument in Inter Partes Review Nos. IPR2017-01373 and IPR2017-01374,
`
`currently scheduled for both cases on July 16, 2018. (See IPR2017-01373, Paper
`
`33, and IPR2017-01374, Paper 32.)
`
`In view of the consolidated IPRs, Petitioner requests one hour and thirty
`
`minutes at the oral hearing to address U.S. Patent No. 6,407,213 or, to the extent
`
`greater, the amount of time granted to Patent Owner. Petitioner requests the
`
`opportunity to reserve a portion of its time for rebuttal. Petitioner intends to argue
`
`the following issues:
`
`1. Any issues addressed by Petitioner, including in the Petition for Inter
`
`Partes Review and Reply;
`
`2. Any issues properly raised by Patent Owner, including in the Patent
`
`Owner’s Response;
`
`3. Rebuttal to issues raised by Patent Owner;
`
`4. Petitioner’s Motion to Exclude Evidence;
`
`5. Any Motions to Exclude Evidence by Patent Owner;
`
`6. Any issues properly raised in Patent Owner’s Request for Oral
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Argument;
`
`7. Any issues properly raised in Patent Owner’s Motion to Strike New
`
`Reply Materials and Petitioner’s response thereto;
`
`8. Any additional issues the parties raise or propose to raise at or before the
`
`oral argument; and
`
`9. Any additional issues on which the Board seeks information or
`
`clarification.
`
`Petitioner requests the ability to use audio-visual equipment to display
`
`demonstratives and exhibits, including the use of a computer-connected projector,
`
`an ELMO projector, and a screen.
`
`
`
`Dated: June 22, 2018
`
`
`By: /Cynthia Lambert Hardman/
`Cynthia Lambert Hardman (Reg. No. 53,179)
`Elizabeth J. Holland (Reg. No. 47,657)
`Robert V. Cerwinski (admitted pro hac vice)
`Linnea P. Cipriano (Reg. No. 67,729)
`GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
`The New York Times Building
`620 Eighth Avenue
`New York, NY 10018
`(212) 813-8800 (telephone)
`(212) 355-3333 (facsimile)
`
`Sarah J. Fischer (Reg. No. 74,104)
`GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
`100 Northern Avenue
`Boston, MA, 02210
`(617) 570-3908 (telephone)
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`(617) 801-8991 (facsimile)
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), I certify that on this 22nd day of June, 2018,
`
`I caused to be served a copy of this PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL
`
`HEARING by email on the lead and back up counsel for Patent Owner at:
`
`David Cavanaugh (David.Cavanaugh@wilmerhale.com)
`
`Lauren V. Blakely (lauren.blakely@wilmerhale.com)
`
`Robert Gunther (Robert.Gunther@wilmerhale.com)
`
`Adam Brausa (abrausa@durietangri.com)
`
`Daralyn Durie (ddurie@durietangri.com)
`
`Andrew Danford (Andrew.Danford@wilmerhale.com)
`
`Lisa Pirozzolo (Lisa.Pirozzolo@wilmerhale.com)
`
`Kevin Prussia (Kevin.Prussia@wilmerhale.com)
`
`
`/Cynthia Lambert Hardman/
`
`Cynthia Lambert Hardman (Reg. No.
`53,179)
`GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
`The New York Times Building
`620 Eighth Avenue
`New York, NY 10018
`(212) 813-8800 (telephone)
`(212) 355-3333 (facsimile)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
