throbber
THK JOURNAL. OF BiOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
`Vol. 253, No. 2, Issue of January 25, pp. 585-597, 1978
`Printed in U.S.A.
`
`Preliminary Refinement and Structural Analysis of the Fab
`Fragment from Human Immunoglobulin New at 2.0 A
`Resolution*
`
`(Received for publication, July 7, 1977)
`
`FREDERIC!< A. SAUL, L. MARIO AMZEL, AND ROBERTO J. POLJAKt
`From the Department of Biophysics, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore,
`Maryland 21205
`
`The three-dimensional structure of the Fab fragment
`from human myeloma lgG New has been refined using
`"model building" and " real space" procedures. By these
`techniques, the correlation between the amino acid se(cid:173)
`quences and the 2.0 A resolution multiple isomorphous
`replacement Fourier map has been optimized. The average
`shift of all atoms during real space refinement was 0.62 A. A
`list of the refined atomic coordinates for the 440 amino acid
`residues in the structure is given. Ramachandran plots
`prepared using the refined coordinates show a distribution
`of q,, 1/.1 angular values which corresp()nds to the predomi(cid:173)
`nant JI-pleated sheet conformation present in the structure .
`The structures of the homology subunits V11, VL, Cnl, and
`CL were superimPosed by pairs and quantitatively com(cid:173)
`pared. The closest similarities were @bserved between V H
`and VL and between Ciil and CL. Amino acid sequence
`alignments obtained from this structural superposition are
`given. The closest sequence homology in Fab New is ob(cid:173)
`served between CHI(')' heavy chain) and C1, (A. light chain).
`In addit ion, there is considerable homology between the
`variable and constant regions.
`The distances of close contacts between the homology
`subunits of F ab New have been determined. The closer
`contacts, those between atoms at a distance s; 1.2 times their
`van der Waals radii, are analyzed in relation to the constant,
`variable, and hypervariable nature of the immunoglobulin
`sequence positions at which they occur. Most of the residues
`which determine the closer contacts between V11 a nd VL and
`between CH 1 and Ci. are structurally homologous and highly
`conserved or conservatively replaced in immunoglobulin
`sequences.
`The relation between idiotypic determinants, antigen
`combining site and hypervariable regions, is discussed in
`terms of the refined model.
`
`In this paper we present the results of a preliminary
`crystallographic refinement and a list of atomic coordinates of
`* This work was supported by Research Grant AI 08202 from the
`National Institutes of Health and by Researeh Grants NP-141B and
`IM-105C from the American Cancer Society. The costs of publication
`of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges.
`This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in
`accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
`t Recipient of United States Public Health Service Research
`Career Development Award AI-70091.
`
`Fab New. 1 Some features of the refined structure are discussed
`in relation to the genetic control and physiological function of
`immunoglobulins.
`It is generally accepted (see review in Ref. 1) that electron
`density maps calculated by multiple isomorphous replacement
`techniques contain significant errors which may lead to impre(cid:173)
`cise determination of structural details such as the location of
`amino acid side chain atoms, bond angles, r/l and ijl values, cis
`or trans character of proline residues, etc. This refinement
`project was undertaken w1th the aim of obtaining more
`accurate coordinates which can be appHed to structural studies
`of other immunoglobulins and Fab · hapten complexes (2). The
`starting atomic coordinates were those of the structure previ(cid:173)
`ously described (3, 4) obtained using multiple isomorphous
`heavy atom replacements. Since the complete refinement of
`the structure of Fab New is a complex undertaking, we
`present here initial results obtained after application of two
`consecutive refinement techniques. In the first step we have
`applied a "model building'' procedure (5) in which the mea(cid:173)
`sured atomic coordinates were adjus.ted to impose standard
`bond lengths and bond angles. In a second step a "real space"
`procedure (6, 7) was used to optimize the correlation between
`the Fab New model and the multiple isomorphous replace(cid:173)
`ment, electron density Fourier map.
`The coordinates obtained by these P'rocQdures have provided
`an improved model which has been used to compare the
`tertiary structure of the homology subunits, to calculate
`interatomic contacts that define the quaternary structure of
`Fab, and to re-examine the conformation of the combining
`site.
`
`METHOOS
`Measurement of Model Coordinates -Atomic coordinates were
`measured on the 2 A (nominal) resolut ion model previously de(cid:173)
`scribed (4). A two-pointer device was used for this purpose: a
`horizontal pointer (50 inches long) was brought to touch atom
`centers by displacing the device on the base of the model, adjusting
`the height of the pointer aloni;r a i;rraduated scale (z coordinate)
`while a second, parallel, fixed poin~r of equal length gave the x, y
`coordinates on a grid at the base of the model. The use of a level and
`leveling screws at the base of the two-pointer device was essential
`for obtaining reproducible coordinates. While these measurements
`were made, the image of the model and the atom centers were
`
`' The abbreviations used for immunoglobulins, their polypeptide
`chains, and fragments are as recommended in (1964) Bull. W H 0
`30, 447.
`
`585
`
`1 of 14
`
`Celltrion, Inc., Exhibit 1083
`
`

`

`Structural Refinement of Fab New
`
`586
`projected on the corresponding sections of the Fourier map using an
`optical comparator (8) to verify that their location and the coordinate
`values corresponded with the Fourier map.
`Model Building Procedure - The set of measured coordinates for
`the 3185 non-hydrogen atoms in the structure provided the starting
`point for this procedure. In general, these coordinates are subject to
`errors due to measurement uncertainty and to mechanical deforma(cid:173)
`tions of t he skeletal brass model. Consequently, the mathematical
`model building procedure of Diamond (5) programmed for a digital
`computer was used in order to impose standard bond lengths and
`bond angles in the model. The measured coordinates were used to
`provide a guide point for each (non-hydrogen) atom in the structure.
`Some conditions used in this part of the refinement process are given
`in Table I. All the varied angles are dihedral; the -rJ..r,-c..-<:) angle
`was allowed to vary since this condition gave a much closer correla(cid:173)
`tion with input coordinates without introducing large distortions in
`the idealized, modd-1..ouilt f:St:Omt:tq of the molecule. Residues for
`which the model-built coordinates differed considerably from the
`input coordinates or which had an abnormal r, value were remeas(cid:173)
`ured and checked for correspondence with the Fourier map. These
`discrepancies could always be traced to errors in the measurement
`of coordinates or to distortions of the brass model. When necessary
`the coordinates were measured again after rebuilding distorted
`regions and the remeasured coordinates were submitted to the model
`building procedure as guide points. The final average value of
`&- 0(&-0 = l-r0
`109.3°1) for the 440 residues in the model-built
`structure was 5.43°. Pro 151 in C.. l was built and refined in the cis
`conformation. The root mean square shift from the initial coordi(cid:173)
`nates for all non-hydrogen atoms in the structure was 0.2 A.
`Real Space Refinement-The model-built coordinates were used
`as a starting set for real space refinement (6). The 2.0 A electron
`density map used for the automatic fitting of the atomic coordinates
`was calculated using multiple isomorphous replacement phases as
`described before (3, 4). The electron density function was calculated
`at intervals of 1/160 along x, (a = lll.43 A), 1/80 along y (b = 56.68
`A), and 1/130 along z (c = 90.30 A) in sections of constant y . A
`compute-r program incorporating a fast-Fourier transform algorithm
`was used for this calculation. Five cycles of real space refinement
`were carried out using the conditions defined in Table II. Values of
`atomic radii for carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, and sulfur that gave
`fastest convergence in trials using a small part of the structure were
`adopted and kept constant during refinement. Progress in the
`refinement process was followed by inspection of the root mean
`square shifts in coordinates, shifts in the coordinates of individual
`atoms, and adjustments of amino acid scale factors. Unusually large
`shifts in coordinates were checked using the optical comparator and
`the Fourier map. All refinement calculations were carried out using
`computer programs implemented at the Brookhaven National Lab(cid:173)
`oratories.
`
`-
`
`RESUJ.: ns A~ll lJISl,;USSlON
`
`The root mean square shifts of atomic coordinates after five
`cycles of real space refinement converged to an average value
`of0.09 A. The values after each cycle were: 0.46 A, 0.20 A, 0.13
`A, 0.10 A, and 0.09 A. The average shift of all atoms during
`real space refinement was 0.62 A. In most parts of the
`molecule, the coordinates after refinement are in very good
`agreement with the features of the electron density map (Fig.
`
`TABLE I
`Conditions of model building refinement•
`Parameters varied were: <I>, o/J, x, T (N Ca C). Flexible proline
`residues were used. In addition, T(Ca Cfj Cy) was allowed to vary in
`Cys, His, Phe, Trp, and Tyr residues. A list of the sources of the
`amino acid groups used in model building is given in Table I of
`Diamond (7).
`
`TABLE 11
`Conditions of real space refinement"
`5
`Zone length:
`6
`Margin width:
`Fixed atomic radii: 1.4 A
`Relative atomic weights; C:6, 0:7, N :8, 8:16
`Relative softne-ss of angular parameters that were allowed to vary:
`</>.iii: 4_0
`x: 3.2
`Filter levels:
`
`0.01
`0_0001
`Scale factor and background
`0.01
`0.001
`Translational refinement
`0.001
`0.001
`Rotat ional refinement•
`Electron density map grid; 111.43/160, 56.68/80, 90.30/130 along cell
`edgl!s
`• See Diamond (6, 7 ) for definition of terms.
`• Nonlinear constraints were used to preserve chain continuity.
`
`1). Many carbonyl groups of the main polypeptide chain can
`be reliably positioned (Fig. 2). In general, coordinates of atoms
`in regions of strong, well defined electron density converged
`rapidly in the first cycle of refinement and moved very little
`in subsequent cycles. Atoms in regions of lower density
`converged more slowly. A few residues in poorly defined
`regions of low density showed little convergence, although
`their total shift from the starling coordinates was small. The
`movement of main chain atoms tended to be smaller than
`those of side chains, presumably due to their better defined
`electron density and to greater constraints on their positions.
`The progress of refinement was checked after each cycle by
`inspect ing the fit of atoms whose shifts were substantially
`greater than the average. Some side chain groups which had
`been shifted by the Diamond model building procedure were
`moved back to their original positions by real space refine(cid:173)
`ment. In the fifth cycle of refinement, an average shift greater
`than 1 A occurred for three consecutive amino acid residues
`(Gly 166, Val 167, and His 168) in the C"l region. Inspection
`of the position of these atoms showed that they had moved to
`a conformation that appears to be in better agreement with
`the electron density map than the original model. The coordi(cid:173)
`nates for all atoms of Fab New after relinement, given in the
`"Appendix," are filed with the Protein Data Bank at Brook(cid:173)
`haven National Laboratory. No major features of the map
`rem<iin unexplained, although a !'lUIDbcr of pQS$iblc solvent
`molecules are found on the surface of the molecule. The
`conventional R factor, 2 based on Fe obtained with the coordi(cid:173)
`nates i n "Appendix" and an overall temperature factor (B =
`18.0), is R = 0.46. This value is reasonable given the refine(cid:173)
`ment approximations outlined in Table 11 and the fact that no
`solvent atoms were included in the model. Further refinement
`using observed structure factors and calculated phases is
`currently underway.
`The S- S distances in the five Fab disulfide bonds were
`allowed to vary without constraints. At the end of the refine(cid:173)
`ment these distances were found to be: V "' 2.00 A; V 1,.1 2.46 A;
`CHI, 2.30 A; c ... , 2.30 A; C11l -C1,., 2.43 A.
`Ramachandran Plots
`The Ramachandran plots of the V 1,. and C1,. homology sub-
`
`- Fe I / IF0 , where F0 is observed structure amplitude
`l I F0
`' R =
`and Fe is calculated structure amplitude.
`3 The isotropic temperature factor (8) used in the expression exp
`{-8 sin 2 91>- 2) .
`
`Probe
`
`Len£h
`(resi ues)
`
`0.1
`1
`0.1
`2
`2
`0.1
`3
`3
`• See Diamond (5) for definition of terms.
`
`C,
`
`Filter constants
`c.
`lo-•
`10- •
`10 .....
`
`2 of 14
`
`Celltrion, Inc., Exhibit 1083
`
`

`

`Structural R efinement of Fab New
`
`587
`
`F1G. 1 (upper) . Stereo view of some main chain and side chain
`groups of Fab New after five cycles of real space refinement super(cid:173)
`imposed on the corresponding electron density of the multiple
`isomorphous replacement 2 A resolution map.
`
`FIG. 2 (lower). Stereo view of some amino acid residues of Fab
`New superimposed on the corresponding density of the multiple
`isomorphous replacement map. Carbonyl groups of the main poly(cid:173)
`peptide chain are clearly seen.
`
`360 r-~~-.~.~,~.--.-~ ....... -, ~~--.~~~~~~~ ...... ~~ ......
`..
`•• • ., ..
`<t-
`-~~ ... _ o:
`•": •
`I
`•
`I
`• •• •
`>'
`
`. .. , ... :
`
`/
`
`•
`
`I
`I
`I
`I
`1 _____ _ _ 1
`I •
`
`/ 1
`I
`f •
`I
`I
`I
`,
`I
`I
`,_,
`(
`I
`
`0
`
`0
`
`/J .
`lo
`/
`I
`[
`I
`I
`'l
`I
`I
`I
`' ..... 1
`
`.
`
`. . . . \
`·: .
`. .
`.. ~.,t:
`• •.•.
`•
`I
`-4\~ • •• • I
`• •'1~
`I
`. ,
`••
`'
`• 1 e
`.
`'-------··
`/---.-,
`/ . .,
`_,,,, .
`'
`'• .,
`
`,,,,, - •
`
`• •
`0 ·~ /
`f
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`•
`
`0
`
`f
`
`~
`
`360
`
`300
`
`240
`
`180
`
`120
`
`60
`
`'
`
`•
`
`o ~-----~---_-~ ..... ~--·~---~'"..-~~-"~~~ ...... ~~~ ..... ~~ ........
`
`0
`
`60
`
`120
`
`180
`
`240
`
`300
`
`360
`
`300
`
`2.40
`
`180
`
`'
`
`, ----
`
`/
`-.._ __
`
`/
`
`••
`
`I
`I
`I
`
`. .
`
`120
`
`I
`- - - - - - - - _ _ J
`
`60
`
`.
`
`- - - - - - , ,
`
`0 -
`
`- .- -
`
`0
`
`60
`
`120
`
`180
`
`240
`
`300
`
`360
`
`FJC. 3. Ramachandran plots of the VL and Q homology subunits ofFab New. The distribution of<f:> , o/J angles indicates the predominant
`antiparallel P-pleated sheet structure of the subunits. Glycine residues are indicated by 0 .
`
`units (see Fig. 3 ) show a distribution of <f>, l/J angles which
`corresponds with the predominant antiparallel ,8-pleated sheet
`structure present in V H• V L• CHl, and c ... As observed in
`sever a l other protem structures, the </>, tfJ angles for glycine
`
`residues are scattered in the plot, frequently appearing in
`nonallowed regions for L-amino acids. Several other residues
`which occur outside areas of allowed conformation are found
`in bends of the polypeptide chains; it is expected that further
`
`3 of 14
`
`Celltrion, Inc., Exhibit 1083
`
`

`

`588
`
`Structural Refinement of Fab New
`
`refinement will improve the angular values observed for these
`residues.
`
`Structural Comparison of Homology Subunits
`The structural homology of V H• VL, C8 1, and CL has been
`described before (3, 4). A quantitative analysis of this homol(cid:173)
`ogy using the method of Rao and Rossmann (9) is presented
`here. A $imil!lr !ln'1lysis h!l$ been m!lde by Rich<irdson et r;rl.
`(10) comparing the structures of superoxide dismut ase and
`the murine Fab McPC 603 fragment.
`Initial matrices relating the Ca coordinates of the homology
`subunits were obtained from a small number of structurally
`equivalent amino acids. The num.ber of equivalences was
`then extended by an automatic search for stretches of poly(cid:173)
`peptide chain for which the distances between putatively
`equivalent Cas was smaller than 3.8 A. Based on the extended
`eq uivalences new matrices were calculated and the process
`was iterated until no changes in equivalences were observed.
`A summary of the results is presented in Table Ill which lists
`the number of Cas occurring at distances of less than 1.5 A
`and less than 3.0 A, for all the six possible pairings of
`subunits which were superimposed and compared by this
`process. The average value of the minimum base change
`necessary to exchange the codons of the structurally equiva(cid:173)
`lent amino acids is also given in Table lll.
`As can be seen in Table Ill, there is an even closer structural
`homology between VH, VL, C81, and CL in Fab New than that
`observed for McPC 603 Fab (10), probably reflecting the
`higher resolution of the Fab New model. Presumably the Ca
`distances given in Table IIJ could become smaller with further
`crystallographic refinement. The number of Cas which super(cid:173)
`impose with distances shorter than 1.5 A and 3.0 A is larger
`wh en comparing V H to V L and CHl to CL. Also, there is good
`(inverse! correlation between the number of Cas t hat are
`structurally equivalent and the average minimum base
`change per codon. Furthermore, when a restrictive condition
`for structural equivalence is imposed ( d c"-<.A 5 1.5 A) the
`average base change per codon becomes smaller, reflecting a
`higher degree of conservation of amino acid sequences.
`It should be emphasized here that amino acid sequence
`information is not used in the quantitative three-dimensional
`alignment procedure described above. However, this proce·
`dure leads to amino acid sequence alignments that clearly
`reflect the well established homologies between the V8 and
`Vi.., and between the Cii and Ct regions of immunoglobulins
`(see Figs. 4 and 5). The closest sequence similarity in Fab
`New occurs between ~l(y) and Ct(X), although, as shown in
`Table III, the structural similarity between V8 and v .. is close
`to that between ~ 1 and Ci. (see Figs. 6, 7, and 8). In addition,
`
`TABLE Ill
`Alignment of a-carbon coordinates of four homology subu nics of Fab
`(New) using m ethod of Rao and Rossmann (9)
`Number of
`Average
`Number of
`Av erage
`c. pairs
`c. pairs
`minimum
`minimum
`equiva·
`base change
`base change
`equiva·
`lenced with per codon for
`lenced with per codon for
`deo.,,.A s. 3. o dc.-eoAs. 3.o
`d c.-ca{ ' I. 5 d c.-eoA'5. 1. 5
`
`Subunits
`
`VwV1.
`C11i-CL
`c .. -v ..
`c .. -vH
`CHI-VI.
`c .. 1-v11
`
`56
`60
`40
`29
`27
`25
`
`0.98
`0.71
`1.03
`1.04
`1.04
`J.29
`
`81
`82
`66
`59
`58
`49
`
`0.97
`0.80
`1.23
`1.28
`1.24
`1.40
`
`Table III shows that there is considerable homology between
`the V and C regions. These results can be interpreted to
`indicate that all the homology regions contain a basic core of
`amino acid residues with highly preserved three-dimensional
`structure. The chemical nature of these residues is also
`preserved as indicated by the correspondingly lower values of
`the average base change per codon. As stated before (3) these
`findings strongly support the postulate (15) of a gene duplica(cid:173)
`tion m echa11i:;rn whida gave ri:;e w thi:! different humulugy
`regions of immunoglobulins.
`The Cas of the homologous sequences, -Phe-Gly-Gly-Gly(cid:173)
`(99 t.o 102) in Vi, and -Trp-Gly-Gln-Gly- (107 t.o 110) in VH, can
`be closely superimposed as can Ca atoms immediately preced(cid:173)
`ing and following those residues. This conserved conformation
`gives no evidence supporting the postulate (16) that the
`glycine residues could serve as a pivot to allow for optimal
`contacts between an antibody and its ligands. An alternative
`explanation for these constant, homologous V11 and Vi, se(cid:173)
`quences has been proposed (4) in terms ofintersubunit (Vu to
`V1, , see below) and intrasubunit contacts.
`The limits between the V and C homology regions can be
`defined from the model. The sequence -Val-Ser-Ser- (115 to
`117, Fig. 4) which is shared by y and µ.human H chains marks
`the COOH terminus of Vu, and following a sharp bend in the
`polypeptide chain the sequence -Ala-Ser-Thr (118 to 120)
`marks the NH2 terminus of~l. The sequence -Thr-Val-Leu(cid:173)
`(106 t.o 108) corresponds to the COOH terminus of Vi.. and the
`residues -Gln-Pro-Lys- (110 to 112) constitute the NH2 termi(cid:173)
`nus of Ct. Thus, in the three-dimensional model Arg 109
`(usually assigned to VL) could be considered either as the end
`of VL or as the beginning residue of Ct. By the structural
`alignment described here however, Arg 109 can be properly
`considered as the COOH terminus of Vi, .
`In agreement with the Gm(4-) serological specificity oflgG
`New (17), a lysine residue is placed at position 214 in Cu 1.
`This residue, corresponding to the Gm(l 7) allotype provides a
`better fit with the Fourier map than an arginine residue
`(which correlates with Gm(4)) at that position. This interpre(cid:173)
`tation is reinforcR.d hy thP. Gm(l +) ."-P.rolngic.sil spe.r.ifir.it.y of
`IgG New (17) which has been verified by amino acid sequence
`analysis (12).
`
`Quaternary Structure
`Contacts between Homology Subunits -The closer contacts
`between the homology subunits of Fab New are diagrammat(cid:173)
`ically represented in Fig. 9 by lines joining Ca atoms sepa(cid:173)
`rated by a distance of 8 A or less. This figure provides a
`description of regions of VH, Vi., ~ 1, and C.. in which there
`are higher density of contacts. Inspection of Figs. 8 and 9
`indicates that the interactions between Vu and VL and be(cid:173)
`tween ~ 1 and C.. are more extensive than those between Vu
`and C,,, 1 and those between Vi.. and Q. The fact that the V11
`and Ci.i 1 subunits (whose major axes make an angle smaller
`than 90°) interact more extensively than V1, and Ct (whose
`major axes makes an angle larger than 90°) is also reflected in
`Figs. 8 and 9.
`Intersubunit contacts between side chain and main chain
`atom~ situated at a distance not larger than 1.2 times their
`van der Waals radii are given in Table IV. This table lists
`contacting residues and the number of close contacts that
`atoms from a given residue make with atoms of other residues.
`Evidently, amino acids with larger side chains have a poten(cid:173)
`tial to make more contacts with other amino acids, thus for
`example, VH Trp 107 makes 29 intersubunit contacts, Trp 47
`
`4 of 14
`
`Celltrion, Inc., Exhibit 1083
`
`

`

`Structural Refinement of Fab New
`
`589
`
`•o
`30
`z7abc
`20
`10
`~o
`----SSVL~OPtSVSGAt•G0kVTI8CTGSSSMIGAGRBVKWYQQL•GrAPI-~LlP•••Aa••••
`
`120
`110
`lSO
`1'0
`UO
`Q1KAAPSVTLPPPSS&ILQAIEATLVCLISDPYPGAV•TVAIK••AD&S•••••••••••••••••
`
`120
`160
`150
`100
`130
`ASTKGPSV7PLAPSSKSTSGGTAALGCLV~OYPPBPV-TVSW•---SG-•••--------------
`
`70
`lot
`100
`90
`80
`61
`·---rsvsssG----------SSATLAITGLQAIDllDYYCQSYOlSLt••·VPGGGTJLTVLl
`
`110
`70
`117
`100
`90
`80
`TPLRSRYTMLVWT-s-------&•QP SL•LSSVT AADTAVYICARMLIAG•CI DV WGQG SLVTVS a
`
`160
`
`170
`
`180
`
`190
`
`200
`
`210
`
`11•
`
`220
`210
`190
`180
`170
`200
`•ALTS••GV8TPPAVLQSSGLY SL88VVTVP888LGT•QT YICIVIBKPllTK•V DKJ•V IPllC
`Fie. 4. Amino acid sequences of the V,, , C.,, V,,, and C,, 1 homology regions of Fab New aligned by comparison of their three-dimensional
`structures. - - - indicate gaps introduced to maximize alignment of the three-dimensional structures. * indicate deletions in the VL
`sequence. See Ref. 11 for the VL and C.. sequences, Ref. 12 for VH , and Ref. 13 for C,.l. Abbreviations for amino acids are as given in Ref. 14.
`
`FIG. 5. Diagram of hydrogen bond(cid:173)
`ing (broken lines) between main chain
`atoms for the VL, C.,, V,,, and C.. l
`homology regions of Fab New. The
`hydrogen-bonded clusters correspond
`to the two ,S-sheet structures of each
`subunit. Cysteine residues that partic(cid:173)
`ipate in intrachain and interchain di(cid:173)
`sulfide bonds are underlined.
`
`makes 28 contacts and Arg 43 makes 24 contacts.
`The contacts between Vu and Vi. are of particular interest
`in view of the fact that different H and L immunoglobulin
`chains can form structurally viable pairs. Three types of Vu -
`
`V1, contacts will be considered in this discussion: first, the
`contacts which are at the core of the contacting region, made
`by residues which are invariant or semi-invariant in Vu and
`Vt. sequences; second, the contacts made by invariant or semi-
`
`5 of 14
`
`Celltrion, Inc., Exhibit 1083
`
`

`

`590
`
`Structural Refinement of Fab New
`
`Flo. 6. Stereo pair drawings of the
`a carbon backbones of the VL ( wp) and
`VH (botwm) subunits. The subunits are
`viewed here in similar orientations.
`
`F10. 7. Stereo pair drawing of the a
`carbon backbones of the Q (top) and
`C,, 1 (bot.I-Om) subunits viewed in simi(cid:173)
`lar orientations.
`
`6 of 14
`
`Celltrion, Inc., Exhibit 1083
`
`

`

`Structural Refinement of Fab New
`
`591
`
`Fie. 8. Stereo pair drawing of the a
`carbon backbone of Fab New.
`
`invariant residues with hypervariable residues; and finnlly,
`those made between hypervariable residues.
`The core of the V11 -VL contacting region can be described as
`determined by residues Val 37, Gin 39, Leu 45, Tyr 94, and
`Trp 107 in VH and by residues Tyr 35, Gin 37, Ala 42, Pro 43,
`Tyr 86, and Phe 99 in V1• • These residues are structurally
`homologous with the exception that v .. Ala 42 has no clear
`correspondence in V11 due to a structural "insertion" (see Fig.
`4). These homologous V11 and V1. residues make numerous
`contacts with each other (about 50% of those listed in Table
`IV) or with other, nonhypervariable residues. The rings ofTrp
`107 (V11 ) and Pro 43 (Vi), at the center of the VL -V11 contacting
`region, are nearly parallel and stacked on each other. The
`contact residues listed above are invariant or are replaced by
`homologous residues in VL (/< and X) and V11 sequences from
`different animal species. For example, Tyr 35, Gin 37, Pro 43,
`and Phe 99 appear constant in human L chains (K or>..), and
`Gin 39, Tyr 94 (replaced by Phe in a very few cases), and Trp
`107 (replaced by Phe or Tyr in a very few cases) appear nearly
`constant in human H chains. Ala 42, Tyr 86 in VL and Val 37
`in V11 are more frequently replaced by homologous residues:
`Ser 42, Phe 86, and Ile 37. The invariant or nearly invariant
`nature of these residues of the main VwVL contacting area
`provides a structural basis (together with interactions be(cid:173)
`tween Ci 1 and C.., see below) for the property of different H
`and L chains to recombine into new immunoglobulin mole(cid:173)
`cules (see References 18, 19, and in particular 20, for a recent
`review and experimental data on this topic).
`A second type of contact listed ln Table IV is mad~ ~tw~tm
`constant or nonhypervariable residues and hypervariable res·
`idues. For example, the side chain atoms of V,. Trp 47. a
`constant residue in human, mouse, guinea pig, and in most
`rabbit immunoglobulin sequences, make close contacts with
`Ser 93, Leu 94, and Arg 95 in the third hypervariable region of
`V1,. However, a large number of these contacts involve the
`peptide chain atoms of the V,, residues. Replacements in the
`V1, side chains will not necessarily a lter the nature of these
`contacts. Similar contacts appear to be made by Vi. Leu 45
`(invariant or semi-invariant in human L chains) with the
`peptide chain at VH hypervariable position 104. Contacts of
`this type could also be made from V,, Tyr 35 to the peptide
`chain atoms of the fourth hypervariable region of Vu in chains
`of different length than Vu New.
`The third type of contact to be discussed here is that made
`between hypervariable residues, such as those made between
`V11 Asn 98 and V,, Arg 95. These contacts are more difficult to
`evaluate in general terms (a) because the location of some of
`the residues involved might be changed by further refinement
`to a larger extent than those of most other residues in the
`sequence, and (b) because it is possible that in other immu(cid:173)
`noglobulins, replacements by different amino acid side chains
`
`nt these positions could be accommodated by small displac.
`ments of the hypervariable peptide loops. These "idiotypic"
`interactions are consequently more difficult to assess. How(cid:173)
`ever, they could perhaps explain the preferred reassociation
`observed between complementary H and L chains derived
`from a single immunoglobulin molecule (20). Most of the
`contacts discussed above consist of van der Waals interactions
`between hydrophobic side chains. However, a few hydrogen
`bonds can be indicated: V11 Gin 39 to V,. Gin 37, and V,, Asn 98
`to VL Tyr 90 and/or V.. Arg 95. Also, an ion pair is formed
`between V11 Arg 43 and VL Asp 84.
`In the Fab New model the contacts between V" and V1• are
`very close (Table IV}, giving rise to a compact dimer. No
`haptens or even solvent molecules can be accommodated
`between V11 and VL beyond the combining site, a situation
`which is different from that described for an L-chain dimer
`(21).
`As shown in Table IV the interactions between C,, 1 and C,,
`are extensive. The core of the contact area between C,11 and
`C.. is defined by ~ 1 residues Leu 128, Ala 129, Gly 143, and
`Leu 145 and the structurally homologous C.. residues Phe 120,
`Pro 121, Val 135, and Leu 137. These residues appear to be
`invariant or nearly invariant in the H and L sequences from
`different animal species. Most of the other contact residues
`such as ~1: Phe 126, Pro 127, Thr 139, Lys 147, Phe 170, Pro
`171, Val 173, Gin 175, Ser 181, Val 185, Lys 218, and C,,: Thr
`118, Ser 123, Glu 125, Glu 126, Lys 131, Thr 133, Thr 164, Ser
`177, Tyr 179, Lys 206, are also invariant or replaced by
`humvlugvus re:si<lues in ihe inID1w1oglobulin chains from dif·
`ferent animal species. In the contact area the central location
`of C,, 1 Leu 128 and C,_ Phe 120 is reflected in the large number
`of contacts (20 contacts) they make with each other and with
`many other residues (see Table IV). As pointed out by Novotny
`and Franek (22) the amino acid sequence of the four-stranded
`,8-pleated sheet is more conserved than the rest of the C\
`regions in different animal species, leading to a dendrogram
`(or genealogic tree) of distorted evolutionary distances. This
`observation can be analyred in terms of the structural model
`presented here as follows. The four-stranded ~ sheets of C,11
`and C,, contain side chains which make intrasubunit contacts
`and in particular, they contain all or nearly all of the contact
`residues between C.il and C.. (discussed above). Evjdently,
`mutational events leading to amino acid replacements at
`t.hese positions would have to occur in a complementary
`pattern in both C., 1 and C,, in order to preserve tertiary and
`quaternary immunoglobulin structure, and consequently they
`would be expected to occur at a slower rate than mutations in
`other regions of~ 1 and C,,.
`As can be seen in Table IV the region immediately preced(cid:173)
`ing the interchain disulfide bond does not provide close con(cid:173)
`tacts between 4 11 and C. .. In addition, the two strands of
`
`7 of 14
`
`Celltrion, Inc., Exhibit 1083
`
`

`

`592
`
`VL
`
`Structural Refinement of Fab New
`
`VH
`
`CL
`
`116
`117
`118
`119
`
`120
`121
`122
`123
`124
`
`125
`128
`
`182
`163
`114
`185
`
`198
`117
`
`175
`171
`1n
`
`212
`213
`214
`
`44
`
`45 ...
`47 ...
`
`49
`
`51
`
`110
`
`CH1
`
`CL
`
`187
`
`188
`
`1119
`
`171
`
`1n
`
`161
`
`162
`
`163
`
`1.•
`
`1.0
`
`101
`
`102
`
`VH
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`112
`
`113
`
`CH1
`
`128
`127
`128
`129
`130
`131
`132
`133
`
`140
`141
`142
`1'3
`
`170
`171
`
`219
`:no
`
`VL
`
`38
`
`JI
`
`40
`
`79
`
`90
`
`12
`
`114
`FIG. 9. Intersubunit a carbon contacts at distances of 8 A or less. Contacts are indicated by lines j oining the corresponding amino acid
`residue numbers. Numbers on the lines indicate the contact distance (in Angstroms). Note the extensive V1• -VH and C..-C.1 I interactions.
`
`polypeptide chain that come together at the interchain disul(cid:173)
`fide bond do not closely int.eract with the rest of C... l or Ci ..
`This region can be described as having a loose conformation,
`with a lower electron density in the Fourier map. These
`structural features are in agreement with the notion of seg-
`
`mental flexibility residing around this part of the immuno(cid:173)
`globulin structure and in the immediat.ely adjacent hinge
`region of the H chain.
`Hyperuariable Regions, Idiotypes, and Combining Site(cid:173)
`The results of several experimental approaches (see Chapter II
`
`8 of 14
`
`Celltrion, Inc., Exhibit 1083
`
`

`

`Structural Refinement of Fab New
`
`593
`
`in Ref. 23 for a comprehensive review) strongly suggested that
`hypervariable residues in the amino acid sequences of H and
`L chains, idiotypic deter

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket