`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`Paper 35
`Entered: February 7, 2018
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`CELLTRION, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`GENENTECH, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-01373 (Patent 6,407,213 B1)
`Case IPR2017-01374 (Patent 6,407,213 B1)1
`____________
`
`
`Before SHERIDAN K. SNEDDEN, ZHENYU YANG, and
`ROBERT A. POLLOCK, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`YANG, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`DECISION
`Patent Owner’s Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission of
`Andrew Danford, Robert J. Gunther, Jr., Daralyn J. Durie,
`Lisa J. Pirozzolo, and Kevin S. Prussia
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 This order addresses issues that are common to each referenced case. We,
`therefore, issue a single order that has been entered in each case. For convenience,
`paper numbers refer to those filed in IPR2017-01373.
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01373 (Patent 6,407,213 B1)
`IPR2017-01374 (Patent 6,407,213 B1)
`
`Patent Owner filed motions for pro hac vice admission of Andrew Danford
`(Paper 28), Robert J. Gunther, Jr. (Paper 24), Daralyn J. Durie (Paper 25), Lisa J.
`Pirozzolo (Paper 27), and Kevin S. Prussia (Paper 26). The motions are supported
`by the declarations of Mr. Danford (Ex. 2036), Mr. Gunther (Ex. 2032), Ms. Durie
`(Ex. 2033), Ms. Pirozzolo (Ex. 2034), and Mr. Prussia (Ex. 2035), respectively.
`On page one of each motion, Patent Owner states that Petitioner does not oppose
`the motion.
`The Board has reviewed the submissions and determined that the
`requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 42.10 have been met and there is good cause to admit
`Mr. Danford, Mr. Gunther, Ms. Durie, Ms. Pirozzolo, and Mr. Prussia pro hac
`vice.
`
`
`It is, therefore,
`
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s motions for admission of Andrew Danford,
`Robert J. Gunther, Jr., Daralyn J. Durie, Lisa J. Pirozzolo, and Kevin S. Prussia pro
`hac vice are granted;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Danford, Mr. Gunther, Ms. Durie,
`Ms. Pirozzolo, and Mr. Prussia are authorized to represent Patent Owner only as
`back-up counsel in the instant proceedings;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is to continue to have a registered
`practitioner represent it as lead counsel for the instant proceedings;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Danford, Mr. Gunther, Ms. Durie,
`Ms. Pirozzolo, and Mr. Prussia shall comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
` 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01373 (Patent 6,407,213 B1)
`IPR2017-01374 (Patent 6,407,213 B1)
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of the
`C.F.R.; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Danford, Mr. Gunther, Ms. Durie,
`Ms. Pirozzolo, and Mr. Prussia shall be subject to the Office’s disciplinary
`jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a) and the Office’s Rules of Professional
`Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101-11.901.
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Cynthia Hardman
`Robert V. Cerwinski
`GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
`chardman@goodwinlaw.com
`rcerwinski@goodwinlaw.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`David L. Cavanaugh
`Rebecca A. Whitfield
`Robert Gunther
`Lisa Pirozzolo
`Kevin Prussia
`Andrew J. Danford
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP
`david.cavanaugh@wilmerhale.com
`rebecca.whitfield@wilmerhale.com
`Robert.Gunther@wilmerhale.com
`Lisa.Pirozzolo@wilmerhale.com
`Kevin.Prussia@wilmerhale.com
`Andrew.Danford@wilmerhale.com
`
`
`
`
` 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01373 (Patent 6,407,213 B1)
`IPR2017-01374 (Patent 6,407,213 B1)
`
`
`
`
`Adam R. Brausa
`Daralyn Durie
`DURIE TANGRI LLP
`abrausa@durietangri.com
`ddurie@durietangri.com
`
`
` 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
