·1· · · UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`·2· · · BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`·3· ·EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES· · ·)
`· · ·CORP., EDWARDS· · · · · ·)
`·4· ·LIFESCIENCES LLC, AND· · )
`· · ·EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES AG· )
`·5· · · · · · · · · · · · · · )
`· · · · · · · ·Petitioners,· ·)
`·6· · · · · · · · · · · · · · ) CASE IPR
`· · ·v.· · · · · · · · · · · ·) 2017-00060
`·7· · · · · · · · · · · · · · )
`· · ·BOSTON SCIENTIFIC· · · · )
`·8· ·SCIMED, INC.,· · · · · · )
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · )
`·9· · · · · · ·Patent Owner· ·)
`
`10
`
`11· · · · · · ·Deposition of NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.,
`
`12· ·taken pursuant to notice, at the law offices
`
`13· ·of Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell, LLP 1201
`
`14· ·Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware, beginning
`
`15· ·at 8:40 a.m., on Thursday, June 15, 2017,
`
`16· ·before Terry Barbano Burke, RMR-CRR and Notary
`
`17· ·Public.
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`Page 001 of 199
`
`Edwards Lifesciences v. Boston Scientific Scimed
`IPR2017-01293, U.S. Patent 8,992,608
`Exhibit 2006
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.com
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`1
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
`
`
`
`·2· · · BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`·3· ·EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES· · ·)
`· · ·CORP., EDWARDS· · · · · ·)
`·4· ·LIFESCIENCES LLC, AND· · )
`· · ·EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES AG· )
`·5· · · · · · · · · · · · · · )
`· · · · · · · ·Petitioners,· ·)
`·6· · · · · · · · · · · · · · ) CASE IPR
`· · ·v.· · · · · · · · · · · ·) 2017-00060
`·7· · · · · · · · · · · · · · )
`· · ·BOSTON SCIENTIFIC· · · · )
`·8· ·SCIMED, INC.,· · · · · · )
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · )
`·9· · · · · · ·Patent Owner· ·)
`
`10
`
`11· · · · · · ·Deposition of NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.,
`
`12· ·taken pursuant to notice, at the law offices
`
`13· ·of Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell, LLP 1201
`
`14· ·Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware, beginning
`
`15· ·at 8:40 a.m., on Thursday, June 15, 2017,
`
`16· ·before Terry Barbano Burke, RMR-CRR and Notary
`
`17· ·Public.
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`Page 001 of 199
`
`Edwards Lifesciences v. Boston Scientific Scimed
`IPR2017-01293, U.S. Patent 8,992,608
`Exhibit 2006
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.com
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`1
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
`
`
`
`·1· ·APPEARANCES:
`
`·2· · · · BRIAN P. EGAN, ESQUIRE
`· · · · · MORRIS NICHOLS ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP
`·3· · · · · 1201 North Market Street
`· · · · · · Wilmington, Delaware 19801
`·4· · · · · · · · · · · · -and-
`· · · · · GREGORY S. CORDREY, ESQUIRE
`·5· · · · JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MITCHELL, LLP
`· · · · · · 3 Park Plaza - Suite 1100
`·6· · · · · Irvine, California· 92614
`· · · · · · For the Petitioner
`·7
`· · · · · MARC A. COHN, ESQUIRE
`·8· · · · EDWARD HAN, ESQUIRE
`· · · · · ARNOLD & PORTER/KAYE SCHOLER
`·9· · · · · 601 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
`· · · · · · Washington, DC· 20001-3743
`10· · · · · For the Patent Owner
`
`11· ·ALSO PRESENT:
`· · · · · VICTORIA BROWN, Legal Intern
`12
`· · · · · · · · · · · -· · ·-· · ·-
`13
`
`14· · · · · · · · · ·NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.,
`
`15· · · · the deponent herein, having first been
`
`16· · · · duly sworn on oath, was examined and
`
`17· · · · testified as follows:
`
`18· ·BY MR. COHN:
`
`19· · · ·Q.· Good morning, Dr. Buller.
`
`20· · · ·A.· Good morning.
`
`21· · · ·Q.· You submitted an expert report in this
`
`22· ·inter partes review proceeding; is that right?
`
`23· · · ·A.· Yes.
`
`24· · · ·Q.· An expert declaration?
`
`Page 002 of 199
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.com
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`2
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
`
`
`
`·1· · · ·A.· That's why I was hesitating.· Yes, I
`
`·2· ·think it was a declaration.
`
`·3· · · ·Q.· And you signed that declaration under
`
`·4· ·oath to give the truth and nothing but the
`
`·5· ·truth so help you God in that declaration; is
`
`·6· ·that right?
`
`·7· · · ·A.· Yes, correct.
`
`·8· · · ·Q.· Now, you also gave testimony recently
`
`·9· ·in a United Kingdom litigation about the
`
`10· ·European counterpart to the patent that is at
`
`11· ·issue in this inter partes proceeding; is that
`
`12· ·right?
`
`13· · · · · · · · ·MR. EGAN:· Objection.
`
`14· ·Relevance.
`
`15· · · · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Earlier this year.
`
`16· ·BY MR. COHN:
`
`17· · · ·Q.· That was January this year; correct?
`
`18· · · ·A.· Correct.
`
`19· · · ·Q.· And in that proceeding, you swore to
`
`20· ·tell the truth so help you God, is that right,
`
`21· ·when you testified in court?
`
`22· · · ·A.· Yes.
`
`23· · · ·Q.· And the oath that you took in that
`
`24· ·proceeding, you take that oath as seriously as
`
`Page 003 of 199
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.com
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`3
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
`
`
`
`·1· ·you took the oath that you just gave this
`
`·2· ·morning; is that right?
`
`·3· · · ·A.· Of course, yes.
`
`·4· · · ·Q.· And you stand by your testimony in the
`
`·5· ·UK in January?
`
`·6· · · ·A.· I do.
`
`·7· · · ·Q.· Is there anything that you recall
`
`·8· ·saying in that proceeding that you want to
`
`·9· ·correct or clarify right now?
`
`10· · · ·A.· Not as I sit here.· I mean I may have
`
`11· ·misspoken.· I hope I would have corrected it
`
`12· ·at the time if I said the wrong words, because
`
`13· ·I do remember something got mixed up.
`
`14· · · · · · · · ·But, no, essentially I'm
`
`15· ·sticking completely behind the testimony I
`
`16· ·gave.· But wrong words and things, I might
`
`17· ·have misspoken.
`
`18· · · ·Q.· How many depositions have you given in
`
`19· ·the last five years?
`
`20· · · ·A.· I honestly don't know.· Half a dozen.
`
`21· ·Half a dozen, I would guess.· There were no
`
`22· ·depositions for the UK case.· The only
`
`23· ·depositions I've given are in the US.
`
`24· · · ·Q.· When you say "in the US," you mean for
`
`Page 004 of 199
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.com
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`4
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
`
`
`
`·1· ·proceedings in the United States?
`
`·2· · · ·A.· I mean both in the United States and
`
`·3· ·court procedures.· I haven't done any
`
`·4· ·depositions outside the United States, but,
`
`·5· ·yes, being full proceedings in the United
`
`·6· ·States.
`
`·7· · · ·Q.· How many of those depositions were in
`
`·8· ·your capacity as an expert for Edwards Life
`
`·9· ·Sciences?
`
`10· · · ·A.· Several of them.· In the last five
`
`11· ·years, I believe I've only acted for two
`
`12· ·companies.· One is CR Bard.· And there was a
`
`13· ·trial earlier this year against Gore, and for
`
`14· ·that I gave -- I can't remember if it was one
`
`15· ·or two depositions, but I certainly did a
`
`16· ·deposition.· And then I gave live testimony
`
`17· ·here in Delaware earlier this year.
`
`18· · · · · · · · ·And the other ones are, to the
`
`19· ·best of my recollection, all for Edwards.
`
`20· · · ·Q.· What was the subject matter?· And let
`
`21· ·me just preface this by saying I don't want
`
`22· ·you to reveal any confidential information of
`
`23· ·Bard or the parties in that case, but what was
`
`24· ·the general subject matter of the testimony
`
`Page 005 of 199
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.com
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`5
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
`
`
`
`·1· ·you gave in the Bard case?
`
`·2· · · ·A.· About ePTFE to cover stents.· So it's
`
`·3· ·about what is often called Gortex.· It's a
`
`·4· ·tradename for Gore, and it was about ePTFE
`
`·5· ·thickness or covering stent grafts.
`
`·6· · · ·Q.· Did you represent the patent owner in
`
`·7· ·that case?
`
`·8· · · ·A.· No.· The patent owner was Gore and
`
`·9· ·they were suing Bard, CR Bard for
`
`10· ·infringement, and I was acting for Bard saying
`
`11· ·the patent was invalid and not infringed.· And
`
`12· ·this was in Delaware a few months back.
`
`13· · · ·Q.· Did your testimony discuss the Gore
`
`14· ·extruder?· Is it called the extruder?
`
`15· · · ·A.· No, excluder.· If that is what you
`
`16· ·mean.
`
`17· · · ·Q.· I misspoke.
`
`18· · · ·A.· The AAA device.
`
`19· · · ·Q.· Let me ask a clean question.
`
`20· · · · · · · · ·Did your testimony for Bard at
`
`21· ·the trial earlier this year in Delaware cover
`
`22· ·the Gore excluder?
`
`23· · · ·A.· No.
`
`24· · · ·Q.· Did you discuss in that testimony any
`
`Page 006 of 199
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.com
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`6
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
`
`
`
`·1· ·of the prior art that you have discussed in
`
`·2· ·your declaration in this inter partes review?
`
`·3· · · ·A.· No.· I don't believe as I sit here,
`
`·4· ·but, obviously, there are a lot of documents.
`
`·5· ·I don't believe so.
`
`·6· · · · · · · · ·By prior art, I'm sorry, can I
`
`·7· ·correct that?· There were a few general
`
`·8· ·medical references, things like Lawrence,
`
`·9· ·which is something I talked about.· I think
`
`10· ·was talked about
`
`11· · · · · · · · ·There are a few, obviously my
`
`12· ·background as an interventional cardiologist,
`
`13· ·there's things in that, medical things.· But
`
`14· ·the patents, the prior art, were not the same
`
`15· ·as in this case.
`
`16· · · ·Q.· Roughly, what was the priority date in
`
`17· ·the Gore case, the Bard/Gore case?
`
`18· · · ·A.· Much earlier.· Approximately ten years
`
`19· ·earlier, I think, from memory.· I may be wrong
`
`20· ·on this.· It was around '93.
`
`21· · · ·Q.· In your capacity as an expert for
`
`22· ·Edwards in this inter partes reviews
`
`23· ·proceeding, are you being compensated?
`
`24· · · ·A.· Yes.
`
`Page 007 of 199
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.com
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`7
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
`
`
`
`·1· · · ·Q.· Are you being compensated on an hourly
`
`·2· ·basis?
`
`·3· · · ·A.· Yes.
`
`·4· · · ·Q.· What is your hourly rate?
`
`·5· · · ·A.· Pound sterling, 480 pounds.· I charge
`
`·6· ·and am paid in sterling.
`
`·7· · · ·Q.· Are you being paid by the hour for
`
`·8· ·today's testimony?
`
`·9· · · ·A.· Yes.
`
`10· · · ·Q.· Same rate?
`
`11· · · ·A.· Yes, exactly the same.
`
`12· · · ·Q.· Over the past five years,
`
`13· ·approximately how much compensation have you
`
`14· ·received from Edwards Lifesciences for all of
`
`15· ·your expert work for them?
`
`16· · · ·A.· I honestly don't know.
`
`17· · · ·Q.· Within 500,000 pounds?
`
`18· · · ·A.· Yes, I think probably more than
`
`19· ·500,000 pounds, but I haven't added it up.
`
`20· · · ·Q.· Let's just establish some quick
`
`21· ·shorthands, mostly for the court reporters.
`
`22· · · · · · · · ·The patent at issue in this
`
`23· ·inter partes review proceeding, can we call it
`
`24· ·the '608 patent?
`
`Page 008 of 199
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.com
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`8
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
`
`
`
`·1· · · ·A.· Yes.
`
`·2· · · ·Q.· And you understand what patent I am
`
`·3· ·talking about?
`
`·4· · · ·A.· I do.· I mean it is obviously the one,
`
`·5· ·if you give me a copy, there will be no -- but
`
`·6· ·yes, it is the '608.· I have been in a case
`
`·7· ·where there was another patent with the same
`
`·8· ·numbers, but I know exactly what you are
`
`·9· ·talking about, and I am talking about the '608
`
`10· ·patent.
`
`11· · · ·Q.· The acronym T-A-V-R, TAVR, just for
`
`12· ·the record, what does that stand for?
`
`13· · · ·A.· Transluminal aortic valve replacement.
`
`14· · · ·Q.· Can we also call it transcatheter
`
`15· ·aortic valve replacement?
`
`16· · · ·A.· Yes, you can.
`
`17· · · ·Q.· That is an equally valid
`
`18· ·interpretation of that acronym, transluminal
`
`19· ·versus transcatheter?
`
`20· · · ·A.· Yes, yes.· But the A, you gave the
`
`21· ·acronym, I thought you said "A", T-A-V-R.
`
`22· · · ·Q.· T-A-V-R?
`
`23· · · ·A.· Yes.
`
`24· · · ·Q.· So the "T" can be either transluminal
`
`Page 009 of 199
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.com
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`9
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
`
`
`
`·1· ·or transcatheter, it doesn't matter?
`
`·2· · · ·A.· Yes.
`
`·3· · · ·Q.· And TAVI, what does that mean?
`
`·4· · · ·A.· Just change the replacement for
`
`·5· ·implantation.· Again, it's essentially the
`
`·6· ·same.· It's a slightly different acronym.
`
`·7· ·There are a whole range of these acronyms
`
`·8· ·which are used interchangeably for the same
`
`·9· ·sort of procedure.· Transcatheter aortic valve
`
`10· ·replacement is probably one of the more common
`
`11· ·ones.
`
`12· · · ·Q.· TAVR and TAVI are used interchangeably
`
`13· ·for essentially the same procedure?
`
`14· · · ·A.· I think they are, yes.
`
`15· · · ·Q.· Today can we just use TAVI?
`
`16· · · ·A.· I'm happy.
`
`17· · · ·Q.· Generally speaking, what is a TAVR
`
`18· ·procedure?
`
`19· · · ·A.· Today, or meaning as of today?
`
`20· · · ·Q.· Yes.
`
`21· · · ·A.· It's a procedure in which a
`
`22· ·replacement valve is put inside the body,
`
`23· ·typically into the heart, using a catheter and
`
`24· ·is most often used to treat aortic stenosis.
`
`Page 010 of 199
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.com
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`10
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
`
`
`
`·1· ·So that's the most common TAVR procedure.
`
`·2· ·There are other ones used in other locations.
`
`·3· · · ·Q.· Like in the pulmonic valve, for
`
`·4· ·example?
`
`·5· · · ·A.· Yes.· The device, if you like, even
`
`·6· ·though it is called aortic, they are
`
`·7· ·occasionally put in other places and inside
`
`·8· ·other valves.· But the vast majority of them
`
`·9· ·are put in to replace aortic valves in
`
`10· ·patients that have degenerative process and
`
`11· ·old age referred to as calcific stenosis.
`
`12· ·That would be the majority of ones that are
`
`13· ·done today.
`
`14· · · ·Q.· Now, when I asked you what is a TAVR
`
`15· ·procedure and you said, you asked me when I
`
`16· ·was referring to, would your definition change
`
`17· ·if I had said what is a TAVR procedure in
`
`18· ·2004?
`
`19· · · ·A.· Well, yes, because by then it wasn't
`
`20· ·commercialized, and I would probably talk
`
`21· ·about the very few individuals you had
`
`22· ·experience of, and most notably Alain Cribier.
`
`23· ·A-L-A-I-N, Cribier.
`
`24· · · ·Q.· C-R-I-B-I-E-R?
`
`Page 011 of 199
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.com
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`11
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
`
`
`
`·1· · · ·A.· Correct.
`
`·2· · · · · · · · ·So it would change in that this
`
`·3· ·procedure is in medical terms a fairly new
`
`·4· ·procedure, and at the time that he did the
`
`·5· ·first TAVR procedure, he was the only person
`
`·6· ·that had done it and it wasn't a commonly used
`
`·7· ·procedure.· Therefore, I am not sure people
`
`·8· ·would be using the term.· It was something
`
`·9· ·that he did first in the early 2000's.
`
`10· · · ·Q.· Do you know if the acronym TAVR was in
`
`11· ·common use by 2004?
`
`12· · · · · · · · ·MR. EGAN:· Objection to form.
`
`13· · · · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· It depends what
`
`14· ·you mean by "common" really.· I don't think I
`
`15· ·know whether that particular acronym was being
`
`16· ·used commonly.· It probably was used, but, I
`
`17· ·mean, it depends what you mean by commonly,
`
`18· ·because in 2004 these procedures are very new
`
`19· ·and people are interested in them, such as
`
`20· ·myself, may well have come across it.· But it
`
`21· ·wouldn't necessarily be something that was in
`
`22· ·the wider domain.
`
`23· ·BY MR. COHN:
`
`24· · · ·Q.· So just make sure I understand what
`
`Page 012 of 199
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.com
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`12
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
`
`
`
`·1· ·you are saying.· In June 2004, TAVR was a
`
`·2· ·fairly new procedure; is that right?
`
`·3· · · ·A.· Yes.
`
`·4· · · ·Q.· And by that time, only one person in
`
`·5· ·the whole world had performed TAVR procedures
`
`·6· ·in human beings, is that right, and that is
`
`·7· ·Dr. Cribier?
`
`·8· · · ·A.· Yes, Dr. Cribier is the main one. I
`
`·9· ·think by 2004 there may have been another
`
`10· ·person in the United States who had attempted
`
`11· ·them.· But again, it's difficult to answer
`
`12· ·your question, what detail you go into.
`
`13· · · · · · · · ·The way Alain Cribier did the
`
`14· ·first ones was a very different route.· He
`
`15· ·went up through the veins, across the septum.
`
`16· ·He went a route that we sometimes refer to as
`
`17· ·antegrade.
`
`18· · · · · · · · ·What I described to you earlier
`
`19· ·is, what's done today is almost always done
`
`20· ·retrograde, going against the flow of blood,
`
`21· ·coming up the aorta and into the valve.· So
`
`22· ·there are things that have changed.· And you
`
`23· ·can refer to them, and people might have, as
`
`24· ·TAVR, going back that far to 2004, but a lot
`
`Page 013 of 199
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.com
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`13
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
`
`
`
`·1· ·about the procedure, the devices has changed.
`
`·2· · · ·Q.· In 2004, I think you said that Alain
`
`·3· ·Cribier had performed TAVR procedures and
`
`·4· ·possibly another person in the US?
`
`·5· · · ·A.· Yes.
`
`·6· · · ·Q.· Who was that other person?
`
`·7· · · ·A.· I can't remember, but I think there
`
`·8· ·was someone else by the US.
`
`·9· · · · · · · · ·And there are other valve
`
`10· ·implantations done, pulmonary ones, by a
`
`11· ·gentleman called Bonhoeffer, which are, if you
`
`12· ·like -- if you take the "A" out of
`
`13· ·transluminal valve implantation, it was done
`
`14· ·by others, including Bonhoeffer.
`
`15· · · · · · · · ·So it's all around, the interest
`
`16· ·in putting heart valves in by percutaneous
`
`17· ·transcatheter techniques really came to life
`
`18· ·in the early 2000's and different people
`
`19· ·working on pulmonary valves, from aortic
`
`20· ·valves, and Alain Cribier was the first to
`
`21· ·perform an aortic valve implantation, but he
`
`22· ·did it by a different technique than the one
`
`23· ·that was commonly used.
`
`24· · · ·Q.· Now, if we expand our discussion
`
`Page 014 of 199
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.com
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`14
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
`
`
`
`·1· ·beyond just the aorta to talk about
`
`·2· ·transcatheter valve replacement --
`
`·3· · · ·A.· Yes.
`
`·4· · · ·Q.· -- any valve in the heart, would you
`
`·5· ·still have characterized that as a fairly new
`
`·6· ·procedure by June of 2004?
`
`·7· · · · · · · · ·MR. EGAN:· Objection to form.
`
`·8· · · · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Yes.· It was a
`
`·9· ·fairly new -- as I say, there were other
`
`10· ·groups, including most notably Bonhoeffer's
`
`11· ·group.· By 2004 I think he was in London.
`
`12· ·He's a French -- he was a French doctor.· And
`
`13· ·he was putting in pulmonary valves using a
`
`14· ·different device which he had been involved in
`
`15· ·developing.
`
`16· ·BY MR. COHN:
`
`17· · · ·Q.· By June 2004, had any regulatory body
`
`18· ·approved for the commercial sale a
`
`19· ·transcatheter replacement valve for any valve
`
`20· ·in the heart?
`
`21· · · ·A.· I don't believe so.
`
`22· · · ·Q.· Has there been any approval by a
`
`23· ·regulatory body for the commercial sale of a
`
`24· ·transcatheter pulmonic replacement valve?
`
`Page 015 of 199
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.com
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`15
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
`
`
`
`·1· · · · · · · · ·MR. EGAN:· Objection to the
`
`·2· ·form.
`
`·3· · · · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Today?
`
`·4· ·BY MR. COHN:
`
`·5· · · ·Q.· Today?
`
`·6· · · ·A.· Yes.
`
`·7· · · ·Q.· What approval is that, what valve is
`
`·8· ·that for the pulmonary?
`
`·9· · · ·A.· The Melody valve is the valve that was
`
`10· ·subsequently commercialized, which is related
`
`11· ·to the original work that Bonhoeffer did, and
`
`12· ·I think it is now, today, marketed by
`
`13· ·Medtronic.
`
`14· · · ·Q.· Are any of Edwards' transcatheter
`
`15· ·valve products approved by any regulatory body
`
`16· ·to be used in the pulmonic valve?
`
`17· · · · · · · · ·MR. EGAN:· Objection to form and
`
`18· ·relevance.
`
`19· · · · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· The answer to
`
`20· ·that, there are so many different countries
`
`21· ·and regulatory authorities, I just don't know
`
`22· ·the answer.
`
`23· ·BY MR. COHN:
`
`24· · · ·Q.· Are you aware of any that have
`
`Page 016 of 199
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.com
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`16
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
`
`
`
`·1· ·approved any Edwards' valve for the pulmonic
`
`·2· ·valve?
`
`·3· · · · · · · · ·MR. EGAN:· Objection.
`
`·4· ·Relevance, form.
`
`·5· · · · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· As I just said,
`
`·6· ·I'm not.· But I don't know that, I don't know
`
`·7· ·that there are not.
`
`·8· ·BY MR. COHN:
`
`·9· · · ·Q.· Now, you talked about Dr. Cribier had
`
`10· ·performed an antegrade approach with his valve
`
`11· ·replacements in the aorta by June 2004; is
`
`12· ·that right?
`
`13· · · ·A.· Correct.
`
`14· · · ·Q.· What is the difference between an
`
`15· ·antegrade approach and a retrograde approach?
`
`16· · · ·A.· Well, in brief, to go antegrade,
`
`17· ·you're going with the flow of blood and,
`
`18· ·therefore, you go typically up a vein in the
`
`19· ·leg, and you go up to the heart the direction
`
`20· ·the blood returns to the heart.· And then you
`
`21· ·have to cross over from the right side of the
`
`22· ·heart to the left side of the heart, and you
`
`23· ·make a hole with a needle and then stretch it
`
`24· ·up with a balloon to do that.· Then you go
`
`Page 017 of 199
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.com
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`17
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
`
`
`
`·1· ·into the left side of the heart, and you go
`
`·2· ·into the aortic valve from the direction of
`
`·3· ·the ventricle towards the aorta.
`
`·4· · · · · · · · ·So it is a more difficult, more
`
`·5· ·complex procedure in some respects because you
`
`·6· ·are traveling a lot longer distance, and you
`
`·7· ·are putting the valve into the same position,
`
`·8· ·into the subcoronary aortic position, but
`
`·9· ·you're doing it via this so-called antegrade
`
`10· ·route.
`
`11· · · · · · · · ·And that is what Alain Cribier
`
`12· ·did for the first half dozen or so procedures
`
`13· ·that he performed.
`
`14· · · ·Q.· And the first half dozen or so
`
`15· ·procedures that Dr. Cribier performed were all
`
`16· ·before June 2004?
`
`17· · · · · · · · ·MR. EGAN:· Objection to form.
`
`18· · · · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· I don't know the
`
`19· ·exact number.· There were that sort of number
`
`20· ·of procedures that he and his group performed
`
`21· ·before 2004.
`
`22· ·BY MR. COHN:
`
`23· · · ·Q.· As far as you are aware, had anyone in
`
`24· ·the world performed a retrograde approach for
`
`Page 018 of 199
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.com
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`18
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
`
`
`
`·1· ·a transcatheter aortic valve replacement
`
`·2· ·before June 2004?
`
`·3· · · ·A.· I don't know the answer to that, I'm
`
`·4· ·afraid.
`
`·5· · · ·Q.· You are not aware of any such
`
`·6· ·procedures sitting here today?
`
`·7· · · ·A.· Well, I'm talking about in my
`
`·8· ·answer -- sorry, I should have prefaced it --
`
`·9· ·it is involved in patients, to treat patients.
`
`10· · · · · · · · ·In animals, yes, they had.
`
`11· ·Experimental work and animal work was
`
`12· ·definitely being done, and I'm aware of it, in
`
`13· ·that case right back to Andersen's work,
`
`14· ·Henning Rudd Andersen.
`
`15· · · · · · · · ·But I'm not, as I sit here
`
`16· ·today, aware as to whether anyone had
`
`17· ·performed a retrograde procedure before
`
`18· ·June 2004.
`
`19· · · ·Q.· Before June 2004, it is your testimony
`
`20· ·that retrograde TAVR procedures had been
`
`21· ·performed in animals?
`
`22· · · ·A.· Well, I don't know whether you call
`
`23· ·them TAVR procedures because they are
`
`24· ·experimental.
`
`Page 019 of 199
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.com
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`19
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
`
`
`
`·1· · · · · · · · ·I mean, again, the terminology
`
`·2· ·I'm not sure was used back then.· But
`
`·3· ·experimental work, put valves in going
`
`·4· ·retrogradely in experimental procedures, you
`
`·5· ·often don't start down the leg of the animal.
`
`·6· ·You may go into the aorta.· But they are being
`
`·7· ·put in retrogradely, coming up the aorta and
`
`·8· ·around into the aortic position, against the
`
`·9· ·flow of blood.· That had been done
`
`10· ·experimentally, yes.
`
`11· · · ·Q.· And when you said that these
`
`12· ·procedures were done not through the leg of
`
`13· ·the animal, how was the device implanted into
`
`14· ·the aorta and then into the heart valve?
`
`15· · · ·A.· Sometimes for ease it would be put
`
`16· ·directly into the aorta but down below the
`
`17· ·diaphragm.· So to get in, because the devices
`
`18· ·were a certain size, animals have quite small
`
`19· ·blood vessels in the leg, so it would go into
`
`20· ·the aorta and then continue up the aorta.
`
`21· · · ·Q.· In your entire career, you have never
`
`22· ·performed a TAVR procedure on a human patient;
`
`23· ·is that correct?
`
`24· · · ·A.· Correct.
`
`Page 020 of 199
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.com
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`20
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
`
`
`
`·1· · · ·Q.· And you have never performed any
`
`·2· ·transcatheter or transluminal valve
`
`·3· ·replacement procedure on a human patient?
`
`·4· · · ·A.· Replacement procedure, no, I've never
`
`·5· ·performed.
`
`·6· · · ·Q.· And you have never performed a valve
`
`·7· ·replacement procedure on an animal; is that
`
`·8· ·correct?
`
`·9· · · ·A.· Correct.
`
`10· · · ·Q.· And you have never deployed a TAVR
`
`11· ·device in a bench test or in any setting; is
`
`12· ·that right?
`
`13· · · ·A.· I have deployed TAVR devices in bench
`
`14· ·tests, yes.· I've examined devices and
`
`15· ·equipment and I have deployed some.· But I
`
`16· ·have never treated a patient and I have never
`
`17· ·implanted one in an animal.· But I have
`
`18· ·inspected and looked at devices, including
`
`19· ·deploying some.
`
`20· · · · · · · · ·By "deploy," I mean on the
`
`21· ·bench.· I mean not into an animal or human
`
`22· ·tissue.
`
`23· · · ·Q.· When you say "on the bench" -- well,
`
`24· ·let's back up.
`
`Page 021 of 199
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.com
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`21
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
`
`
`
`·1· · · · · · · · ·In the devices that you have
`
`·2· ·deployed, TAVR devices on the bench, were they
`
`·3· ·being deployed in air or were they in some
`
`·4· ·sort of a fixture or a model or something like
`
`·5· ·that?
`
`·6· · · · · · · · ·MR. EGAN:· Objection.· Compound.
`
`·7· · · · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Water bath, I
`
`·8· ·think.· So under water, a water bath.· But I'm
`
`·9· ·not sure what you mean by a fixture.· I didn't
`
`10· ·quite understand what you meant in the
`
`11· ·question by a fixture in a tank, which would
`
`12· ·be...
`
`13· ·BY MR. COHN:
`
`14· · · ·Q.· How many times have you deployed a
`
`15· ·transcatheter valve replacement device?
`
`16· · · ·A.· Very few.· I mean a couple.
`
`17· · · ·Q.· Twice?
`
`18· · · ·A.· Two, three, four.
`
`19· · · ·Q.· Less than five?
`
`20· · · ·A.· I think that is fair.
`
`21· · · ·Q.· And the times that you deployed a
`
`22· ·transcatheter valve device, it was always in a
`
`23· ·water bath?
`
`24· · · ·A.· No, it wasn't always in a water bath,
`
`Page 022 of 199
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.com
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`22
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
`
`
`
`·1· ·but the majority have been in a water bath to
`
`·2· ·keep -- look at the valve and to do it with
`
`·3· ·something approaching body temperature.
`
`·4· · · ·Q.· And these deployments of a
`
`·5· ·transcatheter valve device that you did on the
`
`·6· ·bench -- is that how you characterize it, on
`
`·7· ·the bench?
`
`·8· · · ·A.· Yes, broadly.· I mean, that's an
`
`·9· ·expression, meaning outside a patient.
`
`10· ·Experimental, just inspecting it.· So on a
`
`11· ·bench, yes, that's fair.
`
`12· · · ·Q.· The transcatheter valve devices that
`
`13· ·you deployed on the bench, was that in
`
`14· ·conjunction with your work as an expert in a
`
`15· ·litigation?
`
`16· · · ·A.· Some of it was and some of it wasn't.
`
`17· ·Just a medical meeting.· So both.
`
`18· · · ·Q.· The deployment of a transcatheter
`
`19· ·valve device that you did as part of a medical
`
`20· ·meeting, was that in 2013?
`
`21· · · ·A.· I certainly did.· That is the training
`
`22· ·course, the Edwards training course that I
`
`23· ·went to in New York.· And, yes, certainly
`
`24· ·there was one I deployed during that meeting.
`
`Page 023 of 199
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.com
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`23
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
`
`
`
`·1· · · ·Q.· Had you deployed a TAVR device on the
`
`·2· ·bench prior to 2013 other than in your
`
`·3· ·capacity as a litigation expert?
`
`·4· · · ·A.· Yes, at a medical meeting.
`
`·5· · · ·Q.· When was that medical meeting?
`
`·6· · · ·A.· I honestly don't remember.
`
`·7· · · ·Q.· Was it after 2007?
`
`·8· · · ·A.· I would guess, sitting here, it was
`
`·9· ·after 2010, I would guess.
`
`10· · · ·Q.· Do you agree it was certainly after
`
`11· ·2007?
`
`12· · · ·A.· Well, I have agreed.· I think I said
`
`13· ·after 2010, so that is by definition after
`
`14· ·2007.
`
`15· · · ·Q.· What was the transcatheter valve
`
`16· ·device that you deployed at a medical meeting
`
`17· ·some time after 2010?
`
`18· · · ·A.· CoreValve device, the Medtronic
`
`19· ·CoreValve device is one I remember.
`
`20· · · ·Q.· At the time that you did that
`
`21· ·deployment, you had been retained as an expert
`
`22· ·in litigation for Edwards around the
`
`23· ·CoreValve; right?
`
`24· · · · · · · · ·MR. EGAN:· Objection.
`
`Page 024 of 199
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.com
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`24
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
`
`
`
`·1· ·Foundation.
`
`·2· · · · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Yes.· I'm trying
`
`·3· ·to think how long, how far back that was, but
`
`·4· ·that was around 2007, yes.
`
`·5· ·BY MR. COHN:
`
`·6· · · ·Q.· Was that the first time, that
`
`·7· ·CoreValve deployment that you just mentioned
`
`·8· ·at the medical meeting, that you had deployed
`
`·9· ·a TAVR device in your career?
`
`10· · · ·A.· I can't remember whether I deployed an
`
`11· ·Edwards one.· Just as I sit here can't
`
`12· ·remember, so I can't answer that.· I don't
`
`13· ·know.
`
`14· · · ·Q.· When was the first time that you
`
`15· ·recall deploying a transcatheter valve device
`
`16· ·in your entire life?
`
`17· · · ·A.· Well, as I say, I don't think the
`
`18· ·CoreValve one was before 2010, and I think I
`
`19· ·may well have deployed an Edwards one,
`
`20· ·bench-top deployment before then, but I
`
`21· ·honestly can't remember the year.
`
`22· · · ·Q.· It would have been after 2007 that you
`
`23· ·did that; right?
`
`24· · · ·A.· I can't remember the year.
`
`Page 025 of 199
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.com
`
`NIGEL P. BULLER, M.D.
`Edwards Lifesciences v Boston Scientific Scimed
`
`June 15, 2017
`25
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.comYVer1f
`
`
`
`·1· · · ·Q.· Could it have been before 2007?
`
`·2·
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
