throbber
n
`
`
`
`
`Ari-A‘Ji-e"'1"...ell.
`
`:tl.
`
`.\..'.n‘neki.’
`
`TransluminaUy-placed Coilspring
`- Endanerial Tube Grafts
`
`Technique for Penmtaneons, momma '
`Placement of Tubes within Arteries
`
`Long-term Potency in Canine Poplt’teal
`Artery
`‘
`Quail—£3.12 Dan-m, MD
`
`msumrmu. comm nun-nonf- 3 arm: A
`simple. rational and efiedtive (90% lasting
`patency) alternative to conventional .vascular sur-
`gery in the relief of primary atheromatoue narrow-
`ing. Unfortunately.
`secondary lamina!
`throm-
`botis often complicates the disease,
`leaving no
`lumen to dilate. The results of transluminal re-
`anallzation (catheter creation of a neolumeu
`through a completely occluded segment) under-
`atandably are not in a. class with those of dilata-
`tlon. While tpectaeular and lasting sumeasee have
`been adtieved by atheter teauallndon. vein
`grafting remains the treatment 0! choice {or long-
`segment femompopllzeal occlusion. In a contin-
`uing etiort to improve matters, a method for the
`perwtaneous introduction and transluminal phoe-
`ment of tubular prosthaee was developed and
`tinted in dogs. The prompt thrombosis of all in»
`pervlous tube: so placed led to the fabrication and
`trial 0! collspring equivalents. .
`_...~__.__.._..
`Work done in the Stella and Charles Gunman Insti-
`tute {or Vascular lie-earth through Radiology at the
`vulva-xi
`of Oregon Medical School. Portland. Oregon,
`wasaldc gmuhom USPHSJIEDSZ” andHE
`06536. the
`Heart Auodatiun and the George
`Alfred Cook finned“.
`Much work by other: it mwmplaued in this brief
`report. S
`'11 thank: ere due:
`. Anzac. N. Day.
`G. Flue
`J. Heat-n. '1‘. Hutddns. W. Massey. J. Pegg.
`J. Penningto M. Quart). M. Robinson.
`'1‘. Sexual
`and J. Sdtenk.
`
`Using a suitable remote entry site and_oonven-
`tlonal techniques, a guideathetcr is first placed
`so that in tip traverses the intended graft tile.
`The tubular prosthetic graft and pusher-catheter
`at similar comedian are then slipped on and
`advanced over the guldeiutheter until the graft
`'has been seated as desired. Withdnwal of inner
`gulde'and pusher-'uthctert completes the proce-
`dure' (Fig. 1).:Cana should be taken to avoid
`trauma and arterial spasm. Though it is yet to
`he done, tranxlumlnal graft placement at a site or
`arterial disease all: for preliminary preparation
`through dilatttlonor rccenalintion of the nar-
`rowed o_r occluded lumen. The leading end of the
`gait should be smoothly rounded to as to mini-
`mize any tendency to ploughup an atherotnatous
`mus-oz.
`-
`
`. To date, the above technique has been med to
`.plaoe grafts in the normal {moral or popliteal
`arteries of 25 dogs. The usual site of entry was
`the left carotid artery; though it was not essential,
`arterlotomy generally was used for catheter intro-
`duction The tubular prostheses used varied hum
`one to ten centimeters in length and one to three
`millimeters
`in outer diameter. Regardless of
`whether they were made of polyethylene,. poly-
`amlde, Silastic or Teflon, no impervious plastic
`tube graft remained patent longer than 24 hours.
`Since graft patenq was not an initial objective
`of the work, anticoagulants were not. used in con-
`junction with the_placement of a total of 19 plastic
`tubular prostheses. follow-upeogiogmphy showed
`that occlusion was usually within thefim twenty-
`four hours and pathologt'e examination revealed it
`due to thrombosis.
`-
`
`329
`
`pre-
`
`
`
`Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, et a]. Exhibit 1112, Page 1 of 4
`
`Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, et al. Exhibit 1112, Page 1 of 4
`
`

`

`
`
`
`,”a.4—h-huk...“‘2.
`
`
`‘..31
`
`
`
`
`
`translumimzl placement 0]. Iubular firmlhuit within
`{summon-c,
`fro. I. Technique for
`
`
`Hood #5214: Abovuguldc introduced lhxough entry needle. Cartier; guide moss nmowlng,
`catheter puahc: misc graft toward Intended site. Below: withdrawal on guide and whom- have:
`
`graft- ip. place.
`
`
`; poilspring truism-aw presumes
`In the six final experiments, Instead of impel-r
`Mica: pia'sticvtubing, the grammar: in the folrm
`~91 whom; qfich-Qenlercd coilspxings wound from
`N0. 5 stainless steel wine. win: an auger dinmczer
`o! ”0.14 indxa and.’ ranging in length from 1
`to
`10 cin (Fig. 2). ngarin was given u'mi) occlusion
`occurred, m- for Tour days after grahihg. A )O-cm.
`a 3mm and-a l-tm silimnwomcd giaf! were found .
`occluded the following day. Two out at three Inn
`09339:! l—cm milsprings rennin patent at, two and
`‘a half years} and mm and a quarter ycnrs follow-
`ing in‘scnion..35 show'n on serial follow-u? angiw
`-grzms (Fig; 3.‘ i). '
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`..
`,. .,.
`._,_
`.
`,,
`. Tubular tempting mufowuculdr pmxllnasis.
`31c.
`I! 0.! 9‘.
`.
`v.
`‘
`..
`'
`-
`.
`
`glam: w¢r¢§°$.1;;glw "ed “in Suwasfu) Sm
`
`.
`7. ED'isCussiox'x-
`' This “1’9" mafia“; n 5mple, basic technique
`fox the .lmfls‘lm‘lfinal pincement of tubular endo-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, et a]. Exhibit 1112, Page 2 of 4
`
`Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, et al. Exhibit 1112, Page 2 of 4
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`. I‘4
`l ‘t
`
`l5
`
`‘i,-
`0.‘r.1‘
`
`we,
`ell carotid artery _
`FIG‘ 3. Meyenf'pn-li‘ni‘)‘.¢:7f_7:cnr collspgingjgrm 91,954 .w'g¢'g¢m [mm .1
`in 49-90mm 119507.531 Dls‘t’al tnlgmtlon tool; 'plzoe on day of implantation (relate o! @2311?) .
`but there was no~tbbsequmt change ln posltlon-or.patcncy.

`
`
`
`5
`
`«mania—'3-
`
`"anus—ea:>..-.».:
`
`vascular ptosthcsee and point: to possible mlvitm
`tags of open eoilspring' construction. Any. prob-
`.thesls capable of long-term pateney in the amine
`femoralsystem warrants attention; though. a: Kin-
`mouth. 3R_ob a‘ntl‘ Simeone point out,
`'f1t appears
`that thesueceispr failure of an arterial substitutgc
`-in dogs bears’no direct relationship to-tlre results
`one wfll-obtaln (when -a aslmila; substitute 1: used
`clinically [or the pefiplieral arteries?!
`Th'e‘suctcsafdt catheters’ lnjhe matingemem oi.
`atheromntous narrowing sliows— t'lle' feisibflltroi
`at tramlumlnal attack:
`their. shortcoming: .ln the»
`ptesenee ol’ complete occlusion jun/e anphuslzed
`the need for J’unher improvement, a..long-ung‘c
`objective of the present investigation. Porstmsmn's
`Succes‘sl’ul uafisluxninal plugging,“ 25 consecutive
`patent ductl= wlthout thoncotbmy'"~ntld§- dmtimt‘lt'
`confirmation. to the basic thesis that what can be
`better accomplished without operative exposure
`should be.
`
`Theoretic advantages or translumlnally-plnced
`coilsprlug vascular line: prostheses include:
`the
`Internally-gutted ~segment of vessel
`is not
`re-
`moved,
`incised or even exposed,
`thus avoiding
`trauma to 'an already diseased vessel. Blood‘ loss
`at
`the treatedyite, perivascular hemaroma and
`sutures or: not- likely to cause difiiculty. Open“
`coil construction permits prompt fibroblattlc en-
`velopment and the-rapid formation cl a new.
`firmly andtor’cd, autoge'nous-lining surface, thereby
`favoring continuing patcncy. Pi‘omtype models
`have shown thit-‘coiltptings, either wretched out
`or wound up and hooked ton conu'olling man-
`drel; an be‘reduced in diametex. favoring their
`easy Introduction and placement. Upon their
`cattemallyelfected~trelease from the man‘drelpthey
`automatically ekpand for a bigger
`lumen and
`betteranchorlng at the site of placement. Should
`progresssnnd hmh’er experimental work ever lead
`to a .cllnlcal role'l’or transluminal gutting. it Scents
`
`Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, et a]. Exhibit 1112, Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.-.-rI-kvurhfu.w....--
`
`Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, et al. Exhibit 1112, Page 3 of 4
`
`

`

`bum“.
`
`;xamn;~.u;«h...'-'
`
` .-A:
`
`
`
`.....:.;...,._."nu-L...4...:
`
`‘
`
`
`
`3541,. 1549.627 ézalmq. fifilifinai‘bilffifin‘gfigmflyloxfl' bamlufiufihlIy-jgom is]: carotid ark???
`.‘v'
`1;; 4433mm 405159411). Na change (gnawing lama! ponplz‘t'zmcma-niig'fidon. can dbes not
`obsuuct adjaunubnndaet.
`
`c1
`
`."
`
`
`
`pbéfiblc-thfir me‘ 'dgmmd for Miami mu 'may
`b'e-deiinbly Iea-th‘ariflxat now rcquimd= for. com-
`pttént 'vaSCulfl‘r surgery.
`
`Kn filo-nit: grill, nmuia- dilmdon, confining, {amoro-
`p'opfltcnl, occlusion.
`1:147“? for :mapondma: CharkLT. Dom-r,
`=MD,, Deparlmzm of Radiology, University a]
`arixan-'Mzaicqii.9cfiboz, 333131;! Sam Jack'mn
`Parfi'flohdx'l’bfflimd, 012.9720!
`.
`unwary
`‘ Linen“; c. '1'... and 'M. P. Juékins: cfvculalima
`30:6“; 1964.
`_
`_
`,
`' 2,--—-.
`. Rdsah andzM. 1’. judkin}; Stu-g. Gynu.
`0mm. 127:7 , was.
`_
`Z
`3. Monmouth. J. 8., C. 0. Rob nnd.7. .A. Simeoncz
`Vascular surgery. Balfirootchwmiaw nnd Wilkins
`figfififih
`=
`.
`. Nmmmn, Von 'WW'J. Wicmy and 5}}, Wamkc:
`Forudrr. Rmtngtr. 109;)”, 1968.:
`‘
`
`'
`
`Sn
`
`,.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`_
`
`'Ifubgjl'az pxoszhetins graltggigmo'duged N19. .mdd
`‘aitgries ch p’fqocd mns‘luminzuyfin [Cinem-
`pgplircal anm'ts in £51105: usihg gimpk c'athqzer
`technique: While wioul lmptrvigu: pmu'e: tubes
`dorm! pmgupd'y,
`th‘e adoption of an open coil-
`.spxing cpnfiguntion has made vppssible buggers:
`pancy. Advantagu qt
`this yolfiemially :35:qu
`afp'mazu indudg' madam from xii: trauma many-
`anodized: with su'igi'cui mint “construction.
`
`a.”F.f—‘*—-lv'—Mfi—3fffwfi.p_‘..
`
`
`Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, et a]. Exhibit 1112, Page 4 of 4
`
`Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, et al. Exhibit 1112, Page 4 of 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket