throbber
From:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`Date:
`
`Trials
`Harp, Jason G.; Trials
`Hartman, Stacie; Noll, Steven; Rammer, Thomas A.; "garret.leach@kirkland.com"; "eric.hayes@kirkland.com";
`"eugene.goryunov@kirkland.com"; "kyle.kantarek@kirkland.com"
`RE: Technical Consumer Products v. Lighting Science Group; IPR2017-01285
`Wednesday, November 22, 2017 11:02:59 AM
`
`Counsel,
`
`The panel has convened and is not persuaded that the changes contemplated by Petitioner are directed to
`fixing typographical errors, as covered by 37 C.F.R. 42.5(a).
`
`Regards,
`
`Andrew Kellogg,
`Supervisory Paralegal
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`USPTO
`andrew.kellogg@uspto.gov
`Direct: 571-272-5366



`From: Harp, Jason G. [mailto:JHarp@schiffhardin.com] 
`Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 4:36 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Hartman, Stacie <SHartman@schiffhardin.com>; Noll, Steven <snoll@schiffhardin.com>;
`Rammer, Thomas A. <TRammer@schiffhardin.com>; 'garret.leach@kirkland.com'
`<garret.leach@kirkland.com>; 'eric.hayes@kirkland.com' <eric.hayes@kirkland.com>;
`'eugene.goryunov@kirkland.com' <eugene.goryunov@kirkland.com>; 'kyle.kantarek@kirkland.com'
`<kyle.kantarek@kirkland.com>
`Subject: Technical Consumer Products v. Lighting Science Group; IPR2017-01285

`Dear Board,
`
`We represent Petitioners in IPR2017-01285 and write to request permission to file a motion
`under 37 C.F.R. § 42.104(c) to correct the petition and to modify the institution decision in
`that proceeding under 37 C.F.R. § 42.5(a). If authorized, the motion would relate to
`Grounds III and VI in the petition addressing invalidity of dependent claim 10 of the ‘518
`patent. The Board instituted review of independent claim 1, from which claim 10 depends.
`Specifically, we are seeking permission to file a substitute petition and declaration of Dr.
`Coleman that make the reference to the Wegner prior art in Grounds III and VI more
`explicit. The changes would amount to no more than adding the word “Wegner” to those
`two grounds and to corresponding portions of Dr. Coleman’s declaration. Our motion also
`would seek modification of the Board’s decision not to institute review of claim 10 in light of
`the corrected Grounds III and VI. Patent owner opposes this motion.
`
`Best regards,
`Jason
`
`
`
`Jason G. Harp
`
`1
`
`Petitioners’ Ex. 1027
`Technical Consumer Products et al. v. Lighting Science Group, IPR2017-01285
`
`

`

`Counsel 
`jharp@schiffhardin.com 
`d +1.312.258.5770 | f +1.312.258.5600 
`
`Schiff Hardin LLP 
`233 South Wacker Drive | Suite 7100 | Chicago, IL 60606 
`schiffhardin.com | v-card | view bio
`
`-------------------------------------------------------------------
`This message and any attachments may contain confidential
`information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege.
`If you believe that it has been sent to you in error,
`please reply to the sender that you received the message in
`error. Then delete it. Thank you.
`-------------------------------------------------------------------
`
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket