`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`Date:
`
`Trials
`Harp, Jason G.; Trials
`Hartman, Stacie; Noll, Steven; Rammer, Thomas A.; "garret.leach@kirkland.com"; "eric.hayes@kirkland.com";
`"eugene.goryunov@kirkland.com"; "kyle.kantarek@kirkland.com"
`RE: Technical Consumer Products v. Lighting Science Group; IPR2017-01285
`Wednesday, November 22, 2017 11:02:59 AM
`
`Counsel,
`
`The panel has convened and is not persuaded that the changes contemplated by Petitioner are directed to
`fixing typographical errors, as covered by 37 C.F.R. 42.5(a).
`
`Regards,
`
`Andrew Kellogg,
`Supervisory Paralegal
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`USPTO
`andrew.kellogg@uspto.gov
`Direct: 571-272-5366
`
`
`
`From: Harp, Jason G. [mailto:JHarp@schiffhardin.com]
`Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 4:36 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Hartman, Stacie <SHartman@schiffhardin.com>; Noll, Steven <snoll@schiffhardin.com>;
`Rammer, Thomas A. <TRammer@schiffhardin.com>; 'garret.leach@kirkland.com'
`<garret.leach@kirkland.com>; 'eric.hayes@kirkland.com' <eric.hayes@kirkland.com>;
`'eugene.goryunov@kirkland.com' <eugene.goryunov@kirkland.com>; 'kyle.kantarek@kirkland.com'
`<kyle.kantarek@kirkland.com>
`Subject: Technical Consumer Products v. Lighting Science Group; IPR2017-01285
`
`Dear Board,
`
`We represent Petitioners in IPR2017-01285 and write to request permission to file a motion
`under 37 C.F.R. § 42.104(c) to correct the petition and to modify the institution decision in
`that proceeding under 37 C.F.R. § 42.5(a). If authorized, the motion would relate to
`Grounds III and VI in the petition addressing invalidity of dependent claim 10 of the ‘518
`patent. The Board instituted review of independent claim 1, from which claim 10 depends.
`Specifically, we are seeking permission to file a substitute petition and declaration of Dr.
`Coleman that make the reference to the Wegner prior art in Grounds III and VI more
`explicit. The changes would amount to no more than adding the word “Wegner” to those
`two grounds and to corresponding portions of Dr. Coleman’s declaration. Our motion also
`would seek modification of the Board’s decision not to institute review of claim 10 in light of
`the corrected Grounds III and VI. Patent owner opposes this motion.
`
`Best regards,
`Jason
`
`
`
`Jason G. Harp
`
`1
`
`Petitioners’ Ex. 1027
`Technical Consumer Products et al. v. Lighting Science Group, IPR2017-01285
`
`
`
`Counsel
`jharp@schiffhardin.com
`d +1.312.258.5770 | f +1.312.258.5600
`
`Schiff Hardin LLP
`233 South Wacker Drive | Suite 7100 | Chicago, IL 60606
`schiffhardin.com | v-card | view bio
`
`-------------------------------------------------------------------
`This message and any attachments may contain confidential
`information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege.
`If you believe that it has been sent to you in error,
`please reply to the sender that you received the message in
`error. Then delete it. Thank you.
`-------------------------------------------------------------------
`
`
`2
`
`