`571-272-7822
`
` IPR2017-01225 Paper No. 10
`IPR2017-01226 Paper No. 10
` Date Entered: September 29, 2017
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`ATI TECHNOLOGIES ULC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-01225
`Patent 8,760,454 B2
`Case IPR2017-01226
`Patent 9,582,846 B21
`____________
`
`
`
`
`Before JONI Y. CHANG, BRIAN J. MCNAMARA, and
`JAMES B. ARPIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`McNAMARA, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`JUDGMENT
`TERMINATION OF THE PROCEEDING
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.73
`
`
`
`1 This order is to be filed in each case. The parties are not authorized to use
`this style heading in any subsequent papers.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2017-01225; IPR2017-01226
`Patent 8,760,454 B2; 9,582,846 B2
`
`
`The parties have requested that these proceedings be terminated pursuant to
`a settlement. On September 28, 2017, the Board authorized the parties to file a
`Joint Motion To Terminate and a Joint Request that the Settlement Agreement Be
`Treated As Business Confidential Information under 37 C.F.R. 42.74(c). Paper 7
`in IPR2017-01225; Paper 8 in IPR2017-01226. On September 28, 2017 the parties
`filed a Joint Motion Terminate each proceeding (Paper 8 in IPR2017-01225; Paper
`9 in IPR2017-01226) and a Joint Request To File Settlement Agreement As
`Business Confidential in each proceeding (Paper 9 in IPR2017-01225; Paper 10 in
`IPR2017-01226). See 35 U.S.C. § 317(a); 37 C.F.R. § 42.72. The parties also
`filed a copy of a written settlement agreement. Ex. 1012 in IPR2017-01225; Ex.
`1010 in IPR2017-01226.
`A decision by the Board to institute a trial has not yet been entered. The
`parties have not identified any other related matters. Under these circumstances,
`the Board determines that it is appropriate to enter judgment2 and terminate the
`proceedings without rendering a final written decision. 37 C.F.R. § 42.72.
`It is, therefore,
`ORDERED that the joint motions to terminate the proceedings are
`GRANTED and the proceedings are hereby terminated;
`FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ joint requests that the settlement
`agreements be treated as business confidential information which shall be kept
`separate from the file of the involved patents under the provisions of
`35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c), are GRANTED.
`
`
`
`
`2 A judgment means a final written decision by the Board, or a termination of a
`proceeding. 37 C.F.R. § 42.2.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2017-01225; IPR2017-01226
`Patent 8,760,454 B2; 9,582,846 B2
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Robert Pluta
`Amanda Streff
`Bryan Nese
`MAYER BROWN LLP
`rpluta@mayerbrown.com
`astreff@mayerbrown.com
`bnese@mayerbrown.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`William Meunier
`Michael Renaud
`Adam Rizk
`MINTZ, LEVIN, COHEN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C.
`wameunier@mintz.com
`mtrenaud@mintz.com
`arizk@mintz.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`