throbber
Trial@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
` IPR2017-01225 Paper No. 10
`IPR2017-01226 Paper No. 10
` Date Entered: September 29, 2017
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`ATI TECHNOLOGIES ULC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-01225
`Patent 8,760,454 B2
`Case IPR2017-01226
`Patent 9,582,846 B21
`____________
`
`
`
`
`Before JONI Y. CHANG, BRIAN J. MCNAMARA, and
`JAMES B. ARPIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`McNAMARA, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`JUDGMENT
`TERMINATION OF THE PROCEEDING
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.73
`
`
`
`1 This order is to be filed in each case. The parties are not authorized to use
`this style heading in any subsequent papers.
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2017-01225; IPR2017-01226
`Patent 8,760,454 B2; 9,582,846 B2
`
`
`The parties have requested that these proceedings be terminated pursuant to
`a settlement. On September 28, 2017, the Board authorized the parties to file a
`Joint Motion To Terminate and a Joint Request that the Settlement Agreement Be
`Treated As Business Confidential Information under 37 C.F.R. 42.74(c). Paper 7
`in IPR2017-01225; Paper 8 in IPR2017-01226. On September 28, 2017 the parties
`filed a Joint Motion Terminate each proceeding (Paper 8 in IPR2017-01225; Paper
`9 in IPR2017-01226) and a Joint Request To File Settlement Agreement As
`Business Confidential in each proceeding (Paper 9 in IPR2017-01225; Paper 10 in
`IPR2017-01226). See 35 U.S.C. § 317(a); 37 C.F.R. § 42.72. The parties also
`filed a copy of a written settlement agreement. Ex. 1012 in IPR2017-01225; Ex.
`1010 in IPR2017-01226.
`A decision by the Board to institute a trial has not yet been entered. The
`parties have not identified any other related matters. Under these circumstances,
`the Board determines that it is appropriate to enter judgment2 and terminate the
`proceedings without rendering a final written decision. 37 C.F.R. § 42.72.
`It is, therefore,
`ORDERED that the joint motions to terminate the proceedings are
`GRANTED and the proceedings are hereby terminated;
`FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ joint requests that the settlement
`agreements be treated as business confidential information which shall be kept
`separate from the file of the involved patents under the provisions of
`35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c), are GRANTED.
`
`
`
`
`2 A judgment means a final written decision by the Board, or a termination of a
`proceeding. 37 C.F.R. § 42.2.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case IPR2017-01225; IPR2017-01226
`Patent 8,760,454 B2; 9,582,846 B2
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Robert Pluta
`Amanda Streff
`Bryan Nese
`MAYER BROWN LLP
`rpluta@mayerbrown.com
`astreff@mayerbrown.com
`bnese@mayerbrown.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`William Meunier
`Michael Renaud
`Adam Rizk
`MINTZ, LEVIN, COHEN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C.
`wameunier@mintz.com
`mtrenaud@mintz.com
`arizk@mintz.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket