throbber
Haberle et al. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 2012, 7:32
`
`
`
`http:/ /www.ojrd.com/content/7 /1/32
`
`ORPHANET JOURNAL
`OF RARE DISEASES
`
`REVIEW
`
`Open Access
`
`Suggested guidelines for the diagnosis and
`
`
`
`
`management of urea cycle disorders
`3, Anupam ChakrapaniJohannes Haberle1·, Nathalie Boddaert2, Alberto Burlina
`
`
`
`
`4, Marjorie Dixon5, Martina Huemer6,
`
`Daniela Karall7, Diego Martinelli
`
`8, Pablo Sanjurjo Crespo9, Rene Santer10, Aude SeNais11, Vassili Valayannopou
`los12,
`
`
`Martin Lindner 13*t, Vicente Rubio 14*t and Carlo Dionisi Vid*t
`
`
`Abstract
`Urea cycle disorders (UCDs) are inborn errors of ammonia detoxification/arginine synthesis due to defects affecting the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`catalysts of the Krebs Henseleit cycle (five core enzymes, one activating enzyme and one mitochondrial omithine/
`
`
`
`
`
`
`citrulline antiporter) with an estimated incidence of 1:8.000. Patients present with hyperammonemia either shortly after
`
`
`birth (-50%) or, later at any age, leading to death or to severe neurological handicap in many suNivors. Despite the
`
`
`
`existence of effective therapy with alternative pathway therapy and liver transplantation, outcomes remain poor. This
`
`
`
`may be related to underrecognition and delayed diagnosis due to the nonspecific clinical presentation and insufficient
`
`
`awareness of health care professionals because of disease rarity. These guidelines aim at providing a trans European
`
`
`
`
`consensus to: guide practitioners, set standards of care and help awareness campaigns. To achieve these goals, the
`
`guidelines were developed using a Delphi methodology, by having professionals on UCDs across seven European
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`countries to gather all the existing evidence, score it according to the SIGN evidence level system and draw a series of
`
`
`
`statements supported by an associated level of evidence. The guidelines were revised by external specialist consultants,
`
`
`
`
`unrelated authorities in the field of UCDs and practicing pediatricians in training. Although the evidence degree did
`
`
`hardly ever exceed level C (evidence from non analytical studies like case reports and series), it was sufficient to guide
`
`
`
`
`
`practice on both acute and chronic presentations, address diagnosis, management, monitoring, outcomes, and
`
`
`
`psychosocial and ethical issues. Also, it identified knowledge voids that must be filled by future research. We believe
`
`
`
`these guidelines will help to: harmonise practice, set common standards and spread good practices with a positive
`
`impact on the outcomes of UCO patients.
`Urea cycle disorders, UCO, Hyperammonemia, N acetylglutamate synthase, Carbamoylphosphate synthetase
`
`
`
`
`
`Keywords:
`
`
`
`
`
`1, Ornithine transcarbamylase, Ornithine carbamoyl transferase, Argininosuccinate synthetase, Argininosuccinate lyase,
`Arginase 1, Hyperomithinemia hyperammonemia homocitru
`llinuria syndrome
`
`1 cycle enzymes (Figure 1), carbamoylphosphate synthetase
`
`
`
`Introduction
`
`
`(CPSl), ornithine transcarbamylase (OTC), argininosuccinate
`Urea cycle disorders (UCDs) are inborn errors of nitrogen
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`detoxification/arginine synthesis due to defects in the urea synthetase (ASS), argininosuccinate lyase (ASL) and arginase
`
`1 (ARGl), leading to respective deficiencies (abbreviated
`• Correspondence: Johannes.Haeberle@kispi.uzh.ch; martin.Ii nd ner@med.uni
`
`
`
`CPSlD, OTCD, ASSD, ASLD and ARGlD; correspondi
`
`heidel berg.de; rubiO@ibv.csic.es; carlo.d ioni sivici@Opbg.net
`ng
`
`#237300, #311250; #215700; #207900;
`MIM numbers,
`tEqual contributors
`
`
`
`#207800 respectively). They also encompass deficiencies of
`
`
`
`
`
`'University Children's Hospital Zurich and Children's Research Centre, Zurich
`8032, Switzerland
`
`
`
`N-acetylglutamate synthase (NAGS) (MIM #237310), asso­
`
`
`13University Children's Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 430, Heidelberg 69120,
`
`
`ciated with lack of the N-acetylglutamate (NAG) essential
`Germany
`
`••institute de Biomedicina de Valencia del Consejo Superior de
`
`activator of CPSl and of the mitochondrial ornithine/citrul­
`
`
`lnvestigaciones Cientfficas (IBV CSIO and Centro de lnvestigaci6n Biomedica
`
`
`line antiporter (ORNTl), causing the hyperornithinemia­
`
`
`en Red para Enfermedades Raras (OBERER), Cl Jaume Roig 11, Valencia
`
`
`hyperammonemia-homocitrullinuria (HHH) syndrome
`46010, Spain
`
`
`
`(MIM #238970). The p revalence of these disorders may
`8Division of Metabolism, Bambino Gesu Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza 5.
`Onofrio 4, Rome I 00165, Italy
`
`(1:8,000-1:44,000 (1-3],
`
`exceed the current estimates
`births
`
`
`Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
`
`Q 2012 Haberle et al; licensee BioMed Cen tral Ltd This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
`0 BioMed Central
`
`rg/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.o
`
`
`reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
`Page 1 of30
`
`Horizon Exhibit 2019
`
`Lupin v. Horizon
`IPR2017-01160
`
`

`

`Haberle et al. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 2012, 7:32
`htth/www.ojrd.com/content/7/1 I32
`
`Page20f30
`
`Portal blood
`
`
`
`Mitochondrion
`
`Glutamine
`
`
`
`NAD(P)H
`
`
`
`
`Cytosol
`NH3 + Hco3
`
`Aspartate 4— Oxalacetate
`
`+ 1ATP
`
`Citrulline
`
`Asgarta te czcle
`
`I
`
`Citrulline
`
`Argininosuccinate
`
`Malate
`
`
`
`
`
`
`’
`
`'
`

`
`Urea cycle
`
`Fumarate
`
`Arglnine
`
`+ HgO
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Acetyl CoA
`
`+2ATP
`
`mes
`N-Acety|- filo cps1
`L-glutamate
`_
`
`I:ii'
`
`Carbamoyl-
`phosphate
`1
`
`+ Ornithine
`
`ATP, NADPH
`
`“
`
`
`
`L-Glutamate-
`
`EEK]
`
`‘y-semialdehyde
`I
`f
`I
`chemical
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`A‘-Pyrroline—
`5-carboxylate
`
`* Ornithine
`,
`
`UMp _. Uridine, Uracil
`T
`0MP —* Orotidine
`T
`Proline
`— — — - - - ->-§ >- + -> Orotic acid
`
`Urea
`
`Figure 1 The urea cycle and associated pathways. Non standard abbreviations include: GDH, glutamate dehydrogenase; GL5, glutaminase;
`NAD(P), nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (phosphate); OAT, ornithine aminotransferase; 0MP, orotidine monophosphate‘; PSCR, pyrroline 5
`carboxylate reductase; PSCS, A1 pyrroline 5 carboxylate synthetase; UMP, uridine monophosphate.
`
`for all UCDs jointly) because of unreliable newborn
`screening and underdiagnosis of fatal cases. Clinical fea—
`tures are typical in complete deficiencies, which present
`with hyperammonemic coma a few days after birth with
`~50% mortality [4—7], whereas the survivors experience se—
`vere developmental delay and recurrent hyperammonemic
`crises [4—7]. Even in partial deficiencies, which have more
`variable clinical presentations and later onset (any age),
`there is increased risk of premature death [5,8]. The dur—
`ation and severity of hyperammonemia strongly correlates
`with brain damage [6,9,10]; prompt diagnosis and treat—
`ment of UCD is essential in order to optimise the out—
`come.
`[11]. However, the rarity of UCDs prevents single
`centres or even countries to have all the expertise for
`evidence—based management. Therefore, we have devel-
`oped consensus guidelines based on the highest available
`level of evidence, by pooling all the published evidence and
`experience of leading centres from several European coun—
`tries, to help standardise, systematise and harmonise across
`Europe the diagnosis, therapy, procedures and management
`
`of UCDs. These guidelines, developed with the Delphi
`methodology are intended to be used by metabolic specia—
`lists, pediatricians, dietitians, neonatologists, intensive care
`specialists, adult physicians, neurologists, nurses, psycholo—
`gists and pharmacists involved in the care of UCD patients.
`Excluded from these guidelines because of insufficient
`European experience, or of tangential relationship with
`UCDs are: citrin deficiency (citrullinemia type 2, MIM
`#605814 and #603471), lysinuric protein intolerance (LPI,
`MIM #222700), deficiencies of pyrroline Scarboxylate
`synthetase (MINI #610652) and ornithine aminotransferase
`deficiency (OAT, MIM #258870), despite the fact that they
`may cause hyperammonemia
`
`Methodology and objectives
`Guidelines development
`Development of
`these guidelines spanned the time
`period, October 2008 until August 2011 and involved
`one preliminary meeting and four working meetings of
`the guideline development group (GDG),
`formed by
`
`Page 2 of 30
`
`

`

`Häberle et al. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 2012, 7:32
`http://www.ojrd.com/content/7/1/32
`
`Page 3 of 30
`
`pediatric metabolic specialists (S. Baumgartner [Inns-
`bruck, retired after the first meeting], AB, AC, CDV, S.
`Grünewald, [London, retired after the first meeting], JH
`[chairman], DK, ML [secretary], DM, PS, VV), a medical
`biochemist (VR), a psychologist (MH), a specialist meta-
`bolic dietitian (MD), a metabolic specialist caring for
`adult patients (AS) and a neuroradiologist (NB). Each
`meeting was supervised by a moderator (P. Burgard, Hei-
`delberg [first meeting] and RS) who oversaw the discus-
`sion but did not contribute to the content. In the initial
`working meeting the GDG was trained on standardising
`literature evaluation and working groups focusing on
`specific topics were formed. Thereafter GDG members
`discussed and performed systematic literature review and
`drafted the guidelines. These drafts were
`further
`reviewed by external specialists on intensive care (L.
`Dupic, Paris), genetics (A. Gal, Hamburg), child neur-
`ology (A. Garcia-Cazorla, Barcelona), nephrology (S.
`Picca, Rome), liver transplantation (J. de Ville de Goyet,
`Rome), epidemiology (A. Tozzi, Rome) and ethics (C.
`Rehmann-Sutter, Basel) and a patient group representative
`(S. Hannigan, London). After further recommendations/
`comments by three highly renowned external reviewers (C.
`Bachmann, Bottmingen; J.V. Leonard, Oxford and H. Ogier,
`Paris), the final version of the guidelines was written and its
`applicability pilot-tested by non-specialist pediatricians in
`training, with subsequent review and revision by the GDG.
`The guidelines will be sent for endorsement to all European
`societies for inherited metabolic diseases.
`
`Systematic literature review and evidence grading
`The guidelines evidence base was collected according to
`the Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network (SIGN,
`http://www.sign.ac.uk). Systematic literature review en-
`compassing from each disease description until early 2011
`was carried out using mainly Medline, Embase,
`the
`Cochrane Library, MedLink, and Orphanet. Searches also
`included websites of societies and parents groups for in-
`born errors. Relevant papers were evaluated by at least
`two GDG members before considering conclusions as
`evidence.
`Evidence levels were classified in accordance with the
`SIGN methodology:
`
`"Evidence level & criteria"
`1++ High quality meta-analyses, systematic reviews of
`randomized control trials (RCTs), or RCTs with a very
`low risk of bias.
`1+ Well conducted meta-analyses, systematic reviews of
`RCTs, or RCTs with a low risk of bias.
`1- Meta-analyses, systematic reviews or RCTs, or RCTs
`with a high risk of bias.
`2++ High quality systematic reviews of case control or
`cohort studies or high quality case control or cohort
`
`studies with a very low risk of confounding bias, or
`chance and a high probability that the relationship is
`causal.
`2+ Well conducted case control or cohort studies with
`a low risk of confounding, bias, or chance and a
`moderate probability that the relationship is causal.
`2- Case control or cohort studies with a high risk of
`confounding, bias, or chance and a significant risk that
`the relationship is not causal.
`3 Non-analytic studies, e.g. case reports, case series.
`4 Expert opinion.
`
`Recommendations given in the guidelines are graded
`depending on their level of evidence:
`
`"Grade of recommendation & criteria"
`A If level 1 evidence was found (not the case).
`B If level 2 evidence was found.
`C If level 3 evidence was found (mainly non-analytical
`studies such as case reports and case series).
`D If level 4 evidence was found (mainly expert opinion).
`
`Disclaimer
`These guidelines aim at helping decision making in
`UCD patient care. Although based on the best avail-
`able evidence, the recommendations given often re-
`flect only expert opinion and are thus not meant to
`be rigidly implemented. Furthermore, although as ex-
`haustive as possible, these guidelines cannot include
`all possible methods of diagnostic work-up and care
`and may therefore fail
`to mention some acceptable
`and established procedures. Guidelines cannot guaran-
`tee satisfactory diagnosis and outcome in every pa-
`tient. Although helping optimise the care of individual
`patients and assist decision-making by basing clinical
`practice on the existing scientific and medical know-
`ledge, they should not substitute well-informed, pru-
`dent clinical practice.
`
`Diagnosis
`The clinical picture
`The clinical manifestations of UCDs (Table 1) can occur at
`any age [12-16], with hyperammonemic crises being fre-
`quently triggered by catabolic events, protein overload or
`certain drugs. Most symptoms are neurological but nonspe-
`cific. A UCD should be immediately suspected in neonates
`if there are any neurological symptoms or at any age if there
`is an acute encephalopathy. Hepatic-gastrointestinal and
`psychiatric nonspecific manifestations (Table 1) are second
`in frequency. Only the hair shaft abnormalities with hair
`fragility (trichorrhexis nodosa)
`found mainly in ASLD
`[12,17-19] and the progressive spastic diplegia beginning in
`childhood (or later) in ARG1D and the HHH syndrome,
`
`Page 3 of 30
`
`

`

`Häberle et al. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 2012, 7:32
`http://www.ojrd.com/content/7/1/32
`
`Page 4 of 30
`
`Table 1 Clinical signs and symptoms of acute and chronic presentations of UCDs, and triggering factors for
`hyperammonemia in UCD patients
`Acute presentation
`(cid:129) Altered level of consciousness (from somnolence and
`lethargy to coma) mimicking encephalitis or drug
`intoxication
`
`Chronic presentation
`(cid:129) Confusion, lethargy, dizziness
`
`(cid:129) Migraine like headaches, tremor, ataxia, dysarthria
`
`(cid:129) Acute encephalopathy (see below)
`
`(cid:129) Asterixis (in adults)
`
`(cid:129) Seizures (generally not isolated but along with an
`altered level of consciousness)
`
`(cid:129) Learning disabilities, neurodevelopmental delay, mental retardation
`
`(cid:129) Ataxia (generally associated with altered consciousness level)
`
`(cid:129) Chorea, cerebral palsy
`
`(cid:129) Stroke like episodes
`
`(cid:129) Transient visual loss
`
`(cid:129) Protracted cortical visual loss
`
`(cid:129) Progressive spastic diplegia or quadriplegia (described in ARG1D
`and HHH syndrome)
`
`(cid:129) Vomiting and progressive poor appetite
`
`(cid:129) Protein aversion, self selected low protein diet
`
`(cid:129) Liver failure
`
`(cid:129) Multiorgan failure
`
`(cid:129) Peripheral circulatory failure
`(cid:129) “Post partum psychosis”
`
`(cid:129) Psychiatric symptoms (hallucinations, paranoia,
`mania, emotional or personality changes)
`
`In neonates:
`
`(cid:129) sepsis like picture, temperature instability
`(cid:129) respiratory distress, hyperventilation
`
`(cid:129) Abdominal pain, vomiting
`
`(cid:129) Failure to thrive
`
`(cid:129) Hepatomegaly, elevated liver enzymes
`
`(cid:129) Psychiatric symptoms: hyperactivity, mood
`alteration, behavioural changes, aggressiveness
`
`(cid:129) Self injurious behaviour
`
`(cid:129) Autism like symptoms
`
`(cid:129) Fragile hair (typical for ASLD)
`
`(cid:129) Dermatitis
`
`(cid:129) Specific neuropsychological phenotype in heterozygous OTC females
`
`(cid:129) Episodic character of signs and symptoms
`
`Potential triggers of hyperammonemic crises in UCD patients
`(cid:129) Infections
`
`(cid:129) Fever
`
`(cid:129) Vomiting
`
`(cid:129) Gastrointestinal or internal bleeding
`
`(cid:129) Decreased energy or protein intake (e.g. fasting pre surgery, major weight loss in neonates)
`
`(cid:129) Catabolism and involution of the uterus during the postpartum period (mostly OTC females)
`
`(cid:129) Chemotherapy, high dose glucocorticoids
`
`(cid:129) Prolonged or intense physical exercise
`
`(cid:129) Surgery under general anesthesia
`
`(cid:129) Unusual protein load (e.g. a barbecue, parenteral nutrition)
`
`(cid:129) Drugs: Mainly valproate and L asparaginase/pegaspargase. Topiramate, carbamazepine, phenobarbitone, phenytoine, primidone,
`furosemide, hydrochlorothiazide and salicylates have also been associated with hyperammonemic decompensation.
`
`Typical and uncommon signs and symptoms are highlighted in bold and normal type, respectively, whereas italic type marks signs and symptoms reported in
`single patients. Grade of recommendation, D.
`
`frequently without hyperammonemic episodes [20-22], are
`specific manifestations of this group of diseases. Symptoms
`can be subtle, particularly after the neonatal period, and in
`some patients symptomatic episodes can resolve with non-
`specific interventions. Women can first manifest a UCD as
`acute unexplained neurological symptoms in the postpar-
`tum period (reported for CPS1D, OTCD, and ASSD [23-
`
`25]). Variability in disease severity is characteristic for
`OTCD heterozygous females (due to lyonization) [11,26],
`but is also found in all UCDs, being mainly attributable to
`differences in the severity of the genetic change [27-30].
`However, the same genetic defect can yield both mild and
`severe presentations even in different members of the same
`family (reported for OTCD and for one CPS1D family)
`
`Page 4 of 30
`
`

`

`Häberle et al. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 2012, 7:32
`http://www.ojrd.com/content/7/1/32
`
`Page 5 of 30
`
`[31-33]. Acute liver failure has been reported as the present-
`ing sign in patients with OTCD, ASSD and HHH syndrome
`[34-39]. Although rare, a number of other presentations
`have been reported in UCDs, including stroke-like episodes
`(metabolic strokes) [10,40-44] that may resolve with treat-
`ment, chorea [45], cerebral palsy without hyperammonemia
`or cerebral edema [46,47], episodic transient or protracted
`cortical visual losses [48,49], dermatitis (most probably be-
`cause of treatment-related malnutrition) [50,51], autism-like
`symptoms [52,53], behavioural problems during childhood
`[53] and in postpuberal patients and other episodic psychi-
`atric symptoms that may be the only manifestation [54].
`A careful medical and family history is mandatory
`and should include questions about unexplained neo-
`natal deaths, neurological or psychiatric disorders in
`the family, consanguinity (frequent in all UCDs except
`in OTCD, which is X-linked), evidence of protein
`avoidance in patient and family members and drug in-
`take by the patient.
`
`Statement #1. Grade of recommendation: C
`UCDs may present with acute or chronic presentations
`at any age and are often triggered by catabolic events,
`protein load or some drugs. In many cases a precipitat-
`ing factor cannot be identified. Clinical signs and symp-
`toms
`are nonspecific
`and commonly neurological,
`gastrointestinal or psychiatric. It is essential that health-
`care professionals have an awareness of these diseases.
`Key questions should be asked and a detailed family his-
`tory with pedigree is mandatory.
`
`Statement #2. Grade of recommendation: D
`UCDs must be included in the differential diagnosis of
`acute unexplained encephalopathy or acute psychiatric
`illness at any age, which must prompt plasma ammonia
`determination.
`
`Laboratory findings
`Hyperammonemia, a nonspecific marker of inadequate
`nitrogen detoxification [55],
`is the hallmark for most
`UCDs. The absence of hyperammonemia in symptomatic
`newborn patients (but not in older patients) renders a
`UCD highly unlikely. Rapid ammonia measurement in
`an emergency setting is crucial since patient outcome
`correlates with the duration and peak level of hyperam-
`monemia [4,6,56]. Respiratory alkalosis in a newborn
`should prompt immediate ammonia measurement be-
`cause it is present initially in 50% of acute UCDs [5].
`Otherwise the acid base status is of limited use [57].
`
`Statement #3. Grade of recommendation: C
`Ammonia should be determined in an emergency setting
`with results available in 30 minutes.
`
`Statement #4. Grade of recommendation: D
`Ammonia should be measured in patients of any age
`presenting 1) an unexplained change in consciousness;
`2) unusual or unexplained neurological illness; 3) liver
`failure; 4) suspected intoxication.
`
`If hyperammonemia is confirmed, determination of
`plasma amino acids, blood or plasma acylcarnitines,
`urinary organic acids and orotic acid should be ur-
`gently requested together with basic laboratory inves-
`tigations, not waiting for the results (which should be
`obtained in <24 h) for treating the patient. When tak-
`ing samples after recovery from an acute episode,
`plasma amino acid levels and/or urinary orotic acid
`(measured with a specific method e.g. high perform-
`ance liquid chromatography) can be particularly help-
`ful
`for diagnosis.
`In patients with fatal outcome,
`procurement of anticoagulated blood for DNA isola-
`tion and storage of
`frozen aliquots of all samples
`obtained of plasma, serum, urine and cerebrospinal
`fluid (CSF) is recommended [16,58].
`
`Statement #5. Grade of recommendation: D
`If ammonia is found elevated, further metabolic investi-
`gations should be immediately carried out without delay-
`ing specific treatment.
`
`Differential diagnosis
`The most common misdiagnosis of early onset UCD
`patients is neonatal sepsis. A number of conditions
`that increase ammonia production and/or secondarily
`decrease ammonia detoxification can cause hyperam-
`monemia and mimic a UCD [16,59-63]. Thus, neo-
`natal hyperammonemia can be due to UCDs, to other
`inborn errors that cause secondary hyperammonemia,
`to liver failure or to congenital
`infection. Premature
`infants can have transient hyperammonemia, a condi-
`tion which is characterised by a normal blood glutam-
`ine level [64] and which is possibly due to ductus
`venosus shunting of portal blood [65-67]. Late-onset
`hyperammonemia can be triggered by most conditions
`that can also cause neonatal hyperammonemia, by
`chronic liver
`failure, exogenous
`intoxications
`(e.g.
`amanita phalloides), drugs (e.g. valproic acid), porto-
`caval shunt and Reye syndrome, by conditions that
`vastly increase either direct ammonia production (e.g.
`asparaginase treatment, urease-positive bacteria over-
`growth or genito-urinary infection) or protein catabol-
`ism (e.g. myeloma, chemotherapy,
`steroid therapy,
`trauma, gastrointestinal hemorrhage) and when there
`is excessive nitrogen supply (reported in total paren-
`teral nutrition or after glycine-solution irrigations in
`transurethral prostate resection) [5,17,68-72]. Table 2
`
`Page 5 of 30
`
`

`

`Häberle et al. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 2012, 7:32
`http://www.ojrd.com/content/7/1/32
`
`Table 2 Bedside differential diagnosis of inborn errors of metabolism presenting with hyperammonemia
`Parameter
`Condition
`β Oxidation
`defects
`
`UCDs
`
`Organic
`acidurias
`
`Hyperinsulinism
`hyperammonemia
`syndrome
`
`Page 6 of 30
`
`Pyruvate
`carboxylase
`deficiency g
`+
`
`++
`
`+
`
`+
`
`+/
`
`+
`
`+/
`
`(+)d
`
`Acidosis
`Ketonuriaa
`Hypoglycemiab
`" Lactic acidc
`" AST & ALT
`" CPK
`" Uric acid
`# WBC/RBC/Plt
`Weight loss
`
`+ e
`+
`
`+/
`
`+
`
`+
`
`+
`+f
`
`+/
`
`+
`
`+/
`
`+
`
`+
`
`+
`
`+
`
`In addition to the conditions indicated in the table, mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation defects, citrin deficiency, lysinuric protein intolerance or ornithine
`aminotransferase deficiency can also cause hyperammonemia.
`Grade of recommendation, D.
`a In neonates ketonuria (++ or +++) suggests organic aciduria.
`b Hypoglycemia and hyperammonemia (“pseudo Reye”) can be predominant manifestations of the organic aciduria due to 3 hydroxy 3 methylglutaryl CoA lyase deficiency.
`c Blood lactate >6mmol/L, since lower high lactate levels (2 6mM) may be due to violent crying or to extensive muscle activity.
`d AST & ALT elevations can be found but are not constant in UCDs.
`e Can be absent in neonates.
`f Occurrence only in neonates.
`g Only type B is associated with hyperammonemia but not types A and C.
`
`lists errors of metabolism leading to hyperammone-
`mia, guiding bedside differentiation.
`
`Statement #6. Grade of recommendation: C
`In newborns with clinical distress where sepsis is sus-
`pected, hyperammonemia must always form part of the
`initial differential diagnosis.
`
`Standard clinical and analytical procedures generally
`differentiate between hyperammonemia due to inborn
`errors and that due to other conditions such as liver fail-
`ure [1,16,73-75]. The algorithm given in Figure 2 guides
`the identification of the specific defect when the hyper-
`ammonemia is due to an inborn error. ARG1D and
`ASLD can be identified, respectively, by the high plasma
`arginine or the high plasma/urinary argininosuccinate
`(ASA) level. The finding of high plasma citrulline in the
`absence of ASA is highly suggestive of ASSD. The com-
`bination of hyperammonemia with low plasma citrulline
`and arginine is diagnostic of OTCD when orotic acid is
`increased in the urine, whereas it strongly suggests
`CPS1D or NAGS deficiency (NAGSD) when urinary oro-
`tic acid is low. The finding of high plasma ornithine and
`hyperammonemia, (these two traits can also be found in
`OAT deficiency) with high urinary homocitrulline is
`characteristic of the HHH syndrome. When the metabol-
`ite pattern is not clear-cut, activity assays of urea cycle
`enzymes in liver (all urea cycle enzymes), red blood cells
`(ASL and ARG1; still very useful
`in ARG1D [76]),
`
`intestinal mucosa (CPS1, OTC) or fibroblasts (ASS, ASL,
`HHH) can clarify diagnosis, although enzyme assays have
`generally been replaced by genetic testing. Enzyme ana-
`lysis is now mainly reserved for the minority of cases in
`whom genetic analysis fails to identify a specific UCD
`(see below).
`
`Statement #7. Grade of recommendation: D
`Genetic testing is the method of first choice to confirm
`the diagnosis. Liver tissue,
`intestinal mucosa, erythro-
`cytes and fibroblasts can be used for enzyme activity
`assays in UCDs if genetic testing does not identify a spe-
`cific UCD, or if it is not available. In deceased patients
`with a suspicion of UCD, fibroblasts and/or liver tissue
`should be preserved frozen.
`
`Molecular genetic analysis
`Except
`for OTCD, which is transmitted in the X-
`chromosome, UCDs exhibit autosomal recessive inherit-
`ance [12-16]. Mutations in the corresponding genes
`(homonymous with the enzymes) have been identified in
`patients of all UCDs (see http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
`sites/entrez?db=omim)
`including citrullinemia type 2
`(SLC25A15 gene encoding citrin) and the HHH syn-
`drome (SLC25A13 gene). Mutation detection has at least
`~80% sensitivity [77] and permits carrier identification,
`prenatal diagnosis, facilitating pedigree analysis, genetic
`counselling and in some cases genotype-phenotype
`
`Page 6 of 30
`
`

`

`Haberle et aI. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 2012, 732
`http://www.ojrd.com/content/7/1 I32
`
`Page 7 of 30
`
`Glutamlne
`elevated
`
`Cltrulllne
`
`Cltrqlllne
`
`cttqqlllne
`
`CHEEHIMl
`
`cttrulllne
`TT
`
`U OI'OIIC 86k]
`normal
`
`U Orotlc acld
`elevated
`
`v Arg. Lys, 0m
`T U Arg, Lys, 0
`T u Orotic acid
`LPI
`
`T ASA
`T U Orotic acid
`ASL D
`
`THAN
`
`normal AA AcylcamltlnesT
`
`Organic acld TT
`
`
`
`Organlc acldurlas
`MMA - PA
`Acidosis
`
`FAO detects
`WAD — VLCAD - TPD
`
`Hypogyoemia
`
`ypoglycemla
`HI-HA
`HMG
`
`c" 2
`T Met, Tyr
`A-FP.
`- alactose
`
`PC dellclency
`Lactic acidosis
`
`NAGS D
`CPS D
`
`Omlthlne
`elevated
`
`Ornlthlne
`normal
`
`T U Omtic acid
`ASS D
`
`JyArg
`TAla
`OTC D '
`
`T T Arg
`ARG1 D
`
`Om can be
`transiently normal
`OAT D
`
`HHH S
`T Homocit
`
`OAT D
`
`Figure 2 Diagnostic algorithm for neonatal hyperammonemia. Unless indicated, plasma is used for the analytical determinations Non
`standard abbreviations include A FP, a fetoprotein; CIT 2, citrullinemia type 2; CPSD, CPS] deficiency; HI HA, hyperinsulinism hyperammonemia
`syndrome; HMG, 3 hydroxy 3 methylglutaryl Co/\ Iyase deficiency; LPI, lysinuric protein intolerance; OATD, ornithine aminotransferase deficiency,
`PA, propionic acidemia; PC, pyruvate carboxylase; PSCSD, AI pyrroline S carboxylate deficiency; THAN, transient hyperammonemia of the newborn;
`1P0, trifunctional protein deficiency; U, urine. Grade of recommendation, D. * In some patients with late onset OTCD, plasma citrulline levels are in
`the lower part of the normal range.
`
`correlations [15,27,78], conceivably opening the way to
`future
`therapies
`(e.g.
`nonsense
`read—through
`approaches). DNA, generally from blood,
`is used,
`al—
`though the large number of CPS] exons renders prefer—
`able the utilization of RNA from cultured fibroblasts for
`
`CPSlD studies. For other UCDs RNA analysis (from liver
`in the case of OTCD) is only carried out when DNA ana—
`lysis is negative [79-81]. Prognostic judgements on the
`disease—causing nature of missense mutations (the most
`frequent ones) and of some splice—site mutations are diffi—
`cult if not backed by in vitro expression studies of the mu—
`tant protein.
`
`Statement #8. Grade of recommendation: C
`
`Mutation analysis is the method of choice for definitive
`diagnosis of UCDs, to help with genetic counselling and
`in some instances indicate the prognosis.
`
`Statement #9. Grade of recommendation: D
`
`Mutation analysis has some pitfalls and limitations, includ—
`ing the difficulty in establishing the pathogenic potential of
`a missense mutation. In vib‘o protein expression studies
`and in silico analyses based on sequence conservation and
`protein structure can help infer pathogenic potential but
`are not part of routine clinical management.
`
`Prenatal testing
`Prenatal investigations in UCDs are available in many coun—
`tries and may enable pregnancy termination of affected foe—
`tuses. These may also be indicated in milder UCDs or for
`NAGSD (which has substitutive therapy) for psychological
`reasons and to prepare for perinatal management [82—84].
`Among the techniques
`that can be used (Table 3),
`mutation- or disease allele-tracking using chorionic villus
`samples, amniotic fluid cells or cultures thereof [85,86] is
`
`Page 7 0f 30
`
`

`

`Häberle et al. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 2012, 7:32
`http://www.ojrd.com/content/7/1/32
`
`Page 8 of 30
`
`CPS1D
`
`Table 3 Prenatal testing of UCDs: Recommended analyses
`and sample requirements
`Disorder
`Recommended tests
`Mutation analysis using DNA from CVS or AFCa
`NAGSD
`Mutation analysis using DNA from CVS or AFC
`Enzyme assay in late fetal liver biopsyb
`Mutation analysis using DNA from CVS or AFCc
`Enzyme assay in late fetal liver biopsyb,d
`Mutation analysis using DNA from CVS or AFC
`
`OTCD
`
`ASSD
`
`Citrulline in amniotic fluid
`
`Enzyme assay in intact or cultured CVS or
`in cultured AFC
`
`ASLD
`
`Mutation analysis using DNA from CVS or AFC
`
`Argininosuccinate and its anhydrides in
`amniotic fluid
`
`Enzyme assay in intact or cultured CVS or cultured AFC
`
`ARG1D
`
`Mutation analysis using DNA from CVS
`
`Enzyme assay in fetal blood erythrocytes
`(mid gestation sampling)
`
`HHH syndrome Mutation analysis using DNA from CVS or AFC
`
`Enzyme assay in CVS or cultured AFC
`
`First choices are given in bold type. CVS, chorionic villus sampling. AFC,
`amniotic fluid cells. Grade of recommendation, D.
`a The woman should be informed prior to prenatal testing that in NAGSD the
`phenotype can be normalized completely with life long substitutive therapy.
`b Very limited experience (single patient report) and test not widely available.
`c The presence of one mutation in a female fetus cannot predict the
`phenotype given the effect of lyonization.
`d Informative in males but interpretation not clear in females due to
`lyonization caused X mosaicism.
`
`the method of choice since it gives rapid and clear-cut
`results relatively early on, with little fetal risk. Amniotic fluid
`citrulline and ASA determinations are also suitable for re-
`spective ASSD and ASLD prenatal diagnosis [86-88].
`
`Statement #10. Grade of recommendation: D
`Prenatal testing requires joint careful counselling by clin-
`ical geneticists and metabolic specialists.
`
`Statement #11. Grade of recommendation: C-D
`Molecular genetic analysis is the preferred prenatal test-
`ing method for all UCDs. Investigations of metabolites in
`amniotic fluid and of enzyme activities in chorionic villi,
`cultured amniotic cells, fetal liver or fetal erythrocytes
`can also be used.
`
`Newborn screening (NBS)
`UCD patients manifesting severe neonatal hyperammo-
`nemia benefit little from NBS or even from early diagno-
`sis, because of their poor prognosis [89-91] although the
`family would benefit from knowing the diagnosis. How-
`ever, NAGSD, CPS1D and OTCD are generally not
`
`screened for, given the instability of glutamine and the
`low specificity and sensitivity for detection of decreases
`in the citrulline level [92]. The benefits of screening for
`ASSD, ASLD, and ARG1D, carried out in most US
`states, Taiwan and Australia by assessing respectively
`citrulline, ASA and arginine levels in dried blood spots,
`have not yet been formally evaluated. Although for se-
`vere ASSD and ASLD there are few false positives and
`no false negatives [93-95], ASLD screening was aban-
`doned in Austria because of the high rate of positive
`newborns probably having partial deficiency but

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket