throbber

`
`Downloaded from on April 21, 2012 - Published by ep.bmj.com
`
`
`
`
`
` group.bmj.com
`
`INTERPRETATIONS
`
`Metabolic Medicine Unit, Great
`Ormond Street Hospital for
`Children with UCL Institute of
`Child Health, London, UK
`
`Correspondence to
`Dr Alexander Broomfi eld,
`Metabolic Medicine Unit, Great
`Ormond Street Hospital for
`Children with UCL Institute of
`Child Health, 34 Great Ormond
`Street, London WC1N 3JH, UK;
`Brooma@gosh.nhs.uk
`
`Received 14 April 2011
`Accepted 24 October 2011
`Published Online First
`18 November 2011
`
`How to use serum ammonia
`
`Alexander Broomfi eld, Stephanie Grunewald
`
`Abstract
`Hyperammonaemia is a potentially extremely
`important indicator of impairment in intermediate
`metabolism. However, lack of experience in
`sample handling and confusion about what
`level is signifi cant, can lead to its devaluation
`as a test. The aim of this article is to help the
`non-metabolic specialist to decide when it is
`appropriate to investigate for hyperammonaemia,
`to discuss potential investigatory pitfalls
`and to help in interpretation of results.
`
`Introduction
`When considering any key diagnostic
`metabolite in the investigation of suspected
`metabolic conditions, early and correct
`sampling are the main determinants of a
`successful diagnosis and can very often
`affect the outcome. Adequate perform-
`ance of any investigation is essential for
`both reliable and interpretable results.
`There are few better examples than that of
`plasma ammonia, an investigation that has
`been noted to be poorly performed even
`in specialised centres.1 2
`The aim of this study is to help the non-
`metabolic specialist to decide when it is
`appropriate to investigate for hyperam-
`monaemia (something unfortunately often
`investigated only after substantial delay),
`to discuss potential pitfalls and to help to
`interpret results. In addition, the authors
`provide some information on the inter-
`pretation of basic biochemical tests in the
`context of hyperammonaemia (table 1).
`However, as has been stated in previous
`studies in this series, there is no substitu-
`tion for close communication between the
`laboratory doing an investigation and the
`clinical team which is requesting it.
`
`Biochemical/physiological background
`Ammonia, a highly toxic intermediary
`metabolite, is formed during the catabolism
`of the nitrogen-containing amine groups of
`amino acids, as a normal part of biochemi-
`cal homoeostasis. At physiological pH,
`ammonia is mainly found as ammonium
`+), a small molecule (of molecular
`(NH4
`weight 18D), which can diffuse freely across
`
`the blood–brain barrier. To prevent ammo-
`nia accumulating, it is immediately incor-
`porated into glutamine and reconverted
`to ammonia in the liver.3 Here it is rapidly
`converted into urea by a series of reactions
`known as the urea cycle (figure 1). It is typ-
`ically a breakdown in the flux through this
`pathway that leads to hyperammonaemia,
`though general liver failure and the actions
`of urease-positive intestinal bacteria can
`also produce significant hyperammonae-
`mia.4 5The importance of normal ammonia
`homoeostasis can be from the deleterious
`pathological cascade that results when
`ammonia accumulates, with the central
`nervous system, being especially affected.
`Here, increased levels of ammonia result
`in both acute and chronic effects, such as
`osmotic effects due to glutamine accumula-
`tion, alterations in cerebral energy use and
`neurotransmission, impairment of axonal
`and dendritic growth and induction of neu-
`ronal apoptosis.3 6
`Inborn errors of metabolism (IEMs)
`that cause hyperammonaemia (table 2),
`without obvious liver failure, can be due
`to primary enzyme deficiencies of the urea
`cycle enzymes, due to defects in its sub-
`strate carriers, or because of secondary
`disruption of the urea cycle. Examples of
`secondary disruption are by the organic
`acidaemias such as propionic acidae-
`mia or methylmalonic acidaemia, where
`accumulating
`propionyl-coenzyme A
`competitively inhibits the production of
`N-acetylglutamate (the cofactor of car-
`bamylphosphate synthetase, CPS7, though
`there may be other contributing factors).8
`The mechanism behind the fatty acid oxi-
`dation defects leading to hyperammonae-
`mia is less clear but a possibility is that
`it is due to a generalised mitochondrial
`dysfunction resulting from a compensa-
`tory increase in ω-oxidation secondary to
`carnitine deficiency9 or due to deficiencies
`in acetyl CoA.10 Examples of transporter
`defects affecting the flux of urea cycle sub-
`strates into the cell cytoplasm or the mito-
`chondria are lysinuric protein intolerance
`and citrin deficiency, respectively.
`
`72
`
`Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed 2012;97:72–77. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2011-300194
`
`Page 1 of 7
`
`Horizon Exhibit 2015
`Lupin v. Horizon
`IPR2017-01160
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`ep.bmj.com
`
`
`
`group.bmj.com on April 21, 2012 - Published by
`
`
`
`INTERPRETATIONS
`
`Table 1 Routine biochemical investigations and their meaning in the
`context of hyperammonaemia
`
`Investigation
`
`Meaning if hyperammonaemia present
`
`Blood gas
`
`Anion gap
`
`Glucose
`
`Lactate
`
`Hypo/hypercalcaemia
`
`Liver function test including
`clotting
`
`Urinary ketones
`
`
`
`A respiratory alkalosis is suggestive of a urea cycle disorder and
`results from initial over stimulation of central respiratory drive by
`ammonia which may be subtle.
`A metabolic acidosis should prompt the calculation of an anion gap
`but in the context of hyperammonaemia it is suggestive of severe
` cardiovascular compromise and/or an organic acidaemia.
`−+Cl−)=8–11. An increased anion gap is strongly
`(Na+)-(HCO3
` suggestive of an organic acidaemia
`While hypoglycaemia is a non-specifi c marker of disease it does
`raise the possibility of a fatty acid oxidation disorder and should
`prompt testing of both creatine kinase and urinary ketones.
`The later being absent/ unexpectedly low in fatty acid oxidation
`disorders and in the HIHA.
`Typically a manifestation of poor peripheral perfusion or sampling
`from a squeezed capillary sample, but raises the possibility of
`organic acidaemias due to secondary TCA cycle inhibition or a
`mitochondrial cytopathy
`A disturbance in calcium regulation is often found in organic
`acidaemias. This should also prompt an evaluation for pancreatitis,
`that is consider amylase and lipase, especially in older patients as
`this is a well-known complication of organic acidaemias.
`If abnormal, suspect a fatty acid oxidation disorder and a creatine
`kinase should be taken. However liver failure is a feature of many
` disorders resulting in liver dysfunction.
`The presence of ketones in the urine of a neonate is suggestive of
`an organic academia.14
`Their absence can suggest a fatty acid oxidation disorder or HIHA.
`
`HIHA, Hyperinsulinism hyperammonaemia syndrome; TCA, tricarboxylic acid.
`
`Technological background: how is ammonia
`measured?
`The majority of laboratories in the UK use a method
`based on the reductive amination of 2-oxoglutarate
`by glutamate dehydrogenase (GLDH). This reaction,
`as can be seen below, requires reduced nicotinamide
`adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) with the
`reduction in NAPDH being proportional to the plasma
`ammonia concentration:
`2-Oxoglutarate+NH3+NADPH
`↑↓GLDH
`Glutamate+NADP
`The importance of the NADPH is that the change in
`its concentration can be measured spectroscopically, as
`the decrease of absorbance at 340 nm (the wavelength
`of NADPH) reflects its oxidisation to NADP.11
`In smaller laboratories where the demand is limited,
`reflectance meters are often used, employing dry slide
`chemistry strips for whole blood ammonia. In this
`method the intensity of colour formed by the reaction
`between blood ammonia and bromocresol green or
`similar indicator reagent is measured. The advantages
`of this technique are that it is quick, cheap and accu-
`rate.12 However, it does have one very important dis-
`advantage, which is a cut-off range of 286 µmol/l.
`It is of the upmost importance that clinicians are
`aware of the techniques used in their laboratories,
`
`though the laboratory should also be feeding back that
`there is a possibility of the ammonia being substan-
`tially higher, if they are using reflectance meters.
`
`Indications and limitations
`In whom should hyperammonaemia be suspected?
`Plasma ammonia can be used both as part of diag-
`nostic investigations and for monitoring of efficacy of
`treatment. Diagnostically, while the key characteristic of
`hyperammonaemia is an unexplained acute or progres-
`sive encephalopathy,13 its clinical presentation is also
`determined by the age at presentation and the degree of
`hyperammonaemia. Whereas the neonatal presentation
`is very non-specific, with neonates usually rapidly dete-
`riorating, mimicking sepsis, the range of presentation in
`older children is more varied encompassing gastrointesti-
`nal symptoms, liver disease and psychiatric disturbances
`as well as classical encephalopathy. In both infants and
`older children the British Inherited Metabolic Disease
`Group (BIMDG) decreased consciousness level and the
`MetBionet investigation of developmental delay guide-
`lines are useful resources in help guiding non-specialists
`to appropriate investigations.
`
`Newborns
`In the neonatal period, given the limited clinical reper-
`toire of response in the newborn, the initial symptoms
`
`Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed 2012;97:72–77. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2011-300194
`
`73
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 7
`
`

`

`INTERPRETATIONS
`
`Downloaded from
`
`ep.bmj.com
`
`
`
`group.bmj.com on April 21, 2012 - Published by
`
`
`
`Table 2 Causes of hyperammonaemia
`
`Artefact
`
`Haemolysis/specimen contamination/ delayed
`separation
`
`IEM resulting in direct
` inhibition of the urea cycle
`
`Urea cycle disorders
`
`Organic acidaemias
`
`Fatty acid oxidation
`disorders
`Other mainly
`
`Hepatic dysfunction
`
`Prehepatic
`
`
`
`hepatic
`Post hepatic
`
`Primary enzyme defects:
`N-acetylglutamate synthetase defi ciency;
`carbomylphosphate synthase defi ciency;
`ornithine transcarbamylase defi ciency;
`argininosuccinate synthase defi ciency;
`argininosuccinate lyase defi ciency;
` arginase defi ciency.
`Transporter defects:
`citrin defi ciency; hyperornithinaemia
`hyperammmonaemia homocitrullinuria
`(HHH); lysinuric protein intolerance.
`Propionic acidaemia; methylmalonic
` acidaemia; isovaleric acidaemia.
`Especially CPT1/LCHAD/VLCAD/glutaric
`aciduria type II.
`Ornithine aminotransferase defi ciency
`(OAT); hyperinsulinism hyperammonaemia.
`Abernathey malformation; Budd–Chiari
`syndrome.
`Any cause of hepatic failure.
`Biliary atresia.
`
`CPT1, carnitine palmitoyltransferase-1 (CPT-1) defi ciency; IEM, inborn errors of metabolism;
`LCHAD, long chain 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehdrogenase defi ciency; VLCAD, very long chain
`acyl-CoA dehydrogenase defi ciency.
`
`often mimic sepsis with lethargy, irritability, tempera-
`ture instability and feeding difficulties. As the ammonia
`level increases, respiratory distress, vomiting, altera-
`tion in tone, convulsions and apnoeas become more
`prominent.13 The rate of this decline is dependent on
`the nature of the underlying defect and its severity:
`the early manifesting urea cycle disorders (UCDs) and
`organic acidaemias often present between 12 and 72 h
`of age after an initial symptom-free period.14 However,
`hyperammonaemia can present at any age and the
`length of the classical symptom-free period may be
`absent or so short that it is not obvious. It is also to be
`noted that a respiratory alkalosis should always raise
`suspicion for hyperammonaemia though again it may
`be subtle. However, very often, the hyperammonae-
`mic sick neonate presents with an apparent metabolic
`acidosis, secondary to a concurrent impairment in car-
`diovascular stability.
`It seems sensible to target any neonate with pro-
`found encephalopathy or a pattern of presentation
`that does not fit with the presumed diagnosis: for
`example, patients with suspected hypoxic–ischaemic
`encephalopathy with normal Apgar scores or those
`with suspected sepsis but normal inflammatory mark-
`ers and negative cultures.15 Although hyperammo-
`naemia is a relatively rare cause of neonatal illness,
`it should not be missed, given that it is reversible and
`can have detrimental effects on the long-term progno-
`sis of affected individuals. Therefore, the authors feel
`that ammonia should be investigated in any neonate
`with unexplained non-specific systemic illness with
`
`neurological impairment. This is while fully accept-
`ing that occasionally the ammonia will have to be
`repeated to differentiate between false positives and
`those truly affected.
`
`Infants and older children
`In infants and older children the symptoms can be
`less acute, with some children showing a pattern of
`chronic failure to thrive, anorexia, lethargy and/or
`poor global development. Presentation can also be
`episodic, with neurological manifestations varying
`from mild behavioural disturbances and headaches to
`more severe symptoms such as ataxia, hemiplegia and
`convulsions16: One common clue often elicited in the
`history, is a self-restricted diet with the avoidance of
`high protein foods such as meat, cheese and fish.17 The
`severity of the symptoms is a reflection of the underly-
`ing disorder and the degree of catabolic stress: a good
`example is a previously well woman presenting post-
`partum with encephalopathy, a well recognised pres-
`entation of an ornithine trancarbamylase carrier where
`the protein load secondary to uterine involution may
`result in hyperammonaemia.18
`Because of the broad variation of clinical presenta-
`tions, decision towards testing for hyperammonaemia
`needs to be decided by the individual case. However in
`the authors’ opinion, plasma ammonia testing should
`be considered in any patient with recurrent neuro-
`logical symptomatology or a degree of neurological
`impairment, out of keeping with their clinical history
`or in the absence of other explanations.
`
`74
`
`Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed 2012;97:72–77. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2011-300194
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 3 of 7
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`ep.bmj.com
`
`
`
`group.bmj.com on April 21, 2012 - Published by
`
`
`
`Box 1 Factors infl uencing serum ammonia levels
`
`▶
`
`▶
`
`▶
`
`▶
`
` Primary diagnosis, its severity and nature of the underlying
`defect. A patient with arginase defi ciency will tend to manifest
`a lower level of hyperammonaemia than a patient with citrulli-
`naemia. However, even within a particular disorder, the extent
`of hyperammonaemia is variable. This variability normally
`refl ects the severity of underlying enzymatic impairment, with
`the disorders that present in the neonatal period tending to be
`more severe than those that present later in life.
` Amount of protein and energy the patient has been receiving
`in the diet prior to presentation. Inadequate dietary energy or
`protein provision has the potential to push the patient into a
`catabolic state. Inadequate provision of essential amino acids
`and energy drives deamination of the patients’ muscle pro-
`tein and increases fl ux through the urea cycle. The converse
`is also unfortunately true where excessive protein load, for
`example, a high protein intake can result in excessive strain
`on the compromised pathway. Thus, one of the key principles
`of long-term treatment is the provision of a safe dietary pro-
`tein minimum to meet the individual’s needs but minimising
`the fl ux through the urea cycle. Protein intake should be dis-
`continued, when patients are acutely unwell and adequate
`calorie intake should be provided by carbohydrates. Total
`protein exclusion beyond 48 h will, however, result in catabo-
`lism and thus increase fl ux through the urea cycle.
` Patient’s medication may also have a profound effect on the
`level of ammonia; for example, sodium valporate seems to
`act by reducing the amount of N-acetylglutamate, causing a
`secondary inhibition of carbamylphosphate synthetase, and
`therefore should be avoided.
` Level of muscle activity. This is the basis of exercise provoca-
`tion testing where high-intensity exercise results in ammonia
`production from the purine nucleotide breakdown, while in pro-
`longed submaximal exercise, ammonia production comes from
`the breakdown of branched chain amino acids. However. given
`that provocation testing traditionally requires 2 min of vigorous
`ischaemic exercise, this is not routinely of practical signifi cant.
`
`Patients with known IEM and risk of hyperammonaemia
`In any patient with an urea cycle defect, repeated
`ammonia levels are one of the key determinants of the
`efficacy of long-term treatment of the low-protein diet
`and ammonia scavenger drugs, sodium benzoate and
`sodium phenylbuturate.
`Additionally, ammonia levels should be among the
`initial investigations in any circumstances of suspected
`metabolic decompensation in any patient with an
`increased risk of hyperammonaemia (table 2). Children
`might have already become symptomatic, before an
`appreciable change in plasma ammonia is detectable.
`In these situations, careful observation and discussion
`of patients with the local metabolic team is warranted
`even in the face of normal ammonia levels.
`The importance of the evaluation of potential hyper-
`ammonaemia cannot be overstated in these patients, as
`hyperammonaemia is a treatable medical emergency.
`The basic concepts of therapy are based on the imme-
`diate elimination of protein (reducing flux of toxic
`
`INTERPRETATIONS
`
`metabolites), provision of high carbohydrates to stop
`catabolism/promote anabolism and the use of ammo-
`nia scavenger drugs.
`
`What is a signifi cant level of hyperammonaemia
`and when is it diagnostically relevant?
`The normal values for ammonia probably do not vary
`greatly with age of patient. Factors influencing serum
`ammonia levels are outlined in box 1.In term neonates
`typical plasma values are less that 65 µmol/l.19 However,
`any sick neonate, even those without a primary meta-
`bolic disorder may have much higher values.20 Given
`ammonia’s capacity to rise with generalised illness,
`particularly in the neonatal period and the difficulties
`of sampling, ammonia values of >150 µmol/l in sick
`premature neonates, >100 µmol/l in term neonates
`and >40 µmol/l in older infants and children should
`be considered as potentially worth investigating.21 22
`The current advice from The BIMDG is that ammo-
`nia measurement must be repeated immediately in
`children with levels >150 µmol/l and in neonates with
`levels >200 µmol/l.23
`Although historically it has been felt that the degree of
`hyperammonaemia and its rapidity of increase might be a
`guide towards underlying diagnosis, practically the value
`of the ammonia is not often diagnostically useful. While
`values of greater than 200 µmol/L are usually consid-
`ered to be suggestive of a potential metabolic disorder,2
`very high levels might primarily raise the suspicion for a
`UCD. However, overwhelming hyperammonaemia can
`also be seen in organic acidaemias especially in propi-
`onic aciduria,24 and even sepsis can result in ammonia
`levels of >700 µmol/l.25 High ammonia levels are much
`less commonly seen in fatty acid oxidation disorder.
`However, similar lower levels of ammonia are seen early
`into decompensation in patients’ diagnosed with UCDs
`and organic acidaemias.
`One important situation where the level of ammo-
`nia may be helpful is with the diagnosis is of transient
`hyperammonaemia of the newborn (THAN), a condi-
`tion caused by failure of closure of the ductus venous
`and lack of filtration of the ammonia from the blood:
`here, the levels of ammonia are extremely high within
`the first 24 h of life (often >1500 µmol/l). These levels
`when coupled with the history of a sick premature,
`often slightly growth-restricted neonate, are strongly
`suggestive of the diagnosis.26 Given the relatively high
`survival and good neurological outcomes of THAN
`with aggressive treatment, this is an important differ-
`ential to consider; however it is still crucial to perform
`a full differential investigation.
`
`Does the degree of hyperammonaemia give a
`guide to prognosis?
`Both survival rates and neurological outcome are
`affected by the duration and the degree of hyperam-
`monaemia. Enns et al, investigating neonatal hyper-
`ammonaemia secondary to UCD, found that survival
`was related to peak ammonia level. This study showed
`
`Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed 2012;97:72–77. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2011-300194
`
`75
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 4 of 7
`
`

`

`INTERPRETATIONS
`
`Downloaded from
`
`ep.bmj.com
`
`
`
`group.bmj.com on April 21, 2012 - Published by
`
`
`
`Figure 1 The urea cycle and primary urea cycle defects. Enzymes: 1, ornithine transcarbamylase; 2, argininosuccinate synthetase;
`3, argininosuccinate lyase; 4, arginase; 5, N-acetylglutamate synthetase and 6, carbamyl phosphate synthetase. Transporters: 7,
`citrin (mitochondrial aspartate-glutamate carrier) and 8, mitochondrial ornithine transporter cause of HHH, hyperammonaemia–
`hyperornithaemia–homocitrullinuria.
`
`that those patients whose maximal ammonia level was
`<500 µmol/l had a 94% survival rate but this fell to
`only 38% in those with ammonia levels >1000 µmol/
`l.27 Bachmann, in a study looking at neurological
`outcome in 88 patients with UCDs, reported that no
`patient whose peak ammonia had been >480 µmol/l
`had a normal neurological outcome. However, it is
`to be noted that for the most part this study predated
`the regular use of ammonia scavenger drugs and
`modern intensive care unit practices.28 Other studies
`have indicated that the duration of the encephalo-
`pathic coma is a better predictor of overall neurologi-
`cal outcome with increasingly poor results are seen
`with comas lasting greater than 48 h.29 Finally, the
`underlying cause of the hyperammonaemia has also
`been seen to be a determinant of outcome.30
`
`The meaning of routine biochemistry in the
`context of hyperammonaemia
`Although it is beyond the scope of this study to
`review all biochemical changes associated with
`
`hyperammonaemia, table 1 relates to changes in
`other routinely available biochemical investigations.
`These should be taken in any child being evaluated
`for potential hyperammonaemia where the diagnosis
`is uncertain.
`
`Limitations
`The challenge in ammonia testing is the large number
`of false positives that are generated by poor sampling
`and handling of specimens, most commonly due to a
`delay in transit to the laboratory. This has been shown
`to reduce the positive predictive value of ammonia
`down to as less as 60%.1 The recommendations from
`the UK National Metabolic Biochemistry Network
`state that ammonia should be measured as a free-
`flowing venous sample, with the avoidance of capil-
`lary samples, often difficult in a neonate, and should
`arrive at laboratory within 15 min, ideally on ice.22
`The reasons for these suggestions are that haemolysis
`secondary to capillary sampling results in increased
`interference in spectroscopic assay.11 31 The rapid
`
`76
`
`Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed 2012;97:72–77. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2011-300194
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 5 of 7
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`ep.bmj.com
`
`
`
`group.bmj.com on April 21, 2012 - Published by
`
`
`
`INTERPRETATIONS
`
`transit to the laboratory is essential, since ammonia
`is constantly being generated, by both continued red
`blood cell metabolism and the deamination of amino
`acids, particularly glutamine.32 While these are bio-
`logical process dependent on the degree of enzymatic
`activity, cooling with ice does not in itself prevent
`sample deterioration whose major cause is prolonged
`transit time or other delays in processing. The preven-
`tion of potential delay of transport or processing of
`the sample needs to be avoided, hence clinical staff
`should inform the laboratory early of an impending
`sample, documenting the time of sample collection.
`It is also here where the ice may help, as its presence
`maintains the focus of the teams involved that delayed
`processing is detrimental.
`It is to be noted that all these problems will cause
`a rise in ammonia and while it is the authors’ view
`that investigation of hyperammonaemia is still a vastly
`underperformed investigation, it should be noted
`that ammonia levels within the normal range do not
`need repeating unless the clinical status of the patient
`alters.
`Finally, hyperammonaemia is not a diagnosis in itself
`and while it is indicative of a degree of metabolic dys-
`function, more specialised investigations are required
`to establish the correct diagnosis. These must include
`evaluation of plasma and urinary amino acids, urine
`organic acids and plasma acylcarnitines, though the
`full range of these investigations should be discussed
`with the local metabolic centre.
`
`Future research
`The information gathered from measurement of
`plasma ammonia is limited, and it is an incomplete
`reflection of the intraglial and intraneuronal chemi-
`cal changes experienced by patients. Increasingly, it is
`these downstream cascades initiated by hyperammo-
`naemia that are the focus of research.6 Areas of investi-
`gation include the reduction of N-methyl-D-aspartate
`(NMDA) receptor-mediated excitotoxicity, caused by
`increased levels of glutamate, with NMDA receptor
`agonists having been shown to improve cortical neuro-
`nal survival in animal models. Nitric oxide production
`secondary to NMDA activation is another potential
`target for reduction of toxicity. Other potential treat-
`ments address the energy deficiencies that seem to
`occur in neurons and glial cells exposed to hyperam-
`monaemia. Examples of the later include the use of
`creatine to prevent the secondary creatine deficiencies
`and the use of acetyl-L-carnitine, which appears to
`increase the ATP and phosphocreatine levels.
`These are all exciting areas of research and raise
`the potential of improving the neurological outcome
`of patients. However, to date, the most important
`aspects to prevention of hyperammonaemia continue
`to be clinical awareness and willingness to perform of
`plasma ammonia testing.
`
`Quiz
`
`QUESTION 1
`Which one of the following is unlikely to cause an ammonia of
`500 μmol/l
`a) Ornithine transcarbamylase defi ciency
`b) Delayed processing of a sample
`c) Urine infection with urease-positive organisms
`d) A struggling neonate
`e) Propionic acidaemia
`QUESTION 2
`Which of the following statements is untrue?
`a) Most ammonia checkers have a maximum upper limit of
`286 μmol/l
`b) A respiratory alkalosis is an early sign of hyperammonaemia
`c) Portal systemic shunting is a recognised cause of
`hyperammonaemia in the newborn period
`d) Ammonia sampling can be adequately performed by
`capillary sampling
`e) There is an overall 94% survival rate in neonates whose
`maximal ammonia is <500 μmol/l
`QUESTION 3
`True or false
`a) Liver cirrhosis is a known complication of a urea cycle
`disorder
`b) Typical neonatal values for ammonia are 65 μmol/l
`c) Haemolysis increases the rate of ammonia production
`d) Cerebral oedema is the major cause of neonatal mortality in
`urea cycle disorders
`e) The citrin transporter transports aspartate into the
`mitochondria
`Answers to the quiz are on page 80
`
` ■
`
` ■
`
` ■
`
`Clinical bottom line
`Hyperammonaemia is a medical emergency and a delay
` ■
`in treatment may have profound consequences.
`Testing for ammonia should be considered in all
`patients with unexplained or unusual neurological
`symptoms, especially in neonates whose clinical
`history does not match the severity of their illness
`and or whose illness is unexplained.
`Care must be taken to ensure the laboratory receive
`an adequate sample.
`Ammonia results should be interpreted in light of
`both the clinical symptomatology and the routine
`biochemistry available, though definitive diagnosis
`requires specialised investigations.
`Acknowledgements The authors would like to
`acknowledge Dr JH Walter Royal Manchester
`Children’s Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester,
`M13 9WL, for use of figure 1.
`Competing interests None.
`Provenance and peer review Commissioned;
`externally peer reviewed.
`The reference list is published online only
`at http://ep.bmj.com/content/97/2
`
`Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed 2012;97:72–77. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2011-300194
`
`77
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 6 of 7
`
`

`

`
`
`ep.bmj.comDownloaded from
`
`
`
`group.bmj.com on April 21, 2012 - Published by
`
`
`
`How to use serum ammonia
`Alexander Broomfield and Stephanie Grunewald
`
`
`
` 2012 97: 72-77 originally published onlineArch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed
`November 18, 2011
`doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2011-300194
`
`Updated information and services can be found at:
`
`http://ep.bmj.com/content/97/2/72.full.html
`
`These include:
`
`References
`
`This article cites 29 articles, 8 of which can be accessed free at:
`
`http://ep.bmj.com/content/97/2/72.full.html#ref-list-1
`
`Email alerting
`service
`
`Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up in
`the box at the top right corner of the online article.
`
`Articles on similar topics can be found in the following collections
`
`  
`
`Metabolic disorders
`
` (39 articles)
`
`Topic
`Collections
`
`Notes
`
`To request permissions go to:
`
`http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
`
`To order reprints go to:
`http://journals.bmj.com/cgi/reprintform
`
`
`
`To subscribe to BMJ go to:
`
`http://group.bmj.com/subscribe/
`
`Page 7 of 7
`



`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket