throbber
Page 1
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`--------------------------------------
`LUPIN LTD and LUPIN
`PHARMACEUTICALS INC.,
`
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`HORIZON THERAPEUTICS, INC.,
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`--------------------------------------
`IPR2016-00829
`
`DEPOSITION OF KEITH K. VAUX,
`M.D., a Witness herein, taken by
`Petitioners at the offices of Goodwin
`Procter LLP, 620 Eighth Avenue, New York,
`New York, on Tuesday, January 31, 2017, at
`9:01 a.m., before Debra Stevens, a
`Certified Realtime and Registered
`Professional Reporter and Notary Public
`within and for the State of New York.
`
`12
`
`3
`4
`5
`
`6
`
`78
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-279-9424
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`212-490-3430
`
`Page 1 of 132
`
`Horizon Exhibit 2034
`Lupin v. Horizon
`IPR2017-01159
`
`

`

`Page 2
`
`A P P E A R A N C E S :
`GREEN, GRIFFITH & BORG-BREEN LLP
` Attorneys for Petitioner
`NBC Tower
`455 N. Cityfront Plaza Dr., Suite 3100
`Chicago, Illinois 60611
` BY: ROBERT F. GREEN, ESQ.
` rgreen@greengriffith.com
` EMER SIMIC, ESQ.
` esimic@greengriffith.com
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT &
`DUNNER, LLP
` Attorneys for Petitioner
`201 New York Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20001-4413
` BY: MAUREEN D. QUELER, ESQ.
` maureen.queler@finnegan.com
`
`GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
` Attorneys for Patent Owner
`The New York Times Building
`620 Eighth Avenue
`New York, New York 10018
` BY: ROBERT V. CERWINSKI, ESQ.
` rcerwinski@goodwinlaw.com
`
` * * *
`
`12
`
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`
`89
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-279-9424
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`212-490-3430
`
`Page 2 of 132
`
`

`

`Page 3
`
` E X A M I N A T I O N S
` Witness Page
` K. Vaux
` By Mr. Green 4
` By Mr. Cerwinski 107
`
` E X H I B I T S
`
` Horizon
` Exhibit Description Page
` Exh 2035 Dr. Vaux's bio web page 5
` from UC San Diego
`
` Exh 2036 "Novel Human 8
` Pathological Mutations"
` Exh 2037 Book review of "A 13
` Clinical Guide to
` Inherited Metabolic
` Deseases, 2nd ed."
`
`12
`
`3
`4
`
`5
`
`67
`
`8
`
`9
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-279-9424
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`212-490-3430
`
`Page 3 of 132
`
`

`

`Page 4
`
`Whereupon,
` K E I T H K. V A U X,
`having been first duly sworn/affirmed,
`was examined and testified as follows:
`EXAMINATION BY
`MR. GREEN:
` Q. Morning, Dr. Vaux.
` A. Good morning.
` Q. Would you state your full name
`for the record?
` A. Sure. Keith Kenneth Vaux.
` Q. I am going to start by handing
`you what has been previously marked as
`Lupin Exhibit 1003.
` A. Okay.
` Q. Is that your curriculum vitae?
` A. Yes, it is.
` Q. Do you see up near the top,
`under "business address" there is an entry
`for Point Loma Pediatrics?
` A. Right.
` Q. What is Point Loma Pediatrics?
` A. It is a pediatric clinic, a
`private pediatric clinic in Point Loma.
`
`12
`
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-279-9424
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`212-490-3430
`
`Page 4 of 132
`
`

`

`Page 5
`
` K. VAUX
` Q. Are you one of the owners of
`Point Loma Pediatrics?
` A. No. My wife owns it.
` Q. Do you work for Point Loma
`Pediatrics?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Is it fair to characterize Point
`Loma Pediatrics as a general pediatric
`practice?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Looking down the first page of
`Lupin Exhibit 1003, under "Employment" I
`see you have an entry for July 7, 2014, to
`present. It has "Director and Clinical
`Chief, Division of Medical Genetics at
`University of California, San Diego."
`Correct?
` A. That is correct.
` Q. I am going to hand you a
`document we are marking Horizon
`Exhibit 2035.
` (So marked for identification as
` Horizon Exhibit 2035.)
` Q. This was a page retrieved from
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-279-9424
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`212-490-3430
`
`Page 5 of 132
`
`

`

`Page 6
`
` K. VAUX
`the online website for the University of
`California San Diego. Do you recognize
`this page?
` A. I recognize all the elements in
`it. I am not sure I have seen the
`specific page.
` MR. CERWINSKI: Objection.
` Authenticity.
` Q. If you can take a look at the
`description under "Bio" I would like you
`to read through it since you don't
`recognize the page. If you can let me
`know, after you do that, if this is a
`correct statement of your background.
` (Pause)
` A. That is correct. The Jacobs
`Medical Center address at the top is
`probably not -- I am not technically
`located there nor do I have an office in
`Hillcrest, the second. Those are just
`general addresses. That would be the only
`thing I would correct on that.
` Q. With respect to the discussion
`of your bio on this page, is that correct?
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-279-9424
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`212-490-3430
`
`Page 6 of 132
`
`

`

`Page 7
`
` K. VAUX
` A. Yes, that is correct.
` Q. I note at the top portion of the
`bio, in the first paragraph -- I will read
`this into the record -- it says, "He has
`special interest in neurologic genetic
`diseases and conditions that are difficult
`to diagnose, as well as using next
`generation sequencing tools to diagnose
`rare conditions and understand the
`genetics of chronic common conditions."
` Did I read that correctly?
` A. You did. I think that at the
`beginning of the piece I also taught that
`I work on the diagnosis, evaluation and
`long-term care of patients with complex
`genetic disorder.
` Q. With respect to your interest in
`the identification of neurologic genetic
`diseases and conditions, are you involved
`in identifying the underlying genetic
`cause for conditions such as those?
` MR. CERWINSKI: Object to the
` form.
` A. Could you say it again, sir?
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-279-9424
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`212-490-3430
`
`Page 7 of 132
`
`

`

`Page 8
`
` K. VAUX
` Q. Sure. Is your emphasis, at
`least in part, looking for the underlying
`genetic mutation that causes diseases that
`fall in this category of neurologic
`genetic diseases?
` A. That is one subset of what I am
`interested in; yes.
` Q. Looking at your CV, on labeled
`page 7 of 9?
` A. Okay.
` Q. There is an entry number 16 that
`refers to a document that is titled "Novel
`Human Pathological Mutations."
` Do you see that?
` A. Yes, I do.
` Q. I am going to hand you Horizon
`Exhibit 2036.
` (So marked for identification as
` Horizon Exhibit 2036.)
` Q. Is Horizon Exhibit 2036 the
`document to which you refer in your CV
`under number entry 16?
` A. To which part in particular?
`This is a list of other mutations.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-279-9424
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`212-490-3430
`
`Page 8 of 132
`
`

`

`Page 9
`
` K. VAUX
` Q. Correct. So, if I can point you
`to the bottom of page 341?
` A. 341.
` MR. CERWINSKI: I will lodge an
` objection to authenticity.
` A. So, what you have provided me
`with here is a list of the mutations that
`were published in Human Genetics. And I
`was a participant in the identification of
`this particular gene.
` Q. You are referring to the entry
`at the bottom of numbered page 341 of
`Horizon Exhibit 3036?
` A. Correct.
` Q. And the gene mutation in this
`related to the disease condition known as
`Citrullinaemia?
` A. That is correct.
` Q. How do you pronounce that,
`Doctor?
` A. "Sit-rullin-emia."
` Q. Okay. Another reason why I
`decided not to go into biological
`sciences.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-279-9424
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`212-490-3430
`
`Page 9 of 132
`
`

`

`Page 10
`
` K. VAUX
` Just for the record, what is
`Citrullinaemia?
` A. It is an inborn error of
`metabolism.
` Q. With respect to the reference to
`individuals on this page, you are one of
`many. Is it fair to state that your
`interest and involvement with respect to
`the location and identification of the
`mutation, that was the reason why you
`participated in this study?
` MR. CERWINSKI: Objection to the
` form.
` A. What I am hearing you say is
`that the goal of this paper, from my
`participation, was to diagnose this
`condition. Is that what you are asking
`me?
` Q. To diagnose a potential cause
`for the condition?
` A. One of the reasons that I
`participated in this paper was because I
`diagnosed this condition in a patient and
`then identified what was responsible for
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-279-9424
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`212-490-3430
`
`Page 10 of 132
`
`

`

`Page 11
`
` K. VAUX
`that condition. So, we were able to
`identify a new gene.
` Q. So your participation in this
`study, then, resulted in the
`identification of the gene which is
`identified at the bottom of page 341 of
`this Exhibit 2036. Is that correct?
` MR. CERWINSKI: Objection to the
` form.
` A. I contributed, actually, several
`patients to the series that allowed the
`identification of the gene involved in
`this condition.
` Q. So your principal role in the
`identification of this gene was providing
`the patient information to assist in that?
` A. And identifying the diagnosis
`itself.
` Q. Turn back to your CV.
` A. Okay.
` Q. Under numbered publication 19 --
` A. Okay.
` Q. There is a reference to a
`document entitled "The Role of Molecular
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-279-9424
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`212-490-3430
`
`Page 11 of 132
`
`

`

`Page 12
`
` K. VAUX
`Testing and Enzyme Analysis in the
`Management of Hypomorphic
`Citrullinaemia--" or something close to
`that. Is that correct?
` A. That is correct.
` Q. Is the article that you have set
`forth under publication 19, then, the
`underlying study discussion that relates
`to the Exhibit 16 document that identifies
`the particular mutation?
` A. This was the initial paper that
`was published that set forth a variety of
`new genes involved in the Citrullinaemia.
` Q. And the study that is reflected
`in this document identified by publication
`19, was that the study from which the gene
`identification that is set forth in
`publication 16 resulted?
` A. Yes, I believe so. Yes.
` Q. Also on your CV, if you can turn
`to the page that is numbered 8 of 9 in the
`bottom right corner?
` A. 8 of 9.
` Q. The first publication that is
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-279-9424
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`212-490-3430
`
`Page 12 of 132
`
`

`

`Page 13
`
` K. VAUX
`listed as number 1, "A clinical guide to
`inherited metabolic diseases, 2nd
`edition," do you see that?
` A. I do.
` Q. I am going to hand you Horizon
`Exhibit 2037.
` (So marked for identification as
` Horizon Exhibit 2037).
` Q. Is the book review that is
`reflected in Horizon Exhibit 2037 the
`article that you have set forth here under
`"Other Publications" at number 1?
` A. I haven't seen it in this form,
`but it certainly looks like the one that I
`wrote.
` MR. CERWINSKI: Objection.
` Authenticity.
` Q. Was the review that you wrote
`published in the Journal of Heredity 2003?
` A. Yes, it was.
` Q. Was that article published in
`2003?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Do you have any reason to
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-279-9424
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`212-490-3430
`
`Page 13 of 132
`
`

`

`Page 14
`
` K. VAUX
`believe that this is not the review that
`is referenced at publication number 1
`under "Other Publications"?
` A. I have no reason to believe it's
`not.
` Q. If you just take a moment to
`look at the contents to again make sure
`that you have no issue with respect to
`this being the actual review that is
`referenced at publication number 1 under
`"Other Publications"?
` MR. CERWINSKI: Objection to the
` form.
` A. To the best of my recollection,
`this does look like the one that I wrote.
` Q. With respect to the underlying
`publication that you are reviewing that is
`the publication titled "A Clinical Guide
`to Inherited Metabolic Diseases 2nd
`Edition," you did not write that
`publication itself, right, the one --
` A. That is correct. This is a
`review.
` Q. Did you play any role in editing
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-279-9424
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`212-490-3430
`
`Page 14 of 132
`
`

`

`Page 15
`
` K. VAUX
`the publication "A Clinical Guide to
`Inherited Metabolic Diseases"?
` A. I did not.
` Q. And that publication, that
`Clinical Guide to Inherited Metabolic
`Diseases is a clinical guide. Is that
`correct?
` A. That is correct.
` Q. If you could for a moment,
`please, take a look at the entries under
`"Publications" and "Other Publications" on
`your CV, Lupin Exhibit 1003? Setting
`aside the publications 16 and 19 under the
`heading "Publications" and under "Other
`Publications," the one we discussed that
`is numbered 1, do any of the other
`publications that you set forth under
`those headings "Publications" and "Other
`Publications" relate to the treatment of
`urinary -- sorry -- urea cycle disorder?
` MR. CERWINSKI: Objection to the
` form.
` A. You are asking specifically
`about urea cycle defects?
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-279-9424
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`212-490-3430
`
`Page 15 of 132
`
`

`

`Page 16
`
` K. VAUX
` Q. Yes.
` A. There are not other specific
`publications related to that topic.
` Q. Are you a member of the Urea
`Cycle Disorders Consortium?
` A. What do you mean exactly by
`that, am I a member?
` Q. So, are you familiar with the
`consortium?
` A. I am.
` Q. And does it have a membership?
` A. I am not aware of the presence
`or absence of that.
` Q. So, you --
` A. Is it an interest group, or is
`it -- well, let it be.
` Q. Is anyone in the group at which
`you practice at University of California
`San Diego a member of the consortium?
` MR. CERWINSKI: Objection to the
` form. Objection; foundation.
` A. I am not aware of the presence
`or absence of any of my colleagues on such
`forum.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-279-9424
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`212-490-3430
`
`Page 16 of 132
`
`

`

`Page 17
`
` K. VAUX
` Q. Are you a member of the Society
`of Inherited Metabolic Disorders?
` A. I am not.
` Q. And are you a member of the
`Society For the Study of Inborn Errors of
`Metabolism?
` A. I am not.
` Q. Have you attended conferences
`held by the Society For Inherited
`Metabolic Disorders?
` A. Not that I am aware of.
` Q. Have you had any publications in
`The Journal For Inherited Metabolic
`Diseases?
` A. I have not.
` Q. Have you had any articles
`published in The Journal for Molecular
`Genetics and Metabolism?
` A. I have not.
` Q. Have you been a lead
`investigator for any clinical trial that
`involved the treatment of UCD patients?
` MR. CERWINSKI: Objection to the
` form.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-279-9424
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`212-490-3430
`
`Page 17 of 132
`
`

`

`Page 18
`
` K. VAUX
` A. I have been involved in other
`studies of inborn errors of metabolism,
`not specifically urea cycle defects.
` Q. And in my question I referred to
`UCD. You understood that to refer to urea
`cycle defects?
` A. I did.
` Q. Is it all right with you if I
`abbreviate "urea cycle defects" to "UCD"?
` A. No, I would ask -- yes. It's
`okay with me.
` Q. Thank you.
` A. You're welcome.
` Q. You are board certified in the
`field of pediatrics?
` A. That is correct.
` Q. Are you board certified in any
`other areas?
` A. No, just pediatrics.
` Q. You are not certified in the
`fields of clinical genetic or biochemical
`genetics?
` A. That is correct.
` Q. Have you received any grants
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-279-9424
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`212-490-3430
`
`Page 18 of 132
`
`

`

`Page 19
`
` K. VAUX
`that related to studies concerning the
`treatment of UCD?
` MR. CERWINSKI: Objection to the
` form.
` A. Specifically what kind of grants
`are you referring to?
` Q. Monetary grants such as those
`given by NIH or other institutions.
` A. Specifically related to UCD?
` Q. Yes.
` A. No.
` Q. I am going to hand you a
`document previously marked as Lupin
`Exhibit 1002. It's captioned "Declaration
`of Kenneth Vaux."
` A. "Vox"; excellent. I only use
`"Keith" in this.
` Q. Thank you for the correction.
` A. You are welcome.
` Q. Is this a declaration which you
`prepared?
` A. Yes. Actually, I believe this
`is the same one as the one I prepared.
` Q. If you could turn to paragraph
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-279-9424
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`212-490-3430
`
`Page 19 of 132
`
`

`

`Page 20
`
` K. VAUX
`19, which is on the bottom of the page
`numbered 11 of 57?
` A. Yes. I have it.
` Q. In paragraph 19 this is your
`expression of your opinion as to how a
`person of ordinary skill should be defined
`when taking into account the claims that
`are set forth in the patent that's
`involved in the IPR for which you are
`testifying today. Is that correct?
` MR. CERWINSKI: Objection to the
` form.
` A. Yes. This was my opinion.
` Q. If we could, perhaps, take a
`closer look at what you set forth as your
`definition of a person of ordinary skill
`in the art?
` A. Of course.
` Q. You state, for example, that it
`would be a physician with an MD degree
`with a residency in pediatrics or internal
`medicine and would have had specialized
`training in the diagnosis or treatment of
`inherited metabolic disorders such as UCDs
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-279-9424
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`212-490-3430
`
`Page 20 of 132
`
`

`

`Page 21
`
` K. VAUX
`and other nitrogen retention disorders.
`Correct?
` A. That is correct.
` Q. So, first, what do you mean by
`"specialized," when you refer to the type
`of training that a POSA should have had?
` A. This is direct experience or
`formal training, either one.
` Q. When you say direct experience
`or formal training, in what respect?
` A. During residency, exposure to
`inherited metabolic diseases. In absence
`of that, it would be additional classes,
`additional clinical experiences or other
`training.
` Q. So with respect to the term
`"inherited metabolic disorders" as you use
`it in paragraph 19, how many such
`disorders exist?
` MR. CERWINSKI: Objection to the
` form.
` A. There are extensive numbers. I
`don't believe I could give you an absolute
`number because with the onset of genetic
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-279-9424
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`212-490-3430
`
`Page 21 of 132
`
`

`

`Page 22
`
` K. VAUX
`testing there has been more that have been
`identified.
` Q. Is it fair to say it is in the
`hundreds?
` MR. CERWINSKI: Objection to the
` form.
` A. I wouldn't be able to even give
`a general estimate.
` Q. And UCD is just one of those
`many inherited metabolic disorders?
` A. That is correct.
` Q. So, is my understanding correct
`that using your definition of a person of
`ordinary skill in the art, a physician
`that meets the other criteria, who then
`obtained specialized training in the
`diagnosis or treatment concerning an
`inherited metabolic disorder other than
`UCD would qualify as a person of ordinary
`skill in the art. Correct?
` MR. CERWINSKI: Objection to the
` form.
` A. There are too many turns in
`that. Would you say it again, please?
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-279-9424
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`212-490-3430
`
`Page 22 of 132
`
`

`

`Page 23
`
` K. VAUX
` Q. Let me see if I can shorten it
`up.
` A. Thank you.
` Q. Your POSA could be an individual
`who has specialized training in diagnosis
`or treatment of inherited metabolic
`disorders other than UCD. Is that
`correct?
` A. That is correct.
` Q. And in your definition, is it
`also correct that a POSA could have
`specialized training with respect to the
`diagnosis of UCD but not with respect to
`the treatment of UCD?
` MR. CERWINSKI: Objection to the
` form.
` A. I would have difficulty
`generalizing that.
` Q. What I am trying to do is
`understand the specialized training in the
`diagnosis or treatment. Again, if an
`individual had the training in how to
`diagnose, for example, UCD but no training
`in the treatment, that person would also
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-279-9424
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`212-490-3430
`
`Page 23 of 132
`
`

`

`Page 24
`
` K. VAUX
`qualify as a POSA in your definition. Is
`that correct?
` A. It would be, again, very hard
`for me to imagine that that would occur.
` Q. Hypothetically speaking, if such
`a POSA existed and had such training only
`with respect to diagnosis and not with
`respect to treatment, that person would
`fall within your definition of a POSA?
` A. That is correct, as a very
`hypothetical. But the specialized
`training is involved in identifying,
`diagnosing and treating patients.
` MR. CERWINSKI: I will object as
` an incomplete hypothetical.
` Q. So, again turning back to
`paragraph 19, if we have an individual who
`is a physician with an MD degree and a
`residency in pediatrics or internal
`medicine, how much specialized training
`would that individual need to qualify as a
`POSA under your definition?
` A. There would not be any limit or
`any -- most of the pediatric and internal
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-279-9424
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`212-490-3430
`
`Page 24 of 132
`
`

`

`Page 25
`
` K. VAUX
`medicine residencies would cover the vast
`majority of the basic knowledge. There is
`also quite a bit that's obtained in the MD
`degree.
` So, I don't think that there
`would be an absolute minimum amount or an
`absolute maximum amount.
` Q. In order to qualify under that
`definition, in what subject area would the
`residency have been required?
` MR. CERWINSKI: Object to the
` form.
` A. Can you say it again?
` Q. So if the individual we are
`talking about went through a residency, is
`there a particular protocol that that
`resident would have had to have undergone
`to receive that training?
` MR. CERWINSKI: Objection to the
` form.
` A. There are standards for
`education both as an MD and as a resident.
`They have standards of exposure and
`knowledge that are frequently tested and
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-279-9424
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`212-490-3430
`
`Page 25 of 132
`
`

`

`Page 26
`
` K. VAUX
`outlined in multiple journals -- multiple
`documents, that require a person with an
`MD to have had exposure to what I
`mentioned, as well as a residency in
`pediatrics to have exposure to inherited
`metabolic disorders.
` Q. So the residency would have been
`required to have been in the field of
`pediatrics to satisfy your definition of
`POSA?
` A. Or internal medicine.
` MR. CERWINSKI: You should pause
` before giving your answer so I have
` time to lodge an objection.
` THE WITNESS: Got it.
` MR. CERWINSKI: Thanks.
` Q. I am going to hand you
`previously marked Lupin Exhibit 1001.
`It's United States Patent 9,095,559.
` Dr. Vaux, you have reviewed this
`patent?
` A. I have.
` Q. I would like for you to turn to
`the claims, which start at page numbered
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-279-9424
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`212-490-3430
`
`Page 26 of 132
`
`

`

`Page 27
`
` K. VAUX
`21 of 22 in Lupin Exhibit 1001.
` If you will also look at the
`same time to your declaration at pages 52
`and 54 -- sorry. Paragraphs 52 and 54.
`My questions will be directed toward the
`interpretation of claims 1 and 2 to start
`with. It might be useful for you,
`Dr. Vaux, if you looked at those two
`paragraphs to refresh your recollection.
` A. I am sorry. Could you say again
`which ones?
` Q. 52 and 54.
` Before I ask the question, I'd
`like to see if we can agree on another
`shortened term. If you look at, for
`example, claim 1, you see the chemical
`identified as glyceryl Tri-[4-
`phenylbutyrate]?
` Do you see that?
` A. I do.
` Q. Is it satisfactory with you if I
`refer to that simply as glyceryl
`phenylbutyrate?
` A. That is okay with me.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-279-9424
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`212-490-3430
`
`Page 27 of 132
`
`

`

`Page 28
`
` K. VAUX
` Q. With that understanding, do you
`agree that claims 1 and 2 relate to
`adjusting the dose of glyceryl
`phenylbutyrate to be administered to a
`patient who is being treated for UCD, has
`received a previous dose of glyceryl
`phenylbutyrate, has been determined to
`have a fasting plasma ammonia level less
`than the upper limit of normal and has a
`fasting plasma ammonia level that is
`greater than half the upper limit of
`normal?
` MR. CERWINSKI: Objection to the
` form.
` A. You are asking me specifically
`if, in my statement, or in your statement,
`the question is -- I am a little confused
`as to which one you want me to say.
` So, in my statement 52, the 1
`and 2 are directed at adjusting a dosage
`of glyceryl phenylbutyrate which has been
`previously administered to a subject. I
`agree with that; yes.
` And 54, I refer specifically to
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-279-9424
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`212-490-3430
`
`Page 28 of 132
`
`

`

`Page 29
`
` K. VAUX
`your patent application, 1001 and put in
`quotation "who has a fasting plasma
`ammonia level less than the upper limit of
`normal."
` At no time did I say in there
`about half. So, I would agree with
`everything except the statement about
`half.
` Q. I wanted to refresh your
`recollection as to what you had in your
`declaration. But what I would like to
`know now, after you have had the
`opportunity to read through those
`paragraphs as well as claims 1 and 2, if
`you agree that what both claim 1 and claim
`2 require is really all of those
`attributes with respect to the patient:
`that the patient is being treated for UCD,
`that the patient has been given a previous
`dose of glyceryl phenylbutyrate, that the
`patient has been determined to have a
`fasting plasma ammonia level that is less
`than the upper limit of normal and that
`the fasting plasma ammonia level for that
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-279-9424
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`212-490-3430
`
`Page 29 of 132
`
`

`

`Page 30
`
` K. VAUX
`patient is greater than half the upper
`limit of normal.
` MR. CERWINSKI: Objection to the
` form. Calls for a legal conclusion.
` Objection to form; and objection it
` calls for a legal conclusion.
` A. I am still not sure exactly what
`you are asking me here. Do you want me to
`comment on claim 1 and 2, that they have
`those components that are considered
`together? Or -- I am not clear on what
`exactly you want me to respond to.
` Q. Sure. Have you been involved
`with any patent prosecution for patents of
`your own?
` A. Of my own patents, I have not.
` Q. And have you reviewed patents
`prior to your becoming involved in the
`present IPR that brings us here today?
` A. I have.
` Q. And have you, prior to being
`involved in this present IPR, looked at
`the claims in patents?
` A. I have.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-279-9424
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`212-490-3430
`
`Page 30 of 132
`
`

`

`Page 31
`
` K. VAUX
` Q. And have you looked at the
`claims to determine what subject matter is
`covered by such claims?
` MR. CERWINSKI: Objection to the
` form.
` A. Say that last one again?
` Q. Sure. And have you looked at
`patent claims, prior to your involvement
`in the present IPR, to determine what the
`subject matter is that is covered by those
`claims?
` MR. CERWINSKI: Objection to the
` form.
` A. That last part I am not sure I
`can answer.
` Q. In your declaration you have
`provided some opinions that apply prior
`art to the claims of this patent.
`Correct?
` A. That is correct.
` Q. What I am trying to determine is
`whether you have the same understanding as
`I expressed for what the claim requires in
`order to define the invention that falls
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-279-9424
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`212-490-3430
`
`Page 31 of 132
`
`

`

`Page 32
`
` K. VAUX
`within claim 1 and claim 2.
` MR. CERWINSKI: Objection to the
` form.
` A. Right. And I stated this in 52
`and in 54, of what I understand to be
`claimed in 1 and 2. I don't think there
`is any variation off of that.
` Q. I think you perhaps identified
`the only element, though, that was not in
`those two paragraphs, and that is the
`requirement that the patient being treated
`has a fasting blood ammonia level that's
`greater than half the upper limit of
`normal.
` MR. CERWINSKI: Objection to the
` form.
` A. If I am hearing you correct, the
`question that you are asking me is do I
`see on Exhibit 1001 that adjusting
`includes a fasting plasma ammonia level
`greater than half the upper limit of
`normal for the plasma ammonia level. Is
`that what you are asking me? Do I see
`that on the claim?
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-279-9424
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`212-490-3430
`
`Page 32 of 132
`
`

`

`Page 33
`
` K. VAUX
` Q. Let's start with that.
` A. Okay. Yes, I see that on the
`claim.
` Q. And do you understand, then,
`that this claim requires that the patient
`be in such a state that the measured
`fasting blood ammonia level is not only
`below the upper limit of normal but is
`also greater than half the upper limit of
`normal?
` A. Yes, I do see that in item 1(c).
` Q. And when you were evaluating the
`prior art for purposes of your
`declaration, did you take into account the
`four factors, as I expressed, that is
`required for the patient being treated;
`that is, that the patient is being treated
`for UCD, that the patient has had a
`previous dose of glyceryl phenylbutyrate,
`that the patient's fasting plaza ammonia
`level is less than the upper limit of
`normal, and that the fasting plasma
`ammonia level for that patient is greater
`than half the upper limit of normal?
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-279-9424
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`212-490-3430
`
`Page 33 of 132
`
`

`

`Page 34
`
` K. VAUX
` A. Yes; that would be what I did
`consider.
` Q. If you could look at claim 3?
` A. Okay.
` Q. In claim 3, if you compare claim
`3 to claims 1 and 2, there is no
`requirement in claim 3 for the pati

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket