`
`_________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_________________
`
`TWITTER, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`YOUTOO TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`_________________
`
`Case IPR2017-01133
`Patent 8,601,506
`
`_________________
`
`TWITTER, INC.’S OPPOSITION
`TO PATENT OWNER’S MOTION TO
`WITHDRAW AS LEAD AND BACKUP COUNSEL OF RECORD
`
`
`
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`IPR2017-01133
`Patent 8,601,506
`
`Page(s)
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 1
`
`II. YOUTOO HAS NOT FILED
`THE REQUIRED POWER OF ATTORNEY ................................................ 1
`
`III. THE BOARD SHOULD NOT ALLOW YOUTOO TO
`MANIPULATE THE SCHEDULE BY CHANGING ITS COUNSEL ......... 2
`
`IV. CONCLUSION ................................................................................................ 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page i
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01133
`Patent 8,601,506
`
`LIST OF PREVIOUSLY FILED EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibits 1001-1017: Filed and served March 24, 2017 with Twitter’s Petition for
`
`Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 8,601,506.
`
`Exhibit 1018: Filed and served October 18, 2017 with Twitter’s Unopposed
`
`Motion for Pro Hac Vice of Robert T. Cruzen.
`
`
`
`Page ii
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01133
`Patent 8,601,506
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Petitioner Twitter, Inc. (“Petitioner”) opposes Youtoo Technologies, LLC’s
`
`Motion to Withdraw as Counsel (Paper 12) (the “Motion”) for at least two reasons.
`
`First, Youtoo has not filed an updated power of attorney, and the Board should not
`
`authorize any dismissal without Youtoo making such arrangements. Second, Twitter
`
`is concerned that Youtoo is using its change of counsel as a pretext to seek delays
`
`and modification of the Scheduling Order. For at least these reasons, explained more
`
`fully below, the Board should not authorize any of Youtoo’s counsel to withdraw
`
`under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(b).
`
`II. YOUTOO HAS NOT FILED
`THE REQUIRED POWER OF ATTORNEY
`
`If Youtoo’s backup and lead counsel wish to simultaneously withdraw,
`
`Youtoo must first designate appropriate replacements by filing an updated power of
`
`attorney. 37 C.F.R. § 42.10. Youtoo has not done so. Thus, the Board should not
`
`grant any of Youtoo’s counsel permission to withdraw without Youtoo formalizing
`
`its arrangements for substitute counsel and filing an updated power of attorney. See
`
`Masterimage 3D, Inc. v. Reald Inc., Case No. IPR2015-00035, Paper 85 at 3-4
`
`(PTAB Jan. 13, 2017) (denying petitioner’s counsel’s request to file a motion to
`
`withdraw because petitioner had not filed a new power of attorney reflecting the
`
`change in counsel in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(b)).
`
`TWITTER’S OPPOSITION TO PATENT
`OWNER’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS
`LEAD AND BACKUP COUNSEL OF RECORD
`
`Page 1
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01133
`Patent 8,601,506
`
`III. THE BOARD SHOULD NOT ALLOW YOUTOO TO
`MANIPULATE THE SCHEDULE BY CHANGING ITS COUNSEL
`
`Twitter opposes its counsels’ requested withdrawals to the extent it would
`
`result in any impact to the current schedule. Youtoo’s Patent Owner Response in
`
`this proceeding is due December 14, 2017. Additionally, Youtoo has other Patent
`
`Owner Responses due sooner in other inter partes review proceedings filed by
`
`Twitter; namely IPR2017-00829 and IPR2017-00830. In those proceedings, Youtoo
`
`sought and obtained a schedule modification.
`
`Although this proceeding is on a different schedule, Twitter is concerned that
`
`Youtoo may similarly attempt to manipulate the schedule in this proceeding as a
`
`result of its change of counsel. However, Youtoo has not approached Twitter about
`
`extending the schedule in this case, and Twitter would oppose such a request if
`
`requested.
`
`IV. CONCLUSION
`
`For each of the reasons discussed above, the Board should deny the Motion to
`
`Withdraw.
`
`Dated: November 9, 2017
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`By: /Todd M.Siegel/
`Todd M. Siegel (Registration No. 73,232)
`todd.siegel@klarquist.com
`KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP
`One World Trade Center, Suite 1600
`
`TWITTER’S OPPOSITION TO PATENT
`OWNER’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS
`LEAD AND BACKUP COUNSEL OF RECORD
`
`Page 2
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01133
`Patent 8,601,506
`
`121 S.W. Salmon Street
`Portland, Oregon 97204
`Tel: 503-595-5300
`Fax: 503-595-5301
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`TWITTER’S OPPOSITION TO PATENT
`OWNER’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS
`LEAD AND BACKUP COUNSEL OF RECORD
`
`Page 3
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01133
`Patent 8,601,506
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that on November 9, 2017, a complete copy of
`
`Twitter, Inc.’s Opposition to Patent Owner’s Motion to Withdraw as Lead and
`
`Backup Counsel of Record, was served on counsel for Youtoo Technologies, LLC
`
`Spencer C. Patterson
`Grable Martin Fulton PLLC
`1914 Skillman St., Ste. 110-144,
`Dallas, TX 75206
`Tel: 214- 396-8601
`Fax: 214- 988-0775
`Email: spatterson@gchub.com
`
`
`
`via electronic mail as follows:
`
`Scott McKeown
`Oblon, McClelland, Maier
` & Neustadt, LLP
`1940 Duke Street
`Alexandria, Virginia 22314
`Tel: 703-412-6297
`Fax: 703-413-2220
`Email: cpdocketmckeown@oblon.com
`
`Stephen L. Levine
`Carrington, Coleman, Sloman &
` Blumenthal, L.L.P.
`901 Main Street, Suite 5500
`Dallas, Texas 75202
`Tel: 214-855-3025
`Fax: 214-855-1333
`Email: slevine@ccsb.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /Todd M. Siegel/
`Todd M. Siegel (Registration No. 73,232)
`todd.siegel@klarquist.com
`KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP
`One World Trade Center, Suite 1600
`121 S.W. Salmon Street
`Portland, Oregon 97204
`Tel: 503-595-5300
`Fax: 503-595-5301
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Page 1
`
`