`
`_________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_________________
`
`TWITTER, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`VIDSTREAM LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`_________________
`
`Case IPR2017-01133
`Patent 8,601,506
`_________________
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01133
`Patent 8,601,506
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70, the Board’s Scheduling Order dated May 14,
`
`2018 (Paper 35), Petitioner Twitter, Inc. respectfully requests oral argument,
`
`currently scheduled for October 19, 2018. Petitioner specifies, without intent to
`
`waive consideration of any issue not requested, the following issues to be argued:
`
` The interpretation of certain claim limitations of U.S. Patent No.
`
`8,601,506;
`
` Whether claims 1, 4-8, 11, 13-15, 23-26, 29, and 30 are unpatentable
`
`under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over “A Mobile Phone-based Context-aware
`
`Video Management Application,” authored by Lahti al., (“Lahti”) in
`
`view of U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2009/0157697 to
`
`Conway et al. (“Conway”), and further in view of U.S. Patent
`
`Application Publication No. 2002/0104099 to Novak (“Novak”);
`
` Whether claims 1, 4-8, 11, 13-15, 23-26, 29, and 30 are unpatentable
`
`under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Lahti in view of Novak, and further in view
`
`of “Current TV mobile” and “Current TV FAQ”;
`
` Whether to grant Petitioner’s Motion To Exclude Evidence.
`
`Petitioner reserves the right to address any arguments presented by Patent
`
`Owner and any other issues about which the Board wishes to hear argument during
`
`any oral hearing in this proceeding.
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`Page 1
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01133
`Patent 8,601,506
`
`
`
`As Petitioner anticipates the Board will likely determine to consolidate oral
`
`argument for this proceeding and co-pending proceeding IPR2017-01131, Petitioner
`
`requests 60 minutes to address all issues for both proceedings.
`
`Petitioner requests the ability to use audio visual equipment to display
`
`demonstrative exhibits, including the use of a projector and screen for PowerPoint
`
`display.
`
`Dated: September 14, 2018
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`By: /Todd M. Siegel/
`Todd M. Siegel (Registration No. 73,232)
`todd.siegel@klarquist.com
`KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP
`One World Trade Center, Suite 1600
`121 S.W. Salmon Street
`Portland, Oregon 97204
`Tel: 503-595-5300
`Fax: 503-595-5301
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`Page 2
`
`
`
`IPR2017-01133
`Patent 8,601,506
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`IN COMPLIANCE WITH 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e)(4)
`
`The undersigned certifies that on September 14, 2018, a complete copy of
`
`Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument was served on counsel for VidStream
`
`LLC via electronic mail as follows:
`
`Eagle Robinson – Lead Counsel
`eagle.robinson@nortonrosefulbright.com
`Eric Green – Back-Up Counsel
`eric.green@nortonrosefulbright.com
`Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP
`98 San Jacinto Blvd., Suite 1100
`Austin, TX 78701
`
`
`Eric Hall – Back-Up Counsel
`Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP
`1301 McKinney St., Ste. 5100
`Houston, TX 77010
`eric.hall@nortonrosefulbright.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /Todd M. Siegel/
`Todd M. Siegel (Registration No. 73,232)
`todd.siegel@klarquist.com
`KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP
`One World Trade Center, Suite 1600
`121 S.W. Salmon Street
`Portland, Oregon 97204
`Tel: 503-595-5300
`Fax: 503-595-5301
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`Page 1
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
