throbber
Case: 17-14849 Doc: 50 Filed: 04/11/18 Page: 1 of 4
`
`Dated: April 11, 2018
`
`The following is ORDERED:
`
`__________________________________________________________________
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
`
`In re
`
`Youtoo Technologies, LLC
`
`Debtor.
`
`Case No. 17-14849-JDL
`Chapter 7
`
`AGREED ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, TWITTER, INC.’S MOTION
`FOR RELIEF FROM THE AUTOMATIC STAY
`
`Now on the 11th day of April, 2018, there came on for hearing the Motion for Order (I)
`
`Holding That the Automatic Stay Does Not Apply Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(b)(4), or
`
`Alternatively, (II) Lifting the Automatic Stay for Cause Under 11 U.S.C. § 362(d)(1) and Waiving
`
`the 14-Day Stay Under Bankruptcy Rule 4001(a)(3) [Docket No. 21] (the “Motion”) filed by
`
`Twitter, Inc. (“Twitter”), Objection of the Trustee, Douglas Gould [Docket No. 27] and the
`
`Reply by Twitter [Docket No. 28]. This Court, having denied a portion of the Motion on March
`
`27, 2018 and ordered that the automatic stay applies [Docket No. 43], now considers Twitter’s
`
`remaining request for relief from the automatic stay. Having been informed that counsel for the
`
`1667974.1:812982:00351
`
`1
`
`Page 1 of 4
`
`

`

`Case: 17-14849 Doc: 50 Filed: 04/11/18 Page: 2 of 4
`
`Trustee and counsel for Twitter have reached an agreement regarding the requested relief, and
`
`the finding cause to approve such agreement; it is hereby:
`
`ORDERED that if the sale approved in this Court’s Agreed Order on Trustee’s Motion
`
`to Sell Property Free and Clear of Liens, Claims and Encumbrances (the “Sale Order”) [Dkt.
`
`No. 49] does not close on or before April 30, 2018, the automatic stay shall automatically lift to
`
`allow the Pending IPR Proceedings to proceed in front of the PTAB; and it is further
`
`ORDERED that, for the avoidance of doubt, upon closing of the sale approved in the
`
`Sale Order, the automatic stay shall no longer apply to the Pending IPR Proceedings in front of
`
`the PTAB.
`
`Findings of fact are based upon representation of counsel.
`
`###
`
`1667974.1:812982:00351
`
`2
`
`Page 2 of 4
`
`

`

`Case: 17-14849 Doc: 50 Filed: 04/11/18 Page: 3 of 4
`
`CONSENTED AND AGREED TO:
`
`By: /s/ O. Clifton Gooding
`O. Clifton Gooding (OBA #10315)
`THE GOODING LAW FIRM
`A Professional Corporation
`650 City Place Building
`204 North Robinson Avenue
`Oklahoma City, OK 73102
`Telephone: 405.948.1978
`Facsimile: 405.948.0864
`cgooding@goodingfirm.com
`
`COUNSEL FOR DEBTOR
`
`By: /s/ Douglas N. Gould
`Douglas N. Gould, OBA #3500
`DOUGLAS N. GOULD, P.L.C.
`5500 N. Western Avenue, Suite 150
`Oklahoma City, OK 73118
`Telephone: 405.286.3338
`dg@dgouldlaw.net
`
`COUNSEL FOR TRUSTEE
`
`By: /s/ Tami J. Hines
`Tami J. Hines, OBA #32014
`HALL, ESTILL, HARDWICK, GABLE,
`GOLDEN & NELSON, P.C.
`100 North Broadway, Suite 2900
`Oklahoma City, OK 73102-8865
`Telephone: 405.533.2828
`Facsimile: 405.533.2855
`Email thines@hallestill.com
`
`Steven W. Soule, OBA #13781
`William W. O’Conner, OBA #13200
`HALL, ESTILL, HARDWICK, GABLE,
`GOLDEN & NELSON, P.C.
`320 South Boston Avenue, Suite 200
`Tulsa, OK 74103-3706
`Telephone: 918.594.0400
`Facsimile: 918.594.0505
`Email ssoule@hallestill.com
`
`1667974.1:812982:00351
`
`3
`
`Page 3 of 4
`
`

`

`Case: 17-14849 Doc: 50 Filed: 04/11/18 Page: 4 of 4
`
`Email boconnor@hallestill.com
`
`and
`
`Stephen M. Pezanosky (admitted pro hac vice)
`Autumn D. Highsmith (admitted pro hac vice)
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700
`Dallas, TX 75219
`Telephone: 214.651.5000
`Facsimile: 214.651.5904
`Email stephen.pezanosky@haynesboone.com
`Email autumn.highsmith@haynesboone.com
`
`COUNSEL FOR TWITTER, INC.
`
`1667974.1:812982:00351
`
`4
`
`Page 4 of 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket