`
`IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
`
`In re
`
`Youtoo Technologies, LLC
`
`Debtor.
`
`Case No. 17-14849-JDL
`Chapter 7
`
`TWITTER, INC.’S NOTICE OF INTENT TO PRESENT
`WITNESSES AND EXHIBITS AT THE HEARING ON MARCH 21, 2018
`
`Pursuant to Local Rule 9014-1 & 9017-1, Twitter, Inc. (“Movant”) hereby gives
`
`notice of its intent to present witnesses and exhibits at the March 21, 2018 hearing on the
`
`following: Twitter, Inc.’s Motion for Order (I) Holding that the Automatic Stay Does Not
`
`Apply Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(b)(4), or Alternatively, (II) Lifting the Automatic Stay
`
`for Cause Under § 362(d)(1) and Waiting the 14-Day Stay Under Bankruptcy Rule
`
`4001(a)(3), Brief in Support Thereof, and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing [Dkt. No.
`
`21]; Debtor’s Response and Objection to Twitter, Inc.’s Motion to Lift the Automatic
`
`Stay [Dkt. No. 25]; the Trustee’s Objection to Creditor, Twitter, Inc.’s Motion for Relief
`
`or to Lift the Automatic Stay with Notice of Hearing [Dkt. No. 27]; and Twitter’s Reply
`
`in Support of Its Motion [Dkt. No. 28].
`
`1646068.1:812982:00351
`
`Page 1 of 4
`
`
`
`Case: 17-14849 Doc: 32 Filed: 03/01/18 Page: 2 of 4
`
`WITNESSES
`
`Name
`
`1.
`
`Designated Representative of Twitter
`
`2.
`
`Marsh Pitman
`
`3.
`
`Cheryl Hunter
`
`4.
`
`Douglas N. Gould, Chapter 7 Trustee
`
`5.
`
`Any witness called by any other party, including
`the Trustee or the Debtor.
`
`Subject
`
`Prejudice to Twitter and
`similarly situated innovators
`resulting from continuation
`of the automatic stay; status
`of IPR proceedings.
`alleged
`Proposed
`sale;
`estate;
`prejudice
`to
`the
`relationship
`between
`the
`equity “Funds” (as defined
`in Docket 25),
`individual
`investors, and the Debtor
`and/or parties asserting liens
`in the Debtor’s assets.
`Proposed
`sale;
`alleged
`prejudice
`to
`the
`estate;
`relationship
`between
`the
`equity “Funds” (as defined
`in Docket 25),
`individual
`investors, and the Debtor
`and/or parties asserting liens
`in the Debtor’s assets.
`Proposed
`sale;
`alleged
`prejudice
`to
`the
`estate;
`relationship
`between
`the
`equity “Funds” (as defined
`in Docket 25),
`individual
`investors, and the Debtor
`and/or parties asserting liens
`in the Debtor’s assets.
`
`1646068.1:812982:00351
`
`2
`
`Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`Case: 17-14849 Doc: 32 Filed: 03/01/18 Page: 3 of 4
`
`EXHIBITS
`
`General Description
`
`1.
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`12.
`
`13.
`14.
`
`Debtor’s Petition and Schedules.
`IPR2017-00829,
`Twitter,
`Inc. v. Youtoo Technologies, LLC, Case Nos.
`IPR2017-00830,
`IPR2017-01131;
`IPR2017-01133 (Order Dated 12/7/2017)
`[Filed as Docket 21-1]
`IPR2017-00829,
`Twitter,
`Inc. v. Youtoo Technologies, LLC, Case Nos.
`IPR2017-00830,
`IPR2017-01131;
`IPR2017-01133 (Order Dated 12/28/2017)
`[Filed as Docket 21-1]
`IPR2017-00829,
`Twitter,
`Inc. v. Youtoo Technologies, LLC, Case Nos.
`IPR2017-00830,
`IPR2017-01131;
`IPR2017-01133 (Order Dated 1/19/2018)
`[Filed as Docket 21-3]
`IPR2017-00829,
`Twitter,
`Inc. v. Youtoo Technologies, LLC, Case Nos.
`IPR2017-00830,
`IPR2017-01131;
`IPR2017-01133 (Order Dated 2/1/2018)
`[Filed as Docket 21-4]
`IPR2017-00829
`Twitter,
`Inc. v. Youtoo Technologies, LLC, Case No.
`(Decision Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review dated 8/11/2017).
`Twitter,
`Inc. v. Youtoo Technologies, LLC, Case No.
`IPR2017-00830
`(Decision Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review dated 8/11/2017).
`Twitter,
`Inc. v. Youtoo Technologies, LLC, Case No.
`IPR2017-01131
`(Decision Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review dated 10/2/2017).
`Twitter,
`Inc. v. Youtoo Technologies, LLC, Case No.
`IPR2017-01133
`(Decision Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review dated 10/2/2017).
`Robert F. Browne Family LLC v. Shafer, Case No. 17-14849 (Complaint Dated
`9/27/2016) [Filed Docket 28-1]
`Twitter, Inc. v. Youtoo Technologies, LLC, Case IPR2017-01131 (Patent
`Owner’s Power of Attorney Dated 4/21/2017) [Filed as Docket 28-2]
`Youtoo Technologies, LLC v. Twitter, Inc., Civ. A. No. 3:16-CV-00764-N
`(Order granting Twitter’s motion to dismiss as to the ’304 and ’506 Patents,
`dated 11/10/2016)
`Any Rebuttal Exhibits.
`Any Exhibits introduced by other parties and not objected to by Movant.
`
`Twitter anticipates that its portion of the hearing will take no more than 45 minutes.
`
`1646068.1:812982:00351
`
`3
`
`Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
`Case: 17-14849 Doc: 32 Filed: 03/01/18 Page: 4 of 4
`
`DATED: March 1, 2018
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /s/ Tami J. Hines
`Tami J. Hines, OBA #32014
`HALL, ESTILL, HARDWICK, GABLE,
`GOLDEN & NELSON, P.C.
`100 North Broadway, Suite 2900
`Oklahoma City, OK 73102-8865
`Telephone: (405) 533-2828
`Facsimile: (405) 533-2855
`Email thines@hallestill.com
`
`Steven W. Soule, OBA #13781
`William W. O’Conner, OBA #13200
`HALL, ESTILL, HARDWICK, GABLE,
`GOLDEN & NELSON, P.C.
`320 South Boston Avenue, Suite 200
`Tulsa, OK 74103-3706
`Telephone: (918) 594-0400
`Facsimile: (918) 594-0505
`Email ssoule@hallestill.com
`Email boconnor@hallestill.com
`
`and
`
`By: /s/ Stephen M. Pezanosky
`Stephen M. Pezanosky (admitted pro hac vice)
`Autumn D. Highsmith (admitted pro hac vice)
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700
`Dallas, TX 75219
`Telephone: (214) 651-5000
`Facsimile: (214) 651-5904
`Email stephen.pezanosky@haynesboone.com
`Email autumn.highsmith@haynesboone.com
`
`COUNSEL FOR TWITTER, INC.
`
`1646068.1:812982:00351
`
`4
`
`Page 4 of 4
`
`