throbber
Case: 17-14849 Doc: 32 Filed: 03/01/18 Page: 1 of 4
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
`
`In re
`
`Youtoo Technologies, LLC
`
`Debtor.
`
`Case No. 17-14849-JDL
`Chapter 7
`
`TWITTER, INC.’S NOTICE OF INTENT TO PRESENT
`WITNESSES AND EXHIBITS AT THE HEARING ON MARCH 21, 2018
`
`Pursuant to Local Rule 9014-1 & 9017-1, Twitter, Inc. (“Movant”) hereby gives
`
`notice of its intent to present witnesses and exhibits at the March 21, 2018 hearing on the
`
`following: Twitter, Inc.’s Motion for Order (I) Holding that the Automatic Stay Does Not
`
`Apply Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(b)(4), or Alternatively, (II) Lifting the Automatic Stay
`
`for Cause Under § 362(d)(1) and Waiting the 14-Day Stay Under Bankruptcy Rule
`
`4001(a)(3), Brief in Support Thereof, and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing [Dkt. No.
`
`21]; Debtor’s Response and Objection to Twitter, Inc.’s Motion to Lift the Automatic
`
`Stay [Dkt. No. 25]; the Trustee’s Objection to Creditor, Twitter, Inc.’s Motion for Relief
`
`or to Lift the Automatic Stay with Notice of Hearing [Dkt. No. 27]; and Twitter’s Reply
`
`in Support of Its Motion [Dkt. No. 28].
`
`1646068.1:812982:00351
`
`Page 1 of 4
`
`

`

`Case: 17-14849 Doc: 32 Filed: 03/01/18 Page: 2 of 4
`
`WITNESSES
`
`Name
`
`1.
`
`Designated Representative of Twitter
`
`2.
`
`Marsh Pitman
`
`3.
`
`Cheryl Hunter
`
`4.
`
`Douglas N. Gould, Chapter 7 Trustee
`
`5.
`
`Any witness called by any other party, including
`the Trustee or the Debtor.
`
`Subject
`
`Prejudice to Twitter and
`similarly situated innovators
`resulting from continuation
`of the automatic stay; status
`of IPR proceedings.
`alleged
`Proposed
`sale;
`estate;
`prejudice
`to
`the
`relationship
`between
`the
`equity “Funds” (as defined
`in Docket 25),
`individual
`investors, and the Debtor
`and/or parties asserting liens
`in the Debtor’s assets.
`Proposed
`sale;
`alleged
`prejudice
`to
`the
`estate;
`relationship
`between
`the
`equity “Funds” (as defined
`in Docket 25),
`individual
`investors, and the Debtor
`and/or parties asserting liens
`in the Debtor’s assets.
`Proposed
`sale;
`alleged
`prejudice
`to
`the
`estate;
`relationship
`between
`the
`equity “Funds” (as defined
`in Docket 25),
`individual
`investors, and the Debtor
`and/or parties asserting liens
`in the Debtor’s assets.
`
`1646068.1:812982:00351
`
`2
`
`Page 2 of 4
`
`

`

`Case: 17-14849 Doc: 32 Filed: 03/01/18 Page: 3 of 4
`
`EXHIBITS
`
`General Description
`
`1.
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`12.
`
`13.
`14.
`
`Debtor’s Petition and Schedules.
`IPR2017-00829,
`Twitter,
`Inc. v. Youtoo Technologies, LLC, Case Nos.
`IPR2017-00830,
`IPR2017-01131;
`IPR2017-01133 (Order Dated 12/7/2017)
`[Filed as Docket 21-1]
`IPR2017-00829,
`Twitter,
`Inc. v. Youtoo Technologies, LLC, Case Nos.
`IPR2017-00830,
`IPR2017-01131;
`IPR2017-01133 (Order Dated 12/28/2017)
`[Filed as Docket 21-1]
`IPR2017-00829,
`Twitter,
`Inc. v. Youtoo Technologies, LLC, Case Nos.
`IPR2017-00830,
`IPR2017-01131;
`IPR2017-01133 (Order Dated 1/19/2018)
`[Filed as Docket 21-3]
`IPR2017-00829,
`Twitter,
`Inc. v. Youtoo Technologies, LLC, Case Nos.
`IPR2017-00830,
`IPR2017-01131;
`IPR2017-01133 (Order Dated 2/1/2018)
`[Filed as Docket 21-4]
`IPR2017-00829
`Twitter,
`Inc. v. Youtoo Technologies, LLC, Case No.
`(Decision Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review dated 8/11/2017).
`Twitter,
`Inc. v. Youtoo Technologies, LLC, Case No.
`IPR2017-00830
`(Decision Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review dated 8/11/2017).
`Twitter,
`Inc. v. Youtoo Technologies, LLC, Case No.
`IPR2017-01131
`(Decision Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review dated 10/2/2017).
`Twitter,
`Inc. v. Youtoo Technologies, LLC, Case No.
`IPR2017-01133
`(Decision Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review dated 10/2/2017).
`Robert F. Browne Family LLC v. Shafer, Case No. 17-14849 (Complaint Dated
`9/27/2016) [Filed Docket 28-1]
`Twitter, Inc. v. Youtoo Technologies, LLC, Case IPR2017-01131 (Patent
`Owner’s Power of Attorney Dated 4/21/2017) [Filed as Docket 28-2]
`Youtoo Technologies, LLC v. Twitter, Inc., Civ. A. No. 3:16-CV-00764-N
`(Order granting Twitter’s motion to dismiss as to the ’304 and ’506 Patents,
`dated 11/10/2016)
`Any Rebuttal Exhibits.
`Any Exhibits introduced by other parties and not objected to by Movant.
`
`Twitter anticipates that its portion of the hearing will take no more than 45 minutes.
`
`1646068.1:812982:00351
`
`3
`
`Page 3 of 4
`
`

`

`Case: 17-14849 Doc: 32 Filed: 03/01/18 Page: 4 of 4
`
`DATED: March 1, 2018
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /s/ Tami J. Hines
`Tami J. Hines, OBA #32014
`HALL, ESTILL, HARDWICK, GABLE,
`GOLDEN & NELSON, P.C.
`100 North Broadway, Suite 2900
`Oklahoma City, OK 73102-8865
`Telephone: (405) 533-2828
`Facsimile: (405) 533-2855
`Email thines@hallestill.com
`
`Steven W. Soule, OBA #13781
`William W. O’Conner, OBA #13200
`HALL, ESTILL, HARDWICK, GABLE,
`GOLDEN & NELSON, P.C.
`320 South Boston Avenue, Suite 200
`Tulsa, OK 74103-3706
`Telephone: (918) 594-0400
`Facsimile: (918) 594-0505
`Email ssoule@hallestill.com
`Email boconnor@hallestill.com
`
`and
`
`By: /s/ Stephen M. Pezanosky
`Stephen M. Pezanosky (admitted pro hac vice)
`Autumn D. Highsmith (admitted pro hac vice)
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700
`Dallas, TX 75219
`Telephone: (214) 651-5000
`Facsimile: (214) 651-5904
`Email stephen.pezanosky@haynesboone.com
`Email autumn.highsmith@haynesboone.com
`
`COUNSEL FOR TWITTER, INC.
`
`1646068.1:812982:00351
`
`4
`
`Page 4 of 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket