`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________________________
`
`TWITTER, INC.
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`VIDSTREAM, LLC
`
`Patent Owner
`
`_____________________________
`
`Case IPR2017-01131
`U.S. Patent No. 8,464,304
`(Claims 1, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11-17, 19-26, and 28-30)
`_____________________________
`
`PATENT OWNER VIDSTREAM LLC’S
`REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`73436087.1
`
`
`
`Case IPR2017-01131
`Patent 8,464,304
`
`Pursuant to the Board’s most-recent Scheduling Order dated August 30, 2018
`
`(Paper 56), Patent Owner respectfully requests oral argument for all grounds now
`
`instituted in the proceedings of Cases IPR2017-01131 and IPR2017-01133, with one
`
`(1) hour allotted to each side.
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70, and without intending to waive consideration
`
`of any issue not requested, Patent Owner specifies that the issues to be argued
`
`include:
`
`1. the grounds of unpatentability instituted by the Board in Paper 8 of Case
`
`IPR2017-01131, including: Ground 1 (claims 1, 4, 5, 8, 9, 14-16, 26,
`
`and 28 as obvious over Lahti, Current TV Mobile, and Current TV
`
`FAQ); Ground 2 (claim 11 as obvious over Lahti, Current TV Mobile,
`
`Current TV FAQ, and Washington); Ground 3 (claims 12, 13, 29, and
`
`30 as obvious over Lahti, Current TV Mobile, Current TV FAQ,
`
`Washington, and Franken); Ground 4 (claims 17 and 19-21 as obvious
`
`over Lahti, Chen, and APA); Ground 5 (claims 22-25 as obvious over
`
`Lahti, Current TV Mobile, Current TV FAQ, and APA); and Ground 6
`
`(claims 1, 4, 5, and 9 as anticipated by Lahti);
`
`2. the grounds of unpatentability instituted by the Board in Paper 8 of Case
`
`IPR2017-01133, including: Ground 1 (claims 1, 4-8, 11, 13-15, 23-26,
`
`29, and 30 as obvious over Lahti, Conway, and Novak); and Ground 2
`
`73436087.1
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case IPR2017-01131
`Patent 8,464,304
`
`(claims 1, 4-8, 11, 13-15, 23-26, 29, and 30 as obvious over Lahti,
`
`Novak, Current TV Mobile, and Current TV FAQ); and
`
`3.
`
`all other issues the Board deems necessary for issuing a final written
`
`decision.
`
`Patent Owner also requests the ability to use audio-visual equipment to
`
`display demonstrative exhibits, including the use of a projector and screen.
`
`September 14, 2018
`
`/Eagle H. Robinson/
`Eagle H. Robinson
`
`
`73436087.1
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned certifies that on
`
`September 14, 2018, a complete copy of PATENT OWNER VIDSTREAM LLC’S
`
`REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT was served on the following:
`
`David L. McCombs, Reg. No. 32,271
`Haynes and Boone, LLP
`2323 Victory Ave. Suite 700
`Dallas, TX 75219
`T: 214-651-5533
`F: 214-200-0853
`
`
`Gregory P. Huh, Reg. No. 70,480
`T: 972-739-6939
`Theodore M. Foster, Reg. No. 57,456
`T: 972-739-8649
`Raghav Bajaj, Reg. No. 66,630
`T: 512-867-8520
`Haynes and Boone, LLP
`2323 Victory Ave. Suite 700
`Dallas, TX 75219
`F: 214-200-0853
`
`Sonal Mehta, pro hac vice
`Durie Tangri LLP
`217 Leidesdorff St.
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`T: 415-362-6666
`F: 415-236-6300
`
`via email (by consent), as follows:
`
`david.mccombs.ipr@haynesboone.com
`gregory.huh.ipr@haynesboone.com
`ipr.theo.foster@haynesboone.com
`raghav.bajaj.ipr@haynesboone.com
`smehta@durietangri.com
`
`/Eagle H. Robinson/
`Eagle H. Robinson (Reg. No. 61,361)
`
`73436087.1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
