throbber

`
`EXHIBIT
`EXHIBIT
`1008
`1008
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`C.A. No.
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`) )
`
`) )
`
`) )
`
`) )
`
`)
`
`FATPIPE,INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`VIPTELA,INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`Plaintiff FatPipe, Inc. (“FatPipe” or “Plaintiff’), by and through its undersigned counsel,
`
`files this Complaint against Defendant Viptela, Inc. (“Viptela” or “Defendant”) as follows:
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`
`1. This is an action for patent infringementarising underthe patent laws of the United
`
`States, 35 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.
`
`PARTIES
`
`2. FatPipe is a Utah company with a principal place of business at 4455 South 700
`
`East, Salt Lake City, Utah 84107.
`
`3. On information and belief, Viptela is a company incorporated under the laws of the
`
`State of Delaware and hasa principal place of business at 1732 North First St., Suite 600, San
`
`Jose, California 95112.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`4. This action arises under the Patent Lawsof the United States, 35 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.,
`
`including 35 U.S.C. §§ 271, 281, 283, 284, and 285.
`
`5. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this case for patent infringement
`
`under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a).
`
`Viptela, Inc. - Exhibit 1008
`Page 1
`
`Viptela, Inc. - Exhibit 1008
`Page 1
`
`

`

`6. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Viptela because, among other things,
`
`Viptela is incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware and/or has purposefully availed
`
`itself of the privilege of conducting activities within this Judicial District.
`
`7. Venueis properin this Judicial District under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 and 1400(b).
`
`PATENTS
`
`8. On August 10, 2004, U.S. Patent Number 6,775,235, entitled “Tools and techniques
`
`for directing packets over disparate networks”(the “’235 Patent”) was duly and legally issued by
`
`the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A true and correct copy of the ’235 Patent is
`
`attached as Exhibit “A”to this Complaint.
`
`9. On July 29, 2008, U.S. Patent Number 7,406,048, entitled “Tools and techniques
`
`for directing packets over disparate networks”(the “’048 Patent”) was duly and legally issued by
`
`the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A true and correct copy of the ’048 Patent is
`
`attached as Exhibit “B” to this Complaint.
`
`10. FatPipe is the exclusive licensee of the ’235 Patent and ’048 Patent (collectively
`
`the “patents-in-suit’’) with all substantial rights in the patents-in-suit, including the right to assert
`
`all causes of action arising under the patents-in-suit and the right to any remediesfor infringement.
`
`COUNT I - INFRINGEMENTOF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,775,235
`
`11. The allegations set forth in the foregoing paragraphs 1
`
`through 10 are hereby
`
`realleged and incorporated herein by reference.
`
`12. Upon information andbelief, in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), Viptela has directly
`
`infringed and continues to directly infringe, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents,at least
`
`claim 5 of the ’235 Patent by making, using, offering for sale, selling, or importing devices or
`
`systems,
`
`in this judicial district and elsewhere in the United States (directly or through
`
`intermediaries), that, alone or in combination with other devices and/or systems, perform the steps
`
`-2-
`
`Viptela, Inc. - Exhibit 1008
`Page 2
`
`Viptela, Inc. - Exhibit 1008
`Page 2
`
`

`

`of (i) obtaining at least two known location address ranges that have associated networks; (ii)
`
`obtaining topology information that specifies associated networks, which provide, when working,
`
`connectivity between a current location and at least one destination location; (iii) receiving at the
`
`current location a packetthat identifies a particular destination location by specifying a destination
`
`address for the destination location; (iv) determining whether the destination address lies within a
`
`known location address range; (v) selecting a network path from among paths to disparate
`
`associated networks, said networks being in parallel at the current location, each of said networks
`
`specified in the topology information as capable of providing connectivity between the current
`
`location and the destination location; and (vi) forwarding the packet on the selected network path.
`
`13. Viptela’s infringing products and services include, without limitation, Viptela’s
`
`SD-WANSystem and associated Secure Extensible Network Solution Componentsincluding, but
`
`not limited to, the vSmart Cloud-based SD-WANController, the vVManage Network Management
`
`System and vEdge Routers (“Accused Instrumentalities”).
`
`14. Asillustrated on Viptela’s website, the Accused Instrumentalities are configured to
`
`select and transmit data among disparate parallel networks, including MPLS, Internet and 4G/LTE
`
`networks:
`
`-3-
`
`Viptela, Inc. - Exhibit 1008
`Page 3
`
`Viptela, Inc. - Exhibit 1008
`Page 3
`
`

`

`
` vManage i]
`i)
`
`vSmart Controllers
`Software on x86
`
` ee43—_3Edge Routers
`ATA-CENTERS
`AMPU
`
`See http://viptela.com/solutions/overview/.
`
`15. “Customers place Viptela’s hardware appliance, the vEdgerouter, at each end point
`
`that needs connectivity .... The appliance then merges these connections and applies customer
`
`policies to the traffic.” http://www.informationweek.com/interop/startup-profile-viptela-targets-
`
`wan-cost-complexity/a/d-id/1317794. The policies are configured, managed and applied using the
`
`vSmart Cloud-based SDN-WANController and the vVManage Network Management System. The
`
`“vSmart Cloud-based SDN-WANController is the brain of the Viptela solution and centrally
`
`manages routing, policy, security, segmentation, and authentication of all devices on the overlay
`
`network.” http://viptela.com/solutions/overview/. The “vManage Network Management System
`
`(NMS)enables centralized configuration and management of the Viptela Secure Extensible
`
`Network solution and provides a real-time dashboard on the health of the network.” Jd. Through
`
`these products and services, Viptela offers “any-to-any connectivity with features such as
`
`application aware routing, service chaining, virtual Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) and weighted
`
`-4-
`
`Viptela, Inc. - Exhibit 1008
`Page 4
`
`Viptela, Inc. - Exhibit 1008
`Page 4
`
`

`

`Equal
`
`Cost
`
`Multipath
`
`(ECMP)
`
`operating
`
`on different
`
`transports.”
`
`http://viptela.com/2015/05/viptela-software-defined-wan-sd-wan/.
`
`16. Upon information and belief, in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), Viptela has
`
`induced and continues to induce others (e.g., Viptela’s customers, distributors, partners and/or
`
`third parties) to infringe,literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, the ’235 Patent by providing
`
`instructions via its website, or through other documents that induce others to directly infringe at
`
`least claim 5 of the ’235 Patent.
`
`17. Viptela induces its customers to infringe the ’235 Patent by, for example and
`
`without limitation, actively promoting the use of the Accused Instrumentalities to perform the
`
`claimed systems and methods. As described above, Viptela’s website illustrates that its Secure
`
`Extensible Network Solution is to be configured to transmit data packets in parallel across MPLS,
`
` Internet and 4G/LTEnetworks. See http://viptela.com/solutions/overview/. A presentation made
`
`by Viptela to the Open Network User Group similarly promotes the use of Viptela’s products and
`
`systems to transmit data packets in parallel across multiple network paths:
`
`
`— Ce vEdge
`S\fe8 _@ia
`a ‘ 7 MPLS
`\
`DataCenterA
`Internet Xx\. vEdge
` Data Center B
`ee @_ixa
`
`Router
`
`IxChariot
`
`|
`
`ZTP & Viptela control
`
`Control and Policy
`Elements,
`Programmatic APIs
`
`-5-
`
`Viptela, Inc. - Exhibit 1008
`Page 5
`
`Viptela, Inc. - Exhibit 1008
`Page 5
`
`

`

`Protecting Critical Applications With SD-WAN
`
`aie Eyerses
`GEO/O
`
`GEO/1
`
`Jom
`
`
`— 12D amp O22
`
`ont)
`
`
`)
`
`= Internet service is impaired
`
`= Low priority traffic is automatically
`
`rerouted over MPLS, only if enough
`
`bandwidth is available
`
` aoa
`o3—=>= Pe
`Internet
`
`Voice CRM Blaheay
`
`Low Priority
`Apps
`
`vEdge
`11
`
`ser ail,
`eee
`Open Networking
`
`Viptela control
`Centralized Policy
`Copyright 2015 Open Metworking User Group. All Rights Reserved Confidential Not For Distribution
`
`http://opennetworkingusereroup.com/downloads/ONUG S2015 slides/SD-
`
`WAN%20Verification%:20Slides.pdf.
`
`18. Upon information and belief, Viptela contributorily infringes at least claim 5 of the
`
`”235 Patent becauseit sells, imports, or offers to sell components of infringing products, including,
`
`for example, components of the Accused Instrumentalities, that constitute a material part of the
`
`invention of the ’235 Patent, knowing the components to be especially made or especially adapted
`
`for use in an infringementof the ’235 Patent, and knowing the componentsare notastaple article
`
`or commodity of commercesuitable for substantial noninfringing use.
`
`19. Viptela’s infringement of the ’235 Patent is without consent of, authority of, or
`
`license from FatPipe.
`
`COUNTII - INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO.7,406,048
`
`20. The allegations set forth in the foregoing paragraphs 1
`
`through 19 are hereby
`
`realleged and incorporated herein by reference.
`
`21. Upon information andbelief, in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), Viptela has directly
`
`infringed and continues to directly infringe,literally or under the doctrine of equivalents,at least
`
`claim 1 of the ’048 Patent by making, using, offering for sale, selling, or importing devices or
`
`-6-
`
`Viptela, Inc. - Exhibit 1008
`Page 6
`
`Viptela, Inc. - Exhibit 1008
`Page 6
`
`

`

`systems,
`
`in this judicial district and elsewhere in the United States (directly or through
`
`intermediaries), that, alone or in combination with other devices and/or systems, provide a
`
`controller having (i) a site interface connecting the controller to a site; (ii) at least two network
`
`interfaces that send packets toward the disparate networks; and (iii) a packet path selector that
`
`selects between network interfaces, using at least two known location address ranges which are
`
`respectively associated with disparate networks, according to at least: a destination of the packet,
`
`an optional presence ofalternate paths to that destination, and at least one specified criterion for
`
`selecting between alternate paths when such alternate paths are present; wherein the controller
`
`receives a packet throughthe site interface and sendsthe packet through the networkinterface that
`
`wasselected by the packet path selector.
`
`22. Viptela’s infringing products and services include, without limitation, Viptela’s
`
`SD-WANSystem and associated Secure Extensible Network Solution Componentsincluding, but
`
`not limited to, the vSmart Cloud-based SD-WAN Controller, the VManage Network Management
`
`System and vEdge Routers.
`
`23. Asillustrated on Viptela’s website, the Accused Instrumentalities are configured to
`
`select and transmit data amongdisparate parallel networks, including MPLS, Internet, and 4G/LTE
`
`networks:
`
`-7-
`
`Viptela, Inc. - Exhibit 1008
`Page 7
`
`Viptela, Inc. - Exhibit 1008
`Page 7
`
`

`

`
` vManage i]
`i)
`
`vSmart Controllers
`Software on x86
`
` ee43—_3Edge Routers
`ATA-CENTERS
`AMPU
`
`See http://viptela.com/solutions/overview/.
`
`24. “Customers place Viptela’s hardware appliance, the vEdgerouter, at each end point
`
`that needs connectivity .... The appliance then merges these connections and applies customer
`
`policies to the traffic.” http://www.informationweek.com/interop/startup-profile-viptela-targets-
`
`wan-cost-complexity/a/d-id/1317794. The policies are configured, managed, and applied using
`
`the vSmart Cloud-based SDN-WANController and the VManage Network Management System.
`
`The “vSmart Cloud-based SDN-WANController is the brain of the Viptela solution and centrally
`
`manages routing, policy, security, segmentation, and authentication of all devices on the overlay
`
`network.” http://viptela.com/solutions/overview/. The “vManage Network Management System
`
`(NMS)enables centralized configuration and management of the Viptela Secure Extensible
`
`Network solution and provides a real-time dashboard on the health of the network.” Jd. Through
`
`these products and services, Viptela offers “any-to-any connectivity with features such as
`
`application aware routing, service chaining, virtual Demilitarized Zone (DMZ), and weighted
`
`-8-
`
`Viptela, Inc. - Exhibit 1008
`Page 8
`
`Viptela, Inc. - Exhibit 1008
`Page 8
`
`

`

`Equal
`
`Cost
`
`Multipath
`
`(ECMP)
`
`operating
`
`on different
`
`transports.”
`
`http://viptela.com/2015/05/viptela-software-defined-wan-sd-wan/.
`
`25. Upon information and belief, in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), Viptela has
`
`induced and continues to induce others (e.g., Viptela’s customers, distributors, partners, and/or
`
`third parties) to infringe, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, the ’048 Patent by providing
`
`instructions via its website or through other documents that induce others to directly infringe at
`
`least claim 1 of the ’048 Patent.
`
`26. Viptela induces its customers to infringe the 048 Patent by, for example and
`
`without limitation, actively promoting the use of the Accused Instrumentalities to perform the
`
`claimed systems and methods. As described above, Viptela’s website illustrates that its Secure
`
`Extensible Network Solution is to be configured to transmit data packets in parallel across MPLS,
`
` Internet, and 4G/LTE networks. See http://viptela.com/solutions/overview/. A presentation made
`
`by Viptela to the Open Network User Group similarly promotes the use of Viptela’s products and
`
`systems to transmit data packets in parallel across multiple network paths:
`
`
`— Ce vEdge
`S\fe8 _@ia
`a ‘ 7 MPLS
`\
`DataCenterA
`Internet Xx\. vEdge
` Data Center B
`ee @_ixa
`
`Router
`
`IxChariot
`
`|
`
`ZTP & Viptela control
`
`Control and Policy
`Elements,
`Programmatic APIs
`
`-9-
`
`Viptela, Inc. - Exhibit 1008
`Page 9
`
`Viptela, Inc. - Exhibit 1008
`Page 9
`
`

`

`Protecting Critical Applications With SD-WAN
`
`aie Eyerses
`GEO/O
`
`= Internet service is impaired
`
`GEO/1
`
`= Low priority traffic is automatically
`yoo)
`Jom
`
`22 pO rerouted over MPLS, only if enough
`Jal
`zeal )
`bandwidth is available
`
`
` 3
` s
`s
`es
`
`7
`Ez
`
`Voice 3 Apps
`c»Ta
`= fied
`paar
`Low Priority
`
`wedge aoa1
`
`High Priority
`
`
` Apps
`
`Sry gi,
`eee
`
`Viptela control
`Centralized Policy
`Copyright 2015 Open Metworking User Group. All Rights Reserved Confidential Not For Distribution
`
`http://opennetworkingusereroup.com/downloads/ONUG S2015 slides/SD-
`
`WAN%20Verification%:20Slides.pdf.
`
`27. Upon information and belief, Viptela contributorily infringes at least claim 1 of the
`
`’048 Patent becauseit sells, imports, or offers to sell components of infringing products, including,
`
`for example, components of the Accused Instrumentalities, that constitute a material part of the
`
`invention of the ’048 Patent, knowing the components to be especially made or especially adapted
`
`for use in an infringement of the ’048 Patent and knowing the componentsare nota staple article
`
`or commodity of commercesuitable for substantial noninfringing use.
`
`28. Viptela’s infringement of the ’048 Patent is without consent of, authority of, or
`
`license from FatPipe.
`
`JURY DEMAND
`
`FatPipe hereby requestsa trial by jury pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil
`
`Procedure.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`FatPipe respectfully requests that the Court find in its favor and against Viptela, and
`
`that the Court grant FatPipe the followingrelief:
`
`-10-
`
`Viptela, Inc. - Exhibit 1008
`Page 10
`
`Viptela, Inc. - Exhibit 1008
`Page 10
`
`

`

`A. ajudgmentthat Viptela has infringed, directly or indirectly, the ’235 Patent and/or
`
`048 Patent;
`
`B.
`
`injunctive relief enjoining Viptela, its officers, agents, servants, employees and
`
`attorneys, and all other persons in active concert or participation with it from (i) making, using,
`
`selling, offering to sell, importing, and/or exporting a productor service that falls within the scope
`
`of the claims of the ’235 Patent and/or ’048 Patent, (ii) inducing others to infringe the ’235 Patent
`
`and/or ’048 Patent, or (111) engaging in any acts constituting contributory infringement of any
`
`claimsof the 235 Patent and/or ’048 Patent;
`
`C. ajudgmentandorder requiring Viptela to pay FatPipe its damages, costs, expenses,
`
`and pre-judgmentand post-judgmentinterest for Viptela’s infringement of the ’235 Patent and/or
`
`°048 Patent as provided under 35 U.S.C. § 284;
`
`D. an award to FatPipe for enhanced damagesas provided under 35 U.S.C. § 284;
`
`E. any andall otherrelief at law or in equity as the Court deemsjust and proper.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`By:
`
`Timothy J. Carroll
`Steven M. Lubezny
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`131 S. Dearborn Street
`Suite 1700
`Chicago, IL 60603
`Tel: 312-324-8400
`tcarroll@perkinscoie.com
`slubezny@perkinscoie.com
`
`Dated: March 22, 2016
`1219397 /43014
`
`_/s/David E. Moore
`David E. Moore (#3983)
`Bindu A. Palapura (#5370)
`Stephanie E. O’Byrne (#4446)
`Hercules Plaza, 6" Floor
`1313 N. Market Street
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`Tel: (302) 984-6000
`dmoore@potteranderson.com
`bpalapura@potteranderson.com
`sobyrne@potteranderson.com
`
`Attorneysfor PlaintiffFatPipe, Inc.
`
`-11-
`
`Viptela, Inc. - Exhibit 1008
`Page 11
`
`Viptela, Inc. - Exhibit 1008
`Page 11
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket