throbber
Supplied by the British Library 29 Mar 2018, 18:37 (BST)
`
`
`
`1 of 10
`
`Celltrion, Inc. 1039
`Celltrion v. Genentech
`IPR2017-01122
`
`

`

`Paclitaxel and Recombinant Human Granulocyte
`Colony-Stimulating Factor as Initial Chemotherapy
`for Metastatic Breast Cancer
`
`By Bonnie S. Reichman, Andrew 0. Seidman, John P.A. Crown, Robert Heelan, Thomas B. Hakes, David E. Lebwohl,
`Theresa A. Gilewski, Antonella Surbone, Violante Currie, Clifford A. Hudis, T.J. Yao, Raymond Klecker,
`Carlos Jamis-Dow, Jerry Collins, Susan Quinlivan, Regina Berkery, Frieda Toomosi, Renzo Canetta,
`Jason Fisherman, Suson Arbuck, and Lorry Norton
`
`Purpose: A phase II study of Taxol (padltaxel; Bristol(cid:173)
`Myers Squibb Co, Princeton, NJ) os Initial chemotherapy
`for metastatic breast cancer was cond1Kted. Recombi(cid:173)
`nant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG(cid:173)
`CSf) was used to ameliorate myelosuppresslon, the an(cid:173)
`ticipated dose-limiting toxicity.
`Patients and Methods : Twenty-eight patients w ith
`bidlmensionally measurable breast cancer who had not
`received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease
`w ere tr.oted. Taxol was administered at 250 mg/m3 as
`a continuous 24-hour Intravenous (IV) Infusion every 21
`days. rhG-CSF was administered at 5 µg/ kg/ d subcu(cid:173)
`taneously on days 3 through 1 O.
`Results: Objective responses were observed In 16 of
`26 assessable patients (62%; 95% confidence Interval,
`41% to 80%). There were three (12%) complete re(cid:173)
`sponses (CRs) and 13 (50%) partial responses (PRs). Ten
`of 16 patients (63%) who had received prior adjuvant
`chemotherapy responded, which included one CR and
`four PRs among eight patients who had received prior
`doxorublcln-containlng therapy. Responses were ob(cid:173)
`served In all sites of metastatic d isease. The median time
`to first objective response was 5 weeks (range, 1 to 14).
`
`Administration of r+.G-CSF was associated with a short
`duration of neutropenla (median, 2 days with absolute
`neutrophll count < 500 cells/µL). Eight of 26 patients
`(31 % ) who received more than one course re<eived sub(cid:173)
`sequent therapy without dose reduction. One hundred
`seventy-eight cycles of treatment were administered,
`with a median of six cycles per patient (range, one ta
`19). Eight courses (4.5o/o) were associated with admis(cid:173)
`sions for neutropenlc fever. Twenty-two patients (79%)
`did not r6qulre admission for neuft'openlt f•ver. Treat(cid:173)
`ment was well tolerated. Adverse effecta Included gen(cid:173)
`erallJ:ed alopecla In all patients. Myalgias, arthralglas,
`and peripheral neuropathy were mild. No hypersensi(cid:173)
`tivity reactions and no cardiac toxicity were observed.
`Conclusion: Taxol Is highly active as Initial chemo·
`therapy for metastatic breast cancer. Administration of
`rhG-CSF red1Ked the Incidence, depth, and duration of
`neutropenia, compared with published prior ex perience.
`Further studies of Taxol In breast cancer, Including com(cid:173)
`binations with other active agents, are clearly war(cid:173)
`ranted.
`J Clin Oncol J J: J 943- J 95 J • © 1993 by American So(cid:173)
`ciety of Cllnlcol Oncology.
`
`T HE NOVEL DITERPENE Taxol (paclitaxel; Bristol(cid:173)
`
`Myers Squibb Co, Princeton, NJ), derived from the
`bark of the western yew, Taxus brevifolia, is one of the
`most exciting new anticancer drugs. 1
`2 Unlike other mi(cid:173)
`•
`crotubule toxins in clinical use, such as vincristine or col(cid:173)
`chicine, Taxol promotes the formation oftubulin dimers
`and stabilizes microtubules against depolymerization.H
`This results in growth inhibition and loss of cell viability.
`In the 1960s, bark extracts containing Taxol were found
`to be active against many murine cancers, including
`LI 210, P388, and P 1534 leukemias, Walker 256 carci(cid:173)
`nosarcoma, sarcoma 180, and Lewis lung carcinoma.7
`Taxol was isolated in 1971 . However, because of its limited
`supply and relative insolubility, and a preclinical testing
`profile that was not very different from other spindle poi(cid:173)
`sons, clinical trials with the drug were not initiated until
`the early 1980s. Phase I studies found that profound my(cid:173)
`elosuppression, specifically noncumulative reversible
`neutropenia, was dose-limiting. 8•12 Life-threatening type
`1 hypersensitivity reactions were also encountered. These
`may be at least partially the result of the infusion of a
`high concentration of Cremophor EL (BASF Aktienge-
`
`sellschaft), a mixture of polyoxyethylated castor oil and
`ethanol, used to solubilize the Taxol. In fact, similar hy(cid:173)
`persensitivity reactions have occurred when Cremophor
`EL was infused with drugs other than Taxol, such as di(cid:173)
`demnin B or teniposide. 1
`) Increasing the duration of the
`infusion to 24 hours and administering dexamethasone
`and H 1 and H2 receptor antagonists before Taxol suc(cid:173)
`cessfully reduces the incidence of hypersensitivity reac-
`
`From the Breast and Gynecological Ca11cer Medicine Service. Di(cid:173)
`vision of Solid Tumor Oncology, Depar1ment of Medicine, and De·
`partments of Medical Imagi11g and Epidemiology and Biostatistics.
`Memorial Sloan·Keuering Cancer Cemer, New York, NY: Food and
`Dmg Administration, Divisio11 of Clinical Phannacology, Rockville;
`National Cancer 1nsti111te, Division of Cancer Therapy, Cancer Ther(cid:173)
`apy Evaluation Program. Bethesda. MD; and Bristol-Myers Squibb,
`Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Wallingford, CT.
`Submitted November 24. 1992: accepted May 26. 1993.
`Supported in part by National Cancer Institute. Bethesda. MD.
`grants no. CA-09207-14 and 1-CM073/J.
`Address reprin.t requests to Bonnie S. Reichman, MD, Slrang-Cor(cid:173)
`nel/ Breast Center, 428 E 72 St. New York. NY 10021.
`© 1993 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
`0732-183X/93/1110-0017$3.00/0
`
`Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 11, No 10 (October), 1993: pp 1943-1951
`
`1943
`
`Downloaded from ascopubs.org by INFOTRIEVE on March 2, 2018 from 216.033.062.017
`Copyright © 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved.
`
`
`
`2 of 10
`
`Celltrion, Inc. 1039
`Celltrion v. Genentech
`IPR2017-01122
`
`

`

`1944
`
`REICHMAN ET Al
`
`tions.6- 12 Phase I trials of this method of administration
`have concluded that phase II studies should use 135 to
`, depending on the degree of the patient's prior
`250 mg/m2
`exposure to cytotoxic therapy. In these phase I trials,
`significant anticancer activity was observed in ovarian
`carcinoma, non-small-cell lung carcinoma, and mela(cid:173)
`noma. 6-12
`Concerning breast cancer, Taxol is active against the
`implanted human MX-1 mammary tumor xenograft.7 In
`a recent phase II trial in metastatic breast cancer, the
`overall response rate was 56% (95% confidence interval,
`35% to 76%), including a 12% complete response (CR)
`rate.14 Hematopoietic growth factors were not used in this
`study, and myelosuppression was dose-limiting. For this
`reason, we performed the present trial in which recom(cid:173)
`binant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG(cid:173)
`CSF) was administered to ameliorate neutropenia and its
`morbid consequences.
`
`PATIENTS AND METHODS
`
`Eligibility Criteria
`To be eligible for our trial, patients had to have histologically con(cid:173)
`firmed breast cancer with clinical evidence of biclimensionally mea(cid:173)
`surable metastatic clisease. Previous cytotoxic chemotherapy for stage
`IV clisease was not permitted. Patients may have received prior ra(cid:173)
`diation therapy if it was completed ~ 4 weeks before study entry and
`if the portals encompassed less than 30% of the marrow-bearing skel(cid:173)
`eton. Indicator lesion(s) could not have been irradiated previously.
`Patients could have received prior adjuvant chemotherapy if it was
`completed l year or longer before study entry. One hormonal agent
`as adjuvant treatment and/or one hormone therapy for metastatic
`disease were allowed, but hormone therapy must have been cliscon(cid:173)
`tinued at least 3 weeks before protocol entry. Blastic bone metastases,
`bone scan abnormalities alone, and pleural or peritoneal effusions
`were not considered measurable. Lytic bone metastases were ac(cid:173)
`ceptable as measurable indicator lesions if they were bidimensionally
`measurable on plain radiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI),
`or computed tomographic (CT) scan. Patients with stable brain me(cid:173)
`tastases were eligible if at least one other site of measurable disease
`existed. Patients with carcinomatous meningitis and/or symptomatic
`lymphangitic pulmonary metastases were ineligible. Other eligibility
`criteria included the following: total WBC count more than 3,000
`cells/µL, absolute granulocyte count ~ 1,500 cells/µL, hemoglobin
`~ 8 g/dL, platelet count 2: 100,000 cells/µL, serum creatinine s 1.4
`mg/dL, total bilirubin less than 1.5 mg/dL, serum calcium s 10.5
`mg/dL, Kamofsky perfonnance status ~ 60%, and an anticipated
`survival duration of~ 12 weeks. Patients must have recovered from
`prior surgery, being ~ 2 weeks from minor surgery and ~ 3 weeks
`from major surgery. Patients were ineligible if they had other prior
`malignancy (except for in situ cervical carcinoma and cured non(cid:173)
`melanoma skin cancer), other serious medical illnesses (including
`significant cardiac disease or arrhythmia), peripheral neuropathy, se(cid:173)
`vere infection, or malnutrition. Before study entry, all patients gave
`written informed consent indicating their awareness of the investi(cid:173)
`gational nature of this protocol.
`
`Treatment Plan
`Taxol was supplied by the National Cancer Institute as a concen(cid:173)
`trated sterile solution for i.ntravenous (IV) administration in a 5-mL
`vial containing 30 mg of Taxol in polyoxyethylated castor oil (Cre(cid:173)
`mophor EL) 50% and dehydrated alcohol, United States Pharma(cid:173)
`copeia, 50%. The drug was cliluted with either 5% dextrose injection
`or 0.9% sodium chloride injection. When tbe study was initiated,
`shelf-life stability studies had indicated that the solution was stable
`for at least 12 hours, so the total dose was divided into two consecutive
`12-hour infusions, each prepared immediately before administration. 7
`Subsequent studies demonstrated that the solution was stable for 24
`hours, so the total daily dose was prepared just before the start of
`therapy. 15 In-line filters, 0.2 µm, were used (IVEX-2, Abbott Labo(cid:173)
`ratories, North Chicago, IL). Only glass containers and polyethylene(cid:173)
`lined nitroglycerin tubing were used to avoid leaching of polyvinyl
`chloride from containers made of this material.
`Initial dosage ofTaxol was 250 mg/m1, administered as a contin(cid:173)
`uous IV infusion over 24 hours. Treatment was planned to be repeated
`every 21 days. Subsequent doses were modified on the basis of he(cid:173)
`matologic and nonhematologic toxicities (using National Cancer In(cid:173)
`stitute common toxicity criteria) listed in Table 1.16 The dose was
`reduced by one level to 200 mg/m1 if the granulocyte nadir was less
`than 250 cells/µL or ifthe platelet naclir was s 50,000 cells/µL, and
`by two levels to 180 mg/m2 if infection or bleeding occurred in as(cid:173)
`sociation with marrow suppression. Subsequent dose reductions fol(cid:173)
`lowed the same rules. In patients without dose-limiting toxicity, the
`dose was escalated by two levels to 300 mg/m1 if the granulocyte
`nadir was more than 2,000 cells/µL and the platelet nadir was more
`
`Tobie 1. Dose Modiffcotion Scheme
`
`level
`
`- 2
`- 1
`0
`I
`2
`
`o.rM'lition of Dose levels
`
`Oose (mg/m'l
`
`180
`200
`250
`275
`300
`
`Hemotolog~< T oxiclty
`
`Gronulocyle Nadir
`
`Platelet Nodlr
`
`Dow ModifkotH>n
`
`> 2,000
`> 1,000 but s 2,000
`
`;,_ 250 but s 1,000
`
`<250
`Infection or bleeding
`
`ond > 100,000
`and/or> 75,000 but
`s 100.000
`or > 50,0-00 but s
`75,000
`ors 50,0-00
`
`Increase 2 levels
`Increase I level
`
`No change
`
`Decrease I level
`Decrease 2 levels
`
`Not1hemotolo9ic T oxidty
`
`Grado
`
`0-1
`
`2
`3
`
`4
`
`Oose ModiAcotion
`
`Increase 1
`level
`No change
`Decrease 1
`level
`Decrease 2
`levels
`
`Downloaded from ascopubs.org by INFOTRIEVE on March 2, 2018 from 216.033.062.017
`Copyright © 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved.
`
`
`
`3 of 10
`
`Celltrion, Inc. 1039
`Celltrion v. Genentech
`IPR2017-01122
`
`

`

`PACLITAXEL AND rhG-CSF IN METASTATIC BREAST CANCER
`
`1945
`
`than 100,000 cells/µL, and by one level to 275 mg/m2 if the granu(cid:173)
`locyte nadir was more than 1,000 but less than 2000 ceUs/µL and/
`or the platelet nadir was more than 75,000 but less than 100,000
`cells/µL.
`When appropriate, re-treatment was to be held beyond day 22
`until hematologic recovery to a granulocyte count 2: 1,500 cells/µL
`and platelets more than 100,000 cells/µL, and until gastrointestinal
`and/or infectious complications resolved. We planned to take patients
`off study if they did not rcoover sufficiently to receive treatment within
`35 days from their prior dosage. Subcutaneous ports were implanted
`in patients with poor peripheral venous access before beginning ther(cid:173)
`apy. All patients received the following regimen to prevent hyper(cid:173)
`sensitivity reactions: dexamethasone 20 mg orally at 14 and 7 hours
`before each Taxol treatment, and diphenhydramine hydrochloride
`50 mg, and cimetidine 300 mg IV at I hour before Taxol. During
`the first 30 minutes ofTaxol infusion, a physician or a chemotherapy
`nurse remained at the bedside. Blood pressure was monitored every
`15 minutes during the first hour of the infusion.
`rhG-CSF (Neupogen, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA) at 5 ,..gfkg/d
`was specified to be administered subcutaneously on days 3 through
`10 of each course (a total of 8 days) or until the absolute neutrophil
`count recovered to 2: 2000 cells/ µL for 3 consecutive days, even if
`antibiotic treatment for febrile neutropcnia was required. Treatment
`with rhG-CSF was discontinued if the absolute neutrophil count ex(cid:173)
`ceeded 10,000 cells/µL. rhG-CSF was discontinued for at least 48
`hours before institution of the next cycle ofTaxol.
`
`Duration of Therapy
`After the initial dose of Taxol, we planned to administer at least
`one additional treatment unless there was disease progression or if
`intolerable (grade 3 to 4) toxicity, excluding neutropenia, precluded
`further treatment. Due to the limited supply of Taxol, we planned
`to administer only two courses beyond the best observed response,
`or to stop treatment when a maximum of 10 cycles were given, unless
`the tumor was still regressing at 10 cycles.
`
`Pretreatment EvaluaJion
`A complete history and physical examination were performed be(cid:173)
`fore the first cycle of therapy. Laboratory studies included a complete
`blood cell (CBC) count with differential and platelet count, biochem(cid:173)
`ical screening profile, serum creatinine, carcinoembryonic antigen
`(CEA) and CA 15-3 determinations, serum human chorionic gonad(cid:173)
`otropin-beta (if indicated to rule out pregnancy), ECG, and postero(cid:173)
`anterior (PA) and lateral chest x-rays. CT scan, MRI, and ultrasound
`were performed as needed to evaluate bidimensionally measurable
`disease. Bone scans were to be performed if clinically warranted.
`
`Eva/UaJion During Treatment
`During treatment, CBC with differential and platelet counts were
`performed three times per week (each Monday, Wednesday, and
`Friday) to measure the duration and depth of neutropenia, and to
`monitor the effect of rhG-CSF. Before each treatment course, a phys(cid:173)
`ical examination and a detailed history documenting disease symp(cid:173)
`toms and the side effects of t.reatmenl was obtained. In addition,
`biochemical screening profile, scrum creatinine, CEA, CA 15-3, ECG,
`and PA and lateral chest x-rays were performed every 3 weeks just
`before each treatment course. Tumor measurements were required
`at each cycle if these could be obtained by physical examination or
`chest x-ray. Otherwise, the measurements were to be obtained every
`
`6 weeks (every two cycles) by CT, MRI. ultrasound, or plain x-ray
`(guided, if necessary, by bone scan}. Patients with cutaneous lesions
`were to have serial photographic documentation whenever possible.
`
`Criteria for Response
`CR was defined as the disappea ranee of all clinical evidence of
`active tumor, with complete reossification of bone lesions and absence
`or disease-related symptoms for a minimum of 4 weeks. Partial re(cid:173)
`sponse (PR) was defined as a :.:. 50% reduction in the sum of the
`products of the biperpendicular diameters of all measurable lesions,
`without the appearance of new lesions for at least 4 weeks. When
`there were multiple sites of metastases, the largest masses (up to five)
`were considered as the index lesions. Minor response (MR) was de(cid:173)
`fined as a decrease of less than 50% but more than 25% in tumor
`size for at least 4 weeks. Stable disease (SD) was defined as no change
`in tumor size or a less than 25% increase for at least 4 weeks. Pro(cid:173)
`gressive disease (PD) was defined as the unequivocal appearance of
`any new lesions or an increase of~ 25% in the sum of the perpen(cid:173)
`dicular diameters of any measured lesion or in the estimated size of
`a nonmeasurable lesion. MR, SD, and PD were considered to be
`treatment failures.
`
`Pharmacokinetic Studies
`During the initial treatment cycle, three venous samples were col(cid:173)
`lected from each patient: one before Taxol and two during the last
`2 hours of the infusion (between hours 22 and 23) with at least 30
`minutes separating these final two samples. At each sampling, 7 to
`10 mL of blood was collected in a heparinized tube. This was cen(cid:173)
`trifuged to separate the plasma, which was then transferred to a conical
`1 S-mL polypropylene screw-top tube and stored at - 20°C. An aliquot
`of the infusate from each patient was also stored at -20°C.
`Taxol levels in plasma samples were measured by a reverse-phase
`high-performance high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)
`method described by Jamis-Dow et al.11 Briefly, cepbalomannine
`was added as an internal standard to 0.5 mL of plasma standard or
`sample. Each sample or standard was extracted on a C11 solid-phase
`extraction column. The extracts were dried under vacuum, recon(cid:173)
`stituted in mobile phase, and resolved by HPLC. Samples were chro(cid:173)
`matographed isocratically, with 45% acetonitrile in water at a flow
`rate of I mL/min. Separation was accomplished on an octadecylsilane
`(ODS) Hypersyl C18, 5 µmol/L, 100 X 4.6-mm column (Hewlett(cid:173)
`Packard Co, Palo Alto, CA) with a C11 prccolumn insert (Millipore
`Corp, Milford, MA). Taxol and ccphalomannine were quantitated
`at 230 nm with peak confirmation by diode-array detection.
`
`StaJisticaJ Methods
`The two-stage phase ll design reported by Geban11 was applied
`for this study. Therapeutic responses were seen in the first 14 patients,
`so accrual was extended to estimate the response rate better. Duration
`of response and survival determinations were measured from the
`date of initiation ofTaxol.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Patients
`Between April 8 and October 24, 1991, 28 patients
`were accrued to this study (Table 2). The median age
`was 52 years (range, 30 to 67) and the median Karnofsky
`performance status was good at 90% (range, 70% to
`
`Downloaded from ascopubs.org by INFOTRIEVE on March 2, 2018 from 216.033.062.017
`Copyright © 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved.
`
`
`
`4 of 10
`
`Celltrion, Inc. 1039
`Celltrion v. Genentech
`IPR2017-01122
`
`

`

`1946
`
`Tobie 2. Patient Characteristics
`
`Chorocteri$1i(
`
`No. entered
`No. assessable
`Age, years
`Median
`Range
`Karnofsky performance status (%)
`Median
`Range
`Menopausal status
`Pre-
`Post-
`Sites of metastatic disease
`Bone
`lung
`liver
`lymph nodes
`Soft tiuue
`No. of metastatic disease sites
`l
`2
`;,:. 3
`Prior theropy
`No prior adjuvant chemotherapy
`Prior odjuvont chemotherapy
`CMF
`CMFVP
`CAF
`CAMF
`CAMFV
`Prior hormonal therapy
`Adjuvont only
`Metastatic only
`Both
`Time from prior adjvvant therapy
`to study entry, months
`Medi on
`Ronge
`
`No.
`
`28
`26
`
`52
`30-67
`
`90
`70- 100
`
`9
`19
`
`17
`10
`11
`16
`14
`
`5
`12
`11
`
`ll
`17
`8
`l
`6
`
`l
`II
`s
`2
`4
`
`20
`12- 47
`
`32
`68
`
`54
`36
`39
`57
`4Q
`
`18
`43
`39
`
`39
`61
`
`39
`
`Abbreviotions, C, cyclophosphomide; M, methotrexote; F, ffuorouracil;
`V, vincristine; P, prednisone; A, doxorubicin.
`
`100%). However, 82% of patients had two or more sites
`of metastatic disease, and I 1 (39%) had at least three
`sites of metastatic disease. Seventeen patients (61 %) had
`received prior ad ju vant chemotherapy, with a . median
`time interval from completion of adjuvant chemotherapy
`to study entry of 20 months (range, 12 to 47). Eight pa(cid:173)
`tients had received doxorubicin-containing adjuvant
`chemotherapy, and nine had received cyclophospha(cid:173)
`mide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) variants.
`Two patients had received vincristine as part of the ad(cid:173)
`juvant chemotherapy regimen. Eleven patients (39%) had
`received hormonal therapy: five in the adjuvant setting,
`two for treatment of metastatic disease, and four for
`both.
`
`REICHMAN ET Al
`
`Therapeutic Responses
`Twenty-six of 28 patients entered were assessable for
`response. The other two patients were not assessable for
`response, but were evaluated for toxicity. One patient had
`received her first cycle of treatment when it became nec(cid:173)
`essary to administer radiation therapy for a cervical spine
`fracture, which became apparent only after a motor vehicle
`accident. The other patient had received two prior hor(cid:173)
`mone regimens as treatment for stage IV breast cancer,
`but this information was withheld at the time of study
`entry. This latter patient had stable disease after four cycles
`of treatment with Taxol.
`Objective responses were observed in 16 of 26 fully
`assessable patients (62%; 95% confidence interval, 41 % to
`80%) (Table 3). Three CRs ( 12%; 95% confidence interval,
`2% to 30%) were seen: one patient had complete resolution
`of supraclavicular lymphadenopatby and pleural effusion,
`another had disappearance of supraclavicular and cervical
`lymphadenopathy by physical examination and CT scan,
`and the third had disappearance of supraclavicular
`lymphadenopathy and histologically confirmed resolution
`of diffuse involvement of the skin of the anterior and pos(cid:173)
`terior chest wall. She had received adjuvant radiation to
`the anterior chest wall, as well as adjuvant doxorubicin(cid:173)
`containing chemotherapy. There were 13 PRs (50%; 95%
`confidence interval, 30% to 70%), which were observed
`in all sites of metastatic disease.
`Hormone receptor status did not appear to influence
`response. Although menopausal status per se did not in(cid:173)
`fluence the probability of response, responses were seen
`more frequently in women younger than 50 years of age
`(J 1 of 14 [79%) v five of 12 [42%), P = .105, two-sided
`Fisher's exact test). The median age of patients with re(cid:173)
`sponding tumors was 45.5 years (range, 30 to 67), as com(cid:173)
`pared with 55 years (range, 37 to 64) for patients whose
`tumors did not respond.
`Prior adjuvant treatment did not appear to influence
`response to Taxol (Table 4). Six PRs occurred in the 10
`patients who did not receive prior adjuvant chemotherapy.
`Ten of 16 patients (63%) who had received prior adjuvant
`
`Tobie 3. Therapeutic Response•
`
`Response
`
`CR
`PR
`CR + PR
`MR
`so
`PD
`
`No.of
`Potients
`
`3
`13
`16
`4
`0
`6
`
`Percent
`
`12
`50
`62
`
`95% Confl<lence
`Interval
`
`2-30
`30-70
`41 -80
`
`Note. N = 26 patients ossessoble for response .
`
`Downloaded from ascopubs.org by INFOTRIEVE on March 2, 2018 from 216.033.062.017
`Copyright © 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved.
`
`
`
`5 of 10
`
`Celltrion, Inc. 1039
`Celltrion v. Genentech
`IPR2017-01122
`
`

`

`PACLITAXEL AND rhG-CSF IN METASTATIC BREAST CANCER
`
`1947
`
`Table 4. Response by Prior Therapy (N • 26)
`
`Adjuvont Chemolh0topy
`(n • 16)
`
`Prk>r Regimen
`{no. of potients)
`
`2 CMF (n ; 7)
`1 CAF (n ; 8)
`2 CMF (n = 7)
`1 CMFVP (n • 11
`4 CAF (n = 8)
`1 CMF (n s 7)
`I CAF (n p 8)
`
`2 CMF (n • 71
`2 CAF (n ; 2)
`
`Response
`roloxol
`
`No.of
`Patients
`
`CR
`
`PR
`
`MR
`
`so
`PD
`
`3
`
`7
`
`2
`
`0
`4
`
`Overall Response Rote
`No.
`10/ 16
`63
`%
`
`No Adjuvont
`Chemother opy
`(n • 10)
`
`0
`
`6
`
`2
`
`0
`2
`
`6110
`60
`
`Abbreviations: C, cyclophosphamide; M, methotrexote; f , lluorourocll:
`V, vincris.tine; P. prednisone; A, doxorubicin.
`
`chemotherapy responded to Taxol. These included one
`CR and four PRs in patients who had previously received
`doxorubicin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy, and two
`CRs and three PRs in patients who had received adjuvant
`CMF, one of whom bad also received prior vincristine.
`Responses to Taxol were seen in six of 10 patients who
`had received prior hormone treatment: three of five who
`bad received adjuvant hormone treatment, and three of
`five who had received such treatment for advanced disease.
`The median time to first objective response (which is
`defined as the occurrence of a PR, even in patients even(cid:173)
`tually achieving a CR) was short at a median of 5 weeks
`(range, I to 14 ). Two of three patients whose tumors re(cid:173)
`sponded completely achieved their best response at 6
`weeks and 12 weeks. The third patient's skin disease, which
`had achieved a PR at 6 weeks, continued to resolve slowly
`and a pathologic CR was documented at 57 weeks. It is
`of note that this patient's dermal metastases were partially
`in a site of prior radiation therapy. Her supraclavicular
`lymphadenopathy had resolved completely by 3 weeks.
`Excluding this patient, the median time to best response
`was 6 weeks, with a range of I to 14 weeks.
`Due to the limited supply ofTaxol, it was necessary to
`remove patients from study when they had received two
`treatment cycles beyond their best response. Subsequent
`therapy was unspecified by the protocol, so response du(cid:173)
`ration and survival cannot be assessed.
`
`Toxicity
`ln general, treatment was well tolerated. The predom(cid:173)
`inant toxicity was hematologic, with a deep but brief
`
`granulocyte nadir. The first two patients who received
`treatment did not receive rhG-CSF with any of their treat(cid:173)
`ment cycles. Both patients had significant WBC nadirs
`(0.1 and 0.2 cells/µL), which lasted 7 and 8 days. One was
`hospitalized for 4 days for treatment offebrile neutropenia
`without a documented source. Both patients received ad(cid:173)
`ditional treatment at 200 mg/m2 without growth factor
`support: one received three cycles and the other seven
`cycles with no further significant toxicity.
`Because of these two cases and the depth and duration
`of neutropenia reported by investigators from the M.D.
`Anderson Hospital, all subsequent patients received rhG(cid:173)
`CSF. 14 One hundred seventy-eight cycles of treatment were
`administered, with a median of six cycles per patient
`(range, one to 19) (Table 5). Only one patient received
`one cycle at the escalated dose of 300 mg/m2
`; this was
`well tolerated, but treatment was discontinued because of
`PD. Dose reductions were necessary in the second cycle
`for 12 of26 patients. Subsequently, dose reductions were
`necessary for four patients in cycle no. 3, for three patients
`in cycle no. 4, for one patient in cycle no. 6, and for one
`patient in cycle no. I 0. Five patients had treatment re(cid:173)
`duced by two dose levels, but one of these patients had
`subsequent dose reescalation to 200 mg/m2
`, which was
`well tolerated. One patient had three sequential dose re(cid:173)
`ductions, with a final dose level of 160 mg/m2• This patient
`had a CR. Neutropenia was the reason for dose reduction
`in all but one patient, who received modified doses because
`of nausea and emesis. Of 178 cycles administered, there
`we.re eight admissions (4%) for treatment of febrile neu(cid:173)
`tropenia, involving six of 28 patients (21 % ). One patient
`was hospitalized for three episodes of neutropenic fever,
`
`Table 5. Extent of Administered Therapy
`
`No. of
`cycles
`
`28
`26
`25
`23
`17
`17
`11
`9
`6
`5
`3
`I
`178
`
`Cycle
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12- 19
`T otol cycle•
`No.
`%
`
`Dose (mg/m'l
`
`160
`
`180
`
`200
`
`250
`
`275
`
`300
`
`28
`13
`10
`8
`6
`6
`3
`
`11
`13
`11
`8
`8
`5
`5
`3
`2
`
`1
`2
`4i
`3
`3
`3
`3
`3
`2
`1
`8
`
`2
`
`33
`18.5
`
`67
`38
`
`75
`42
`
`0
`0
`
`1
`.5
`
`NOTE. Toto! of 178 patient cycle ..
`
`Downloaded from ascopubs.org by INFOTRIEVE on March 2, 2018 from 216.033.062.017
`Copyright © 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved.
`
`
`
`6 of 10
`
`Celltrion, Inc. 1039
`Celltrion v. Genentech
`IPR2017-01122
`
`

`

`1948
`
`only one of which was associated with a source (positive
`cultures of blood and urine). Treatment was never delayed
`for slow hematologic recovery. The two treatment delays
`observed were because of a mediport catheter infection
`and for a pericardia! effusion that required surgery.
`The degree of myelotoxicity associated with the first
`cycle of treatment (including the two patients who did
`not receive rhG-CSF) is listed in Table 6. More than half
`of our patients had neutrophil nadirs less than 500 cells/
`µL, and 25% bad WBC counts less than 1,000 cells/µL.
`Severe thrombocytopenia was seen in only one patient.
`With rhG-CSF, granulocyte nadirs occurred approxi(cid:173)
`mately 1 week after Taxol. The two patients who did not
`receive rhG-CSF experienced leukocyte nadirs at day 14
`and day 15. One of these patients had relatively prolonged
`myelosuppression of 8 days' duration. In the 16 patients
`who had grade 4 neutropenia, the median time to recovery
`to more than 500 granulocytes/µL was 3.5 days (range, 1
`to 8). Median nadir counts associated with subsequent
`treatment cycles are listed in Table 7.
`In the first cycle, only one patient required transfusions
`of platelets and packed RBCs. This patient required hos(cid:173)
`pitalization for neutropenic fever associated with oral and
`rectal bleeding, hematuria, mucositis, and disseminated
`intravascular coaguJopathy. In this case, extensive hepatic
`metastases were present at study entry, with more than
`50% liver involvement on CT scan, a bilirubin level of
`1.2 mg/dL, AST level of309 mg/dL, lactate dehydrogenase
`level of 429 mg/dL, and an alkaline phosphatase level of
`789 mg/dL. This patient had rapid progression of hepatic
`metastases after the first cycle of treatment.
`Generalized alopecia was universal and always occurred
`within the first three cycles of treatment. Mild peripheral
`sensory neuropathy ( < grade 2+) was seen in 79% of pa(cid:173)
`tients. No patient had disabling sensory or motor neu(cid:173)
`ropathy. Mild to moderate myalgias and arthralgias (grade
`I to 2+) were observed in all patients and were exacerbated
`during rhG-CSF administration. These symptoms were
`relieved with nonnarcotic analgesics in all but four pa(cid:173)
`tients. Nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, and mucositis were
`mild when reported. Only one patient (the patient with
`extensive liver metastases) required hospitalization for se(cid:173)
`vere mucositis and dehydration, but this was associated
`with concomitant pancytopenia and fever. Another pa(cid:173)
`tient was hospitalized for grade 3 nausea and vomiting,
`but this patient did not experience notable myelosup(cid:173)
`pression. She had progressive respiratory insufficiency and
`on further evaluation was found to have an enlarging
`pericardia! effusion. Drainage of the malignant effusion
`and placement of a subxiphoid pericardia! window re(cid:173)
`sulted in symptomatic improvement. She received two
`
`REICHMAN ET Al
`
`Table 6. Cycle No. 1 Myel otoxicity: CTEP Toxicity
`
`mG-CSF
`
`No rhG·CSF
`
`No.
`
`26
`
`5
`3
`5
`8
`5
`
`8
`
`l
`2
`14
`
`20
`5
`
`11
`6
`8
`
`No. of potients
`Toxicity (grodel
`WBC count
`0
`l
`2
`3
`4
`ANC
`0
`1
`2
`3
`4
`Plotelets
`0
`1
`2
`3
`4
`HGB
`0
`1
`2
`3
`4
`
`%
`
`19
`12
`19
`31
`19
`
`31
`4
`4
`8
`54
`
`77
`19
`
`4
`
`42
`23
`31
`
`4
`
`No.
`
`2
`
`%
`
`2
`
`100
`
`2
`
`2
`
`100
`
`100
`
`2
`
`100
`
`Abbreviations, CTEP, Cancer T reotment Evoluotion Progrom; ANC, ob·
`solute neutrophil count; HGB, hemoglobin.
`
`additional cycles at 200 mg/m2 without significant toxicity.
`She died of PD 26 days after treatment was discontinued.
`No significant hypersensitivity reactions were observed.
`No cardiac toxicity was encountered. No significant
`changes in vital signs during the infusion were observed
`either during the first hour, when they were monitored
`every 15 minutes, or subsequently, when they were mea(cid:173)
`sured at 8-hour intervals. Mild facial flushing was com(cid:173)
`mon, but this may have been due to the premedication
`wi

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket