throbber
CLIN CHEM 391 4852 1993
`
`Ionic Binding Net Charge and Donnan Effect of Human Serum Albumin as a
`Function of pH
`
`Niels FoghAndersen Poid Jannik Bjerrum and Ole SiggaardAndersen
`
`The ionic activities and total molalities of sodium potas
`sium calcium lithium and chloride in a solution of human
`serum albumin were measured at different values of pH
`between 4 and 9 The same quantities were measured
`simultaneously in a protein free electrolyte solution in
`membrane equilibrium with the albumin solution Taking
`liquid junction potential and bias from unse
`the residual
`lectivity of the electrodes into account we determined the
`own bound and net charges of albumin Chloride was
`low pH and calcium at high pH The
`amply bound at
`ions bound to albumin opposed the
`varying charge of
`effect of acid or base on the net charge All
`ions were
`distributed across the membrane according to the same
`electric potential difference which equalled the Donnan
`The high concordance
`between
`observation
`potential
`and theory favors the Donnan
`theory and furthermore
`implies that the electrodes are as accurate in a solution
`with albumin as in a protein free solution
`
`Addftlonal Keyphrases artificial kidney
`motic pressure
`ion selective electrodes
`ride
`lithium
`
`sodium
`
`potassium
`
`dialysis
`
`calcium
`
`colloid os
`chlo
`
`The colloid osmotic pressure of albumin in plasma
`balances
`the
`intravascular
`pressure
`hydrostatic
`thereby maintaining a normal plasma volume About
`half of the colloid osmotic pressure is due to the Donnan
`effect The permeable cations and anions are unevenly
`distributed intra and extravascularly according to the
`total molality
`mmolkg of water on the vascular side The contribu
`tion of the Donnan effect
`to the colloid osmotic pressure
`ircouoid is proportional to the squared molality of im
`to the
`permeable charge and inversely proportional
`molality of salt
`
`Donnan theory 1 with the larger
`
`irconoid = R T Kmaibumin
`
`Znet2Orneetn
`
`PH20 1
`
`where R is the gas constant T is the temperature
`is
`the osmotic coefficient m is molality Znet
`is the molality
`of impermeable albumin net charge and PH20 is the
`density of water
`The net charge of albumin is defined as its own charge
`plus the charge of all bound ions all of which depend on
`
`pH 2 pH and electrolyte disturbances are common in
`
`patients with abnormal plasma volume and albumin
`for example because of neonatal asphyxia hemorrhage
`shock nephrotic syndrome or lung edema so a study of
`
`Department of Clinical Chemistry Herlev Hospital DK2730
`Herlev Denmark
`Received June 29 1992 accepted August 21 1992
`
`48 CLINICAL CHEMISTRY Vol 39 No 1 1993
`
`the influence of pH on the net charge Donnan effect
`and ionic binding of albumin is clinically relevant
`Increasing the pH in a patient might be as effective for
`the colloid osmotic pressure as an albumin infusion
`Although plasma is the system used normally in
`is the interstitial
`fluid that consti
`clinical chemistry it
`tutes the actual environment of the cells and is regu
`Ion activity is not
`lated by homeostasis
`identical
`in
`fluid The Donnan effect and the
`plasma and interstitial
`factors affecting it should be known and taken into
`for the interpretation of electrolyte
`account
`results
`especially in patients with severe electrolyte pH or
`protein disturbances 3 The Donnan effect may also
`
`underlie the alkalosis of hypoproteinemia
`dosis of hyperproteinemia
`
`and the aci
`
`Materials and Methods
`The experimental setup is shown in Figure 1 We used
`an artificial kidney with a Cuprophan membrane Gam
`bro GF 120M Hollow Fiber Dialyzer with 13 m2 effec
`tive membrane area On the inner side of the mem
`brane was a 200 gL solution of human serum albumin
`for injection Nordisk Gentofte Denmark 05 L which
`had been dialyzed to remove its stabilizing caprylic acid
`The ratio of fatty acid to albumin was 1 The high
`concentration of albumin was chosen to give a high
`precision to the measurements but we must assume
`the association constants were unaffected We
`that
`concentrations of NaC1 KC1 and
`added physiological
`CaC12 plus LiC1 1 mmolL imidazole 1 mmolL and
`succinic acid 1 mmolL All reagents were analytical
`grade from Merck Darmstadt Germany The two buff
`ers were necessary to stabilize pH in the proteinfree
`the pH interval
`solutions and they were chosen to cover
`without binding calcium Extra CaCl2 was added to
`for the increased albumin binding of Ca2+
`compensate
`with increasing pH Bicarbonate was not included here
`because Pc02 could not be controlled and because bicar
`bonate interferes with the chloride electrode On the
`outer side of the membrane was a proteinfree solution
`with ions in equilibrium with the albumin solution
`The solutions were maintained at 37°C The flow of
`albumin and proteinfree electrolyte through the artifi
`cial kidney was maintained at 500 mLimin by two
`peristaltic pumps The volume was maintained by an
`adjustable clamp on the tubing leading from the artifi
`cial kidney and an increased transmembrane pressure
`was necemary with increasing pH
`pH was increased from 4 to 9 in 14 steps by adding
`sodium hydroxide Constant results indicated that equi
`librium was reached 15 min after sodium hydroxide was
`added the samples were drawn after 30 min
`
`Abraxis EX2045
`Actavis LLC v Abraxis Bioscience LLC
`1PR201701101 1PR201701103 1PR201701104
`
`

`

`37°C
`
`been identical which was not always the case We used
`the ratio between molality and electrode result in the
`protein free solutions as a correction factor for convert
`ing the electrode results into molality of free ions in the
`respective albumin solutions assuming that the activ
`ity coefficients were the same on both sides of the
`membrane
`Liquid junction potentials Es caused by diffusion
`between the bridge solution solution 1 and the test
`solution solution 2 were calculated with the Hender
`son equation
`
`Es =RTFl f1
`
`f2gi
`
`g2 ing1ig2 3
`
`f =X mi Ai zi1 g =
`where F is the Faraday constant
`X mi Ai mi is the molality of free ion i and zi
`is the
`charge number The following limiting equivalent con
`
`ductivities were used unit S cm2 mol1 ANa+ = 66
`Art+ = 92 Acr = 9605 ACa2+ = 78 Aacc2 = 68 and Au
`from NOVA had a bridge solution
`= 49 The electrodes
`of KC1 2 molkg water and those from Radiometer had
`a bridge solution of NaHCO2 sodium formate 40
`molkg water All results with ion selective electrodes in
`the albumin solutions were subsequently corrected for
`the calculated difference in liquidjunction potential
`between the protein free solution and the albumin solu
`tion
`The uneven distribution of ions as measured with the
`ion selective electrodes was reported as an electric equi
`librium potential of size and direction irrespective of
`the ionic charge number To make the results compara
`ble we expressed
`the observed
`ionic distribution
`ratios as equilibrium potentials in mV The equilib
`for each ion was calculated with the
`rium potential
`Nernst equation
`
`all
`
`EisE = R T zi1 F1 lnmiamin
`
`4
`
`where the superscripts a and w denote the albumin and
`proteinfree water solutions respectively
`The binding of each ionic species to albumin was
`calculated as the difference between the molality oftotal
`and free ion in the albumin solutions
`
`mAbound = mitotal mifree
`
`6
`
`The molality of albumins own charge without bound
`
`ions 20 was calculated from the neutrality condition
`
`because albumins own charge balances the total charge
`of all other cations and anions
`
`=
`
`X mitotal zi
`
`6
`ions bound to albumin 4d
`
`pH 4
`
`9
`
`Fig 1 Experimental
`setup
`The hollow fiber artificial kidney in the middle and the containers
`for albumin
`thermostat Two roller pumps
`and dialysis
`fluid were immersed in a water
`provided the counter current circulation with the albumin solution being on the
`Inside of the hollow fibers and the dialysis fluid on the outside The transmem
`brane pressure could be regulated by a clamp on the albumin line coming from
`samples could be taken by the syringes The
`the artificial kidney Analytical
`had the same ions as the dialysis fluid in membrane
`albumin solution
`the time of sampling
`
`equilibrium at
`
`All samples were subject to many measurements The
`activity of Na K+ Ca2+ Li Cl and pH was mea
`electrodes with some overlap
`sured by ionselective
`KNA1 K+ and Nal one CL1 0 and Na not
`caused by an excess of electrode systems We used one
`commercially available two ICAls Ca2+ and pH and
`one BMS2 pH from Radiometer Copenhagen Den
`mark and one NOVA 11 K+ Na and Lit and one
`STAT Profile 1 K+ Na Ca and pH from NOVA
`Biomedical Waltham MA
`
`concentrations of sodium and potassium
`Substance
`were measured by flame emission photometry with an
`IL 343 flame photometer
`Instrumentation Laboratory
`Lexington MA calcium and lithium were measured by
`atomic absorption spectrophotometry with a Perkin
`Elmer 403 spectrophotometer Norwalk CT and chlo
`ride was measured with a CMT10 chloride titrator from
`Radiometer The mass concentration of water pap was
`loss of 1 mL during an
`determined from the weight
`overnight drying at 105 °C The mass concentration of
`albumin was determined by the weight after drying
`subtracting the mass concentration of salt The molality
`of albumin was determined from the mass concentra
`tions of albumin and water by using a molecular mass
`for albumin of 66 000 Da
`concentrations mmolL
`The measured substance
`were converted to molality mmolkg water by dividing
`by the mass concentration of water
`
`= Cip H20
`
`2
`
`The charge molality of all
`was calculated as
`
`We observed a variable bias due to unselectivity of the
`the extremes of
`ion selective electrodes especially at
`pH If all
`ions were free in the proteinfree solutions the
`molality of total ions and electrode reading should have
`
`7
`Zbound = mbound zi
`The molality of net charge of albumin Zt equalled
`CLINICAL CHEMISTRY Vol 39 No 11993
`
`49
`
`

`

`Znet
`
`Zo
`
`+ Zbound
`
`8
`
`which is the molality of impermeable charge determin
`ing the Donnan distribution The number of ions and
`charges per albumin molecule zbend zeeen and znet
`were obtained by dividing by the molality of albumin
`
`We calculated the Dorman potential ED from
`
`the molality of net charge of albumin in the albumin
`solutions and the molality of monovalent electrolyte
`mew on the protein free side of the membrane
`Eponnan =RTF11n ZnAmealt +
`1 + Znet27nsalt2°5
`
`9
`
`The theoretical Dorman distribution ratio rDenn for
`ion i can be calculated from Ersonnim
`
`= expzi F EIR T
`
`10
`
`Results
`The results were constant after 15 min indicating
`equilibrium and did not depend on the preceding pH
`
`indicating reversibility
`The binding of chloride is shown in Figure 2 At
`physiological pH seven chloride ions were bound per
`albumin molecule The binding increased with decreas
`ing pH especially below pH 54 which is the isoelectric
`pH where Z
`= 0 and where 11 chloride ions were
`bound per albumin molecule The number of chloride
`ions bound to one albumin molecule increased to 22 at
`pH 42
`The calcium binding to albumin is shown in Figure 3
`No calcium was bound between pH 50 and 45 but the
`binding curve indicated a beginning calcium binding
`below pH 45 The calcium binding increased strongly
`with increasing pH especially above pH 65 The curve
`was Sshaped with maximum slope at physiological pH
`
`25
`
`20
`
`15
`
`10
`
`5
`
`0
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`Fig 2 Binding of chloride
`Number of chloride ions bound per albumin molecule n as a function of pH
`
`60 CLINICAL CHEMISTRY Vol 39 No 1 1993
`
`2
`
`5
`
`5
`
`0
`
`3
`4
`5
`Fig 3 Binding of calcium
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`of 74 where one calcium ion was bound per albumin
`molecule
`Sodium potassium and lithium were not measurably
`bound to albumin at physiological pH At pH 5 both
`sodium and potassium showed negative binding the
`total molalitybeing 510 less than the molality of free
`ions measured with ionselective electrodes The appar
`ent binding of lithium varied in an unsystematic man
`ner below the isoelectric pH probably because of the
`
`lithium electrode having low selectivity towards W
`The relative bias of the lithium electrode ranged from
`+25 to 30 in the pH interval 49 but that of the
`
`other electrodes was far less
`Figure 4 shows the charge of one albumin molecule as
`a function of pH Albumins own charge decreased to
`zero at the isoelectric pH pH 54 and became negative
`with increasing pH because of the added sodium hy
`
`Albumins Charges
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`0
`
`10
`
`20
`
`30
`
`40
`
`6
`7
`8
`10
`3
`4
`5
`9
`Fig 4 The number of charges per albumin molecule as a function of
`PH
`Albumins own charge defined by the neutrality condition equalled the titration
`curve bound charge was the total charge of all bound ions and net charge
`was the sum of own and bound charges
`
`

`

`mV
`
`A E
`
`11
`
`PH13
`
`94st1
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`10
`
`5
`
`10
`
`5
`
`0
`
`10
`
`5
`
`0
`
`5
`
`10
`
`5
`
`0
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`10
`
`5
`
`0
`
`5
`
`10
`
`5
`
`0
`
`5
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`Fig 5 Residual
`liquid junction potential Donnan potential and membrane equilibrium potentials
`lb NOVA A Radiometer
`
`droxide The total charge of bound ions was always
`negative and it changed oppositely to albumins own
`charge as a function of pH with less chloride and more
`calcium being bound at increasing pH In this way the
`net charge of albumin changed less than its own charge
`changed At physiological pH the approximate charges
`= 17
`zbound = 6 and znet = 23 The changes per albumin
`per albumin molecule were as follows z
`molecule and pH unit at physiological pH were dzowni
`dpH = 76 dzbounddpH = 52 and dzdpH = 24
`These differential quotients are valid only at pH 74
`zuet was 14 at
`the isoelectric pH pH = 54 and
`became zero at one pH unit below the isoelectric pH
`pH 44
`The residual liquid junction potentials the calculated
`Donnan potential and the equilibrium potential deter
`mined by ionselective electrode for each ion as a func
`tion of pH are shown in Figure 5 The calculated
`residual liquidjunction potentials changed from 0 to
`1 mV in direction opposite to the calculated Eponnan
`which changed from 1 mV to 8 mV The Ems for
`each ion were 08 mV lower
`ED and the curves were parallel Table 1 gives
`
`regression data EsE vs EDonnan for each ion except
`lithium which had a larger variation Mean values
`were used for the regression when there was more than
`one electrode All correlation coefficients were >099
`the slopes were 1 but higher for chloride than for
`sodium and the SDs about
`the regression lines were
`<04 mV corresponding to a relative indeterminacy of
`<15 for a monovalent
`ion
`
`than the calculated
`
`Table 1 Regression of Elsa vs
`SD slope
`003
`004
`003
`003
`
`r
`
`0995
`0991
`0997
`0997
`
`SEE
`034 mV
`038 mV
`029 mV
`029 mV
`
`Slops
`106
`090
`112
`116
`
`Mean MI
`10 mV
`05 mV
`12 mV
`05 mV
`
`Ca2+
`Na
`
`Cl
`
`Discussion
`We have compared the ion activities over a semiper
`1911 1 A high degree of ion binding to albumin was
`meable membrane with those predicted by Donnan in
`
`observed especially of chloride and calcium so we used
`the net charge of albumin including bound ions for the
`calculations Theory and observation agreed well over a
`wide pH range which we take as a confirmation of the
`Donnan theory
`The discrepancy of 08 mV and slopes slightly differ
`ent from 1 may be due to lack of space from forbidden
`in the albumin solutions
`volumes or binding of water
`on pH were not taken
`These effects or their dependence
`into account because we had no independent way of
`determining them We were confined to using the con
`ventional molality and mass concentration of total wa
`ter Others have found
`g of water bound per gram
`of protein 4 which would equal 6 of total water
`in
`this study Because bound water by definition is not
`available for diffusible ions water binding might ex
`plain the Observed 510 negative binding of sodium at
`the lowest pH Binding of water would imply a higher
`
`CLINICAL CHEMISTRY Vol 39 No 11993
`
`51
`
`

`

`and the observed E
`
`ion binding With sodium being the most
`degree of
`free ion the calculated net charge of albumin
`abundant
`should then be more positive and the calculated Don
`nan potential should be lower improving the agreement
`between the calculated ED
`Equation 9 uses monovalent salt to calculate
`Some of the ions were actually divalent Ca2+ Taking
`this into account would further improve the agreement
`between EL9E and Erkmnan
`The observed binding of chloride and calcium to
`human albumin agrees with earlier studies The bind
`ing of chloride was studied by Scatchard et al 5 in
`1950 By dialysis conductometry and silversilver chlo
`ride electrodes and Scatchard plots they demonstrated
`two classes of binding sites at isoelectric pH one of 10
`binding sites with medium intrinsic affinity Ks = 44
`Lmol and the other of 30 binding sites with low
`intrinsic affinity KA = 11 Lmol A few binding exper
`iments at pH 32 revealed 31 chloride ions bound per
`albumin molecule in agreement with our study Chlo
`ride binding to human albumin was rediscovered by
`others 6 7 without
`reference to Scatchard Calcium
`binding has been studied by many authors We previ
`ously observed an increasing number of apparent bind
`ing sites with increasing pH which we interpreted as
`exposure of calcium binding carboxylate groups during
`
`the neutral unfolding of albumin 8 The emerging
`
`calcium binding at acid pH may similarly reflect an acid
`unfolding of albumin This study agrees with earlier
`calcium binding data We observed no albumin binding
`of sodium potassium or lithium but
`the results for
`because of interference
`lithium were less satisfactory
`
`from H+ in accord with Okorodudu et al 9 Binding of
`sodium was examined before 0 with the same result
`
`as ours
`The change in electrostatic free energy when charged
`particles come together can be used to convert binding
`data for small
`ions and proteins into intrinsic associa
`tion constants These are by definition independent of
`electric charge and they must be distinguished from the
`describing actual binding under
`apparent constants
`specific conditions The assumptions for intrinsic con
`stants are simple such as the whole net charge of
`albumin being evenly distributed on a sphere The total
`charges used for the conversion must be accurately
`known which can be difficult because several
`ions may
`be involved The net charges of albumin depicted in
`Figure 3 may help to provide more accurate
`intrinsic
`constants
`The bound charge contributes about onefourth to the
`
`net negative charge of albumin under physiological
`conditions helping to maintain the plasma colloid os
`motic pressure and plasma volume Furthermore the
`bound ions will have a stabilizing effect on plasma
`volume during disturbances of pH Instead of albumins
`own charge which will change according to the added
`acid or base the net charge of albumin will change only
`onethird because of chloride and calcium Plasma col
`loid osmotic pressure and plasma volume will decrease
`during an acidosis and increase during an alkalosis but
`binding and release of chloride and calcium will coun
`the changes
`teract
`Figge et al 11 recently studied the role of serum
`proteins in acidbase equilibria by using ultraffitration
`and pH They concluded
`the observed charge of
`that
`serum protein of 12 mmolL is solely attributable to
`serum albumin and less than hitherto assumed We did
`not include bicarbonate or magnesium but they proba
`bly bind to albumin in competition with chloride and
`calcium Our data indicate that at pH 74 and an
`albumin concentration of 06 mmolL the own charge of
`serum protein is 10 mmolL and the effective net
`charge including bound ions is 14 mmolL in close
`agreement with Figge et al
`
`References
`1 Donnan FG Theorie der Membrangleichgewichte und Mem
`branpotentiale bei Vorhandensein von nicht dialysierenden Elek
`trolyten Em Beitrag zur physikalischchemischen Physiologie Z
`Elektrochem 19111757281
`2 Tanford C Physical chemistry of macromolecules New York
`Sons 1960
`John Wiley
`3 Webster HL Colloid osmotic pressure theoretical aspects and
`background Clin Perinatol 1982950521
`4 Perutz MF Electrostatic effects in proteins Science 1978201
`118791
`5 Scatchard G Scheinberg 1H Armstrong SH Physical chemis
`try of protein solutions IV The combination of human serum
`albumin with chloride ion J Am Chem Soc 19507253540
`6 Panteghini M Bonora R Malchiodi A Calarco M Evaluation of
`
`the direct potentiometric method for serum chloride determina
`tion Comparison with the most commonly employed methodolo
`gies Clin Biochem 198619205
`7 Panteghini M Chloride binding to serum proteins Clin Chem
`1987336256
`8 FoghAndersen N The concentration of
`ionised calcium in
`plasma Measurement and some clinical applications Dan Med
`Bull 19883557582
`9 Okorodudu AO Burnett RW McComb R13 Bowers GN Eval
`uation of three first generation ion selective electrode analyzers
`for lithium systematic errors frequency of random interferences
`and recommendations
`based on comparison with flame atomic
`emission spectrometry Clin Chem 19903610410
`10 Kissel TR Sandifer JR Zumbulyadis N Sodium binding in
`human serum Clin Chem 19822844952
`11 Figge J Bossing TH Fend V The role of proteins in acid base
`equilibria J Lab Clin Med 199111745367
`
`52 CLINICAL CHEMISTRY Vol 39 No 1 1993
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket