throbber
7
`
`Chromatographic Techniques for
`the Characterization of Proteins
`
`Joost J M Holthuis
`and Reinoud J Driebergen
`
`1 INTRODUCTION
`
`and peptides
`The improvements in the chromatographic
`analysis of proteins
`significantly to the development of recombi
`during the last decade contributed
`nant pharmaceutical proteins The availability of these analytical methods for the
`and purity determination of proteins enabled the improvement of
`characterization
`the overall manufacturing
`process of pharmaceutical
`proteins
`As with all other pharmaceutical preparations recombinant pharmaceutical
`protein products must be thoroughly characterized Protein drugs must meet the
`same standards of safety purity and potency as conventional drugs The charac
`terization of the structure of a protein is complex because of the presence of a
`tertiary and quarternary structure Small structural
`primary secondary
`changes
`in a protein can influence the physicochemical
`as well as the activity
`properties
`and potency of
`the protein Different purification steps are used during the
`characteristics of the protein Such
`manufacturing that may change the structural
`changes may range from minor modifications eg deamidation of an Asp Patel
`and Borchardt 1990 to unfolding of
`the protein chain yielding biologically
`
`Joost J M Holthuis
`OctoPlus bv PO Box 722 2300 AS Leiden The Nether
`Reinoud J Driebergen
`Ares Serono 15bis Chemin des Mines CH1211
`Geneva Switzerland
`
`lands
`
`J N Herron et al eds Physical Methods to Characterize Pharmaceutical Proteins
`0 Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995
`
`243
`
`Abraxis EX2023
`Actavis LLC v Abraxis Bioscience LLC
`1PR201701101 1PR201701103 1PR201701104
`
`

`

`244
`
`Joost J M Holthuis and Reinoud J Driebergen
`
`inactive molecules Unfolding may result in the decomposition
`such as oxydation
`and fragmentation of the protein due to the fact that certain parts of the molecule
`normally part of the inner side of the tertiary structure are exposed to chemicals
`water and so forth
`For the determination of the purity of proteins the detection of impurities is of
`related Garnick et al
`importance The impurities are process host or product
`1988 Product related impurities can be the result of posttranslational changes or
`products that are formed during
`variability but are in most cases decomposition
`the purification process or upon storage Table I presents an overview of possible
`processes that can change the structure of a protein Geigert 1989 Recently an
`extended overview was published on the inactivation of proteins during chromato
`graphic analysis Sadana 1992
`The protein can also be changed intentionally With the introduction of large
`amounts of recombinant proteins more and more time is spent on the develop
`ment of chemical modifications of the proteins in order to change their disposition
`in vivo Covalent attachment of eg polyethylene glycol PEG chains shows
`promise for increasing the stability and protein solubility The resulting product
`contains a mixture of species characterized by a distribution in both the number
`and position of attachment of the PEG molecules The situation is even more
`that PEG is inherently polydispersal Characterization of
`complicated by the fact
`such a pegylated protein is important
`in order
`to be able to assure product
`
`consistency
`analysis of a pharmaceutical protein and its
`The qualitative and quantitative
`analytical methods
`relies on the use of sophisticated
`related compounds
`for
`identity and homogeneity of
`to be
`demonstrating the structural
`the proteins
`separated The application
`of multiple methods is imperative to ensure that a
`and its purity accurately as
`protein is thoroughly identified and characterized
`sessed For the analysis of pharmaceutical
`proteins the method must be able to
`
`Table I Possible Modifications of Proteins
`
`Mutation
`
`process
`
`conjugation
`
`Posttranslational
`
`Chemical
`
`Site directed mutagenesis
`
`Glycosylation
`
`Pegylation
`
`Formylation
`
`Acylation
`
`Phosphorylation
`
`Sulfatation
`
`Degradation
`
`pathways
`
`Fragmentation
`
`Deamidation
`
`Oxidation
`
`Disulfide scrambling
`
`Oligomerization
`
`Aggregation
`
`Crosslinking
`
`Proteolysis
`
`Denaturation
`
`

`

`Chromatographic Techniques
`
`245
`
`separate compounds that may only differ by one or a few amino acids or functional
`groups Considering the low diffusion coefficients of large biopolymers it
`is a real
`challenge to develop analytical chromatographic methods that enable the required
`
`affect
`
`noninteractive
`
`interactive
`
`separation
`Proteins are ampholytes and therefore the pH and the ionic strength of the
`behavior In addi
`mobile phase play an important role in their chromatographic
`tion temperature protein concentration and adsorbent surface characteristics
`in all modes of
`as well as in
`chromatography
`the analysis
`sizeexclusion chromatography These parameters are important
`structure of the protein may change when the
`because
`the threedimensional
`protein is in a nonphysiological environment and may be sensitive to slight
`changes in this environment
`these parameters also can be used to manipulate the
`protein structure in order to achieve separation
`an overview of the analytical chromatographic
`This chapter presents
`methods used for the characterization of proteins with an emphasis on pharmaceu
`tical proteins This chapter does not pretend to give a detailed and complete
`of proteins and peptides but rather presents an
`overview on the chromatography
`overview of approaches used to characterize proteins including the significant
`problems that can arise and relevant examples General
`information on the chro
`matography of peptides and proteins including the column materials used can be
`found elsewhere Mant and Hodges 1991
`
`2 REVERSED PHASE CHROMATOGRAPHY
`
`21 General
`
`Reversed phase chromatography RPC is the most frequently applied chro
`technique for the analysis especially for the determination of the
`matographic
`purity of peptides and intact proteins
`as well as for the analysis of peptide
`fragments obtained after enzymatic or chemical cleavage of the protein see also
`section 243 In RPC the protein generally loses its native structure and denatures
`Lau et al 1984 Denaturation
`and coulombic
`occurs when the hydrophobic
`interactions with the stationary andor mobile phase are stronger
`are maintaining the protein native structure The level of denaturation
`often
`depends on the time the sample resides on the column The elution of a protein is
`determined by the presence of hydrophobic amino acids as well as by the exposure
`regions to the column surface determined by a sequence of
`of hydrophobic
`amino acids The retention of the intact protein is based on the
`hydrophobic
`number of hydrophobic
`column sup
`residues that
`interact with the hydrophobic
`port and therefore is dependent on whether
`these hydrophobic areas are present on
`
`than those that
`
`

`

`246
`
`Joust J M Holthuis and Reinoud J Driebergen
`
`the outside of the protein when dissolved in the mobile phase The less polar
`residues can be shielded by conformational effects which results in an exposition
`of the more polar residues at the proteins surface during the analysis Nugent
`et al 1988 For peptides up to 15 amino acids there is a correlation between the
`hydrophobicity and retention on a C4 C8 and C18 bonded phase With larger
`compounds also the polypeptide chain length must be taken into account because
`the length of the chain determines the spatial structure Using the overall hydro
`phobicity of proteins based on retention parameters derived from small peptides
`a correlation was found with retention behavior under denaturing conditions for
`proteins ranging in molecular weight from 35 to 32 kDa Mant et al 1989 The
`conformation of the protein determines the exposure of hydrophobic
`regions to the
`stationary phase and thus regulates the retention of the protein Resolution of the
`denatured protein in RPC is achieved on the basis of the overall hydrophobicity of
`the sample and is mainly dominated by solvent effects
`Conformational changes on reversed phase and hydrophobic
`supports can
`lead to multiple states of the protein which can result in multiple or distorted
`peaks The control of the peak shape and the number of peaks in protein chroma
`of equilibria and the kinetic processes in
`tography require the understanding
`volved One can distinguish three kinetic
`processes where protein structural
`changes can affect behavior In the first case the changes are slow relative to the
`chromatographic migration time and the process is apparently irreversible In such
`cases several chromatographic peaks representing native and partially de
`natured compounds may be observed In the second case retention and halflives
`are comparable and distorted peaks can be observed Finally rapid changes occur
`and the system may act as though it were behaving ideally while at the same time
`significant changes have taken place on the chromatographic
`surface In principle
`such changes in order to enhance the possibility of
`one would like to prevent
`analyzing the native biologically active protein Karger and Blanco 1989 but in
`RPC this is almost an impossible task Therefore in order to prevent conforma
`is important to choose the circumstances in
`tional changes during the analysis it
`such a way that the analyte is present in one single conformation where in most
`cases the denaturation of the protein is complete The unfolding of proteins in a
`system can be controlled by the hydrophobicity of the packing
`chromatographic
`material Sometimes it
`reversed
`proteins under
`is possible to chromatograph
`in the folded conformation by carefully choosing the column
`phase conditions
`material Hanson et al 1992
`Changes in the quaternary structure often result in a significant change in the
`properties of the molecule because of dissocia
`molecular weight or hydrophobic
`tion or aggregation of the molecule Oligomers are high molecular weight com
`pounds and in most cases more hydrophylic when compared with the monomeric
`proteins Oligomers are therefore easily separated from the corresponding
`monomerssubunits by RPC
`
`

`

`Chromatographic Techniques
`
`247
`
`is often used in the quality control of pharmaceutical
`Peptide mapping
`lot to lot variations Isolation of peptides
`proteins and is then used to detect
`analysis and the determination of the amino acid
`following the chromatographic
`sequence of these peptides are tools that are used to determine the full sequence
`of a protein Peptide mapping of proteins is used to generate information on the
`primary structure of proteins Peptides produced from proteins by two or more
`different chain cleavage methods and analyzed by RPC give information on the
`identity of the protein Peptide mapping consists of an enzymatic eg trypsine or
`chemical eg cyanobromide CNBr digestion often preceded by reduction and
`carboxymethylation of free sulfhydryl groups with iodoacetic acid With peptide
`is possible to detect small changes in the protein eg replacement of a
`mapping it
`single amino acid The replacement of one amino acid in a peptide has in general a
`on the retention behavior on RPC In general RPC gives a
`dramatic influence
`high resolution separation of tryptic digests A typical run takes between 30 and
`60 min in order to obtain optimum separation of the peptide mixture The use of
`short reversed phase columns packed with 2µm pellicular particles
`can reduce
`the run time of a peptide to 15 min or less at elevated temperatures as was shown
`by Kalghatgi and Horvath 1988 for recombinant
`tissue plasminogen activator
`and recombinant human growth hormone rhGH For the determination of impu
`rities the method is less suitable In general
`to identify protein
`impurities below 10 by peptide mapping using RPC with UV detection as was
`shown by Clogston et al 1992 for recombinant
`human granulocyte
`stimulating factor
`
`it
`
`is difficult
`
`colony
`
`22 Stationary Phase
`
`The stationary phase used in RPC contains a hydrophobic
`surface and often
`consists of coated silica polymeric bonded silica and cross linked polymers
`Mant and Hodges 1991 Kennedy et al 1989 The matrices are in most cases
`coated with hydrophobic
`ligands such as in increasing order of hydrophobicity
`C2 C4 C8 C18 phenyl and cyanopropyl groups In general
`the retention time
`increases with increasing hydrophobicity of the ligands Decreasing particle size
`results in an increasing surface area and thus in a higher resolution
`The most frequently used column materials are silica based with a pore size
`of 100 to 300 A These phases are only stable at pH 2 to 8 The phases consisting of
`a polymer coating on silica are more inert to chemical degradation when compared
`silica bound packings These stationary phases are stable in
`with the conventional
`the pH region of 2 to 10
`Replacement of the silica as base of the reversed phase material by a polymer
`increases the stability further An example is the C4 C8 and C18 anchored to the
`
`

`

`248
`
`Joost J M Holthuis and Reinoud J Driebergen
`
`of
`
`phobic packings
`
`polymer skeleton eg polyvinylalcohol Other examples are cross linked hydro
`like hydroxylated polyether eg TSK polystyrenedivinyl
`benzene eg PLRPS polystyrene Maa and Horvath 1988 polymethacrylate
`and polymeric fluorocarbon These stationary phases are stable in the pH region
`of 1 to 13 Kato et al 1990 The pore size 504000 A of the column material is
`and must match the molecular size of the sample in order to
`importance
`eliminate undesired exclusion Polymeric polystyrene packings with particle
`diameters of 5 pm and pores of 300 A are in general superior in terms of resolution
`and sample recovery Burton et al 1988
`Reversed phase material based on silica and polymer based material often
`show a different selectivity probably due to unwanted
`between
`interactions
`silanol groups and the protein eg for proinsulin and insulin Linde and Welinder
`1991ab
`
`23 Mobile Phase
`
`The mobile phase often consists of mixtures of organic solvents to which
`organic or anorganic acids are added Isocratic elution of the proteins is possible
`however
`retention of the protein is strongly affected by the percentage of the
`organic modifier It
`is very difficult to prepare the mobile phase to be so reproduc
`ible that consistent data are obtained Therefore a gradient elution system is
`usually used that results in higher resolution and is most effective in the control of
`the retention time Elution is started with aqueous acid solutions of eg trifluoro
`acetic acid TFA phosphoric acid perchloric acid and heptafluorobutyric acid
`such as phosphoric acid perfluorinated carboxylic acids and trial
`Compounds
`kylammonium phosphate act as ion pairing agents The pH of
`the aqueous
`solutions is in the range of 2 to 5 The use of hydrochloric acid HC1 instead of
`TFA has some advantages
`such as a greater optical clarity that enables the
`low wavelengths
`detection at
`A recent development
`is the use of formic acid instead of phosphoric acid or
`TFA in the mobile phase for the chromatography
`of proteins Formic acid enables
`low wavelengths and because of its
`the detection of nonaromatic
`peptides at
`is easily removed Detection at 214 nm is possible with good resolu
`volatility it
`tion Formic acid is a mild acid that does not damage the column Poll and
`Harding 1989 1991
`The starting eluent
`is followed by a displacing
`eluent
`is an organic
`solvent such as methanol acetonitrile 1propanol or 2propanol The mobile
`and
`denaturation by disrupting the intramolecular hydrophobic
`phase causes
`coulombic forces The organic solvents can be ranked according to decreasing
`elutropic strength as compared to water which results in the following order
`
`that
`
`

`

`Chromatographic Techniques
`
`249
`
`fact
`
`propanol > acetonitrile > methanol > water Experimental variables that affect
`in RPC are temperature pH solvents buffers additives flow
`the elution behavior
`rate gradient program and sample pretreatment Nugent et al 1988
`RPC is very suitable for the analysis of hydrophilic proteins and peptides
`proteins eg membrane proteins often give poor recovery
`More hydrophobic
`and multiple peaks and may not elute or may be considerably
`retarded Protein
`aggregates can result in plugging of the stationary phase and poor recovery The
`that many proteins are not fully recovered from the analytical column often
`makes RPC not suitable for quantitative analysis These problems are sometimes
`and stationary phase andor a
`solved by optimization of the elution conditions
`correct sample preparation Aggregation can sometimes be prevented by modify
`ing the mobile phase by the addition of sodium dodecyl sulfate SDS 313chol
`CHAPS Solubilization of
`amidopropyldimethylammonio1propanesulfonate
`the protein can be obtained by using acids detergents andor chaotropic agents
`eg SDS CHAPS guanidine Triton X100 octyl glucoside or urea Also
`sodium cholate or Emulgen 991 have been used in order to solubilize membrane
`analysis Kato et al 1987 The addition of
`proteins prior to chromatographic
`such compounds results in dissolution of the protein but very often it also results
`in loss of the secondary and tertiary structure Because of the denaturation of the
`proteins in RPC it
`is not always suitable to study small changes in the protein
`conformation
`
`24 Examples
`
`241 CONFORMATIONAL CHANGES DURING CHROMATOGRAPHY
`AND RETENTION BEHAVIOR
`
`is
`
`acid acts
`
`Thevenon and Regnier 1989 studied the influence of formic acid concentra
`tion on retention and protein structure The conformation of
`the proteins
`below 10 the
`strongly dependent on the acid concentration At concentrations
`as an amine pairing agent and the protein is partially denaturated
`Between 10 and 30 the protein is further denaturated
`and the hydrophobic
`residues become exposed to the solvent The hydrophobicity of the species is
`increased and hence the retention increases Above 30 the solution becomes so
`residues begin to migrate into the interior of some
`the hydrophobic
`polar that
`highly denatured structure and they are finally shielded from the aqueous phase
`above 30 is not only due to the
`The decrease in retention at concentrations
`higher solvophilic power of formic acid relative to water but also to various
`conformational states of the proteins Thevenon and Regnier 1989
`the retention behavior and resolution
`The temperature may also influence
`
`

`

`250
`
`Joost J M Holthuis and Reinoud J Driebergen
`
`Cohen et al 1984 The effect of the temperature can be explained by different
`levels of unfolding of the protein in the mobile phase The effect of the tempera
`experiments with ribonuclease A RNase on
`ture was shown in chromatographic
`an n butyl column RNase elutes in two peaks at 25 °C and as one peak at 37°C
`The first peak proved to be the native peak while the second peak is the denatu
`rated compound Fig 1
`behavior of RNase A on RPC is not
`ideal Lu et al
`The chromatographic
`1986 Cohen et al 1985 showed that
`the peak shape can be distorted due to
`refolding of the protein during elution The binding of the proteins to the column
`material was also determined by the components of the mobile phase This
`indicated that broad peak shapes can be due to reversible conformational changes
`during the elution of a protein Cohen et al 1985
`The choice of organic solvent can influence the conformation of the protein
`in solution and influences the binding of proteins to C8 alkyl bonded silica It was
`shown for several proteins that 1propanol
`induces conformational changes of the
`surface associated protein Katzenstein etal 1986 At low pH a lower concen
`
`10
`
`30°
`
`1137
`
`10
`
`15
`
`10
`
`1
`
`15
`
`10
`
`15
`
`Figure 1 RPLC behavior of pancreatic
`
`TIME minutes
`ribonuclease A RNase as a function of temperature at pH 22
`Conditionssolvent A 10 mM H3PO4 pH 22 solvent B 5545 vv HH3PO4 concentration
`mM gradient 585 B in 30 mm linear flow rate 1 mlmin column 10m C4 LiChrospher SI 500
`100 x 46 rmn inner diameter sample size 140 pg RNase detection 254nm 01 AUFS Cohen et al
`1984
`
`is 10
`
`

`

`Chromatographic Techniques
`
`251
`
`tration of 1propanol is required to induce conformational changes as compared to
`neutral conditions Sadler et al 1984
`Retention parameter Z slope of log capacity factor k versus log molar
`in the mobile phase and log the
`concentration of organic modifier 1propanol
`value of log k at 1 M 1propanol can be used to describe the relation between the
`retention and the state of unfolding of a protein Lin and Karger 1990 The Z and
`values increased from folded surface unfolded urea unfolded to reduced un
`folded for a series of small globular proteins These experiments proved that
`proteins with their disulfide bridges cleaved have the largest degree of unfolding
`Each protein was present in four conformational states This relation between the
`parameters and the state of unfolding opens possibilities for the measurement of
`the rate or state of unfolding The differences between strongly related compounds
`with regard to the change in conformation on the column during elution can be
`used to obtain an optimal separation as was shown by Oroszlan et al 1992 who
`studied the retention of rhGH and the retention of methioninerhGH MetrhGH
`Retention of rhGH decreases with increasing column temperature when 1pro
`is used as an organic modifier while the retention increases with tempera
`panol
`ture when acetonitrile is employed Desorption and elution with 1propanol was
`correlated with a solvent induced conformational change The retention increase
`obtained with acetonitrile correlated with the temperature rise and was caused by a
`change yielding a more hydrophobic
`In this case a
`partial structural
`species
`surface driven process was suggested
`lower protein yields from
`In general
`are obtained with acetonitrile when compared with
`reversed chromatography
`1propanol The change in the 3 sheet structure of bovine achymotrypsinogen on
`alkyl and phenyl bonded phases when eluted at different pH and concentration
`3040 of 1propanol proved to be independent of the alkyl chain length The
`structure was changed to the same extent after leaving the protein interaction with
`the column material and releasing it back into solution Drake et al 1989
`suggesting a solvent driven rather
`than a surface driven process
`Depending on the type of column used it
`is sometimes possible to perform
`RPC without an organic solvent A polymeric stationary phase divinylbenzene
`based in combination with acetic acid gradients in water without organic mod
`ifiers was used to determine rhGH in a crude acetic acid extract of Escherichia coli
`in which the protein was expressed Other proteins such as interleukin113 glu
`cagon and insulin are eluted as sharp symmetrical peaks with acetic acid gradients
`in water acetonitrile or isopropanol Welinder and Sorensen 1991
`
`242 SEPARATION OF INTACT PROTEINS
`
`For the development and quality control of pharmaceutical proteins it
`is often
`necessary to have analytical methods available that separate proteins that differ
`
`

`

`252
`
`Joost J M Holthuis and Reinoud J Driebergen
`
`it
`
`only in one or a few amino acids One example is the separation of muteins
`proteins that differ by only a few amino acids caused by a mutation in the DNA
`sequence Other examples are the separation of oxidized proteins and the deter
`mination of the number and the position of Cys residues
`Under carefully controlled conditions
`is possible to separate mixtures of
`insulins that have minimaldifferences in structure eg a single uncharged residue
`McLeod and Wood 1984 From this it
`is concluded that retention of insulin
`proteins on the reversed phase column is determined by the entire exposed surface
`of the molecule rather
`than a specific region
`RPC can also be used for the separation of related recombinant proteins in the
`fermentation broth after a selective online sample clean up Hayashi et al 1987
`Human recombinant epidermal growth factors rhEGF were determined quantita
`tively in cultured media The analytes were isolated on a C18 protein coated pre
`column and separated on an analytical TSK ODS 120T column The rhEGF153
`was separated from rhEGF1471 and 1511 The isolation of the compounds on
`the precolumn was superior when compared with offline protein precipitation
`with trichloroacetic acid TCA
`The replacement of one amino acid can change the conformation of a protein
`molecule Such conformational changes can often be monitored by RPC Brems
`et al 1988 studied the effect of replacing Lys 112 with Leu in bovine growth
`hormone bGH approx 190 amino acids on the folding process The retention
`time of the Leu mutant was increased from 165 to 25 min when compared with the
`conditions The conformation of the mutant
`wild type under denaturing
`in its
`native state was indistinguishable from that of the wild type These results indicate
`form is more sensitive for the denaturing
`agent guanidineHC1
`the mutant
`36 M than the wild type
`Kunitani et al 1986 studied the retention behavior of several recombinant
`human interleukin2 IL2 muteins These muteins differ in the presence of Ala at
`position 1 and contain different amino acids at positions 58 104 105 and 125
`Table II The replacement of one single amino acid resulted in most cases in a
`in retention time The muteins eluting as peak A contain a methionine
`sulfoxide at 104 When the muteins were reduced compounds with subscript red
`toward longer retention times was observed
`indicating that more hydro
`a shift
`
`that
`
`shift
`
`phobic regions are exposed to the stationary phase
`The Nterminal heterogeneity
`and the oxidation states of the methionines
`were also studied The species that contains the oxidized methionine group elutes
`prior to the nonoxidized species Table II Oxidation of methionine residues of
`results in more hydrophilic compounds Frelinger and Zull
`proteins in general
`1984 described the elucidation of the structure of the three oxidized forms of
`bovine parathyroid hormone which could be separated with RPC
`human granulocyte macrophagecolony
`Purified recombinant
`stimulating
`rhGMCSF was characterized with RPC Analysis of
`the compound
`
`factor
`
`

`

`Chromatographic Techniques
`
`253
`
`Table II Retention Times of IL 2 Muteins in RPHPLCa
`time mm
`Peak B Peak A
`
`Mutein
`
`Retention
`
`Peak B Peak Are
`
`AlaiCys125 parent
`
`AlalSer125
`
`desAlaiCysi25
`
`desAlalSer125
`
`desAlaiA1a125
`
`desAlaiAlai°4Ser125
`
`desAlaiSer58
`
`desAlalSerio
`
`390
`
`346
`
`388
`
`346
`
`409
`
`328
`
`389
`
`380
`
`°From Kunitani et al 1986
`
`332
`
`296
`
`330
`
`297
`
`346
`
`363
`
`319
`
`361
`
`321
`
`381
`
`364
`
`352
`
`350
`
`314
`
`349
`
`314
`
`366
`
`300
`
`199
`
`203
`
`5 is the native
`
`showed the presence of the major peak and five small peaks see Fig 2 The six
`compounds were isolated by RPC and subjected to proteolytic digest with trypsin
`and protease V8 The digests were analyzed by RPC and the separated peptides
`were subjected to fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry FABMS Frac
`tions 1 to 4 proved to be rhGMCSF derivatives of which different methionines are
`oxidized Fraction 6 proved to be rhGMCSF of which two amino acids at the N
`terminal were deleted Met Ala Ohgami et al 1989 Peak
`compound
`RPC is the method of choice for studying the position number and oxidation
`status of the cysteine residues The presence of S S bridges strongly contributes to
`the conformation and refolding of a protein Direct analysis of the disulfide
`content of proteins can be a method for monitoring the stability and refolding
`process of cysteinecontaining proteins The general approach of the determina
`tion of the number of cysteines and cystines involves
`the carboxymethylation of
`acid and radiolabeled iodoacetic
`acid The first
`the protein with iodoacetic
`carboxymethylation is performed prior to reduction of the protein and the second
`carboxymethylation is performed following reduction The samples are analyzed
`by RPC with UV and radiochemical detection
`A compound whose refolding process was studied extensively by RPC is
`rhIL2 Recombinant hIL2 is a hydrophobic protein with a limited aqueous solu
`using aqueous acetonitrile and TFA as eluent
`bility and can be chromatographed
`Due to the presence of three cysteines in endogenous rhIL2 three isomers can be
`formed each with a different disulfide bridge Weir and Sparks 1987 studied the
`refolding of rhIL2 Recombinant hIL2 expressed in E colt was isolated as
`inclusion bodies after cell breakage Recombinant hIL2 and contaminants were
`dissolved and further purified in reduced and denatured form by gel permeation
`chromatography Refolding took place by diluting the solvent Renaturationauto
`
`

`

`254
`
`Joost J M Holthuis and Reinoud J Driebergen
`
`r5
`
`r6
`
`Fr4
`Fr3
`Fr2
`Fr1
`
`nn
`
`280
`
`at
`
`Absorbance
`
`0
`
`20
`
`40
`
`Retention time min
`Figure 2 HPLC profile on a reversed phase column of renatured rhGMCSF Ohgami et al 1989
`
`the
`
`oxidation was initiated and two peaks were observed on RPC C18 The first peak
`to elute was oxidized folded IL2 and the second peak was the less bioactive
`reduced IL2 When the renaturation
`time was increased peak 1 grew at
`expense of peak 2
`Browning and coworkers 1986 also used RPC C4 to clarify the structure
`rhIL2 In the presence of a chaotrope
`and disulfide scramble of nonglycosylated
`the proper disulfide bond is scrambled resulting in a mixture of the three disulfide
`isomers The identity of each of the three forms was determined by labeling of the
`acid and subsequent peptide mapping The
`free cysteines with 311iodoacetic
`nonnative isomers showed a less hydrophobic
`behavior when compared with the
`native form The fully reduced rhIL2 is more hydrophobic
`than the native form
`From this it was concluded that
`the nonnative isomers retain some folded struc
`ture to mask a hydrophobic
`region of the molecule
`Kunitani and coworkers 1986 studied variants of rh1L2 Endogenous IL2 has
`only one disulfide bridge between amino acid 58 and 105 but it contains three cys
`teines at positions 58105 and 125 respectively Recombinant desAlaSer125IL2
`is a protein that can only form one cystine disulfide The cys125 is replaced by a
`serine by sitespecific mutagenesis which resulted in an improved stability The
`and the complete reduced intact native
`of this compound
`complete reduction
`retention Table II The complete reduction
`molecule result in an increase of
`regions to the stationary phase
`probably results in an exposure of the hydrophobic
`The compounds with intact cystine bridges are less hydrophobic
`
`because
`
`the
`
`

`

`Chromatographic Techniques
`
`255
`
`intact
`
`regions are covered in the tertiary structure The other muteins
`hydrophobic
`exhibit the same behavior Reduction results in an increase of retention
`OKeefe and coworkers 1992 determined
`the number of cysteines in
`aeruginosa exotoxin A40 TGFa
`transforming growth factoraPseudomonas
`PE40 a fusion protein expressed in E colt The number of cysteines was
`determined by derivatization of the cysteine moieties in reduced protein with
`can be selectively
`monobromobimane The resulting derivative
`detected with
`
`fluorescence detection It not possible to separate PE40 M = 40000 from the
`fusion protein TGFaPE40 M = 44960 However with derivatization
`of the cysteines in TGFaPE40 prior to RPC it was possible to discriminate the
`cysteine free PE40 from TGFetPE40 OKeefe et al 1992
`Chromatography of pituitary derived hGH PhGH and biosynthetic hGH
`BhGH was described Christensen et al 1990 Small peaks were visible in the
`in addition to the dominating hGH peak
`chromatograms of both compounds
`BhGH consistently elutes as a slightly sharper peak when compared with PhGH
`isocratic conditions This is caused by the absence of a 201cDa
`under various
`fraction in the BhGH The 201Da compound is a decomposition
`product of hGH
`obtained after deletion of amino acid residues 3246 from the 22K hGH Al
`though both compounds differ significantly in molecular weight separation could
`not be obtained with RPC
`human interferons rhINF were analyzed on
`Different forms of recombinant
`a reversed system Felix et al 1985 The method was able to separate rhIFNetA
`rhIFNaD and the hybrid rhIFNaAD Recombinant hIFNaA and rhIFNaD
`differ about 15 in their amino acids In addition it was possible to separate the
`rhIFNaA fast migrating monomer CyslCys98 and Cys29Cys138 from the
`slow migrating monomer Cys29Cys138 and from the oligomers When the
`CyslCys98 bridge was replaced only the slow migrating monomer was found
`
`243 PEPTIDE MAPPING
`
`Recombinant hIL2 expressed in E coli was identified by Nterminal se
`quence and by peptide mapping Lahm and Stein 1985 Disulfides were deter
`mined by using a double label Scarboxymethylation procedure with tritiated
`iodoacetic acid and cold iodoacetic acid The labeled compound was digested with
`The retention of labeled peptides
`trypsin and the peptides were chromatographed
`was detected and indicated the presence of cysteine residue A disulfide linkage
`between cysteine residues at positions 58 and 105 was confirmed About 90 of
`the isolated rhIL2 contained a methionine residue at the N terminus
`Renlund et al 1990 described the routine peptide mapping of recombinant
`human immunodeficiency virus HIV proteins p24 core an

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket