throbber
VOLUME 23
`
`NUMBER
`
`31
`
`NOVEMBER
`
`1 2005
`
`JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
`
`ORIGINAL REPORT
`
`OilBased
`
`Phase III Trial of Nanoparticle AlbuminBound
`Paclitaxel Compared With Polyethylated Castor
`Paclitaxel in Women With Breast Cancer
`William J Gradishar Sergei Tjulandin Neville Davidson Heather Shaw Neil Desai Paul Bhar
`
`Michael Hawkins and Joyce OShaughnessyABSTRACT
`
`Purpose
`albumin bound paclitaxel
`ABI007 the first biologically interactive
`in a nanameter particle
`castor oilbased standard paclitaxel
`free of solvents was compared with polyethylated
`patients with metastatic breast cancer M BC This phase III study was performed to confirm
`preclinical studies demonstrating superior efficacy and reduced toxicity of ABI007 compared
`with standard paclitaxel
`
`in
`
`Patients and Methods
`Patients were randomly assigned to 3 week cycles of either ABI007 260 mgm2 intrave
`nously without premedication n = 229 or standard paclitaxel 175 mgm2 intravenously with
`premedication n = 225
`
`Results
`ABI007 demonstrated
`
`significantly higher
`
`response rates compared with standard paclitaxel
`
`33 v 19 respectively P = 001 and significantly longer time to tumor progression 230 v
`was significantly lower for ABI007 compared with standard paclitaxel 9 v22 respectively
`hazard ratio = 075 P = 006 The incidence of grade 4 neutropenia
`169 weeks respectively
`P < 001 despite a 49 higher paclitaxel dose Febrile neutropenia was uncommon < 2
`and the incidence did not differ between the two study arms Grade 3 sensory neuropathy was
`more common in the ABI007 arm than in the standard paclitaxel arm 10 v2 respectively
`P< 001 but was easily managed and improved rapidly median 22 days No hypersensitivity
`reactions occurred with ABI007 despite the absence of premedication and shorter administra
`tion time
`
`Conclusion
`ABI007 demonstrated greater
`compared with
`and
`favorable
`safety profile
`efficacy
`a
`in this patient population The improved therapeutic
`index and elimination
`standard paclitaxel
`required for solvent based taxanes make the novel albumin
`of corticosteroid
`premedication
`in the treatment of MBC
`bound paclitaxel ABI007 an important advance
`
`J Clin Oncol 237794780310
`
`2005 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`The currently available taxanes paclitaxel
`Taxol BristolMyers Squibb Co Prince
`ton NJ and docetaxel Taxotere Aventis
`Inc Bridgewater NJ play
`Pharmaceuticals
`role in the treatment of breast
`a central
`cancer Because the taxanes are highly hy
`drophobic commercially available formula
`
`tions include
`
`solvents to enable
`synthetic
`parenteral administration paclitaxel con
`tains a combination of polyethylated castor
`oil Cremophor EL BASF Ludwigshafen
`and ethanol
`Germany
`the vehicle
`and polysorbate
`
`as
`
`80 and an ethanol diluent
`
`are the vehicles for docetaxe12
`
`Although
`paclitaxel
`proved to have significant activity against
`
`docetaxel
`
`and
`
`From Northwestern University
`
`BioScience
`
`IL Duke University Medical
`Chicago
`Center Durham NC American
`Inc Santa Monica CA
`Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer
`Center US Oncology Dallas TX
`Russian Cancer Research Center
`Moscow Russia and Broomfield
`
`Hospital Essex United Kingdom
`
`Submitted November 9 2004 accepted
`April 28 2005
`
`by American
`Supported
`Inc Santa Monica CA
`
`BioScience
`
`Presented
`
`in part at
`
`the 26th Annual
`
`San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium
`San Antonio TX December 36 2003
`
`Authors
`
`disclosures
`
`of potential
`
`con
`
`flicts of
`
`interest are found at
`
`the end of
`
`this article
`
`reprint requests
`
`Address
`to William J
`Gradishar MD Director Breast Oncol
`ogy Division of HematologyOncology
`Robert H
`Department
`of Medicine
`
`Cancer Center
`
`Northwestern
`
`Lurie Comprehensive
`University 676 N St
`Clair Ste 850 Chicago IL 60611
`email wgradisharnorthwesternedu
`
`0 2005 by American
`Oncology
`
`Society
`
`of Clinical
`
`0732183X0523317794$2000
`
`DOI 101200JC0200504937
`
`7794
`
`Abraxis EX2017
`Actavis LLC v Abraxis Bioscience LLC
`1PR201701101 1PR201701103 1PR201701104
`
`

`

`ABI007 Versus Paclitaxel
`
`in MBC
`
`breast cancer and other solid tumors emerging data indi
`cate that the solvents polyethylated castor oil and polysorbate
`80 directly contribute to the severe toxicities observed in pa
`tients treated with paclitaxel or docetaxel Among the well
`solvent related toxicities
`characterized
`are hypersensitivity
`reactions which can rarely be fatal even with corticosteroid
`premedication and prolonged sometimes irreversible pe
`ripheral neuropathy associated with demyelination and ax
`onal degeneration 5 More recently it has been recognized
`that these solvents may adversely affect efficacy because of
`entrapment of active drug in micelles formed in the plasma
`compartment67 leading to increased systemic drug expo
`sure decreased drug clearance nonlinear pharmacokinetics
`Drug en
`and lack of dose dependent antitumor activity6
`trapment affects not only the taxanes but also the coadminis
`tered drugs eg anthracyclines
`and thus is an important
`consideration in the design of combination therapies6
`ABI007 Abraxane American BioScience Inc Santa
`Monica CA is a novel biologically interactive nanometer
`sized albumin bound paclitaxel particle initially
`developed
`to avoid the toxicities associated with polyethylated castor
`is the first of a new class of anticancer
`oil
`agents that
`incorporate albumin particle technology
`and exploit
`the
`unique properties of albumin a natural carrier of lipophilic
`molecules in humans Administered as a colloidal suspen
`sion of 130 nanometer particles ABI007 allows the safe infu
`than the doses
`sion of significantly higher doses of paclitaxel
`
`It
`
`9
`
`conventional
`
`infusion
`therapy with shorter
`used with standard paclitaxel
`schedules 30 minutes v 3 hours respectively and no pre
`medication In addition the albumin bound nanoparticle
`was designed to preferentially deliver paclitaxel
`to tumors by
`biologically interacting with albumin receptors that mediate
`in vitro studies have demonstrated a 45 fold
`drug transport
`increase in paclitaxel transport across endothelial cells for ABI
`007 compared with standard paclitaxe11°
`A phase I trial of ABI007 in 19 patients with advanced
`solid tumors determined the maximumtolerated dose to
`be 300 mgm2 which is approximately 70 higher than the
`paclitaxel 175 mgm212 No severe hyper
`occurred with ABI007 despite the
`sensitivity reactions
`absence of premedication and administration over 30 min
`utes Dose limiting toxicities included sensory neuropathy
`stomatitis and superficial keratopathy which occurred at a
`dose of 375 mgm2 Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed lin
`increases in paclitaxel maximum concentration
`and
`ear
`time curve over the ABI007
`area under the concentration
`dose range of 135 to 300 mgm2
`A phase II
`Ibrahim et al submitted for publica
`trial
`tion evaluating ABI007 at 300 mgm2 in patients with
`metastatic breast cancer MBC demonstrated an overall
`response rate ORR of48 with a response rate of 64 for
`patients who received ABI007 as first line therapy Time to
`tumor progression TTP was 266 weeks
`for all patients
`and 481 weeks for patients with confirmed tumor respons
`
`es median overall survival was 636 weeks The observed
`adverse events AEs of myelosuppression and peripheral
`than what
`neuropathy were less frequent and less severe
`would be expected with comparable doses of standard pac
`litaxe112 No severe ocular events occurred and no hyper
`sensitivity reactions were reported despite the absence of
`premedication These findings suggested that ABI007 may
`offer important advantages over standard paclitaxel and
`supported the conduct of this phase III
`trial
`The present study was designed to directly compare the
`efficacy and safety of ABI007 with standard paclitaxel
`in
`patients with MBC in a randomized trial The dose of ABI
`007 was reduced from the maximumtolerated dose used in
`the phase II study to 260 mgm2 with the expectation that
`the ABI007 regimen would not be more toxic than the
`standard dose of standard paclitaxel 175 mgm2
`
`PATIENTS AND METHODS
`
`conducted
`
`randomized open label phase III study was
`This international
`at 70 sites 28 RussiaUkraine sites 350 patients 22
`United StatesCanada
`sites 37 patients and 20 United Kingdom
`sites 67 patients The protocol and related materials were ap
`proved by the appropriate institutional review boards and in
`The study was conducted in
`dependent ethics committees
`compliance with Good Clinical Practice Guidelines of the In
`ternational Conference on Harmonization and the Declara
`tion of Helsinki Written informed consent was required from
`
`all patients
`
`Patient Population
`
`Nonpregnant nonlactating females at least 18 years of age
`with histologically or cytologically confirmed measurable MBC
`and an expected survival of more than 12 weeks were eligible for
`participation Patients were included if
`they were candidates
`for
`single agent paclitaxel therapy had not received paclitaxel or do
`cetaxel for metastatic carcinoma had not relapsed with metastatic
`disease within 1 year of adjuvant paclitaxel or docetaxel
`treatment
`had no other malignancy within the previous 5 years except non
`melanoma skin cancer cervical
`intraepithelial neoplasia or in situ
`cervical cancer and had acceptable clinical
`laboratory test results
`at baseline
`Patients were excluded from participation if they had clinical
`evidence of active brain metastasis or a clinically serious concur
`illness an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ECOG
`rent
`performance status of more than 2 received hormone therapy for
`2 weeks or chemotherapy immunotherapy or another investiga
`tional drug for 4 weeks before administration of the first study
`dose preexisting peripheral neuropathy of grade 1 according to
`Institute Common Toxicity Criteria or a history
`National Cancer
`of allergic or hypersensitivity reactions to the study drug or any of
`its excipients
`
`Treatment
`Eligible patients were randomly assigned 11 to receive treat
`ment every 3 weeks with either ABI007 260 mgm2 intravenously
`over 30 minutes without corticosteroid or antihistamine premedica
`tion or special infusion sets or standard paclitaxel 175 mgm2 intra
`venously over 3 hours with premedication and special infusion sets as
`
`wwwjcoorg
`
`7795
`
`

`

`Gradishar et al
`
`taxel n = 225 were considered the intent to treat ITT
`population Almost all > 99 of the ABI007 infusions
`were administered in 50 minutes or less and 815 were
`infused over 30 minutes 229 of the standard paclitaxel
`infusions were longer than the planned infusion time of 180
`minutes Actual delivered paclitaxel dose intensity was 49
`higher in the ABI007 group than in the standard paclitaxel
`group mean ± standard deviation 8513 ± 3118 mgm2 v
`5702 ± 3008 mgm2 per week respectively At least six
`cycles were administered
`129 patients
`treatment
`56 in the ABI007 group and 112 patients 50 in
`
`the standard paclitaxel group The last patient came off
`study in April 2004
`
`to
`
`indicated in the prescribing information Within country balance
`for anthracycline exposure was ensured by within country stratifica
`and naive groups Up to two dose
`tion into anthracyclineexposed
`reductions 40 mgm2 each were allowed from the initial 260 mgm2
`dose of ABI007 Reductions
`doses were al
`in standard paclitaxel
`insert for each country
`
`lowed according to the package
`
`Assessments
`Imaging studies were performed at baseline at weeks 5 9
`and 15 and at
`the end of treatment Responses were assessed
`according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor guide
`lines13 Complete and partial responses required subsequent con
`firmation of response > 4 weeks later
`The primary efficacy measure was ORR secondary efficacy
`measures were TTP and overall survival Quality of life QOL
`assessment data ECOG performance status scores from the Eu
`ropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Qual
`ity of Life Questionnaire C30 and body weight were collected
`
`Statistical Analysis
`The statistical power of this study was based on a noninferi
`ority design proving that ABI007 was at least 75 as active as
`standard paclitaxel assuming an ORR 20 greater
`than the ORR
`of standard paclitaxel The design had 80 power with a one
`sided type I error of 0025 twosided a = 050 All statistical
`analyses were performed with SAS Version 82 SAS Institute Inc
`Cary NC The primary efficacy analysis consisted of three nested
`tests which were conducted
`sequentially and contingent on the
`these tests were noninferiority with
`prior tests being successful
`all patients superiority with all patients and superiority with
`receiving study drug as first line therapy Treatment dif
`patients
`ferences in TTP and survival were analyzed
`using the Kaplan
`Meier method QOL which was measured using the European
`Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of
`Life Questionnaire C30 was analyzed as change from baseline at
`each cycle ECOG performance status was analyzed by cycle and as
`the worst score at any time during the study The influence of
`prognostic factors on ORR was assessed using a logistic regression
`model with effects for country treatment group prognostic fac
`tor and treatment group byprognostic
`factor interaction AEs
`and laboratory toxicities were classified and graded according
`to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria and
`by maximum grade
`using the Cochran Mantel
`analyzed
`H aenszel test
`
`Patient Population
`From November 2001 to November 2002 460 patients
`were enrolled onto the study and randomly assigned to
`treatment groups All patients were female 97 were white
`and 83 were postmenopausal The study population typ
`ically had more than three metastatic lesions 76 visceral
`lung abdominal or liver disease 79 prior chemo
`therapy 86 and progression after first line therapy for
`disease 59 No important between group
`metastatic
`differences were noted in demographic or other baseline
`Six patients 1 did not
`characteristics Table 1
`
`receive study drug the re
`maining 454 patients ABI007 n = 229 standard pacli
`
`therapy
`
`paclitaxel
`
`Efficacy
`Efficacy analyses were based on the ITT population
`The ORR was significantly greater
`for ABI007 than for
`for all patients 33 v 19 respectively
`standard paclitaxel
`P = 001 patients who received first line therapy 42 v
`27 respectively P = 029 patients who received second
`line or greater therapy 27 v 13 respectively P = 006
`and patients who had received prior anthracycline
`in either the adjuvantmetastatic setting 34 v 18 re
`spectively P = 002 or the metastatic setting only 27 v
`14 respectively P = 010 Table 2 Tumor response rate
`was also significantly higher for ABI007 than for standard
`in patients with visceral dominant lesions 34 v
`19 respectively P = 002 and in patients aged younger
`than 65 years 34 v 19 respectively P < 001 Table 2
`ORR also was greater for ABI007 compared with standard
`dominant
`in patients with nonvisceral
`34 v 19 respectively and in patients
`65 years old
`27 v 19 respectively but the results did not
`reach
`because of the small number of
`
`paclitaxel
`
`lesions
`
`statistical significance
`patients in these subsets
`Maximum responses occurred by cycle 3 in 91 of
`responders in the ABI007 group and in 81 of responders
`in the standard paclitaxel group For ORR no significant
`interaction with treatment effect was observed for the prog
`nostic factors assessed indicating that the treatment effect
`of ABI007 versus standard paclitaxel was consistent be
`tween the strata of these factors
`Median TTP was significantly longer with ABI007
`than with standard paclitaxel for all patients 230 v 169
`weeks respectively hazard ratio HR = 075 P = 006
`log rank test Fig 1 TTP was longer for patients who
`received first line therapy compared with other patients
`240 v 197 weeks respectively although the difference
`was not statistically significant TTP also was signifi
`cantly longer with ABI007 than with standard pacli
`taxel for patients who received study drug as second line
`therapy 209 v 161 weeks
`or greater
`respectively
`HR = 073 P = 020
`
`7796
`
`JOURNAL
`
`OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
`
`

`

`ABI007 Versus Paclitaxel
`
`in MBC
`
`Table 1 Demographic
`
`and Other Baseline Characteristics
`
`ABI007 n = 229
`
`Standard Paclitaxel n = 225
`
`No of
`Patients
`
`229
`
`199
`
`30
`
`221
`
`1
`
`3
`
`2
`
`1
`
`1
`
`225
`
`134
`
`81
`
`14
`
`189
`
`40
`
`531
`
`1018
`
`2679
`
`706
`
`1409
`
`42125
`
`100
`
`87
`
`13
`
`97
`<1
`
`1
`
`< 1
`<1
`<1
`
`59
`
`35
`
`6
`
`83
`
`17
`
`533
`
`1005
`
`3083
`
`694
`
`1238
`
`40105
`
`No of
`Patients
`
`225
`
`193
`
`32
`
`218
`
`5
`
`2
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`223
`
`138
`
`82
`
`5
`
`187
`
`38
`
`100
`
`86
`
`14
`
`97
`
`2
`< 1
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`61
`
`36
`
`2
`
`83
`
`17
`
`72
`
`Characteristic
`
`Sex female
`Age years
`Mean
`
`SD
`
`Range
`<65
`
`65
`
`Ethnicity
`
`White
`
`Black
`
`Hispanic
`
`South Asian
`
`Asian
`
`Other
`
`Body weight
`kg
`No of patients
`Mean
`
`SD
`
`Range
`ECOG status
`
`1
`
`0
`
`23
`
`Menopausal
`
`status
`
`Postmenopausal
`
`lesions
`
`Premenopausal
`No of
`>3
`23
`
`1
`
`Dominant metastatic organ site
`
`Liver
`
`Lung
`
`Only lymph nodes soft tissue andor breast
`
`Bone
`
`Abdominal
`
`Unknown
`
`Prior metastatic chemotherapy
`regimens
`0 study drug administered as first line therapy
`
`1
`
`2
`
`> 3
`
`Prior therapy
`
`Chemotherapy
`No
`
`Yes
`
`Anthracycline
`No
`
`Yes
`
`therapy
`
`Metastatic
`
`only
`
`180
`
`42
`
`7
`
`92
`
`74
`
`37
`
`13
`
`10
`
`3
`
`97
`
`94
`
`23
`
`15
`
`28
`
`201
`
`53
`
`176
`
`115
`
`79
`
`18
`
`3
`
`40
`
`32
`
`16
`
`6
`
`4
`
`1
`
`42
`
`41
`
`10
`
`7
`
`12
`
`88
`
`23
`
`77
`
`50
`
`163
`
`53
`
`9
`
`97
`
`79
`
`30
`
`13
`
`6
`
`0
`
`89
`
`96
`
`35
`
`5
`
`34
`
`191
`
`50
`
`175
`
`130
`
`24
`
`4
`
`43
`
`35
`
`13
`
`6
`
`3
`
`0
`
`40
`
`43
`
`16
`
`2
`
`15
`
`85
`
`22
`
`78
`
`58
`
`Abbreviations ECOG Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group SD standard deviation
`total 100 because of rounding
`Percentages may not
`
`At the time of these analyses October 2004 the me
`dian censoring time for overall patient survival was 103
`weeks for the ABI007 group and 101 weeks for the standard
`
`paclitaxel group There was a trend for greater median
`survival for all patients treated with ABI007 than with
`standard paclitaxel 650 v 557 weeks respectively
`
`wwwjcoorg
`
`7797
`
`

`

`Gradishar et al
`
`Table 2 Response Rates
`ABI007 260 mgm2
`
`No of
`PatientsTotal
`No of
`
`Patients
`
`76229
`
`4197
`
`35132
`
`60176
`
`31115
`
`59176
`
`95 Cl
`
`2709 to 3929
`
`3244 to 5210
`
`1898 to 3405
`
`2709 to 4109
`1885 to 3507
`
`2655 to 4050
`
`33
`
`42
`
`27
`
`34
`
`27
`
`34
`
`34
`
`Response
`
`Complete and partial
`
`response
`
`All patients
`
`First line therapy
`
`Second line or greater
`
`therapy
`
`Prior anthracycline
`therapy
`Adjuvant andor metastatic
`
`Metastatic
`
`only
`
`Dominant metastatic organ site
`
`Visceral
`
`Patients
`
`42225
`
`2489
`
`18136
`
`32175
`
`18130
`
`34182
`
`Standard Paclitaxel 175 mgm2
`No of
`PatientsTotal
`No of
`
`95 Cl
`
`P
`
`001
`
`029
`
`006
`
`002
`
`010
`
`002
`
`1358 to 2376
`
`1775 to 3619
`
`754 to 1893
`
`1256 to 2401
`791 to 1978
`
`1302 to 2434
`
`19
`
`27
`
`13
`
`18
`
`14
`
`19
`
`19
`
`Nonvisceral
`Age years
`<65
`
`65
`
`1750
`
`68199
`
`830
`
`Abbreviation NS not significant
`
`statistically
`
`2087 to 4713
`
`843
`
`697 to 3024
`
`NS
`
`34
`
`27
`
`2758 to 4076
`
`1084 to 4249
`
`36193
`
`632
`
`19
`
`19
`
`1316 to 2415
`
`523 to 3227
`
`< 001
`NS
`
`dose intensity 49
`group received an average paclitaxel
`greater than that received by patients in the standard pacli
`taxel group treatment compliance was high with 96 of
`receiving 90 of
`in the ABI007 group
`the
`patients
`protocol specified dose Similarly of the patients who re
`ceived standard paclitaxel at 175 mgm2 94 received 90
`the protocol specified dose Furthermore AE related
`infrequent 3 to 7 in both treatment arms with no
`dose reductions and dose delays were
`discontinuations
`
`noted
`
`between
`
`the
`
`of
`
`statistically
`
`significant
`
`differences
`
`P = 374 Fig 2A Although no difference in survival was
`observed in first line patients the difference was statisti
`in patients who received ABI007 com
`cally significant
`as second line or greater
`pared with standard paclitaxel
`therapy 564 v 467 weeks respectively HR = 073
`P = 024 Fig 2B
`
`Safety
`A11454 patients in the ITT population were included in
`the safety analysis Although the patients in the ABI007
`
`a61007 n=229
`224
`
`Paclitaxeln
`P 006
`
`100
`
`075
`
`050
`
`a6
`
`z Sta2
`
`025
`

`
`0
`
`8
`
`16
`
`24
`
`32
`
`40
`
`48
`
`56
`
`64
`
`72
`
`80
`
`88
`
`96 104
`
`112
`
`120
`
`Week
`
`Fig 1 Median time to disease progression
`
`groups Consistent with the safety data no differences in
`QOL were noted between the two treatment groups despite
`the higher dose administered to the ABI007 group Fig 3
`The incidence of hypersensitivity reactions any grade
`was low for both arms < 1 for ABI007 and 2 for
`standard paclitaxel No severe grade 3 or 4 treatment
`the
`related hypersensitivity reactions occurred in any of
`patients in the ABI007 group despite the absence of pre
`medication In contrast grade 3 hypersensitivity reactions
`occurred in the standard paclitaxel group despite standard
`premedication chest pain two patients allergic reaction
`three patients Per protocol corticosteroids and antihista
`mines were not administered routinely to patients in the
`ABI007 group however premedication was administered
`for emesis myalgiaarthralgia or anorexia in 18 patients
`
`8 in the ABI007 group in 2 of the treatment cycles
`whereas 224 patients > 99 in the standard paclitaxel
`group received premedication in 95 of the cycles
`The most frequently reported AEs all grades are pre
`sented in Figure 4A and treatment related grade 3 and 4
`AEs are presented in Figure 4B Despite the higher dose of
`paclitaxel administered to patients in the ABT007 group
`the incidence of
`treatment related grade 4 neutropenia
`
`1198
`
`JOURNAL
`
`OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
`
`

`

`ABI007 Versus Paclitaxel
`
`in MBC
`
`ABI007 n = 229
`Pactitaxel n = 225 B
`p= 374
`
`ABI007 = 131
`Paclitaxel n = 136
`P 024
`
`I CO
`
`A
`
`075
`
`cf
`
`5 050
`
`2
`
`026
`
`8
`
`16
`
`24
`
`32
`
`40 48
`
`56 64 72
`
`80 88 N 104
`
`20 128 136
`
`144
`
`16
`
`24
`
`32
`
`40 48
`
`56
`
`64
`
`72
`
`80 88
`
`96
`
`104
`
`112 120 128 136 144
`
`Week
`
`Week
`
`Fig 2 A Patient survival over time B Patient survival over
`time from first dose of study drug to date of death
`
`indicates
`
`time in patients who received second line or greater
`
`therapy P values from log rank test Survival
`
`laboratory test values was signifi
`based on the central
`cantly lower in the ABI007 group than in the standard
`paclitaxel group 20 of 226 patients 9 v48 of 222 patients
`22 respectively P < 001 with a higher mean neutrophil
`nadir 167 v 131 X 1091L respectively P = 046 suggest
`ing that polyethylated castor oil may have contributed to
`this toxicity in patients who received standard paclitaxel
`
`Final
`
`Evaluation
`
`Follow Up
`
`Fig 3 Quality of life measurements European Organisation
`for Research
`of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 for patients
`and Treatment
`receiving ABI007 or standard paclitaxel SD standard deviation
`
`Febrile neutropenia was uncommon < 2 in both study
`arms and no septic deaths occurred Eight patients 3 in
`the ABI007 group and 14 patients 6 in the standard
`
`treatment for neu
`
`paclitaxel group received growth factor
`tropenia or leukopenia during the study
`As expected with a higher dose of paclitaxel treatment
`related grade 3 sensory neuropathy occurred more fre
`quently in the ABI007 arm than in the standard paclitaxel
`
`arm 24 patients 10 v five patients 2 respectively
`P < 001 Fig 4B however these episodes improved with
`in a median 22
`interruption of treatment to grade 2 or 1
`days and were easily managed with treatment interruption
`and dose reduction Fig 5 By day 28 after its first occur
`rence the number of patients with persistent grade 3 sen
`sory neuropathy was the same n = 4 in both study arms
`No episodes of motor neuropathy or grade 4 sensory neu
`ropathywere reported in either group and no differences in
`physician or patient grading of peripheral neuropathy were
`observed between the two groups when these parameters
`were analyzed on the basis of total paclitaxel dose adminis
`tered The only clinical chemistry value that was notably
`different between the two treatment arms was higher serum
`glucose levels in the standard paclitaxeltreated patients
`who also had a higher incidence of hyperglycemia reported
`as an AE compared with ABI007treated patients 15 pa
`
`tients 7 v three patients 1 respectively P = 003
`
`wwwjcoorg
`
`7799
`
`

`

`Gradishar et al
`
`100
`
`A so
`
`o
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`0
`
`50
`
`40
`
`7 30
`
`20a
`
`10
`
`ii
`
`III
`
`c1
`
`<43
`
`1 A8I007 260 mom2
`175 m0irn2
`
`Paclitaxel
`
`I I
`
`cr
`
`I
`
`V
`
`sts
`
`ABI007 Grade 3
`A6I007 Grade 4
`
`JFaciitaxei Grade 3
`
`EPactItaxel Grade 4
`
`s2ee6
`
`Ng
`
`s
`CP
`
`0
`
`e
`
`i
`
`t
`
`e
`
`o
`
`C>
`
`cfP
`
`ce
`
`ce
`
`ri
`IL
`0 A
`0
`
`64
`
`in either
`
`treatment
`
`neutrophil
`
`Fig 4 A Adverse events all grades reported in more than 20 of patients
`count B Treatment
`group ANC absolute
`related grade 3 and 4 adverse events reported in 5 of
`patients in either
`P< 05 CochranMantel
`
`group Data are based on adverse event reporting
`test GGT gamma glutamyl
`Haenszel
`transferase
`
`Subgroup analyses revealed that the safety profiles of
`in patients who received
`ABI007 and standard paclitaxel
`the drugs as first line therapy were similar to those in the
`
`1 00
`
`075 I
`
`0 50
`
`0
`
`25
`
`g
`
`z
`
`2o
`
`Median = 22 days 95 CI 17 to 22
`
`10
`
`20
`
`30
`
`40
`
`50
`
`60
`
`70
`
`80
`
`90
`
`100
`
`Days From Grade 3 to Improvement
`
`to Grade 1 or 2
`
`Fig 5 Time to improvement in ABI007treated
`Censored
`grade 3 peripheral neuropathy
`
`patients who developed
`
`overall study population In subgroup analyses by age the
`reported AEs were similar in patients less than 65 years old
`65 years old in both groups Of the patients
`and patients
`65 years old the incidences of the following AEs were
`notably lower in the ABI007 group than in the standard
`paclitaxel group neutropenia 23 v 59 respectively
`leukopenia 10 v31 respectively nausea 20 v38
`respectively hyperglycemia 0 v 19 respectively and
`flushing 0 v 16 respectively These data indicate no
`Six patients 3 in the ABI007 group and eight pa
`tients 4 in the standard paclitaxel group died during the
`< 1 in the standard paclitaxel group died of multiorgan
`
`study all as a result of disease progression No treatment
`related deaths occurred in the ABI007 group one patient
`
`failure which was considered by the investigator to be pos
`sibly related to treatment but may also have been a result of
`sepsis andor progressive disease
`
`additional safety concerns for ABI007 in patients
`years old compared with younger patients
`
`65
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`In this large international phase III study ABI007 a novel
`130 nanometer albumin bound paclitaxel particle was su
`for both ORR and TTP in all
`perior to standard paclitaxel
`patients with MBC The ABI007 dose used in this study
`50 higher than the dose delivered with solvent based
`
`could be administered safely over 30 minutes
`paclitaxel
`without premedication Paclitaxel particles were well toler
`ated requiring minimal dose modification for AEs and no
`severe hypersensitivity reactions to ABI007 occurred de
`spite the absence of corticosteroid premedication
`The robustness of the efficacy data is underscored by
`finding of greater tumor response to ABI007
`the consistent
`in subgroup analyses The ORR
`than to standard paclitaxel
`of ABI007 was superior
`for all patients patients who
`received study drug as first line therapy patients who re
`ceived study drug as second line or greater therapy patients
`exposure elderly patients and
`with prior anthracycline
`patients with poor prognostic factors including visceral
`tumor involvement Median TTP for all patients was
`in the ABI007 group than in the
`standard paclitaxel group P = 006 Patients receiving
`ABI007 as second line or greater therapy whose clinical
`course would be less affected by subsequent
`therapies
`had significantly prolonged survival with the risk for
`death being reduced by 28
`
`significantly longer
`
`Preclinical models demonstrated increased antitumor
`
`activity and higher intratumor paclitaxel concentrations
`for
`ABI007 compared with equal doses of standard paclitax
`e116 In addition ABI007 was less toxic than standard pac
`of 50 higher
`litaxel permitting the administration
`doses These two factors of higher intratumor paclitaxel
`
`1800
`
`JOURNAL
`
`OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
`
`

`

`ABI007 Versus Paclitaxel
`
`in MBC
`
`concentrations and higher dose administered may ex
`plain the increased antitumor activity demonstrated for
`in this ran
`ABI007 compared with standard paclitaxel
`domized study
`The findings of improved efficacy with high doses of
`albumin bound paclitaxel ABI007 in patients with MBC
`to the recently reported failure of high doses
`are in contrast
`of polyethylated castor oilbased paclitaxel standard pac
`to improve outcome in similar patients In a large
`litaxel
`study conducted by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B
`CALGB8 the response rates for first or second line pa
`tients treated with standard paclitaxel
`175 210 or 250
`mgm2 administered as a 3 hour infusion every 3 weeks
`were 23 26 and 21 respectively By contrast
`tumor
`response with ABI007 260 mgm2 was significantly greater
`than that achieved with standard paclitaxel 175 mgm2
`33 v 19 respectively P = 001 Similarly TTP
`which was comparable for standard paclitaxel 175 mgm2
`in both the CALGB trial and the present study 170 and
`161 weeks respectively improved significantly with
`ABI007 P = 03 but not with standard paclitaxel 250
`mgm2 P = 12
`The failure of higher doses of solvent based paclitaxel
`to improve outcome may not reflect on paclitaxel per se but
`rather on the increasing concentrations of the polyethylated
`castor oil vehicle which is known to entrap paclitaxel
`in
`micelles thereby limiting bioavailability and antitumor
`2° Results of the present study indicate that
`activity3617
`such limitations may be overcome by the use of albumin
`bound paclitaxel
`There may also be a fundamental difference between
`ABI007 and standard paclitaxel with respect
`to albumin
`drug transport and binding of
`the
`receptormediated
`albumin drug complex to proteins expressed in tumor
`tissue Albuminbound macromolecules
`can leave the cir
`and accu
`culation through leaky tumor microvasculature
`the enhanced
`mulate in the interstitium because
`of
`
`permeation and retention effects characteristic of neopla
`sia21 In addition albumin is actively transported across
`microvessel
`endothelial
`cells via
`a unique receptor
`mediated transport mechanism using the gp60 receptor22
`Binding of albumin to its gp60 receptor on endothelial cells
`activates caveolin1 which leads to the formation of vesicles
`the albumin drug complex and
`caveolae that transport
`other
`across the endothelial cells
`fluid phase components
`and into the tumor interstitium1022 25 We have
`demonstrated in vitro that polyethylated castor oil
`SPARC secreted protein
`this transport mechanism26
`acidic and rich in cysteine another albumin binding pro
`tein expressed by tumor cells and secreted into the tumor
`interstitium is known to be overexpressed in breast can
`cer27 and has been implicated in tumor progression and
`angiogenesis28 SPARC overexpression may account
`
`for
`
`recently
`
`inhibits
`
`preferential accumulation of the albumin drug complex at
`sites of tumor29
`Despite a 50 increase in the dose of paclitaxel pa
`tients treated with ABI007 experienced significantly less
`neutropenia P < 001 Polyethylated castor oil
`is believed
`to contribute to taxaneassociated myelosuppression by in
`hibiting MDR1 Pglycoprotein in hematopoietic progeni
`low volume of distribution
`of
`tor cells3° Because
`
`its
`
`remains within the vasculature
`
`polyethylated castor oil
`compartment in continuous contact with bone marrow and
`may enhance myelosuppression while having less effect on
`MDR1 in tumor tissues3°
`In the CALGB tria18 the incidence and severity of my
`elosuppression were markedly increased with the higher
`In contrast with ABI007 260
`doses of standard paclitaxel
`mgm2 the incidence of grade 4 neutropenia was markedly
`
`lower than that expected with high dose paclitaxel 9 for
`ABI007 v 53 for standard paclitaxel
`250 mgm2 in the
`CALGB trial ABI007induced neutropenia also was sub
`stantially less frequent and less severe than that reported for
`In one study31 more than 90
`solvent based docetaxe1231
`of patients treated with docetaxel 100 mgm2 experienced
`severe neutropenia clinical consequences included febrile
`neutropenia 12°0 of patients and septic death 15 of
`it seems that ABI007 causes
`patients2 Taken together
`substantially less myelosuppression than the solvent
`based taxanes
`Sensory and motor neuropathy are wellrecognized
`34 The incidence of grade 3
`AEs of solvent based taxanes332
`sensory neuropathy was higher with ABI007 260 mgm2
`than with standard paclitaxel
`spectively However this incidence was substantially lower
`250 mgm2 in
`than that reported with standard paclitaxel
`the CALGB trial 32 grade 3 sensory neuropathy8
`
`175 mgm2 10 v 2 re
`
`castor oil has been shown to cause axonal
`Polyethylated
`degeneration and demyelination that can lead to prolonged
`37 As a
`sometimes irreversible sensory neuropathy3235
`class effect peripheral neuropathy would be expected to
`occur with solvent free paclitaxel however without
`the
`damage induced by polyethylated castor oil neuropathy
`might resolve more rapidly Indeed with ABI007 sensory
`neuropathy improved rapidly median 22 days from grade
`3 to lower grades with treatment interruption
`Other well recognized taxaneassociated AEs eg myal
`gia and arthralgia typically were selflimited treated with
`and resolved without dose modification or
`acetaminophen
`interruption Similar to the experience with ABI007 in phase
`trials1338 nail changes excessive fluid retentio

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket