throbber
British Journal of Cancer 2005 92 12401246
`0 2005 Cancer Research UK
`rights reserved 0007 092005
`$3000
`
`All
`
`wwwbjcancercom
`
`NKI 05 a paclitaxelincorporating micellar nanoparticle
`formulation can extend in vivo antitumour activity and reduce the
`neurotoxicity of paclitaxel
`
`I
`
`T Hamaguchi I Y Matsumura2 M Suzuki3 K Shimizu3 R Goda3 I Nakamura3 I Nakatomi4 M Yokoyamas
`K Kataoka6 and T Kakizoe7
`Department of Medicine President of National Cancer Center 511 Tsukiji Chuoku Tokyo 1040045 Japan 2Investigative Treatment Division
`National Cancer Center Research Institute East 651 Kashiwanoha
`Kashiwa Chiba 2778577 Japan 3Pharmaceuticals Group Research
`Division Nippon Kayaku Co Ltd 33112 Shimo Kitaku Tokyo 1158588 Japan 4NanoCarrier Co Ltd Tokatsu Techno Plaza 546
`KSP Bldg East 404 321 Sakado Takatsuku
`Kashiwa Chiba 2770882 Japan 5Kanagawa Academy of Science and Technology
`Kashiwanoha
`The University of Tokyo 731 Hongo
`Kawasaki Kanagawa 2130012 Japan 6Departrnent
`of Materials Engineering Graduate School of Engineering
`Bunkyoku Tokyo 1138656 Japan 7President of National Cancer Center 5I I Tsukiji Chuoku Tokyo 1040045 Japan
`
`Development
`
`Paclitaxel PTX is one of the most effective anticancer agents In clinical practice however high incidences of adverse reactions of
`the drug for example neurotoxicity myelosuppression and allergic reactions have been reported NKI05 a micellar nanoparticle
`to overcome these problems and to enhance the antitumour activity of PTX Via the self association
`formulation was developed
`process PTX was incorporated
`into the inner core of the micelle system by physical entrapment through hydrophobic interactions
`between the drug and the well designed block copolymers for PTX NKI05 was compared with free PTX with respect
`to their in
`vitro cytotoxicity in vivo antitumour activity pharmacokinetics
`and neurotoxicity Consequently the plasma area
`pharmacodynamics
`the curve AUC values were approximately 90 fold higher
`for NK I 05 than for free PTX because the leakage of PTX from
`under
`normal blood vessels was minimal and its capture by the reticuloendothelial system minimised Thus the tumour AUC value was 25
`fold higher for NK105 than for free PTX NKI05 showed
`significantly potent antitumour activity on a human colorectal
`line HT 29 xenograft as compared with PTX P <0001 because the enhanced accumulation of the drug in the tumour has occurred
`and sustained release from micellar nanoparticles Neurotoxicity was significantly weaker with
`probably followed by its effective
`NKI05 than with free PTX The neurotoxicity of PTX was attenuated
`by NKI05 which was demonstrated by both histopathological
`P <0001 and physiological P <005 methods for the first
`time The present study suggests that NKI05 warrants a clinical
`solid tumours
`patients with metastatic
`British Journal of Cancer 2005 92 1240 I 246 do i101038sjbjc6602479
`Published online 22 March 2005
`D 2005 Cancer Research UK
`
`cancer cell
`
`trial
`
`for
`
`wwwbjcancercom
`
`Keywords NKI 05 pachtaxel polymer micelles DDS ERR effect
`
`Paclitaxel PTX is one of the most useful anticancer
`agents known
`including ovarian breast and lung cancers
`for various cancers
`Carney 1996 Khayat et al 2000 However PTX has serious
`adverse effects for example neutropenia and peripheral sensory
`neuropathy In addition anaphylaxis and other severe hypersensi
`
`tive reactions have been reported to develop in 24 of patients
`
`receiving the drug even after premedication with antiallergic
`agents these adverse reactions have been attributed to the mixture
`of Cremophor EL and ethanol which was used to solubilise PTX
`Weiss et al 1990 Rowinsky and Donehower 1995 Of the adverse
`reactions neutropenia can be prevented or managed effectively by
`
`Correspondence Dr Y Matsumura
`Treatment Division
`Institute East 651 Kashiwanoha
`National Cancer Center Research
`Kashiwa Chiba 2778577 Japan Email yhmatsumeastnccgojp
`27 October 2004 revised 26 January 2005
`Received
`January 2005 published online 22 March 2005
`
`accepted
`
`31
`
`Investigative
`
`a granulocyte colony stimulating factor On the
`administering
`other hand there are no effective
`therapies to prevent or reduce
`nerve damage which is associated with peripheral neuropathy
`caused by PTX therefore neurotoxicity
`constitutes a significant
`dose limiting toxicity of
`drug Rowinsky
`et al
`1993
`the
`Wasserheit et al 1996
`The above problems of PTX have been attributed to its low
`and limited efficacy due to the nonselective
`therapeutic indices
`nature of its therapeutic targets
`and its inability to accumulate
`in cancer
`tissue Therefore there is an urgent need to
`selectively
`develop modalities by which cytotoxic drugs can selectively
`target
`tumour tissue and effectively act on cancer cells in the scene The
`roles of drug delivery systems DDSs have drawn attention in this
`context Drug delivery systems are based on two main principles
`active and passive targetings The former refers to the development
`tumour related mole
`of monoclonal antibodies directed against
`cules that allow targeting of the tumour because of specific binding
`between the antibody and its antigen However
`the application of
`
`Abraxis EX2009
`Actavis LLC v Abraxis Bioscience LLC
`1PR201701101 1PR201701103 1PR201701104
`
`

`

`antibodies
`
`is
`
`restricted to tumours
`
`Several
`
`DDSs using monoclonal
`expressing high levels of related antigens
`Passive targeting is based on the socalled enhanced perme
`ability and retention EPR effect Matsumura and Maeda 1986
`Maeda et al 2000 The EPR effect consists
`in the pathophysio
`logical characteristics of solid tumour
`tissue hypervascularity
`secretion of vascular perme
`incomplete vascular
`architecture
`ability factors stimulating extravasation within cancer
`tissue and
`absence
`drainage from tumours
`of effective
`that
`lymphatic
`impedes the efficient clearance of macromolecules accumulated
`in solid tumour
`tissues
`to maximally use the EPR effect have been
`techniques
`is modification
`of drug structures and develop
`developed that
`ment of drug carriers The first micelle forming polymeric drug
`glycol PEGpolyaspartate block
`was polyethylene
`developed
`copolymer conjugated with doxorubicin DXR Yokoyama et al
`et al 1993 PEG constituted
`1990 Yokoyama et al 1991 Kataoka
`the outer shell of the micelle which conferred a stealth property on
`the drug that allowed
`the micellar drug preparations to be less
`avidly taken up by the reticuloendothelial system RES and to be
`retained in the circulation for a longer time Prolonged circulation
`time and the ability of polymeric micelles to extravasate
`through
`tumour
`were
`vasculature
`to result
`the leaky
`in the
`expected
`accumulation of DXR in tumour
`tissue due to the EPR effect
`Kwon et al 1994 Yokoyama et al 1999 A clinical
`trail of
`micellar DXR NK911 is now underway Nakanishi
`et al 2001
`Hamaguchi et al 2003 Recently we succeeded in constructing
`system for PTX which
`NK105
`a polymeric micelle carrier
`conferred on PTX a passive targeting ability based on the EPR
`we
`details and
`effect
`In the
`describe
`the
`paper
`present
`of NK105 We also discuss
`NK105 and other DDS formulations containing PTX
`
`characteristics
`
`differences
`
`between
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Materials
`
`PTX was purchased
`from Mercian Corp Tokyo Japan All other
`lines MKN45
`chemicals were of reagent grade Following cell
`MKN28 HT 29 DLD1 HCT116 TE1 TE8 PC 14 PC14TXT
`H460 MCAS OVCAR3 AsPC1 PAN 9 PAN 3 and MCF7 cells
`were purchased from American Type Culture Collection Colon 26
`from the Japan Foundation for Cancer
`cells were
`dispensed
`Japan Female BALBc
`Research Tokyo
`nunu mice were
`from SLC Shizuoka Japan Female CDF1 mice and
`purchased
`IGS rats were purchased
`from Charles River Japan Inc Kanagawa
`Japan
`All animal procedures were performed in compliance with the
`guidelines for the care and use of experimental animals which had
`been drawn up by the Committee for Animal Experimentation of
`the National Cancer Center
`these guidelines meet
`the ethical
`standards
`required by law and also comply with the guidelines for
`the use of experimental animals in Japan
`
`NK105 a PTXincorporating micellar nanoparticle
`formulation
`
`NK105 is a PTXincorporating
`core shell type polymeric micellar
`formulation Polymeric micellar
`particles were
`nanoparticle
`the selfassociation
`formed by facilitating
`block
`of amphiphilic
`copolymers in an aqueous medium Novel
`block
`amphiphilic
`namely NK105 polymers were
`for PTX
`copolymers
`designed
`entrapment NK105 polymers were constructed
`using PEG as the
`and modified polyaspartate as the hydro
`hydrophilic
`segment
`phobic segment Carboxylic groups of polyaspartate block were
`modified with 4phenyl1butanol
`by esterification
`reaction
`the half of the groups were converted
`to 4 phenyl
`
`consequently
`
`A paclitaxelincorporating micellar nanoparticle
`T Hamaguchi et al
`
`1butanolate Via the selfassociation process PTX was incorpo
`the micelle system by physical
`rated into the inner
`core of
`through hydrophobic interactions between
`the drug
`entrapment
`and specifically well designed block copolymers for PTX
`
`1 24 1
`
`Pharmacolcinetics
`NK105
`
`and pharmacodynamics of PTX and
`
`Colon 26 tumour bearing CDF1 mice aged 8 weeks were given
`intravenously iv via the tail vein PTX 50 and 100 mg kg or
`NK105 at corresponding PTXequivalent doses Mice were killed at
`5 and 30 min as well as 2 6 24 and 72 h after injection Blood was
`removed
`and
`plasma and
`tumours were
`tumours
`collected
`obtained were then stored at 20°C until
`the analysis Each time
`for collection represented three samples from three different
`point
`mice PTX was extracted from plasma obtained by deproteinisation
`followed by liquid liquid extraction with
`using acetonitrile
`tbutylmethylether Tumours
`obtained were
`homogenised in
`05 acetic acid and the resultant homogenate was deproteinised
`to the same method as that used for
`and extracted
`according
`plasma The blood and tumour extracts were analysed for PTX by
`mass
`spectrometry Reversed
`liquid chromatographytandem
`phase column switching
`chromatography was conducted
`using
`an ODS column and
`was
`enabled
`by electrospray
`detection
`of positive mode
`The mean plasma and
`tumour
`ionisation
`concentrations of PTX at each sampling point were calculated
`for both PTX
`and NK105 Pharmacokinetic modelling was
`completed using a WinNonlin
`Standard software
`version 31
`Pharsight Corp California USA
`
`In vitro cytotoxicity
`
`Various human cancer cell
`lines were evaluated
`in the present
`study The cell
`lines were maintained in monolayer cultures in
`
`Dulbeccos modified Eagles medium containing 10 vv foetal
`calf serum and 600 mg11 glutamine WST8 Cell Counting Kit8
`Dojindo Kumamoto
`Japan was used for
`the cell proliferation
`line in 90 tl of culture medium
`assay In all 2000 cells of each cell
`were plated in 96 well plates and were then incubated for 24 h at
`37°C Serial dilutions of PTX or NK105 in a volume of 10 u1 were
`added and the cells were incubated for 48 or 72 h All data were
`expressed as mean+ se of triplicate cultures The data were then
`plotted as a percentage of the data from the control cultures which
`were treated identically to the experimental cultures except
`that
`no drug was added
`
`Evaluation of the antitumour activity of PTX and NK105
`
`cells
`
`inoculated
`
`at
`
`a
`
`The antitumour activity of PTX and NK105 was evaluated using
`nude mice implanted with a human colonic cancer cell line HT 29
`of HT 29 were
`One million tumour
`subcutaneous sc site on the back skin of BALBc female nude
`mice aged 6 weeks When
`tumour
`size reached
`approximately
`58 mm in diameter mice were randomly allocated
`to the PTX
`group NK105 administration group and control
`administration
`administration group each of which was made up of five animals
`free PTX group
`Each
`treatment was carried out
`follows
`as
`100 mg kg NK105
`was administered at a dose of 25 50 or
`group was with same PTXequivalent doses and in control group
`animals were given saline Mice were administered a single iv
`injection of PTX or NK105 weekly for 3 weeks The antitumour
`activity of PTX and NK105 was evaluated by measuring tumour
`size a x b where a is the major diameter and b is the minor
`diameter at various time points after injection Changes in body
`weight were also monitored for mice which were used in the
`
`present study
`
`© 2005 Cancer Research UK
`
`BUtish Journal of Cancer 2005 927 1240 1246
`
`

`

`N
`
`Modified polyaspartate
`
`(hydrophilic segment)
`
`(hydrophobic segment) Polyethylene glycol
`
`Micelle formation
`and
`
`PTX entrapment oO
`
`o
`
`A paclitaxel-incorporating micellar nanoparticle
`e T Hamaguchi et af
`
`1242
`
`Evaluation of neurotoxicity
`
`The severity of neurotoxicity was assessed both electrophysiolo-
`gically and histologically. Under intraperitoneal ketamine anaes-
`thesia (40 mgkg™'), rats were given a single iv. injection of PTX
`(7.5mgkg~'), NK105 (a PTX-equivalent dose of 7.5mgkg~'), or
`5% glucose weekly for 6 weeks. All the solutions were administered
`through the jugular vein exposed via a small incision in the neck.
`Electrophysiological measurements were conducted 1 day before
`the first dosing and on day 6 after
`the final dosing. For
`electrophysiological
`recording,
`rats were anaesthetised by the
`intraperitoneal
`injection of pentobarbital 40mgkg'. Electrical
`stimuli were given peripherally, and caudal sensory nerve action
`potentials (caudal SNAPs) were recorded centrally from the tail.
`The amplitude of each waveform wascalculated by measuring the
`caudal SNAP from the top peak to the bottom peak. Variations in
`the amplitude after the 6th weekly administration of the solutions
`were determined.
`Forlight microscopy, rats were killed after electrophysiological
`recordings. Subsequently, a segment of the sciatic nerve was
`carefully removed, and embedded in paraffin. Sections (2 um
`thick) were stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H & E) before
`examination under light microscopy to evaluate the degenerative
`changes of myelinated nerve fibres.
`
`Statistical analysis
`
`The data of therapeutic efficacy was expressed as mean+s.e.m.
`The statistical significance of differences in therapeutic efficacy
`between two administration groups was calculated by means of
`repeated measures (analysis of variance). The statistical signifi-
`cance of the differences in neurotoxic activity between two
`administration groups was calculated using the Student’s t-test
`on the closed testing procedure. The histopathological impairment
`was scored in five grades. The statistical significance of the
`differences in histopathological impairment between two admin-
`istration groups was calculated using the Wilcoxon’s rank-sum test
`on the closed testing procedure. All data were calculated with
`software StatView, version 5 (ABACUS Concepts, Berkeley, CA,
`USA). A value of P<0.05 was consideredstatistically significant.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Preparation and characterisation of NK105
`
`
`
`Polyethylene glycol
`Inner core
`with high hydrophobicity
`
`B
`
`3
`
`10
`
`32
`
`101
`
`320
`
`1013
`
`Particle size (nm)
`
`Preparation and characterisation of NKI05. (A) The micellar
`Figure |
`structure of NKI95 PTX was incorporated into the inner core of the
`micelle. (B) The size distribution of NK105 measured by the dynamiclight
`scattering method. The mean diameter of an NKIO5 micelle was 85 nm.
`
`To construct NK105 micellar nanoparticles (Figure 1A), block
`copolymers consisting of PEG and polyaspartate, the so-called PEG
`polyaspartate described previously (9, 11, 13, 14), were used. PTX
`was incorporated into polymeric micelles formed by physical
`entrapmentutilising hydrophobic interactions between PTX and
`the block copolymer polyaspartate chain. After screening of many
`candidate substances, 4-phenyl-1-butanol was employed for the
`chemical modification of the polyaspartate block to increase its
`hydrophobicity. Treating with a condensing agent, 1,3-diisopro-
`pylcarbodiimide, the half of carboxyl groups on the polyaspartate,
`Colon 26-bearing CDF1 mice were given a single iv. injection of
`was esterified with 4-phenyl-1-butanol. Molecular weight of the
`PTX 50 or 100 mg kg", or of NK105at an equivalent dose of PTX.
`polymers was determined to be approximately 20000 (PEG block:
`Subsequently, the time-course changes in the plasma and tumour
`12000; modified polyaspartate block: 8000). NK105 was prepared
`levels of PTX were determined in the PTX and NK105 adminis-
`by facilitating the self-association of NK105 polymers and PTX.
`NK105 was obtained as a freeze-dried formulation and contained
`tration groups
`(Figure 2);
`furthermore,
`the pharmacokinetic
`ca. 23% (ww') of PTX, as determined by reversed-phase liquid
`parameters of each group were also determined (Table 1).
`chromatography using an ODS column with mobile phase
`NK105 exhibited slower clearance from the plasma than PTX,
`consisting of acetonitrile and water (9:11, vv) and detection
`while NK105 was present
`in the plasma for up to 72h after
`injection; PTX was not detected after 24h or later of injection. The
`of ultraviolet absorbance at 227nm. Finally, NK105, a PTX-
`incorporating polymeric micellar nanoparticle formulation with a
`plasma concentration at 5min (Cs min) and the area under the
`
`single and narrow size distribution, was obtained. The weight- curve (AUC) of NK105 were 11-20-fold and 50-86-fold higher for
`average diameter of the nanoparticles was approximately 85nm
`NK105 than for PTX, respectively. Furthermore, the half-life at the
`ranging from 20 to 430 nm (Figure 1B).
`terminal phase (t)2z) was 4-6 times longer for NK105 than for
`
`Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of NK105
`
`British Journal of Cancer (2005) 92(7), 1240-1246
`
`© 2005 Cancer Research UK
`
`

`

`A paclitaxelincorporating micellar nanoparticle
`T Hamaguchi et el
`
`1243
`
`superior
`
`In vivo antitumour activity
`BALBc mice bearing sc HT 29 colon
`cancer
`tumours showed
`of PTX
`decreased
`tumour growth rates after the administration
`and NK105 However NK105
`antitumour
`exhibited
`activity as compared with PTX P< 0001 The antitumour activity
`dose of 25 mgkg was
`of NK105 administered at a PTXequivalent
`comparable to that obtained after the administration of free PTX
`100 mg kg Tumour suppression by NK105 increased in a dose
`dependent manner Tumours disappeared after the first dosing to
`dose of 100 mg kg
`mice treated with NK105 at a PTXequivalent
`and all mice remained tumourfree thereafter Figure 3A In
`loss was induced in mice which were given
`addition less weight
`NK105 100 mg kg than in those that were given the same dose of
`free PTX Figure 3B
`
`Table 2
`
`IC50 values ttm of PTX and NK I 05 in various cell
`
`lines
`
`48h
`
`72h
`
`Cancer
`
`Cell line
`
`NKI 05
`
`PTX
`
`NKI 05
`
`PTX
`
`Oesophageal
`
`cancer
`
`Lung cancer
`
`Breast cancer
`
`Stomach cancer
`
`Colon cancer
`
`TE1
`TE8
`
`PCI4
`PC14TXT
`H460
`
`MCF7
`MKN28
`MKN45
`
`DLD I
`HT 29
`HCT I 16
`
`>10
`002
`
`001
`015
`ND
`
`>10
`003
`002
`
`095
`
`001
`ND
`
`>10
`002
`
`001
`009
`ND
`
`>10
`003
`007
`
`026
`
`001
`ND
`
`001
`
`001
`
`001
`008
`003
`
`001
`
`001
`
`001
`
`029
`
`001
`003
`
`002
`
`001
`
`001
`006
`
`001
`
`001
`
`021
`002
`
`020
`
`001
`
`001
`
`PTX The maximum concentration Cm and AUG of NK105 in
`Colon 26 tumours were approximately 3 and 25 times higher for
`NK105 than for PTX respectively NK105 continued to accumulate
`tumour PTX
`tumours until
`72 h after
`injection The
`in the
`concentration was higher than 10 itg g1 even at 72 h after the iv
`50 and 100 mgkg1 On the contrary
`injection of NK105
`the
`tumour PTX concentrations at 72 h after the iv administration of
`free PTX 50 and 100 mgkg1 were below detection
`limits and less
`than 01 itgg1 respectively
`
`In vitro cytotoxicity
`
`NK105 was tested on 12 human tumour
`lines derived from
`colon breast and ovarian tumours
`lung gastric
`oesophagus
`Similar dose response curves were noted for PTX and NK105
`data not shown Furthermore the IC50 values of NK105 were
`similar to those of PTX at 48 and 72 h indicating that both NK105
`cytotoxic activity in vitro Table 2
`and PTX showed equivalent
`
`cell
`
`10 000
`
`1000
`
`100
`
`10
`
`1
`
`01
`
`001
`
`0001
`
`A
`
`10000
`
`E woo
`L 100
`7
`
`10
`
`o
`
`1
`
`01 l
`
`X
`
`001
`
`0001
`
`ca
`
`a 8
`
`0
`
`0
`
`12 24 36 48 60 72
`
`0
`
`12 24 36 48 60 72
`
`Time after administration h
`Plasma and tumour concentrations of PTX after
`single iv
`Figure 2
`administration of NKI05 or PTX to Colon 26 bearing CDF I mice Plasma
`A and tumour B concentrations of PTX after NK I 05 administration at
`NK I 05 at a PTXequivalent
`dose of I 00 mg kg A PTX 50 mg kg I 0 and PTX I 00 mg kg I A
`dose of 50 mg kr I
`
`a PTXequivalent
`
`Ovarian cancer
`
`Pancreatic cancer
`
`MCAS
`OVCAR3
`
`AsPC1
`PAN 9
`PAN 3
`
`001
`>10
`
`001
`>10
`
`001
`>10
`
`001
`>10
`
`ND
`ND
`ND
`
`ND
`ND
`ND
`
`002
`003
`0010
`
`002
`002
`0004
`
`PTX= paclitaxel ND = not done
`
`Pharmacokinetic parameters for the plasma and tumour concentrations of paclitaxel
`Table I
`26 bearing CDF I mice
`Dose mg kg C51 g
`
`Treatment
`
`i2z h AUC0 Gig h m11
`
`t
`
`AUCoinf µg h m11
`
`CLtht ml h kg 1
`
`c ml kg I
`
`after
`
`single iv administration of NKI05 and PTX =o Colon
`
`50
`
`100
`
`50
`
`100
`
`50
`
`100
`
`50
`
`100
`
`5932
`15767
`
`115703
`
`181237
`
`098
`184
`599
`682
`
`C
`
`Gig m11
`
`T h
`
`902
`3090b
`
`78609c
`
`155657c
`
`ti h
`
`913
`3090
`78623
`155736
`
`5476
`3236
`64
`64
`
`6846
`8122
`464
`548
`
`AUC0gh m11
`
`AUCoinf µg h m11
`
`1250
`
`20
`
`702
`
`1208b
`
`1330
`
`2857
`4245
`7109
`
`05
`240
`60
`
`806
`3507
`7366
`
`3304c
`23601
`38849
`
`3310
`31920
`79645
`
`the terminal phase AUC= area under the curve CLtot =total body clearance V volume of
`at steady state T =time of maximum concentration FIX= paclitaxel Parameters were calculated
`
`Plasma
`
`NKI 05
`NKI 05
`
`Tumour
`
`NKI 05
`NKI05
`
`distribution
`
`iv= intravenous
`
`C5 rnIn = plasma concentration
`
`at 5 min t112z= halflife at
`
`noncompartmental
`
`analysis AUC061 bAUCo24h AUCo721
`
`© 2005 Cancer Research UK
`
`British Journal of Cancer 2005 927 2401 1246
`
`from the mean value of
`
`three or two mice by
`
`

`

`which indicated markedly more numerous degenerative myeli
`nated fibres P<0001 Figure 4B and C and Table 3
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`it
`
`is still
`
`is sufficient
`
`the plasma AUC of NK105
`A pharmacokinetic study revealed that
`than that of free PTX in the
`was approximately 90 fold higher
`present rodent models Prolonged circulation
`of NK105 in the
`blood due to the EPR effect was associated with a significant
`increase in the tumour AUG In fact
`the tumour AUC of NK105
`PTX
`was
`25 fold higher
`than that
`approximately
`of
`free
`Figure 2B In mice accordingly
`NK105
`exhibited stronger
`antitumour activity than free PTX Figure 3A However
`debatable whether or not
`enhanced
`accumulation of an
`the
`anticancer drug into a tumour
`in leading the drug to
`exert its antitumour activity in vivo
`Jain etahave reported that the convective
`passage of large drug
`molecules into the core of solid tumours could be impeded by
`in solid tumours However
`abnormally high interstitial
`pressures
`they also admitted that
`low molecular weight anticancer
`agents
`might be harmful
`to normal organs because they can leak out of
`normal blood vessels freely they finally concluded
`that one useful
`strategy for evading the barriers to drug dispersion would be to
`inject patients with drug carriers such as liposomes filled with
`low molecular weight drugs Jain 1994 In this case liposomes
`should have sufficient
`time to exit from the site of tumour blood
`leakage and to accumulate
`at reasonably high dose levels in
`vessel
`the surrounding interstitium Subsequently low molecular weight
`drugs packed within liposomes should be released gradually so
`the tumour However
`they can be dispersed throughout
`that
`Unezaki et al have used fluorescence labelled PEGliposomes and
`described that the area of highest fluorescence was located outside
`tumour vessels almost all around the vessel wall even 2 days after
`drug injection Unezaki et al 1996 Therefore the study suggested
`that although PEGliposomes can be delivered effectively
`to a solid
`tumour via the EPR effect
`formulation would not
`be
`the
`distributed sufficiently to cancer cells distant from tumour vessels
`because liposomes are too large to scamper about
`in the tumour
`interstitium Liposomes have been suggested to be too stable to
`easily Therefore PEG
`allow the drug therein to be released
`to be not so effective
`liposomes have been speculated
`against
`cancers in which the tumour vessel network is irregular and loose
`because of an abundant
`collagen rich matrix Such cancers include
`scirrhous cancer of the stomach
`cancer
`and pancreatic
`In fact
`Doxilg a PEGliposomal DXR is known to be effective clinically
`and breast cancer both of which are
`against ovarian cancer
`by a high density of tumour microvessels however
`characterised
`stomach
`cancer and pancreatic
`the drug is not effective
`cancer Muggia 2001
`There are several possible reasons why NK105 exhibited higher
`antitumour activity in the present study as compared with free
`PTX 1 since NK105 is very stable in the circulation and exhibits
`a markedly higher plasma AUC than free PTX it accumulates
`better in tumour tissue than does free PTX due to the EPR effect
`2 NK105
`in size 85 nm as compared with
`Doxil 100 nm thus explaining its more uniform distribution in
`tumour tissue
`in cancer
`its greater accumulation
`and
`tissue Savic et al 2003 have recently reported
`throughout cancer
`that polymeric micelles could internalise into cells to localise in
`several cytoplasmic organelles and 3 a polymeric micelle carrier
`system for a drug has the potential
`to allow the effective sustained
`release of the drug inside a tumour following the accumulation of
`tissue Regarding NK105 in particular this
`micelles into tumour
`dose of <1 yg m11
`sustained
`release begins at a PTXequivalent
`data not shown Consequently released PTX becomes distributed
`tumour tissue and internalises into cancer cells to kill
`throughout
`them
`
`against
`
`is relatively small
`
`cells
`
`A paclitaxelincorporating micellar nanoparticle
`T Hamagechi et at
`
`1244
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`Days after
`
`initial
`
`treatment
`
`Relativetumoursize
`
`B 16
`
`cy
`
`13
`
`10
`
`07
`
`0
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`Days after
`
`initial
`
`treatment
`
`>o
`
`o a
`
`cr
`
`c0
`
`Figure 3
`
`Relative changes
`
`in HT 29 tumour growth rates in nude mice
`A Effects of PTX open symbols and NKI 05 closed symbols PTX and
`NK 105 were injected iv once weekly for 3 weeks at PTXequivalent
`100 mg kg I 0
`50 mg kgI A A and
`injected to control animals 0 B Changes
`of 25 mg kg I El
`respectively Saline was
`relative body weight Data were derived from the same mice as those used
`for the present study
`
`doses
`
`in
`
`Neurotoxicity of PTX and NK105
`
`Treatment with PTX has resulted in cumulative sensorydominant
`in humans
`clinically by
`characterised
`peripheral neurotoxicity
`numbness andor paraesthesia
`of the extremities Pathologically
`axonal swelling vesicular degeneration and demyelination were
`observed We therefore examined the effects of
`free PTX and
`NK105
`and morphological
`using both
`methods
`
`electrophysiological
`
`Prior
`
`differences
`
`action
`
`to drug administration there
`were
`no
`significant
`of caudal
`sensory nerve
`in the amplitude
`potential caudal SNAP between two drug administration groups
`On day 6 after the last dosing at week 6 the amplitude of the
`caudal SNAP in the control group increased in association with rat
`maturation The amplitude was significantly smaller in the PTX
`group than in the control group P<001 while the amplitude was
`in the NK105 group than in the PTX group
`P<005 and was comparable between the NK105 group and the
`group Figure 4A Histopathological
`examination
`paraffin embedded sections
`longitudinal
`days after
`the sixth weekly injection revealed degenerative
`changes
`The NK105 administration group showed only a few degenerative
`to the PTX administration group
`myelinated fibres in contrast
`
`significantly larger
`
`control
`
`of
`
`the sciatic
`
`nerve 5
`
`of
`
`British Journal of Cancer 2005 927 12401246
`
`© 2005 Cancer Research UK
`
`

`

`eraeutic
`
`ransationa
`
`A paclitaxelincorporating micellar nanoparticle
`T Hamaguchi et at
`
`1245
`
`8
`
`5
`4 11
`
`1
`
`1 0
`
`0
`
`+ ++
`
`Control
`
`n=13
`
`1
`
`01
`
`I
`
`+ ++
`
`PTXa
`n=10
`
`+I + ++
`NK105b
`n=14
`
`C 15 r
`
`12
`
`10
`
`5
`
`Incidencenumber
`
`t
`
`Control
`
`PTX NK105
`
`Rif
`
`R
`
`k
`
`=a
`
`A
`
`40
`
`30
`
`> 20
`
`10
`
`0
`
`a
`
`14
`
`kgMagnification
`
`nerve H
`
`Incorporation of PTX into polymeric micelles diminishes neurotoxicity A Effects of PTX or NKI05 on the amplitude of rat caudal sensory
`Figure 4
`Glucose 5 was also injected
`action potentials as examined 5 days after weekly injections for 6 weeks Rats n= 14 were injected with NKI 05
`or PTX El at a PTX
`nerve
`P <005 P<001 B
`in the same manner to animals
`equivalent dose of 75 mg kgT
`in the control group
`in the sciatic nerve of rats Degenerating myelinated nerve fibres arrow were examined in the longitudinal section of the sciatic
`E 5 days after weekly injections for 6 weeks with 5 glucose a PTX b and NK I 05 c at a PTXequivalent
`Histopathological changes
`dose of 75 mg
`x 100 upper and x 400 lower C Incidences of degenerating myelinated nerve fibres in rats treated with PTX or NK I 05 N K I 05 or PTX
`was administered iv at a weekly dose of 75 mg kg for 6 consecutive
`weeks to female rats The degenerating myelinated fibre score was defined as follows
`fibres affected + slight degree of degenerative
`no degenerative changes +
`very slight degree of the degenerative changes
`changes scattered small groups of degenerative myelinated fibres + + moderate degree of degenerative changes disseminated degenerative myelinated
`fibres + + + marked degree of degenerative changes confluent
`vs PTX
`vs vehicle treated animals bP<0001
`fibres aP <0001
`groups of affected
`
`scattered
`
`single
`
`treated animals
`
`to DDSs have
`
`To date PTX preparations that are categorised
`been developed Among them clinical
`trials are currently ongoing
`for the following drugs CT 2103 polyglutamateconjugated
`PTX
`Singer et al 2003 ABI007 PTX coated with albumin Ibrahim
`et al 2002 and GenexolPM PTX micelle in which PTX is simply
`solubilised Kim et al 2004 The advantage
`commonly shared
`with these dosage forms is that they are injectable iv without
`the
`mixture of Cremophor EL and ethanol which potentially provoke
`serious allergic reactions The block copolymer used for forming
`NK105 micellar nanoparticles is nonimmunogenic and is injectable
`iv without Cremorphor EL and ethanol Therefore this dosage
`form is expected to possess a clinical advantage which is similar to
`that of the above PTX dosage forms Now what is the difference
`
`forms ABI007
`and other PTX dosage
`between NK105
`and
`the AUG and tumour AUG
`GenexolPM were
`found to have
`which are nearly comparable or rather slightly lower than those of
`free PTX Furthermore
`the plasma AUG and tumour AUG are
`115 and 118 fold higher respectively for CT 2103 than for free
`PTX but they are markedly low as compared with those of NK105
`have employed proper
`tumours and proper
`studies
`Respective
`rodent models However NK105 was forecasted
`to have markedly
`high plasma and tumour AUG as compared with those of other
`PTX dosage forms
`Regarding the toxicity profiles the repeated administration
`of
`NK105 to rats at 7 day intervals produced less toxic effects on
`peripheral nerves than free PTX This reduced the neurotoxicity of
`
`0 2005 Cancer Research UK
`
`BUtish Journal of Cancer 2005 927 2401 1246
`
`

`

`I
`
`1246
`
`A paclitaxelincorporating micellar nanoparticle
`T Hamaguchi et at
`
`Table 3
`Incidence of degenerating myelinated fibres in rats treated with
`PTX or NK105
`
`Degenerating myelinated nerve fibre scoreb
`
`Treatment
`
`Control vehicle
`PTX`
`NKI05d
`
`na
`
`13
`
`10
`
`14
`
`12
`
`8
`
`+1
`
`2
`
`++
`
`+++
`
`4
`
`4
`
`5
`
`PTX= pahlitaxel Vehicle NKI05 or PTX was administered iv at a weedy dose of
`75 mg kg I
`for 6 consecutive weeks to female rats Total number of animals
`accounted for that experimental
`defined as follows
`
`condition bDegenerating myelinated fibre score was
`
`no degenerative changes + very slight degree of the
`
`degenerative
`
`changes
`
`scattered single fibres affected + slight
`degree of
`small groups of degenerative myelinated fibers
`degenerative changes
`scattered
`++ moderate
`degree of
`degenerative
`changes
`disseminated
`myelinated fibers +++ marked degree of degenerative changes
`fibres P< 0001 vs vehicle treated animals dP<0001
`of affected
`
`degenerative
`
`groups
`confluent
`vs PTXtreated
`
`animals
`
`REFERENCES
`
`Phase
`
`doxor
`
`for drug delivery
`
`Carney DN 1996 Chemotherapy
`in the management of patients with
`inoperable non small cell
`lung cancer Semin Oncol 23 71
`75
`Hamaguchi T Matsumura Y Shirao Y Shimada Y Yamada Y Muro Y
`Okusaka T Ueno H Ikeda M Watanabe N 2003 Phase I study of novel
`drug delivery system NK911 a polymer micelle encapsulated
`ubicin Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 22 571
`Ibrahim NK Desai N Legha S SoonShiong P Theriault RL Rivera E
`Esmaeli B Ring SE Bedikian A Hortobagyi GN Ellerhorst
`JA 2002
`study of ABI007 a Cremophorfree
`I and pharmacokinetic
`protein stabilized nanoparticle formulation of paclitaxel Clin Cancer
`Res 8 1038
`1044
`Jain RK 1994 Barriers to drug delivery in solid tumours Sci Am 271
`58
`65
`Kataoka K Kwon GS Yokoyama M Okano T Sakurai Y 1993 Block
`I Control Rel 24
`copolymer micelles as vehicles
`119 132
`Khayat D Antoine EC Coeffic D 2000 Taxol
`in the management of
`Invest 18 242
`cancers of the breast and the ovary Cancer
`260
`Kim TY Kim DW Chung JY Shin SG Kim SC Heo DS Kim NK Bang YJ
`2004 Phase I and pharmacokinetic
`study of GenexolPM a

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket