throbber
Biochemistry
`
`C Copyright
`
`1971 by the American Chemical Society
`
`Volume 10 Number 22
`
`October 26 1971
`
`Differences between Bovine and Human Serum Albumins
`
`Binding Isotherms Optical Rotatory Dispersion Viscosity
`
`Hydrogen Ion Titration and Fluorescence Effects
`
`Jacinto Steinhardt Johanna Krijn and Joan G Leidy
`
`prerequisite
`
`ABSTRACT Human serum albumin HSA offers advantages
`over bovine serum albumin BSA in studying the effects of
`ligand binding to the protein on such optical properties as
`difference spectra fluorescence and optical rotatory dispersion
`ORD because although the compositions of the two proteins
`are very similar human serum albumin HSA contains only
`than two as BSA The bind
`residue rather
`one tryptophan
`ing isotherms of HSA to a number of alkane derivatives were
`to the optical experi
`obtained as a necessary
`ments they are reported here as well as a the effects of bind
`ing on the ORD and viscosity of solutions of HSA and b
`portions of its hydrogen ion titration curve HSA differs only
`in detail from BSA in some of these properties HSA appears
`to unfold in either one stage or in an essentially continuous
`process while BSA has been shown to exist in two distinguish
`able unfolded states at pH 4856 At 686 both appear to un
`fold in a single or mixed process Comparative hydrogen ion
`the number of basic groups
`titration data demonstrate that
`in HSA
`accessible to solvent after exposure to pH 4 is larger
`than in BSA When the fluorescence
`behavior of the two pro
`teins is compared more radical differences appear The lone
`tryptophan of HSA has only about
`threequarters the fluo
`rescence emission as the average per chromophore of the two
`tryptophans of BSA Tyrosine fluorescence
`has an abnormally
`low quantum yield in both proteins but in HSA disorganiza
`
`tion by binding unfolding ligands dodecyl sulfate and
`myristyl sulfate strongly raises the tyrosine emission The
`fluo
`the tryptophan
`two proteins differ strikingly in that
`rescence in HSA is enhanced
`by com
`and in BSA is quenched
`bination with long chain n > 10 alkyl derivatives Binding
`even small amounts shifts the tryptophan
`fluorescence
`spec
`trum to shorter wavelengths in both proteins short chain
`ligands cause the same shifts but produce little or no quench
`ing or enhancement BSA quenching requires binding of only
`1 or 2 equiv but HSA enhancement
`4 and
`requires between
`6 With very large amounts bound either protein is severely
`and tryptophan
`fluorescence is
`disorganized by unfolders
`strongly quenched The relative quenching is the same in both
`and others involving polarization
`proteins This observation
`measurements suggest
`that considerable structure remains in
`the unfolded proteins The fluorescence
`effects of binding to
`in HSA are essentially the
`BSA differ at pH 56 and 686 but
`from tyrosine to tryptophan occurs to a
`same Energy transfer
`greater extent in HSA and is greatest when complexed with un
`classes of binding
`folding ligands It appears that distinct
`some
`in the native proteins the distances between
`sites exist
`of them is inferred as well as the occurrence of rapid diffusion
`of bound ligand between
`and unoccupied binding
`occupied
`sites and the existence of internal bonds which reduce fluo
`rescence in uncomplexed HSA
`
`alkyl
`
`The
`complexing of bovine serum albumin BSA1 with
`ligands including long chain detergents and fatty acids
`in the absorbance of its trypto
`is accompanied by changes
`phan and tyrosine residues Bigelow and Sonnenberg
`1962
`
`of Chemistry Georgetown University
`
`From the Department
`Washington D C 20007 Received February 3 1971 Supported by
`National Science Foundation Grant GB 13391
`used are BSA bovine serum albumin HSA human
`Abbreviations
`serum albumin MRW mean residue weight l moles of ligand bound
`to protein per mole of protein
`
`Polet and Steinhardt 1968 Gallagher et al 1970 Some of
`Si transition of
`these changes are paradoxical
`in that
`the So
`the tryptophan band differs in sign blue shift from the So
`S2 transition of the same chromophore red shift More com
`involving both tyrosine and tryptophan occur
`plex changes
`when the protein is unfolded at f > 10 Since BSA contains
`two tryptophans which may lodge in different environments
`and human serum albumin contains only one further syste
`of these proteins
`matic study of the spectral perturbations
`with the purpose of elucidating the nature of
`the binding
`sites appeared to be more promising if carried out with HSA
`
`BIOCHEMISTRY
`
`VOL 10 NO 22 1 9 7 1
`
`4005
`
`Abraxis EX2057
`Actavis LLC v Abraxis Bioscience LLC
`1PR201701101 1PR201701103 1PR201701104
`
`

`

`HSA
`
`and
`
`BSA
`
`90
`
`80
`
`70
`
`60
`
`950
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`6
`
`5
`
`3
`4
`Log Ceq
`
`2
`
`FIGURE
`
`Effect of binding various detergent sulfates and dodecyl
`sulfonate by 01 HSA at pH 56 phosphate or 686 phosphate
`Tagged symbols indicate lot 24 HSA untagged lot 30
`where noted
`Filled symbols indicate 25° unfilled 2 0 Octyl sulfate
`HSA
`decyl sulfate D dodecylsulfonate CD dodecyl sulfate G
`dodecyl sulfate pH 686 0 myristyl sulfate L BSA lot 8167
`dodecyl sulfate pH 56
`BSA lot 8167 dodecyl sulfate pH 686
`is expressed as a function of log Ce the equilibrium
`Molal ratio t
`of ligand not bound to protein
`
`concentration
`
`rather than with BSA Except for the difference in tryptophans
`and a higher content of valine in HSA the amino acid com
`positions of the two proteins are practically identical
`reports the binding isotherms of HSA at 2
`This paper first
`and 25° at pH 56 with several alkyl
`ligands and a fatty acid
`of the ORD and viscosity on the
`as well as the dependence
`extent and type of the ligand bound Slight differences be
`functions of the two proteins
`tween
`these physicochemical
`have
`been
`including
`differences in their
`titration curves
`found In the later pages much more striking differences in
`the fluorescent properties
`including relative intensity are
`on
`reported as well as opposing effects
`these properties
`quenching
`or enhancement of each chromophore when
`they are complexed with alkyl ligands
`
`Experimental Section
`
`Materials Solutions of crystallized BSA lot 8167 Nutri
`tional Biochemicals or of HSA Pentex lots 24 and 30 were
`deionized on a Dintzis column before use Stock solutions of
`deionized protein were stored at 2° and used within 2 weeks
`Because solutions of dissolved crystallized HSA lot 24 be
`came cloudy at room temperature most stock
`solutions of
`deionized HSA were stored in phosphate buffer 14 = 0033
`at either pH 56 or 686 which kept them clear The concentra
`tions of the solutions were determined spectrophotometrically
`
`2 The only other marked differences
`in composition are in the amide
`of which BSA contains 35 residues
`nitrogen and
`the valine content
`Schultze et al 1962 and HSA 45 Phelps and Putnam 1960 p 143
`that portions of the amino acid sequences
`There is fragmentary evidence
`differ substantially Swaney and Klotz 1970
`
`4006
`
`BIOCHEMISTRY
`
`VOL 10 NO 22 1 9 7 1
`
`STEINHARDT KRIJN AND LEIDY
`
`as previously
`
`described Reynolds et al 1967 using the
`ell 7HSA = 53 and
`following extinction
`coefficients at X279
`Ea BSA = 667 The native BSA contained 10 equiv of fatty
`em
`acidmole of protein and the HSA 027 equivmole when
`measured by a modification Chen 1967 of the method of
`Dole 1956
`The alkyl
`ligands used were a special grade prepared for us
`by Mann Research Their purity has been described earlier
`Reynolds et al 1967 The laurate isotherm was determined
`with the C isotope New England Nuclear
`
`All measurements were made in phosphate buffers reagent
`grade at 0033 ionic strength at either pH 560 or 686
`Methods Binding isotherms were determined for HSA at
`2 and 25 by the equilibrium dialysis method used for BSA
`Reynolds et al 1967 The 14C isotope of laurate was used at
`23 Reynolds et al 1968 and assayed with a scintillation
`center
`
`in ionic
`
`all
`
`ORD measurements were made with a Jasco Model ORD
`UV 5 spectrophotometer
`Viscosity measurements were made in 50 stoke Cannon
`Fenske viscometers with flow times of 200600 sec with photo
`electric timing reproducible to =001 sec Measurements were
`made at 2 and 23 the temperature was controlled to better
`than ±001° All solutions were prepared with filtered Milli
`pore phosphate buffer
`Titration curves were obtained with a Radiometer Titrator
`TTT lc and Titrigraph SBR 2c using 8 ml of 0513
`protein
`solutions in 0033 xi KC1 and adding 0306 M 1ICI or NaOH
`in 0033 m KC1 there was no significant
`change
`strength during the titration since practically
`the
`acid
`added was combined and solutions were originally at the same
`strength No significant
`contribution to the
`ionic
`ionic
`strength was made by the protein Tanford 1961 p 468
`Fluorescence measurements of 01
`protein solutions at
`25° were made with an AmincoBowman spectrophotofluo
`rometer and a HewlettPackard XY recorder Model 7035B
`The sample in a 03 cm silica cell was excited with horizon
`tally polarized light to suppress scatter at 90 due to the excita
`tion beam Chen 1967a A 1P28 photomultiplier
`tube and
`gratings blazed for 300 nm were used with 05mm slits at
`and a 4 mm slit at
`two faces of the cell compartment
`the
`tube With
`this phototube gratings and
`photomultiplier
`the emission spectra were almost completely un
`polarizer
`light output sensitivity or absorp
`distorted by instrumental
`tion Chen 1967a
`The wavelength scales were calibrated
`and corrected except
`case of Figure 5 which uses
`consistent uncalibrated scales for expository purposes only
`Fluctuations
`intensity were minimized
`in the exciting light
`by closely regulating the power supply When necessary the
`photomultiplier gain or recorder amplification was altered to
`keep each set of spectra of the native protein approximately
`
`the
`
`in the
`
`superimposable
`translated to F the
`Equivalents of
`ligands present were
`molal ratio bound on the basis of the isotherms presented in
`isotherms for BSA
`Figure 1 combined with data from other
`lot number Reynolds
`determined earlier at 23° with a different
`et al 1967 Considerable variation in results with different
`V > 20 Anderson 1966 however
`lot numbers can occur at
`our own experiments show that
`this variability occurs sig
`only with ligands which unfold With myristyl
`nificantly
`and the problem does
`sulfate binding is almost quantitative
`
`obtained with a 1 mm slit
`Both excitation and emission spectra
`proved to be indistinguishable from those obtained with a 4 mm slit
`
`

`

`DIFFERENCES BETWEEN BOVINE AND HUMAN SERUM ALBUMINS
`
`co
`
`cr
`
`t 5
`
`Ce
`
`Ce
`
`00
`
`00
`
`CeCe
`
`Cr
`
`CCC
`
`C4
`
`Ce
`
`E c
`
`d
`
`cd
`
`PA
`
`743
`
`a
`
`en
`
`1
`
`1s
`
`a
`
`ts
`
`00
`
`<
`
`m
`m
`N 0000
`
`en co r Lr
`N N r s
`
`0
`
`10
`
`C
`
`00 0
`
`71
`
`r
`rs2ONN0
`O N 00
`
`71 N CP
`6
`
`6
`
`O
`
`en
`
`6
`
`C
`00 00 0
`
`00
`
`fNi
`
`i
`
`1
`
`1
`
`i
`
`1
`
`<1
`t4
`
`g
`
`5 5Ce mcz
`cdc5
`
`6 C4 5 8
`
`5 451
`
`c 1 0 >1 121+1
`
`riD
`
`x c
`
`n
`
`rID
`
`lID
`Pa
`
`lID
`
`z
`
`cn
`
`rn
`
`riD
`
`Ce
`
`X
`
`47
`
`cn
`
`X
`
`riD
`
`CA
`
`CA
`
`riDz
`
`riDx
`
`riD
`
`0 2
`
`1
`
`X 4
`
`4
`
`z
`
`Ce
`
`Ce
`
`riD
`
`0
`
`cd
`
`01
`
`not arise with dodecyl sulfate the other unfolder
`included
`in these experiments a new isotherm for BSA of the lot num
`ber used in this work included in Figure 1 proved to be mea
`surably different at high V from those published earlier Since
`we have also established that
`isotherms obtained with both
`proteins at both 2 and 25° do not differ within the accuracy
`of our measurements we have supplemented the data of Fig
`ure 1 with earlier data on the binding of the nonunfolders
`to BSA as required
`
`Results
`
`HSA Isotherms Portions of binding isotherms of HSA for
`the ligands studied were measured as in our earlier work with
`BSA Ray et al 1966 Reynolds et al 1967 The results of
`such measurements with four sulfate halfesters of varying
`chain lengthfrom C8 to C14 and with one long chain sul
`fonate are shown in Figure 14 For reference purposes binding
`isotherms of BSA lot 8167 with dodecyl sulfate at two pH
`values are included A few experiments at 25° established that
`differences between data obtained at 2 and 25° did not exist
`or were within the experimental error
`Although the binding isotherms for dodecyl sulfate of BSA
`and HSA are very similar with BSA a change
`in pH from
`56 to 686 has a relatively large effect on the unfolding
`region of the isotherms whereas with HSA the change in pH
`has only about half the effect
`With the exception of myristyl C14 sulfate the ligands in
`Figure 1 appear to bind to HSA to about
`the same extent as
`to BSA Myristyl sulfate is remarkable in appearing to unfold
`HSA at much lower equilibrium concentrations
`than with
`BSA Klotz or Scatchard plots of the low 77
`regions native
`the numbers of high affinity sites in
`protein indicate that
`HSA for each ligand are close to those in BSA and most of
`the association constants are usually very nearly the same in
`HSA as in BSA with the shorter chains however
`the associa
`tion constants are only one tenth to one fifth as great Table
`for the numbers of high affinity sites
`I gives the best values
`ligand and the corresponding as
`
`n for each nonunfolding
`sociation constants K in the native protein For comparison
`
`values for BSA Reynolds etal 1967 1970 are also included
`The values for the unfolder dodecyl sulfate were newly deter
`mined for the BSA lot 8167 used in the present study The
`constant Ui in
`for the unfolding
`table also contains values
`the case of unfolding ligands and m and J the numbers of
`sites in unfolded protein and their intrinsic association con
`U2 and L included refer
`stant The additional
`constants
`to
`reaction Decker and Foster
`a postulated second unfolding
`1967 Reynolds et al 1970 The values Ul and U2 are not
`critically determined The value for J in the case of myristyl
`to wide uncertainty
`since only a small
`sulfate is also subject
`part of the unfolded portion of the isotherm was obtained
`
`4
`
`15 values
`
`for BSA in the figures are usually from earlier papers and
`to a 6 70 decrease because 69000 rather than 65000
`are therefore subject
`in their calculation New 15 values for
`was used as the molecular weight
`
`BSA determined in this work are also high by 6 since for consistency
`they were similarly calculated 69000 was correctly used in calculating
`all values for HSA
`5 Data for laurate a fatty acid anion are taken from Goodman 1958
`for I < 6 and from our own data see Methods at v > 6 There is fairly
`6 to 9 between the two sets of
`good agreement in the overlap region 15
`data
`6 In the case of lot 8167 BSA only seven to eight high affinity sites
`for dodecyl sulfate were found in place of the eight
`to nine reported
`earlier for other lot numbers
`
`BIOCHEMISTRY
`
`VOL 10 NO 22 1 9 7 1
`
`4007
`
`

`

`STEINHARDT KRIJN AND LEIDY
`
`5
`
`6
`
`pH
`
`7
`
`FIGURE 4 Titration curves from pH 4 of HSA and BSA in 0033 NA
`KC1 with 0306 N NaOH in 0033 rvi KC1 at 250 Abscissa is negative
`
`from an initial
`M1233 is reduced
`stages is not observed
`value for the uncomplexed protein by nearly the same pro
`portion 57
`as with BSA as E rises from 0 to 10 With
`octyl and decyl sulfates which do not unfold there are no
`further changes With the two unfolders included in Figure 2
`where there was a plateau with BSA beginning at
`17 ca 10
`none is found with HSA
`M133 decreases monotonically
`with no hint of a pause at the level of P = 10 and only levels
`off at P = 60 where for BSA the second stage of change is
`give the same ORD results
`beginning The two unfolders
`The nonunfolders level off at different M233 values
`Viscosity Figure 3 displays the dependence of the reduced
`HSA solutions at 2° and pH 56 on the ex
`viscosity of 02
`to which the protein combines with decyl dodecyl and
`tent
`myristyl sulfates The results with decyl sulfate are similar to
`those found with BSA in experiments conducted at 01
`pro
`tein Reynolds et al 1967 The data obtained with dodecyl
`sulfate differ in three respects from those obtained with BSA
`shown as a broken curve7 a the viscosity goes through a
`minimum at a value of a below 108 b it rises substantially
`at a above 10 and c a further rise between a = 60 and 90
`brings the viscosity up to a plateau 86 where in the Reynolds
`et al data 1967 BSA showed a substantial
`further rise The
`results obtained with myristyl sulfate are in qualitative agree
`ment with those obtained with BSA at
`low 27 numbers the
`viscosities are lower than with dodecyl sulfate
`Titration Curves The titration curves
`shown in Figure 4
`
`is clear that
`
`were obtained by commencing the titration with base after
`bringing identical weight per cent solutions of both proteins
`in 0033 tvi NaCl to pH 40 with HC1 It
`to return
`the pH from 40 to 5560 5 equiv more base are required
`for HSA than for BSA This difference between
`the titra
`remains constant at higher pH values
`tion curves however
`up to at least pH 76 When 30 equiv of dodecyl sulfate are
`the difference between HSA and BSA rises from 5
`present
`equiv to 10 ie HSA gains a still greater buffering capacity
`than BSA under these conditions for incipient unfolding The
`into play by the presence of detergent
`extra groups brought
`have a midrange pK of 65
`
`Preliminary experiments show that when the initial acidi
`fication is much greater ie to pH 26 it
`is BSA rather than
`HSA that
`requires more base in returning to pH 8 Clearly
`the conformation changes accompanying acid unfolding N
`
`7 The results shown for BSA differ at high i
`from those published by
`Reynolds Cr at 1967 in that
`to show a sharp rise in
`lot 8167 fails
`t = 100 and thus resembles HSA at all
`v above about 40
`viscosity near
`low pH 38 and much
`8 A broad minimum is found with BSA only at
`lower ionic strength 0001 Reynolds et al 1970
`
`1
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`1
`
`ORDHSA
`
`65001
`
`4m1233
`
`7000
`
`e Myristyfsulfate
`o Dodecylsulfate
`O Decylsulfate
`o Octylsulfate
`BSA
`
`Dodecylsulfate
`
`80 90 00 10 eo
`
`70
`
`7500
`
`1IIIiIII
`
`f 0 20
`
`30 40 50 60
`
`HSA and BSA complexed
`FIGURE 2 Mean residue rotation of 01
`with various detergent sulfates as a function of molal ratio t at
`Cotton effect trough 233 nm pH 56 ionic strength 0033
`
`the
`
`because of solubility limitations The
`full equation used for
`two stage unfolding will be furnished by the authors on re
`quest
`Dispersion ORD
`Binding Dependent Optical Rotatory
`HSA shows a Cotton effect
`trough at 233 nm similar to that
`of BSA The two proteins have troughs of approximately the
`same depth about 8300° corresponding to a mean residue
`rotation M133 of about 7500° MRW = 114 How
`ever Figure 2 shows
`the reduction in the levorotation of
`HSA resulting from combination with a number of alkyl
`gands differs radically from the variation in the ORD of BSA
`described Reynolds et al 1967 With
`we have previously
`BSA there is an initial
`rises to about 10 almost
`identical effects are pro
`itself as v
`duced by complexes with Cg to C14 sulfates Among the sul
`fonates C8 alone produces a much smaller effect
`in terms of
`M133 at a given V and hexyl derivatives produce no effect
`at all No further changes occur as P rises beyond 10 except
`with the unfolders dodecyl and myristyl sulfates and my
`ristylsulfonate With the latter
`M1233 is greatly diminished
`at E values above about 50
`With HSA the division of changes
`
`that
`
`li
`
`reduction of about 7 due to binding
`
`in M1233 into three
`
`1
`
`I
`
`et al 2°
`
`230
`
`et 011967 230
`
`1
`
`Dodecyl sulfate
`o HSA
`2°
`BSA Reynolds
`0 HSA
`23°
`BSA lot 6167
`
`Myristylsulfate
`A HSA 2°
`BSA Reynolds
`Decylsulfate
`0 HSA 2°
`
`16
`
`14
`
`12
`
`1
`
`V 10
`
`gs 8
`
`0 60
`
`4 2
`
`80 II
`40
`
`20
`
`I
`
`60
`
`80
`
`100
`
`120
`
`140
`
`160
`
`FIGURE 3 Reduced viscosities of 02 HSA complexed with various
`detergent sulfates as a function of molal ratio t at pH 56 phos
`phate ionic strength 0033 2 and 230
`
`4008
`
`BIOCHEMISTRY
`
`VOL 10 NO 22 1 9 7 1
`
`

`

`DIFFERENCES BETWEEN BOVINE AND HUMAN SERUM ALBUMINS
`
`L
`
`16
`
`Excitation
`
`at
`
`285nm
`
`Ui° 14
`
`Ui
`
`fUi
`
`12
`
`Ct0 10
`u a
`
`Ui
`
`2
`
`J L
`
`ii
`et
`
`250
`
`300
`
`FIGURE 6 The emission spectra of BSA and HSA excited at 285 nm
`plotted on the same scale
`
`the spectra ob
`gand This procedure is possible because all
`ie
`tained with excitation above 295 nm are fully congruent
`superimposable by shifts along the wavelength axis after nor
`malization on a model emission spectrum of a protein trypto
`phan analog Nacetyltryptophanamide With HSA however
`the curves depart
`with its large tyrosine emission component
`and the blue shift mea
`slightly from complete congruency
`sured at Xm may be smaller than the blue shift measured at
`the red end after normalization the latter is used in this paper
`The discrepancy is usually under 20 and has been disre
`
`garded in this first
`investigation
`When the excitation wavelengths are <295 nm both tyro
`sine and tryptophan are excited and the emission of both may
`be affected by energy transfer from excited tyrosine to trypto
`phan Analysis of each of the emission spectra
`into tyrosine
`and tryptophan
`components is made possible by making use
`of
`1 The emission spectrum of a tryptophan peptide model
`compound Nacetyltryptophanamide in ethanol
`2 The emission spectra of HSA and BSAligand com
`is excited Xexe > 295 nm
`plexes when only the tryptophan
`between
`in emission
`this permits distinction
`these changes
`at particular wavelengths which are due to quenching or en
`hancement and those changes which are due to a shift
`toward
`the ultraviolet of the entire spectrum
`3 The emission spectra of HSA and BSAligand com
`and the tyrosine residues
`plexes when both the tryptophan
`are excited Xe < 295 nm Since the tryptophan
`contribu
`tion has been determined see 2 the contribution to the emis
`sion due to tyrosine can be obtained by subtraction
`from
`the steps in the procedure which differ
`Details of all
`the matrix method of Weber 19611 to which Figure 5B re
`fers are available on request from the authors
`Intensities Since BSA contains twice
`Relative Fluorescence
`as HSA a large difference in emission
`as much tryptophan
`intensity is to be expected however
`the ratio of intensities
`actually found when the fluorescence of both proteins is plot
`than 2 Figure 6
`ted with the same amplification is larger
`The ratio is close to 27 with either deionized or defatted pro
`tein when the excitation wavelength affects only the trypto
`phan Nevertheless the lifetimes of the excited states 61 and
`
`9 The emission spectrum of Nacetyltryptophanamide
`dissolved in
`is very similar to that of the tryptophan in BSA or HSA when
`ethanol
`is shifted 3 nm to the blue The emission spectrum of N
`the latter
`acetyltyrosinamide is almost independent of solvent
`
`BIOCHEMISTRY
`
`VOL 10 NO 22 1 9 7 1
`
`4009
`
`w
`9
`
`r
`
`ce0
`31
`
`BSA Dodecylsulfate
`
`EXCITATION 300nm
`
`EXCITATION 285nm
`
`BLUE SHIFT
`
`TYlirMIAIF
`
`Y111411i1119111
`
`PROTEIN
`EMISSION
`
`TYROSINE
`
`SLUE SHIFT4m
`
`PROTEIN EMISSION
`
`NORMALIZED MODEL
`CURVE RATIO
`R
`
`SEGMENT OF
`eLUESHIFTED1
`
`PROTEIN CURVE
`
`Ui
`
`PROTEIN
`LIGAND 4e41
`
`350
`A
`
`O30
`
`PROTEIN 1
`LIGAND4q
`
`RATIO r `n
`TRYPTOPHAN
`COMPONENT
`
`B
`
`FIGURE 5 Steps in the determination of the contributions of tyrosine
`and tryptophan to the total emission of BSA and its alkyl complexes
`and of distinguishing between the effects of shifts in km and quench
`ing or enhancement A Excitation at 295 to 305 nm B excitation
`at 280 to 290 nm The steps in the analysis are explained in the text
`
`F transition which may unmask prototropic groups are not
`rapidly reversible in at least one of the two proteins Lovrien
`and Tanford 1959 obtained identical
`titration curves
`1 sec
`and 5 min after mixing BSA with acid but apparently they
`titrate in the reverse direction also The results de
`did not
`to be compared with normal titration
`scribed above
`are not
`curves of these proteins Tanford 1955 Foster and Clark
`1962 Vijai and Foster 1967 since the titrations are preceded
`by an unmasking exposure to acid pH
`Analysis of the Fluorescence Spectra When native uncom
`bined HSA or BSA is excited by radiation with a wavelength
`near 280 nm the fluorescence
`contains emission by both tyro
`side chains Chen 1967b p 443 With
`sine and tryptophan
`BSA the tyrosine contribution is much less conspicuous than
`with HSA Tryptophan
`emission comes not only from side
`but also from
`chains excited by the external
`radiation
`tryptophan side chains excited by radiationless energy trans
`fer from excited tyrosine side chains Chen 1967b However
`when either HSA or BSA is excited by wavelengths between
`295 and 305 nm all of the tryptophan which emits is excited
`radiation tyrosine is not excited and thus
`by the incident
`neither emits nor
`transfers energy Therefore by exciting
`with such wavelengths only a pure tryptophan emission spec
`trum is obtained with the position of the energy maximum
`envi
`ronment When alkyl
`ligands are bound and tryptophan
`only is excited the spectrum changes
`and the entire fluorescence spectrum are blue shifted without
`distortion and b the intensity of
`the emission is either
`enhanced or diminished quenched Since only tryptophan
`in determining to what ex
`is excited there is no difficulty
`the changed
`emission represents a blue shift andor
`tent
`is readily determined from the ratio
`quenching
`The latter
`
`X dependent on the properties of the tryptophan
`in two ways a X
`
`of the intensities at X or at any other homologous part
`of X Since
`
`the emission spectrum The blue shift can be recognized
`of
`by direct
`the maxima are
`determination
`is more accurately determined by mul
`broad the blue shift
`tiplying the emission curve for the proteinligand complex by
`is required to make the maxima equal and
`whatever
`the long wave
`levels of
`then averaging at several different
`length portion of the two curves protein alone and proteinli
`
`factor
`
`

`

`BSA
`
`Xex 305
`
`HSA
`
`STEINHARDT
`BSA
`
`ex
`
`K RIJN AND LEIDY
`HSA
`
`305
`
`3
`
`2
`
`a
`
`300
`
`350
`
`400
`
`300
`
`350
`
`400
`
`300
`
`350
`
`400
`
`300
`
`350
`
`400
`
`290
`
`290
`
`1
`
`3
`
`c 2
`
`3
`
`a 0 U a
`
`4
`2a
`
`LY
`
`I
`
`300
`
`350
`
`400
`
`300
`
`350
`
`400
`
`nm
`FIGURE 7 The fluorescence of BSA and HSA cornplexed with various
`two different
`amounts of octyl sulfate Selected data obtained
`The wavelengths
`and
`excitation wavelengths
`scales are calibrated
`the spectra require practically no correction
`tivity of the measuring system
`
`at
`
`for differential sensi
`
`per
`
`is severely
`
`for
`
`as will be shown when
`59 sec are almost the same However
`HSA binds 4 to <60 equiv of most alkyl
`ligands its fluores
`cence is greatly enhanced The maximum enhanced
`fluores
`cence is almost exactly half of that of uncomplexed BSA so
`fluorescence
`that under
`these conditions average
`efficiency
`the same in the two proteins The
`tryptophan is about
`emission of both unfolded proteins
`tryptophan
`the enhanced HSA is quenched more than
`quenched but
`BSA thus at very high 0 both proteins have about
`the same
`ca 27 as in the uncombined
`ratio of tryptophan fluorescence
`result is considered further in the Dis
`state This unexpected
`cussion
`intensity given by 145 X 101 m BSA on
`The fluorescence
`excitation at 300 nm is very nearly the same as that given by
`3 X 105 m Nacetyltryptophanamide a suitable model
`tryptophan in a protein two tryptophans
`per molecule It
`the tryptophans in BSA
`is therefore tempting to conclude that
`are normal It
`the single tryptophan of HSA
`follows that
`the tyrosines in BSA were also nor
`is partially quenched If
`mal one would expect
`the intensity of the tyrosine emission
`from a 01 70 albumin solution to be similar to that of about
`24 X 104M Nacetyltyrosinamide when excited at 280 nm
`less than this is found in both BSA and HSA
`Considerably
`roughly equal to 1 < 10 m There are very nearly the same
`number of tyrosines in the two proteins and the tyrosine emis
`sion at 290300 nm with excitation at 280 in both appears
`in HSA is substantially
`to be the same although the latter
`higher than in BSA relative to that of tryptophan
`Spectra Some of
`the features of individual
`Fluorescence
`are shown in Figures 7 and 8 The peak
`fluorescence
`spectra
`or shoulder near 305 nm found in the spectra obtained with
`excitation at this wavelength is due to incomplete suppression
`of scattering of the exciting beam It
`is observed to increase
`
`10 This statement does not
`imply that
`the two tryptophans in BSA are the same
`in BSA has been reported
`The quantum efficiency
`of tryptophan
`as 0152 Teale 1960 Excitation was at 280 nm
`
`the fluorescence
`
`intensities of
`
`4010
`
`BIOCHEMISTRY
`
`VOL 10 NO 22 1 9 7 1
`
`300
`
`350
`
`400
`
`300
`
`350
`
`400
`
`X nm
`FIGURE 8 A selection of data obtained with dodecyl sulfate com
`plexes of BSA and HSA similar to those shown for octyl sulfate in
`Figure 7 Since binding large amounts of dodecyl sulfate causes the
`to unfold some of the curves included show the effects on
`proteins
`fluorescence severe tryptophan quenching of such unfolding
`
`when binding occurs or when defatted protein is used A vari
`able amount of aggregation may be responsible Andersson
`1966 The scattering is more prominent in experiments with
`HSA Excitation at shorter wavelengths at 280 285 and 290
`nm rarely shows a detectable shoulder
`the two proteins when octyl sulfate is
`Differences between
`bound are shown in Figure 7 When excited at 305 nm top
`row only tryptophan
`emits and the molecular
`basis of the
`differences is especially clear The BSA tryptophan emission is
`at 0 = 38 Very little additional quenching
`strongly quenched
`to 60 and
`the amount bound increases
`if any occurs
`as
`scarcely more when it rises to 37 nearly 300 equiv are required
`to attain 0 = 37 A progressive blue shift
`is clearly shown
`With HSA there is a blue shift but only a slight degree of
`quenching at o = 33 At larger amounts bound the trypto
`phan emission is enhanced When the exciting beam is at
`290 nm the analysis displayed in Figure 5 shows that
`in BSA
`is blue shifted and quenched With
`the tryptophan component
`HSA the blue shift
`is accompanied by considerable enhance
`ment at r = 22
`With dodecyl sulfate an unfolder Figure 8 a very similar
`situation prevails blue shifts accompany tryptophan enhance
`in HSA quenching in BSA until massive unfolding
`ment
`occurs 0 = 175 in this figure Tryptophan
`emission is then
`in both BSA and HSA upper row but
`strongly quenched
`this strong tryptophan
`quenching is accompanied by great
`in the case of HSA The curve ob
`tyrosine enhancement
`tained with 0 = 175 in the lower righthand panel
`is very simi
`lar to a tyrosine emission curve
`Comparisons with Indicidual Ligands Measurements
`have
`been made with the two proteins at many values of IT and with
`many ligands and the results analyzed into tryptophan
`blue
`shifts and quenching or enhancement
`and tyrosine quench
`ing or enhancement Summaries are presented in Figures 912
`Since o runs from 0 to over 175 and since some of the most
`significant changes occur at low values of 0 0 is represented on
`a logarithmic scale Since IT = 0 cannot be represented on the
`graphs the values for IT = 0 have been indicated by horizontal
`
`

`

`DIFFERENCES BETWEEN BOVINE AND HUMAN SERUM ALBUMINS
`
`DODECYLSULFON
`
`HSA
`
`BSA
`
`Excited
`
`o Excited
`
`285
`300
`
`_ C
`
`cr
`
`r
`
`10
`
`co
`
`0
`18e
`
`8
`
`L1
`
`it
`
`12
`
`0r
`
`0
`
`t Lob
`0
`
`I
`
`3 o
`
`sUi
`06
`
`LT
`
`04
`
`To
`= 02
`0
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`log 0
`
`in HSA due to the
`FIGURE 11 Summary of fluorescence changes
`See Figure 9 figure legend for explana
`binding of dodecylsulfonate
`tion The abrupt drop in tryptophan fluorescence and the sharp rise
`in tyrosine fluorescence are similar to those of the unfolding ligands
`has been shown to be a nonunfolder of
`although dodecylsulfonate
`BSA
`
`t 201 OCTYLSULFATE
`10 I
`
`al
`
`0
`
`118
`s 16
`
`HSABSA
`
`Excited 285
`o Excited 300
`
`er
`
`12
`
`l
`
`I 0 11Lic
`Oa
`14
`04
`
`I
`
`U §
`
`8E
`
`3u
`
`>LLI
`
`E 021
`L
`10
`
`05
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`log
`
`FIGURE 9 Summary of the effects on the fluorescence of BSA and
`HSA of binding various amounts of octyl sulfate Closed circles rep
`resent BSA and open circles represent HSA The blue shifts top of
`figure were obtained with Xexe close to 300 nm The quenching
`BSA or enhancement HSA of tryptophan is shown for two exci
`ca 300 and ca 285 nm Data obtained with the
`tation wavelengths
`which
`wavelength
`excitation
`excited
`tyrosine as well as
`are denoted by an attached diagonal The data for
`tryptophan
`tyrosine emission were all obtained with Xmax near 285 nm Unlike
`the tryptophan data they are not given on a scale relative to the
`uncombined protein see text
`
`latter
`
`1
`
`in
`
`ledger lines at the values characteristic of the uncombined pro
`tein 0 in the case of the blue shift
`in the case of relative
`tryptophan emission
`Although the results obtained with each ligand differ
`the more important distinctions
`can be displayed by
`detail
`contrasting the data obtained for both proteins with one li
`
`gand that does not unfold octyl sulfate and one that unfolds
`dodecyl sulfate
`a Figure 9 octyl sulfate There is a progressive blue shift
`in both proteins from e = 2
`fluorescence
`of the tryptophan
`is greater in HSA than in BSA The changes
`to almost 20 It
`which occur between 27 = 10 to 20 and e = 40 to 60 are small
`in the range V = 2 to 8 and
`compared to those which occur
`in the case of the unfolders at V over 60
`Even the smallest amounts bound to BSA result
`in strong
`27 exceeds 40
`quenching which does not
`increase further until
`When tyrosine is excited Xe 285 nm the apparent quenching
`
`DODECYLSULFATE
`0156
`pH 686
`o
`o
`Excited
`o Excited
`
`285
`300
`
`HSA
`
`041
`
`20
`
`U2
`
`1 10
`
`o
`2 18
`
`p 16
`
`w 14
`
`3 o
`
`w
`
`12
`
`LO
`
`as
`
`06
`
`3
`
`4 l
`
`a 04
`cc
`I a2
`
`05
`
`10
`
`log
`
`15
`
`20
`
`in HSA brought
`FIGURE 12 Comparison of the fluoresce

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket