throbber
Downloaded
`
`from
`
`ajplungphysiologyorg
`
`on
`
`December
`
`30
`
`2011
`
`Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 284 L187L196
`2003
`101152ajplung001522002
`
`Quantitative
`
`analysis of albumin uptake and transport
`in the rat microvessel endothelial monolayer
`
`THERESA A JOHN 1 STEPHEN M VOGEL 1 CHINNASWAMY
`ASRAR B MALIK 1 AND RICHARD D MINSHALL
`of 1Pharmacology and 2Anesthesiology College of Medicine
`Departments
`60612
`of Illinois
`Chicago Illinois
`
`12
`
`TIRUPPATHI
`
`1
`
`University
`
`Submitted
`
`15 May 2002 accepted in final
`
`form 14 August
`
`2002
`
`involving
`
`of
`
`by high
`
`nonspecific
`
`John Theresa A Stephen M Vogel Chinnaswamy
`Tiruppathi Asrar B Malik
`D Minshall
`and Richard
`Quantitative analysis of albumin uptake and transport in the
`endothelial monolayer Am J Physiol Lung
`rat microvessel
`Cell Mol Physiol 284 L187L196 2003 101152ajplung
`001522002We
`depen
`determined
`the
`concentration
`dence of albumin binding uptake and transport
`in conflu
`ent monolayers
`cultured
`lung microvascular
`of
`rat
`endothelial cells RLMVEC Transport of
`1 albumin in
`125
`occurred at a rate of 72 fmol
`RLMVEC monolayers
`ffnin ffi
`transport was inhibited
`106 cells
`Albumin
`by cell surface
`depletion of the 60kDa albumin binding
`gp60
`glycoprotein
`of caveolae using methyl
`and
`by disruption
`fficyclodextrin
`gp60 activation by means of gp60 cross linking
`By contrast
`I al
`using primary and secondary antibodies increased 125
`bumin uptake 23 fold At 37°C 125
`Ialbumin
`uptake had a
`time of 10 min and was competitively
`by
`half
`inhibited
`1 M Using a two site model we
`unlabeled albumin
`IC50 ffl
`mal capacity B of albumin
`the affinity KD and maxi
`by Scatchard
`analysis
`uptake to be 087
`M Koi
`M KD2 and 202
`and 933
`and 047 pmo1106 cells Bmaxl
`At 4°C we also observed two popula
`ffl 135 nM 1
`pmo1106 cells Bmax2
`tions of specific binding sites with high KDi
`ffl 16 M affinity
`On the basis of
`of the total and low KD2
`these data we propose a model
`in which the two binding
`and unclustered
`the
`clustered
`gp60
`affinities
`represent
`forms The model predicts that
`in caveo
`fluid phase albumin
`and trans
`lae accounts for
`the bulk of albumin
`internalized
`
`estimated
`
`if
`
`ported in the endothelial monolayer
`
`permeability
`capillary
`min binding glycoprotein
`
`vesicular
`
`transport
`
`caveolae albu
`
`gp60
`
`from morphological
`IS ACCUMULATING
`THERE
`EVIDENCE
`and functional
`studies that albumin is continuously
`exchanged between the microvascular
`and intersti
`by receptor mediated
`compartments
`tial
`transcytosis 8 11 13 1619 23 2729 Recent
`studies show that albumin molecules can associate
`with surface glycoproteins such as gp60 albondin in
`endothelial cells which can activate the transport of
`albumin 2 68 13 19 20 23 25 28 29 The
`
`albumin
`
`signaling pathways mediating transcytosis
`
`are not
`
`its
`
`lial
`
`that
`
`well understood The pathway
`the hetero
`trimeric G protein G and the activation
`of Src kinase
`albumin endocytosis and its
`signaling may activate
`from the luminal
`to the abluminal
`transport
`cell
`surface 1214 27 Interestingly
`albumin transcy
`by antibody induced
`cross link
`tosis was augmented
`ing of gp60 13 2729 These studies suggest that
`under physiological conditions albumin can bind to
`cell surface
`the albumin binding
`pro
`receptors
`teins ABPs and initiate
`transcytosis
`issues concerning the mode of
`However
`important
`and transport
`albumin uptake
`by a
`transcellular
`remain
`unresolved Fluid
`phase transport
`route
`albumin in vesicles or via the paracellular
`pathway
`not be expected
`to be a saturable process
`would
`whereas transport of albumin either bound to recep
`by receptors should be saturable
`tors or regulated
`nature of ABPs such as
`In addition the high affinity
`range 19 25 relative
`gp60 in the nanomolar
`to
`plasma and interstitial
`concentrations
`of albumin
`1 mM implies that 1 albumin uptake and trans
`processesand 2 bound
`cytosis should be constitutive
`albumin may not dissociate from its vesicular carri
`ers upon exocytosis These questions could not be
`previously addressed with any rigor because deter
`minations
`of albumin to the endothelial
`of affinity
`plasmalemma were
`hampered
`binding 2 6 7 19 This masked any saturable and
`the present study we
`specific albumin binding
`In
`of albu
`dependency
`determined the concentration
`on the surface of confluent
`min binding
`endothelial
`of albumin We specifi
`monolayers and transport
`lung microvascular endothe
`cally used cultured
`rat
`cells RLMVEC becausethey were shown by us
`cell surface adsorption of
`to have low nonspecific
`albumin We show that 1 binding
`and uptake
`of
`albumin have saturable and fluid phase components
`2 cellular uptake of albumin is submaximal at phys
`serum albumin
`concentration
`iological
`implying
`it can be further
`increased in response to appro
`signals and 3 gp60 an ABP can activate
`priate
`albumin transport
`
`Address
`
`for
`
`reprint
`
`requests
`
`and other
`
`Minshall University
`
`of Illinois
`
`R D
`correspondence
`at Chicago Dept
`of Pharmacology
`mc 868 835 S Wolcott Ave Chicago
`60612 Email
`rminshuicedu
`
`IL
`
`of this article were defrayed in part by the
`The costs of publication
`of page charges The article must
`be hereby
`payment
`therefore
`18 USC Section 1734
`marked advertisement
`in accordance with
`
`solely to indicate this fact
`
`httpwwwajplungorg
`
`1040060503 $500 Copyright
`
`2003 the American
`
`Physiological
`
`Society
`
`L187
`
`Abraxis EX2014
`Actavis LLC v Abraxis Bioscience LLC
`1PR201701101 1PR201701103 1PR201701104
`
`

`

`Downloaded
`
`from
`
`ajplungphysiologyorg
`
`on
`
`December
`
`30
`
`2011
`
`L188
`
`METHODS
`
`Endothelial Cell Cultures
`
`ALBUMIN ACTIVATED
`
`FLUID PHASE TRANSPORT
`
`488 and 568nm excitation
`lines to detect DAPIAlexa
`350 band pass 385470 nm emission FITCAlexa 488 band
`pass 505550 nm emission and rhodamineAlexa 568 fluo
`rescence long pass 585 nm emission in optical sections
`m thick pinhole set to achieve 1 Airy unit
`
`laser
`
`1
`
`Cell Surface gp60 CrossLinking
`RLMVEC monolayers were washed twice with HEPES
`buffered DMEM at 4°C and incubated for 30 min at 4°C with
`antigp60 antibody 20 gml and then with secondary an
`20 gml for 30 min to crosslink
`tibody goat anti rabbit
`gp60 Controls were treated with the preimmune
`antibody
`20 gml at 4°C for 30 min Cells were rewarmed to 37°C to
`endocytosis 27 To deplete ABP gp60 27 anti
`gp60 antibody was preincubated with cells for 2 h at 37°C
`
`activate
`
`Binding
`
`of 125
`
`IAlbumin
`
`106
`
`Confluent
`
`cell cultures
`
`in six well plates 1012
`cells35 mm were washed twice in 10 mM HEPESbuffered
`DMEM pH 74 and then serum deprived for 2 h by incuba
`tion in DMEM Cells were precooled to 4°C for 30 min and
`1251 albumin in the presence or absence of unlabeled albumin
`in HBSS was added for 30 min at 4°C Unbound
`ligand was
`removed by three washes with icecold HBSS and cells were
`lysed with 1 ml of 50 mM Tris fHCI buffer pH 74 containing
`1 Triton X100 and 05 SDS 13 Cell associated 125 1
`albumin counts were measured in a gamma counter Packard
`Instruments Downers Grove IL
`
`Uptake of 125
`
`IAlbumin
`
`RLMVEC
`Serum deprived
`see
`confluent
`monolayers
`reagents at 37°C for
`above were pretreated with indicated
`Ialbumin
`of 125
`in the pres
`periods before addition
`required
`in HBSS Uptake at
`ence or absence of unlabeled
`albumin
`37°C was allowed to proceed for
`times indicated
`and then
`on ice and washing three times with
`terminated
`by chilling
`icecold HBSS To remove cell surface bound 125
`I albumin
`cells were washed three times with 1 ml of acid wash buffer
`05 M NaCI and 02 M acetic acid pH 25 26 Cells were
`then lysed and counted as described above
`
`lmmunostaining
`
`Transendothelial
`
`121 Albumin
`
`Transport
`
`salt
`
`and 50
`
`gml streptomy
`
`RLMVEC VEC Technologies Rensselaer NY were cul
`tured in high glucose DMEM GIBCO BRL Grand Island
`with 5 fetal bovine serum Hyclone
`NY supplemented
`Logan UT plus 50 Uml penicillin
`previously 4 The cultures were main
`tained in 5 00295 room air at 37°C
`cin as described
`Drugs and Reagents
`All drugs and reagents were obtained from Sigma Chem
`ical St Louis MO unless stated otherwise Hanks
`balanced
`NaHCO3 42 mM and
`solution HBSS containing
`HEPES 10 mM was adjusted
`to pH 74 Bovine
`serum
`fraction V 99 pure endotoxin free cold alcohol
`albumin
`dissolved in HBSS in concentra
`precipitated was freshly
`of 001100 mgml Methylfficyclodextrin
`was dis
`tions
`solved in HBSS Rabbit antibody
`against bovine endothelial
`and labeled with
`gp60 antigp60 antibody was prepared
`elsewhere 25 27 Control
`Cy3 as described
`isotype
`preimmune se
`matched antibody was isolated from rabbit
`rum Monoclonal anticaveolin1
`antibody was obtained from
`Transduction Laboratories Lexington KY Goat anti mouse
`IgG labeled with Alexa 568 or 350 bovine serum albumin
`and cholera toxin subunit BAlexa 594
`Alexa 488 conjugate
`Probes Eugene
`conjugate were purchased
`from Molecular
`OR
`
`Albumin
`
`Iodination
`
`ION Pharmaceuticals
`Labeling of albumin with Na1261
`T 3 The tracer albumin
`was performed
`using chloramine
`formed was purified to 04 free 1251 using Sephadex G25
`fic radioactivity was 03 10
`columns Sigma Chemical Speci
`by 10 trichloroacetic
`Ci g albumin
`determined
`acid pre
`cipitation
`
`Methyl ffCyclodextrin Treatment
`
`Confluent
`
`RLMVEC
`were
`02 nM10 mM in HBSS for 15 min
`methylfficyclodextrin
`washed twice with HBSS and incubated with fresh medium
`tracer albumin
`for the desired periods
`containing
`
`monolayers
`
`incubated
`
`with
`
`in
`
`of albumin gp60 and caveolin1
`Cellular
`localization
`the plasma membrane and plasmalemmal vesicles exposed to
`albumin was determined
`by immunocytochemical
`labeling
`confocal microscopy LSM 510 Zeiss
`and
`laser scanning
`RLMVEC were serum deprived
`for 2 h washed three times
`red free DMEM and
`with HEPESbuffered HBSS or phenol
`exposed to 01 mgml albumin
`gml
`in the presence of 50
`Alexa 488 conjugated albumin 20 gml cholera toxin sub
`andor 35
`unit BAlexa 594 conjugate
`gml Cy3antigp60
`antibody for up to 30 min 13 Cells were then washed three
`times with HBSS fixed with 4 paraformaldehyde
`in HBSS
`and blocked for 30 min in HBSS containing 5 goat serum
`01 Triton X100 and 001 NaN 3 Primary antibody
`label
`at 4°C with anticaveolin1
`ing was performed
`overnight
`antibody 1 gml Coverslips were then washed three times
`for 10 min in HBSS blocked for 30 min with 5 goat serum
`
`and incubated for 2 hat room temperature with fluorescent
`and goat anti mouse secondary an
`labeled goat anti rabbit
`In some cases 4 6diamidino2phenylindole
`dihy
`tibody
`drochloride DAPI
`gml was added to visualize
`the
`using 364
`Confocal microscopy was performed
`nucleus
`
`1
`
`125
`
`well
`
`I
`
`RLMVECs
`were grown
`on
`clear microporous
`polyester
`Transwell membranes 12 mm diameter
`1 cm2 growth area
`m pore size Corning Costar Cambridge MA The
`04
`inserts were filled with a total of 05 ml of incu
`membrane
`Ialbumin
`in the presence or absence of
`bate containing
`unlabeled albumin The lower well was filled with 15 ml of
`incubate of the same osmolarity as the inner well Thus fluid
`levels and osmotic pressure in the upper and lower wells
`and osmotic effects
`were equalized to minimize hydrostatic
`and test agents were added to the upper
`Labeled albumin
`1251albu
`solution and transendothelial
`in equimolar
`was measured at 37°C Aliquots
`of 50
`min permeability
`were sampled from the lower chamber every 1015 min and
`was measured Albumin
`gamma radioactivity
`permeability
`was calculated
`radiolabeled
`albumin
`flux across the cell
`for
`as described elsewhere 5 22 Trichloroacetic
`monolayer
`and SOS PAGE of the tracer al
`analysis
`acid precipitation
`bumin 27 in the abluminal
`chamber showed that
`the radio
`activity measured on the abluminal side of the cell monolayer
`and that
`albumin was not
`remained
`attached
`to albumin
`in the uptake or transport
`
`hydrolyzed
`
`process
`
`AJPLung Cell Mol Physic
`
`VOL 284
`
`JANUARY
`
`2003 wwwajplungorg
`
`

`

`ALBUMIN ACTIVATED
`
`FLUID PHASE TRANSPORT
`
`L189
`
`Downloaded
`
`from
`
`ajplungphysiologyorg
`
`on
`
`December
`
`30
`
`2011
`
`filter
`
`indicating
`in albumin
`
`of
`
`layers grown on Transwell
`inserts received vehi
`fficyclodextrin 02 nM 10
`cle without drug or methyl
`mM for 15 min in the upper chamber
`and tracer
`albumin was added immediately thereafter Methyl
`ffi
`125
`blocked
`1 albumin
`transendothelial
`cyclodextrin
`M Fig 2 The
`10
`permeability with an IC50 of
`of the inhibitor 10 mM reduced
`highest concentration
`permeability of the albumin tracer by 80 from 77
`to 15 fmol ffnin
`the impor
`ff106 cells ffi
`tance of the cellular pathway
`in
`transport
`RLMVEC
`transport by
`albumin
`Regulation of transendothelial
`gp60 Inasmuch
`of gp60 can stimulate
`as activation
`albumin
`cells via caveolae
`in endothelial
`endocytosis
`13 21 27 we determined whether
`gp60 activation
`To
`tracer albumin
`also increased the transport
`com
`prevent
`of the antigen antibody
`internalization
`plex gp60 on the apical cell surface was cross linked
`as described elsewhere 27 using an antigp60 anti
`body for 30 min in cold conditions 4°C Cells were
`rewarmed to 37°C with a solution containing
`1 albumin 25 nM plus unlabeled albumin 15 M
`re
`uptake of the tracer Control
`isotypematched antibody
`in lieu of antigp60
`ceived
`antibody Cross linking of gp60 significantly increased
`permeability 23 fold above the control
`125
`1 albumin
`15 nl ffnin ffi
`value of 38
`Excess unlabeled
`ftMff2
`albumin 1 mM reduced 125
`1 albumin
`permeability to
`06 nl mini ftMff2 Fig 3 in the cells subjected
`12
`to gp60 cross linking To address the dependence of
`of tracer albumin
`on the cell surface
`basal
`transport
`gp60 RLMVEC monolayers were incubated with anti
`for 2 h at 37°C to deplete cell surface
`gp60 antibody
`gp60 9 27 This procedure reduced basal transendo
`to 73
`06 nl
`ftmff2 80 inhibition Fig 3
`
`rapidly
`125
`
`to activate
`
`cultures
`
`125
`
`1 albumin
`
`permeability
`
`thelial
`min ffl
`
`i5
`
`E
`
`4C 75
`
`Time frnin
`
`90
`
`Fig 1 Time course of
`1251 Albumin
`transport
`
`1251a bumin
`
`in rat
`
`transendothelial
`permeability
`was determined
`lung microvascular
`cells RLMVEC
`in
`endothelial
`to confluence
`in Transwell
`grown
`serts Tracer albumin 68 nM 1251a bumin was applied to the apical
`together with 1 5 M or
`1 5 mM free albumin which was
`chamber
`in the basal chamber
`to equalize osmotic pressure and
`also present
`samples from the basal chamber were taken every 1015 min for 90
`min 4 wells per
`time Specific transport
`of 1251 albumin
`incubation
`by 15 mM a bumin was 80 of total
`amount
`125
`inh bited
`transport was cumulative
`1 Albumin
`increas
`clearance
`albumin
`for up to 90 min Data are from 1 experiment which is
`of 3 experiments performed
`
`125
`
`ing linearly
`
`representative
`
`Statistical Analysis
`
`fitting
`
`programs
`
`Data were analyzed by the nonlinear
`least squares curve
`LIGAND
`Elsevier Biosoft and Microcal
`Origin Microcal Software Northhampton MA Student s
`level of P
`ttest was used to compare results at significance
`comparisons were made by ANOVA All sta
`005 Multiple
`tests were made using GraphPad Prism lnstat soft
`ware San Diego CA
`
`tistical
`
`RESULTS
`
`Albumin
`
`Transport
`
`in Endothelial Monolayers
`
`Time course of transendothelial
`For studies
`
`port
`
`of
`
`transendothelial
`
`1251 albumin
`trans
`125 1a 1 b u min
`
`in
`
`filter
`
`if
`
`apicaltobasolateral
`the
`transport
`direction
`RLMVEC were grown to confluence on Transwell
`inserts 1cm2 surface area Experiments
`began when
`the liquid in the upper well was replaced by a warm
`125 1a 1 bu min plus unlabeled
`37°C solution containing
`albumin 15
`M or 01 mgml During
`the 90 min
`period aliquots of media 005 ml
`in the lower well
`were sampled and analyzed for gamma radioactivity
`tracer albumin
`see METHODS Appearance
`of
`in the
`basal chamber vs time described a straight
`line Fig
`1 as predicted
`the backflux
`of tracer
`into upper
`chamber was negligible From the slope of the fitted
`line in Fig 1 we calculated the 125 1a 1 bu min flux of 72
`Excess unlabeled albumin 15
`fmol ffnin ffi
`ffl 06 cells ffl
`flux Fig 1
`mM or 100 mgml blocked 125
`1 al bu min
`between labeled and unlabeled
`competition
`plasmalemmal sur
`at
`the apical endothelial
`
`implying
`albumin
`
`face
`transport The effect
`Cell pathway regulates albumin
`of methylfficyclodextrin
`the cholesterol binding agent
`caveolae 10 on transendothelial
`125
`that disrupts
`albumin permeability was assessed RLMVEC mono
`
`Fi thy 11
`
`ycinolex i
`
`r
`
`M
`
`Fig 2 Inhibitory
`on flux of
`effect of methylfficyclodextrin
`albumin RLMVEC on Transwell
`inserts were preincubated
`for 15
`min with 02 nM 10 mM methylfficyclodextrin
`or vehicle and then
`balanced salt solution HBSS contain
`with 1251 albumin
`in Hanks
`M free a bumin
`ing 15
`for 15 min A dose dependent
`inh bition
`flux from a control value of 77
`03 fmol ffnin
`1251 albumin
`was observed Values are means
`SE from 4 replicates
`each point
`in 1 experiment which is representative
`of 4 experiments
`performed
`
`125
`
`ffl
`
`of
`ffl 06
`
`for
`
`cellsffl
`
`AJPLung Cell Mol Physic
`
`VOL 284
`
`JANUARY
`
`2003 wwwajplungorg
`
`

`

`L190
`
`ALBUMIN ACTIVATED
`
`FLUID PHASE TRANSPORT
`
`Downloaded
`
`from
`
`ajplungphysiologyorg
`
`on
`
`December
`
`30
`
`2011
`
`at
`
`calization
`
`ffl 202 pmo1106 cells From these data we deter
`Bmax
`mined the total albumin
`unlabeled
`uptake labeled
`forms as a function of albumin concentration Fig 5 C
`The cellular
`uptake of albumin was dependent
`on al
`bumin concentration
`region of concentra
`the steepest
`and 1Off3 M albu
`tion dependency was between 1Off5
`in Fig 5C predicts an EC50 of
`min The smooth curve
`M and saturation
`3 mM albu
`100
`of transport
`min
`Con focal fluorescence imaging of albumin uptake We
`the uptake of albumin
`in caveolae by colo
`visualized
`forms of albumin
`of
`fluorescent
`cholera
`toxin subunit B and antigp60 antibody Cholera toxin
`subunit B was used as a specific marker
`for caveolae
`gang lioside GM1
`because it
`labels the caveolaespecfic
`14 gp60 was previously
`shown to be associated with
`caveolae 13 After 30 min of
`endothelial
`incubation
`with these fluorescent probes at 37°C cells were acid
`washed to remove residual
`cell surface probe fixed
`and stained with the nuclear marker DAPI 1 gml or
`plus Alexa 350 labeled sec
`anticaveolin1
`antibody
`ondary
`antibody
`High resolution
`images
`confocal
`10 m optical
`in Fig 6A show internal
`thickness
`to
`and Cy3gp60 antibody
`ized Alexa 488 albumin
`gether with caveolin1
`near the apical
`immunostaining
`staining of gp60 and albumin
`cell surface Coincident
`three probes were apparent
`and colocalization
`of all
`in
`the overlay In other experiments fluorescent albumin
`was coincubated with fluorescent cholera toxin subunit
`B Figure 68 shows the confocal
`images of internalized
`Alexa 594 cholera toxin subunit B and Alexa 488 albu
`min together with DAPI The fluorescence of albumin
`and cholera toxin was coincident
`in the merged image
`albumin s association with caveolae
`indicating
`To address the effects of methyl fficyclodextrin
`on
`endothe
`albumin
`uptake and caveolin1
`distribution
`cells were pretreated with 10 mM methyl fficyclo
`incubated with HBSS containing Alexa
`and
`dextrin
`
`lial
`
`2e
`
`75
`
`90
`
`125
`
`1511
`Time m
`I a lbu min
`Fig 4 Time course of endothelial
`uptake Confluent
`RLMVEC were incubated for 590 min 6 wells per incubation
`time
`M albumin
`with 228 nM 1251a bumin
`and 15
`to quantify
`total
`or with 15 mM unlabeled
`a bumin
`nondis
`uptake F Total uptake of 1251 albumin
`to quantify
`125 1a bumin
`placeable
`in
`at 15 min and again at 75 min
`creased with time peaking initially
`10 min Data are representative
`of 4 separate experi
`half
`time ffl
`ments
`
`uptake
`
`777
`
`Fig 3 60kDa albumin binding
`protein gp60dependent
`1251albu
`in RLMVEC RLMVEC
`min transport
`monolayers were washed
`DMEM at 4°C and incubated for 30 min
`twice with HEPESbuffered
`with antigp60 antibody 10 gml at 4°C and with secondary anti
`10 gml for 30 min to induce cross linking
`body goat anti rabbit
`10 gml and
`Controls were treated with
`preimmune
`antibody
`secondary antibody Cells were rewarmed
`to 37°C to activate uptake
`of 125I a bumin
`and 15 M unlabeled albumin Crosslinking of gp60
`23 fold from a control value of
`increased 1251 albumin
`permeability
`cell surface gp60 RLMVEC
`38
`To deplete
`15 nl ffnin ffi
`ftrnff2
`DMEM and
`monolayers were washed
`twice with HEPESbuffered
`incubated with antigp60 antibody 10 gml for 2 h at 37 °C Deple
`by 85 1251 Albumin
`Ia lbu m in
`tion of gp60 reduced 125
`transport
`flux was also blocked by 95 when cells were coincubated with 15
`SE n ffl 4
`mM unlabeled albumin 100 mgml Values are means
`by ANOVA
`
`P 001 vs control
`
`Albumin Uptake in Endothelial Cell Monolayers
`
`in cell
`
`initial
`
`thelial
`
`125
`
`uptake RLMVEC
`Time course of
`tracer albumin
`monolayers were incubated
`for various periods with
`M unlabeled albu
`1 albumin in the presence of 15
`125
`min 125
`the cells was
`1 albumin
`accumulation within
`gamma radioactivity
`determined
`by counting
`lysates Lysates were prepared from acid washed cells
`to avoid contamination
`associated
`by tracer albumin
`with the cell exterior The time course of cellular
`125
`uptake was biphasic Fig 4 Specific tracer
`albumin
`uptake 1251 albumin uptake in the presence of 15 M
`in 15 mM albumin reached an
`albumin minus that
`peak 60 fmo1106 cells within
`15 min ap
`cells at 3045 min
`proached a minimum 50 fmo110 6
`rose to a second peak 75 fmo110 6
`and finally
`cells at
`75 min The initial
`slope of the uptake curve was used
`to estimate the rate of tracer albumin
`uptake which
`was 6 fmol ffnin ffi
`this value was within
`ff106 cells ffl
`the same range as 125
`1 albumin transendothelial
`trans
`port of 72 fmol fthin ffl
`see above Endo
`ffl 06 cells ffl
`uptake was markedly
`1albumin
`inhibited
`at
`each time point by excess 15 mM unlabeled albumin
`Fig 4
`
`inhibition
`
`of
`
`tracer
`
`Fig 5A I C50 ffl 115 M Scatchard analysis Fig 58
`into its two com
`used to parse the sigmoidal
`function
`M high affinity
`ponents showed a 087
`component
`ffl 047 pmo1106
`with maximal binding capacity Bmax
`M low affinity
`cells and a 933
`component with
`
`Concentration
`maximal
`duced
`
`biphasic
`
`uptake Sub
`dependence of albumin
`albumin
`of unlabeled
`pro
`concentrations
`albumin
`uptake
`
`AJPLung Cell Mol Physiol
`
`VOL 284
`
`JANUARY
`
`2003 wwwajplungorg
`
`

`

`ALBUMIN ACTIVATED
`
`FLUID PHASE TRANSPORT
`
`L191
`
`488 tagged albumin 50 gml plus unlabeled albumin
`15 M for 30 min Cells were acid washed fixed and
`ie anti
`stained for nuclei DAPI
`and for caveolin1
`caveolin1 monoclonal antibody at
`gml followed by
`goat antimouse Alexa
`568 labeled secondary anti
`body Methylfficyclodextrin
`abolished albumin
`inter
`by plasmalemmal vesicles Fig 7 In addi
`nalization
`
`1
`
`tion methylfficyclodextrin
`surface associated caveolin1
`
`tent with its effect
`
`in disrupting
`
`markedly
`immunostaining
`cell surface caveolae
`
`reduced the cell
`consis
`
`Downloaded
`
`from
`
`ajplungphysiologyorg
`
`on
`
`December
`
`30
`
`2011
`
`Albumin Binding to Endothelial
`
`Cell Surface
`
`125
`
`cell surface labeled
`
`Competition between endothelial
`and unlabeled albumin Agonist
`competition
`binding
`studies were made using RLMVEC in cold conditions
`4°C to abolish tracer endocytosis and internalization
`Cells were incubated with 125
`1 al bu min in the presence
`1 Off3 M for 30
`or absenceof unlabeled albumin 1 Off12
`min Unlabeled albumin reduced the specific binding of
`04 fmo1106 cells The
`1 albumin from 175 to 27
`fitted to the data were 45 nM
`IC50 and Hill
`coefficient
`and 028 respectively suggesting the existence of more
`than one albumin binding site on the RLMVEC surface
`Fig 8A Scatchard analysis of the binding data Fig
`binding sites with af
`two albumin
`8E3 demonstrated
`finity KD values of 135 nM and 16 M respectively
`Bmax values of 242 fmo1106 cells
`and corresponding
`and 24 pmo1106 cells The lower affinity
`site ac
`counted for 98 of the binding
`from cell surface binding
`of albumin
`Displacement
`of RLMVEC
`sites by antigp60 antibody Pretreatment
`for 1 h at 4°C with
`a 1200 dilution
`monolayers
`of
`antigp60 antibody decreased 125
`1 albumin
`binding by
`478 51 n ffl 3 relative to control antibody The
`and the specific antigp60
`albumin
`tracer
`antibody
`competed for the same membrane binding sites Thus
`binding sites detected on RLM
`high and lowaffinity
`VEC may represent different
`states of gp60
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`125
`
`exhibited
`
`RLMVEC monolayers
`a high degree of
`binding because 80 of
`1 albumin
`total
`specific
`binding was inhibited
`by excess unlabeled albumin
`binding site for albu
`a saturable lowaffinity
`Although
`min has been described in bovine pulmonary
`artery
`cells 23 and rat
`tissue microvessel
`endothelial
`fat
`cells 20 the finding
`of a second site of
`endothelial
`much higher affinity
`is a novel observation Competi
`tion studies of 125
`1 albumin
`binding under cold condi
`tions 4°C to prevent
`showed
`tracer
`internalization
`that albumin bound to the endothelial
`cell surface with
`M K02
`constants of 135 nM KDi
`and 16
`affinity
`On the basis of
`site represented 1 of the specific albu
`the corresponding
`Bmax values the
`high affinity
`105 sitescell Schnitzer
`min binding and averaged 5
`and Oh 21 and Tiruppathi
`et al 25 demonstrated
`that an antigp60 antibody displaced the specific bind
`125
`1 albumin
`from rat and bovine pulmonary
`ing of
`microvascular
`our
`endothelial
`cells consistent with
`
`g
`
`E
`
`o
`
`404
`
`20
`
`10
`
`14
`19
`41 n la baled Albumin Al
`
`10
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`AlbAirriln Uptake pmolile cells
`
`ota I Albumin Added M
`
`kinetics
`
`of 125
`
`I albumin
`
`uptake
`
`by unlabeled
`albumin
`101f9
`by 34 nM
`followed
`1 h A
`at 37°C for
`increasing
`
`concentrations
`
`of unlabeled
`
`Scatchard
`
`max2
`
`analysis
`
`by KDi
`
`tracer
`
`Fig 5 Competition
`albumin
`Increasing
`10ff3 M were added to RLMVEC monolayers
`1251 albumin and monolayers were incubated
`I albumin was inhibited
`uptake of 125
`in the presence of
`to be 115 M
`IC50 was calculated
`of free albumin
`concentrations
`1 mM a bumin B
`was achieved with
`near maximal
`displacement
`was best
`analysis of 125
`fit by a
`I albumin
`displacement
`and 13maxl site 1 and KD2
`and
`2 site model
`represented
`site 2 where KD is affinity
`and Bm is maximal
`constant
`binding capacity C total
`uptake calculated from Scatchard
`a bumin
`of combined
`1251a bumin
`albumin
`plus unlabeled
`3 mM added
`shows
`saturation
`of albumin
`uptake with
`uptake
`albumin Data are representative
`of 4 separate experiments
`
`AJPLung Cell Mot Physic
`
`VOL 284
`
`JANUARY
`
`2003 wwwajplungorg
`
`

`

`L192
`
`ALBUMIN ACTIVATED
`
`FLUID PHASE TRANSPORT
`
`A
`
`Downloaded
`
`from
`
`ajplungphysiologyorg
`
`on
`
`December
`
`30
`
`2011
`
`11
`
`I
`
`I
`
`10 pm
`
`Fig 6 Colocalization
`of a bumin with gp60 cholera
`toxin subunit B and caveolin1 A high magnification
`10 m optical
`thickness of RLMVEC
`image
`confocal
`uptake green bottom left
`shows Alexa 488 albumin
`Cy3gp60 ant body uptake red top left and caveolin1
`blue top right
`the apical sur
`immunostaining
`near
`of gp60 albumin and caveolin1
`face Overlay
`images
`shows
`of gp60 and
`bottom right
`coincident
`staining
`as yellow and as white where gp60 and albu
`albumin
`red green
`min are closely associated with caveolin1
`and blue B confocal
`image shows confluent RLMVEC
`staining with Alexa 594 cholera toxin sub
`monolayer
`unit B red top left Alexa 488a bumin green bottom
`blue top right
`left and DAPI
`for nuclear
`localization
`of a bumin
`and cholera
`Note
`colocalized
`fluorescence
`toxin in merged image yellow bottom right suggest
`ing a bumin
`by caveolae
`Images are represen
`uptake
`tative of 4 experiments
`
`AJPLung Cell Mol Physic
`
`VOL 284
`
`JANUARY
`
`2003 wwwajplungorg
`
`

`

`Downloaded
`
`from
`
`ajplungphysiologyorg
`
`on
`
`December
`
`30
`
`2011
`
`ALBUMIN ACTIVATED
`
`FLUID PHASE TRANSPORT
`
`L193
`
`Control
`
`Cyclodextrin
`
`Albumin
`
`Caveolin1
`
`cell
`
`Fig 7 Effects of methylfficyclodextrin
`on albumin
`and
`cyclodextrin
`uptake
`surface
`caveolin1
`staining
`RLMVEC monolayers
`on glass cover
`slips were pretreated with vehicle or 2
`mM methylfficyclodextrin
`for 15 min
`HBSS containing
`50
`incubated
`with
`M
`and 15
`gml Alexa 488 albumin
`30 min fixed
`a bumin
`unlabeled
`for
`and stained with
`anticaveolin1
`anti
`gm1 and then with goat anti
`body 1
`mouse Alexa 568 and DAPI Uptake
`of
`albumin was blocked when
`fluorescent
`cells were first
`treated with methylffi
`cyclodextrin In addition methylfficy
`reduced
`clodextrin
`
`significantly
`
`cell
`Im
`surface caveolin1
`immunostaining
`of 4 experi
`ages are representative
`ments Scale bar 10 m
`
`inhibition
`
`analysis
`
`observations Thus the specific binding sites for albu
`min may include gp60
`Because the measured albumin
`uptake only repre
`sents that albumin
`by the cells
`tracer
`internalized
`which thus was present
`from acid
`in the lysate
`washed cells it
`that uptake data report
`the
`is likely
`endocytosis of the tracer At 10ff8 10ff3 M unlabeled
`albumin we observed progressive
`of tracer
`uptake Fig 5A From Scatchard
`albumin
`Fig 5B we determined the apparent albumin binding
`M low affinity
`constants of the transporter to be 087
`and 93 M ultra low affinity
`The lowaffinity
`uptake
`reported lowaffinity
`value is similar
`to other
`binding
`values 20 23 The low affinity
`binding may
`albumin
`albumin which was
`the tracer
`represent
`initially
`the cell surface such as
`bound to a saturable
`site at
`gp60 and was subsequently
`by endocyto
`internalized
`the ultralowaf
`component may
`sis By contrast
`finity
`re
`albumin
`tracer
`sequestered within
`a
`represent
`stricted membrane compartment with limited access
`caveolae which
`to the extracellular
`fluid Endothelial
`communicate with the extracellular
`via narrow
`fluid
`20 to 30nm necks 17 could qualify
`as such a
`compartment Our evidence for this is as follows
`at
`4°C when internalization
`by endocytosis
`is completely
`component
`the ultralowaf
`was not detected Fig 8 2 at 37°C methylfficyclo
`dextrin which was shown to eliminate
`caveolae Fig
`7 markedly
`all components of 125
`1 al bu min
`inhibited
`uptake Fig 2 and 3 Alexa 488 albumin entered the
`
`inhibited
`
`finity
`
`binding
`
`because the fluorophore was
`caveolar compartment
`vesicles with Cy3
`shown to colocalize in endocytic
`labeled antigp60 antibody Fig 6A and Alexa 594
`cholera toxin subunit B Fig 6B the specific caveolae
`marker 15
`We used methylfficyclodextrin
`to ad
`as a reagent
`between albumin
`dress the relationship
`uptake and
`abolished
`albumin
`transport Methyl fficyclodextrin
`and transport Figs 2 and 7 The albumin
`uptake
`the transfer of albumin
`protocol monitored
`transport
`through the cell monolayer and into the ablumi
`tracer
`chamber
`this assay the backflux
`nal
`of
`tracer
`In
`compartment was mini
`albumin
`from the abluminal
`of the volume in the abluminal
`mal becauseof dilution
`albu
`thus allowing
`a measure of unidirectional
`well
`min flux Moreover we imposed no transendothelial
`thus render
`or oncotic pressure gradient
`hydrostatic
`ing negligible the convective movement of tracer We
`from the methylfficyclodextrin
`of
`sensitivity
`albumin
`that
`transendothelial
`transport
`flux of tracer albumin
`sional paracellular
`was minimal Fig 2
`The earliest
`step in the uptake and transport
`albumin
`cells is the docking
`endothelial
`through
`ABPs 2 6 7 13
`albumin
`on the caveolaeassociated
`1921 25 28 29 Inasmuch as the transendothelial
`flux of tracer albumin was abolished by excess unla
`beled albumin 15 mM the albumin
`internalized
`by
`the mono
`cells and transported
`through
`is displaceable Fig 1 In the presence of a much
`
`the diffu
`in RLMVEC
`
`of
`
`of
`
`infer
`
`endothelial
`
`layer
`
`AJPLung Cell Mol Physic
`
`VOL 284
`
`JANUARY
`
`2003 wwwajplungorg
`
`

`

`L194
`
`ALBUMIN ACTIVATED
`
`FLUID PHASE TRANSPORT
`
`to be 72 fmol albumin ffrrin ffl
`ffl 06 endothelial
`the tracer albumin up
`Importantly we observed that
`take rate of 6 fmol
`from
`ffl 06 cells ffl
`ffrrin ffl
`calculated
`the uptake curve in Fig 4 was
`slope of
`rate
`comparable to the transport
`Analysis of the time course of tracer albumin uptake
`showed peaks at 15 and 75 min Fig 4 A possible
`this complex uptake process is that
`of
`interpretation
`this represents the reuptake of albumin tracer that has
`involving up
`been exocytosed Recycling of the tracer
`could account
`and reuptake
`take extrusion
`for the
`dual uptake peaks
`Antigp60 antibody exposure of cells used to deplete
`the cell surface gp60 27 reduced albumin
`uptake and
`barrier at 37°C by 85
`Fig 3 This finding
`is consistent with a role of cell
`surface gp60 in mediating albumin transport via trans
`cytosis By contrast gp60 activation induced by a much
`briefer exposure to the antigp60 antibody plus a sec
`gp60 27 markedly
`to crosslink
`ondary
`antibody
`125 1a lb u mi n This method of
`increased the transport of
`induced in activating
`cross linking is analogous to that
`receptors which
`growth
`dimerize
`or glyco
`factor
`proteins which clus
`sylphosphatidylinositolanchored
`ter in rafts or caveolae on exposure to specific antibod
`
`Downloaded
`
`from
`
`ajplungphysiologyorg
`
`on
`
`December
`
`30
`
`2011
`
`ies 1 Because cross linking by the antigp60 antibody
`
`at 37°C but
`uptake and transport
`increased albumin
`blocked albumin binding at 4°C it
`and
`is an activating
`on the temperature
`a blocking antibody
`depending
`The data show that
`can compete with
`the antibody
`for binding to gp60 at 37°C as well as 4°C
`albumin
`at 37°C 98 of the internalized
`However
`albumin is
`of plasmalemma vesi
`in the fluid phase compartment
`than receptor bound because it
`cles rather
`required
`albumin
`more unlabeled
`to antagonize
`uptake Fig 5A than 1251
`125
`1 albumin
`competitively
`binding Fig 8A The data in Fig 58 show
`albumin
`has a
`the ultralowaf finity
`uptake of albumin
`that
`Bmax 202 pmolmillion
`much greater
`cells than the
`component 047 pmo1106 cells suggest
`low affinity
`represents 98 of
`fluid phase endocytosis
`ing that
`in RLMVEC Therefore
`the overall uptake of albumin
`
`significantly
`
`the initi

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket