throbber
gp60 is an albumin binding glycoprotein expressed
`by continuous endothelium involved in albumin transcytosis
`
`JAN E SCHNITZER
`Department of Medicine and Pathology Division of Cellular and Molecular Medicine and Institute for
`Biomedical Engineering University of California San Diego School of Medicine
`La Jolla California 920930651
`
`Schnitzer Jan E gp60 is an albumin binding glycoprotein
`in albumin
`expressed by continuous
`endothelium involved
`transcytosis Am J Physiol
`262 Heart Circ Physiol 31
`H246 H254 1992Albumin reduces capillary permeability
`and acts as a carrier for various small molecules Recently we
`identified a 60kDa sialoglycoprotein gp60 on the surface of
`cultured rat microvascular endothelial cells MEG that binds
`albumin and antiglycophorin serum agp We verified that a
`gp recognizes the albumin binding gp60 by affinity purifying
`proteins from MEC extracts using immobilized albumin gp60
`was immunoblotted with agp only when the MEC extract was
`reacted with albumin and not in controls We immunoprecipi
`tated gp60 from biosynthetically radiolabeled MEC lysates and
`from extracts containing
`endothelial surface proteins of iso
`lated rat hearts that were radioiodinated in situ gp60 was
`immunoblotted selectively
`beds
`tissue microvascular
`in rat
`lined with continuous endothelium heart lung diaphragm fat
`skeletal muscle mesentery and duodenal muscularis but not
`cortical brain and not those exclusively
`lined with fenestrated
`liver and small
`or sinusoidal endothelium adrenal pancreas
`intestinal mucosa MEC isolated from rat heart
`lung and
`epididymal fat pad expressed gp60 and bound albumin whereas
`various nonendothelial cells and brain derived MEG did not
`gp60 is an albumin binding glycoprotein expressed specifically
`on the surface of continuous endothelium that binds albumin
`apparently not only to initiate its transcytosis via plasmalem
`mal vesicles but also to increase capillary permselectivity
`capillary permeability membrane
`receptors membrane proteins sialoglycoproteins receptor me
`transport plasmalemmal vesicles
`diated transport
`glycocalyx
`
`rat biological
`
`transport
`
`vesicular
`
`A PRIMARY FUNCTION of the attenuated layer of vascular
`endothelium is to act as a barrier to the transvascular
`in many tissues The
`transport of plasma molecules
`selectivity of the endothelial barrier varies in different
`vascular beds and is strongly dependent on the structure
`and type of endothelium lining the microvasculature
`29 Several pathways exist for the transport of plasma
`molecules across continuous endothelium 1 intercellu
`form
`lar junctions are highly regulated structures that
`the paracellular pathway for the passive pressure driven
`filtration of water and small solutes 2 plasmalemmal
`vesicles transcytose plasma macromolecules apparently
`by shuttling their contents adsorbed from blood from the
`to antiluminal aspect of the endothelium 16
`luminal
`and 3 transendothelial channels which may form tran
`two or more plasmalemmal
`siently by the fusion of
`vesicles may provide a direct conduit for the exchange
`of both small and large plasma molecules 31 Recently
`it has become clear that capillary permeability in many
`vascular beds is also dependent on the interaction of
`these transendothelial transport pathways with the mul
`tifunctional plasma protein albumin 3 6 1114 19
`Albumin binds to the luminal glycocalyx of continuous
`
`H246
`
`The binding of albumin to cultured microvascular en
`dothelium has been quantitated and immunolocalized to
`the surface of cultured rat microvascular
`endothelial
`monolayers 22 Specific albumin binding was shown to
`be saturable reversible competible dependent on cell
`type and cell number and to have a negative cooperativity
`in nature 22 Albumin binding was sensitive to pronase
`but not to trypsin digestion of the cell surface and was
`inhibited significantly by the presence of Limax flavus
`LFA Ricinus communis RCA and Triticum vulgare
`wheat germ WGA agglutinins but not several other
`lectins 23 Recently a group of rat endothelial plas
`malemmal sialoglycoproteins
`situ and in culture 25 One of these sialoglycoproteins
`called gp60 was identified as an albumin binding protein
`because it 1 interacts with albumin conjugated to beads
`23 2 binds RCA LFA and WGA but notuther lectins
`23 25 26 and 3 is sensitive to pronase and sialidase
`but not to trypsin digestion 23 25 Another laboratory
`has also identified gp60 as one of three major albumin
`binding proteins 8 9 The structural and functional
`these albumin binding proteins to one
`relationship of
`is unknown Further characterization
`another
`of gp60
`it apparently contains 0 linked but not N
`showed that
`linked glycans 25 and may also be antigenically related
`to another sialoglycoprotein namely glycophorin 26
`Polyclonal antiserum agp raised against purified
`mouse glycophorin gp3 recognized a 60kDa WGA and
`RCA binding sialoglycoprotein on the Urfa of cultured
`endothelial cells 26 This apparent
`rat microvascular
`recognition of gp60 by agp was inhibited in the presence
`of murine glycophorins
`In this study the specific interaction of gp60 with
`albumin and with agp serum is demonstrated Then a
`gp is used as a probe for gp60 Because albumin binding
`and transcytosis via plasmalemmal vesicles are not ob
`served in the endothelium lining the vasculature of many
`tissues tissue specific expression of gp60 should be ex
`0363613592 $200 Copyright © 1992 the American Physiological Society
`
`endothelium 10 15 19 22 and its binding within
`transport pathways such as plasmalemmal vesicles and
`the introit of intercellular junctions apparently forms a
`molecular filter within these pathways 3 that can elec
`trostatically 20 and sterically 3 21 restrict the trans
`port of water small solutes and macromolecules
`the microvascular wall 6 1114 19 In addition albu
`min is transcytosed across vascular endothelium via plas
`malemmal vesicles 10 15 19 and acts as a carrier for
`such as fatty acids 5 This
`ligands bound to it
`small
`receptor mediated transcytosis of albumin ap
`apparent
`pears to occur selectively in certain tissues with vascular
`beds lined with continuous endothelium 10 28 and is
`
`across
`
`influenced greatly by the ligands bound to albumin 5
`
`has been identified both in
`
`Abraxis EX2013
`Actavis LLC v Abraxis Bioscience LLC
`1PR201701101 1PR201701103 1PR201701104
`
`

`

`ENDOTHELIAL
`
`ALBUMIN BINDING GLYCOPROTEIN GE60
`
`H247
`
`pected if gp60 does indeed function as a physiologically
`significant albumin binding protein Therefore various
`rat tissue and cell extracts were tested using agp for the
`presence of gp60 In addition microvascular endothelial
`cells have been isolated from several organs and grown
`in culture to compare both gp60 expression and albumin
`surface binding These experiments demonstrate 1 the
`specific expression of gp60 only by those cultured endo
`thelial cells that bind albumin and not various other
`cells 2 the presence of gp60 on the surface of vascular
`endothelium both in situ and in culture and 3 the
`selective distribution of gp60 in rat tissues with vascular
`beds lined with continuous endothelium that transcytose
`albumin via plasmalemmal vesicles
`
`METHODS
`
`cells
`
`in culture Male
`Isolation and growth of endothelial
`albino rats SpragueDawley 200250 g were anesthetized with
`ether The heart
`lungs and cortical brain were surgically
`removed from three to five rats were submerged in cold Dul
`beccos modified Eagles medium DMEM supplemented with
`1520 fetal calf serum FCS DMEM+ and each was
`minced in a vial using small sterile surgical scissors For the
`heart only myocardium was used after careful excision of the
`epi and endocardiurn For the lung only peripheral regions of
`the lobes were used Both of these excision procedures are
`designed to eliminate obvious large arterial and venous seg
`and to increase the probability for
`ments of the vasculature
`endothelium After centrifugation
`isolation of rnicrovascular
`for 5 min at 1000 g at 4°C the pellet was resuspended in 2 mg
`from Clostridium histolyticum ne II
`ml of collagenase
`Sigma in DMEM+ at 37°C using five times the tissue volume
`After a 1h incubation the suspension was poured over a sterile
`Nitex monoscreen cloth no 311240xx Tetko Briar Cliff
`Manor NY to filter out
`tissue clumps The filtrate was cen
`trifuged for 5 min at 1000 g and the pellet was resuspended in
`DMEM+ containing 20 Agm1 of heparin 100 1Jm1 of penicil
`lin G 100 agm1 of streptomycin sulfate and 10 bovine aortic
`endothelium conditioned media The cells were plated onto T
`25 flasks Corning Corning NY for culture at 37°C with 5
`CO2 in air After several days when confluency was reached
`the cells were examined and sorted on a fluorescent activated
`cell sorter using uptake of acetylated low density lipoprotein
`labeled with 11 clioctadecy13333tetramethylindocarbo
`cyanine perchlorate DiIAcLDL as in Refs 22 and 30 Madin
`Darby kidney cells MDCK cells were used as a negative
`endothelial cells that exhibited uptake
`control Microvascular
`of DiIAcLDL and the mixture of other cells in the heart and
`internalize DiIAcLDL were
`lung preparations that did not
`replated separately and grown in culture using the above media
`without heparin After 24 h this medium was replaced for all
`future culturing with DMEM+ for the noriendothelial cells and
`with DMEM+ with retinal derived growth factor for the endo
`thelial cells Microvascular endothelial cells isolated from rat
`epididymal fat pads RFC were grown and plated as previously
`described 22
`
`lysate from cultured cells After
`Immunoblotting of total cell
`cell monolayers their proteins were
`washing the confluent
`solubilized directly with cold solubilization buffer SB contain
`ing 017 M trishydroxymethyDarninomethane Tris HC1 pH
`68 3 wtvol sodium dodecyl sulfate SDS 12 volvol
`2 M urea and 3 niM EDTA in double
`distilled water as described previously 25 After incubation in
`boiling water for 10 min a lysate volume equivalent of 106 cells
`was processed for SDSpoiyacrylamide
`gel electrophoresis
`PAGE and the separated proteins were electrotransferred
`onto Immobilon filters Millipore Bedford MA as in Refs 25
`
`fimercaptoethanol
`
`covalently
`
`and 26 Strips of these filters were immunoblotted with rabbit
`serum and any bound immunoglobulin G IgG was detected
`conjugated to alkaline phos
`IgG antibodies
`using anti rabbit
`phatase as in Ref 26
`Immunoprecipitation of gp60 radiolabeled
`biosynthetically
`using tritiated sugars About 5 x 106 RFC cells were plated onto
`two T75 flasks After 15 h 10 mCi of 263Hrnannose
`45
`Cimmol Amersham Arlington Heights IL mixed in 3 ml of
`DMEM+ was added to one flask of cells or 10 mCi of 6311
`galactose 20 Cimmol ICN Costa Mesa CA combined with
`1 mCi of 6311glucosamine 27 Cimmol ICN mixed in 3 ml
`of DMEM+ was added to another flask of cells After 3 days
`when the cell monolayer reached full confluency the cells were
`washed with 10 ml of DMEM 3 times 1 mm at 4°C lysed
`with 5 Triton X100 and 1 SDS in phosphate buffered
`saline PBS and finally scraped from the flask After a 10
`min spin at 4°C 1000 g the supernatant was used for MI
`munoprecipitations overnight with agp as described in Ref
`25 The precipitates were analyzed by SDSPAGE and were
`visualized by fluorography as per Ref 1
`in situ The
`Immunoprecipitation of gp60 radioiodinated
`endothelial
`luminal surface proteins of the heart vasculature
`were radioiodinated in situ using Na1 and microspheres were
`and glucose oxidase as
`coated with lactoperoxidase
`described previously 25 Proteins were extracted from 200 mg
`of heart tissue by mincing the tissue in 500 pl of 5 Triton X
`100 and 1 SDS in PBS at 4°C The lysate was centrifuged at
`13000 g for 1 min at 4°C and 100 pl of the supernatant
`tissue
`extract was mixed overnight at 4°C with 380 al of PBS and 20
`al of rabbit antiserum The ensuing immune complexes were
`then precipitated with protein A conjugated to Sepharose beads
`as in Ref 25 The proteins bound to the beads were solubilized
`directly with 150 td of cold SB kept
`for 10
`in boiling water
`min and analyzed by SDSPAGE followed by autoradiography
`as described previously 25
`Imniunoblotting of tissue extracts Male albino rats Sprague
`Dawley 200250 g were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal
`injection of ketamine 100 mgkg and xylazine 33 mgkg
`The chest was opened through a median sternotomy Through
`a needle inserted into the left ventricle and after the right
`atrium was cut
`for outflow purposes the vasculature was per
`fused with DMEM Irvine Scientific Irvine CA at a mean
`pressure of 60 mmHg first
`for 5 min at 37°C and then for 10
`min at 10°C The heart liver cortical brain epididyrnal fat
`duodenum diaphragm and
`pad kidney adrenals pancreas
`skeletal muscle were excised and $00 mg weight
`gastrocnemius
`wet of each tissue was minced in 1 ml of SB at 4°C For the
`duodenum the muscosa of the intestinal wall was separated
`under visual
`from the muscularis by scraping
`inspection
`through a dissecting microscope In some cases only lung tissue
`was excised after perfusion through the right ventricle
`at a
`mean pressure of 20 mmHg with left atrial outflow The lysates
`at 13000 g for 1 mm at 4°C and the super
`were centrifuged
`natants tissue extracts were processed equivalently for pre
`parative SDSPAGE and immunoblotting as described above
`In the lung and fat pad preparationsIthe centrifugation step
`did nor pellet all of the tissue debris and a top layer of fatty
`material was present and had to be carefully aspirated before
`the soluble material could be removed In a few preparations
`before tissue excision the vasculature was perfused for 3 min
`directly with a protease inhibitor cocktail containing 400 41
`ml benzamidine 10 agm1 leupeptin 10 agrtil pepstatin A 65
`agnil aprotinin 10 Agm1 chymostatin 100 agirril Ophenan
`throline and 350 agm1 phenylmethylsulfonyl
`fluoride The
`presence of protease inhibitors did not alter the observed re
`sults
`Immunoblotting of gp60 after interaction with immobilized
`albumin A 1 Triton X3 00 soluble fraction from the RFC
`in 90 ethanol at 20°C The
`
`cells was precipitated overnight
`
`

`

`H248
`
`ENDOTH ELIAL ALBUMIN BINDING GLYCOPROTEIN GP60
`
`filters
`
`albumin binding glycoprotein gp60 and not just another
`surface glycoprotein of similar apparent molecular mass
`Albumin was adsorbed to filters and then air dried to
`immobilize the protein to the filters After blocking the
`filters they were exposed to an RFC cell extract contain
`ing gp60 and then washed Proteins were eluted from the
`strips separated by SDSPAGE electrotransferred to
`and then immunoblotted with agp Controls
`included 1 exposing the cell extract to filters alone or
`to transferrin immobilized to filters and 2 testing the
`material desorbed from the transferrin and albumin fil
`ters that had not been exposed to the cell extract Figure
`1 shows that agp detected a single 60kDa protein only
`in eluates of the albumin adsorbed strips interacted with
`the RFC cell extract The eluates from all of the control
`strips were negative These results indicate that 1 gp60
`interacts preferentially with albumin 2 agp does in
`in the RFC cell extracts
`deed recognize gp60 present
`and 3 agp can now be used with confidence as a probe
`for the albumin binding glycoprotein gp60
`Endothelial expression of gp60 immunoprecipitation
`with agp of endothelial glycoproteins radiolabeled biosyn
`thetically in culture Although it
`that gp60 is
`is clear
`located on the surface of vascular endothelium in culture
`23 25 the biosynthetic origin of gp60 is uncertain
`Figure 2 shows that gp60 can be immunopreeipitated
`specifically with agp from lysates of RFC cells that had
`been biosynthetically radiolabeled with tritiated sugars
`gp60 was radiolabeled successfully with a mixture of 6
`311galactose and 63IIglucosamine but not with 26
`3IImannose alone To ensure that gp60 was indeed ex
`pressed during each radiolabeling procedure both radi
`lysates were subjected to SDSPAGE and
`olabeled cell
`the separated proteins were electrotransferred onto fil
`ters that were immunoblotted with agp An equivalent
`signal for gp60 was detected in both cases data not
`shown These results indicate that gp60 is indeed ex
`
`Filters
`
`adsorbed with
`Albumin
`Transferrin
`PBS alone
`to
`Filters exposed
`Cell extract
`
`+
`
`+
`
`+
`
`+
`
`+
`
`+
`
`+
`
`GP60+
`
`pellet was washed once using 70 ethanol and then resus
`pended in PBS The suspension was centrifuged at 13000 g for
`5 min and the supernatant was used as the cell extract Strips
`of Immobilon or nitrocellulose filters 1 X 025 in were incu
`bated for 4 h at room temperature in 1 PBS alone 2 10 mg
`ml of albumin in PBS or 3 10 mgml of transferrin in PBS
`h with blocking solution 5 Blotto and 01 Nonidet P40 in
`After air drying for at least 1 h all strips were quenched for 1
`
`PBS and then incubated overnight at room temperature in 05
`ml of a 150 dilution of the RFC cell extract in blocking solution
`Some of the albumin strips and transferrin strips were also
`incubated in blocking solution without cell extract as additional
`controls All strips were washed three times for 5 min with
`01 Nonidet P40 in PBS and then cut
`into small pieces
`Proteins were eluted using 100 ml of SB in a boiling water bath
`for 15 min separated by SDSPAGE on a minigel apparatus
`BioRad and then electrotransferred onto Immobilon filters
`at 40 V for 15 h The filters were immunoblotted with agp as
`described above
`
`RESULTS
`
`gp60 interacts with both agp and albumin Recently
`we have shown that agp does interact with an RCA
`and WGAbinding 60kDa sialoglycoprotein 26 present
`on the surface of cultured microvascular
`endothelium
`derived from RFC Other work 23 has implicated an
`RCA and WGAbinding 60kDa glycoprotein as an al
`bumin binding protein on the RFC cell surface Because
`these data strongly suggest that agp is interacting with
`the albumin binding protein gp6O we attempted to in
`hibit albumin binding to the surface of cultured RFC cell
`rnonolayers using an IgG fraction of agp isolated with
`immobilized protein A as in Ref 26 The cell monolayers
`were first exposed for 10 mm to the IgG fraction of agp
`tgm1 Then 19 albumin was added to
`up to 100
`a final concentration of 2 geml and the usual
`achieve
`binding assay was performed 22 23 Although this IgG
`fraction did interact with the 60kDa protein by immu
`lysates 26 it did not affect
`noblotting of RFC cell
`albumin binding to the RFC cell surface data not
`shown suggesting different binding sites for the anti
`body and albumin Therefore it became necessary first
`to ensure that agp is indeed interacting with the 60kDa
`1 The observation
`that agp even at high concentrations does not
`interfere with albumin binding to the cell surface suggests that albumin
`and agp may interact with gp60 at different binding sites within the
`molecule This postulation is supported by our recent
`investigation
`attempting to define the epitope recognized by agp that indicates that
`agp reacts with a peptide region located apparently in the endodomain
`of the protein unpublished observations Conversely albumin binding
`to the endothelial cell surface is expected to be via the ectodornain of
`gp00 An alternate explanation is supported by our immunofluorescence
`on permeabilized and nonpermeabilized RFC cells which
`studies
`showed only mild labeling of the cell surface with agp data not
`shown Because the antibody was raised against an antigen denatured
`by SDSPAGE it
`is not surprising that agp apparently interacts
`poorly with the native form of gp60 seen on the cell surface The
`epitope may be masked in its native state andor require some degree
`of gp60 denaturation before antibody recognition Furthermore since
`our results indicate that the epitope lies in the endodomain of gp60 it
`may like glycophorin interact with cytoskeletal
`proteins this inter
`action may interfere with antibody binding to the permeabifized
`cells
`staining with agp pre
`Unfortunately
`immunofluorescence
`the poor
`cludes more exact
`immunolocalization studies at the electron micro
`scopic level on either cultured cells or tissue These immunolocalization
`studies must be performed with a new antibody that recognizes 060
`under more native conditions
`
`Serum
`
`IM IM IM iM
`
`IM NJ
`interaction of 60k1
`Fig 1 Specific
`0 with albu
`min immobilized on filters and subsequent detection by immunoblot
`ting with antiserum against glycoprotein agp Filteis were incubated
`with albumin in phosphate buffered saline PBS transferrin in PBS
`or PBS alone as indicated for each lane above and then air dried to
`immobilize the proteins onto filters As indicated
`strips were then
`either exposed or not exposed to rat epidymal fat pad RFC cell extract
`in a blocking solution Proteins were eltited from each strip separated
`by SDSPAGE and electrotransferred onto Immobilon filters Strips
`containing eluted proteins are shown above and were
`immunoblotted either with nonimmune NI andor immune agp IM
`serum Bound immunoglobulin C IgG was detected using anti rabbit
`IgG antibodies
`conjugated to alkaline phosphatase as described previ
`ously 25 Gp60 was detected only after interaction of cell extract with
`albumin filters and not in various controls
`
`of these filters
`
`

`

`ENDOTHELIAL
`
`ALBUMIN BINDING GLYCOPROTEIN GP60
`
`H249
`
`IMMUNOPRECIPITATION
`MORI RUM
`WITH ANTI
`tL
`Mn re
`C
`
`66
`gP60
`
`45
`
`INS
`
`Evl
`
`N I
`NI
`Fig 2 Biosynthetically radiolabeled glycoproteins of RFC cells irn
`munoprecipitated with agp serum RFC cells were radiolabeled with
`either 1Hinannose Man or both 3Hgalactose and 3111giticosamine
`GG as descibed in METHODS Lysates from these cells were subjected
`to immunoprecipitation with either nonimmune NI or immune IM
`agp rabbit serum Immunoprecipitates were separated by SDSPAGE
`on a 515 gradient gel and visualized by fluorography Only gp60 was
`detected specifically with agp The band found at 45 kDa is considered
`since it was detected both in nonimmune serum and
`to be nonspecific
`to a lesser extent in immune serum
`
`pressed by vascular endothelium in culture Furthermore
`the lack of incorporation of 263111mannose
`into gp60
`is consistent with our previous findings based on direct
`lectin affinity chromatography 25 that
`and sequential
`suggest that rat gp60 contains 0linked glycans but ap
`parently not N linked glycans
`Endothelial cell isolation from rat tissues Fluorescence
`activated cell sorting was used to isolate microvascular
`endothelial cells from a mixture of cells derived from a
`collagenase treatment of cortical brain heart and lung
`tissues see METHODS The specific ability of endothelial
`cells to internalize DiIAcLDL was used to isolate endo
`thelial cells from nonendothelial cells 22 30 Those
`lacked uptake of DiIAcLDL were also saved
`cells that
`from the heart and lung preparations After sorting all
`cells were replated grown in culture for several passages
`and checked periodically for DiIAcLDL uptake using
`either the fluorescence activated cell sorter or simple
`fluoresence microscopy of the cells grown on slides as
`in Ref 22 Figure 3 shows the fluorescence
`described
`profile of DiIAcLDL uptake of a typical cell preparation
`The cells initially isolated from tissue have a bimodal
`cell distribution with considerable variation in cell size
`and fluorescence intensity Most of the cells have fluo
`rescence intensity far greater than the MDCK cells neg
`to internalize DiIAcLDL A
`ative control and appear
`second group of cells has a fluorescence intensity more
`comparable to the MDCK cells especially when cell size
`is considered The top 20 of the cells with the greatest
`intensity and the bottom 20 of the cells
`fluorescence
`with the lowest
`fluorescence intensity were collected
`separately using the cell sorter These cells after growth
`in culture were examined for DiIAcLDL uptake once
`again and as shown in Fig 3B the endothelial cells that
`on the first sort are now unimodal
`in
`were positive
`fluorescence in
`distribution with considerably
`greater
`tensity than the negative control Meanwhile the other
`isolated cells shown in Fig 3C which should be nonen
`in origin also appeared to have a unimodal cell
`dothelial
`in this case their fluorescence was
`distribution however
`equivalent to the negative control Many of the endothe
`lial cell preparations were also checked periodically by
`immunofluorescence as described in Ref 22 and in each
`case stained positively for other endothelial markers
`enzyme or factor VIII
`such as angiotensinconverting
`data not shown This approach has allowed us to isolate
`
`Cell Size
`Fluorescence
`Intensity
`Fig 3 Profile of fluorescence activated cell sort of cultured cells de
`rived from a rat heart preparation Cells were isolated from 4 rat hearts
`see METHODS These cells were
`and grown in culture until confluency
`incubated with 11 dioctadecy13333 tetramethylindocarbocyanine
`lipoprotein DiIAeLDL
`low density
`perchloratelabeled acetylated
`and processed for fluorescence activated cell sorting as described pre
`viously 20 30 Cell size and fluorescence intensity profiles of cells are
`shown as a function of cell number Profiles of initial
`population of
`heart derived IHD cells are given in A MDCK cells were also exam
`ined as a negative control Twenty percent of cells with highest and
`fluorescence intensity were isolated separately using cell sorter
`lowest
`and then grown in culture After 3 passages these 2 cell populations
`for DiIAcLDL uptake and their profiles are shown
`were reexamined
`in B rat heart endothelial RHE cells are derived from those cells
`fluorescence intensity of DilAcLDLpositive cells and C
`with highest
`heart mixture HM of cells grown from bottom 20 of cells with
`fluorescence of RHE cells was com
`flourescence When total
`pared with that of MDCK cells >98 of RHE cells internalized more
`DiIAcLDL than any control cells On the other hand HM cells
`as MDCK cells To get a
`exhibited same degree of
`population of cells that lacked DiIAcLDL uptake ie were devoid of
`endothelial cells we found it necessary to passage
`least twice
`
`lowest
`
`fluorescence
`
`cells in culture at
`
`and grow in culture endothelial cells from the rat heart
`lung and brain and nonendothelial cells from the heart
`and lung
`Immunoblotting lysates of cultured cells The proteins
`from the organ derived cells isolated and grown in cul
`ture as described above were solubilized separated by
`SDSPAGE electrotransferred to filters
`and then im
`munoblotted with agp and nonimmune serum Proteins
`from RFC cells acted as a positive control Figure 4
`shows that gp60 was present only in the lysates of
`endothelial cells isolated from the heart and lung but not
`from the cortical brain For the heart and lung prepa
`rations only the DiIAcLDLpositive endothelial cells
`expressed gp60 whereas the mixture of nonendothelial
`cells probably consisting of fibroblasts pericytes and
`or smooth muscle cells neither internalized DiIAcLDL
`nor appeared to express gp60 These results indicate that
`under the conditions used here to isolate and grow these
`cells microvascular
`endothelia from the heart and lung
`but not the brain express gp60 in culture whereas non
`endothelial cells from the heart and lung do not We
`have also checked
`by immunoblotting several specific
`
`gp60 can also be immunoblotted specifically with agp using lysates
`from other cultured endothelium derived from sheep pulmonary artery
`bovine aorta fetal bovine heart ATCC microvessels of pig atrium
`and human umbilical vein unpublished observations
`
`

`

`H250
`
`ENDOTHELIAL
`
`ALBUMIN BINDING GLYCOPROTEIN GP60
`
`Tissues
`
`Cells
`
`DilAcLIL
`
`GP60
`
`Im
`
`NI
`
`IM Ni
`
`ivi
`
`IM
`
`NI
`
`IM IM
`
`from rat heart
`
`Serum
`NI
`Fig 4 Differential expression of gp60 in rat mit coy ascular endothelial
`cells isolated from different tissues RFC cells along with microvascular
`endothelial cells isolated from rat brain RBE heart RIIF and lung
`RLE were processed for
`immunoblotting overnight with a 1500
`dilution of either nonimmune NI or immune 1M egp serum In
`addition a mixture of nonendothelial cells isolated
`BM and lung LM were also immimoblotted with agp In each case
`a lysate equivalent of 106 cells was loaded onto a preparative gel Both
`endothelial and nonendothelial
`cells were passaged 3 times in culture
`isolation and separation
`by fluorescence activated
`after their
`cell sorting Heart and lung endothelial cells both internalized DiI
`AcLDL and expressed gp60 whereas nonendothelial cells did neither
`Gp60 was not detected in lysates of cultured brain endothelium
`
`initial
`
`types grown in culture Normal rat
`nonendothelial
`cell
`kidney fibroblasts from American Type Culture Collec
`tion ATCC NRK49F that bind albumin poorly 22
`and rat aortic smooth muscle cells from ATCC A10
`were negative for gp60 expression data not shown
`Therefore in the cultured cells tested so far the expres
`sion of gp60 appears to be specific for certain endothelial
`cells
`Selective albumin binding to rat cultured endothelial
`cells Because the data given above indicate that gp60
`expression is limited to only certain endothelial cells rat
`heart endothelial RHE RFC and rat lung endothelial
`RLE but not rat brain endothelial RBE cells the
`binding of albumin to these cells should vary in accord
`ance with gp60 expression if gp60 does indeed play a role
`in albumin binding Rat serum albumin RSA was ra
`dioiodinated and the binding of 25I RSA to the surface
`of these cultured cells was compared using 01 mgm1 of
`I RSA as described previously 22 Because the RFC
`cells bind RSA and were used originally to characterize
`the kinetics of albumin binding to cultured microvascular
`endothelium 22 they acted as a positive control As
`shown in Fig 5 I RSA binding was 1015 times
`for the RLE RHE and RFC cells than for the
`greater
`RBE cells This small amount of binding of albumin to
`the RBE cells is comparable to that observed previously
`for rat fibroblasts 22 This selective albumin binding
`to certain cultured endothelial cells agrees well with the
`the RLE RHE and RFC cells
`above observation that
`expressed gp60 but the RBE cells did not In addition
`the increase of 4050 in 19 RSA binding observed for
`the RLE and RHE cells over the RFC cells correlates
`well with the greater expression of gp60 by these cells
`see Fig 4
`Presence of gp60 on the surface of microvascular endo
`thelium in situ Most of our previous work has focused
`on using in vitro systems to study molecular interactions
`at the surface of the vascular endothelium Recently we
`have examined the extent of phenotypic drift caused by
`cell culture by performing intravascular radioiodinations
`of endothelial surface proteins to compare those proteins
`identified in situ with those in culture 25 Here we
`
`114
`
`egyzrez
`
`RHE
`RFC
`RBE
`RLE
`Fig 5 Differential albumin binding to cultured rat endothelial cells
`RFC cells along with microvascular endothelial cells isolated from rat
`brain RBF heart RBE and lung RLE were examined for their
`ability to bind radioiodinated rat serum albumin RSA using 01 mg
`in an in vitro assay described previously 20 For each
`ml
`type mean value of binding observed from 4 cell
`endothelial cell
`monolayers in dishes is expressed as ng106 cells with error bars
`denoting calculated SD values Data were also normalized relative to
`RFC cells and are expressed as a percentage which is written above or
`wit bin columns representing each cell
`type
`
`205
`
`116
`
`97
`
`66
`
`4$
`
`29
`
`IM
`NI
`Fig 6 Intravascular radioiodinated surface proteins of heart vascular
`endothelium immunoprecipitated with agp serum separated by SDS
`PAGE and visualized
`by autoradiography Heart extracts with 19
`luminal surface proteins 24 were subjected to
`labeled endothelial
`immunoprecipitation with either nonimmnine NI or immune IM
`agp serum Because it appears that this type of radioiodination in situ
`is limited to luminal surface of endothelium 25 these results indicate
`that a go recognizes intravascularly radioiodinated gp60 that is located
`on luminal surface of heart microvascular endothelium in situ Molec
`ular mass standards used were myosin 205 kDa ozgalactosidase 117
`kDa phosphorylase B 97 kDa bovine albumin 66 kDa egg albumin
`45 kDa and carbonic anhydrase 29 kDa
`
`show that gp60 is indeed a molecular component of the
`endothelial glycocalyx in situ by using agp to immuno
`gp60 from heart extracts con
`precipitate radiolabeled
`taining microvascular endothelial proteins that have
`been radioiodinated in situ As described previously 25
`the luminal surface proteins of the myocardial microvas
`cular endothelium were radioiodinated by intravascular
`perfusion of Na125I and small microspheres conjugated
`with both lactoperoxidase and glucose oxidase As shown
`
`

`

`ENDOTHELIAL
`
`ALBUMIN BINDING GLYCOPROTEIN GP60
`
`H251
`
`Table 1 Tissue expression of albumin binding proteins comparison with albumin binding
`and transport by vascular endothelium
`
`Vascular
`Bed
`
`Permeable
`to Albumin
`
`Albumin in
`Plasmalernmal Vesicle
`
`Albumin Binding Protein°
`
`gp60
`
`gp30
`
`gp18
`
`Albumin
`
`Effects
`
`++++
`++++
`
`tr++
`++
`++
`++
`++
`
`ND
`ND
`
`ND
`ND
`
`++
`
`ND
`ND
`ND
`ND
`
`ND
`
`ND
`ND
`ND
`
`ND
`
`Continuous endothelium
`Heart
`Lung
`Brain
`Fat
`Skeletal muscle
`
`Diaphragm
`Mesentery
`Duodenal musculature
`Fenestrated endothelium
`Adrenal
`Pancreas
`Duo

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket