throbber
C Taylor Francis
`
`row Group
`
`Taylor
`
`AUG DEVELOPMENT
`AND INDUSTPt Ai
`44AFIMACY
`
`Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy
`
`ISSN 03639045 Print 15205762 Online Journal homepage httowwwtandfonlinecomloiiddi20
`
`Conteol of Crystal Growth in Drug Suspensions
`1 Design of a Conteol Unit and Application to
`Acetaminophen Suspensions
`
`K H Ziller
`
`H Rupprecht
`
`To cite this article K H Ziller H Rupprecht 1988 Conteol of Crystal Growth in Drug
`Suspensions 1 Design of a Conteol Unit and Application to Acetaminophen Suspensions Drug
`Development and Industrial Pharmacy 141517 23412370 DOI 10310903639048809152019
`
`To link to this article httpdxdoiorg10310903639048809152019
`
`I
`
`I
`
`MOODIl
`
`Published online 20 Oct 2008
`
`aSubmit your article to this journal 0
`
`1111 Article views 77
`
`51 View related articles 0
`
`ft Citing articles 10 View citing articles 0
`
`Full Terms Conditions of access and use can be found at
`
`httpwwwtandfonlinecomactionjournalInformationjournalCode=iddi20
`
`Download by American Red Cross Tom Poison
`
`Date 11 May 2017 At 1 1
`
`1 5
`
`Abraxis EX2050
`Actavis LLC v Abraxis Bioscience LLC
`1PR201701101 1PR201701103 1PR201701104
`
`

`

`DRUG DEVELOPMENT
`
`AND INDUSTRIAL
`
`PHARMACY 141517 23412370 1988
`
`CONTROL OF CRYSTAL GROWTH
`IN DRUG SUSPENSIONS
`
`1 DESIGN OF A CONTROL UNIT AND APPLICATION TO
`
`ACETAMINOPHEN SUSPENSIONS
`
`KH Ziller and H Rupprecht
`
`Department of Pharmaceutical
`
`Technology
`
`University of Regensburg
`
`Universitatsstr
`
`31
`
`D8400 Regensburg FRG
`
`ABSTRACTS
`
`A monitor system is described for the control of particle
`
`growth by crystallization in real pharmaceutical
`
`Dedicated to ProfDr E Nurnberg on the occassion
`
`of his 60th birthday
`
`2341
`
`Copyright © 1988 by Marcel Dekker Inc
`
`

`

`2342
`
`ZILLER AND RUPPRECHT
`
`suspensions based on the measurement of drug concentration
`
`in the liquid phase in contact with the drug crystals The
`
`control unit consists of a thermostated vessel containing
`
`the drug suspension and a monitoring circuit
`including a
`dedector ie refractive index UV absorption The
`is recorded in
`concentration of
`the liquid supernatant
`
`parallel with the actual
`
`temperature Typical concentration
`
`time curves indicate any dissolution or crystallization if
`temperature cycling AT 1 10K is applied on the
`
`suspensions
`
`It
`
`is demonstrated by acetaminophen
`
`crystals that after
`
`decreasing the temperature the crystal growth appears
`significantly impeded even by very small amounts of PVP 3
`ppm mol mass 180000 The polymer did not
`
`influence the
`
`rate of dissolution of
`
`the crystals at higher
`
`temperature
`
`Surfactants reduce the protective
`
`action of PVP on crystal
`
`growth in particular anionic surfactant which neutralize
`
`the protective action totally
`
`Crystal growth can be successfully inhibited by substances
`
`which are irreversibely adsorbed
`
`to the crystal surface by
`
`specific interactions with their functional groups and a
`
`polymer structure of high molecular mass
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Particle growth by crystallization is one of
`
`the most
`
`destabilizing physical processes in drug suspensions
`
`

`

`CONTROL OF CRYSTAL
`
`GROWTH
`
`IN DRUG SUSPENSIONS
`
`I
`
`2343
`
`It
`
`is promoted by temperature changes during storage
`
`especially if
`
`the solubility of
`
`the drug is strongly
`
`dependent
`
`on temperature In this case the crystallised
`
`drug may dissolve with increasing temperature
`
`followed
`
`by particle growth when the temperature decreases
`
`again Supersaturated
`
`drug solutions are then formed
`
`which stimulate crystallization Crystal growth
`
`however
`
`favours rapid sedimentation and may finally
`
`lead to non redispersable sediments or caking 1
`
`Several approaches
`
`are described in the literature both
`
`to monitor
`
`these processes and to impede
`
`crystallization from supersaturated solutions by the
`
`addition of polymers surfactants
`
`and dyes 27 We
`
`describe here a control unit designed to monitor
`
`crystal growth and dissolution even
`
`in highly
`
`concentrated
`
`suspensions
`
`The
`
`influence of additives on
`
`crystallization processes can also be evaluated
`
`CONTROL OF SUSPENSION STABILITY
`
`1 Measurement of particle size
`
`In a suspension the total volume of the solid phase is
`
`the sum of the individual volumes of the single
`particles ie crystals
`Any dissolution or crystallization process will
`
`change
`
`this solid phase volume On cooling a drug suspension
`
`

`

`2344
`
`ZILLER AND RUPPRECHT
`
`particle growth from supersaturated solution may be the
`
`preferred process with the suspended crystals acting
`
`as nuclei Consequently the particle size of
`crystals increases This can be evaluated from mea
`
`the
`
`surements of the particle size distribution in the
`suspension 28910
`
`Different
`
`techniques
`
`have been described for example
`
`the Andreasen pipette 9 the Coulter Counter 2810
`determination from microscopic images 4 However
`
`or the semi or full automatic particle size
`
`the
`
`analysis of representative samples from pharmaceutical
`
`concentrated suspensions is more or less an arbitrary
`
`procedure
`
`Any pretreatment of
`
`the suspensions such as
`
`shaking redispersion etc as well as the sampling
`
`location in the suspension are not standardized
`
`An alternative approach is the study of crystal growth
`
`on single crystals mounted under
`
`the microscope
`
`Although this method is an elegant principle it maybe
`
`restricted to fundamental aspects such as the
`
`individual growth of different crystal
`
`faces
`
`changes
`
`in crystal habit etc It does not account
`
`for the
`
`mutual
`
`influence of solid particles in real
`
`suspensions In addition experimental difficulties
`
`arise from the need for proper mounting of the crystals
`
`

`

`CONTROL OF CRYSTAL
`
`GROWTH
`
`IN DRUG SUSPENSIONS
`
`I
`
`2345
`
`and from necessity of a constant and equal flow of the
`feeding solution around the crystal 41112
`
`2 Control of solute concentration in the liquid phase
`
`Sekikawa 12 proposed control of crystallization in
`suspensions by monitoring the concentration of the drug
`
`in the liquid phase In a closed suspension system
`
`dissolution and crystallization must change
`
`the
`
`concentration of
`
`the solute in the liquid phase In
`
`this way coprecipitation and particle growth from
`
`ethanolic acetaminophen solutions have been controlled
`
`by intermittant measurement of
`
`the drug concentration
`
`in the supernatant
`
`liquid
`
`This method can however
`
`be improved by continously
`
`controlling the drug concentration in the liquid phase
`
`of a suspension both under
`
`isothermal and temperature
`
`cycling conditions thereby simulating the stress on
`
`storage at varying temperatures
`
`According to Varney 14 the rate of crystal growth is
`on a variety of parameters such as the
`dependent
`solubility of the drug ie the saturation
`concentration and their temperature dependence
`
`the
`
`

`

`2346
`
`ZILLER AND RUPPRECHT
`
`degree of supersaturation the temperature difference
`
`on storage and the frequence of
`
`temperature cycling
`
`Any mechanical stress such as stirring must also be
`
`considered Particles smaller than 1 Am may
`
`additionally exhibit Ostwald ripening
`
`3 Description of
`
`the Suspension Control Unit
`
`The control unit was designed to measure drug
`
`concentration in the liquid phase and simultaneously
`
`the temperature in the suspension Depending on the
`
`applied monitor system the concentration of additives
`
`influencing the crystallization can also be determined
`
`The main elements and their function are shown in
`
`Fig 1 A graduated Erlenmayer flask with a ground glass
`
`stopper containing connecting passages
`
`is used as a
`
`liquid phase to which the solid drug is added
`
`The
`
`the
`
`stirrer vessel 1 This contains 50100 ml of
`suspension is then stirred by a magnetic stirrer 2 at
`ca 300 RPM driven by a magnetic water turbine 4
`Feddeler Essen FRG Sliding bearings can adjust
`
`stirrer
`
`shank in the stopper
`
`The Erlenmeyer flask is
`
`contained in a thermostat
`temperature adjustment
`than t 011 and is equipped with heat
`
`better
`
`the
`
`

`

`FIGURE 1
`System for monitoring the drug concentration in the liquid
`
`phase of suspensions during temperature cycling
`
`1 stirrer vessel
`
`2 stirrer with bearing
`
`axis magnetic pin
`
`8
`
`9
`
`peristaltic pump
`
`septum for sample
`
`injection and
`
`sampling an
`
`bubble removement
`
`3 heat exchanger
`
`TM
`
`temperature
`
`heating and cooling
`
`control
`
`4 turbine for the magnetic
`
`Therm thermostat
`
`for
`
`stirrer drive
`
`5
`
`temperature sensor
`
`6 frit
`
`temperature
`
`control of
`
`the
`
`suspension
`
`7 membrane
`
`filter
`
`Th
`
`thermostat
`
`for the
`
`monitor system
`
`NO
`
`monitor for drug
`
`concentration
`
`Rec
`
`twin channel
`
`recorder
`
`

`

`2348
`
`ZILLER AND RUPPRECHT
`
`exchangers
`
`Braun Frigomix 1496Thermomix
`
`1480 BKV unit
`
`for heating and cooling 3 supplied by a
`= Therm
`A Pt 100 sensor 5 connected
`to a Knauer control unit
`TM controlls the temperature in the suspension
`
`A circuit
`
`is then established to control drug andor
`
`additive concentrations
`
`The
`
`liquid phase is
`
`transported through Teflon and Isoversinic tubes by
`
`means of a peristaltic pump Gilson Miniplus 8 The
`G3 or G4 6 to trap
`
`circuit starts with a glass frit
`
`course solid particles
`
`The liquid then passes
`
`through
`
`a membrane filter
`
`dpore 8 Am cellulose nitrate
`Sartorius 7 and a HPLCseptum injector Perkin
`Elmer 9 so as to remove fine particles and bubbles
`
`before passing the monitor The monitors applied were
`
`selected from HPLC equipment
`
`a differential
`
`refractometer Knauer
`
`single beam UV
`
`spectrophotometer Gilson spectrochrome U Shimadzu UV
`
`102 and UV 10002 and double beam spectrophotometer
`UV 210A Shimadzu were used
`
`The
`
`flow through cells in the monitor are maintained at
`
`temperatures
`
`10K higher
`
`than the upper limiting
`
`temperature of any cycle thermostatsIn this way
`
`is avoided
`For UV
`crystallization in the cuvettes
`measurements quartz cells 110 mm are used Hellma
`
`

`

`CONTROL OF CRYSTAL
`
`GROWTH
`
`IN DRUG SUSPENSIONS
`
`I
`
`2349
`
`The
`
`following parameters have to be considered when
`
`selecting an appropriate monitor
`
`linearity between the
`
`signal and the drug concentration controlled by
`
`calibration the sensitivity the signaltonoise
`
`ratio and the thermic drift
`
`compensation
`
`Due
`
`to the
`
`high concentrations in saturated drug solutions it
`
`is
`
`better
`
`to measure concentration at a wave length apart
`
`from the absorption maximum In this case the validity
`
`of
`
`the Lambert Beer law has to be carefully evaluated
`
`Temperature and concentration signals are recorded in
`
`parallel versus time as is demonstrated in Fig 2
`
`The following criteria are prerequisites for an
`
`adequate control of a suspension system
`
`a dissolution and crystallisation can be directly
`
`controlled by drug concentration without dilution
`
`steps
`b the rates of dissolution and crystallization are
`
`relatively high
`c polymorphism and pseudo polymorphism are excluded
`d interaction between drug crystals and excipients
`
`are well defined or can be independently
`
`determined
`e influences on crystal growth can be independently
`measured by other methods 471113
`
`

`

`HYMIZ
`
`GMV
`
`1HDU1ddflU
`
`MIN
`
`tom
`
`110
`
`2101
`
`3104
`
`06
`
`5110
`
`30
`
`61
`
`715
`
`0
`
`CONC
`
`CYC1
`
`followingfigures
`
`the
`
`hatchedareaalsoi
`
`n
`
`the
`
`curveover
`
`Temperature
`
`ml
`
`5mg100
`
`mg100m
`
`l
`
`10
`
`04
`
`02
`
`K17
`
`K30
`
`PVP
`
`PVP
`
`bAdditive
`
`aAdditive
`
`3
`
`ml
`
`100
`
`naqueousacetaminophensuspensions
`
`Temperaturecyclingi
`
`FIGURE2
`
`TIME
`
`50
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`01
`
`0
`
`MIN
`
`TIME
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`01
`
`0
`
`3
`
`6r
`
`rf
`
`CYCj
`
`11 11
`
`ZOO
`
`110
`21O
`
`A
`
`1I iI01
`
`51T
`
`O
`
`40
`
`100
`
`II
`
`71
`
`Normomu
`
`PVP
`
`OF
`
`CONC
`
`ONT
`
`MIJ
`
`G100
`
`CvC
`
`CONC
`H
`
`ACETAMINOPHEN
`
`21H
`
`1261
`
`22uj
`
`11q30
`
`a
`
`136
`
`133
`
`C
`
`git
`
`25
`
`24
`
`23
`
`11
`
`b
`
`a
`
`

`

`CONTROL OF CRYSTAL
`
`GROWTH
`
`IN DRUG SUSPENSIONS
`
`I
`
`2351
`
`4 Design of Temperature Cycling
`
`14g of drug particle size 10
`
`50 Am are necessary
`
`for one experiment suspended in 50100 ml
`
`liquid
`
`phaseThe experiments are carried out at
`
`room
`
`temperature
`
`AT ± 10K
`
`according to the temperature
`
`conditions during distribution and storage of drug
`
`preparation 60 min proved to be a reasonable compromise
`
`for one temperature cycle Considering heating and
`
`cooling rates the length of
`
`temperature plateau phases
`
`at
`
`the upper
`
`limiting temperature to attain
`
`equilibrium and a cooling period limited to 30 min
`
`5The Control of Crystal Growth of Acetaminophen
`
`in the
`
`Presence of PVP
`
`The
`
`function and sensitivity of the control unit was
`
`evaluated by means of model suspensions as to evaluate
`
`and predict suspension stability Acetaminophen was
`selected as a drug model and polyvinylpyrrolidone PVP
`
`as an effective additive to inhibit crystal growth
`41215
`
`In Fig 2a2b dissolution and crystallization of
`
`acetaminophen
`
`in aqueous
`
`suspensions during temperature
`
`cycling are demonstrated PVPs of different molecular
`
`

`

`2352
`
`ZILLER AND RUPPRECHT
`
`mass were added
`
`to the suspensions
`
`In the diagrams the
`
`temperature
`
`curve over
`
`the hatched area and the
`
`concentration of
`
`the drug in the liquid phase versus
`
`the time are given Locating marks indicate the points
`
`of
`
`temperature reversal
`
`The number of temperature
`
`cycles are listed in the column cyc and the
`the added PVP in the column cone
`
`concentration of
`
`During the cooling periods the rate of crystallization
`
`obviously decreases with increasing amounts of PVP in
`
`the suspensions Significant
`
`influences both on
`
`dissolution and crystallization are exhibited by PVP
`
`m 43000 and PVP K90 mol mass m
`K30 mol mass
`180000Fig 38 The PVP K17 with its lower molecular
`
`mass of m 9000 has only a minor influence on these
`
`processes
`
`The number of temperatur cycles also influences the
`
`effectiveness
`
`of PVP Starting with the 4th cycle
`
`supersaturated solutions are obtained during the
`
`dissolution period related to the solubility at
`
`the
`
`upper limiting temperature The concentration passes
`through a maximum after 810 min then declines to the
`
`saturation concentration Simultaneously the inhibiting
`
`action on crystallization at the lower limiting
`
`temperature appears more pronounced
`
`and
`
`supersaturated suspensions are stabilized over several
`
`

`

`K9
`
`0
`
`PVP
`
`f5m
`
`g
`
`bSingularadditiono
`
`CONTROL OF CRYSTAL
`
`GROWTH
`
`IN DRUG SUSPENSIONS
`
`UI
`
`5 55 5
`
`CONC
`
`mg100m
`
`l
`
`15
`
`02
`
`K90
`
`PVP
`
`aAdditive
`
`naqueousacetaminophen
`
`Temperaturecyclingi
`
`3
`
`ml
`
`100
`
`suspensions
`
`TIMEM
`
`IN
`
`ZO50
`
`3I0
`
`20
`
`10
`
`0
`
`MIN
`
`TIME
`
`50
`
`i
`
`LO
`
`30
`
`20
`
`T
`
`T
`
`10
`
`0
`
`FIGURE3
`
`126
`
`130H
`
`cc
`
`cc a
`
`133
`
`0
`
`1361
`
`3 0 0
`
`1401
`
`261
`
`251
`
`241
`
`231
`
`221
`
`211
`
`b
`
`a
`
`

`

`2354
`
`ZILLER AND RUPPRECHT
`
`hours This is also demonstrated by temperature cycling
`
`at constant concentrations of PVP after the second
`cycle 5 mg100 ml PVP K90 Fig 313 Only a small
`
`decrease
`
`in concentration is observed during repeated
`
`cooling periods
`
`In Fig 4 acetaminophen
`
`concentrations are shown
`
`obtained during the cooling periods of temperature
`
`cycling after 10 and 25 min respectively
`
`They are
`
`contrasted with the increasing amounts of PVP K17 and
`
`PVP K90 semilogarithmic plot added to the system An
`
`effective inhibition of crystallization is indicated by
`
`high drug concentrations in the supernatant at
`
`low PVP
`
`concentrations and by a small difference between the
`
`concentration curves at 10 min and 25 min It
`
`is thus
`
`confirmed that PVP K 90 is a potent crystallization
`
`inhibitor With increasing frequency of temperature
`
`cycling the inhibiting action of PVP K90 is reduced
`
`to
`
`a fairly constant
`
`level
`
`even after a further increase
`
`of polymer concentration identical values were
`
`obtained by PVP K 30 not shown in this diagram
`
`is concluded
`From these experiments it
`that
`approximately 3mg PVP = 30 ppm K30 or K90 is the most
`effective amount of polymer to inhibite the
`
`crystallization of acetaminophen
`
`in suspensions
`
`

`

`CONTROL OF CRYSTAL
`
`GROWTH
`
`IN DRUG SUSPENSIONS
`
`I
`
`2355
`
`c
`
`AT 253 °C
`UPPER TEMPERATURE
`
`LIMIT
`
`br
`
`A
`
`I
`
`0
`
`oI
`
`4
`
`1
`
`02
`
`1
`05
`
`PVP K17
`
`0
`64
`6o AFTER 10 MIN
`lir AFTER 25 MIN
`AFTER 10 MIN COOLING
`
`PVP K90
`
`05 AT
`207 °C
`LOWER TEMPERATURE
`
`LIMIT
`
`10
`
`5
`
`10
`
`POLYMERE
`
`CONC MG10 0 ML
`
`FIGURE 4
`
`140 J
`
`135
`
`130
`
`71
`
`D9
`
`CONC
`
`ACETAMINOPHEN
`
`Temperature cycling in aqueous acetaminophen
`
`suspensions Drug concentration in the supernatant
`
`liquid phase in the presence of
`
`o
`
`A
`
`o
`
`A
`
`PVP K17 10 min
`
`PVP K90 10 min
`
`0
`
`A
`
`0
`
`A
`
`PVP K17 25min
`
`PVP K90 25 min
`
`

`

`2356
`
`ZILLER AND RUPPRECHT
`
`4nitroacetanilide was introduced for comparsion as a
`
`drug model The stucture of this molecule differs in
`the paraposition to the acetamino groups ie the OH
`group is replaced by a nitro group In this way the
`
`influence of single functional groups on drug
`
`crystallization in the presence of PVP can be evaluated
`Fig 5 The
`crystallization of 4nitroacetanilide appears
`
`inhibitory effect of PVP K50 on the
`
`to be
`
`smaller compared with acetaminophen However
`
`BSA a
`
`polymer of the proteintype is also effective in crystal
`
`growth inhibition of 4nitroacetanilide at
`concentration of 20 mg100 ml = 200 ppm This may be
`due to the inability of the nitro group to form
`
`hydrogen bonds as a donor
`
`leading to weaker
`
`interactions with PVP
`
`7 Influence of
`
`low molecular pyrrolidones bovine serum
`
`albumin and surfactants
`
`on acetaminophen crystallisation
`
`71 Addition of 1methylpyrrolidone and piracetam
`
`The crystallization of acetaminophen during the cooling
`
`period in temperature cycling is not significantly
`
`influence by either 1methylpyrrolidone or piracetam
`Fig 6 Both substances
`
`are compounds of similar
`
`

`

`CONTROL OF CRYSTAL
`
`GROWTH
`
`IN DRUG SUSPENSIONS
`
`I
`
`2357
`
`0N
`
`0
`
`NC CH3
`
`CYCI
`
`40MG100ML
`BSA
`
`200MG100ML
`PVP K 30
`
`WITHOUT
`ADDITIVE
`
`2
`
`2
`
`1
`
`2 7
`
`5
`
`ACETAMINOPHENCONC
`
`190
`
`20
`
`18
`
`0
`
`<105
`w
`
`16
`
`141
`
`12
`
`0
`
`15
`
`30
`
`45 TIME MIN
`
`FIGURE 5
`
`Temperature cycling in aqueous 4nitroacetanilide
`
`suspensions 100 ml 3 Additives PVP K30 and BSA
`
`structure as the pyrrolidone monomers Even relatively
`
`high concentrations of
`
`these additives compared with
`
`PVP are ineffective During the third cycle PVP K30
`
`was added and was fully effective even in the presence
`
`of both additives These experiments confirm the
`results obtained by Metha 11 He reported that
`
`

`

`2358
`
`ZILLER AND RUPPRECHT
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`CH21
`Jn
`
`0
`
`` CYC
`PVP K 30 s
`20 MG 100ML
`
`3
`
`0
`
`H2C CNH2
`
`N
`
`0
`
`CH3
`
`MRACETAM1METHYL
`PYRROLIDON200MGMOOML
`
`WITHOUT
`
`ADDITIVE
`
`CONCG100ML1
`
`ACETAMINOPHEN
`
`125 I
`
`120 1
`
`1151
`
`20
`
`18
`
`Ui
`
`CC
`
`16
`
`10sLU
`CC
`
`X
`
`LU
`
`16
`
`1001
`
`0
`
`15
`
`30
`
`45 TIME MIN
`
`FIGURE 6
`
`Temperature cycling in aqueous acetaminophen
`
`suspensions 50 ml 3
`
`piracetam and 1methylpyrrolidone respectively added
`
`in the second cycle
`
`

`

`CONTROL OF CRYSTAL
`
`GROWTH
`
`IN DRUG SUSPENSIONS
`
`I
`
`2359
`
`vinylpyrrolidone does not
`
`influence the crystallization
`
`of sulfathiazole which is also a low molecular mass
`
`compound of similar structure A specific influence of
`
`the pyrrolidone ring system on the protective action of
`
`PVP can therefore be ruled out
`
`72 Addition of BSA
`
`Bovine
`
`serum albumin BSA was selected as an example
`
`of a polymer which shows strong interactions with a
`great number of drugs in aqueous solution 1519 In
`Fig 7 the influence of BSA on acetaminophen
`
`concentration in the liquid bulk phase during
`
`temperature cycling of
`
`the suspension is given This
`
`polymer
`
`inhibits the crystallization of acetaminophen
`
`to the same extent as PVP
`73 Combinations of PVP and surfactants
`
`Surfactants are reported to influence crystallization
`
`by adsorption and solubilization effects
`29102122 They are also widely used in suspension
`and preservatives 25
`formulations as wetting agents
`We studied their possible interference with both the
`inhibiting polymer 24 and the crystal surfaces during
`
`

`

`2360
`
`ZILLER AND RUPPRECHT
`
`FIGURE 7
`
`Temperature cycling in aqueous acetaminophen
`
`suspensions in the presence of BSA 50 ml 3
`
`temperature cycling experiments with acetaminophen
`
`suspensionsThe
`
`crystallization of acetaminophen is not
`
`influenced by the nonionic polyoxyethylene
`
`polypropylene copolymer Pluronic F68
`
`

`

`CONTROL OF CRYSTAL
`
`GROWTH
`
`IN DRUG SUSPENSIONS
`
`I
`
`2361
`
`In combination with PVP K17 the rate of crystallization is
`
`only slightly increased by the presence of
`
`Fig 8
`
`the surfactant
`
`The nonionic PEG10oleylether and hexadecylpyridinium
`
`cations both reduce the inhibiting effect of PVP on
`crystallization Fig 9a and b These surfactants are
`reported to exhibit no significant
`interactions with
`PVP in solution 2526 although they may be adsorbed
`the drug In this way they
`to the crystal surfaces of
`
`can disturb the structure of
`
`the protective polymer at
`
`the crystal surface
`
`Hexadecylsulfate
`
`however neutralizes the protective
`
`action of PVP on acetaminophen crystallization almost
`completely Fig 9b This anionic surfactant
`aggregates with PVP in the aqueous phase 27 thus
`preventing the PVP from establishing protective layers
`
`on the drug crystals
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`Specific and strong interactions between functional
`
`groups of the drug and a polymer are obviously a
`
`necessary but not a sufficient prerequisite to
`
`inhibit
`
`the crystallization from supersaturated
`
`solutions in drug suspensions
`
`This is demonstrated by
`
`

`

`2362
`
`ZILLER AND RUPPRECHT
`
`CYC 10 MG100 ML
`P V P K17
`
`0 1
`
`0 2
`
`0 MG100 ML
`PLURONIC
`F68
`
`WITHOUT
`ADDITIVE
`
`125
`
`120
`
`115H
`
`110H
`20 105
`
`73
`
`18
`
`100
`
`095
`
`160
`
`TEMPERATURE
`
`14
`
`12
`
`o
`
`1s
`
`30
`
`TIME MIN
`
`FIGURE 8
`
`Temperature cycling in aqueous acetaminophen suspension
`
`50 ml 3 in the presence of PVP K17 and pluronic F68
`
`the low molecular pyrrolidone compounds which are more
`
`or less ineffective in influencing crystallization The
`
`second essential property of a protective substance
`
`seems to be the formation of an polymer adsorbate on
`
`the surface of
`
`the drug crystals This impedes
`
`the
`
`

`

`CONTROL OF CRYSTAL
`
`GROWTH
`
`IN DRUG SUSPENSIONS
`
`I
`
`2363
`
`C
`
`b
`
`CYC
`
`PVP IC 30
`
`10OLEYL
`ETHER
`
`1 WITHOUT
`ADDITIVE
`
`ICY C
`2 PVP X 30
`
`1 HEXA
`
`DECYLPYRIDINION
`CHLORIDE
`134NA HEXA
`plcrksuLFATE
`
`jJ WITHOUT
`ADOITIVE
`
`00
`
`0
`
`0
`
`120i
`
`1101
`
`100
`
`°C
`
`TEMPERATURE
`
`20
`
`18
`
`16
`
`141
`
`12
`
`0
`
`15
`
`30 TIME MIN
`
`0
`
`15
`
`30
`
`TIME MIN
`
`FIGURE 9
`
`Temperature cycling in aqueous acetaminophen
`
`suspensions 50 ml 3 in the presence of mixtures of
`PVP K30 20 mg100 ml with
`
`a PEG10oleylether
`b hexadecylpyridinium chloride and sodium
`
`hexadecylsulfate
`
`respectively
`
`

`

`2364
`
`ZILLER AND RUPPRECHT
`
`FROM
`DETERMINED
`SUPERNATANT
`rt 11
`
`LJ
`
`0
`
`o
`
`0
`
`o
`
`FROM
`DETERMINED
`mrsnn nyr rI171ACITIMAI
`HLAJWID41C Urnrvoi
`two
`
`301
`
`1
`
`20
`
`1010
`
`Z 7
`
`ADSORBEDAMOUNT
`
`20
`
`60
`10
`EQUILIBRIUM CONC MG100ML
`
`BO
`
`FIGURE 10
`
`Adsorption of PVP 14CK1 9K17 150 onto
`
`acetaminophene
`
`crystals
`
`approach of drug molecules from solution onto free
`
`spaces of
`
`the crystal
`
`lattice
`
`In the series of pyrrolidone compounds applied to
`
`acetaminophen
`
`suspensions only the high molecular mass
`
`polymers PVP K50
`
`PVP K90 show a pronounced
`
`protective action The adsorption of PVP K17 on
`
`acetaminophen crystals is shown in Fig 10 The
`
`

`

`CONTROL OF CRYSTAL
`
`GROWTH
`
`IN DRUG SUSPENSIONS
`
`I
`
`2365
`
`Langmuirian nature of
`
`the isotherm indicates that
`
`the
`
`adsorption is reversible in contrast
`
`to the high
`
`molecular mass polymers It can be imagined that
`
`the structures of PVP and BSA adsorbates formed on
`from the good solvent water 28 are
`responsible for the crystallization inhibiting effect
`
`acetaminophen
`
`The polymer is hydrated to a great extent
`
`in the
`
`adsorbate and attached to the crystal surface by some
`so called trains Fig 11 Water molecules
`
`segments
`
`remain therefore in permanent contact with the
`
`crystal surface On raising the temperature the
`
`dissolution process can start
`
`immediately and drug
`
`molecules dissolved from the crystal can diffuse
`
`through the adsorbate into the bulk liquid phase
`
`The
`
`inhibiting action of PVP on crystallisation is
`
`presumably a kinetic effect
`
`PVP inhibits the
`
`introduction of drug molecules from solution into the
`
`crystal
`
`lattice by occupying the adsorption sites which
`
`are also free lattice sites The adsorption of polymers
`
`onto solids is known to become progressively more
`irreversible with increasing chain length 28 This is
`also the case if only weak or medium adsorption forces
`
`are present on a single adsorption site For the
`
`desorption of a polymer molecule the activation energy
`
`of desorption must
`
`be simultaneously achieved for every
`
`

`

`2366
`
`ZILLER AND RUPPRECHT
`
`Dissolution and Crystallization
`
`in the Presence of an Adsorbed Polymer
`
`polymer
`
`hydration shell
`
`drug solution
`
`crystal
`
`temperature
`
`increase
`
`decrease
`
`+ +
`
`drug solubility
`
`polymer adsorption
`
`polymer solvation
`
`Consequences
`
`dissolution by water
`
`crystal growth inhibited
`
`molecules in contact
`
`adsorbed polymer must
`
`between adsorbed poly
`
`be replaced from active
`
`mer molecules
`
`crystal sites
`
`FIGURE 11
`
`Schematic sketch of the polymer adsorbate on a drug
`
`crystal and the influence of
`
`temperature cycling on the
`
`adsorbate
`
`

`

`CONTROL OF CRYSTAL
`
`GROWTH
`
`IN DRUG SUSPENSIONS
`
`I
`
`2367
`
`single contact point
`
`In acetaminophen suspension only
`
`a gradual
`
`replacement of polymer contact sites on the
`
`crystals by drug molecules is envisaged
`
`The adsorbed
`
`polymer may form a mechanical barrier against
`
`crystallization which has increasing protective action
`
`by increasing the polymer chain length and
`
`consequently
`
`the irreversible nature of adsorption
`
`When applying this method to suspensions of drugs which
`
`form polymorphs or pseudopolymorphs
`
`it must be
`
`considered that the more stable crystal form may be
`
`formed as well as different crystal habits This could
`
`influence the results of
`
`the temperature cycling
`
`experiments
`
`The method we presented in this paper may be a useful
`
`tool
`
`to detect and characterize the influence of
`
`additives on drug crystallization in suspensions Even
`
`very small amounts
`
`in the ppm range
`
`show their
`
`protective action It may succesfully be applied in the
`
`optimization of suspension stability and in the control
`
`of
`
`these dosage forms
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1 Florence AT and D Attwood in
`Physicochemical Principles of Pharmacy Macmillan
`
`Houndmills Basingstoke London 1981
`
`

`

`2368
`
`ZILLER AND RUPPRECHT
`
`2 Carless JE and AA Forster JPharmPharmacol
`18 1966 697708
`IA AR Ebian SA Khalil and MM
`3 Moustafa
`Motawi JPharmSci 64 1975 14851489
`4 Simonelli AP SC Mehta and WI Higuchi
`JPharmSci 59 1970 633637
`5 Nath BS and RV Gaitonde IndJPharm 37
`1975 7780
`6 Badawi AA AA ElSayed and I Haroun
`PharmInternational 56 1977 16
`7 Nuernberg E and P Kohl PharmazZtg 124 1979
`523529
`8 Carless JE MA Moustafa and HDC Rapson
`20 1968 630638 639645
`JPharmPharmacol
`9 Hasegawa J and T Nagai ChemPharmBull
`1958 129137
`10 Higuchi WI
`and PK Lau JPharmSci
`1962 10811084
`11 Mehta SC PD Bernardo WI Higuchi
`and AP
`59 1970 638644
`Simonelli JPharmSci
`12 Mehta SC PHDThesis Univ Michigan 1969
`13 Sekikawa H M Nakano and T Arita
`Chem Pharm Bull 26 1978 118126
`14 Varney G JPharmPharmacol 19 Suppl 1967
`19s 23s
`15 Motawi AM SA Morbuda F El Khawas and KL
`28 1982 211215
`El Khodery Acta PharmTechnol
`
`51
`
`6
`
`

`

`CONTROL OF CRYSTAL
`
`GROWTH
`
`IN DRUG SUSPENSIONS
`
`I
`
`2369
`
`16 Davison C and PK Smith
`J Pharmacol Exptl Therap 133 1961 161170
`17 Eichman ML DE Guttman Q van Winkle and
`EP Guth JPharmSci
`51 1962 6671
`18 Keen PM BritJPharmacol 26 1966 704712
`19 Lindenbaum A and J Schubert
`jPhysChem 60
`1956 16631665
`20 Patel NB P C Sheen and LE Taylor
`JPharmSci 57 1968 13701374
`21 Michaels AS and AR Colville JPhysChem 64
`1960 1319
`22 Michaels AS and FW Tausch
`1961 17301734
`23 Higuchi WI Swarbrick J Norman FH Simonelli
`AP and A Martin Particle Phenomena
`Dispersions in Remingtons Pharmaceutical
`Sciences 17th ed Geunaro AR Mack
`Publishing comp Easton Pa 1985 pp 301
`24 Saito S Polymer Surfactant
`Interactions in
`Nonionic Surfactants MJ Schick ed Marcel
`
`jPhysChem 65
`
`and Coarse
`
`Dekker
`
`Inc
`
`New York Basel 1987 pp 881
`
`25 Saito S KollZuZPolymere 249 1971 1096
`
`1100
`
`26 Saito S and K Kitamura JCollIntSci
`1971 346353
`
`35
`
`

`

`2370
`
`ZILLER AND RUPPRECHT
`
`27 Saito S T Taniguchi and K Kitamura
`JCollIntSci
`154164
`28 Tadros TF in Polymer Colloids Buscall R
`Corner T and Stageman JF ed Elsevier Applied
`SciPubl
`New York 1985 pp 105
`London
`
`37 1971
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket