throbber
Paclitaxel Stent Coating Inhibits Neointimal Hyperplasia at
`4 Weeks in a Porcine Model of Coronary Restenosis
`Alan W Heldman MD Linda Cheng PhD G Mark Jenkins MD Phillip F Heller PhD
`DongWoon Kim MD Melvin Ware Jr LAT Cynthia Nater BS Ralph H Hruban MD
`Banafsheh Rezai MD Benjamin S Abella MD Katherine E Bunge MD James L Kinsella PhD
`Steven J Sollott MD Edward G Lakatta MD Jeffrey A Brinker MD
`William L Hunter MD Jeffrey P Froehlich MD
`
`stents remain
`BackgroundDespite limiting elastic recoil and late vascular
`remodeling after angioplasty coronary
`vulnerable to restenosis caused primarily by neointimal hyperplasia Paclitaxel a microtubulestabilizing drug has been
`smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation contributing to neointimal hyperplasia We
`shown to inhibit vascular
`tested whether paclitaxelcoated coronary stents are effective at preventing neointimal proliferation in a porcine model
`of restenosis
`
`Methods and ResultsPalmazSchatz stents were dip coated with paclitaxel 0 02 15 or 187 pgstent by immersion
`in ethanolic paclitaxel and evaporation of the solvent Stents were deployed with mild oversizing in the left anterior
`descending coronary artery LAD of 41 minipigs The treatment effect was assessed 4 weeks after stent
`implantation
`late loss index mean luminal diameter decreased with increasing paclitaxel dose P<00028 by
`The angiographic
`ANOVA declining by 843 from 0352 to 0055 P<005 at the highest
`tested 187 pgstent versus control
`the neointimal area decreased by 395 high dose versus control P<005 with
`Accompanying this change
`dose P<0040 by ANOVA whereas the luminal area increased by 904 high dose versus control
`P<005 with escalating dose P<00004 by ANOVA Inflammatory cells were seen infrequently and there were no
`cases of aneurysm or thrombosis
`ConclusionsPaclitaxelcoated
`inhibition of neointimal hyperpla
`coronary stents produced a significant dose dependent
`in the pig LAD 28 days after implantation later effects require further study These results
`sia and luminal encroachment
`therapeutic benefit of paclitaxelcoated coronary stents in the prevention and treatment of
`demonstrate the potential
`human coronary restenosis Circulation 200110322892295
`
`increasing
`
`level
`
`Key Words paclitaxel
`
`stents
`
`angioplasty
`
`restenosis
`
`remains a frequent cause of late failure after
`Restenosis
`successful coronary angioplasty Coronary
`initially
`stents reduce restenosis by limiting the extent of elastic recoil
`and late vascular remodeling2 Despite these improvements
`the incidence of restenosis remains high because of neointi
`mal hyperplasia which is induced by all
`forms of dilating
`mechanical
`injury and is aggravated
`by the presence of the
`stent instent restenosis 3 Combining the mechanical sup
`to limit neointimal
`port of a stent with a treatment
`ingrowth
`improve therapeutic outcomes This combined
`should further
`has been used successfully in intracoronary brachy
`approach
`therapy43 Late thrombosis and edge stenosis
`the candy
`wrapper effect
`that may limit
`are potential complications
`the effectiveness of this approach36
`
`antineoplastic
`
`inhibitors of neointimal hyperplasia like
`Pharmacological
`represent an alternative to radiation therapy78
`paclitaxel
`Paclitaxel Taxol is a derivatized diterpenoid that exerts an
`effect by interfering with cell microtubule
`function910 Paclitaxel alters the dynamic equilibrium be
`and a and 13tubulin by favoring the
`tween microtubules
`formation of abnormally stable microtubules11 This leads to
`the inhibition of cell division and migration intracellular
`signaling and protein secretion which all
`rely on the rapid
`and efficient
`of microtubules Systemic
`depolymerization
`in the rat showed that a significant
`application of paclitaxel
`70 reduction in neointimal proliferation could be achieved
`
`than antineoplastic
`at blood concentrations 100 times lower
`In rat7 and humans cultured cell models paclitaxel
`
`levels 7
`
`oHdtiqtuoijpaproiumoa
`
`ahajournalsorg
`
`by
`
`guest
`
`on
`
`April
`
`20
`
`2017
`
`Received September 28 2000 revision received December
`
`Medicine and the National
`
`15 2000 accepted December
`
`19 2000
`
`From the Division of Cardiology AWH GMJ BSA KEB JAB and Department of Pathology RHH BR Johns Hopkins School of
`Institute on Aging National Institutes of Health LC PFH DWK MW CN JLK SJS EGL JPF Baltimore
`Md and Angiotech Pharmaceuticals Inc Vancouver BC Canada WLH
`
`Presented in part at the 70th Scientific Sessions of the American Heart Association Orlando Fla November 1013 1997 and published in abstract
`I11288
`form Circulation 199796suppl
`to Alan W Heldman MD Division of Cardiology Carnegie 565 Johns Hopkins Hospital
`Correspondence
`Email aheldmanjhmiedu
`© 2001 American Heart Association Inc
`
`600 N Wolfe St Baltimore MD 21287
`
`Circulation is available at httpwwwcirculationahaorg
`
`2289
`
`Abraxis EX2035
`Actavis LLC v Abraxis Bioscience LLC
`1PR201701101 1PR201701103 1PR201701104
`
`

`

`2290
`
`Circulation
`
`May 8 2001
`
`prevented growth factorstimulated vascular smooth muscle
`cell migration and proliferation consistent with its effects on
`formation in vivo As an alternative to systemic
`neointimal
`therapy local drug delivery offers the advantages of allowing
`high local concentrations of drug at the treatment site while
`local de
`minimizing systemic toxic effects For paclitaxel
`livery might be achieved by a drug delivery catheters or by a
`coated stent12
`
`to the arterial wall can
`
`The sustained delivery of paclitaxel
`be achieved with polymeric stent coatings but these coatings
`inflammation and thrombosis12 After an initial
`may induce
`stents we resorted to
`failed attempt with polymercoated
`stents with paclitaxel dissolved in a
`dip coating metallic
`volatile solvent ethanol Evaporation of the solvent
`that adheres
`to the surface of the
`fine residue of paclitaxel
`stent By limitation of the coating to paclitaxel
`associated with certain polymers were
`able complications
`avoided The dip coating technique also allows paclitaxel
`have
`immediate contact with the vessel wall
`
`leaves a
`
`the undesir
`
`to
`
`favoring its
`tissue This strategy for local
`rapid accumulation by arterial
`drug delivery resembles shortterm irradiation4 by optimizing
`the conditions for blocking the earliest cellular events
`
`trig
`
`gered by injury1314
`
`Methods
`
`Stent Preparation
`Johnson were coated by dipping
`PalmazSchatz
`stents Johnson
`and evaporating the solvent This
`the stent into ethanolic paclitaxel
`procedure left a fine residue of paclitaxel covering the surface of the
`stent Results of local extravascular paclitaxel delivery studies in the
`rat 10 ttg paclitaxel effectively inhibited neointimal growth unpub
`lished results were used to establish 4 treatment groups control 0
`low dose 02 ttgstent
`intermediate dose 15 ttgstent
`ttgstent
`and high dose 187 ttgstent Coated stents were checked
`for the
`uniformity of drug application by selecting several stents at random
`and measuring pacli
`from each batch extracting them in ethanol
`liquid chromatography HPLC Gilson
`taxel by highperformance
`Paclitaxel was eluted from a 25cmX46mm pentafluorophenyl
`consisting of 45
`column ES Industries in a mobile
`acetonitrile and 55 water flowing at 15 mLmin and monitored at
`227 nm with a UV detector Gilson model 116 Paclitaxelcoated
`stents were mounted on 30 mm balloons PS1530 balloon delivery
`catheter Johnson
`Johnson with a manufacturer supplied crimp
`ing tool Sterilization was carried out with ethylene oxide gas Drug
`losses associated with the mounting and crimping procedure were
`evaluated by extracting the demounted stents in ethanol and subject
`to HPLC Loss of paclitaxel
`to the blood was
`ing the extract
`at 37°C in pig
`determined
`stents
`by incubating
`paclitaxelcoated
`whole blood treated with 1 mmolL EDTA to prevent clotting The
`incubation time was varied to establish a paclitaxel washout curve
`
`phase
`
`Stent Deployment
`care and
`All animal protocols were approved by the animal
`use
`Institute on Aging NIH and Johns
`committees of the National
`Hopkins University and were conducted according to established
`guidelines for the humane use and treatment of laboratory animals
`Male and female NIH minipigs n=43 weighing 35 to 45 kg were
`pretreated with aspirin 325 mg and diltiazem Cardizem CD 180
`mg the day before stent implantation Aspirin 325 mg was given
`the evaluation period The animals were sedated
`with ketamine 20 mgkg IM and acetylpromazine 022 mgkg IM
`and given sodium pentobarbital 4 mgkg IV to facilitate
`supine
`positioning and endotracheal
`with 1 to 2 isoflurane in oxygen flowing at 2 Lmin An 8F
`intubation Anesthesia was maintained
`
`daily throughout
`
`arterial sheath was inserted into the right carotid artery under sterile
`
`technique and heparin 5000 U was administered
`surgical
`intraarterial bolus The
`stent was delivered to the left anterior
`descending coronary artery LAD through an 8F Judkins
`right
`guiding catheter and deployed by two 30 second balloon inflations at
`8 atm The segment of artery to be stented was selected
`to allow
`12 times oversizing by visual estimation Angulated and branch
`ing segments were stented
`this degree of
`to permit
`if necessary
`implantation was done by a single pair of operators
`oversizing Stent
`
`as an
`
`AWH and MW who were blinded to the treatment groups
`
`Coronary angiography was performed in 2 views generally antero
`posterior and 30° left anterior oblique immediately before and after
`
`stent
`
`implantation
`
`Angiographic Analysis
`Angiograms were performed during the initial catheterization and at
`4week followup The angiographic mean luminal diameter MLD
`within the stented segment was measured by computerized coronary
`angiography ImageComm by 2 blinded investigators AWH and
`BSA Two views were measured and averaged
`for each arterial
`segment Neointimal encroachment of the lumen was evaluated from
`the late loss index LLI defined as LLI=MLD0MLD4wksMLD0
`where MLD and MED4wks are the MLDs immediately after stenting
`and at followup respectively
`
`overnight
`
`Histological Preparation and
`Histomorphometric Analysis
`After the terminal angiogram the heart was excised and perfusion
`fixed with 10 formalin at 100 mm Hg for 15 minutes After
`immersionfixation a segment of the LAD containing the
`stent was dissected from the myocardium The LAD segment was
`embedded in acrylic plastic and cut
`into 3 blocks containing the
`proximal middle and distal portions of
`the
`stent Three cross
`from each of these blocks with a tungsten carbide
`sections were cut
`knife and stained with elastic van Gieson or Movat pentachrome
`and distal
`tissue from adjacent proximal
`Arterial
`nonstented
`segments of the LAD were paraffin embedded
`and stained with the
`above dyes or hematoxylin and eosin Histomorphometric
`analysis of
`the tissue sections was performed by computerized video imaging
`with an Axioplan microscope Zeiss and a black and white MTI
`video camera DageMTI
`Inc Video images were analyzed with
`IBAS 20 software IBAS Kontron Electronik
`The vessel
`injury
`score was determined by the method of Schwartz et a115 The luminal
`and neointimal
`areas were evaluated for each of the tissue cross
`averaged and expressed as the absolute area
`in square
`sections
`millimeters The neointimal
`and medial wall
`thicknesses in milli
`meters were measured halfway between each pair of strut openings
`tissue cross sections
`and averaged
`inbetween distance
`over all
`thickness was also measured at each strut site strut
`Neointimal
`lumen distance All morphometric analyses were made by investi
`gators LC and CN blinded to the treatment groups
`
`at
`
`Determination of Postdeployment Paclitaxel Levels
`the intermediate 16 ttgstent
`PalmazSchatz
`stents dip coated
`doses were deployed in the LAD
`and high 177 ttgstent paclitaxel
`and left
`in place for 10 to 15 minutes The heart was removed and
`perfused with 10 formalin before dissection of the stented arterial
`segment to preserve the tissue architecture and minimize drug losses
`segment of LAD were each
`The excised stent and surrounding
`extracted with 1 mL of absolute ethanol
`for 72 hours at
`room
`ethanol extracts was determined
`Paclitaxel
`in the
`by HPLC
`
`temperature
`
`quantitatively
`
`Statistical Analysis
`data were analyzed by comparing
`and histological
`Angiographic
`stents by use of a 1 way ANOVA
`and paclitaxelcoated
`control
`Pairwise comparisons involving the control and different
`test which
`groups were performed according to the post hoc Dunnett
`The
`level of significance was
`corrects for multiple comparisons
`taken as P<005 Results are reported as mean±SEM
`
`treatment
`
`paproiumoa
`
`pHdmw
`
`ag
`
`ahajournalsorg
`
`by
`
`guest
`
`on
`
`April
`
`20
`
`2017
`
`

`

`Heldman et al
`
`Paclitaxel
`
`Inhibits Neointimal Hyperplasia
`
`2291
`
`A o
`
`4$ 03
`
`02
`
`01
`
`00
`
`n=11
`
`n= 8
`
`n=11
`
`n=5
`
`0
`
`02
`
`15
`
`187
`
`Paclitaxel pgstent
`
`n= 5
`
`n=11
`
`TABLE 1 Stent Oversize Ratio Vascular
`Stent Circumference
`
`Injury Score and
`
`Oversize Ratio
`
`Injury Score
`
`Stent
`
`Circumference mm
`
`128±003
`
`123±002
`
`124±002
`
`129±007
`
`107±009
`
`27±021
`
`28±013
`
`11±023
`
`769±016
`
`769± 026
`
`772± 048
`
`745±011
`
`Paclitaxel
`
`AgStent
`
`0 0
`
`2
`
`15
`
`187
`
`Oversize ratio indicates MLD
`
`after
`
`stentingMLD
`
`before stenting stent
`
`the linear distance from
`circumference
`of the stent Results are reported as m
`
`strut to strut around the circumference
`
`25
`
`ean±SEM
`
`20 I
`
`n=11
`
`n=8
`
`15
`
`10
`
`05
`
`00
`
`To
`
`5 E
`
`c
`nz
`
`0
`
`02
`
`15
`
`187
`
`Paclitaxel Astent
`
`Figure 2 A LLI vs paclitaxel dose B MLD at 4week followup
`vs paclitaxel dose Results are reported as mean±SEM
`P<005 vs control Dunnetts test
`
`dilatations were found in any of the treatment groups Angio
`gams were evaluated for the MLD and LLI during the 4 week
`period Figure 2 Application of ANOVA to the LLI data
`between the treatment groups was
`revealed that the difference
`significant P<00028 The LLI was dose dependent between
`from 0352 to
`the control and high paclitaxel doses the LLI fell
`0055 declining by 84 P<005 by Dunnetts
`test The
`change in MLD with increasing drug dose was inversely related
`in LLI The gain in MLD rose to 146 of the
`control group at the high paclitaxel dose P<005 by Dunnetts
`test and was highly significant across all group comparisons
`P<00012 by ANOVA
`
`to the decline
`
`Histomorphometric Analysis
`
`Representative
`
`from the different
`arterial cross sections
`ment groups are shown in Figure 3 In the control Figure 3A
`and low dose Figure 3B groups the stent strut sites were
`clearly visible between the neointima and internal elastic lamina
`causing mild compression of the medial wall A progressive
`formation was observed with
`decline in the extent of neointimal
`
`treat
`
`Results
`
`dial
`
`infarction
`
`in the LAD with
`Fortythree pigs underwent stent placement
`paclitaxelcoated PalmazSchatz
`stents All pigs survived to
`completion of the 4 week study without evidence of myocar
`on gross inspection Fortyone pigs in 4
`11 in the control 0 ptg
`treatment groups were analyzed
`the low dose 02 ptgstent
`15 at the intermediate
`stent 8 at
`dose 15 ptgstent
`the high dose 187 ptgstent
`and 7 at
`Because efficacy was judged by the ability to inhibit neoin
`timal hyperplasia induced by injury animals with low injury
`scores and incomplete engagement of the stent struts were
`eliminated from further analysis This occurred in 2 pigs in
`the control group with injury scores of 017 and 021 the
`mean injury score
`remaining 41 animals was
`119±008 mean± SEM Uniformity of the applied injury
`was evident from the similarity in oversize ratios 126 ± 002
`P<0231 by ANOVA and
`injury scores P<0755 by
`ANOVA which were not significantly different
`in the 4
`treatment groups Table 1
`
`for
`
`the
`
`Angiographic Analysis
`The 4 week followup angiogams Figure 1 showed a graded
`effect of paclitaxel dose with the largest reduction in neointimal
`
`at
`
`the high dose In the control angiogam a
`encroachment
`distinctive narrowing of the stented LAD segment was evident
`that was less severe at
`the intermediate dose At the high dose
`between
`a stepdown in the luminal diameter occurred
`stented and nonstented
`segments indicating effective
`of neointimal growth andor mild arterial dilatation in the
`drug applied region No hyperplastic edge effects or aneurysmal
`
`the
`
`inhibition
`
`paproiumoa
`
`pHdmw
`
`ag
`
`ahajournalsorg
`
`by
`
`guest
`
`on
`
`April
`
`20
`
`2017
`
`Figure 1 Four week followup angiograms of stented LADs A No paclitaxel control B intermediate dose paclitaxel 15 Agstent
`and C high dose paclitaxel 187 Agstent Arrows show approximate midpoint of stent
`
`

`

`of stented
`
`Figure 3 Photomicrographs
`LAD cross sections magnification x40
`A No paclitaxel control B low dose
`paclitaxel 02 Agstent C intermediate
`dose paclitaxel 15 Agstent and D
`high dose paclitaxel 187 Agstent
`lumen in A
`Black material partially filling
`is barium gelatin dye contrast medium
`indicate bound
`Solid and open arrows
`aries formed by internal and external
`elastic laminae respectively L indicates
`lumen N neointima M tunica media
`and A tunica adventitia
`
`and medial wall hemorrhage The frequency of these changes
`increased with the applied drug dose implicating paclitaxel
`in
`
`their origin Infiltration of cells with inflammatory morphology
`was seen infrequently in the cross sections and was not corre
`lated with the paclitaxel dose A small number of sections
`showed a perivascular inflammation that was probably injury
`related The identification of endothelial cells was limited by the
`technique however endothelium like cells
`tissue processing
`were occasionally seen surrounding the lumen forming an
`incomplete barrier in all of the treatment groups
`Figure 4A shows the dose dependence of the neointimal area
`calibrated to the drug dose applied to the stent Consistent with
`the relationship found in the LLI the high dose treatment group
`formation com
`showed
`reduction of neointimal
`a significant
`pared with controls 39 P<005 by Dunnetts
`test
`the
`significance with all group comparisons included was P<00402
`by ANOVA A similar dose dependence
`was observed
`in the
`index Figure 4C Neointimal
`neointimal
`thickness
`thickness
`declined significantly between the control and high dose groups
`55 inbetween and 75 strut lumen P<005 by Dunnetts
`test and was significant over all groups P<00058 inbetween
`strutlumen by ANOVA As shown in Figure
`and P<00001
`4D medial wall thickness was also reduced by 26 at the high
`drug dose compared with the control group P<005 by Dun
`thickness was not
`netts test The decrease in medial wall
`significant by ANOVA P<009 however suggesting that
`than those
`medial wall cells may be less sensitive to paclitaxel
`found in the neointima
`
`the
`
`The change in luminal area with increasing drug dose was
`inversely related to the decline in the LLI and neointimal area
`Figure 4B The luminal area at the high dose was 190 of
`that for the control group P<005 by Dunnetts test and the
`difference in luminal area was highly significant
`group comparisons P<00004 by ANOVA An uninten
`stent was
`ruled out on the
`tional bias in oversizing the
`the mean stent circumference
`determined by
`grounds that
`summation of the strut to strut distances was not signifi
`in the 4 treatment groups Table 1
`
`cantly different
`
`across all
`
`2292
`
`Circulation
`
`May 8 2001
`
`increasing drug dose This inhibition was particularly evident at
`the high dose Figure 3D where the strut sites protruded into
`the lumen attached to the vessel wall by a narrow pedestal of
`acellular material Expansion of the stent would have initially
`forced the struts into the medial wall
`
`like the control group
`these changes involved expansion of the vessel
`suggesting that
`wall ectasia or dilatation Incomplete deployment of the stent
`as the cause of this effect was ruled out by the similarity in
`Table 1
`oversize ratios injury scores and stent circumferences
`Illumination of the acellular material with polarized light re
`it was noncrystalline which excluded paclitaxel or a
`vealed that
`metabolite as its probable source Similar less intensely stained
`deposits were seen surrounding the strut sites at the lower doses
`Figure 3C but were completely absent from the control group
`Other histological changes Table 2 included medial wall cell
`necrosis with associated calcified deposits and focal neointimal
`
`TABLE 2
`
`Paclitaxel Histopathology
`
`Tissue Event
`
`0
`
`02
`
`15
`
`187
`
`Paclitaxel Dose µgStent
`
`Focal
`
`hemorrhage
`
`Neointima
`
`Medial wall
`
`Tissue necrosis
`
`Amorphous deposits
`
`Neointima
`
`Medial wall
`
`Inflammation
`
`Thrombosis
`
`<1
`
`ND
`
`ND
`
`ND
`
`ND
`
`03
`
`ND
`
`9
`
`ND
`
`ND
`
`18
`
`6
`
`2
`
`<1
`
`31
`
`ND
`
`07
`
`ND
`
`6
`
`30
`
`ND
`
`25
`
`28
`
`13
`
`68
`
`53
`
`ND
`
`ND
`
`The arterial cross section was divided into N pie shaped sectors where N is
`
`the total number of stent struts The frequency of a histopathological event was
`nx100N where n is the number of sectors in which the event appeared For
`each pig an average score was computed from the proximal middle and distal
`arterial cross sections Data acquired from all pigs were used to compute the
`average score at a given dose ND indicates not detectable
`The presence of
`inflammation was detected as anything more than a very mild noncircumfer
`infiltrate around the strut21
`
`ential
`
`paproiumoa
`
`pHdmw
`
`ag
`
`ahajournalsorg
`
`by
`
`guest
`
`on
`
`April
`
`20
`
`2017
`
`

`

`Heldman et al
`
`Paclitaxel
`
`Inhibits Neointimal Hyperplasia
`
`2293
`
`results suggest
`
`that a significant
`
`associated with the tissue At
`the drug was
`recovered
`recovery was larger
`than observed at
`
`of
`
`the intermediate dose only
`and
`the variation in
`the high dose These
`loss of the applied paclitaxel
`occurred before it
`reached the tissue
`In a separate set of in vitro experiments drug retention on
`only 52 of the
`the stent after balloon mounting averaged
`applied dose 197 ptgstent
`losses up to
`and additional
`17 occurred during ex vivo manipulation
`subsequent
`to
`mounting These losses may have resulted from cracking and
`flaking of the paclitaxel
`film caused by distortion of the stent
`during crimping Simple handling of the stent before mount
`ing resulted in <5 drug loss Additional
`losses to the blood
`lipids may occur during the brief 30second exposure to
`the coronary circulation before deployment This was dem
`in which a 30 second
`onstrated in washout experiments
`exposure to pig blood at 37°C resulted in loss of <5 of the
`applied paclitaxel dose
`
`Discussion
`In this study a pig model of coronary stent
`restenosis was
`local paclitaxel delivery would prevent
`used to test whether
`neointimal hyperplasia induced by vascular stretch injury
`PalmazSchatz
`stents were coated with a range of paclitaxel
`doses and were deployed with mild oversizing in the LAD
`Preliminary experiments that applied paclitaxel by use of a
`
`n=7
`
`II
`
`187
`
`n=7
`
`n= 11
`
`n= 8
`
`n= 15
`
`20
`
`15
`
`10
`
`05
`
`A E
`
`1 00
`
`0
`
`02
`15
`Paclitaxel µgstent
`
`30
`
`20 I
`
`ii
`
`n=8
`
`n=15
`
`0
`
`02
`15
`Paclitaxel µgstent
`
`187
`
`n= 11
`
`n= 8
`
`In Between
`CI StrutLumen
`
`n=15
`
`n= 7
`
`0
`
`02
`
`15
`
`187
`
`To
`
`s
`
`1 o
`
`00
`
`04
`
`03
`
`02
`
`01
`
`00
`
`0
`
`mm
`
`NeointimalThickness
`
`paproiumoa
`
`pHdmw
`
`ag
`
`nonbiodegradable
`ethylene
`vinyl acetate polymeric stent
`coating were marked by an intense inflammatory response
`severe luminal narrowing thrombosis and death To reduce
`these risks we chose to eliminate the polymer and apply
`to the bare stent with a dip coating technique see
`Methods We assumed that
`this approach would be optimal
`for rapid drug elution and high drug tissue concentrations
`because there is no barrier to prevent paclitaxel
`from gaining
`immediate access to the injured arterial
`in
`Locally applied paclitaxel produced a dose dependent
`hibition of neointimal
`formation as revealed by the pattern of
`in the angiographic and histomorphometric
`change
`during the 4 week evaluation period Analysis of the data by
`ANOVA showed that
`inhibition of the tissue hyperplastic
`response was significant neointimal area P<0040 LLI
`P<00028 or highly significant
`luminal area P<00004
`over all
`treatment groups In pairwise comparisons involving
`Dunnetts test statistical significance was routinely observed
`when the high dose treatment group was compared with the
`controls Specifically the LLI Figure 2A and luminal area
`Figure 4B showed the largest differences 84 for LLI
`90 for luminal area whereas the percentage
`MLD 46 and neointimal
`area 39 were less pro
`
`tissue
`
`indices
`
`change in the
`
`paclitaxel
`
`Paclitaxel vigistent
`
`n= 11
`
`n= 8
`
`n=15n= 7
`
`T
`
`015
`
`010
`
`I
`
`005
`
`2 000
`
`0
`
`02
`
`15
`
`187
`
`Paclitaxel µgstent
`
`thickness
`
`of A neointimal area B lumina
`Figure 4 Dose dependence
`area C neointimal
`and D medial wall
`thickness Neo
`intimal thickness in mm was measured as linear distance from
`lumen to 1 stent strut site strut lumen or 2 a point halfway
`between each pair of stent strut sites inbetween Results are
`reported as mean±SEM P<005 vs control Dunnetts test
`
`taxel
`
`Postdeployment Paclitaxel Levels
`Shortterm studies to determine the postdeployment pacli
`levels Table 3 showed that at the high paclitaxel dose
`of the drug originally deposited on the stent was
`recovered Of this slightly less than 50 of the dose was
`
`ahajournalsorg
`
`by
`
`guest
`
`on
`
`April
`
`20
`
`2017
`
`Postimplantation Paclitaxel Recovery
`
`Instrument
`
`Recovery
`
`n
`
`6
`
`4
`
`Stent Ag
`
`Tissue Ag
`
`P9
`
`Total Ag
`
`336±175
`594
`6368±845
`530
`
`228±139
`402
`5543±1392
`462
`
`002 ± 0005
`
`03
`
`093±0860
`
`08
`
`565±217
`100
`12002±1503
`100
`
`338
`
`678
`
`TABLE 3
`
`Applied Dose
`
`n 1
`
`67±16
`
`177±85
`
`Paclitaxel
`
`removed from dissecting instruments
`
`

`

`2294
`
`Circulation
`
`May 8 2001
`
`in
`
`nounced Although the effects of paclitaxel on each of the
`consistent eg the changes
`indices were qualitatively
`in
`neointimal and luminal area were inversely related inhibi
`the high dose 078 mm2 versus
`tion of neointimal growth at
`control alone could not account
`for the increase in luminal
`area 135 mm2 versus control Exposure to the high dose of
`paclitaxel eliminated direct contact between the strut sites and
`medial wall Figure 3D implying that
`the vessel wall had
`undergone dilatation relative to the stent This was consistent
`records which showed a stepdown
`with angiographic
`luminal diameter between the drug applied stented and
`nonstented regions Figure 1C From the discrepancy be
`tween the neointimal and luminal area changes wall dilata
`for as much as 42 of the luminal increase at
`tion accounted
`the high paclitaxel dose and 36 at
`the intermediate dose
`can be traced to a
`the gain in luminal diameter
`thickness Figure 4D which was
`reduction in medial wall
`significant only at the high paclitaxel dose This suggests that
`in addition to neointimal growth inhibition and arterial wall
`dilatation16 a third component of the mechanism of action of
`involves the loss of vascular smooth muscle cells
`
`Part of
`
`paclitaxel
`from a quiescent nondividing population in the medial wall
`This effect probably represents true necrosis of the medial
`wall with perhaps a smaller contribution from apoptosis
`The cytostatic effects of paclitaxel on neointimal
`formation
`were complicated by local cytotoxic effects that manifested
`as a decrease in medial wall thickness focal neointimal and
`
`cells were an infrequent
`
`cellular
`
`during the
`
`require subsequent
`
`medial wall hemorrhage
`and cell necrosis
`Inflammatory
`finding at all paclitaxel doses Table
`2 arguing against the drug eluting coating as a stimulus to
`inflammation At the high dose of paclitaxel a reduction in
`cell numbers andor extracellular protein mass may have been
`responsible for the decline in medial wall thickness Various
`repair mechanisms
`responding to arterial dilatation
`and
`these
`changing wall
`tension may compensate for
`changes The acellular material eg fibrin bridging the gap
`between the medial wall and strut sites Figure 3D may be a
`repair mechanisms acting to stabi
`manifestation of cellular
`lize the arterial wall against further dilatation Although none
`of
`the pigs died from vascular complications
`4 week period concern
`about possible evolving complica
`long
`tions aneurysm wall rupture will
`to evaluate
`term experiments
`safety of this treatment
`the
`strategy Longterm studies should reveal whether cellular
`repair mechanisms respond to injury and cytotoxicity
`by
`this might reduce the longterm therapeu
`overcompensation
`tic benefit of paclitaxel particularly at the high dose at which
`medial wall necrosis and neointimal
`inhibition were signifi
`cant The requirement
`for longterm followup is underscored
`by the disparity between 1 month data1718
`and longterm
`results619 obtained with intracoronary brachytherapy which
`increase in neointi
`is complicated by a late dose dependent
`mal
`formation
`and delayed healing of
`
`the endothelium
`
`Further study will determine whether local paclitaxel delivery
`a sustained benefit or whether complications similar
`produces
`to those associated with brachytherapy diminish its therapeu
`
`tic potential
`
`An important property of paclitaxel
`is its insolubility in
`water which minimizes loss to the blood during catheteriza
`
`tion <5 during a 30 second exposure and facilitates tissue
`
`after contact with the arterial wall The lipophilic
`
`it
`
`uptake
`nature of paclitaxel may enhance cellular uptake by enabling
`to pass through the hydrophobic barrier of cell mem
`branes2021 A significant
`fraction may also be retained by
`membrane lipids and remain there as a depot for continuous
`release In diseased human vessels variations in the lipid
`content of plaque may alter the drug distribution pattern and
`from the standpoint of
`reduce its efficacy Another concern
`tissue levels of paclitaxel
`therapeutics is whether adequate
`
`a resurgence of neointimal
`can be maintained to prevent
`longer periods of time The compound coating
`growth over
`material used in some sustained release devices
`can extend
`the period of paclitaxel availability weeks months and
`maintain inhibitory control
`of paclitaxel
`in the presence
`washout andor metabolism It can also protect against drug
`losses from the stent during the procedures leading up to and
`including implantation mounting crimping handling Tests
`with our dip coated stents showed that most of the drug loss
`occurred before stent expansion and deployment arguing for
`modification of
`This might be
`coating
`procedure
`the
`
`in a fast release polymer
`achieved by encapsulating paclitaxel
`to the stent after mounting Al
`or by applying paclitaxel
`stent used
`in this study may have
`though the dip coated
`for efficacy barrierfree drug elution and safety
`
`advantages
`
`biocompatibility it
`
`should not be regarded as a final
`
`preclinical design
`
`Research
`
`Acknowledgments
`Inc
`funding was provided by Angiotech Pharmaceuticals
`and Develop
`Vancouver Canada through a Cooperative Research
`ment Award CRADA with the National
`Institutes of Health and
`Johns Hopkins University The authors express their appreciation to
`Frances OConnor
`for help in performing the statistical analysis
`
`References
`
`1 Popma JJ CaliffRIVl Topol EJ Clinical trials of restenosis after coronary
`angioplasty Circulation 19918414261436
`2 Serruys PW de Jaegere P Kiemeneij F et al A comparison of balloon
`in patients with
`implantation with balloon angioplasty
`expandable stent
`coronary artery disease N Engl J Med 1994331489495
`3 Edelman ER Rogers C Hoop dreams stents without restenosis Circu
`lation 19969411991202
`4 Teirstein PS Massullo V Jani S et al Threeyear clinical and angio
`radiation results of a randomized
`graphic followup after
`intracoronary
`clinical trial Circulation 2000101360365
`
`5 Albiero R Adamian M Kobayashi N et al Short and intermediate term
`
`results of 32P radioactive
`
`I3 emitting stent
`
`implantation
`
`in patients with
`
`artery disease
`coronary
`20001011826
`6 Costa MA Sabate M van der Giessen WJ et al Late coronary occlusion
`
`the Milan dose response
`
`study Circulation
`
`brachytherapy Circulation 1999100789792
`after intracoronary
`7 Sollott SJ Cheng L Pauly RR et al Taxol
`inhibits neointimal smooth
`muscle cell accumulation
`after angioplasty
`
`J Clin Invest
`
`in the rat
`
`19959518691876
`
`smooth muscle cell
`
`inhibits arterial
`
`8 Axel DI Kunert W Goggelmann C et al Paclitaxel
`proliferation and migration in vitro and in vivo using
`local drug delivery Circulation 199796636645
`9 Wani MC Taylor HL Wall ME et al Plant antitumor
`agents VI the
`and antitumor
`isolation and structure of taxol a novel antileukemic
`agent
`from Taxus brevifolia J Am Chem Sac 19719323252327
`10 Rowinsky EK Donehower RC Paclitaxel Taxol N Engl J Med 1995
`33210041014
`11 Schiff PB Horwitz SB Taxol stabilizes microtubules
`cells Proc Natl Acad i U SA 19807715611565
`
`in mouse fibroblast
`
`paproiumoa
`
`pHdmw
`
`ag
`
`ahajournalsorg
`
`by
`
`guest
`
`on
`
`April
`
`20
`
`2017
`
`

`

`Heldman et al
`
`Paclitaxel
`
`Inhibits Neointimal Hyperplasia
`
`2295
`
`polymers
`
`after arterial
`
`12 van der Giessen WJ Lincoff AM Schwartz RS et al Marked
`of biodegradable
`and nonbiodegradable
`matory sequelae to implantation
`in porcine coronary arteries Circulation 19969416901697
`13 Clowes AW Reidy MA Clowes MM Kinetics of cellular proliferation
`injury I smooth muscle growth in the absence of endothe
`IMm Lab Invest 198349327333
`14 Brieger D Topol E Local drug delivery systems and prevention
`restenosis Cardiovasc Res 199735405 413
`15 Schwartz RS Huber KC Murphy JG et al Restenosis and the propor
`tional neointimal response to coronary artery injury results in a porcine
`model J A

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket