throbber
2592
`
`Intraarterial Chemotherapy with Polyoxyethylated
`Castor Oil Free Paclitaxel, Incorporated in Albumin
`Nanoparticles (ABI-007)
`PhaseIStudyofPatientswithSquamousCellCarcinomaoftheHeadandNeckand
`AnalCanal:PreliminaryEvidenceofClinicalActivity
`
`Bruno Damascelli, M.D.1
`Giulio Cantu` , M.D.2
`Franco Mattavelli, M.D.2
`Paolo Tamplenizza, M.D.3
`Paolo Bidoli, M.D.4
`Ermanno Leo, M.D.5
`Franco Dosio, M.D.6
`Anna M. Cerrotta, M.D.7
`Giuseppe Di Tolla, M.D.1
`Laura F. Frigerio, M.D.1
`Francesco Garbagnati, M.D.1
`Rodolfo Lanocita, M.D.1
`Alfonso Marchiano` , M.D.1
`Gianluigi Patelli, M.D.1
`Carlo Spreafico, M.D.1
`Vladimira Ticha` , M.D.1
`Valentina Vespro, M.D.1
`Franco Zunino, M.D.8
`
`1 Department of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tu-
`mori, Milano, Italy.
`
`2 Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Istituto
`Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy.
`
`3 Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Univer-
`sita` degli studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.
`
`4 Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Nazio-
`nale Tumori, Milano, Italy.
`
`5 Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Istituto
`Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy.
`
`6 Department of Chemical, Food, Pharmaceutical
`and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Pi-
`emonte East, Novara, Italy.
`
`7 Department of Radiotherapy,
`Tumori, Milano, Italy.
`
`Istituto Nazionale
`
`8 Department of Experimental Oncology,
`Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy.
`
`Istituto
`
`© 2001 American Cancer Society
`
`BACKGROUND. This study was designed to determine the feasibility, maximum
`tolerated dose, and toxicities of intraarterial administration of paclitaxel-albumin
`nanoparticles in patients with advanced head and neck and recurrent anal canal
`squamous cell carcinoma. Antitumor activity also was assessed.
`METHODS. Forty-three patients (31 with advanced head and neck and 12 with
`recurrent anal canal squamous cell carcinoma) were treated intraarterially with
`ABI-007 every 4 weeks for 3 cycles. In total, 120 treatment cycles were completed,
`86 in patients with head and neck carcinoma (median, 3 cycles; range, 1– 4) and 34
`in patients with anal canal carcinoma (median, 3 cycles; range, 1– 4). ABI-007 was
`compared preliminarily with Taxolt for in vitro cytostatic activity. Increasing dose
`levels from 120 to 300 mg/m2 were studied in 18 patients. Pharmacokinetic profiles
`after intraarterial administration were obtained in a restricted number of patients.
`RESULTS. The dose-limiting toxicity of ABI-007 was myelosuppression consisting of
`Grade 4 neutropenia in 3 patients. Nonhematologic toxicities included total alo-
`pecia (30 patients), gastrointestinal toxicity (3 patients, Grade 2), skin toxicity (5
`patients, Grade 2), neurologic toxicity (4 patients, Grade 2) ocular toxicity (1
`patient, Grade 2), flu-like syndrome (7 patients, Grade 2; 1 patient, Grade 3). In
`total, 120 transfemoral, percutaneous catheterization procedure–related compli-
`cations occurred only during catheterization of the neck vessels in 3 patients (2
`TIA, 1 hemiparesis) and resolved spontaneously.
`CONCLUSIONS. Intraarterial administration of ABI-007 by percutaneous catheter-
`ization does not require premedication, is easy and reproducible, and has accept-
`able toxicity. The maximum tolerated dose in a single administration was 270
`mg/m2. Most dose levels showed considerable antitumor activity (42 assessable
`patients with 80.9% complete response and partial response). The recommended
`Phase II dose is 230 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Cancer 2001;92:2592– 602.
`© 2001 American Cancer Society.
`
`KEYWORDS: taxanes, paclitaxel, intraarterial chemotherapy, squamous cell carcinoma.
`
`Supported in part by ACS Dobfar, Milano, Italy, as
`licensee for ABI-007 and in part by a grant from
`Lega Italiana per la Lotta contro i Tumori, Milano.
`
`The authors are indebted to Marco Falciani, Patrick
`Soon Shiong, and Neil Desai, without whose sup-
`port this study would not have been possible, and
`to Flora Stivan, Mary Trotter, and Sauro Ceccarini
`for assistance in preparation of the article.
`
`Address for reprints: Bruno Damascelli, M.D., De-
`partment of Radiology,
`Istituto Nazionale per lo
`Studio e la Cura dei Tumori di Milano, Via Ven-
`ezian, 1, 20133 Milano,
`Italy; Fax: 390-2239-
`0398;
`E-mail: damascelli@istitutotumori.mi.it
`
`Received February 5, 2001; accepted July 16,
`2001. Precis
`
`Actavis - IPR2017-01101, Ex. 1017, p. 1 of 11
`
`

`

`Intraarterial Polyoxyethylated Castor Oil Free Paclitaxel/Damascelli et al.
`
`2593
`
`Paclitaxel was the first taxane to be introduced into
`
`clinical practice, but because of its poor solubility
`in water it must be formulated with polyoxyethylated
`castor oil and ethanol (Taxolt). Polyoxyethylated cas-
`tor oil can cause allergic reactions; therefore, patients
`must receive premedication with dexamethazone, di-
`phenhydramine, and cimetidine before paclitaxel ad-
`ministration. In addition, special precautions for the
`intravenous administration set are necessary, and it is
`advisable for infusion to be given over 3–24 hours.1,2
`Despite these measures, severe hypersensitivity reac-
`tions are reported in 1.5–3% of patients, and more
`modest reactions are observed in almost half of pa-
`tients.3 A recently published article highlights this
`problem and suggests changing patients with allergic
`reactions to another taxane, docetaxel.4
`Intraarterial administration of taxanes has been
`considered only sporadically up to now.5,6 The pres-
`ence of alcohol in the commercial formulation and the
`problem of hypersensitivity reactions represent an ob-
`stacle to administration by this route, unless the drug
`is diluted considerably. A new polyoxyethylated castor
`oil free formulation of paclitaxel provided the oppor-
`tunity to assess intraarterial chemotherapy with this
`cytostatic agent in squamous cell carcinomas of the
`head and neck and of the anal canal.
`Few studies have been conducted to date on the
`activity of systemically administered taxanes in ad-
`vanced head and neck carcinoma. In these studies,
`intravenous paclitaxel as a single agent has shown
`superior activity to that of the standard combined
`chemotherapy (cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil)
`in recur-
`rences of these cancers, but the improvement was not
`very great. Overall, when more recent taxanes such as
`docetaxel are included, objective response rates (com-
`plete and partial clinical-radiologic) range from 30%
`to 42% in recurrences.7–9
`Less than 30% of patients with locally advanced
`disease (American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC]
`TNM Stage III/IV) can be cured with surgery and/or
`radiotherapy. The chemotherapy regimen that achieves
`a complete clinical response of 30–50% and greater is
`the combination of cisplatin and fluorouracil given at
`initial presentation of the disease. Combination with
`radiotherapy improves the results but at the cost of
`greater toxicity.10 –12 Despite this result, neoadjuvant
`chemotherapy has not brought an improvement in sur-
`vival, which depends more on locoregional recurrence
`than on distant metastases. A high T classification makes
`local recurrence more likely and is less amenable to
`clinical response and even less to complete pathologic
`response. Efforts to improve the results of neoadju-
`vant chemotherapy in advanced carcinoma of the oral
`cavity and hypopharynx are justified by the possibility
`
`FIGURE 1. Electron microscope enlargement
`(original magnification
`334,000) of paclitaxel-albumin nanoparticles (ABI-007).
`
`of achieving definitive local treatment by surgery or
`radiotherapy while maintaining an acceptable quality
`of life, including organ preservation.
`Cystostatic drugs have been given by intraarterial
`administration in the past, particularly since the in-
`troduction of cisplatin. The responses reported (clin-
`ical-radiologic, complete, and partial) range from 47%
`to 94% in patients with miscellaneous advanced dis-
`ease at presentation or with recurrence. The rate of
`catheter-related complications was greater
`than
`30%.13–16
`The expansion of interventional neuroradiology
`techniques, which now have high reproducibility and
`an acceptable complication rate, has led to the avail-
`ability of new materials for superselective catheteriza-
`tion, prompting renewed interest in intraarterial che-
`motherapy of the cervicofacial district.17–19 However,
`in this reappraisal of intraarterial chemotherapy, the
`drugs used thus far have been the same as in the past,
`and in no case have taxanes been used.
`ABI-007 is a new formulation of paclitaxel. Its
`novelty lies in the use of human albumin as a stabilizer
`in place of the usual excipients, polyoxyethylated cas-
`tor oil and alcohol. The particles of the paclitaxel-
`human albumin complex have a dimension of 150 –
`200 nm (Fig. 1), and the product takes the form of a
`colloid when suspended in saline solution. Animal
`studies have shown that the pharmacokinetic profile
`of ABI-007 differs from that of the commercial formu-
`lation (Taxol) in that it shows lower plasma levels and
`higher tissue levels with wider, more rapid distribu-
`tion and slower metabolism. ABI-007 is 59-fold less
`toxic than Taxol and 29-fold less toxic than the excipi-
`ents of Taxol.20 Preliminary results of clinical intrave-
`nous and intraarterial use were presented recent-
`ly.21,22
`The decision to study intraarterial chemotherapy
`
`Actavis - IPR2017-01101, Ex. 1017, p. 2 of 11
`
`

`

`2594
`
`CANCER November 15, 2001 / Volume 92 / Number 10
`
`with paclitaxel in albumin nanoparticles in patients
`with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck
`and of the anal canal was based on consideration of
`the mechanism of action of this drug and of the par-
`ticular problems posed by these two carcinomas. The
`antitumor efficacy of paclitaxel is related to its ability
`to stabilize microtubules. Alterations of microtubule
`dynamics may be of relevance not only in the mitotic
`spindle, but also in cytoskeleton functions. Because
`cytoskeleton is involved in signaling pathways medi-
`ated by growth factor receptors, the pharmacologic
`effects of taxanes could be at least in part caused by
`their interference with signal transduction. Because
`squamous cell carcinomas of different tissue origin
`(lung, head/neck, cervix) are characterized by overex-
`pression of epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptors,
`the efficacy of paclitaxel in the treatment of these
`tumor types could reflect an interference of this tax-
`ane in specific processes mediated by growth factor
`receptors. This hypothesis should be addressed by
`specific approaches of modulation of receptor func-
`tion. A better documentation of this additional molec-
`ular effect could allow a more rational design of clin-
`ical studies with taxanes.23
`Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal has a
`high curability rate at presentation when treated by a
`combination of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and sur-
`gery, but no further systemic therapeutic regimen is
`available for effective management of recurrence.24,25
`The rationale of intraarterial administration is rein-
`forced in this pathology by the critical nature of pelvic
`vascularization due to the previous treatments, which
`might make it difficult to achieve an effective local
`concentration of systemically administered cytostatic
`agents.
`The principal goals of the current study were 1) to
`determine the feasibility of intraarterial administra-
`tion of ABI-007, 2) to determine the maximum toler-
`ated dose (MTD), 3) to determine the dose-limiting
`toxicity, 4) to establish the recommended dose for a
`Phase II study, and 5) to seek preliminary evidence of
`antitumor activity.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`Comparative In Vitro Cytotoxic Evaluation of ABI-007
`and Taxol
`A comparative study of the cytotoxic effects of Taxol
`and ABI-007 was performed in two human ovarian
`carcinoma cell lines, including a cell line sensitive to
`cisplatin (IGROV-1) and a subline selected for resis-
`tance to cisplatin (IGROV-1/Pt1), exhibiting a col-
`lateral sensitivity to taxane and in a squamous cell
`carcinoma of the cervix (A431) exhibiting overex-
`pression of the EGF receptor. The cytotoxic activity
`
`FIGURE 2. Comparison of cytotoxic activity of paclitaxel (TX) and ABI-007 in
`ovarian cell carcinoma IGROV-1, in a subline selected for resistance to cisplatin
`IGROV-1/Pt 1 and in cervical squamous cell carcinoma cells. Cells were
`exposed to the drug for 24, 48, or 72 hours as indicated. The antiproliferative
`effect was determined by the growth inhibition assay (cell counting 72 hours
`after the start of exposure). IC50 values refer to drug concentrations required for
`50% inhibition of cell growth.
`
`was evaluated using an antiproliferative assay (de-
`termination of the number of surviving cells 72
`hours after drug exposure) and variable exposure
`times (24, 48, and 72 hours). The cell systems were
`chosen because the cytotoxic effect of paclitaxel was
`predictive of antitumor efficacy after in vivo treat-
`ment of tumor xenografts in athymic mice.
`Because the drug formulation could interfere
`with cellular uptake of the drug, a comparative cel-
`lular pharmacology study was performed to exam-
`ine the cytotoxic potential of the drug in various
`formulations using a panel of human tumor cell
`lines. The results are shown in Figure 2 as dose–
`response curves. It is evident that the cytotoxic ac-
`tivity of paclitaxel is retained completely in its for-
`mulation with albumin. Although the observed
`difference in cellular response should be regarded
`as marginal, an increased cytotoxicity of ABI-007
`was consistently found in all experiments. A similar
`result was found in the A431cell line, which exhib-
`ited an increased sensitivity to taxanes.
`
`Actavis - IPR2017-01101, Ex. 1017, p. 3 of 11
`
`

`

`Intraarterial Polyoxyethylated Castor Oil Free Paclitaxel/Damascelli et al.
`
`2595
`
`Group performance status of less than 2; previous
`chemotherapy, with exclusion of taxanes, completed
`at least 4 weeks before study enrollment; life expect-
`ancy longer than 3 months; and adequate bone mar-
`row (platelet count . 75,000 3 109 cells/L, absolute
`neutrophil count . 1.5 3 109 cells/L), hepatic function
`(total bilirubin within normal limits, transaminases
`, 2 times normal), and renal function (creatinine
`, 1.5 times the upper limit of normal). Patients with
`formal contraindications or in whom transfemoral
`catheterization/angiography was not possible and
`those with severe cardiopathy were excluded.
`Before enrollment in the trial, patients were re-
`quired to sign the informed consent document to be
`enrolled in the trial, which was approved by the Eth-
`ical and Scientific Committee of the institution.
`
`Dosage and Administration of ABI-007
`ABI-007 was supplied by American BioScience, Inc.
`(Los Angeles, CA) in vials containing a lyophil equal to
`30 mg of paclitaxel/albumin. The solution obtained by
`diluting each vial with 10 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride
`solution was administered over 30 minutes by selec-
`tive percutaneous catheterization of the neck vessels
`in patients with head and neck carcinoma, with access
`from the femoral artery under local anesthesia, with-
`out premedication. A guiding catheter (Envoy H1 5F;
`Cordis/Johnson & Johnson, Miami, FL) first was posi-
`tioned in the common carotid artery for digital an-
`giography. Bilateral catheterization was performed for
`tumors that exceeded the median line. Intraarterial
`chemotherapy was performed by selectively or super-
`selectively catheterizing the external carotid artery or
`its branches with coaxial microcatheters in a guiding
`catheter (Transit Infusion Catheter; Cordis/Johnson &
`Johnson).
`In patients with recurrence of anal canal carci-
`noma, unilateral or bilateral transfemoral percutane-
`ous catheterization of the internal iliac arteries was
`performed (Tempo 4 C3, 4F; Cordis/Johnson & John-
`son) after pelvic aortography, with placement of a
`coaxial microcatheter (Rapid Transit; Cordis/Johnson
`& Johnson) distal to the gluteal artery. To prevent
`clotting within the catheter, we used a continuous
`washing set of our own design produced by SIDAM
`(Mirandola,
`Italy). Three treatment cycles were
`planned for both groups of patients, with a 4-week
`interval between cycles (in 2 patients 4 cycles were
`performed). The hospital stay was 3 days for each
`cycle.
`The MTD was defined in this study as the dose
`level below that inducing dose-limiting toxicity in
`greater than a third of cycles at the same dose level (at
`least three cycles of a group of six).
`
`FIGURE 3. Carcinoma of left margin of tongue. At presentation (top left), after
`one cycle of ABI-007 into the lingual artery (top right), after two cycles (bottom
`left), after three cycles (bottom right). This patient received a fourth cycle of
`intraarterial chemotherapy, and no tumor was found at surgery. The patient
`also underwent total laterocervical lymph node resection with negative histol-
`ogy. The patient was disease free at last follow-up (10 months).
`
`FIGURE 4. Carcinoma of the tongue. Computed tomography with contrast
`medium (top left); the arrows indicate the tumor margins. Result after three
`cycles of intraarterial chemotherapy (top right). Angiogram of right common
`carotid artery (bottom left). Catheterization and angiography of lingual artery
`(bottom right).
`
`PATIENTS
`Patient Selection
`Patients considered eligible for this study were 1)
`those with histologic diagnosis of locally advanced
`squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck with or
`without previous treatment; and 2) patients with re-
`current squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal.
`Inclusion criteria were age older than 18 years and
`younger than 75 years; Eastern Cooperative Oncology
`
`Actavis - IPR2017-01101, Ex. 1017, p. 4 of 11
`
`

`

`2596
`
`CANCER November 15, 2001 / Volume 92 / Number 10
`
`The dose increase scheme was empiric and arbi-
`trarily designed by us.
`The starting dose of 120 mg/m2 was increased by
`30 mg/m2 at each subsequent level. Each level con-
`sisted of a group of six cycles. In the first 4 cycles,
`Grade 4 hematologic toxicity occurred in 3 cases in the
`group receiving 300 mg/m2. The MTD therefore was
`defined as 270 mg/m2. The total number of cycles
`“necessary” to define the dose-limiting toxicity and
`the MTD was 40 (29 cycles for 12 patients with head
`and neck carcinoma and 11 cycles for 6 patients with
`carcinoma of the anal canal).
`Of the 18 patients participating in dose escalation
`(5 of whom completed treatment after determination
`of the MTD, receiving 250 mg/m2 for the remaining
`cycles), 1) 8 patients received 3 cycles; 2) 6 patients
`received 2 cycles (1 discontinued treatment because of
`progression, 1 withdrew despite evidence of complete
`clinical response, and 4 received the third cycle at the
`dose 250 mg/m2), 3) 4 patients received only 1 cycle (1
`completed the treatment at 250 mg/m2, 2 discontin-
`ued it because of progression, 1 patient died after
`rupture of esophageal varices complicating concomi-
`tant cirrhosis).
`To better define the importance of the intraarte-
`rial chemotherapy procedure and make a preliminary
`evaluation of the tolerability of the ABI-007 dose to be
`recommended for Phase II study, we enrolled an ad-
`ditional 19 patients with head and neck carcinoma
`and 6 with recurrence of anal canal carcinoma. Treat-
`ment with 250 mg/m2 every 4 weeks for 3 cycles was
`planned for this additional group.
`
`Dose-Limiting Toxicities
`All toxicities were graded according to World Health
`Organization (WHO) toxicity criteria. The MTD, as
`already stated, was defined as the dose level below
`that which induced a limiting toxicity in at least three
`of six cycles. Grade 4 neutropenia lasting 5 days or
`longer, Grade 4 thrombocytopenia or anemia of any
`duration, and Grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicities
`were considered as dose-limiting.
`
`Pretreatment and Follow-Up Studies
`Complete clinical history, physical examination, he-
`matologic examination, serum electrolytes, and chem-
`istries were performed at the time of enrollment and
`before each cycle. Complete blood cell counts were
`taken weekly while patients were on study. Radiologic
`studies (computed tomographic scans or magnetic
`resonance imaging) were performed at baseline and
`before each treatment cycle to assess tumor response,
`which was graded according to WHO criteria.
`
`Pharmacokinetic Analyses
`To study the pharmacokinetics of ABI-007, extensive
`blood samples were drawn in 11 patients, from the
`superior vena cava (5 patients with head and neck
`carcinoma), from the inferior vena cava (6 patients
`with anal canal carcinoma), and from peripheral veins
`(11 patients) at multiple times during each infusion (at
`0, 5, 15, and 30 minutes) and up to 18 hours (at 35, 45,
`60, 90, 150, 270, 510, 750, and 1080 minutes).
`Whole blood paclitaxel concentrations were de-
`termined by high-performance liquid chromatogra-
`phy after solid phase extraction, as described by Willey
`et al.26 with some modifications. Standard curves were
`obtained using paclitaxel C (Indena, Milan, Italy) as
`internal standard. The drug quantitation limit was
`0.06 mmol/L and the linearity up to 30 mmol/L with a
`precision range between 8.1% and 18% and an accu-
`racy that exceeded 85%. The recovery of paclitaxel was
`95%. The same method was used to check the pacli-
`taxel contents in administered ABI-007 solutions.
`Pharmacokinetic modeling and parameters were
`performed using the nonlinear regression program
`Kinetica 2000 version 3.0 (Innaphase Co., Philadel-
`phia, PA). The concentration versus time curves were
`fitted using a three-compartment open pharmacoki-
`netic model.
`The data were compared with pharmacokinetic
`profiles with intravenous infusion of ABI-007 (Ibrahim
`NK, Ellehorst JA, Theriault RL, et al. Phase I and phar-
`macokinetic study of ABI-007, a cremophor-free, pro-
`tein-stabilized, nanoparticle formulation of paclitaxel,
`unpublished).
`
`RESULTS
`Thirty-one patients with head and neck carcinoma
`received a total of 86 cycles (median, 3). Twelve pa-
`tients with recurrent anal canal carcinoma received 34
`cycles (median, 3).
`Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1.
`
`Toxicity
`Tables 2 and 3 summarize the hematologic and non-
`hematologic toxicities of all grades observed in 12
`patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head
`and neck and in 6 patients with squamous cell carci-
`noma of the anal canal who participated in dose es-
`calation to define the MTD of intraarterial chemother-
`apy with ABI-007.
`Neutropenia was the main dose-limiting toxicity
`for intraarterial administration of paclitaxel. Of the
`three episodes recorded, two were short-lasting and
`did not require hospitalization. These episodes oc-
`curred in two patients with recurrent anal canal car-
`
`Actavis - IPR2017-01101, Ex. 1017, p. 5 of 11
`
`

`

`Intraarterial Polyoxyethylated Castor Oil Free Paclitaxel/Damascelli et al.
`
`2597
`
`TABLE 1
`Patient Characteristics
`
`Characteristic
`
`No. of patients
`Gender
`Male
`Female
`Age, median (range)
`Previous treatment
`Surgery 1 CHT 1 RT
`CHT 1 RT
`Surgery 1 RT
`Surgery
`CHT
`RT
`None
`Surgery 1 CHT
`Tumor site
`Tongue
`Maxillary sinus
`Floor of mouth
`Soft tissues of the neck
`Laryngopharynx
`Overlapping lesion of oro/
`hypopharynx
`Larynx
`Piriform sinus
`Retromolar trigone
`Oropharynx
`Overlapping lesion of
`tonsil and palate
`Lower pelvis
`
`Total
`
`43
`
`Head and neck
`carcinoma
`
`Anal canal
`carcinoma
`
`31
`
`12
`
`27
`16
`58 (36–75)
`
`25
`6
`63 (36–75)
`
`2
`10
`56 (41–75)
`
`5
`1
`3
`1
`2
`1
`17
`1
`
`10
`2
`1
`5
`3
`
`1
`1
`1
`2
`2
`
`3
`—
`
`5
`5
`—
`2
`—
`—
`—
`—
`
`—
`—
`—
`—
`—
`
`—
`—
`—
`—
`—
`
`—
`12
`
`CHT: chemotherapy; RT: radiation therapy.
`
`TABLE 2
`Hematologic Toxicity
`
`Cycles with neutropenia/grade
`
`Head and neck (grade)
`
`Anal canal (grade)
`
`Dose
`(mg/m2)
`
`Total no.
`of cycles
`
`120
`150
`180
`210
`240
`270
`300
`
`6
`6
`6
`6
`6
`6
`4
`
`1
`
`4
`2
`4
`2
`
`1
`
`2
`
`1
`
`1
`
`3
`
`4
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`1
`
`2
`
`1
`
`2
`
`cinoma who previously had been treated with radia-
`tion therapy (RT) and chemotherapy and with
`chemotherapy plus RT plus surgery, respectively. The
`third case was a patient with metastatic carcinoma of
`the head and neck from an unknown primary site,
`previously treated with RT and surgery and who also
`
`had cirrhosis with esophageal varices. The patient was
`admitted to the hospital because of rupture of the
`varices 6 days after intraarterial chemotherapy and
`died of esophageal bleeding.
`Neutropenia never was associated with infection,
`occurred approximately 8 days after the chemother-
`apy, and resolved within a week in the 2 assessable
`cases. At a dose of 270 mg/m2, Grade 4 neutropenia
`occurred in 1 previously untreated patient with carci-
`noma of the head and neck. Grade 2 neutropenia
`occurred in 15.7% of patients in the series with tumors
`of the head and neck treated with 250 mg/m2, and in
`33.3% in the much smaller series of patients with
`recurrent anal canal carcinoma.
`The most important nonhematologic toxicities
`from the point of view of their impact on the quality of
`life were neuropathy lasting approximately 2 weeks,
`flu-like syndrome (of shorter duration), and ocular
`toxicity (keratitis). All these toxicities, which were in
`any case of low grade, occurred in few patients treated
`at the dose of 250 mg/m2 (Table 4).
`
`Procedural Complications
`Of 120 percutaneous catheterizations, 3 complications
`(2.5%) were observed in 3 patients during catheteriza-
`tion of the neck vessels for infusion of ABI-007. These
`complications were two transient ischemic attacks
`and one hemiparesis, the latter resolving within a few
`days. The patient who had the hemiparesis previously
`had undergone surgery,
`including radical bilateral
`neck dissection, chemotherapy, and RT. The two ce-
`rebral transient ischemic attacks occurred in two pa-
`tients who had received previous treatment, one RT
`and one chemotherapy. In all three cases, the external
`carotid artery was selectively catheterized by the
`method described. The accidents occurred at the time
`of removal of the catheter, most likely due to detach-
`ment of debris at
`the carotid bifurcation, which
`showed atheromatous plaque in all three cases, par-
`ticularly in the patient with hemiparesis.
`No complications related to the catheterization
`procedure occurred in the population treated for re-
`current anal canal carcinoma.
`
`Antitumor Activity
`Forty of 43 patients were assessable for antitumor
`activity of intraarterial chemotherapy with ABI-007.
`Three patients (all previously treated with combined
`regimens) received only one cycle and were not as-
`sessable: one died after rupture of esophageal varices
`complicating cirrhosis and the other two discontinued
`treatment because of disease progression. The latter
`two patients were treated with alternative chemother-
`apy regimens without success.
`
`Actavis - IPR2017-01101, Ex. 1017, p. 6 of 11
`
`

`

`2598
`
`CANCER November 15, 2001 / Volume 92 / Number 10
`
`TABLE 3
`Nonhematologic Toxicity for Head and Neck Carcinoma and Anal Canal Carcinoma
`
`Total
`no. of
`cycles
`
`6
`6
`5
`5
`2
`3
`2
`
`1
`
`2
`
`1
`3
`
`3
`
`Dose (mg/m2)
`
`Head and neck
`carcinoma
`120
`150
`180
`210
`240
`270
`300
`
`Neuropathy
`(grade)
`
`Gastrointestinal
`(grade)
`
`Flu syndrome
`(grade)
`
`Ocular (grade)
`
`Cutaneous (grade)
`
`Alopecia (grade)
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`1
`
`1
`
`2
`
`2
`1
`1
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`1
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`1
`1
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`
`4
`
`1
`
`1
`
`2
`
`4
`2
`2
`2
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`1
`
`1
`1
`
`1
`1
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`3
`
`4
`
`1
`
`1
`
`3
`
`4
`
`2
`
`3
`3
`4
`5
`2
`2
`1
`
`Neuropathy
`
`Gastrointestinal
`
`Flu syndrome
`
`Cutaneous
`
`Alopecia
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`Dose (mg/m2)
`
`Anal canal carcinoma
`120
`150
`180
`210
`240
`270
`300
`
`Total No.
`of Cycles
`
`—
`—
`1
`1
`4
`3
`2
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`
`2
`1
`
`1
`2
`2
`1
`
`2
`
`1
`
`2
`
`1
`3
`3
`1
`
`TABLE 4
`Hematologic and Nonhematologic Toxicity in 25 Patients Treated Intraarterially with ABI-007 at a Dose of 250 mg/m2
`(Total of 80 Cycles, Median 3)
`
`Characteristic
`
`Total
`
`Head and neck cancer
`
`Anal canal cancer
`
`1 (%)
`
`2 (%)
`
`3 (%)
`
`4 (%)
`
`1 (%)
`
`2 (%)
`
`3 (%)
`
`4 (%)
`
`Grade
`
`Grade
`
`25
`
`19
`
`3
`16
`64 (36–72)
`
`6
`
`5
`1
`57 (41–64)
`
`No. of patients
`Gender
`Female
`Male
`Age, median (range)
`Hematologic toxicity
`Nonhematologic toxicity
`Alopecia
`Gastrointestinal
`Flu-like syndrome
`Cutaneous
`Ocular
`Neurologic
`
`47.3
`
`15.7
`
`6
`7
`7
`1
`1
`4
`
`12
`1
`3
`2
`
`1
`
`50.0
`
`16.6
`1
`3
`
`2
`
`33.3
`
`83.3
`1
`3
`1
`
`1
`
`Of the 40 assessable patients, 29 belonged to the
`head and neck carcinoma group in which there were 3
`complete responses (2 pathologic and 1 clinical). The
`three patients had received no previous treatment and
`were treated with radical surgery (1 patient with car-
`cinoma of the tongue who had received 4 cycles), with
`radical neck dissection and radiotherapy (1 patient
`
`with carcinoma of the piriform sinus), and with sur-
`gery and radiotherapy (1 case of carcinoma of the
`retromolar trigone).
`Nineteen partial responses were observed in head
`and neck carcinomas (6 previously treated patients
`and 13 not previously treated). The sum of complete
`and partial responses was 75.85% (complete response,
`
`Actavis - IPR2017-01101, Ex. 1017, p. 7 of 11
`
`

`

`Intraarterial Polyoxyethylated Castor Oil Free Paclitaxel/Damascelli et al.
`
`2599
`
`FIGURE 5. Carcinoma of right piriform sinus. Computed tomography (CT) of
`pharynx/larynx with arrows indicating the tumor margins (top left). CT with
`arrows indicating adenopathy (top right). CT after third cycle of intraarterial
`chemotherapy (bottom left); arrow indicates the primary tumor site no longer
`evident at histologic examination. CT of neck also shows a partial response for
`adenopathy (bottom right).
`
`FIGURE 6. Recurrent anal canal carcinoma. Computed tomography (CT) with
`contrast medium at presentation (top left). CT after first cycle of chemotherapy
`via the internal iliac arteries (top right). CT after second cycle (bottom left). CT
`after third cycle (bottom right).
`It
`is not possible with imaging alone to
`determine whether tumor is still present. No tumor was found at surgery. The
`patient was disease free at last follow-up (4 months).
`
`10.34%; partial response, 65.51%; Figs. 3–5). The six
`previously treated patients were offered alternative
`chemotherapy. Of the 13 not previously treated, 9
`received surgery after intraarterial chemotherapy, 1
`chemotherapy, 1 RT, and 2 RT and chemotherapy. Six
`
`FIGURE 7. (A and B) Mean paclitaxel concentration versus time profiles in
`patients with head and neck (A) or anal canal (B) carcinomas during and after
`30-minute constant infusion of ABI-007 (250 mg/m2 of paclitaxel). The dotted
`line in each panel represents the profile of an intravenous injected dose. iv:
`intravenous; ia: intraarterial; svc: superior vena cava; ivc: inferior vena cava.
`
`of the remaining seven assessable patients had re-
`ceived previous treatment, and of these one pro-
`gressed, four had stable disease, and one developed a
`massive tumor necrosis with fistulization after the sec-
`ond cycle of intraarterial chemotherapy, and therefore
`treatment was discontinued. The last patient, not pre-
`viously treated, showed stable disease.
`In the 22 responding patients, the median dura-
`tion of follow-up for patients who had not received
`previous treatment was 12 months (range, 3–13
`months); for previously treated patients, the median
`was 5 months (range, 3–13 months).
`Twelve previously treated patients belonged to the
`group with recurrent anal canal carcinoma. Eleven of
`these were assessable; one patient received only one
`cycle and showed progression. Three complete re-
`sponses were recorded, two pathologic and one clin-
`ical. One patient with pathologic complete response
`received four cycles of ABI-007 (Fig. 6); the patient
`with clinical complete response received two cycles
`after which she refused to continue treatment because
`she wished to be reoperated on as soon as possible.
`Four patients showed partial response, three previ-
`
`Actavis - IPR2017-01101, Ex. 1017, p. 8 of 11
`
`

`

`2600
`
`CANCER November 15, 2001 / Volume 92 / Number 10
`
`TABLE 5
`ABI-007 Pharmacokinetic Parameters
`
`Cancer
`type
`
`Head and
`neck
`
`Anal
`canal
`
`Solid
`tumors
`
`Administration
`
`Sampling
`
`Paclitaxel
`(mg/m2)
`
`No. of
`patients
`
`Cmax
`(mg/L)
`
`Tmax
`(min)
`
`a
`T1/2
`(min)
`
`b
`T1/2
`(min)
`
`g
`T1/2
`(min)
`
`AUC (mg/L
`min)
`
`Vss (L)
`
`Cl (L/min)
`
`i.a. infusion
`
`i.a. infusion
`i.a. infusion
`
`i.a. infusion
`i.v. infusion
`
`Superior vena
`cava
`Peripheral vein
`Inferior vena
`cava
`Peripheral vein
`Peripheral vein
`
`250
`
`250
`250
`
`250
`250
`
`5
`
`5
`6
`
`6
`8
`
`21.01 (6.5)
`
`7.53 (1.8)
`18.58 (5.9)
`
`7.45 (2.6)
`9.944 (3.1)
`
`30
`
`30
`30
`
`30
`30
`
`0.45
`
`3.42
`1.94
`
`15.13
`
`38.35
`13.61
`
`3.066
`7.35
`
`14.64
`114.88
`
`560.59
`
`1146.0 (280)
`
`107.55 (85)
`
`0.338 (0.18)
`
`764.67
`529.47
`
`530.22
`932.87
`
`753.52 (150)
`872.29 (210)
`
`345.55 (45)
`114.86 (73)
`
`0.536 (0.09)
`0.445 (0.1)
`
`548.58 (120)
`761.86 (140)
`
`244.56 (58)
`312.27 (40)
`
`0.707 (0.21)
`0.509 (0.12)
`
`AUC: area under the curve; i.a.: intraarterial; i.v.: intravenous.
`
`ously treated with chemotherapy and RT and 1 with
`surgery. The remaining four patients (36.36%) showed
`stable disease. All assessable patients had surgical
`control (reoperation in six cases). The median dura-
`tion of follow-up in responding patients (7 cases) was
`10 months (range, 7–13 months).
`
`Pharmacokinetics
`The concentration/time curve calculated on samples
`from the superior vena cava and peripheral veins is
`shown in Figure 7 and compared with the profile of
`the same do

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket