throbber
orip
`
`Phase II Study of Weekly Albumin Bound
`Paclitaxel for Patients with Metastatic Breast
`Cancer Heavily Pretreated with Taxanes
`Joanne L Blum13 Michael A Savin23 Gerald Ede1man23
`John E Pippen13 Nicholas J Robert3 Brian V Geister3
`Robert L Kirby23 Alicia Clawson4 Joyce A OShaughnessy13
`
`Abstract
`Purpose Nanoparticle albumin bound paclitaxel
`a solvent free albumin bound paclitaxel demonstrated
`antitumor activity in patients with taxanenaive metastatic breast cancer MBC We examined albumin bound
`paclitaxel 100 mgm2 or 125 mgm2 administered weekly to determine the antitumor activity
`in patients
`with MBC whose disease progressed despite conventional
`taxane therapy Patients and Methods Women with
`MBC that was previously treated with taxanes were eligible for participation
`Taxane failure was defined as
`metastatic disease progression during taxane therapy or relapse within 12 months of adjuvant
`taxane therapy
`Primary objectives were response rates RRs and the safetytolerability of albumin bound paclitaxel Results
`Women were treated with albumin bound paclitaxel 100 mgm2 n = 106 or 125 mgm2 n = 75 on days
`1 8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle Response rates were 14 and 16 for the 100mgm2 and 125mgm2
`cohorts respectively an additional 12 and 21 of patients respectively had stable disease SD 16 weeks
`times were 3 months at 100 mgm2 and 35 months at 125 mgm2 median
`Median progression free survival
`times were 92 months and 91 months respectively Survival was similar for responding patients and
`those with SD No severe hypersensitivity reactions were reported Patients who developed treatment limiting
`dose of albumin bound paclitaxel after a
`peripheral neuropathy typically could be restarted on a reduced
`in < 5 of patients Conclusion Albumin bound paclitaxel
`12week delay Grade 4 neutropenia occurred
`100 mgm2 given weekly demonstrated the same antitumor activity as albumin bound paclitaxel 125 mgm2
`weekly and a more favorable safety profile in patients with MBC that had progressed with previous
`taxane
`therapy Survival of patients with SD
`16 weeks was similar to that of responders
`
`survival
`
`Clinical Breast Cancer Vol 7 No 11 850856 2007
`Key words Absolute neutrophil count Dose reduction
`Peripheral neuropathy Progressive disease Stable disease
`
`Introduction
`
`albuminbound paclitaxel
`Nanoparticle
`vent free 130nanometer
`
`particle formulation of paclitaxel
`
`is a novel sol
`
`1Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center Dallas
`2Texas Oncology PA Dallas
`3US Oncology Houston
`Texas
`
`Inc Los Angeles CA
`4Abraxis BioScience
`Current affiliation Cancer Care Associates Oklahoma City OK
`
`Submitted Aug 3 2007 Revised Oct 10 2007 Accepted Oct 22 2007
`Joanne L Blum MD PhD Texas Oncology
`Address for correspondence
`PA 3535 Worth St Dallas TX 75246
`Fax 2143701060 email joanneblumusoncologycom
`
`is
`
`Results of animal human xenograft studies of albuminbound
`indicate that the active ingredient paclitaxel
`paclitaxell
`distributed into tumor tissue more rapidly and at higher
`concentrations with this new formulation than with conven
`tional solvent based paclitaxe12 In a phase II clinical study
`albumin bound paclitaxel was tolerated at a higher dose
`300 mgm2 every 3 weeks than that approved for the sol
`vent based formulation 175 mgm2 every 3 weeks and was
`tolerated3 In addition the infusion time is shorter
`well
`for
`albumin bound paclitaxel
`than for solvent based paclitaxel
`30 minutes vs 3 hours and the nab formulation can be
`given without steroid or antihistamine premedication
`spe
`infusion sets or in line filters
`
`cial
`
`forwarding or copying is a violation of US and International Copyright Laws
`Electronic
`Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use or the internal or personal use of specific clients is granted by CIG Media Group LP
`ISSN 15268209 provided the appropriate fee is paid directly to Copyright Clearance Center 222 Rosewood Drive Danvers MA 01923 USA 9787508400
`
`850
`
`Clinical Breast Cancer December 2007
`
`Abraxis EX2016
`Actavis LLC v Abraxis Bioscience LLC
`1PR201701101 1PR201701103 1PR201701104
`
`

`

`naive metastatic
`
`breast
`
`response
`
`rate
`
`In a phase III study albuminbound paclitaxel was com
`pared with solvent based paclitaxel
`in patients with taxane
`cancer MBC4 Albumin bound
`paclitaxel demonstrated a significantly higher
`RR 33 vs 19 P = 001 and significantly
`time
`longer
`to tumor progression 23 weeks vs 169 weeks hazard ratio
`075 P = 006 than the solvent based formulation
`of solvent based paclitaxel have
`schedules
`been
`Weekly
`compared with every 3week schedules in patients with breast
`in 2 phase III studies56 Weekly paclitaxel demonstrat
`cancer
`ed greater antitumor activity than the every 3week regimen
`but was associated with increased rates of neurotoxicity
`The current study was designed to explore albuminbound
`whether albumin bound paclitaxel 100 mgm2 or 125 mgm2
`administered weekly for 3 weeks followed by 1 week of rest
`has antitumor activity in patients with MBC that had pro
`gressed with conventional
`taxane therapy
`
`Patients and Methods
`The protocol was approved by the US Oncology
`Review Board and the study was conducted
`in compliance
`with Good Clinical Practice guidelines of the International
`on Harmonization Each patient provided written
`Conference
`informed consent before the study drug was administered
`
`Institutional
`
`Patients
`Women
`
`18 years had histologically or cytologically
`aged
`confirmed breast cancer with evidence of recurrence or metas
`tasis that was measurable according
`to Response Evaluation
`Criteria in Solid Tumors RECIST7 Patients must have devel
`oped progressive disease PD while receiving a taxane for their
`metastatic disease or relapsed within 12 months of taxanecon
`therapy Patients with HER2positive MBC
`taining adjuvant
`must have been treated previously with trastuzumab Patients
`had to have adequate hematologic hepatic and renal function
`and expected survival of > 12 weeks
`they had
`Patients were excluded from participation if
`serious con
`evidence
`of active brain metastases
`current illness a Southwest Oncology Group performance
`score of > 2 or peripheral neuropathy of grade > 1 based on
`National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria NCI
`CTC Version 20 No restriction was placed on enrollment
`based on the number of previous chemotherapy regimens
`
`clinical
`
`125 mgm2 weekly on days 1 8 and
`of patients to receive
`15 followed by 1 week of rest Separate analyses were con
`ducted for each cohort
`to determine whether
`the higher dose
`was associated with greater antitumor activity
`
`Treatment
`Patients received albumin bound paclitaxel 100 mgm2 or
`125 mgm2 IN over 30 minutes without steroid or antihista
`mine premedication recombinant human granulocyte colony
`
`stimulating factor support specialized infusion sets or in line
`filters Doses were administered on days 1 8 and 15 and fol
`lowed by 1 week of rest every 28 days 4 week cycle Patients
`continued on treatment until disease progression or unac
`
`required dose
`ceptable toxicity occurred If an adverse event
`interruption albumin bound paclitaxel dosing was reinitiated
`
`the patients absolute
`
`1500 cellsµL platelet count was
`
`at the start of a treatment cycle only if
`neutrophil count ANC was
`100000 cellsµL or any other toxicity had resolved to grade
`1 For each subsequent albumin bound paclitaxel dose within a
`treatment cycle days 8 and 15 patients had to have an ANC
`1000 cellsA and a platelet count
`75000 cellspct
`Up to 2 dose reductions were permitted for patients who
`sepsis grade 34 thrombocytopenia
`had febrile neutropenia
`neurotoxicity or any other grade 34 nonhematologic
`toxic
`ity Dose reductions were from 100 mgm2 to 80 mgm2 to
`60 mgm2 or from 125 mgm2 to 100 mgm2 to 75 mgm2
`
`target
`
`Assessments
`Tumor lesions were measured using RECIST at baseline
`and at
`the end of every other
`treatment cycle7 Response
`analyses were based on investigator evaluation of radiologi
`cally and clinically detected
`lesions and were catego
`rized according to RECIST Responses
`to treatment were
`4 weeks after the initial documen
`confirmed by restaging
`tation of response An early stopping rule was incorporated
`into the study design which mandated that
`the study be
`stopped if no objective responses were observed in the first 30
`patients thereby ruling out at the P = 05 level that the RR
`to albuminbound paclitaxel
`in this patient population was
`10 Stable disease SD was evaluated after a minimum
`16 weeks
`of 4 cycles ie at
`
`Adverse events were coded using the Medical Dictionary
`for Regulatory Activities and then mapped to appropriate
`NCI CTC terms
`
`II study was designed to evalu
`
`Study Design
`This open label phase
`ate the antitumor activity overall RR ORM safety and
`tolerability of weekly albumin bound paclitaxel
`in patients
`with MBC that had previously been treated with taxanes
`objectives were to evaluate progression free sur
`
`Secondary
`
`vival PFS and overall survival OS
`Initially patients were planned to receive albuminbound
`IV over 30 minutes
`paclitaxel 100 mgm2 intravenously
`on days 1 8 and 15 followed by 1 week of rest Because
`minimal toxicity was observed with this dose and schedule
`the protocol was amended to include an additional
`
`cohort
`
`endpoint was
`
`Statistical Methods
`The primary efficacy
`the percentage
`patients who achieved
`a confirmed objective complete or
`partial response PR ie ORR Secondary
`efficacy endpoints
`of patients who achieved SD after
`were the percentage
`weeks PFS and OS Disease control
`rate was defined as the
`a complete or PR plus
`of patients who achieved
`percentage
`those who had SD for
`16 weeks Safety and tolerability
`
`of
`
`16
`
`endpoints were the incidences of adverse events hematologic
`nadir and the percentages of patients who discontinued study
`
`treatment or had their doses reduced or treatment delayed
`
`Clinical Breast Cancer December 2007
`
`851
`
`

`

`Albumin Bound Paclitaxel
`
`for TaxanePretreated MBC
`
`Table IA Patient Demographics and Other Baseline
`Characteristics N = 181
`
`Table IB Patient Demographics and Other Baseline
`Characteristics N = 181
`
`Albumin Bound Paclitaxel
`
`100 mgm2
`n = 106
`
`125 mgm2
`n = 75
`
`106
`
`75
`
`53 3476
`8681
`
`53 3374
`56 75
`
`2019
`
`19 25
`
`90 85
`7 7
`4 4
`3 3
`2 2
`
`105
`
`48 46
`
`5149
`5 5
`1 <1
`
`58 77
`6 8
`11 15
`
`75
`
`34 45
`
`32 43
`
`9 12
`
`0
`
`Characteristic
`
`Previous Taxane Therapy on a
`Weekly Schedule for Metastatic
`Disease
`
`Number of patients
`
`Paclitaxel
`
`Docetaxel
`
`Paclitaxeldocetaxel
`
`Previous Adjuvant
`
`Chemotherapy
`
`Any
`
`Anthracyclinecontaining
`
`Taxa necontaining
`
`Patients with Metastatic Breast
`Cancer
`that Progressed with
`Previous Taxane Therapy
`
`Tumor progression while on
`taxane
`therapy for metastatic
`
`disease
`
`Paclitaxel
`
`Albumin Bound Paclitaxel
`
`100 mgm2
`n = 106
`
`125 mgm2
`n = 75
`
`58
`
`23 40
`
`20 34
`
`1526
`
`85 80
`
`80 75
`
`3129
`
`41
`
`1844
`
`1537
`
`8 20
`
`59 79
`
`42 56
`
`20 27
`
`93 88
`
`67 89
`
`20 27
`
`Characteristic
`
`No of Patients
`
`Median Age Years Range
`<65
`
`> 65
`
`Ethnicity
`
`White
`
`Black
`
`HispanicLatino
`
`Asian
`
`Unknown
`
`SWOG Performance Score
`
`Number of patients
`
`0
`
`1 2 3
`
`30 28
`
`34 32
`29 27
`
`1312
`
`28 37
`1925
`
`811
`
`3 07
`
`3114
`
`59 56
`
`4341
`1 < 1
`33
`
`49 65
`
`2635
`
`0
`
`0
`
`Docetaxel
`
`Paclitaxeldocetaxel
`
`sequential
`
`Relapse within 12 months of
`adjuvant taxane therapy
`
`Median Number of Previous
`Chemotherapy Regimens for
`Metastatic Disease Range
`
`Preexisting Peripheral
`Neuropathy by Grade
`
`0
`
`1 2 U
`
`nknown
`
`Patients
`
`can appear
`
`in > 1 dosing regimen category
`
`Results
`
`Between May 31 2002 and December 29 2003 181
`patients were enrolled at 43 sites in the United States
`Table 1 106 patients
`received albumin bound paclit
`axel 100 mgm2 under
`the original protocol 75 additional
`the protocol amendment and
`patients were enrolled under
`received albuminbound paclitaxel 125 mgm2
`
`Efficacy
`The early stopping rule was not activated
`because
`responses to albumin bound paclitaxel occurred in some of
`the 30 initial patients Thus the stopping rule had no effect
`on the conduct
`of the study
`Complete or PRs were reported for 15 patients 14 in the
`100 mgm2 cohort and 12 patients 16 in the 125mgm2
`
`99 93
`7 7
`
`1 <1
`2 2
`34 32
`
`69 65
`
`105
`
`99 94
`6 6
`23 22
`
`6158
`
`73 69
`5 5
`3129
`
`7195
`4 5
`
`0
`
`4 5
`19 25
`
`52 69
`
`75
`
`67 89
`811
`26 35
`
`4155
`
`43 57
`811
`19 25
`
`Menopause Status
`
`Postmenopausal
`
`Premenopausal
`
`Total Number of
`Metastatic Organ Sites
`
`0
`
`1 2
`
`3
`
`>3
`
`Dominant Lesion Site
`
`Number of patients
`
`Visceral
`
`Nonvisceral
`
`Previous Trastuzumab Therapy
`
`Previous Taxane
`by Schedule
`
`Therapy
`
`Weekly
`
`Every 3 weeks
`
`Some other schedule
`
`Multiple schedules
`
`Baseline
`
`evaluation was
`
`not available for
`
`1 patient who was
`
`considered a
`
`non responder
`Abbreviation SWOG = Southwest Oncology Group
`
`The following were presented for each dose cohort for the
`primary efficacy analysis sample size number and percent
`age of patients with a confirmed complete or PR and 95
`interval for the RR All patients who
`binomial confidence
`1 dose of albumin bound paclitaxel were included
`received
`in the response and toxicity analyses
`
`852
`
`Clinical Breast Cancer December 2007
`
`

`

`Joanne L Blum et al
`
`Table 2 Overall Response and Disease Control Rates N = 181
`
`Number of Patients
`95 Cl
`P Value
`
`Response
`
`Complete response
`
`Partial
`
`response
`
`Stable disease
`
`16 weeks
`
`Number of Patients by Previous Taxane Therapy for
`Metastatic Disease
`
`By drug
`
`Paclitaxel
`
`Docetaxel
`
`Paclitaxeldocetaxel
`
`By schedule any taxanet
`
`Weekly
`
`Every 3 weeks
`
`Number of Patients by Previous Weekly Taxane Therapy for
`Metastatic Disease
`
`Paclitaxel
`
`Docetaxel
`
`Paclitaxeldocetaxel
`
`Albumin Bound Paclitaxel
`
`Overall Response Rate
`
`Disease Control Rate
`
`100 mgm2
`n = 106
`
`15 of 106 14
`7522079
`
`125 mgm2
`n = 75
`
`12 of 75 16
`77243
`
`100 mgm2
`n = 106
`
`28 of 106 26
`18023481
`
`125 mgm2
`n = 75
`
`28 of 75 37
`
`26394828
`
`7309
`
`1175
`
`0
`
`15 of 106 14
`
`1 of 75 1
`11 of 75 15
`
`0
`
`15 of 106 14
`
`1 of 75 1
`11 of 75 15
`
`13 of 106 12
`
`16 of 75 21
`
`4 of 30 13
`
`7 of 34 21
`2 of 29 7
`
`4 of 20 20
`
`6 of 28 21
`
`0
`
`9 of 30 30
`
`9 of 20 45
`
`11 of 34 32
`
`13 of 28 46
`
`6 of 29 21
`
`4 of 19 21
`
`7 of 58 12
`
`6 of 48 13
`
`7 of 41 17
`
`4 of 29 14
`
`14 of 58 24
`
`13 of 48 27
`
`16 of 41 39
`
`9 of 29 31
`
`0
`
`6 of 20 30
`1 of 15 7
`
`3 of 18 17
`4 of 15 27
`
`0
`
`3 of 23 13
`8 of 20 40
`
`3 of 15 20
`
`6 of 18 33
`7 of 15 47
`
`3 of 8 38
`
`rate is the completePRs plus SD
`16 weeks
`Disease control
`tFive additional patients in the 125mgm2 cohort received
`
`taxanes as adjuvant therapy
`
`an additional
`
`16 weeks was observed in
`
`cohort Table 2 Stable disease for
`13 patients 12 in the 100mgm2 cohort and
`16 patients 21 in the 125mgm2 cohort Median PFS was 3
`months for 100 mgm2 and 35 months for 125 mgm2 Median
`OS was 92 months and 91 months respectively Overall sur
`vival was similar for patients with confirmed responses and
`16 weeks P = 7106 logrank
`for nonresponders with SD
`Figure 1 Based on Kaplan Meier curves for patient survival
`the probability of surviving 1 year was 39 and 32 for the
`100mgm2 and 125mgm2 cohorts respectively No statistical
`ly significant differences in ORR disease control rate or PFS
`were observed between the 100mgm2 and 125mgm2 cohorts
`or between patients who achieved
`response and
`an objective
`16 weeks Table 2 Figure 1
`Four patients 4 in the 100mgm2 cohort and 7 patients
`nonresponders who had SD
`9 in the 125 mgm2 cohort had SD for
`
`24 weeks
`Of the patients who received previous taxane therapy on
`a weekly schedule the percentage of objective responders
`was greater at both dose levels for those who had received
`alone 30 with albumin bound paclitaxel
`docetaxel
`100 mgm2 27 with 125 mgm2 than for those who had
`received paclitaxel alone 0 for 100 mgm2 17 for 125 mgm2
`
`Table 2 No significant differences in objective response or
`rates according to hormone receptor status
`or site of metastatic disease were seen with albuminbound
`
`disease control
`
`paclitaxel
`
`treatment Table 3
`
`cohort
`
`in the
`
`Safety
`Treatment was well tolerated 87 of patients
`100mgm2 cohort and 68 of patients in the 125mgm2
`received albuminbound
`the protocol
`paclitaxel at
`the study Patients received a mean
`specified dose throughout
`of 53 and 47 cycles of albuminbound paclitaxel
`treatment
`in the 100mgm2 and 125mgm2 dose groups respectively
`a mean of 152 doses in the 100mgm2
`Patients received
`cohort and 131 doses in the 125mgm2 cohort median cumu
`lative doses were 9005 mgm2 and 1125 mgm2 respectively
`The median delivered dose intensity was 98 mgm2 range 36
`103 mgm2 per week in the 100mgm2 cohort and 114 mgm2
`range 77131 mgm2 per week in the 125mgm2 cohort
`Treatment related adverse
`events all grades resulted in
`
`of therapy for 6 patients 6 in the 100
`mgm2 cohort and 7 patients 9 in the 125 mgm2 cohort
`
`discontinuation
`
`primarily for sensory neuropathy dose reductions for 13
`
`Clinical Breast Cancer December 2007
`
`853
`
`

`

`Albumin Bound Paclitaxel
`
`for TaxanePretreated MBC
`
`cohorts Table 4 Grade 4 febrile neutropenia occurred in 1
`< 1 in the 100mgm2 cohort
`
`in either
`
`9 patients 8 developed treat
`
`loss
`
`patient
`No treatment related grade 4 nonhematologic
`adverse
`in either group No
`events were reported for > 1 patient
`reactions were observed
`severe hypersensitivity
`group despite the absence of steroid premedication
`In the 100mgm2 cohort
`ment related grade
`3 sensory neuropathy ie sensory
`or paresthesia interfering with activities of daily living 3 of
`whom had preexisting grade
`onset occurred
`1 neuropathy
`after a median of 5 treatment cycles range 123 cycles In the
`14 patients 19 developed grade 3 sen
`125mgm2 cohort
`sory neuropathy 3 of whom had preexisting grade 1 peripheral
`onset occurred after a median of 3 cycles range
`neuropathy
`26 cycles Of the 23 patients with grade 3 sensory neuropathy
`both cohorts combined 15 patients restarted albumin bound
`treatment at a reduced dosage 4 patients continued
`
`paclitaxel
`
`treatment
`
`on schedule with no treatment modification
`
`3
`
`patients discontinued treatment and 1 patient discontinued
`treatment because of PD at the time grade 3 sensory neuropa
`thy occurred Patients who continued treatment were able to
`resume dosing typically in 12 weeks
`Treatment related alopecia was reported in both groups In
`16 patients 15 had grade 1 mild
`the 100mgm2 cohort
`alopecia and 37 patients 35 had grade 2 pronounced alo
`pecia in the 125mgm2 cohort 3 patients 4 and 36 patients
`48 reported grade 12 alopecia respectively However many
`of the patients in this heavily pretreated study population 31
`in the 100mgm2 cohort 41 in the 125mgm2 cohort had
`the toxicity profile
`alopecia at time of enrollment In general
`65 years was similar to that for patients
`aged < 65 years in both cohorts Figure 2
`
`for patients aged
`
`Figure 1
`
`Survival Curves for the 100mgm2 and 125mgm2
`Cohorts Combined N = 181
`
`Confirmed Responders
`Stable Disease
`16 weeks
`
`Nonresponders
`
`100
`
`751
`
`501
`
`251
`
`fSurvival
`
`Probabilityo
`
`P= 7106
`
`3
`
`6
`
`9
`
`12
`
`15
`
`18
`
`21
`
`24
`
`27
`
`30
`
`Months
`
`responders n = 27 patients with SD
`Confirmed
`16 weeks
`confirmed responders n = 29 and nonresponders n = 125 Survival was
`similar for patients with confirmed responses and nonresponders with SD
`16
`weeks P = 7106 log rank
`
`excluding
`
`patients 12 and 24 patients 32 in the 100mgm2
`and 125mgm2 cohorts respectively primarily for sensory
`neuropathy and dose delays for 19 patients 18 and 32
`patients 43 in the 100mgm2 and 125mgm2 cohorts
`
`respectively primarily for neutropenia
`
`Despite the high degree of pretreatment grade 4 neutro
`
`penia and leukopenia occurred in < 5 of patients in both
`
`Table 3
`
`Response Rates by Hormone Receptor Status and Site of Metastatic Disease N = 181
`
`Number of Patients by Hormone Receptor Status
`ER PgR+
`ER
`PgRHER2+
`ER PgR
`HER2Number
`of Patients by Site of Metastatic Disease
`
`Bone
`
`Lungs
`
`Liver
`
`Lymph nodes
`
`Abdoment
`
`Skin
`
`Albumin Bound Paclitaxel
`
`Overall Response Rate
`
`Disease Co ntrol Rate
`
`100 mgm2
`n = 106
`
`125 mgm2
`n = 75
`
`100 mgm2
`n = 106
`
`125 mgm2
`n = 75
`
`5 of 39 13
`1 of 13 8
`4 of 35 11
`
`3 of 21 14
`
`10 of 44 23
`
`8 of 7511
`
`7 of 66 11
`
`4 of 22 18
`
`4 of 14 24
`
`0
`
`5 of 31 16
`
`2 of 11 18
`
`6 of 37 16
`1 of 714
`
`4 of 31 13
`4 of 46 9
`5 of 48 10
`
`3 of 1323
`
`2 of 1414
`
`3 of 1030
`
`11 of 39 28
`1 of 138
`10 of 35 29
`
`5 of 21 24
`
`17 of 44 39
`
`16 of 7521
`
`13 of 66 20
`
`5 of 22 23
`
`5 of 1436
`
`3 of 1030
`
`15 of 31 48
`
`3 of 11 27
`
`14 of 3738
`
`1 of 7 14
`
`11 of 31 35
`
`14 of 46 30
`
`16 of 48 33
`
`6 of 1346
`
`5 of 1436
`
`5 of 1050
`
`Disease control
`
`16 weeks
`
`rate is completePRs plus SD
`tPeritoneal carcinomatosis
`ER = estrogen receptor
`
`Abbreviations
`
`PgR = progesterone receptor
`
`854
`
`Clinical Breast Cancer December 2007
`
`

`

`Joanne L Blum et al
`
`Table 4
`
`Treatment Related ToxicitiesAdverse Events by Grade N = 181
`Albumin Bound Paclitaxel
`
`Adverse Event
`
`100 mgm2 n = 106
`
`125 mgm2 n = 7
`
`5
`
`Grade 2
`
`Grade 3
`
`Grade 4
`
`Grade 2
`
`Grade 3
`
`Grade 4
`
`Hematologict
`
`Leukopenia
`
`Neutropenia
`
`Non hematologic
`
`Fatigue
`
`Sensory neuropathy
`
`Nausea
`
`Diarrhea
`
`Vomiting
`
`Alopecia
`
`46 45
`
`3231
`
`34 32
`
`18 17
`
`11 10
`8 8
`77
`37 35
`
`2 3
`2 3
`
`1919
`
`1414
`
`5 5
`9 8
`4 4
`1 <1
`3 3
`
`1 <1
`4 4
`
`0
`
`2130
`
`2130
`
`25 33
`
`24 32
`
`11 15
`
`9 12
`811
`36 48
`
`23 33
`
`2231
`
`9 12
`
`1419
`2 3
`4 5
`1 1
`
`If a patient reported the same toxicity more than once that patient was counted only once
`to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 20
`According
`tBased on laboratory values 100 mgm2 n = 102 125 mgm2 n = 70
`Based on adverse
`
`event
`
`reports
`
`for that toxicity using the highest grade
`
`Figure 2A
`
`Treatment Related Toxicities
`
`by Age
`
`Figure 2B
`
`Treatment Related Toxicities
`
`by Age
`
`80
`
`60
`
`0
`
`201
`
`<65 Years n =86
`65 Years n = 20
`
`IT
`
`Fatigue
`
`Nausea
`
`Sensory
`
`Vomiting
`
`Diarrhea
`
`Neuropathy
`
`Grade 34
`Neutropenia
`
`80
`
`60
`
`2 40
`0
`
`20
`
`0
`
`<65 Years n = 56
`65 Years n = 19
`
`111011
`11111
`111111EN
`1111111111
`111111111111
`IL1LJLILJLJLJ
`
`Fa
`
`fig ue
`
`Na use
`
`Sensory
`
`Vomiting
`
`Diarrhea
`
`Neuropathy
`
`Grade 34
`NeJtropenia
`
`Albumin bound paclitaxel 100 mgm2 n = 106
`
`Albumin bound paclitaxel 125 mgm2 n = 75
`
`Discussion
`Results of the present study demonstrate that weekly albu
`minbound paclitaxel resulted in an objective response or SD for
`16 weeks in 31 of patients with MBC that had been previ
`ously treated with taxanes Women with SD maintained at 16
`to those who achieved an objec
`weeks had survival equivalent
`tive response P = 71 and therefore likely derived benefit
`the OS in the
`from albumin bound paclitaxel We evaluated
`patients with SD because it has been previously demonstrated
`that among patients with heavily capecitabinepretreated
`MBC survival rates are similar between responders and those
`patients who had SD that was a median of 4 months in dura
`tion8 Although the antitumor activity of weekly albumin
`
`bound paclitaxel at 100 mgm2 in patients who had received
`weekly paclitaxel was limited a substantial number of women
`up to 35 had benefit after progressing on weekly docetaxel
`and a few patients even had benefit after progressing despite
`weekly paclitaxel and weekly docetaxel as shown in Table 2
`Therefore albuminbound paclitaxel does not demonstrate
`cross resistance with solvent based paclitaxel and docetaxel
`even in heavily pretreated patients
`Treatment with weekly albumin bound paclitaxel had
`a favorable safety profile with an anticipated dose related
`The most
`increase in peripheral
`neuropathy
`events
`reported treatment related adverse
`in this study
`fatigue nausea and alopecia were
`
`sensory neuropathy
`
`frequently
`
`Clinical Breast Cancer December 2007
`
`855
`
`

`

`Albumin Bound Paclitaxel
`
`for TaxanePretreated MBC
`
`generally mild and readily managed Febrile neutropenia
`nail changes and fluid retention were uncommon
`and no
`reactions occurred In contrast
`to another
`hypersensitivity
`
`study which demonstrated a 23 incidence of grade 3 sen
`sory neuropathy with solvent based paclitaxel at 80 mgm2
`weekly the incidence rate in the present study using a
`higher dose 100 mgm2 weekly was only 8 in patients
`
`with taxanepretreated
`The
`use of albumin as the vehicle in albuminbound
`
`disease5
`
`castor oil
`
`the vehicle
`
`instead of polyoxyethylated
`paclitaxel
`in solvent based paclitaxel avoids
`the solvent associated
`the paclitaxel dose that can be adminis
`toxicities that limit
`tered safely In a randomized phase III study albuminbound
`paclitaxel was given at a paclitaxel
`dose approximately
`49 higher
`than solvent based paclitaxel and did not cause
`toxicity4 Consistent with these
`findings the
`significant
`maximum tolerated doses of albumin bound paclitaxel were
`100 mgm2 and 150 mgm2 administered weekly for 3 weeks
`followed by a week off treatment for heavily and minimally
`
`pretreated patients respectively9
`The decision
`to include an additional cohort of patients at
`a higher dosage ie 125 mgm2was based on the observation
`of minimal toxicity at the 100 mgm2 dose coupled with the
`principle that administration of a higher dosage should be
`
`explored safely in the interest of possible added antitumor
`
`activity In this interest a posthoc comparison of these cohorts
`in terms of response PFS and survival was warranted and
`between these
`differences were observed
`no meaningful
`cohorts in terms of demographics or other baseline character
`istics However an inherent
`limitation in this analysis stems
`from the lack of a prospective randomized design
`The ORRs
`for patients with disease heavily pretreated
`with albumin bound paclitaxel at 100 mgm2 and 125 mgm2
`weekly in this study were 14 and 16 respectively showing
`dose response relationship with weekly albumin
`no obvious
`bound paclitaxel
`in taxanepretreated disease These rates are
`comparable with the reported RRs for weekly paclitaxel
`in
`patients who received previous treatment with paclitaxel every
`3 weeks 16 7 of 45 patients10 and for docetaxel given every
`3 weeks 18 8 of 44 patients11 to patients with MBC that
`was resistant to paclitaxel However in patients with MBC that
`solvent based
`through previous taxane
`progressed
`therapy
`paclitaxel administered at 80 mgm2 was associated with a
`15 incidence of grade 34 neutropenia grade 3 10 grade 4
`510 and docetaxel administered at 100 mgm2 caused febrile
`neutropenia in 24 of patients11 The finding of a higher RR
`of albumin bound paclitaxel
`in patients whose disease was
`pretreated with docetaxel
`compared with those whose disease
`was pretreated with paclitaxel could be based in the differing
`mechanisms of actions between these 2 taxanes
`A recent phase II study compared albuminbound paclit
`axel 300 mgm2 administered every 3 weeks albuminbound
`paclitaxel 100 mgm2 and 150 mgm2 administered weekly and
`100 mgm2 administered every 3 weeks
`solvent based docetaxel
`as first line therapy in patients with MBC12 Weekly albumin
`
`856
`
`Clinical Breast Cancer December 2007
`
`bound paclitaxel demonstrated greater antitumor activity than
`docetaxel or albuminbound paclitaxel administered every 3
`weeks with no dose response relationship
`
`Conclusion
`In conclusion weekly administration of albumin bound
`paclitaxel 100 mgm2 has approximately the same antitumor
`activity as 125 mgm2 and a better safety profile in women
`with MBC that had progressed on previous taxane therapy In
`addition albumin bound paclitaxel 100 mgm2 weekly is well
`tolerated in pretreated patients with no hypersensitivity reac
`
`tions minimal myelosuppression and a low rate of treatment
`for peripheral neuropathy Weekly albumin bound
`cessation
`paclitaxel 100 mgm2 is a well tolerated regimen for women
`with MBC previously treated with taxanes In this setting
`obtaining prolonged SD for
`16 weeks appeared to provide the
`same clinical benefit as exhibiting an objective response This
`observation warrants further evaluation in larger trials
`
`Acknowledgements
`The authors acknowledge
`Sharyn Carrasco who served
`for this study and Susan A Thomas
`as the project manager
`ELS for writing assistance This study was sponsored by
`Abraxis BioScience Inc Los Angeles CA
`
`References
`1 Desai N Trieu V Yao Z et al Increased antitumor activity intra
`tumor paclitaxel concentrations
`and endothelial cell
`transport of
`albumin bound paclitaxel ABI007 compared with
`Cremophorfree
`Cremophorbased paclitaxel Clin Cancer Res 2006 12131724
`2 Taxol paclitaxel Injection prescribing information Princeton NJ
`BristolMyers Squibb 2003
`3 Ibrahim NK Samuels B Page R et al Multicenter phase II
`trial of
`ABI007 an albumin bound paclitaxel
`in women with metastatic
`breast cancer J Clin Oncol 2005 23601926
`4 Gradishar WJ Tjulandin S Davidson N et al Phase III
`of
`trial
`nanoparticle albumin bound paclitaxel compared with polyethylated
`in women with breast cancer J Clin
`castor oilbased paclitaxel
`Oncol 2005 237794803
`5 Seidman AD Berry D Cirrincione C et al CALGB 9840 phase III
`study of weekly W paclitaxel P via 1 hour h infusion versus stan
`dard S 3h infusion every third week in the treatment of metastatic
`breast cancer MBC with trastuzumab T for HER2 positive MBC
`and randomized for Tin HER2 normal MBC Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol
`2004 2214 suppl6s Abstract 512
`6 Green MC Buzdar AU Smith T et al Weekly paclitaxel
`improves patho
`logic complete remission in operable breast cancer when compared with
`once every 3 weeks J Clin Oncol 2005 23598392
`1 Arbuck SG Eisenhauer EA et al New guidelines to
`7 Therasse
`in solid tumors J Nati Cancer
`the response to treatment
`evaluate
`Inst 2000 9220516
`8 Blum JL Jones SE Buzdar AU et al Multicenter phase II study of
`in paclitaxelrefractory metastatic breast cancer J Clin
`capecitabine
`Oncol 1999 1748593
`9 Nyman DW Campbell KJ Hersh E et al Phase I and pharmaco
`kinetics trial of ABI007 a novel nanoparticle formulation of pacli
`in patients with advanced nonhematologic malignancies J Clin
`taxel
`Oncol 2005 23778593
`10 Perez EA Vogel CL Irwin DH et al Multicenter
`trial of
`phase II
`in women with metastatic breast cancer J Clin
`weekly paclitaxel
`Oncol 2001 19421623
`11 Valero V Jones SE Von Hoff DD et al A phase II study of docetaxel
`in patients with paclitaxelresistant metastatic breast cancer J Clin
`Oncol 1998 1633628
`12 Gradishar W Krasnojon D Cheporov
`S et al A randomized
`phase 2 trial of qw or q3w ABI007 ABX vs q3w solvent based
`docetaxel TXT as first
`line therapy in metastatic breast cancer
`MBC Presented at the 29th Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer
`Symposium December 17 2006 San Antonio TX Abstract 46
`
`paclitaxel
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket