`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS
`EQUIPMENT LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`AT&T INC., et al.,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS
`EQUIPMENT LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`SPRINT CORPORATION, et al.,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS
`EQUIPMENT LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`T-MOBILE USA, INC., et al.,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS
`EQUIPMENT LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`v.
`
`VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
`et al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 2:15-cv-00576
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 2:15-cv-00579
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 2:15-cv-00580
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 2:15-cv-00581
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO MOVE,
`ANSWER, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`Page 1
`
`CCE_EXHIBIT 2002
`
`
`
`Case 2:15-cv-00576-RWS-RSP Document 29 Filed 08/17/15 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 318
`
`
`HTC CORPORATION and HTC AMERICA, INC., (collectively, “HTC”), without
`
`
`
`waiving any defenses described or referred to in Fed. R. Civ. P. 12, move the Court to extend the
`
`time within which HTC is required to move, answer, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s
`
`Amended Complaint. In support of their Motion, HTC states as follows:
`
`1.
`
`On April 30, 2015, Plaintiff filed an Original Complaint naming HTC
`
`Corporation and HTC America Inc. as Defendants alleging infringement of United States Patent
`
`Nos. 8,457,022, 8,571,957 and 8,867,472.
`
`2.
`
`On July 22, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint naming HTC Corporation and
`
`HTC America Inc. as Defendants alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos. 8,457,022,
`
`8,570,957, 8,867,472, 8,457,676, 9,025,590 and 9,078,262.
`
`3.
`
`Counsel for HTC will agree to accept service for HTC in exchange for an
`
`extension of time for HTC to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint until November 16, 2015. This
`
`extension will make service easier for the parties and eliminate the need for the formalities under
`
`Fed. R. Civ. P. 4.
`
`4.
`
`HTC’s agreement with Plaintiff should not be construed as a waiver of any other
`
`rights or defenses, including, for instance, HTC’s right to file counterclaims, affirmative
`
`defenses, or to otherwise challenge the validity of the subject patents. Plaintiff is unopposed to
`
`the relief sought in this motion.
`
`WHEREFORE, HTC respectfully requests that the time in which HTC is required to
`
`move, answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint for Patent Infringement be extended
`
`to and include November 16, 2015.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`Page 2
`
`
`
`Case 2:15-cv-00576-RWS-RSP Document 29 Filed 08/17/15 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 319
`
`Dated: August 17, 2015
`
`
`
`/s/ Steven A. Moore
`Steven A. Moore
`steve.moore@pillsburylaw.com
`California SBN 232114
`Callie A. Bjurstrom
`callie.bjurstrom@pillsburylaw.com
`California SBN 137816
`Nicole S. Cunningham
`nicole.cunningham@pillsburylaw.com
`California SBN 234390
`Richard W. Thill
`richard.thill@pillsburylaw.com
`California SBN 236409
`PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW
`PITTMAN LLP
`501 West Broadway, Suite 1100
`San Diego, CA 92101-3575
`(619) 234-5000
`(619) 236-1995 (fax)
`
`ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS
`HTC CORPORATION AND HTC AMERICA,
`INC.
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was filed
`
`electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5 on this 17th day of August, 2015. As of this
`date all counsel of record have consented to electronic service and are being served with a copy
`of this document through the Court’s CM/ECF system under Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A).
`
`/s/ Steven A. Moore
`Steven A. Moore
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`Page 3
`
`
`
`Case 2:15-cv-00576-RWS-RSP Document 29-1 Filed 08/17/15 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 320
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS
`EQUIPMENT LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`AT&T INC., et al.,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS
`EQUIPMENT LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`SPRINT CORPORATION, et al.,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS
`EQUIPMENT LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`T-MOBILE USA, INC., et al.,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 2:15-cv-00576
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 2:15-cv-00579
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 2:15-cv-00580
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 2:15-cv-00581
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS
`EQUIPMENT LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`v.
`
`VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
`et al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO MOVE,
`ANSWER, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`Page 4
`
`
`
`Case 2:15-cv-00576-RWS-RSP Document 29-1 Filed 08/17/15 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 321
`
`Before the Court is the unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Move, Answer or
`
`
`
`Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint as to Defendants HTC Corporation and
`
`HTC America, Inc. submitted by Plaintiff Cellular Communications Equipment LLC and
`
`Defendants HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc. (collectively, “HTC”).
`
`
`
`Pursuant to stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ordered that HTCs deadline to move,
`
`answer, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint is extended until November 16,
`
`2015.
`
`
`
`2
`
`Page 5
`
`