throbber
Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology 10(2): 139-146, 2002
`
`© 2002 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc., Philadelphia
`
`Differential Expression of the PTEN Tumor
`Suppressor Protein in Fetal and Adult
`Neuroendocrine Tissues and Tumors: Progressive
`Loss of PTEN Expression in Poorly Differentiated
`Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
`
`*'l'Luoquan Wang, M.D.,
`
`'l'Ana Ignat, M.s., and *'l'Constantine A. Axiotis, M.D.
`
`Genetic alteration and loss of expression of tumor suppressor
`gene PTEN has been found in carcinomas of the breast, pros-
`tate, and endometrium, as well as in gliomas. PTEN expression
`in neural crest/neuroendocrine (NC/NE) tissues and in neo-
`plasms has not been reported. This study examines PTEN ex-
`pression in embryonal, fetal, and adult tissues by immunohis-
`tochemistry. The authors found high PTEN expression in em-
`bryonal, fetal, and adult NC/NE tissues. The authors also study
`the PTEN expression in NC/NE neoplasms (N = 37), includ-
`ing 5 melanocytic nevi, 2 melanomas, 9 carcinoids, 2 moder-
`ately differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, 13 poorly dif-
`ferentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, 2 paragangliomas, 2
`pheochromocytomas, 2 medullary thyroid carcinomas, and 1
`neuroblastoma. All carcinoid tumors and melanocytic nevi
`showed moderate or strong immunostaining for PTEN. In con-
`trast, the majority of poorly differentiated neuroendocrine car-
`cinomas (7 of 13) were negative for PTEN (54%); the remain-
`der showed diminished reactivity. The two melanomas studied
`were also negative for PTEN immunostaining. The paragan-
`gliomas, pheochromocytomas, medullary thyroid carcinomas,
`and neuroblastoma all showed a strong PTEN stain. The au-
`thors postulate that PTEN is a differentiation marker for
`NC/NE tissue and tumors and that loss of PTEN expres-
`sion may represent an important step in the progression of
`NE tumors.
`Key Words: PTEN-tumor suppressor gene-
`Immunohistochemistry—Neuroendocrine—Carcinoid—
`Neuroendocrine carcinoma.
`
`AppliedImmurwhistochemistry & MolecularMarphology I0(2).-
`139-146, 2002.
`
`PTEN is a recently identified tumor suppressor gene
`mapped to chromosome TEN, having both lipid/tyrosine
`phosphatase activity and molecular homology to tensin
`(1,2). It is thought to play an important role in the fun-
`damental control of cell growth, death, adhesion, and
`migration (3-6). Transgenic mice, which harbor dis-
`
`From the *Department of Pathology, State University of New York,
`Brooklyn, New York; and TThe Kings County Hospital Center, Brook-
`lyn, New York.
`Address correspondence and reprint requests to Constantine A.
`Axiotis, M.D., State University of New York Health Science Center at
`Brooklyn, Box 25, 450 Clarkson Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11202-2098.
`
`rupted PTEN, manifest early embryonic lethality,
`whereas heterologous mice that carry the PTEN+/- gene
`spontaneously develop tumors in Variety of organs, sug-
`gesting a dual role in ontogenesis and tumor suppression
`(7). Gerrnline mutations of PTEN have been detected in
`three human autosomal dominant disorders, Cowden dis-
`ease, L’Herrnitte-Duclos disease, and Barmayan-Zonana
`syndrome, which share some similar features including
`the formation of multiple benign tumors and an increased
`susceptibility to malignancy development (8-12). A high
`incidence of PTEN mutations has also been observed in
`
`including glioma, endometrial, and
`several tumors,
`breast carcinomas (13-19). Furthermore, loss of PTEN
`protein expression is frequent in high-grade breast and
`prostate carcinomas, suggesting that the loss of PTEN is
`a late event in the progression of these tumors (20-22).
`Recently, Gimm et al.(23) found high PTEN expres-
`sion in fetal and adult central and peripheral nervous
`systems. These data prompted us to investigate, using
`immunohistochemical methods, PTEN protein expres-
`sion in fetal and adult neural crest/neuroendocrine
`
`(NC/NE) tissues. We observed that PTEN protein was
`expressed in the fetal and adult pituitary glands, pancre-
`atic islets, adrenal medulla, peripheral nerve plexuses,
`and skin melanocytes. We subsequently investigated
`PTEN expression in a variety of NE neoplasms and
`found that progressive loss of PTEN protein expression
`occurred in poorly differentiated tumors.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Tissues and Tumors
`
`The material studied comprised tissues from six em-
`bryos and fetuses (gestational age: 8, 11, 13, 17, 22, and
`25 weeks), two adults, and 37 NC/NE neoplasms (Table
`1) obtained from archival surgical and autopsy speci-
`mens in the Department of Pathology, Kings County
`Hospital Center, Brooklyn, New York. Blocks fixed in
`10% buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin were
`evaluated independently (by C.A.A. and L.W.) for ges-
`tational age, tissue type, and diagnosis. Immunostaining
`
`139
`
`
`
`West-Ward Pharm.
`
`Exhibit 1051
`Page 001
`
`

`

`140
`
`L. WANG ET AL.
`
`TABLE 1. Grade and semiquantitative scoring of PTEN
`Immunostain in NC tumors
`
`Case
`
`Diagnosis
`
`Staining
`intensity
`
`Positive cells
`(%)
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`29
`29
`30
`31
`32
`33
`34
`35
`36
`37
`
`Carcinoid, thymus
`Carcinoid, teratoma
`Carcinoid, colon
`Carcinoid, colon
`Carcinoid, colon
`Carcinoid, liver
`Carcinoid, mediastinum
`Carcinoid, appendix
`Carcinoid, small intestine
`MDNEC, kidney
`MDNEC, cen/ix
`PDNEC, endometrium
`PDNEC, gallbladder
`PDNEC, lung
`PDNEC, mediastinum
`PDNEC, lung
`PDNEC, lung
`PDNEC, lung
`PDNEC, cervix
`PDNEC, lung
`PDNEC, cervix
`PDNEC, lung
`PDNEC, cervix
`PDNEC, lung
`Pheochromacytoma
`Pheochromacytoma
`Paraganglioma
`Paraganglioma
`Medullary carcinoma, thyroid
`Medullary carcinoma, thyroid
`Neuroblastoma
`Melanocytic nevus, skin
`Melanocytic nevus, skin
`Melanocytic nevus, skin
`Melanocytic nevus, skin
`Melanocytic nevus, skin
`Melanoma, skin
`Melanoma, metastatic
`
`+++
`++
`+++
`+++
`+++
`+++
`++
`+++
`++
`++
`+
`++
`++
`++
`—
`+
`—
`—
`++
`—
`—
`—
`—
`+
`+++
`+++
`+++
`+++
`+++
`+++
`+++
`+++
`++
`+++
`++
`+++
`—
`—
`
`++++
`++++
`++++
`++++
`++++
`++++
`++++
`++++
`++++
`+++
`++
`+
`++
`+++
`O
`++
`O
`O
`+
`0
`O
`O
`0
`++
`+++
`++++
`++++
`+++
`++++
`+++
`+++
`++++
`+++
`++++
`++++
`+++
`0
`0
`
`MDNEC, moderately differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma;
`PDNEC, poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma.
`
`was performed on 5-p. m sections from one or two rep-
`resentative areas. The diagnosis of neuroendocrine tu-
`mors was confirmed by synaptophysin and chromogran-
`in immunostaining. Immunostain for S-100 and HMB-45
`was performed on serial sections to confirm the recog-
`nition of olfactory cells, nerve plexuses, and melanocytes
`of skin, respectively.
`
`Classification of Neuroendocrine Tumors
`The neuroendocrine tumors were classified as carci-
`
`noid tumor, well-differentiated neuroendocrine carci-
`noma, moderately differentiated neuroendocrine carci-
`noma (MDNEC), and poorly differentiated neuroendo-
`crine carcinoma (PDNEC), according to Axiotis (24). A
`well-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma is equiva-
`lent to what the World Health Organization (1999) (25)
`classifies as an atypical carcinoid or to what Gould et al.
`(26) classifies as a well-differentiated neuroendocrine
`
`Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology, Vol. 10, No. 2, June 2002
`
`carcinoma grade I and II, and it is characterized by car-
`cinoidlike growth pattern with an apparent loss of archi-
`tectural organization (2 to 10 mitoses per high—power
`field and/or small foci of necrosis). Moderately differen-
`tiated neuroendocrine carcinoma is equivalent to atypical
`carcinoid (World Health Organization) or well-
`differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma grade III
`(Gould et al.), and is it characterized by a carcinoidlike
`growth pattern with cellular discohesion and a prominent
`loss of architectural organization, 211 mitoses per 10
`high—power fields, and conspicuous areas of central ne-
`crosis. PDNEC is equivalent to small cell/large cell neu-
`roendocrine carcinoma (World Health Organization) or
`small cell/intermediate neuroendocrine carcinoma
`
`(Gould et al.), and it is characterized by the loss of car-
`cinoidlike growth pattern, numerous mitosis, and geo-
`graphic necrosis. PDNEC can be small cell type, large
`cell type, or mixed small/large cell type.
`
`Reagents
`A murine monoclonal antibody (sc-7974; Santa Cruz
`Biotech, Santa Cruz, CA) that recognizes the last
`100 C—terminal amino acids of human PTEN
`
`protein was used in all immunohistochemical analyzes.
`The specificity of this antibody has been shown in pre-
`vious studies (21,27).
`
`Immunostaining
`Immunostaining was performed on a Ventana Nexes
`IHC staining system by using the Nexus Enhanced DAB
`detection kit Cat#760—003 (Ventana, Tuscon, AZ) ac-
`cording to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Depar-
`affinized, rehydrated 4—p.m sections briefly underwent
`microwave antigen retrieval by using Antigen Retrieval
`Citra solution (BioGenex, San Ramone, CA). The pri-
`mary antibody against PTEN protein (1:50 dilution) was
`incubated at 37°C for 32 minutes. The melanin pigments
`from nevus, skin, or melanoma tissue sections were re-
`moved by standard treatment with 10% hydrogen perox-
`ide for 24-48 hours before histochemical immunostain-
`
`ing (28).
`
`Antigen retrieval
`Antigen retrieval techniques have dramatically im-
`proved the staining quality of archival tissue sections
`(29). An immunohistochemical study of PTEN protein
`expression in prostate carcinoma that used antigen re-
`trieval techniques by heating tissue sections at 100°C for
`10 minutes in a pH 6.0—citIate buffer in archival paraffin-
`embedded tissue sections has been successful (22). We
`optimized antigen retrieval conditions with a variety of
`formalin—fixed, paraffin—embedded archival tissues by
`heating tissue sections at 100°C for 5 minutes in a com-
`mercial citrate solution. A comparable staining intensity
`was achieved by using a commercial immunostaining kit
`and an automatic stainer.
`
`
`
`West-Ward Pharm.
`
`Exhibit 1051
`Page 002
`
`

`

`PTEN TUMOR SUPPRESSOR PROTEIN EXPRESSION
`
`I41
`
`Controls
`
`Parallel sections incubated with PTEN-blocking
`peptide/PTEN antibody mixture determined the specific-
`ity of PTEN protein immunostaining. In detail, the anti-
`body against PTEN protein was preincubated with ex-
`cess PTEN-blocking peptide (Santa Cruz Biotech) and
`parallel slides were stained. Sections were also incubated
`with the immunoglobulin fraction of normal mouse se-
`rum (in place of the primary antibody) in the same pro-
`tein concentration as the primary antibody.
`
`Quantitation
`Cases with staining in more than 10% of cells were
`considered to have a positive result. PTEN immunostain-
`ing was serniquantitatively expressed as percentage of
`tumor cells stained <l0% (0), <25% (1+), <50% (2+),
`<75% (3+), >75% (4+); and intensity of immunostaining
`as weak staining (l+), moderate staining (2+), strong
`staining (3+).
`
`RESULTS
`
`Specificity of PTEN Protein Immunostaining
`Sections incubated with the anti—PTEN protein anti-
`body all showed diffuse, granular cytoplasmic immuno-
`staining with positive reactivity, except for a case of
`PDNEC that showed weak staining in both cytoplasm
`and nuclei. The parallel sections incubated with the anti-
`P'I‘EN/PTEN—blocking peptide mixture or the normal
`mouse serum did not show a reaction product (Fig. 1).
`
`PTEN Immunoreactivity in Fetal and Adult Tissues
`The strongest overall PTEN protein immunoreactivity
`was observed in the central and peripheral nervous sys-
`tems and in NC/NE tissues. The embryonal, fetal, and
`adult pituitary glands; pancreatic islets; the adrenal me-
`dulla; slcin melanocytes; the myenteric and mucosal gan-
`glia of gut; and the paravertebral ganglia stained strongly
`for PTEN protein (Figs. 2 and 3C). The nerve branches
`and twigs in peripheral organs and tissues were also
`strongly positive for PTEN.
`PTEN immunostaining in central nervous system
`(CNS) tissue showed differential expression during hu-
`man development. In early embryos, the CNS, including
`the retinal epithelium and primitive nasal olfactory cells,
`was diffusely and strongly positive for PTEN. Overall,
`the staining intensity decreases when the fetal CNS ma-
`tures. Adult brain and spinal cord tissues showed weakly
`positive staining for PTEN in both astrocytes and
`neurons (Fig. 3).
`In general, PTEN immunostaining results were nega-
`tive or weak in most nonneural tissues. Blood vessels
`
`were the only nonneural/neuroendocrine tissue that
`showed differential staining for PTEN product. In early
`fetal development,
`the aorta and small-vessel wall
`
`muscles tested positive for PTEN protein, whereas the
`adult aorta, medium-size muscular arteries, and small
`vessels and capillaries lost PTEN protein expression.
`Adult thyroid glands, breast tissue, basal layers of skin,
`the esophagus, and the prostate show focal and weak
`PTEN protein staining.
`
`PTEN Protein Immunoreactivity in NCINE Tumors
`The 37 NC/NE tumors listed in Table 1 were evalu-
`
`ated for PTEN protein immunoreactivity. Figures 4 and 5
`are representations of the results obtained. All carcinoid
`tumors, melanocytic nevi, paragangliomas, pheochromo-
`cytomas, medullary thyroid carcinomas, and neuroblas-
`tomas showed moderate or strong immunostaining for
`PTEN protein, and a majority of the tumor cells
`had positive results (>75%). However, 7 of 13 (54%)
`PDNECs were negative for PTEN immunostaining; the
`remaining PDNECs partially lost PTEN expression.
`Moderately differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas
`showed a weak or a moderate PTEN protein stain.
`The two melanomas examined were also negative for
`PTEN product.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`The present immunohistochemical data show 1) dif-
`ferential PTEN expression during CNS development; 2)
`marked PTEN expression in both fetal and adult NC/NE
`tissues; and 3) differential PTEN expression in well-
`differentiated NE tumors and poorly differentiated NE
`tumors. Because PTEN is not a structural protein, we
`believe that its expression is important for the differen-
`tiation of CNS and NC/NE tissues. PTEN inactivation in
`
`a transgenic mouse model results in early embryonic
`lethality. PTEN+/- and Chimeric mice showed suscepti-
`bility to subsequent tumor development, suggesting a
`dual role in both ontogenic development and tumor sup-
`pression (7). However, the formation and development
`of CNS and NC/NE tissues were not specifically exam-
`ined in this PTEN knockout animal model. It would be
`
`reasonable to speculate that the development of the ner-
`vous and vascular systems is mostly likely affected be-
`cause of the high PTEN expression in these two systems.
`In addition, Cowden’s disease, L’Hermitte—Duclos dis-
`ease, and Barmayan-Zonana syndrome are characterized
`by developmental defects such as vascular malforma-
`tions and features such as dysplastic gangliocytoma of
`the cerebellum and mental retardation, further suggesting
`that PTEN plays a role in both neural and vascular
`development (10-12).
`Molecular characterization of PTEN product has
`shown a high degree of homology to lipid/protein tyro-
`sine phosphatases and tensin (1,30). The lipid phospha-
`tase activity of PTEN product is related to the inhibition
`of cell cycle progression and G1 arrest through regula-
`tion of the PI3K/Akt pathway (31). Akt also is one of the
`
`
`
`Applied Immunohistochemirtry & Molecular Morphology, Vol. 10, Na. 2, June 2002
`
`West-Ward Pharm.
`
`Exhibit 1051
`Page 003
`
`

`

`142
`
`L. WANG ET AL.
`
`" .:-_
`~'.
`"-_ ' .,$s.'f¢'-
`
`FIG. 1. A: Carcinoid incubated with anti-PTEN monoclonal an-
`tibody shows strong PTEN reactivity. B: The parallel section
`incubated with anti-PTEN antibody/blocking peptide mixture
`shows specific blocking of PTEN immunoreactivity.
`
`FIG. 2. A: Pancreatic islet. B: Ad-
`enohypophysis. C: Nerve plexus of
`the intestine. D: Olfactory cells of na-
`sal mucosa. E: Adrenal medulla. F:
`Skin melanocytes. All show PTEN im-
`
`.;u-
`
`munoreactivity.
`show weak PTEN staining.
`
`-'
`" "
`
`.
`
`'
`
`-
`-_;
`
`.
`
`'
`'
`
`-
`
`FIG. 3. A and 0: Embryonic brain and spi-
`nal cord cells (11-week gestational age)
`show strong PTEN immunoreactivity. B
`and D: Adult brain and spinal cord cells
`
`Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology, Vol. 10, No. 2, June 2002
`
`Copyright © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
`West-Ward Pharm.
`Exhibit 1051
`Page 004
`
`West-Ward Pharm.
`
`Exhibit 1051
`Page 004
`
`

`

`PTEN TUMOR SUPPRESSOR PROTEIN EXPRESSION
`
`I43
`
`§.'-3.‘ 3‘
`
`_£;‘_._..,
`.
`H59._..
` 1:»
`
`'
`
`"
`
`;“l,{:3}-
`P"-&2.:---I-:'
`
`O
`
`FIG. 4. Positive PTEN immunostaining. A: Neuroblastoma. B: Pheochromocytoma. C: Paraganglioma. D: Melanocytic
`nevus. E: Thyroid medullary carcinoma.
`
`58
`
`_:
`
`
`
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`ity. B: Moderately differentiated neuroendocrine carci-
`noma shows moderate PTEN immunoreactivity. C: Poorly
`differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma shows weak fo-
`cal PTEN immunoreactivity.
`
`key regulatory molecules involved in the protection of
`cells against apoptosis (32-34). Tensin binds actin fila-
`ments at focal cellular adhesions,
`integrin-containing
`complexes, focal adhesion kinase, and growth factor re-
`ceptors, all of which have been implicated in cell growth
`regulation, cell mobility, cell—stromal interaction, and an-
`giogenesis (30,35). Because these events are key ele-
`ments in both tissue developmental differentiation and
`tumorigenesis, it is not surprising that the highly homolo-
`gous PTEN protein molecule may play a dual role in
`both human development and tumor suppression. Actu-
`ally, a similar characteristic has been found recently in
`another important molecule for the development of neu-
`ral crest derivatives, which is encoded by c-ret proto-
`oncogene (36). It belongs to the membrane receptors of
`the protein tyrosine kinase family and is expressed dur-
`ing mouse development in a number of tissues, including
`neural crest derivatives such as dorsal root ganglia, sym-
`pathetic and enteric ganglia, and neuroretinal and migrat-
`ing neural crest cells at earlier stages (37). High levels of
`c-ret transcripts have been found in pheochromocytomas
`and medullary thyroid carcinomas, which may be asso-
`ciated with a syndrome called multiple endocrine neo-
`plasia (38). The involvement of c-ret in these tumors has
`been supported by the identification of mutations in the
`ret gene. These mutations probably generate dominant
`tyrosine kinase—activated receptors. Mutations of c-ret
`have also been found in patients with Hirschsprung’s
`disease, which results from a congenital deficiency in the
`innervation of the posterior gut (39). The nature of the
`t ti
`. diff
`t.
`dr
`d. H.
`h
`mu 3 ‘ms 15
`ere” 1“ cancer Syn Omes an 1“
`“Sc '
`Sphlhg diseases ih Which deletions ih the Tet gehe Suggest
`a loss of function.
`
`Copyright © Lippiricott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
`West-Ward Pharm.
`Exhibit 1051
`Page 005
`
`Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology, Vol. 10, Na. 2, June 2002
`
`West-Ward Pharm.
`
`Exhibit 1051
`Page 005
`
`

`

`144
`
`L. WANG ET AL.
`
`PTEN is highly expressed in peripheral nerve ganglia,
`adrenal medulla, pancreatic islets, pituitary glands, and
`melanocytes. PTEN staining was not detected in the gas-
`trointestinal and respiratory diffuse neuroendocrine sys-
`tem. The ontogeny of the diffuse neuroendocrine system
`is still controversial (24). Some studies favor its deriva-
`tion from endoderrnal stem cells, whereas others support
`the theory of migration from the neural crest. The NC
`stem cells have broad potential in the formation of dif-
`ferent tissues, from cartilage to melanocytes. The step-
`wise restrictions of pluripotent progenitors may result
`from the expressional regulation of different genes (40,
`41). Therefore, it is not surprising that the NC-derived
`cells do not express PTEN equally, just as chromogranin
`and synaptophysin are expressed in most NE organs but
`not in melanocytes (42). In addition, we found no PTEN
`immunostaining in either the parathyroid gland or its
`adenoma. The classification of the parathyroid gland as a
`NE organ has been questioned, although positive immu-
`nostaining for synaptophysin has been reported (43).
`The regulation of PTEN expression was not well un-
`derstood until recently when a p53-binding element up-
`stream of the PTEN gene was identified (44). Deletion
`and mutation analyzes showed that this element is nec-
`essary for inducible transactivation of PTEN by p53. As
`a tumor suppressor, p53 also plays a role in the regula-
`tion of cell proliferation and apoptosis. It would be in-
`teresting to know how these two tumor suppressors in-
`teract in the regulation of cell proliferation and death. A
`p53—independent element controlling constitutive expres-
`sion of PTEN was also identified, indicating the com-
`plexity of PTEN expression regulation (44).
`PTEN is highly expressed in benign and low-grade NE
`tumors. However, most PDNECs completely lack or par-
`tially lose PTEN expression. Loss of PTEN expression is
`also commonly seen in high-grade prostate and breast
`carcinomas. PTEN expression is even elevated in benign
`and low-grade tumors of the prostate and the breast, such
`as prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and breast fibroad-
`enoma (20,2l,27,45,46). Similarly, the genetic alteration
`of PTEN is frequent in high-grade glioma but not in
`low-grade glioma (14,47). These data suggest that loss of
`the tumor suppressor PTEN product expression is a late
`event in the progression of these types of tumor. Because
`the PTEN product functions as a tumor suppressor, loss
`of or reduction of expression in NE tumors may be a
`meaningful prognostic marker. Noticeably, the mutation
`of another tumor suppressor gene, p53, is also considered
`a late event in most types of carcinoma (48,49). Tumor
`suppressor genes, such as p53 and the retinoblastoma
`gene product, have been found in NE neoplasms. The
`p53 gene is progressively overexpressed in well-
`differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma to PDNEC,
`whereas the retinoblastoma gene is inactivated only in
`PDNEC (50,51). It is also noted that PTEN is highly
`
`Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology, Vol. 10, N0. 2, June 2002
`
`expressed in nevus, whereas its expression in two cases
`of melanoma is lost.
`
`The consistent high expression of PTEN protein in
`fetal and adult NC/NE tissues and in differentiated
`NC/NE tumors indicates that PTEN is a NC/NE differ-
`
`entiation marker. PTEN product expression was partially
`or completely lost in PDNEC. It is noted that some
`PDNEC only show weak, focal, or even negative immu-
`nostain for synaptophysin and/or chromogranin, the two
`most commonly used NE differentiation markers. We
`saw two cases of PDNEC that were negative for synap-
`tophysin stain and showed stronger staining for PTEN
`than for chromogranin. Therefore, we propose P'I‘EN
`protein immunostain can be used as an adjunct immuno-
`histochemical marker in the diagnosis of NC/NE tumors.
`PDNECs are among the most aggressive human neo-
`plasms. Patients often have a dismal prognosis, and a
`better treatment regimen is certainly desired. PTEN lipid
`phosphatase activity acts to break cell cycle progression
`by inhibiting the PI3K pathway (52-54). Activated forms
`of proto-oncogene Akt were capable of overriding a
`PTEN-mediated cell cycle block, raising the possibility
`that Akt might be an important downstream target of
`PTEN with respect to cell cycle progression (33,55). It
`has also been shown that cell lines and tumors in which
`
`PTEN is lost have elevated levels of activated Akt (56-
`59). Thus, the loss of immunohistochemical detection of
`PTEN might predict the presence of activated Akt and, in
`turn, might become useful as a factor predicting success
`of therapies directed against this pathway. We also pro-
`pose that PTEN may be used as a pharmacodiagnostic
`and prognostic marker.
`Although we did not assess the genetic status of PTEN
`in NE neoplasms, the loss of PTEN protein expression,
`as assessed by immunohistochemistry, may reflect the
`majority of the possible mechanisms that result in PTEN
`inactivation. These would include direct inactivation by
`homozygous deletion, nonsense mutation, certain inter-
`nal deletions, and promotor methylation, or indirect in-
`activation such as loss of a PTEN-directed transcription
`factor or posttranscriptional modification. Some mis-
`sense mutations, which do not grossly destabilize the
`protein product, would not be accounted for by immu-
`nohistochemistry. Therefore, we believe immunohisto-
`chemistry is the optimal method for evaluating the func-
`tional status of PTEN because it would detect a loss of
`
`PTEN function induced by a majority of the mechanisms
`through which gene products are inactivated.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. Li J, Yen C, Liaw D, et al. PTEN, a putative protein tyrosine
`phosphatase gene mutated in human brain, breast, and prostate
`cancer [see comments]. Science 1997;275:l943—7.
`2. Steck PA, Pershouse MA, Jasser SA, et al. Identification of a
`candidate tumor suppressor gene, MMACl, at chromosome
`
`
`
`West-Ward Pharm.
`
`Exhibit 1051
`Page 006
`
`

`

`10q23.3 that is mutated in multiple advanced cancers. Nat Genet
`1997;15:356—62.
`. Huang H, Potter CJ, Tao W, et al. PTEN affects cell size, cell
`proliferation and apoptosis during Drosophila eye development.
`Development l999;l26:5365—72.
`. Lu Y, Lin YZ, LaPushin R, et al. The PTEN/MMAC1/TEP tumor
`suppressor gene decreases cell growth and induces apoptosis and
`anoikis in breast cancer cells. Oncogene 1999;18:7034—45.
`. Paramio JM, Navarro M, Segrelles C, et al. PTEN tumor suppres-
`sor is linked to the cell cycle control through the retinoblastoma
`protein. Oncogene 1999;18:7462—8.
`. Tian XX, Pang JC, To SS, et al. Restoration of wild-type PTEN
`expression leads to apoptosis, induces differentiation, and reduces
`telomerase activity in human glioma cells. J Neuropathol Exp Neu-
`rol 1999;58:472—9.
`. Di Cristofano A, Pesce B, Cordon-Cardo C, et al. PTEN is essen-
`tial for embryonic development and tumor suppression. Nat Genet
`1998;19:348-55.
`. Liaw D, Marsh DJ, Li J, et al. Gerrnline mutations of the PTEN
`gene in Cowden disease, an inherited breast and thyroid cancer
`syndrome. Nat Genet 1997;16:64-7.
`Marsh DJ, Dahia PL, Zheng 2, et al. Germline mutations in PTEN
`are present in Bannayan-Zonana syndrome [letter]. Nat Genet
`1997;16:333-4.
`Bannayan GA. Lipomatosis, angiomatosis, and macrencephalia. A
`previously undescribed congenital syndrome. Arch Pathol 1971;
`9221-5.
`Zonana J, Rimoin DL, Davis DC. Macrocephaly with multiple
`lipomas and hemangiomas. J Pediatr 1976;89:600—3.
`Eng C. Cowden syndrome and LHérmitte-Duclos disease in a fam-
`ily: a single genetic syndrome with pleiotropy. J Med Genet 1994;
`31:458-61.
`Matias-Guiu X, Catasus L, Bussaglia E, et al. Molecular pathology
`of endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma. Hum Pathol 2001;32:
`569-77.
`Davies MP, Gibbs FE, Halliwell N, et al. Mutation in the
`PTEN/MMAC1 gene in archival low grade and high grade glio-
`mas. Br J Cancer 1999;79:1542-8.
`Duerr EM, Rollbrocker B, Hayashi Y, et al. PTEN mutations in
`gliomas and glioneuronal tumors. Oncogene 1998;16:2259-64.
`Bussaglia E, del Rio E, Matias-Guiu X, et al. PTEN mutations in
`endometrial carcinomas: a molecular and clinicopathologic analy-
`sis of 38 cases. Hum Pathol 2000;31:312-7.
`Levine RL, Cargile CB, Blazes MS, et al. PTEN mutations and
`microsatellite instability in complex atypical hyperplasia, a precur-
`sor lesion to uterine endometrioid carcinoma. Cancer Res 1998;
`58:3254—8.
`Chen J, Lindblom P, Lindblom A. A study of the PTEN/MMAC1
`gene in 136 breast cancer families. Hum Genet 1998;102:124-5.
`Chen ST, Yu SY, Tsai M, et al. Mutation analysis of the putative
`tumor suppression gene PTEN/MMAC1 in sporadic breast cancer.
`Breast Cancer Res Treat l999;55:85-9.
`Whang YE, Wu X, Suzuki H, et al. Inactivation of the tumor
`suppressor PTENlMMAC1 in advanced human prostate cancer
`through loss of expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998;95:
`5246-50.
`Perren A, Weng LP, Boag AH, et al. Immunohistochemical evi-
`dence of loss of PTEN expression in primary ductal adenocarci-
`nonras of the breast. Am J Pathol 1999;155:1253-60.
`McMenamin ME, Soung P, Perera S, et al. Loss of PTEN expres-
`sion in paraffin-embedded primary prostate cancer correlates with
`high Gleason score and advanced stage. Cancer Res 1999;59:
`4291-6.
`Gimm O, Attie-Bitach T, Lees JA, et al. Expression of the PTEN
`tumor suppressor protein during human development. Hum Mol
`Genet 2000;9:1633-9.
`Axiotis CA. The neuroendocrine lung. In: Livolsi V, Asa A, eds.
`Endocrine Pathology. Philadelphia: Harcourt, 2002:261-296.
`World Health Organization. Histological typing of lung and pleural
`tumors. In: Sobin L, ed. International Histologic Classification of
`Tumors. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization;
`1999:1-156.
`Warren W, Memoli V, Gould V. Well differentiated and small cell
`
`PTEN TUMOR SUPPRESSOR PROTEIN EXPRESSION
`
`I45
`
`27.
`
`28.
`
`29.
`
`30.
`
`31.
`
`32.
`
`33.
`
`34.
`
`35.
`
`36.
`
`37.
`
`38.
`
`39.
`
`40.
`
`41.
`
`42.
`
`43.
`
`44.
`
`45.
`
`46.
`
`47.
`
`48.
`
`49.
`
`50.
`
`51.
`
`neuroendocrine carcinomas of the lung. Two related but distinct
`clinicopathologic entities. Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol 1988;55:
`299-3 10.
`Depowski P, Rosenthal S, Ross J. Loss of expression of the PTEN
`gene protein product is associated with poor outcome in breast
`cancer. Mod Pathol 2001;14:672-6.
`Putt FA. Manual ofHistopathologic Staining Methods. New York,
`John Wiley & Sons, 1972.
`Shi S, Gu J, Jurrens J, Cote R, Taylor C. Development of the
`antigen retrieval technique: Philosophical and theoretical bases. In:
`Shi S, Gu J, Taylor C, eds. Antigen retrieval techniques: Eaton
`Publishing, 2000:17-39.
`Chen H, Ishii A, Wong WK, Chen LB, Lo SH. Molecular charac-
`terization of human tensin. Biochem J 2000;351 Pt 2:403-11.
`Stambolic V, Suzuki A, de la Pompa JL, et al. Negative regulation
`of PKB/Akt-dependent cell survival by the tumor suppressor
`PTEN. Cell 1998;95:29-39.
`Davies MA, Koul D, Dhesi H, et al. Regulation of Akt/PKB ac-
`tivity, cellular growth, and apoptosis in prostate carcinoma cells by
`MMAC/PTEN. Cancer Res 1999;59:255l-6.
`Li J, Simpson L, Takahashi M, et al. The PTEN/MMAC1 tumor
`suppressor induces cell death that is rescued by the AKT/protein
`kinase B oncogene. Cancer Res 1998;58:5667-72.
`Yuan ZQ, Sun M, Feldman RI, et al. Frequent activation of AKT2
`and induction of apoptosis by inhibition of phosphoinositide-3-OH
`kinase/Akt pathway in human ovarian cancer. Oncogene 2000;19:
`2324-30.
`Soussi T. PTEN (MMAC, TEP-1): phosphatase and tensin homo-
`log deleted on chromosome 10. Bull Cancer 1999;86:715-6.
`Douarin NM, Dupin E, Ziller C. Genetic and epigenetic control in
`neural crest development. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1994;4:685-95.
`Pachnis V, Mankoo B, Costantini F. Expression of the c-net proto-
`oncogene during mouse embryogenesis. Development 1993:1192
`1005-17.
`Mulligan LM, Kwok JBJ, Healey CS, et al. Gerrn-line mutations of
`the RET proto-oncogene in multiple endocine neoplasia type 2A.
`Nature 1993;363:458-60.
`Edery P, Lyonnet S, Mulligan LM, et al. Mutations of the RET
`Proto-oncogene in Hirschsprung’s disease. Nature 1994;367:
`378-80.
`Bronner-Fraser M. Neural crest cell formation and migration in the
`developing embryo. FASEB J 1994;8:699-707.
`Vaglia J, Hall BK. Regulation of neural crest cell populations:
`occurrence, distribution and underlying mechanisms. Int J Dev
`Biol 1999;43:95-1 10.
`Gould VE, Wiedemann B, Lee I, et al. Synaptophysin expression
`in neuroendocrine neoplasms as determined by immunocytochem-
`istry. Am J Pathol 1986;126:243-57.
`Gould VE, Memoli V, Chejfec G, Johannessen IV. The APUD cell
`system and its neoplasms/Observation on the significance and
`limitations of the concept. Surg Clin North Am 1979;59:93-108.
`Stambolic V, MacPherson D, Sas D, et al. Regulation of PTEN
`transcription by p53. Mol Cell 2001;8:317-25.
`Bose S, Wang SI, Terry MB, et al. Allelic loss of chromosome
`10q23 is associated with tumor progression in breast carcinomas.
`Oncogene 1998;17:123—7.
`Garcia JM, Silva JM, Dominguez G, et al. Allelic loss of the P'TEN
`region (10q23) in breast carcinomas of poor patlrophenotype.
`Breast Cancer Res Treat 1999;57:237-43.
`Rasheed BK, Stenzel 'IT, McLendon RB, et al. PTEN gene muta-
`tions are seen in high-grade but not in low-grade gliomas. Cancer
`Res 1997;57:4187-90.
`Wang L, Yu Y, Sell S. P53 and PCNA as differentiation markers
`of hepatocellular carcinomas. J Tumor Marker Oneol 1998;13:
`5-13.
`Hillstein MC, Sidransky D, Harris CC. P53 mutations in human
`cancers. Science 1991;253:49—53.
`Barbareschi M, Girlando S, Mauri FA, et al. Tumor suppressor
`gene products, proliferation, and differentiation markers in lung
`neuroendocrine neoplasms. J Pathol 1992;166:343-50.
`Harbor JW, Lai SL, Whang-Peng J, et al. Abnormalities in struc-
`ture and expression of the human retinoblastoma gene in SCLC.
`Science 1997;241:353-7.
`
`Applied Imrnunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology, Vol. 10, No. 2, June 2002
`
`
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`12.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
`17.
`
`18.
`
`19.
`
`20.
`
`21.
`
`22.
`
`23.
`
`25.
`
`26.
`
`West-Ward Pharm.
`
`Exhibit 1051
`Page 007
`
`

`

`I46
`
`L. WANG ET AL.
`
`52.
`
`53.
`
`54.
`
`55.
`
`56.
`
`I-llobilkova A, Guldber

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket