throbber
Vol. 326 No. 8
`
`COMPARISON OF TREATMENTS FOR ISLET-CELL CARCINOMA — MOERTEL ET AL.
`
`519
`
`STREPTOZOCIN—DOXORUBICIN, STREPTOZOCIN—FLUOROURACIL, OR
`CHLOROZOTOCIN IN THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED ISLET-CELL CARCINOMA
`
`CHARLES G. MOERTEL, M.D., IVIYRTO LEFKOPOULO, Sc.D., STUART LIPSITZ, Sc.D., RICHARD G. HAHN, M.D.,
`AND DAVID KLAASSEN, M.D.
`
`Abstract Background. The combination of streptozo-
`cin and fluorouracil has become the standard therapy
`for advanced islet-cell carcinoma. However, doxorubicin
`has also been shown to be active against this type
`of tumor, as has chlorozotocin, a drug that
`is struc-
`turally similar to streptozocin but less frequently causes
`vomiting.
`In this multicenter trial, we randomly as-
`Methods.
`signed 105 patients with advanced islet-cell carcinoma to
`receive one of three treatment regimens: streptozocin plus
`fluorouracil, streptozocin plus doxorubicin, or chlorozoto-
`cin alone. The 31 patients in whom the disease did not
`respond to treatment were crossed over to chlorozotocin
`alone or to one of the combination regimens.
`Results. Streptozocin plus doxorubicin was superior
`to streptozocin plus lluorouracil in terms of the rate of tu-
`mor regression, measured objectively (69 percent vs. 45
`percent, P = 0.05), and the length of time to tumor pro-
`gression (median, 20 vs. 6.9 months; P = 0.001). Strepto-
`zocin plus doxorubicin also had a significant advantage in
`terms of survival (median, 2.2 vs. 1.4 years; P = 0.004)
`
`DVANCED carcinoma of the islet cells of the pan-
`creas, although rare, presents a kaleidoscope of
`clinical challenges. In addition to the usual problems
`associated with primary and metastatic tumor bulk,
`patients with islet-cell carcinoma may have evidence
`of a variety of hormonal excesses — sometimes sub-
`clinical, sometimes life-threatening. A special feature
`of islet-cell carcinomas, which should be weighed in
`any treatment decision, is the frequently indolent pro-
`gression of disease even after metastasis has occurred.
`Treatment options should always include judicious
`observation. The choice in cases of advanced disease
`
`is strongly influenced by the distribution and bulk
`of tumor, the aggressiveness of the disease, and the
`
`From the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. (C.G.M. , R.G.H.); the Dana-Farber
`Cancer Institute, Boston (M.L., S.L.); and the Cancer Control Agency of British
`Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (UK). Address reprint requests to Dr. Moertel at
`the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905,
`Performed for the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (D.C, Tonney, chair),
`Other participating institutions include Albany Medical College, Albany, N.Y.;
`Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, N.Y.; University of Califomia—
`Irvine, Orange; Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland: Chicago Medical
`School, Chicago; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia; Hahnemann Medical
`College, Philadelphia; Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Baltimore; Medical Col-
`lege of Ohio, Toledo; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; Mount Sinai Medi-
`cal Center, New York; New York University Medical Center, New York; Newark
`Beth Israel Medical Center. Newark, N..l.; Northwestern University Medical
`Center, Chicago; Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Binghamton, N.Y.; Hospital of
`the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; University of Pittsburgh, Pitts-
`burgh; University of Rochester Cancer Center, Rochester, N.Y.; Roswell Park
`Memorial Institute, Buffalo, N.Y.; Rush—Presbyterian—St. Luke’s Medical Cen-
`ter, Chicago; University of Pretoria, Pretoria. South Africa; the Swiss Group,
`Bern, Switzerland; Tufts—New England Medical Center Hospital. Boston; Nat-
`alie Warren Bryant Cancer Center, Tulsa, Okla.; and the University of Wisconsin
`Clinical Cancer Center, Madison.
`Supported in part by grants (CA 13650, CA 23318, CA 15947, CA 06594, CA
`14958, CA 14144, CA 18281, CA 13611, CA 16116, CA 20365, CA 17152.
`CA 16395, CA 17145. CA 15489, CA 11083, CA 12296, CA 25988, CA 21692,
`CA 07190. CA 21076, and CA 21115) from the National Cancer Institute.
`
`that was accentuated when we considered long-term sur-
`vival (>2 years). Chlorozotocin alone produced a 30 per-
`cent regression rate, with the length of time to tumor
`progression and the survival
`time equivalent to those
`observed with streptozocin plus lluorouracil. Crossover
`therapy after the failure of either chlorozotocin alone or
`one of the combination regimens produced an overall re-
`sponse rate of only 17 percent, and the responses were
`transient. Toxic reactions to all regimens included vomit-
`ing, which was least severe with chlorozotocin; hemato-
`logic depression; and, with long-term therapy, renal insuf-
`ficiency.
`Conclusions. The combination of streptozocin and
`doxorubicin is superior to the current standard regimen of
`streptozocin plus fluorouracil in the treatment of advanced
`islet-cell carcinoma. Chlorozotocin alone is similar in effi-
`cacy to streptozocin plus fluorouracil, but it produces lew-
`er gastrointestinal side effects than the regimens contain-
`ing streptozocin. It therefore merits study as a constituent
`of combination drug regimens.
`(N Engl J Med 1992;
`326:519-23.)
`
`nature and severity of the associated endocrine syn-
`dromes. The appropriate treatment may include sur-
`gical reduction of tumor bulk, hepatic-artery occlu-
`sion for disease that is predominantly in the liver,
`specific end-organ blockade for endocrine syndromes
`(e.g., omeprazole for gastrinoma), suppression of hor-
`mone production (e.g., octreotide for the vasoactive
`intestinal peptide syndrome), and usually last in line,
`systemic cytotoxic therapy.
`Streptozocin has been marketed specifically for the
`treatment of islet-cell carcinoma; it induces objective-
`ly measurable tumor regression in about one third of
`patients.‘ In an earlier study, our group found that a
`combination of fluorouracil with streptozocin pro-
`duced a significant improvement in response rate and
`a trend toward improved survival when compared
`with the use of streptozocin alone.’ We also found that
`doxorubicin was active in patients in whom previous
`chemotherapy had failed? These findings led to the
`consideration of a combination of doxorubicin and
`
`streptozocin as therapy for this type of cancer. A pilot
`study found that these agents could be combined safe-
`ly at essentially full doses of each (unpublished data).
`Chlorozotocin is a new drug that is structurally very
`similar to streptozocin; both contain a nitrosourea
`moiety. Its toxic effects include hematologic depres-
`sion, but with less nausea and vomiting than are asso-
`ciated with streptozocin.” It also has the practical
`advantage of being administered in a single intrave-
`nous dose during each course of treatment.
`The present study compared a combination of dox-
`orubicin and streptozocin with the more commonly
`used combination of fluorouracil and streptozocin in
`metastatic islet-cell cancer. We also compared the new
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`Downloaded Irom najm.org on June 21, 2016. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`Copyright © 1992 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`West-Ward Pharm.
`Exhibit 1023
`Page 001
`
`West-Ward Pharm.
`Exhibit 1023
`Page 001
`
`

`

`520
`
`THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
`
`Feb. 20, 1992
`
`agent chlorozotocin with the two streptozocin combi-
`nations.
`
`METHODS
`
`The patients enrolled in this trial were cared for at a number of
`different centers; the study was conducted by the Eastern Coopera-
`tive Oncology Group (ECOG). All those enrolled in the study had
`histologic proof of unresectable or metastatic islet-cell carcinoma.
`Tissue diagnosis was confirmed by pathological review. It was re-
`quired that each patient have a measurable indicator of response to
`therapy, which could include evidence of tumor on physical exami-
`nation or chest films or well-defined metastatic lesions in the liver on
`radioisotope or CT scanning, provided these lesions measured at
`least 5 cm at their widest point. Malignant hepatomegaly could be
`used as an indicator if there was a clearly palpable liver edge at least
`5 cm below the xiphoid process or the costal margins during quiet
`respiration. For patients without measurable tumor, laboratory as-
`says demonstrating excessive hormone production could be accept-
`ed as the only indicators of response. This was the case for only
`seven patients. The criteria for exclusion were an ECOG perform-
`ance score of 4 (indicating total disability), severe nutritional im-
`pairment, recent major surgery (within three weeks), previous ther-
`apy with any of the study agents, any chemotherapy or radiation
`therapy within the previous month, active infection, a leukocyte
`count <4><l0” per liter or a platelet count <l50><|09 per liter,
`active heart disease, a serum creatinine level >l32.6 mmol per liter
`(1.5 mg per deciliter) or a blood urea nitrogen level >l0.7 mmol per
`liter (30 mg per deciliter), or any elevation of serum bilirubin.
`Patients were also excluded if they had any other concurrent or
`recent malignant disease except cutaneous epitheliomas or cervical
`carcinoma in situ.
`
`Randomization Procedures
`
`Patients were stratified according to ECOG performance score
`and according to whether their indicator of response was measur-
`able tumor or endocrine abnormalities on laboratory assays. They
`were then randomly assigned to therapy with chlorozotocin alone,
`fluorouracil plus streptozocin, or doxorubicin plus streptozocin.
`If the initially assigned treatment
`failed,
`the patients treated
`with chlorozotocin alone were randomly assigned to receive either
`lluorouracil plus streptozocin or doxorubicin plus streptozocin.
`Those originally assigned to a streptozocin regimen received chloro-
`zotocm.
`
`Treatment
`
`Chlorozotocin was given in a single intravenous injection (l50 mg
`per square meter of body—surface area), repeated every seven weeks.
`For the combination regimens, streptozocin was given by intrave-
`nous injection at a dose of 500 mg per square meter per day for live
`consecutive days, repeated every six weeks. Fluorouracil was given
`by intravenous injection at a dose of 4-00 mg per square meter per
`day for five days concurrently with streptozocin. Doxorubicin was
`given along with streptozocin by intravenous injection at a dose of
`50 mg per square meter on days I and 22 of each six-week treatment
`cycle, with a maximal total dose of 500 mg per square meter. Leuko-
`cyte and platelet counts were obtained weekly; serum creatinine
`measurements and urinalyses were performed before each cycle of
`therapy. Dosages were reduced if patients had severe nausea or
`vomiting, stomatitis, diarrhea, leukopenia, or thrombocytopenia. If
`the creatinine level became elevated or persistent proteinuria devel-
`oped, the dose of streptozocin or chlorozotocin was reduced. If
`these abnormalities persisted, treatment with these agents was dis-
`continued. Therapy was continued until disease progression was
`noted.
`
`Evaluation of Response
`
`Patients treated with the drug combinations were reevaluated
`every six weeks, and those treated with chlorozotocin were reevalu-
`ated every seven weeks. Measurable tumor masses were considered
`to have regressed if the product of perpendicular diameters was
`
`reduced by at least 50 percent. For malignant hepatomegaly, regres-
`sion was defined as a reduction of at least 30 percent in the sum of
`the measurements below the xiphoid process and the costal mar-
`gins. For hormonal assays, it was defined as a reduction of at least
`50 percent in pretreatment abnormalities. If both tumor size and
`endocrine abnormalities were used as indicators, the response to
`treatment was determined on the basis of measurable tumor. Dis-
`ease progression was defined as an increase of at least 25 percent in
`tumor measurements or the detection of new areas of malignant
`disease.
`
`Statistical Analysis
`
`Analysis of disease progression and survival was based on a pro-
`portional-hazards multivariate model, used to evaluate the rela-
`tion of differences among treatment groups to characteristics of
`the patients and the disease.” Analyses of differences in rates of re-
`gression were modeled by multivariate linear logistic regression.7
`Unadjusted medians for the lengths of time to various events
`were estimated from Kaplan—Meier life-table curves,” and differ-
`ences in time distributions that were not adjusted for patients’
`characteristics were evaluated with the log-rank test.“ For the com-
`parison of rates of toxicity and response to treatment, we used
`the Kruskal—Wallis exact test for ordered contingency tables.'""'
`For comparisons of patients‘ characteristics we used the RXC
`contingency—table exact
`test, which is similar to Fisher’s exact
`test.” Only P values of less than 0.10 are reported. All tests were
`two—sided.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Between November 1978 and June I985, 125 pa-
`tients were enrolled in this study. Eighteen patients
`were subsequently found to be ineligible (eight ran-
`domly assigned to receive chlorozotocin, seven to re-
`ceive fluorouracil plus streptozocin, and three to re-
`ceive doxorubicin plus streptozocin). An additional
`two patients withdrew from the study. Up-to-date fol-
`low-up information was availableron all the remaining
`105 patients, except 1 who was lost to follow-up after
`eight years. As Table 1 shows, the characteristics of
`the patients who could be evaluated were reasonably
`well balanced among the treatment groups.
`Results of Treatment
`
`Among the 105 eligible patients who underwent
`treatment, 3 did not have serial measurements ade-
`quate to determine their response. Results for the re-
`maining 102 are shown in Figure l. The overall differ-
`ences in rates of regression among treatment groups
`are highly significant (P = 0.005). The doxorubicin—
`streptozocin group had significantly higher rates of
`regression than either the fluorouracil—streptozocin
`group (P = 0.05) or the chlorozotocin group (P =
`0.002). The median durations of regression, measured
`from the start of therapy to the last observation
`of regression, were 17 months for chlorozotocin, 14
`months for fluorouracil plus streptozocin, and 18
`months for doxorubicin plus streptozocin. By an alter-
`native measurement, from the first observation of re-
`gression to relapse, the median durations of regression
`were 21 months, 13 months, and 22 months, respec-
`tively. There was a larger number of patients with
`very long regressions (lasting two or more years) in the
`doxorubicin—streptozocin group (ll patients, vs. 4-" in
`the chlorozotocin group and 2 in the fluorouracil-
`
`West-Ward Pharm.
`Exhibit 1023
`Page 002
`
`West-Ward Pharm.
`Exhibit 1023
`Page 002
`
`

`

`Vol. 326 No. 8
`
`COMPARISON OF TREATMENTS FOR ISLET-CELL CARCINOMA — MOERTEL ET AL.
`
`streptozocin group). Six patients treated with doxoru-
`bicin plus streptozocin (17 percent) had regressions
`that persisted for more than four years, the longest of
`which lasted seven years and nine months.
`Table 2 shows the relation of tumor regression to
`patient characteristics. Regression rates were higher
`for middle-aged patients (40 to 60 years of age), but
`this difference was only of borderline significance.
`There was no strong evidence that any specific type of
`endocrine abnormality made a patient either more re-
`sponsive or more resistant to chemotherapy; the num-
`bers were small, however.
`Figure 2 shows the length of time to tumor pro-
`gression. Doxorubicin plus streptozocin had a strong
`
`Table 1. Characteristics of the Study Patients.
`DOXORUBICIN +
`FLUOROURACIL +
`STREPTOZOCIN
`STREPTOZOCIN
`
`CHLOROZOTOCIN
`
`CHARACTERISTIC
`
`Sex (M/F)
`Median age — yr (range)
`Time from diagnosis
`<3 mo
`3—<l2 mo
`>12 mo
`ECOG perfonnance score
`0-1
`2-3
`Endocrine abnormality‘l'
`Gastrin
`S—HIAA
`Hypercalcemia
`Insulin
`Corticotropin
`VIP
`Glucagon
`None recorded
`Indicator of response
`Tumor size
`Honnone assay
`Both
`
`13/20
`57 (25-80)
`
`20/14
`51 (18-78)
`
`22
`6
`6
`
`
`
`>—--—v—-IQ~n——-t>—-—-oc-
`
`18/20
`53 (16-75)
`19
`14
`5
`
`27
`11
`
`Btu-—-—-tow-—-:
`
`18
`2
`13
`
`no
`no16
`
`i3wG
`“The ECOG score is on a scale from 0 (fully active) to 4 (totally disabled).
`l'Nine patients had more than one endocrine-function abnonnality. 5-HIAA denotes
`5-ltydroxyindoleacetic acid. and VIP vasoactive intestinal peptide.
`
`advantage in these terms over the other regimens
`(P = 0.001 for both comparisons), and this advantage
`was sustained over six years of observation. The
`P values remained unchanged after multivariate Cox
`regression analysis.
`Survival times are compared in Figure 3. The chlor-
`ozotocin and fluorouracil—streptozocin groups had
`essentially the same survival times (median survival,
`1.5 and 1.4 years). The patients who received doxoru-
`bicin plus streptozocin, however, had decidedly longer
`survival
`(median, 2.2 years);
`this survival advan-
`tage was even more striking in the long-term follow-
`up data. Table 3 shows survival
`in relation to a
`number of patient characteristics. Statistically sig-
`nificant predictors of survival included the ECOG
`performance score and age. The age effect was quad-
`ratic — i.e., patients from 40 to 60 years of age
`had longer survival
`times than older or younger
`patients. Survival differences among the treatment
`groups remained significant after adjustment for im-
`
`Chlorozotocin
`(n = 33}
`
`Fluorouracil + Strep-
`tozocin (n = 33)
`
`Doxorubicin + Strep-
`tozocin (n = 38)
`
`0
`
`10
`
`20
`
`so
`
`40
`
`so
`
`60
`
`in 30
`
`Patients with Regression (96)
`
`Figure 1. Rates of Tumor Regression, Measured Objectively, Ac-
`cording to Treatment Group.
`
`balances in these prognostic factors by the Cox regres-
`sion analysis;
`that is,
`the doxorubicin—streptozocin
`regimen continued to be superior to the other two regi-
`mens in terms of survival (P<0.01 for both compari-
`sons).
`Thirty-one patients were crossed over to alternative
`therapy after their originally assigned treatment failed
`to induce regression. One of these did not have se-
`rial measurements adequate to determine response.
`Only 2 of 15 patients who could be evaluated had a
`regression with chlorozotocin after the previous fail-
`ure of a streptozocin regimen; the same was true for
`only 3 of 15 patients who received a streptozocin regi-
`men as secondary treatment. Regressions during sec-
`ondary treatment were transient, persisting for a
`median of less than six months. The median inter-
`
`to disease progression for all patients receiving
`val
`secondary therapy was 4- months, and the median
`>
`
`Table 2. Response to Therapy According to Pa-
`tienls’ Characteristics.*
`No. WITH
`OBJECTIVE
`No. or
`PATIENTS REGllESSION(%)
`
`PVALUE
`
`CHARACTERISTIC
`Sex
`Male
`Female
`Age (yr)
`$40
`>40—60
`>60
`Time from diagnosis
`<3 mo
`3—<l2 mo
`212 mo
`ECOG performance score
`0-1
`2-3
`Endocrine abnorrnalityi’
`Yes
`No
`Specific abnormality
`Gastrin
`13 (52)
`5-HIAA
`2 (25)
`5 (83)
`Hypercalcemia
`Insulin
`4 (67)
`2 (40)
`Corticotropin
`VIP
`2 (50)
`NS
`I (50)
`Glucagon
`*NS denotes not significant. 5-HIAA 5-hydroxyindoleaceiic acid, and
`VIP vasoactive intestinal peptide. Objective regression was defined as
`regression measured objectively by the methods described in the text.
`'l‘Nine patients had more than one endocrine-function abnormality.
`
`26 (52)
`24 (46)
`
`7 (37)
`29 (59)
`I4 (41)
`
`30 (48)
`14 (61)
`6 (38)
`
`38 (53)
`12 (40)
`
`23 (49)
`27 (49)
`
`50
`52
`
`19
`49
`34
`
`63
`23
`16
`
`72
`30
`
`47
`55
`
`2
`
`l\)J>LIIO\O\<WLII
`
`_
`
`West-Ward Ph
`Exhibit 1
`Page
`
`West-Ward Pharm.
`Exhibit 1023
`Page 003
`
`

`

`THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
`
`Feb. 20, 1992
`
`"-- Doxorubiein + streptozocin (n = 38)
`-—- Fluorouracil + streptozocin (n = 34)
`— Chlorozotocin (n = 33)
`
`was distinctly more tolerable. This difference was
`more striking than Table 4 indicates, since nausea and
`vomiting associated with chlorozotocin generally oc-
`curred for only a few hours after the single-dose treat-
`ment. On the other hand, the two streptozocin regi-
`mens were usually associated with nausea or vomiting
`lasting through the entire five days of treatment. Sto-
`matitis and diarrhea were essentially nonexistent in
`patients given chlorozotocin alone. Alopecia (data not
`shown) was almost universal with the regimen of dox-
`orubicin plus streptozocin. The frequency of hemato-
`logic toxicity was roughly comparable among the
`three treatment groups. Thrombocytopenia was more
`frequent with chlorozotocin, and leukopenia was more
`severe with fluorouracil plus streptozocin. As is typical
`for agents containing nitrosourea, there was a definite
`tendency to increased hematologic toxicity with long-
`term chlorozotocin therapy. Heart failure developed
`in three patients, possibly as a consequence of doxoru-
`
`Table 3. Length of Survival According to Patients‘
`Characteristics.
`
`CHARACTEIUSTIC
`Sex
`Male
`Female
`Age (yr)
`$40
`>40—60
`>60
`Time from diagnosis
`<3 mo
`3—<l2 mo
`>12 mo
`ECOG performance score
`0-]
`2-3
`Endocrine abnonnality
`Yes
`No
`
`*NS denotes not significant.
`
`No. or
`PATIENTS
`
`MEDIAN SURVIVAL
`(vn)
`
`5 1
`54
`
`20
`50
`35
`
`65
`17
`23
`
`74
`31
`
`49
`56
`
`bicin toxicity; in the case of one of these patients, the
`maximal dose of 500 mg per square meter specified in
`the protocol was exceeded. There was one treatment-
`related death, of a patient treated with fluorouracil
`plus streptozocin who had severe leukopenia compli-
`cated by sepsis.
`Nephrotoxicity was in most cases limited to a mild
`increase in serum creatinine. Nine patients had severe
`chronic renal insufficiency, however. Seven of them
`had azotemia requiring dialysis;
`two, both treated
`with streptozocin regimens, had severe Fanconi’s syn-
`drome. Since in many patients in this study the disease
`did not respond to treatment and they therefore had
`only short exposures to chlorozotocin or streptozocin,
`the figures in Table 4- undoubtedly underestimate the
`potential of these agents for causing chronic renal
`damage. Among the patients who received chlorozoto-
`cin, there was a clear relation between the total dose
`and chronic nephrotoxicity. No patient who received a
`total dose of 750 mg of chlorozotocin per square meter
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PatientswithoutProgression(%)
`
`Years after Start of Treatment
`
`Figure 2. Length of Time to Disease Progression, According to
`Treatment Group.
`P<0.001 for the comparison between doxorubicin plus streptozo-
`cin and fluorouracil plus streptozocin; P<0.001 for the compari-
`son between doxorubicin plus streptozocin and chlorozotocin.
`
`survival 12 months — both figures less favorable
`than with primary therapy.
`Since the end results of this study depended on the
`evaluation of response, we studied the association of
`endocrine response and tumor-size response. Among
`45 sets of adequate serial measurements of both tumor
`mass and endocrine abnormalities during primary or
`secondary treatment, 21 were recorded as indicating
`objective tumor regressions; 19 of these also showed a
`reduction in abnormal endocrine levels, and in one
`patient the endocrine level was unchanged. The only
`truly discordant results were in a patient who had a
`transient partial regression of malignant hepatomega-
`ly (lasting four months) in association with a rising
`serum gastrin level.
`Toxic Reactions
`
`Toxic reactions to the first cycle of therapy are
`shown in Table 4, which is a composite of observa-
`tions from both primary and secondary treatment.
`With regard to vomiting, the chlorozotocin regimen
`
`"" Doxorubicin + streptozocin (n = 38)
`-—-- Fluorouracil + streptozocin (n = 34)
`— chlorozotocin (n = 33)
`
`100 ~,
`
`PatientsAlive(%)
`
`Years after Start of Treatment
`
`Figure 3. Survival, According to Treatment Group.
`P<0.004 tor the comparison between doxorubicin plus streptozo-
`cin and fluorouracil plus streptozocin; P<0.03 for the comparison
`between doxorubicin plus streptozocin and chlorozotocin.
`
`West-Ward Pharm.
`Exhibit 1023
`Page 004
`
`

`

`Vol. 326 No. 8
`
`COMPARISON OF TREATMENTS FOR ISLET—CELL CARCINOMA — MOERTEL ET AL.
`
`523
`
`feet and more convenience in administration. This
`
`agent seems attractive as a possible replacement for
`streptozocin in combination regimens. Other agents
`with apparent activity in islet-cell carcinoma that
`have not yet been evaluated in randomized trials in-
`clude dacarbazine and interferon alfa.“’*'5
`
`In the past we have continued chemotherapy indefi-
`nitely in patients who have achieved an objective tu-
`mor regression, a practice that can be trying for pa-
`tients and that sometimes leads them to abandon
`
`therapy. In addition, such a policy can result in irre-
`versible chronic renal failure requiring dialysis. Fu-
`ture studies should examine the possibility of con-
`tinuing therapy only until the disease has stabilized,
`with maximal tumor regression. Considering the usual
`slow rate of growth of islet-cell tumors, such an ap-
`proach may allow patients more freedom from the
`stress of therapy before the malignant disease ad-
`vances to the point at which the resumption of therapy
`is justified.
`Clearly, islet-cell carcinoma is responsive to chemo-
`therapy, but the chance of long-term survival with
`current regimens remains small. There is strong justi-
`fication for continued clinical research into this rare
`disease.
`We are indebted to Ms. Helen Ranchuck for her assistance in
`data management.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`Broder LE, Caner SK. Pancreatic islet cell carcinoma. II. Results of therapy
`with streptozotocin in 52 patients. Ann Intem Med l973;79:l08-I8.
`Moertel CG, Hanley JA. Johnson LA. Streptozocin alone compared with
`streptozocin plus fluorouracil in the treatment of advanced islet-cell carcino-
`ma. N Engl J Med l9B0;303:l I89-94.
`Moertel CU, Lavin Fl‘, Hahn RG. Phase II trial of doxorubicin therapy for
`advanced islet cell carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rep l982;66:l567—9.
`Hoth D, Woolley P, Green D, Macdonald J. Schein P. Phase 1 studies on
`chlorozotocin. Clin Pharmacol Ther l978;23:7l2-22.
`Kovach JS, Moertel CG, Schutt AJ, et al. A phase I study of chlorozotocin.
`Cancer l979;43:2189-96.
`Cox DR. Regression models and life—tab|es. J R Stat Soc [B] l972;34:l87-
`220.
`Idem. The analysis of binary data. London: Chapman & Hall, I970.
`Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observa-
`tions. 1 Am Stat Assoc l958;53:4S7-8|.
`Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from
`retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst l959;22:7l9-48.
`Agresti A, Wackerly D, Boyett JM. Exact conditional tests for cross-classi-
`fications: approximation of attained significance levels. Psychometrika
`l977;44:75-83.
`Mehta CR, Patel NR, Tsiatis AA. Exact significance testing to establish
`treatment equivalence with ordered categorical data. Biometrics l984;40:
`819-25.
`Mehta CR, Patel NR. A network algorithm for performing Fisher's exact
`test in r X c contingency tables. .I Am Stat Assoc 1983;78:427-354.
`Moertel CG. An odyssey in the land of small tumors. J Clin Oncol 1987;
`l0:l502-22.
`Kessinger A, Foley JF, Lemon HM. Therapy of malignant APUD cell
`tumors: effectiyeness of DTIC. Cancer l983;5l:790-4.
`Ericksson B, Oberg K, Alm G, et al. Treatment of malignant endocrine
`tumors with human leukocyte interferon. Lancet l986:2:l307-9.
`
`West-Ward Pharm.
`Exhibit 1023
`Page 005
`
`Table 4. Toxic Reactions According to Treatment Group.
`FLUOROURACIL + Doxonuarcm +
`STREYTOZOCIN
`STREPTOZOCIN
`(N = 42)
`(N = 44)
`
`CHLOROZOTOCIN
`(N = 51)
`
`Toxic REACrroN*
`
`percent
`
`81
`41
`
`29
`
`77
`
`32
`I5
`7
`
`Vomiting
`Any
`Severe
`Stomatitis
`Any
`Severe
`Diarrhea
`Any
`Severe
`Leukopeniai
`<4>< I0’ cells/liter
`<2>< l0° cells/liter
`Thrombocytopenial’
`< IOOX I09 cells/liter
`<50X10° cells/liter
`Creatinine elevationi
`>0.03 mg/dl
`>1 .0 mg/dl
`Chronic renal insufficiency
`
`*For vomiting. stomatitis, diarrhea, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia, the results are for
`the first course of therapy only. The values for creatinine elevation are for all courses. Only the
`patients who had adequate documentation of toxic reactions are included.
`T0nly patients for whom adequate serial measurements were available are included.
`iTo convert values for creatinine to millimoles per liter. multiply by 88.4.
`
`or less had this complication, whereas 20 percent of
`those who received 751 to 1000 mg per square meter
`and 56 percent of those who received more than 1000
`mg per square meter had chronic renal failure.
`DISCUSSION
`
`Advanced islet-cell carcinoma has proved to be sur-
`prisingly sensitive to a variety of cytotoxic drugs — a
`sensitivity not shared by other neuroendocrine can-
`cers.” Streptozocin seems to have a specificity for this
`neoplasm, and we have observed a progressive in-
`crease in therapeutic effectiveness as we have moved
`from streptozocin alone to streptozocin plus fluoroura-
`cil and then to streptozocin plus doxorubicin. This
`effectiveness seems to be substantial, resulting in pal-
`liation of endocrine syndromes and, most important,
`improved survival. The duration of tumor regression
`and of improvement in endocrine syndromes was in
`the main relatively long, with a median of 1.5 years
`and a maximum of almost 8 years.
`Although the combination of streptozocin and dox-
`orubicin was the most effective, streptozocin produced
`frequent and often severe nausea and vomiting, which
`compromised both the patients’ quality of life and
`their compliance. Chlorozotocin was found to have
`therapeutic activity comparable to that of streptozo-
`cin plus fluorouracil, with considerably less emetic ef-
`
`West-Ward Pharm.
`Exhibit 1023
`Page 005
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket