throbber
Univ. of Minn
`Bio-Medical ·
`Library
`
`ARGENTUM
`Exhibit 1011
`
`000001
`
`

`

`Developmental Therapeutics: Molecular Therapeutics
`
`215s
`
`Publ ication Only
`3094
`Phase I pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic trial of week ly MS-275, an oral
`histone deacetylase inhibitor. E. A. Donovan, Q. Ryan, M. Acharya, E.
`Chung, J. Trepe/, K. Maynard, E. Sausville, A. Murgo, G. Melillo, B. Conley;
`National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
`is a histone
`Background: MS-275, a synth etic benzamide derivative,
`deacetylase (HDAC) inhib itor with in vitro & in vivo antitumor activity.
`Based on our q2 week dosi ng resu lts, we exp lored maximum to lerabl e dose
`(MTD) & dose limiting tox ic ity (DLT) for a week ly sched ule with 2 oral
`formu lations & 2 ad mi nistration conditions. Methods: MS-275 uncoated
`("A" with meal) or coated ("B" fasting) tablets were given weekly x4 q6
`weeks to pat ients (pts) with adva nced ma lignancy & PS :S 2, LFTss 2.5x
`normal, adequate hematopoetic & renal funct ion , & normal resting MUGA.
`Pharmacokinetics (PK) (va lidated LCMS method) & histone H3 acetylation
`(1-13Ac) in peripheral blood mononuclear cel ls (PBMC) (IHC image ana lysi s
`and novel f low cytometr ic assay for protein acetylat ion) were assessed .
`Results: 13 pts, ECOG PS = 1 (0 - 2 ) rece ived med ian of 1 (1 - 4) course. 4
`"A" (4 - 6 mg/m2) pts & 7 "B" (2- 4 mg/m2) pts were evaluable for cycle 1
`toxic ity (CTC v2.0). "A" grade 3 tox icit ies were hypoa lbum inemia, neutro(cid:173)
`pen ia & vomiting. On "B", 2 pts had DLT at 4 mg/m2, one with grade 4
`dyspnea/grade 3 pleuritic pain & dyspepsia & one with right heart fai lure,
`diarrhea & hypoalbum inem ia. Grade 1-2 tox ic ities in > 1 pt for A or B were
`thrombocytopen ia, fatigue , hype rglycem ia, taste disturban ce, hypoalbumin(cid:173)
`leucope nia,
`emia, hypoca lce mia, hypomagnesemia, hypophosphatemia,
`neutropenia, nausea, anorex ia, headache, dyspepsia, flatu lence, myalgias
`& insomnia. Enrollment is ongo ing on " B" 2 mg/m2 fast ing. Median Tmax
`was 0.5h (0.5- 6h). At 4 mg/m2, mea n Cmax was 38.2 ng/ml (14 - 71
`nglml) in "B" vs 4.8 ng/ml (4 - 6 ng/ml) in "A. Mean AUC at 2, 4, & 6
`mg/m 2: 190, 284, & 358 ng* h/ml, respectively. PBMC H3Ac was seen at
`all dose leve ls. 3 pts had stab le disease , 2 at 4 mg/m2 (colon , CTCL) & l at
`2 mg/m2 (CTCL). Conclusions: The MTD for coated MS-2 75 given fasting
`on thi s schedu le was exceeded at 4 mg/m2 p.o. week ly x4 q6 weeks. AUC
`increased with dose. Drug-related hyperacety lat ion was observed.
`
`Publication Only
`3096
`A phase II trial of temsirolimus in metastatic neuroendocrine carcinomas
`(NEC s). /. Duran, L. Le, D. Saltman, J. Kortmansky, W. Kocha, D. Singh,
`G. R. Pond, J. M. Peralba, J. Dancey, L. L. Siu; Princess Margaret Hasp
`Phase II Consortium, Toronto, ON, Canada; Memorial Sloan-Kettering
`Cancer Ctr, New York, NY; Univ of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Johns Hopkins
`Univ Sell of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda,
`MD
`Background: NECs are a varied group of endocrin e neoplasms characterized
`by neurosecretory granu les and ce ll surface markers. Except for islet ce ll
`ca rcinomas, NECs are resistant to co nventiona l cytotox ics. Hormona l
`t herapy such as somatostatin ana logs or loca l t herap ies such as hepatic
`resect ion or arteri al embolizat ion are generally del ivered to pal li ate symp(cid:173)
`toms. Tems irol imus is a nove l mTOR inhibitor th at down regu lates cascades
`activated by loss of the tumor suppressor protein PTEN, a defect reported in
`moderately differentiated N ECs. Due to th e lack of effective system ic
`therapy for NECs, loss of PTEN detected in some cases, and a report of a
`part ial response in thi s tumor type from phase I trial s, a multi-centre
`2-stage phase II tr ial in NECs was cond ucted. Methods: Patients were
`eligible if they demonstrated 25% increase in tumor volume, cli nical
`deteri oration or new t umor focus in the last 6 months. Temsirolim us 25 mg
`was administered intravenously over 30 min utes on a week ly basis. Results:
`To date, 23 patients (pts) with progressive NECs have been enrolled with
`the fo llowing demographics from 18 pts with baseli ne data: med ian
`age = 55 , range = 36-68, M:F = 9:9, ECOG 0:1:2 = 8 :9: 1, and 11 pts l1ad
`prior chemotherapy. Toxicity information is avai lable from 15 pts in 50 four
`week ly cyc les. Th e most frequently encountered grade 3-4 toxicities
`expressed as % of treatment cycles are: hypophosphatemia ( 14 %),
`hyperglycem ia (10%), cough (10%), hypoka lem ia (8%), hypercho lesterol (cid:173)
`em ia (8%), and hypertension (8%). The most frequent toxi c ities cons ider(cid:173)
`ing all grades are: fatigue (86%), anemia (7 6%) and lymphopenia (70% ).
`Among 15 pts evaluable for response th us far, 10 have achieved prolonged
`sta ble disease (range: 3-11 cycles), including 1 pt wit h a 24% tumor
`shri nkage by REC IST criter ia after 4 cycles, and 2 pts who have experi(cid:173)
`enced significant clin ica l benefit and are on cycl es 9 and ll, respectively.
`Levels of p70S6kinase in periphera l blood mononuc lear ce lls at 24 hours
`post treatm ent have not shown correlation with clinica l outcome in t l1e
`majority of pts. Markers of ce ll cycle inhibition and apoptosis in paired
`tumor biopsies will be reported Conclusions: Temsirolim us appears to have
`antitumor activ ity in NECs, study accru al is ongo ing.
`
`3093
`Publication Only
`olein (Pgp) inhibitor

`.
`T ·
`p 1
`~ C F.
`anqurdar (XR9576) is a potent and effectrve
`-g ycopr
`that can be administered safely with chemotherapy. M. E. Me;e eeS B :n,
`M. Edgerly, D. Draper, C. Chen, R. Robey, F. Balis, W. D.
`tgg,
`· a es,
`A. T. Fojo; NIHINCI, Bethesda, MD
`.
`)
`(P
`.
`B
`a means to rm prove
`gp as
`ackground: Inh ibition of P-glycoprotern
`en h othesis. Two
`. YP
`chemothe rapeutic effi cacy re ma1ns a va l1d but unprov
`t

`·d
`re
`.

`the Pgp 1nh 1b1tor, ar1qu 1 ar
`W
`ce nt trr als in pat ients with lu ng ca nce r us1ng
`t
`(XR95
`· ·t concerns
`e repor ou r
`. 76), c losed prematu rely due to tox iCI Y M th d~· Patients with
`e 0iv~d tariq ui dar on
`experr ence using tariquida r with chemotherapy.
`~efractory or metastatic adrenocortical ca ncer (ACC~rece vincr istine, and
`ays 1 & 3 with a 96-hou r infusiOn of doxoru
`IC in, with refractor
`etoposide witll mitotane (X-MAVE) every 21 days. Pa~~=~~cetaxel infusio~
`~varran, ce rvi ca l & lung ca nce r rece ived tarl q~~~,ar ~~~stamibi scans. Time(cid:173)
`Tc ~e cu rve ca lculated to
`a very 2 1 days. Study partic ipants had two
`ctlvlty cu rves were generated and areas under tl'
`to that 1 h after
`compare 99"'Tc-sesta mibi acc umu lat1on at base lne
`d b f
`d
`II was measure
`e ore an
`tar'

`6
`f lqUidar. Rhodam ine efflux from CD5 + ce s T d te 15 patients with
`~6er tariquidar to assess Pgp inhibition. Results: 1 ~ :ti~nts with ovari an ,
`~ docetaxel Grade 3
`C have received 71 cycles of X-MAVE, and
`cervica l or lung canc er have received 66 cycle~ 0 'th X-MAVE include:
`n~n-hematologic tox icities (# of cyc les) observe ~~a/vom iting (2), diar(cid:173)
`~h dom 1na1 pa in/con st ipat ion (4), arth ralgia (4), na~·on (l) and hyponatre(cid:173)
`mea ( 1 ), esop hagit is ( l), fati gue (6), ha nd-foot reac d s ne~ (1) fat igue (6),
`h Ia (3 ); those wit h docetaxe l incl ude: dlarrh,;~,V \:St~lnibi accumu lat ion
`i~Ponatrem i a (3), pa in (3 ) and tearrng (2).
`.
`c se of 106% in the liver,
`in creased 39 to 129%, compa red to a mea n 1 ncr~avisua l ized. Quantitat ion
`f 6 of 8 patients with ACC whose les1ons coul~ b 1 ng cance r is ongoing.
`Ro~ the 10 suc h patients with ovarra n, cerv lca ;~ :atients was reduced by
`odam 1ne efflux from CD56+ ce lls assayed In
`· d even after 48 h.
`~hlnean of 85% after tariquidar and was sust~~~ has been performed.
`C armacokinetic sampling before and after tarlq~/ tive Pgp inh ibitor t hat
`c~llclusrons:. Tari quidar is a potent and highly e 0~cdoxorubic i n, etoposide
`an~ be admin istered sa fe ly w1th a comb ination in patients wit h refrac tory
`Vlnc rr stlne or with docetaxel. The eff1cacy
`cancers co ntinu es to be eva luated.
`
`3095
`A Ph
`intravenously
`kl multiple dose
`solid tumors. E. Calvo,
`ad . ase I dose-escalation study of . wee Y
`A tnrnrstered SR271 425 in patients wrth refrac.tork G Shackleton J. -G.
`M C: Lockhart, A. W. Tolcher, E. K. Rowms y, & Research Ctr, San
`A~;2son, R. Rafi, M. L. Rothenberg; Cancer z:,erat~shville, TN; Sanof(cid:173)
`Synt~to, TX; Vanderbilt-Ingram Canc~r S
`tile/abo Research, Malvern,
`PA
`elabo Research, Malvern , PA; Sana t- yn
`
`Publication Only
`
`is a nove l cytotoxic
`R271425
`Back
`DNA ground: Th e thioxanthone ana log, S
`of' ant itu mor activity in
`Prec t-lnteracting agent with a broad spectr~:al tria l aims to determine
`to te lnlca l murine tumor models. Th iS clln -hou r single intravenous dose
`rep rab 1l1ty and tox ic it ies of SR271425 as a {
`ek rest
`to determin e the
`~e hase rl dose (RP II D), and
`rna:ated weekly fo r 2 weeks fol lowed by
`to a~mumtolerated dose (MTD), recommendde . ~modified Fibonacc i dose
`esc
`ess 1ts pharmacokinetic prof1le. Metho s. ous dose of SR271425 is
`ad~atlon design is being used . A s1ngle lntravfe~lowed by 1 week rest, in a
`Va( \ni stered over 1-hour week ly for 2 weeks, 0
`the rabbit model, QTc
`Pralle Y of refractory sol id tumors. Of note, ~n d at doses > 660mg/m,_
`The~ngat1on, related to Cmax, has been repo~ e assessment with serial
`E:cG:fore •. all patients are undergoing cardl~~!~r Results: To date, 17
`64 -675 mg/m 2/week) .
`Pat'
`· Wh 1ch are assessed by a central rev
`Th~ents have been treated at 5 ~ose levels (r~nf~~G performance status is
`o_2 mean age IS 53 (range 24 -74 yea rs) an
`ngation, nausea/vom it ing/
`1
`con s·t'G rade l - 2 tox icities 1nclud 1ng QTc prado The pharmacokinet ics of
`1Pat1on , and fati gue l1ave been observe ·. tent with that observed
`SR 27
`Previol425 fol lowing weekly dosing were coi~~~\R27 1425. Botl1 Cmax
`and All sly 1n a single dose ascend1ng study wd
`t manner. As wou ld be
`Predic Uc (day l) increased in a dose depe~ ~~system ic acc umulation
`wa
`ted from the drugs short l1a lf-l1fe (6.7
`),
`Day 1 versu s Day 8.
`nd c values on
`C
`s Obser d
`Stab I
`. ve as assessed by max a
`t conclusions: Preliminary
`data~ disease has been observed Ill 3 pa~~~;~425 ad min istered at spl it,
`t'
`Weeki n th 1s ongo1ng study suggests that S
`exposure without s1gn1f1-
`1
`ca Y doses will li kely allow greater cumu a IVe
`nt toxicity.
`
`1S
`
`6"-
`
`000002
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket