throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`Case IPR2017-01053
`Patent 8,268,299
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`ARGENTUM PHARMACEUTICALS LLC,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`ALCON RESEARCH, LTD.,
`Patent Owner
`
`
`Case IPR2017-01053
`Patent 8,268,299
`
`
`ALCON RESEARCH, LTD.’S MOTION TO SEAL AND MOTION FOR
`ENTRY OF PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`Case IPR2017-01053
`
`Patent 8,268,299
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.14 and 42.54, Patent Owner Alcon Research,
`
`Ltd. (“Alcon”) hereby respectfully moves to seal confidential laboratory notebooks
`
`and adjunctive data (Exhibits 2008–2022), portions of the Declaration of Dr. Henry
`
`Grabowski, Ph.D. (Exhibit 2029), and certain exhibits on which Dr. Grabowski
`
`relied in forming his opinions (Exhibits 2040–2058). In support of this Motion,
`
`Alcon is also submitting a proposed protective order (Exhibit 2140), which is the
`
`Default Standing Protective Order. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.54(a).
`
`A. Motion to Seal
`The standard for granting a motion to seal is “for good cause.” 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.54; Decision – Revised Motion to Seal, Garmin Int’l, Inc. v. Cuozzo Speed
`
`Techs. LLC, Case IPR2012-00001 (JL), at 4 (Apr. 5, 2013) (hereinafter Garmin
`
`Decision). Good cause exists for sealing these exhibits.
`
`Laboratory notebooks and adjunctive data
`
`1.
`Exhibits 2008–2022 are excerpts of confidential laboratory notebooks and
`
`adjunctive data used by Alcon employees to record their research and development
`
`work. These documents are being submitted in support of affidavits filed pursuant
`
`to 37 C.F.R. § 42.61 describing how certain data in the specifications of Alcon
`
`patents were generated. Although the data on which Alcon relies in this
`
`proceeding are disclosed in public patent specifications, the documents Alcon
`
`proposes to seal also disclose internal Alcon laboratory methods and practices and
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case IPR2017-01053
`
`
`Patent 8,268,299
`
`
`additional, unpublished testing data. Public disclosure of these confidential,
`
`internal documents reflecting Alcon’s research and development work has the
`
`potential to cause Alcon competitive harm.
`
`Because the data on which Alcon relies in this proceeding are already in the
`
`public record, the public’s interest in having access to these documents in order to
`
`“maintain a complete and understandable file history” is minimal. Garmin
`
`Decision at 8 (balancing need for confidentiality against public’s interest).
`
`Moreover, pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.61, these documents are being submitted in
`
`conjunction with the declarations of Bhagwati Kabra, Ph.D., and Stephen Shannon,
`
`MBA, Ph.D. Dr. Kabra’s and Dr. Shannon’s declarations explain the testing data
`
`in the patent specification, explain in general the significance of the laboratory
`
`notebooks and adjunctive data, and are not being filed under seal. Accordingly, a
`
`“complete and understandable file history” will be available to the public even if
`
`these exhibits are sealed.
`
`2.
`
`Summaries of IMS Health/IQVIA and Encuity Research
`Data
`
`Exhibits 2040–2058 summarize data provided to Alcon by IMS
`
`Health/IQVIA and Encuity Research. These exhibits contain data on sales, units,
`
`prescriptions, and promotional spending for a number of pharmaceutical products.
`
`These data were provided by IMS Health/IQVIA and Encuity Research to Alcon or
`
`to counsel for Alcon pursuant to agreements to keep the data confidential. It is
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case IPR2017-01053
`
`
`Patent 8,268,299
`
`
`undersigned counsel’s understanding that IMS Health/IQVIA and Encuity
`
`Research charge customers for these data, that they do not make their data
`
`generally available to the public, and that they would be harmed by the public
`
`disclosure of these data without a confidentiality agreement.
`
`The public’s interest in having access to these exhibits is minimal. See
`
`Garmin Decision at 8. These exhibits are being provided in support of the
`
`declaration of Dr. Henry Grabowski, Ph.D. In conjunction with this motion, Alcon
`
`is submitting a non-confidential, redacted version of Dr. Grabowski’s declaration.
`
`The substance of Dr. Grabowski’s opinions can be fully ascertained from the
`
`redacted declaration; the only information not reflected in the redacted declaration
`
`is data from IMS Health/IQVIA and Encuity Research and Dr. Grabowski’s
`
`specific calculations based on that data. Moreover, interested members of the
`
`public can obtain the data in question directly from IMS Health/IQVIA and
`
`Encuity Research (presumably for a fee).
`
`Dr. Grabowski’s Declaration
`
`3.
`Exhibit AL 2029 is the declaration of Dr. Henry Grabowski, Ph.D. This
`
`exhibit discloses data (and calculations derived therefrom) obtained from IMS
`
`Health/IQVIA and Encuity Research. As explained above, good cause exists to
`
`seal these data, see supra Part A.2, and for the same reasons, good cause exists to
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case IPR2017-01053
`
`
`Patent 8,268,299
`
`
`seal the portions of Dr. Grabowski’s declaration which disclose these data or
`
`calculations derived therefrom.
`
`Proposed Protective Order
`
`B.
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.54, Alcon is submitting a proposed protective
`
`order, attached hereto as Exhibit 2140, which is the Default Standing Protective
`
`Order. Alcon requests that the proposed protective order be entered and that its
`
`terms govern the confidentiality of the exhibits which are the subject of this
`
`motion.
`
`C. Certification of Conference with Opposing Party Pursuant to 37
`C.F.R. § 42.54
`
`Alcon certifies that it wrote to Argentum’s counsel on December 22, 2017
`
`regarding Argentum’s consent to the entry of the proposed protective order, but did
`
`not receive a response before filing this motion.
`
`D. Conclusion
`For the foregoing reasons, Alcon respectfully requests that its motion to seal
`
`be granted and that the PTAB enter the proposed protective order.
`
`
`
`Dated: December 22, 2017
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/David M. Krinsky/
`David M. Krinsky
`Reg. No. 72,339
`Lead Counsel for
`Patent Owner
`
`5
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2017-01053
`
`Patent 8,268,299
`
`Williams & Connolly LLP
`725 Twelfth Street NW
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`202-434-5338 (Telephone)
`202-434-5029 (Facsimile)
`dkrinsky@wc.com
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`
`
`
`Case IPR2017-01053
`
`Patent 8,268,299
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e))
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing “ALCON RESEARCH,
`
`LTD.’S MOTION TO SEAL AND MOTION FOR ENTRY OF PROPOSED
`
`PROTECTIVE ORDER” was served on December 22, 2017, via electronic mail
`
`upon the following attorneys of record for the Petitioner:
`
`Michael R. Houston
`Joseph P. Meara
`James P. McParland
`FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
`mhouston@foley.com
`jmeara-pgp@foley.com
`jmcparland@foley.com
`ARG-travatanZ@foley.com
`
`Tyler C. Liu
`ARGENTUM PHARMACEUTICALS LLC
`tliu@agpharm.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/David M. Krinsky/
`David M. Krinsky
`Reg. No. 72,339
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: December 22, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket