throbber

`
`MILDRED S. CHRISTIAN
`
`

`

`Journal of
`the American College
`of Toxicology
`
`Editor-in-Chief: Mildred S. Christian
`
`Assistant to the Editor: Ca ro lyn P. Nettles
`
`Argus Resea rch Laborato ries, In c.
`935 H o rsham Road
`H orsham, PA 79044
`(2 15) 443-8710
`
`Arth ur Furst
`Institute of Chemica l Bio logy
`University of San Fran cisco
`Sa n Francisco, CA 94 7 7 7
`(415) 666-64 15
`
`GENERAL TOXI CO LOGY
`Section Editor
`Bruce K. Bernard
`Washingto n, DC
`
`Secl io n Associate Edit o rs
`Joseph F. Bo rzelleca
`Wa yne M . G a lbraith
`Do nald Hughes
`Rud olph J. Jaeger
`Ca rol A. M apes
`Ian C. Munro
`
`ACUTE AND SU BCHRONI C TOXICITY
`Section Ed ito r
`Ric ha rd A. Pare nt
`Baton Rouge, LA
`
`SAFETY EVALUATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT
`Secli o n Edit o r
`Robert G . Ta rd iff
`Springfield, VA
`
`CARC INOG ENESIS
`Section Edito r
`Yin-tak Woo
`Wa shington, DC
`
`Section Associate Editors
`F. Peter Cuengerich
`Charles C. Irving
`David Y. Lai
`John H . Weisbu rger
`Hanspeter R. Wit schi
`
`IMMUN OTOX ICOLOGY
`Section Editor
`Stewa rt Wong
`Waverly, PA
`DEVELOPMENTAL AND REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY
`Section Editor
`E. Marshall Joh nso n
`Phi ladelph ia, PA
`
`Associate Editors
`Robert M. Diener
`Ciba-Geigy Pharma ceuticals Division
`Summit, NJ 0790 1
`(201) 277-5430
`
`Editorial Board
`
`Section Associate Edilo rs
`Tho ma s H. Shepard
`Rober! E. Slaples
`Pe1er Voy1ek
`Ernest F. Zimmerman
`GENETIC TOXICOLOGY
`Seclion Edilo r
`W.Gary Flamm
`Rockville, MD
`Section Associate Editors
`Virginia Dunkel
`George Hoffmann
`Verne A. Ray
`EPIDEMIOLOGY AND CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY
`Section Edilor
`Edward J. Calabrese
`Amhe rst , MA
`MECHANISMS OF TOXI CITY
`Section Editor
`Ronald W. Ha rt
`Je ((e rson, AR
`Section Associate Ed itor
`Gerald N. Wogan
`DEVELOPMENT OF NON-A NIMAL TESTING TECHNIQUES
`Sect ion Editor
`Alan M . Goldbe rg
`Ba ltimore, MO
`Sectio n Associate Editors
`Thoma s E. Hickey
`De nnis Stark
`QUALITY ASSURANCE
`Section Editor
`Jane E. Goeke
`Horsham , PA
`VETERINARY TOXICOLOGY
`Section Editor
`E. Muri Bai ley, Jr .
`EDITOR FOR BOOK REVIEWS
`Wayne M. Galbrai th
`Arlingto n, VA
`
`

`

`\
`'
`
`GENERAL INFORMATION
`
`The Journal of the American College of Toxicolog y publishes fully refereed papers covering the
`entire field of toxicology. These include research in risk assessment, general toxicology, carcino(cid:173)
`genicity, safety evaluation, reproductive and genetic toxicology, epidemiology and clinical toxi(cid:173)
`cology, mechanisms of toxicity, new approaches to toxicological testing, and alternatives to ani(cid:173)
`mal testing. Reviews and major symposia in the field are included .
`
`Journal of the American College of Toxicology (ISSN:0730-09 13) is published bimonth ly for $130 per
`year by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., 1651 Third Ave nue, New York NY 10128 . (2 12) 289-2300. Second(cid:173)
`class postage paid at New York, NY and at additional mai ling offices.
`
`Postmaster: Send address changes to Journal of the American College of Toxicology c/o Subscrip(cid:173)
`tion Department, Mary Ann Lieb~rt, Inc., Publi shers, 1651 Th ird Ave nue, New York, NY 10128.
`
`Subscriptions should be addressed to the Publisher and are paya ble in adva nce. Rates are $130 per
`volume of 6 issues in the United States and Possessions, $163 ai r mail , elsewhere.
`
`Reprints, except ·special orders of 100 or more, are ava ilable fro m the authors.
`
`Business communications should be addressed to the Publisher.
`
`Advertising inquiries should be add ressed to Ma ry Ann Liebert, Inc. , 1651 Third Avenue, New
`York, NY 10128. (2 12) 289-2300.
`
`Manuscripts should be directed to the Editor: Mildred Christian , A rgus Resea rch, 935 Horsham Rd.,
`Horsham , PA 19044.
`.
`
`All authored papers and editori al news and comments, opinions, findings, concl usions, or recom(cid:173)
`mendations in the Journal of the American College of Toxicology are those of the author(s), and do
`not necessarily refl ect th e views of the journal and its publisher, nor does their publication in the
`Jo urnal of the American College of Toxicology infer any endorsement.
`
`Copyright © 1988 by The American College ofToxicology. Printed in th e United States of America.
`
`Thi s Journal is indexed in Current Contents and Science Citation Index.
`
`16~1 n.1u h o-. I!... To,~, J, Y,
`
`IOU!
`
`...
`
`!6~iTl,fr·A ....... . - 1-,\, J./
`
`I Ona
`
`

`

`JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE O F TOXICOLOGY
`Volume 7, Number 3, 1988
`M•ry Ann Liebert, Inc., Publishers
`
`3
`
`Final Report on the Safety
`Assessment of Polyquaternium-1 O
`
`Polyquaternium-10 is a polymeric quaternary ammonium derivative of hy(cid:173)
`droxyethyl cellulose that is used in cosmetics as a conditioner, thickener and
`emollient at concentrations of :s; 0.1%-5%. Polyquaternium-10 has, at .'.nost,
`only a low potential to penetrate the stratum corneum but is adsorbed by ke(cid:173)
`ratinous surfaces. The oral LDso of Polyquaternium-10 was not obtained at 16
`g/kg in rats. Inhalation, dermal, and ocular animal test data indicated, at
`most, only a low degree of toxicity at test concentrations of Polyquaternium-
`10 greater than that used in cosmetic products. Polyquaternium-10 with and
`without metabolic activation was not a mutagen in three separate assay sys(cid:173)
`tems. Polyquaternium-10 was neither an irritant nor a human sensitizer when
`tested at 2.0 %. Cosmetic products containing .up to 1 % Polyquaternium-10
`were not human irritants, sensitizers, or photosensitizers. On the basis of the
`information presented, it is concluded that Polyquaternium-10 is safe as a
`cosmetic ingredient in the present practices of use.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Polyquaternium-1 O is a cationic form of hyd~oxyethyl cellulos~ that adsorb_s
`
`and sorbs well to proteinaceous surfaces. It 1s used 1n cosmetics as a condi(cid:173)
`tioner, thickener, and emollient in hair care products, lotions, and makeup.
`
`CHEMISTRY
`
`Definition
`Polyquaternium-10, also known as Quaternium-19, i~ a pol_ymeric quater(cid:173)
`nary ammonium salt of hydroxyethyl cellulose reacted w ith a tnm~thyl am~o(cid:173)
`nium substituted epoxide. There are va rious grad~s of Polyquaternium-10 with
`different average molecular weights generally ranging from 250,000 to 600,000.
`Polyquaternium-10 has three CAS numbers: 53568-66-4, 54351-50-7, and
`55353-19-0. (J-3)
`
`Chemical and Physical Properties
`Po lyquaternium-1 O is a w hite granular powder with a characteristic ~mi ne
`odor. It is soluble in water and insol uble in alcohol and nonpolar orga nic sol-
`
`335
`
`

`

`336
`
`COSMETIC INGREDIE NT REVIEW
`
`vents. Polyquaternium-1 O used in cosm etics has 0. 5% m ax im um water insolu(cid:173)
`bles 1.7 to 2.2% nitrogen-containing components, 2% maxim um ash (NaCl)
`and ' 6% maximum volatile material. T he particle size speci fication s are 95°!;
`minimum throu gh a 20 mesh filter and 85 % minimum through a 40 mesh filter.
`Th e viscosity of a 2% aqueous solution (25° ( ) is between 60 and 150 centi(cid:173)
`poises. t•>
`Polyquaternium-1 O alters the su rface tensio n of aqu eo u s so lution s of ani(cid:173)
`onic surfactants. Addition of 1 % and 2% Po lyqua ternium-10 lowered the sur(cid:173)
`face tension of aqueous sol utions of sodi um lauryl sulfate, sodium tridecylben(cid:173)
`zenesulfonate, and potassium laurate. t5
`>
`
`I i
`
`1
`I
`
`Reactivity
`
`Polyquaterniu m-1 O is a cationic, surface-active polymer that is adsorbed by
`keratinous surfaces, such as hair and skin (stratum corneum). The ad sorption of
`the polymer was not readily affected by pH in the range o f 4 to 10. It undergoes
`slow hydrolyt ic cleavage outside this pH range. Sorption of Polyquaternium-10
`to keratinou s surfaces was decreased by the addition of electrolytes (salts), such
`as aluminum, iron, calcium , or sodium . Polyquaternium -10 i s biologically de(cid:173)
`gradable. The presence of ethyl alcohol o r propylene glycol add s to th e stability
`of Polyquaternium-10. (6- 9 1
`
`Analytical M ethods
`
`The most common anal yti ca l method for qu aternary ammonium com(cid:173)
`pounds is colorimetri c testing following separation by acid extraction . tio,
`
`M ethod of Manu facture
`
`Polyquaternium-10 is generally produced by reac tin g hyd ro xyethylcellulose
`with epichlorhydrin, followed by quaterni za tion usi ng t rime th ylamine. It is
`stable within a pH rane of 4 to 8.
`
`Impurities
`
`Inorganic impurities of Polyquaternium-1 O used in co smetics include water
`(up to 0.5%), nitrogen (1.7 to 2.2%), and ash (NaCl up to 2%) . Information was
`not available on organic impurities of Polyqu atern ium-1 O. <•> Epic hlorhydrin was
`not detected in any of six different Polyquaternium polymers analyzed with an
`aver~ge detection limit of about 0.5 ppm .t 11 > A maximum of 10.8 ppm Trimeth(cid:173)
`ylami ne was detected in lots of Polyquaternium-1 o th at were produced and sold
`during 1985.t 12 >
`
`USE
`Purpose in Cosmetics
`
`_Polyquate~nium-10 is used as a conditio ner, emollient and viscosity con(cid:173)
`trolling agent 1n cosmetics. <J. 1J.1 • 1
`
`

`

`ASSESSMENT: POL YQUA TERNI UM-10
`
`337
`
`Scope and Extent of Use in Cosmetics
`
`Polyquaternium- 10 is used primarily in hair care products, skin cleansers,
`and ski n moisturi zers in concentrations of :s;0.1 %-5%. One hundred thirty-nine
`(139) of the vo luntarily filed cosmetic product formulations were reported to the
`Food and Drug Adm inistration to contain Polyquaternium-10Y 5 > The cosmetic
`product formulation data that are made available by the FDA are compiled
`through voluntary fi ling of such data in accordance with Title 21 pa rt 720.4 of
`the Code of Federal Regulations. 116> Ingredients are listed in prescribed concen(cid:173)
`tration ran ges under specific product type categories. Since certain cosmetic in(cid:173)
`gredients are supplied by the manufacturer at less than 100% concentration, the
`value reported by the cosmetic formulator may not necessarily reflect the actual
`concentration found in the finished product; the actual concentration would be
`a fraction of that reported to the FDA . Data submitted within the framework of
`preset concentration ran ges provide the opportunity for overestimation of the
`actual concent ratio n of an ingredient in a particular product. An entry at the
`lowest end of a concen tration range is considered the same as one entered at
`the highest end of that range, thus int roduci ng the possibility of a 2- to 10-fold
`error in the assumed ingredient concentration (Table 1 ).
`.
`Polyquaternium-1 O has been generally or individually approved for use in
`cosmetic formulations marketed in Japan. <11
`>
`
`Surfaces, Frequency, and Duration of Application
`
`The hair ca re products con taining Polyquaternium-10 are, for t~e most _pa.rt,
`applied for a few minutes, then rin sed off. However, P~lyquatern,um-1 0 ,s in(cid:173)
`corporated in these products for its "substantivity" (sorpt,on) and w_ould be ex(cid:173)
`pected to rem ain in contact with the hair between treatments. Skin cl~ansers
`and moisturi zers have the potential to remain in continuous contact with the
`skin and nails for extended periods of time.
`
`BIOLOGY
`
`J
`I
`l
`
`Penetratio n, Sorption, and Permeation Through Stratum Corn eum
`I f
`of 14( -Polyquaterni um-10
`Approximately 1 ml of a 5% (w/~) water. so u ,on
`lied to the backs of 12
`(uniformly labeled on the pendant side chain) was app
`h
`t
`·od 1
`.
`f
`1/k
`occluded for t e tes pen
`•
`Fischer 344 rats. The total dose o _4.0 m g was
`boli sm cages designed
`3, and 24 h. Six rats were plac~d in Roth-type gla~s ~:t~ for the entire 24-h ex(cid:173)
`for the separate collection of urine, feces, an.d expire
`k.ll d 3 at 1 h and 3 at
`posure period. The remaining 6 exposed ant~ ~\ 1~;~h~ i~t~rim sacrifices and
`6-h postexposure. Blood measured at 1 h an
`no radioactivity above back-
`for the 6 material balance rats killed at 24 h had
`ground. There was no radioactivity above backgrou\ ,n i 02 01, of the adminis-
`d .
`ny of 9 tissues exam-
`ined in the 6 animals _that wer~ killed at 2\ \ ~e~~,: i~~h~ fec;s; no radioactiv(cid:173)
`tered dose was fo u~d in the urine and l~ss t fa he ·total dose that was recovered
`1
`tty was recovered tn CO2. Of the 83. 7 to 0
`terials and 7 .1 % was fou nd
`.
`1
`from the male rats, 75 .2% was from the occ us,ve ma
`
`

`

`TABLE 1. Produce Formulacion Daca for Polyquacernium- 10""
`
`Product category
`
`Bubble baths
`Mascara
`Hair cond icioners
`Hair sprays (aerosol fixacives)
`Permanenc waves
`Hair shampoos (noncoloring)
`Tonics, dressings, and ocher hair grooming a,ds
`Wave sels
`Ocher hair preparacions (noncoloring)
`Hair shampoos (coloring)
`Makeup bases
`Bath soaps and detergents
`Skin cleansing preparacions (cold creams, loc,ons,
`liquids, and pads)
`Face, body, and hand skin care prepara c,ons (excluding
`shaving preparations)
`Moisturizing skin care prepara1 ions
`Night skin care preparations
`Paste masks (mud packs)
`Skin fresheners
`Wrinkle smoothers (removers)
`Other skin ca re preparacions
`
`1981 TOTALS
`
`Total no. of
`fo rmulat ions
`,n catego ry
`
`Total no.
`conta,nmg
`,ngredient
`
`N o. of produc t formula tions within each
`co ncentration range ( % )
`
`U nreported
`concentration
`
`> 1- 5
`
`>0. 1-1
`
`:SO. /
`
`475
`397
`478
`265
`474
`909
`290
`180
`177
`16
`831
`148
`680
`
`832
`
`747
`219
`171
`260
`38
`349
`
`I
`5
`16
`l
`6
`62
`4
`6
`I
`3
`2
`l
`6
`
`8
`
`12
`I
`l
`l
`l
`I
`
`139
`
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`
`2
`
`-
`
`I
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`3
`
`-
`6
`-
`
`l
`9
`-
`2
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`
`-
`9
`l
`5
`46
`3
`3
`1
`3
`-
`
`I
`
`3
`
`3
`-
`-
`-
`-
`1
`
`18
`
`81
`
`5
`
`7
`
`2
`
`3
`
`5
`
`a
`I
`I
`I
`l
`-
`37
`
`.....
`...,
`
`00
`
`(")
`0
`VI
`~
`m
`-4
`;:;
`z
`C)
`;IQ
`m
`0
`m
`z
`-4
`;c m
`< ;;;
`:£
`
`- --A----
`
`

`

`ASSESSMENT: POLYQUATERNIUM-10
`
`339
`
`i~ or around the ski_n at the dose site. The fraction of the applied material that
`~1~ penetr?te th~ skin amounted to less than 1.5% of the administered radioac(cid:173)
`t1v1ty. The _investigators noted the low total recovery of the applied radioactivity;
`however, 1f the data were normalized to 100%, less than 1.75% of the applied
`?ose w~uld h~ve penetrated the skin. The authors concluded that Polyquater-
`1um-l0 1s unlikely to penetrate the human skin in toxicologically significant
`amounts.< 18
`9 >
`• 1
`. Th_e anti-irritant e~ect of hydroxyl and quaternary am monium compounds,
`including Polyquatern,um-10, has been investigated in recent years. It has been
`hypothesized that the sorption properties of Polyquaternium-10 enable the
`polymer to block keratin reactive sites, thus reducing the topical and eye irritant
`effects of surfactants in shampoo and cleanser formulations. <20-2 1>
`Several studies have investigated the passage of Polyquaternium-10 and sur(cid:173)
`factants, such as sodium lauryl sulfate, into and through isolated stratum cor(cid:173)
`neum from the skin of fetal pigs, neonatal rats, and adult humans. The fetal pig(cid:173)
`skin was frozen, and on warming, the stratum corneum was gently separated
`from the underlyi ng epidermis. Neonatal rat skin was removed following death
`by CO2 inhalation. The skin was placed in a desiccator jar and exposed to am(cid:173)
`monia vapor for 1- 3 h, then put in water to remove the epiderm is from the der(cid:173)
`mis. After 1 h the epidermis was recovered on a paper towel, and the mal(cid:173)
`pighian layer was scraped off, leaving the stratum corneum to dry. The various
`preparations were exposed to ••e-Polyquaternium-10 and/or surfactant (i n aque(cid:173)
`ous solution) in via ls or permeability cellsP 2
`> to quantify sorption and perme(cid:173)
`ability and to evaluate the effects of the polymer on the preparations. The results
`indicated that Polyquaternium-10 slowly diffused into the outer layer of the
`stratum corneum (all three species) rather than forming multilayers on the sur(cid:173)
`face. Although ionic surfacta nts did reduce polymer sorption, pretreatment of
`the stratum corneum with 1 % Polyquaternium-10 greatly reduced the amount
`of surfactant that passed through the preparation. This reductio_n in per~.e~tion
`of surfacta nt supported the hypothesis that Polyquaternium-10 1s an ant1-1mtant
`in the presence of ionic (i.e., irritant) surfactants. The kinetics of polym_er/s~rfac(cid:173)
`tant sorption and permeation indicated that the polymer did not ~ct ~nmarily as
`a barrier to penetration, but rather it helped to maintain the physical integrity of
`the stratum corneum preparation .
`.
`.
`Pretreatment of the stratum corneum of neonatal rats with Polyquat_ernium-
`10 slightly increased the hydration of the membrane and reduced swelling after
`surfactant exposure. 12
`2•>
`9
`23
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`ANIMAL TOXICOLOGY
`Oral Toxicity
`Three lots of Polyquaternium-10 were tested for acute oral toxicity by int~(cid:173)
`bation in rats. Three studies at maximum doses of 16 g/kg, 13.1 g/kg, 16 g/kg did
`not
`h ·
`th LO
`<25
`21 >
`ac ,eve e
`h
`00 and a con-
`0 .
`•
`50·
`.
`The acute oral toxicity of 1.0% Polyquatern1um-l
`1n a s amp.
`ditioner was tested by gavage. The LD5o of the two formulations was not
`reached at s g/kg. 12s.29 > Results are summarized in Table 2.
`
`

`

`f
`i
`
`1
`
`340
`
`COSM ETIC INGREDIENT REVIEW
`
`TABLE 2. Acu1e Oral Toxicily
`
`Compound
`
`No. of rats
`
`Vehicle
`
`Polyquaternium-1 0
`(lot 1J
`
`10
`
`Corn oil
`
`LO,.
`
`> 16 g/kg
`
`Polyquaternium-10
`(Loi 1l
`
`Polyqua1ernium· l 0
`(lot 2)
`
`Polyquaiernium-10
`(Loi 2)
`
`Polyquaiernrum-10
`(Loi 2)
`
`Polyquaternrum-10
`(Loi 3)
`
`3
`
`10
`
`10
`
`5
`
`5
`
`Water
`
`ot reached
`
`Corn orl
`
`13. 1 g/kg
`
`Corn oil
`
`'Jot reached
`
`Waler
`
`'sot reached
`
`Corn orl
`
`> 16.0 g/kg
`
`Comments
`
`Reference
`
`3/10 died; sluggish. wet
`fur and d iarrhea on
`one day; low order of
`1ox1city
`
`one dred: sluggish a1
`4 g/kg
`
`7/10 dred; sluggish. we1
`fur nose CO\ ered
`w11h blood on 1 day
`
`-.:one dred al 8 g/kg:
`appeared normal
`
`'Jone died at 2 g/kg
`appeared normal
`
`-.: one dred al 16.0 g/kg:
`" et tur and diarrhea
`al l day
`
`25
`
`25
`
`26
`
`26
`
`26
`
`r
`
`3
`
`\Valer
`
`'-one dred a1 4 g.kg
`Polyquaiernrum-10
`animal~ ~luggrsh
`(lot 3)
`----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`> 5 g/kg
`one dred· nontoxic
`28
`Polyquaternrum-10
`10
`Formula11on
`l °' .. in shampoo
`
`-..: 01 reached
`
`27
`
`Polyquaternrum-10
`1°' .. in condi-
`Ironer
`
`10
`
`Formula11on
`
`> 5 g/kg
`
`, one dred nontoxic
`
`29
`
`Inhalatio n Toxicity
`
`Inhalation tests of three lots of Polyquaternium-1 O were conducted using in(cid:173)
`dividual groups of 6 rats and an exposure period of 8 h. The rats were exposed
`to a substantial aerosol concentration that was p repared by placing 50 g of test
`material on a 200 cm 2 tray for 16 h before testing in a sealed chamber and dur·
`ing the 8-h exposure period . A fan was operated intermittently to agitate the in·
`ternal chamber atmosphere. o signs of toxicity were observed during the ex(cid:173)
`posure period. 1251
`
`Dermal Toxicity and Irritatio n
`Three lot samples of Polyquaternium-1 o were tested individually using thr~
`groups of 5 rabbits each. o deaths occurred when 4.0 g/kg was applied di(cid:173)
`rectly to the skin and the application site covered . Erytheme developed, but no
`~ther remarkable gross lesions were observed. The th ree lot samples were con·
`s1dered, at most, slightly toxic. 12s-21 1
`.
`Three lots of Polyquaternium-10 were tested o n the clipped uncovered in·
`tact skin of the abdomen of 5 rabbits at individ ual lot concentrations of 2%, S%,
`
`

`

`ASSESSMENT: POLYQUATERNIUM-10
`
`341
`
`a~d 10% (in water). At 2% concentration, no irritation was observed in 4 rab(cid:173)
`~1ts,_ and moderate ery~hema wa_s seen in 1 rabbit. At 5.0% concentration, no ir(cid:173)
`n~at1on was observed in 3 rabbits, and moderate erythema was seen in 2 rab(cid:173)
`bits. At 10% concen tration , no irritation was observed in 2 rabbits, and moder(cid:173)
`ate erythema was observed in 3 rabbits. The investigator termed the observed ir(cid:173)
`ritation a trace reaction . <2 5 - 27 1
`A shampoo con taining 0.5% Polyquaternium-10 had a primary irritation in(cid:173)
`dex (PII) of 5.37 (max . 8) in a study performed according to CFR Title 16:
`l 500.3(c)(4) and 1500.41. <301 The test used 12 rabbits, dosed at 0.5 ml of the
`shampoo, w ith 6 having intact ski n and 6 having abraded ski n. The shampoo
`was a severe skin irritant .<18 · 3 '
`'
`The dermal toxicity of a shampoo containing 0.5% Polyq uaternium-10 was
`evaluated according to the procedures in the CFR Title 16:1500.3(c)(l)(ii)(c) and
`1500.40. po, The product was tested on the clipped skin of 5 rabbits and 5 that
`were both clipped and abraded. The dermal LD50 of the formulation was greater
`than 2 g/kg. <28
`3
`' 1
`•
`A 21-day su bc hronic dermal toxicity study was conducted with a condi(cid:173)
`tioner contai ning 1 % Polyq uaternium-10. Five male and five female rabbits
`were given 0.5 m l undiluted product once a day for 21 consecutive days. The
`test material was ap plied to the clipped dorsal trunk of the rabbits, and the skin
`of 5 of 10 ani mal s was abraded before application of the test material. The test
`material rem ained in contact with the ski n 6 h daily, and sites were uncovered .
`A control group of 5 male and 5 female rabbits had tap water applied to intact
`and abraded skin. o rabbits died during the test period, both groups had nor(cid:173)
`mal weight gai ns, and no lesions were observed at necropsy. Initial and termin al
`hematological and urinalysis val ues were within normal range. The product was
`21
`not a cumulative dermal toxin. P
`Six ew Zealand rabbits were used to evaluate the primary skin irritation of
`a conditioner contai ning 1 % Pol yquaternium -10. One-half (~.5) millili~er of the
`test material was administered to 1 intact and 1 abraded test site per animal. The
`clipped test sites were covered by occlusive patches for 24 h, and test sites were
`sco red for irritation immediately after patch removal and 48 h later. The group
`PII was 0.0 (max . 8). The product was not a primary skin irritant< 291 (Table 3).
`
`Ocular Toxicity
`
`Three lots of Polyq uaternium-1 O were tested for ocular _toxicity, b_ot~ a_s a
`dry powder and as an aqueous solution using groups of 5 animals. o 1mtat1on
`was produced by the powder form of any lot. When applied as the aqueous
`solution, no irritation was produced by lot 1 at a 20% co nc~ntrat1on or ~Y lot 2
`at a 5% concentration. A trace of irritation was produced by lot 3 at a 10 Yo con-
`centration. <25- 27 >
`•
`•
`A shampoo conta ini ng 0.5% Polyquaternium-10 was tested for o~ular irrita-
`tion in two groups of 12 rabbits according to the pro~edures given in t~e ~FR
`Title 16: 1500.3(c)(4) and 1500.42.<3°'. One gr_ou~ received / ull~str~ngth instilla(cid:173)
`tions of the shampoo; a second received instillation of a 5 Yo. dil~tio_n. The e_y~s
`of half of the rabbits of each group were rinsed after product 1nstdlat1on . No 1m-
`
`

`

`..,
`~ ...,
`
`TABLE 3 . Dermal Toxicil y and lrrilalion
`
`Compound
`--
`Polyqualernium-10
`(LOI I )
`
`Polyq ualernium-10
`(LOI 2)
`
`Polyqualernium- 10
`(Loi 3)
`
`Polyq ualernium-10
`(Loi I)
`
`Polyquaternium-10
`(Lot 2)
`
`No. of rabb,rs
`
`Vehicle
`
`Concentration
`
`Method
`
`Results
`
`Reference
`
`5
`
`5
`
`5
`
`5
`
`5
`
`None
`
`4 g/kg
`
`Applied direclly 10 clipped inlacl
`skin, occluded for 24 h
`
`None
`
`4 g/kg
`
`Applied clireclly 10 clipped in1ac1
`skin, occluded for 24 h
`
`None
`
`4 g/kg
`
`Applied direc1 ly 10 clipped in1ac1
`sk,n, occluded for 24 h
`
`Waler
`
`2%
`
`Water
`
`5%
`
`0.01 ml applied 10 clipped in1ac1
`bellies for 24 h
`
`0 .01 ml applied to clopped 1n1act
`bellies for 24 h
`
`No deal hs; erylhema al 24 h;
`no remarkable gross palho-
`logical resuhs
`No deal hs; ery1hema al 24 h;
`no remarkable gross palho-
`logical resuhs
`No dealhs; erythema al 24 h;
`no remarkable gross palho-
`logical resu lls
`No orrilalion in 4; moderate
`capillary injection in 1
`rabbit
`
`No irritation in 3; moderate
`capillary injection in 2
`rabbits
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`25
`
`26
`
`Polyquaternium-10
`(l ot 3)
`
`5
`
`Water
`
`No irrilation in 2; moderate
`capilla ry injection in 3
`rabbits
`-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`--- ---
`Shampoo contain-
`12
`Dorec1
`1.0%
`( FR I 6: 1500.3(( )(4), I 500.4 I ;
`PII 5. 37 (max. 8); shampoo
`28, 3 I
`ing 1 .0% Poly-
`6 with intact and 6 with
`was classified as severe irri-
`q uaterniu m- 10
`abraded skin
`tant
`
`10% (suspen-
`soon)
`
`0.01 ml applied to clipped intact
`bellies for 24 h
`
`27
`
`Conditioner con-
`taining 1.0%
`Polyqua-
`iernium-10
`
`6
`
`Direct
`
`1.0%
`
`0.5 ml applied to each intact
`and abraded area; occluded
`for 24 h
`
`PII 0.0 (max. 8); conditioner
`was not skin irritant
`
`29
`
`(")
`0
`V>
`~
`m
`::::!
`(")
`z
`C'l
`,0
`m
`
`51 m z
`
`-f
`,0
`m
`!:
`i
`
`___ _
`
`.J
`
`

`

`ASSESSMENT: POLYQUATERNIUM-10
`
`343
`
`th h
`talion was observed in the eyes of any animal The full- t
`not an eye irritant. <3 • . JJ>
`s reng
`s ampoo was
`•
`t
`The ocular irritation or a conditioner containing 1 o, Pol

`z I
`.
`t d · 9 N
`yqua ern,um-lOwas
`I
`10
`eva ~a e_ in . ew ea and rabbits. One-tenth (0.1) milliliter of the test material
`was instilled into one eye of each rabbit and the other
`d
`.
`,
`eye serve as an un-
`I
`d
`treate contra . The eyes of 3 rabbits were rinsed 15 sec afte
`t·
`1·
`f h
`I
`r app ,ca 10n o t e

`· .
`.
`test so ut,on. No 1rrr~at1~n was observed in rinsed or unrinsed eyes 1, 2, 3, 4,
`and ~9~ays after appl1cat1on of the product. The conditioner was not an eye irri-
`tant.
`A summary of ocular test data is given in Table 4.
`
`MUTAGENICITY AND GENOTOXICITY
`
`Polyquaternium-10 was tested in triplicate and at five concentrations for
`mutagenic activity in the Salmonella typhimurium assay (Ames test) on TA-98,
`TA-100, TA-1535, TA-1537, and TA-1538 tester strains without and with meta(cid:173)
`bolic activation. The metabolic activation was induced with 59 liver homoge(cid:173)
`nate from male Sprague-Dawley rats pretreated with Aroclor 1254. In this
`setting, Polyquaternium-10 was not mutagenic in any of the five bacterial strains
`tested wit h and without metabolic activation. 1341
`Chi nese hamster ovary (CH O) cells were exposed for 5 h to five concentra(cid:173)
`tions of Polyquaternium-10 (0. 12-0.285% in DMSO) without and with addition
`of S9 liver homogenate for metabolic activation (as in the Ames assay). Although
`some degree of mu tagenicity was observed in both of the duplicate assays in the
`absence as well as in the presence of 59 homogenate, the response was not
`dose dependent. Polyquaternium-10 was thus considered to be nonmutagenic
`in the C HO test. In sister chromatid exchange (SCE) assays, Polyquaternium-10
`in CHO cells both with and without enzyme induction by 59 liver homogenate
`did not increase the frequency of SCE over the range of concentrations tested
`(0. 14-0.23%). ( J 4 )
`Polyquaternium-1 O was evaluated also for its genotoxic effect in the rat he(cid:173)
`patocyte primary culture/ DNA repair test in six concentrations between 0.~0~9
`and 0.23%. The results from duplicate samples indicate significant genotox rc~ty
`of this cosmetic ingredie nt at three of six doses. However, the measured activ(cid:173)
`ity, which was not dose dependent, was determined with hepatocytes from a
`si ngle preparation and quantitated by liquid scintillation counting rather ~han by
`the more reproducible quantitative autoradiography. 1341 The result~ of th,s_study
`do not allow a va lid conclusion about the activity of Polyquatern, um-10 rn he-
`patocyte DNA repair test.
`.
`. .
`.
`Polyquaternium-1 o was tested for its in vivo clastogenrc act1v1 ty rn f~male
`Swiss mice by injecting single doses of 0.125, 0.25, and 0.4 g/kg, respectively,
`into the peritoneal cavity of 5 males and 5 females. Blood samples were col(cid:173)
`lected 24, 48, and 72 h after the injection. Blood smears_ were prepared a~d
`stained for evaluating the possible presence of micro~~cler. No stat,st,cally sig(cid:173)
`nificant increases in micronucleated polychromatophrlrc eryth rocytes were re(cid:173)
`ported. 134 1
`
`

`

`TABLE 4. Ocular Toxicity
`
`Compound
`
`N o. o f rabbit s
`
`Vehicle
`
`Concentrat,on
`
`M ethod
`
`Results
`
`Reference
`
`Powder
`
`Direct
`
`Single instillation into conju nct,val sac
`
`No irrila tion
`
`5
`
`5
`
`5
`
`5
`
`5
`
`5
`
`Water
`
`2%
`
`Powder
`
`Direct
`
`W.iter
`
`5%
`
`Powder
`
`D irect
`
`Water
`
`10% (suspen(cid:173)
`; ,o n)
`
`0 .5 ml si ngle instill;ition into conjunc(cid:173)
`tiva! sac
`0 .5 ml single instill;, tion into conjunc(cid:173)
`tival sac
`0.5 ml single instillat,on ,nto con1unc(cid:173)
`t1val sac
`0 .5 ml single instillation into conjunc(cid:173)
`ltval sac
`0 .5 ml single 1nst1lla11on 11110 r onjunc(cid:173)
`tiva l sac
`
`Polyquaternium- 10
`(Lot 1)
`
`Polyquatern ium- 10
`(Lot I)
`Polyquaternium- 10
`(Lot 2)
`
`Polyquaternium- 10
`(Lot 2)
`
`Polyquaternium- 10
`(Lot 3)
`
`Polyquaternium- 10
`(Lot 3)
`
`Shampoo contain(cid:173)
`ing 0.5% Poly(cid:173)
`quaternium -10
`
`Conditioner con(cid:173)
`taining 1.0%
`Polyqua(cid:173)
`ternium-10
`
`12
`
`Direct and 5%
`dilutio n
`
`1.0 and
`0 .05%
`
`Cl R 16: I 500 .3(()(4) and I 500 .42; ha lf
`o f test eyes w ere rinsed
`
`9
`
`D irect
`
`0. 1 ml of
`conditioner
`
`Direct applicatio n, 3 eyes rinsed
`
`25
`
`25
`
`26
`
`26
`
`27
`
`27
`
`----- -·
`28, 3 1
`
`29
`
`No irritation
`
`N o irritation
`
`No orrotation
`
`No irritation
`
`Trace irritation
`in I eye,
`no ne in 4
`
`No irritation at
`either con-
`centration,
`rinsed or
`unronsed
`
`N o irritat ion,
`110 1 an eye
`irritant
`
`...,
`t
`
`("')
`0
`V>
`?
`m
`- j
`ri
`
`C)
`
`"' m
`0
`m z
`"' m
`~
`m
`~
`
`-j
`
`

`

`ASSESSMENT: PO L YQUA TERNIUM-1 0
`
`345
`
`CLINICAL ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY
`Primary Skin Irritation, Sensitization, and Photosensitization
`
`. A lot o! Polyquater~ iu~-10 was tested for ~rimary skin irritation on 106 sub(cid:173)
`Jects. A 5 ~o w/v solutio n in water was applied to the skin under occlusive
`~ate~~~ for ~8. h .. No skin irritation was observed at 48 and 72 h after applica(cid:173)
`tion. No 1mtat1on was observed when a 5% Polyquaternium-1 o solution was
`appl ied daily under occlusive conditions for 21 days to 27 subjects.<36>
`Three separate lots of Polyquaternium-10 were tested by a repeated insult
`p~tch test (RIP_T) p ro~oc_ol us_ing 50 su bjects. A 2% w/v sol ution in water was ap(cid:173)
`plied to the skin on lintine disks under occlusive patches for 24 h. The treatment
`r~action si tes .were scored at 24 h. Following a 24-h nontreatment period, the
`sites were again exposed to the test samples. A 2-week nontreatment period fol(cid:173)
`lowed the 15th application. The test sites were evaluated and then treated in a
`similar m anner and scored at 24 and 48 h. No evidence of either irritation or
`sensitization was observed in any subject w hen exposed to the three lot samples
`- 39>
`of Polyquatern iu m-1 O. <37
`There was no irritation or sensitization when a 5% w/v solution of Polyqua(cid:173)
`ternium-10 was used in an RIPT on 203 subjects. <•0 >
`A shampoo containing 0 .5% Polyquaterni um-10 was evaluated for primary
`irritation and sensi tization by a prophetic patch test <••> and an RIPT.<•2
`> One
`hundred subjects participated in the prophetic patch test, and no reactions were
`observed to either of the two closed patches applied. Fifty-three subjects com(cid:173)
`pleted the RI PT, and no reaction s were observed during induction or at chal(cid:173)
`lenge. Photosensitization also was evaluated in these two studies by exposu re of
`the sites to UV light during the induction phase of the RJPT stud y and during the
`chal lenge phase of the prophetic patch test. The undiluted shampoo was not a
`primary ski n irritant, sensitizer, or photosensitizerY '·43>
`The primary irritation , sensiti zation, and photosensitization of an undi luted
`sham poo contai ning 0 .5% Polyq uaternium-10 was evaluated in an RIPT accord(cid:173)
`ing to the procedu res of Shelanski and Shelanski<•2> using a 25-member panel.
`The UV light was applied during the induction phase of the stud y. Th.e s~ampoo
`was tested at full strength. The product was nonirritating, nonsens1t1zing, and
`nonphotosensitizing. <44
`>
`•
`Forty-six panelists partici pated in an RIPT of a condition in? product c~~tain(cid:173)
`ing 1 % Pol yq uaternium-10. Patches containing 0.2 ml undiluted cond1t1oner
`were applied to the inner arm or back of each subject on Mondays, Wednes(cid:173)
`days, and Fridays for a total of 10 induction patches. After a 10-20 day nontreat(cid:173)
`ment period, two chal lenge patches were applied simultaneo~sly, one '.o. the
`origi nal test site and the other to an untreated site. One panelist had minim.al
`erythema (score of ± on a 0-4 scale) to induction patch 9, and another panelist
`had a ± reaction to induction patch 10. Two panelists reacted at challenge; 1

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket