throbber
Biochem. J. (1977) 163, 449453
`Printed in Great Britain
`
`449
`
`Presence of a High-Molecular-Weight Form of Catalase in Enzyme
`Purified from Mouse Liver
`
`By MALCOLM B. BAIRD, HAROLD R. MASSIE and LINDA S. BIRNBAUM
`Masonic Medical Research Laboratory, 2150 Bleecker Street, Utica, NY 13503, U.S.A.
`
`(Received 16 November 1976)
`
`Ultracentrifugation studies of purified mouse hepatic catalase revealed that 5-7% of
`the total material consists of a form with a higher molecular weight than the bulk of the
`catalase. The two components were separated by sucrose-gradient centrifugation.
`Polyacrylamide-gel
`electrophoresis
`buffer)
`high-
`(in
`demonstrated
`that
`borate
`molecular-weight catalase is enriched in a more slowly migrating component, and
`sodium dodecyl sulphate/polyacrylamide gel-electrophoresis demonstrated that the
`molecular weight of the subunits of the high-molecular-weight material is identical with
`that of the subunits of the major form. These results suggest that high-molecular-weight
`catalase consists of subunits that are not markedly distinct from those present in the
`normal catalase tetramer.
`
`Catalase (EC 1.11.1.6) is a ubiquitous enzyme
`found in most tissues of aerobic organisms (de Duve
`& Baudhuin, 1966; Deisseroth & Dounce, 1970).
`The exact role of catalase within intact organisms
`remains obscure, although recent results strongly
`support the argument that a relationship exists
`between hepatic catalase activity and lipid meta-
`bolism (Reddy & Krishnakantha, 1975).
`Much is known about both the physical and chemi-
`cal properties of catalases from a variety of sources
`(Deisseroth & Dounce, 1970). The native enzyme is
`a slightly ellipsoidal protein, consisting of four
`polypeptide chains (Schroeder etal., 1969), each chain
`binding one molecule of protohaematin (Greenfield
`& Price, 1956). The molecular weights of several
`mammalian catalases have been tabulated, and range
`from 230000 to 250000 (Deisseroth & Dounce,
`1970).
`We have been interested in the possible role of
`catalase, as well as that of its substrate, H202, in
`senescence (Baird & Samis, 1971; Nicolosi et al.,
`1972; Samis et al., 1972; Baird et al., 1974, 1976;
`Massie & Baird, 1976). During the course of these
`studies hepatic catalase was purified from mouse
`liver, and examined by a variety of methods. In
`the present paper we give evidence that an active
`catalase molecule of higher than normal molecular
`weight exists in enzyme preparations purified from
`mouse liver.
`Vol. 163
`
`Experimental
`Materials
`C57B1/6J male mice (2 months old) were used
`throughout the study, and were maintained as
`described previously (Baird & Samis, 1971). SDS*
`(electrophoresis purity) was purchased from Bio-
`Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA, U.S.A. Benzidine
`and Coomassie Blue were purchased from Sigma,
`St. Louis, MO, U.S.A. All other reagents and
`materials were of the best grade available.
`Methods
`Animals were killed at 09:00h EST. Livers were
`excised and pooled and catalase was purified by the
`method of Price et al. (1962). Catalase activity was
`assayed by a spectrophotometric method essentially
`as previously described (Baird & Samis, 1971).
`Sedimentation-velocity determinations were per-
`formed with a Beckman model E ultracentrifuge.
`Purified catalase was applied to 5-15% (w/v)
`sucrose (in water) gradients and centrifuged in a
`Beckman L5-40 ultracentrifuge. Pertinent details
`of these and other methods are given in the appro-
`priate Figure legends.
`electrophoresis of catalase
`Polyacrylamide-gel
`was performed in borate:buffer as described by
`Baird et al. (1976), or in 0.1 % SDS as described in
`detail by Welton & Aust (1974). Peroxidatic activity
`* Abbreviation: SDS, sodium dodecyl sulphate.
`
`Dexcom Inc. v. WaveForm Technologies, Inc.
`IPR2017-01051
`Exhibit 1019
`
`

`

`430
`
`M. 13. BAIRD, HI. R. MASSIE AND L. S. 7BIRNBAUMI
`
`of material on the gels was detected by staining with
`benzidine (Welton & Aust, 1974). Benzidine was
`handled with extreme caution as it is known to be
`carcinogenic in mammalian systems. The peroxidase-
`stained gels were scanned at 615nm in a linear gel
`transport with a Gilford 2400S spectrophotometer.
`We have found that such stains are stable when the
`gels are rinsed in water immediately after the
`appearance of the blue colour. Duplicate gels were
`stained for protein with Coomassie Blue (Fairbanks
`et al., 1971) and scanned at 550nm. Reference
`standards (with molecular weights in parentheses)
`were as follows: phosphorylase a (94000); bovine
`serum albumin (66500); pyruvate kinase (57000);
`aldolase (40000); lactate dehydrogenase (36000);
`lysozyme (14300); cytochrome c (11700).
`
`Results and Discussion
`The u.v.-visible spectrum of purified mouse liver
`catalase is presented in Fig. 1. We estimated that this
`material was greater than 99% pure (A407/A276 1.14),
`assuming that the criteria for purity of rat liver
`
`0.6r
`0.5
`0.4
`0.3-
`0.2h
`0 I0
`
`'1
`
`50k
`
`1000
`
`I0
`104x Molecular weight
`Fig. 3. Relationship between s2O,W and molecular weightfor
`purified mammalian catalases and subunits of catalase
`generated by various treatments
`Data were taken from Deisseroth & Dounce (1970).
`The stars (*) represent the s value for high-molecular-
`weight catalase and normal mouse liver catalase.
`
`I.0
`
`> 0
`
`.4.I
`cd
`
`.6
`
`1. 4
`
`0
`
`I .c
`
`0.8
`
`0.6
`
`0.41
`
`0.21
`
`0
`
`0
`
`200
`
`300
`500
`600
`400
`Wavelength (nm)
`Fig. 1. U.v.-visible scan ofpurified nmuse hepatic catalase
`Protein concentration was 300,ug/ml in 0.02M-sodium
`phosphate buffer, pH7.0.
`
`700
`
`800
`
`(a)
`
`(b)
`
`(c)
`
`g
`Fig. 2. Tracings of representative scans ofpurified mouse
`hepatic catalase after (a) 16, (b) 26 and (c) 36min of
`centrifugation in a Beckman model E ultracentrifuge
`Samples were centrifuged at 56000rev./min in 0.02M-
`sodium phosphate buffer, pH6.8, and scanned at
`407nm. Protein concentration was 520pg/ml. Direc-
`tion of force is represented by g.
`
`Fraction no.
`Fig. 4. Sucrose-density-gradient centrifugation of mouse
`hepatic catalase
`Purified catalase (O.1 ml, 4.55mg/ml) was applied to
`a 5-15%/ (w/v) sucrose gradient. The material was
`centrifuged for 7.5h, at 40000rev./min, in a 50.1
`rotor in a Beckman L540 ultracentrifuge. Fractions
`(10 drops) were collected and 0.1 ml of 0.02M-sodium
`phosphate buffer, pH6.8, was added to each
`fraction, and the
`fractions were analysed for
`A407 (m) and total units of catalatic activity (A).
`
`catalase established by Price et al. (1962) are
`applicable to mouse catalase.
`Centrifugation of this material in the model E
`ultracentrifuge (0.8A unit) revealed the presence of
`1977
`
`Dexcom Inc. v. WaveForm Technologies, Inc.
`IPR2017-01051
`Exhibit 1019
`
`

`

`HIGH-MOLECULAR-WEIGHT CATALASE
`
`451
`
`0.4
`
`(a)
`
`0.3
`
`0.2
`
`0. l
`
`o
`
`(b)
`
`0.5 _
`
`l.
`
`}
`
`I
`
`\
`
`0.4
`
`0.3
`
`0.2
`
`0.1
`
`o
`
`0.2 (c-
`
`0.
`
`0
`
`Vol. 163
`
`IT
`
`I
`
`1
`
`3
`2
`Distance (cm)
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`two components (Fig. 2). The major component
`had s20,w 11.1S, and the minor component had
`520ow 14.8S. The minor component accounted for
`5-7% of the total material.
`We have plotted (Fig. 3) the data collected by
`Deisseroth & Dounce (1970) relating corrected s
`values and molecular weights of native catalases as
`well as for subunits of catalase. We estimated by
`extrapolation that the molecular weight of the major
`component of mouse hepatic catalase was 235000,
`and that of the high-molecular-weight catalase was
`345000. This value, of course, assumes certain
`similarities between the two catalase molecules, and
`may be in error.
`The two components were readily separated on a
`sucrose gradient (Fig. 4), in terms of both A407 and
`catalatic activity. Since the ratio between the absorb-
`ance of the Soret band (407nm) and that of the pro-
`tein band (276nm) in purified mouse hepatic catalase
`is nearly unity (Fig. 1), the A407 is a useful estimate
`content. We determined from the
`of protein
`results of numerous sucrose gradients that
`the
`specificenzyme activity (enzyme activity/A407) of both
`the major form ofcatalase and high-molecular-weight
`catalase is identical. Therefore we suggest that the
`haematin content of both forms is similar, although
`we have not directly measured the haematin content
`of high-molecular-weight catalase.
`Purified enzyme, as well as the material under the
`l ltwo peaks resolved by centrifugation (Fig. 4), were
`subjected to both SDS/polyacrylamide-gel electro-
`phoresis and gel electrophoresis in borate buffer.
`Separation of the purified material on the basis of
`size and charge (borate buffer) revealed the presence
`of two components with peroxidatic activity (Fig. 5a).
`Electrophoresis of the material under the two peaks
`resolved on a sucrose gradient demonstrated that the
`material under the major peak (Fig. 5b) corresponds
`to the more rapidly migrating material in the purified
`catalase, and the material in the minor peak is en-
`riched in more slowly migrating material (Fig. 5c).
`Separation of the material in the purified catalase,
`as well as the material in both peaks in the presence of
`0.1% SDS, reveals the presence of two components
`(Fig. 6). The more rapidly migrating component
`has mol.wt. 60000 and the more slowly migrating
`minor component has mol.wt. 120000. We suggest
`that the 120000-mol.wt. component is a contaminant,
`
`Fig. 5. Non-dissociating polyacrylamide-gel electrophoresis
`ofpurified mouse hepatic catalase activity before and after
`fractionation on a sucrose gradient
`Origin of the run was at the cathode (0). Gels were
`stained for peroxidatic activity with benzidine.
`(b) major component (see
`(a) Purified catalase;
`Fig. 3); (c) high-molecular-weight catalase (more
`rapidly sedimenting component, see Fig. 3).
`
`Dexcom Inc. v. WaveForm Technologies, Inc.
`IPR2017-01051
`Exhibit 1019
`
`

`

`452
`
`M. B. BAIRD, H. R. MASSIE AND L. S. BIRNBAUM
`
`(a)
`
`3.6
`
`3.2
`
`2.8
`
`2.4
`
`2.0
`
`1.6
`
`1.2
`
`0.8
`
`0.40c
`
`I_
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`° 3.2 -
`
`(b)
`
`2.8-
`
`2.4-
`
`-2.0-
`
`1.6
`
`1.2-
`
`0.8
`
`0.4
`
`0.4
`
`(c
`
`0
`
`2
`
`6
`4
`Distance (cm)
`
`8
`
`10
`
`inasmuch as it does not possess any detectable
`peroxidatic activity. Therefore high-molecular-weight
`catalase appears to consist of subunits that are
`identical with those present in normal tetrameric
`catalase.
`We have not determined whether high-molecular-
`weight catalase possesses some function in vivo, or
`is generated during the purification process. There are
`conditions under which ox liver catalase aggregates
`into higher-molecular-weight species (Itoh et al.,
`1962). However, spontaneous aggregation into high-
`molecular-weight catalase most likely does not occur,
`as identical electrophoretic results are obtained
`whether performed in the presence or absence of di-
`material,
`dilution of the
`thiothreitol.
`Further,
`followed by ultracentrifugation, does not alter the
`percentage of the total material accounted for by
`high-molecular-weight catalase. Finally, high-mole-
`cular-weight catalase is not present in catalase pre-
`parations purified from CFN rat liver.
`Other studies from our laboratory (Baird et al.,
`1976) indicate that the response of mouse liver
`catalase activity to the pharmacological agent allyl-
`isopropylacetamide is different from that observed
`in rats. High-molecular-weight catalase appears to
`be another anomalous feature ofmouse liver catalase.
`
`This research was supported by the Masonic Founda-
`tion for Medical Research.
`
`References
`Baird, M. B. & Samis, H. V., Jr. (1971) Gerontologia 17,
`105-115
`Baird, M. B., Zimmerman, J. A., Massie, H. R. & Samis,
`H. V. (1974) Gerontologia 20, 169-178
`Baird, M. B., Samis, H. V., Massie, H. R., Zimmerman,
`J. A. & Sfeir, G. A. (1976) Biochem. Pharmacol. 25,
`1101-1105
`de Duve, C. & Baudhuin, P. (1966) Physiol. Rev. 46,
`323-357
`Deisseroth, A. & Dounce, A. L. (1970) Physiol. Rev. 50,
`319-375
`Fairbanks, G., Steck, T. L. & Wallach, D. F. H. (1971)
`Biochemistry 10, 2606-2616
`Greenfield, R. E. & Price, V. E. (1956) J. Biol. Chem.
`220, 607-617
`Itoh, M., Nakamura, Y. & Shibata, K. (1962) Can. J.
`Biochem. Physiol. 40, 1327-1334
`
`Fig. 6. SDS/polyacrylamide-gel electrophoresis ofpurified
`mouse hepatic catalase before and after fractionation on
`a sucrose gradient
`Origin of the run was at the cathode (0). Gels were
`stained with Coomassie Blue. (a) Purified catalase;
`(b) major component (see Fig. 3); (c) high-molecular-
`weight catalase (more rapidly sedimenting com-
`ponent, see Fig. 3).
`
`1977
`
`Dexcom Inc. v. WaveForm Technologies, Inc.
`IPR2017-01051
`Exhibit 1019
`
`

`

`HIGH-MOLECULAR-WEIGHT CATALASE
`
`453
`
`Massie, H. R. & Baird, M. B. (1976) Mech. Ageing Dev. 5,
`39-43
`Nicolosi, R. J., Baird, M. B., Massie, H. R. & Samis,
`H. V. (1972) Exp. Gerontol. 8, 101-108
`Price, V. E., Sterling, W. R., Tarantola, V. A., Hartley,
`R. W., Jr. & Rechcigl, M., Jr. (1962) J. Biol. Chem.
`237, 3468-3478
`Reddy, J. K. & Krishnakantha, T. P. (1975) Science 190,
`787-789
`
`Samis, H. V., Baird, M. B. & Massie, H. R. (1972) in
`Molecular Genetic Mechanisms in Development and
`Aging (Rockstein, M. & Baker, G., eds.), pp. 133-143,
`Academic Press, New York
`Schroeder, W. A., Shelton, J. P., Shelton, J. B. & Olsen,
`B. M. (1969) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 131, 653-655
`Welton, A. F. & Aust, S. D. (1974) Biochem. Biophys. Res.
`Commun. 56, 898-906
`
`Vol. 163
`
`Dexcom Inc. v. WaveForm Technologies, Inc.
`IPR2017-01051
`Exhibit 1019
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket