throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`___________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`___________
`
`KAWASAKI RAIL CAR, INC.,
`
`Petitioner,

`
`v.

`
`SCOTT BLAIR,

`
`Patent Owner
`__________
`
`Case IPR2017-01036
`
`Patent 6,700,602
`
`DECLARATION OF DARIUSH KEYHANI IN SUPPORT OF PATENT OWNER’S
`MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`
`

`

`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), I, Dariush Keyhani, do hereby apply for pro hac vice
`
`admission to appear before the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board on behalf of Patent Owner
`
`Scott Blair in the above-titled action.
`
`In support of this application, I certify the following under oath:
`
`1.
`
`I am a member of the law firm of Meredith & Keyhani, PLLC. My name, office
`
`address, and telephone number are as follows:
`
`Dariush Keyhani
`Meredith & Keyhani, PLLC
`125 Park Avenue, 25th Floor
`New York, New York 10017
`Tel. (212) 760-0098
`
`2.
`
`I have been admitted to the following courts and bars:
`
`Supreme Court of New Jersey (12/28/2002) (NJ Bar No. 0440622002)
`District of Columbia (4/11/2016)(D.C. Bar No. 1031500)
`United States District Court for New Jersey (2/3/2003)
`United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (1/20/2004)
`United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (1/20/2004)
`United States District Court for the Western District of New York (10/22/2004)
`Second Circuit Court of Appeals (3/28/2012)
`Federal Circuit Court of Appeals (8/7/2013)
`
`3.
`
`I am an experienced patent litigation and trial attorney.
`
`I have practiced patent
`
`litigation for almost 15 years. During this period, I have served as lead litigation and trial counsel
`
`in over two dozen patent infringement. In almost all of these cases the validity of the patents was
`
`the subject of a claim and/or an affirmative defense.
`
`4.
`
`I am the lead litigation and trial counsel representing Scott Blair in parallel
`
`proceedings in federal district court for infringement U.S. Patent No. 6,700,602 (‘602 Patent,
`
`“Subway TV Media System”) and also defending the validity of the claims in connection with
`
`claims of invalidity brought by Kawasaki Rail Car, Inc. For over one and a half years, I have been
`
`preparing and prosecuting this case and have been in charge of overseeing all substantive issues
`
`2
`
`

`

`relating to infringement and validity of the patent. During this time, I have worked closely with
`
`the inventor to learn his invention disclosed in the ‘602 Patent and I have carefully studied the
`
`specification and claims of the ‘602 Patent. I have also carefully reviewed in detail all filings by
`
`the Petitioner and Patent Owner in connection with this IPR. I have also worked with two separate
`
`technical experts in understanding and learning the invention disclosed and claimed in the ‘602
`
`Patent. Additionally, I have worked closely and extensively with patent co-counsel Jennifer
`
`Meredith, who is also an engineer.
`
`I am regularly admitted pro hac vice in federal courts throughout the United States.
`
`I am currently in good standing with all states, courts, and bars in which I am
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`admitted.
`
`7.
`
`I have never been suspended or disbarred from practice before any court or
`
`administrative body.
`
`8.
`
`None of my applications for admission to practice before any court or
`
`administrative body has ever been denied.
`
`9.
`
`No sanctions or contempt citations have ever been imposed against me by any court
`
`or administrative body.
`
`10.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the
`
`Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of 37 C.F.R.
`
`11.
`
`I understand that I will be subject to the Office’s Rules of Professional Conduct set
`
`forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a) (Id. ¶
`
`9).
`
`3
`
`

`

`12.
`
`I have never applied for pro hac vice admission before the Board. I am applying
`
`for pro hac vice at the same time as the within application in a related matter (IPR Case IPR2017-
`
`00117).
`
`13.
`
`Lead counsel with whom I am associated in this matter is Jennifer Meredith, a
`
`registered practitioner (Reg. No. 47,790). She is an active member in good standing with the New
`
`York and Texas State Bars and is admitted before the United States Patent and Trademark Office,
`
`Southern District of New York, Eastern District of New York, Northern District of New York, and
`
`Western District of New York. Her office is located at 205 Main Street East Aurora, NY 14052.
`
`Her office phone number is (212) 760-0098.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed in East
`
`Aurora, New York, this 3rd day of November 2017. Dated this this 3rd day of November 2017.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Dariush Keyhani
`Dariush Keyhani (DK-9673)
`Meredith & Keyhani, PLLC
`125 Park Avenue, 25th Floor
`New York, New York 10017
`Tel. (212) 760-0098
`Fax (212) 202-3819
`dkeyhani@meredithkeyhani.com
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket