throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`KAWASAKI RAIL CAR, INC.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SCOTT BLAIR,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2017-01036
`
`Patent No. 6,700,602
`
`Issue Date: March 2, 2004
`
`Title: Subway TV Media System
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S OBJECTIONS TO
`PATENT OWNER’S EXHIBITS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1), Petitioner Kawasaki Rail Car, Inc.
`
`submits the following objections to Exhibits 2005-2008 submitted by Patent
`
`Owner Scott Blair, and any reference to or reliance on the foregoing. As required
`
`by 37 C.F.R § 42.62, Petitioner’s objections below apply the Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence.
`
`I.
`
`OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBIT 2005
`
`Petitioner objects to Exhibit 2005 because Patent Owner has not produced
`
`admissible evidence to authenticate the Exhibit as required under Fed. R. Evid.
`
`901(a) and has not produced admissible evidence to establish that this Exhibit is
`
`self-authenticating under Fed. R. Evid. 902.
`
`Petitioner further objects to Exhibit 2005 under Fed. R. Evid. 802 as
`
`constituting inadmissible hearsay for which no exception has been established to
`
`the extent it is offered by Patent Owner to prove the truth of any matter asserted
`
`therein, e.g., “TV sets are provided with ventilation openings in the cabinet to
`
`allow heat generated during the operation to be released. If these openings are
`
`blocked, heat build-up within the TV can cause failures which may result in a fire
`
`hazard.” Exhibit 2005 is irrelevant for any non-hearsay purpose.
`
`Additionally, Petitioner objects to Exhibit 2005 as irrelevant to this
`
`proceeding pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 401, and, therefore, as inadmissible under
`
`Fed. R. Evid. 402 or Fed. R. Evid. 403.
`
`- 1 -
`
`

`

`
`
`II. OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBIT 2006
`
`Petitioner objects to Exhibit 2006 because Patent Owner has not produced
`
`admissible evidence to establish that Mr. Jack R. Long is a qualified expert under
`
`Fed. R. Evid. 702. In particular, Patent Owner has failed to establish that Mr. Long
`
`has the knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education to testify as to the
`
`subject matter of paragraphs 15, 18, 25-28, and 34 of Exhibit 2006.
`
`Petitioner also objects to paragraphs 15, 18, 25-28, and 34 of Exhibit 2006 to
`
`the extent they are based on inadmissible Exhibit 2005, because such testimony is
`
`irrelevant pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 401, and, therefore, inadmissible under Fed. R.
`
`Evid. 402 or Fed. R. Evid. 403, and because, under Fed. R. Evid. 802, the
`
`testimony is inadmissible hearsay for which no exception has been established to
`
`the extent it is offered by Patent Owner to prove the truth of any matter asserted
`
`therein.
`
`III. OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBIT 2007
`
`Petitioner objects to Exhibit 2007 because Patent Owner has not produced
`
`admissible evidence to establish that Mr. Joseph B. Zicherman is a qualified expert
`
`under Fed. R. Evid. 702. In particular, Patent Owner has failed to establish that
`
`Mr. Zicherman has the knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education to
`
`testify as to the subject matter of paragraphs 16, 17, and 19-24 of Exhibit 2007.
`
`Petitioner also objects to paragraphs 12, 13, 15, 18, and 25-34 of Exhibit
`
`- 2 -
`
`

`

`
`
`2007 to the extent they are based on inadmissible Exhibit 2005, because such
`
`testimony is irrelevant pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 401, and, therefore, inadmissible
`
`under Fed. R. Evid. 402 or Fed. R. Evid. 403, and because, under Fed. R. Evid.
`
`802, the testimony included in these paragraphs is inadmissible hearsay for which
`
`no exception has been established to the extent it is offered by Patent Owner to
`
`prove the truth of any matter asserted therein.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`

`

`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that on December 11, 2017, a complete and entire
`
`copy of this PETITIONER’S OBJECTIONS TO PATENT OWNER’S
`
`EXHIBITS were served via Federal Express and e-mail on the following:
`
`Jennifer Meredith
`jmeredith@meredithkeyhani.com
`205 Main Street
`East Aurora, New York 14052
`Tel: (212) 760-0098
`Fax: (212) 202-3819
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Armin Ghiam
`
`Armin Ghiam
`ANDREWS KURTH KENYON LLP
`One Broadway
`New York, NY 10004
`Telephone: (212) 425-7200
`
`
`- 4 -
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket