throbber
ELSEVIER (cid:9)
`
`International Journal of Pharmaceutics 157 (1997) 43-52
`
`international
`journal of
`pharmaceutics
`
`Design of sustained-release matrix systems for a highly
`water-soluble compound, ABT-089
`
`Yihong Qiu *, Kolette Flood, Kennan Marsh, Sherry Carroll, Jay Trivedi,
`Stephen P. Arneric, Steven L. Krill
`
`Pharmaceutical Products Division, Abbott Laboratories, 100 Abbott Park Rd., Abbott Park, IL 60064-3500, USA
`
`Received 28 April 1997; received in revised form 27 June 1997; accepted 2 July 1997
`
`Abstract
`
`ABT-089 is a potent cholinergic channel modulator under investigation for treatment of cognitive disorders. It is
`a highly water soluble compound with a short elimination half-life of 1.7 h in dogs. Hydrophilic and hydrophobic
`matrix systems were designed to investigate the feasibility of prolonged oral delivery of ABT-089 and to explore the
`preliminary in vitro and in vivo correlations. The sustained-release single and layered matrix tablets were prepared by
`compression. In vitro release testing using a USP apparatus II was performed for formulation screening. The release
`rates were modulated by varying concentrations of different types of rate controlling materials and by restricting
`surface area available for drug release. The transport mechanism of the compound from different types of systems
`typically followed Fickian diffusion. Based on the in vitro release characteristics, two types of prototype matrix
`systems were evaluated in beagle dogs. Both formulations provided prolonged plasma levels of ABT-089 above the
`minimum effective concentration for over 22 h with reduced fluctuation of plasma levels. In vivo drug release from
`the tablet matrix estimated by deconvolution correlated well with drug release in vitro. In conclusion, prolonged oral
`delivery of highly soluble ABT-089 was achieved using diffusion controlled matrix systems. The hydrophobic matrix
`was found to be more effective than hydrophilic matrix in extending the release of the compound. Linear relationships
`between in vitro and in vivo drug release indicated by the initial results for both types of systems can provide useful
`information for further formulation development. © 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.
`
`Keywords: Cholinergic channel modulator; Sustained-release; Matrix system; In vitro release; Deconvolution; In
`vitro/in vivo correlation
`
`* Corresponding author. Abbott Laboratories, Formulation Development Center, D-4P7/R1B, 1401 N. Sheridan Rd., North
`Chicago, IL 60064, USA. Tel: + 1 847 9385220; fax: + 1 847 9351997; e-mail: yihong.qiu@abbott.com
`
`0378-5173/97/$17.00 © 1997 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
`PH S0378-5173(97)00215-9
`
`MYLAN Ex 1045, Page 1
`
`

`

`44 (cid:9)
`
`Y. Qiu et al. /International Journal of Pharmaceutics 157 (1997) 43-52
`
`1. Introduction
`
`[2-methy1-3-(2-(S)-pyrrolidinyl-
`ABT-089, (cid:9)
`methoxy)pyridine], is a potent and selective
`cholinergic channel modulator which is under in-
`vestigation for treatment of cognitive disorders
`(Williams and Arneric, 1996) (Fig. 1). Unlike
`(-)-nicotine, ABT-089 is substantially orally avail-
`able and has a reduced activation of human gan-
`glionic nicotinic receptors. Hence, it has a reduced
`propensity to elicit cardiac arrhythmias at high
`doses (Arneric et al., 1996). The compound is
`crystalline and thermally stable both in solution
`and in the solid state. ABT-089 is very soluble in
`aqueous media at pH values between 1-14 ( > 6
`g/ml). However, it is eliminated rapidly in vivo
`with a t1/2 of 1.7 h in dogs (Arneric et al., submit-
`ted). Multiple dosing is necessary to maintain
`plasma concentrations above minimum effective
`concentration (MEC) of 2 ng/ml (Arneric et al.,
`1996). In addition, preliminary studies have
`shown that prolonged exposure to ABT-089 with
`a reduced peak-to-trough ratio is therapeutically
`beneficial in selected animal models. Therefore, a
`sustained-release formulation which could be
`given once daily should be advantageous.
`In the present study, various matrix systems of
`ABT-089 were designed and tested for sustained
`release of ABT-089. The objectives of the study
`were (1) to investigate the feasibility of prolonged
`oral delivery of ABT-089, (2) to evaluate the
`performance of hydrophilic and hydrophobic ma-
`trix systems in retarding the release of this highly
`soluble compound, (3) to explore the preliminary
`relationship between in vitro and in vivo drug
`release from the matrix systems to facilitate fur-
`ther formulation development.
`
`2. Experimental section
`
`2.1. Materials and equipment
`
`The following materials were used in the study:
`ABT-089 • 2 HCl (Pharmaceutical Products Divi-
`sion, Abbott Laboratories) (Lin et al., 1997); Hy-
`droxypropyl methylcellulose, Methocel KlOOM
`(Dow Chemical Co.); Poly(ethyleneoxide),
`
`Polyox® coagulant (Union Carbide Co.); Car-
`nauba wax (J.W. Hanson Co., Inc.); Partially
`hydrogenated cottonseed oil, Stereotex K (Abitec
`Co.). All other chemicals and reagents were either
`AR or HPLC grades and used as received. A
`Vanderkamp® 600 dissolution tester and a
`HP8452A UV—VIS diode array spectrophotome-
`ter were used to determine the in vitro drug
`release. An HPLC system consisted of an Applied
`Biosystems 400 isocratic pump, an ABI 491 high-
`pressure dynamic mixer, a Hitachi 655A-40 au-
`tosampler and a Shimadzu RE-551 fluorescence
`detector with a Beckman PeakPro data collection
`system.
`
`2.2. Formulations
`
`2.2.1. Hydrophilic matrix system
`High viscosity grade hydroxypropyl methylcel-
`lulose (HPMC) and poly(ethyleneoxide) were used
`to prepare single and/or layered matrix tablets by
`direct compression using a Carver hydraulic press.
`Their compositions are described in Table 1.
`
`2.2.1.1. Single tablet. ABT-089 .2 HC1 was dry
`mixed with the polymer and other excipients. The
`blend was directly compressed into a 300-mg
`tablet using a concave punch at 4000 lb with a
`dwell time of 5 s.
`
`2.2.1.2. Layered tablet. Two types of layered
`tablets were designed, i.e. the hydrophilic matrix
`containing the drug is coated with hydrophilic
`barriers on both faces of the tablet by compres-
`sion (HHH) and the hydrophilic matrix contain-
`ing the drug is coated with hydrophobic barriers
`on both faces of the tablet by compression
`(WHW). Ingredients of the middle and barrier
`
`C11H16N20, MW = 192.28
`
`Fig. 1. Chemical structure of ABT-089.
`
`MYLAN Ex 1045, Page 2
`
`

`

`Y. Qiu et al. /International Journal of Pharmaceutics 157 (1997)
`
`43-52
`
`45
`
`Table 1
`Hydrophilic matrix system components
`
`Dosage form
`
`Single tablet (cid:9)
`
`Layered tablet
`
`Label
`
`H1
`
`H2 (cid:9) HHH
`
`WHW
`
`Top layera Middle layer
`
`Bottom layera Top layerb Middle layer
`
`Bottom layerb
`
`ABT-
`089.2 HC1
`(%)
`Methocel®
`K100M (%)
`Polyox® coagu-
`lant (%)
`Carnauba wax
`(%)
`Lactose anhy-
`drous (%)
`
`10
`
`26
`
`10
`
`51.8
`
`— (cid:9)
`
`54.5
`
`35.0
`
`54.5
`
`25
`
`51.8
`
`35.0
`
`10
`
`90
`
`10
`
`90
`
`64
`
`65 (cid:9)
`
`45.5
`
`13.2
`
`45.5
`
`13.2
`
`Total (mg)
`
`300
`
`300 (cid:9)
`
`110
`
`80
`
`110
`
`110
`
`80
`
`110
`
`aHydrophilic barrier layer.
`bHydrophobic barrier layer.
`
`layers were blended separately. Layered matrix
`tablets were prepared by compressing the barrier
`layer at 300 lb followed by middle layer at 300 lb
`and another barrier layer at 4500 lb using a
`flat-faced punch with a dwell time of 5 s.
`
`2.2.2. Hydrophobic matrix system
`Carnauba wax (W1 —W3) and partially hydro-
`genated cottonseed oil (W4—W7) were used as the
`rate controlling materials to prepare hydrophobic
`matrix tablets by compression using a Carver
`press. The formulations of the matrices are listed
`in Table 2. Drug and other excipients were
`blended and slowly added to molten wax at —
`95°C and mixed thoroughly. The mixture was
`allowed to congeal at room temperature while
`
`Table 2
`Hydrophobic matrix system components
`
`mixing. The congealed solids were milled and
`passed through a 30 mesh screen. The tablets were
`prepared with a concave punch by compressing at
`4500 lb with a dwell time of 5 s. The chemical
`stability of ABT-089 (m.p., 210°C) in the formula-
`tion was confirmed by potency assay.
`
`2.3. In vitro release
`
`The in vitro release tests were performed using
`the USP apparatus II (paddle method). The disso-
`lution medium was 900 ml of distilled water main-
`tained at 37 ± 0.5°C. The paddle rotation speed
`was kept at 100 rev./min. Water was used as the
`initial dissolution medium because of extremely
`high solubility of ABT-089 at different pH. In all
`
`Formulation
`
`ABT-089 2 HC1 (%)
`Carnauba wax (%)
`Sterotex K wax (%)
`Lactose anhydrous (%)
`
`Total (mg)
`
`W1
`
`13.8
`60
`
`26.2
`
`300
`
`W2
`
`13.8
`55
`
`31.2
`
`300
`
`W3
`
`13.8
`50
`
`36.2
`
`300
`
`W4
`
`13.8
`
`55
`31.2
`
`300
`
`W5
`
`13.8
`
`51
`35.2
`
`300
`
`W6
`
`13.8
`
`48
`38.2
`
`300
`
`W7
`
`13.8
`
`40
`46.2
`
`300
`
`MYLAN Ex 1045, Page 3
`
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`

`

`46 (cid:9)
`
`Y. Qiu et al. /International Journal of Pharmaceutics 157 (1997) 43-52
`
`Fractional Release
`
`Fig. 2. In vitro release profiles of different types of hydrophilic matrices of ABT-089 containing [ x ] 26% Methocel K100M (H1);
`[q
`] 25% Polyox coagulant (H2); [+] 35% Methocel K100M with hydrophilic barrier layers (HHH) and [0] 35% Methocel K100M
`with hydrophobic barrier layers (WHW) compared with a hydrophobic matrix containing [•] 55% Carnauba wax (W2) (24 h data
`not shown).
`
`experiments, 3.0 ml dissolution samples were with-
`drawn at predetermined time intervals for up to 24
`h, and replaced with equal volumes of the fresh
`medium to maintain the total volume constant.
`Samples were filtered through a filter (4.5 pm) and
`assayed by UV spectrophotometry at 276 nm.
`
`2.4. In vivo studies
`
`Based on the in vitro release, a layered hy-
`drophilic matrix (HHH) and a simple hydropho-
`bic matrix (W2) with significantly differing in
`vitro release rates were assessed in a series of
`studies in a group of six beagle dogs. Animals
`were handled according to protocols approved by
`Abbott's Institutional Animal Care and Use
`Committee. Each study was carried out at least 1
`week apart. An oral aqueous solution of ABT-089
`and an immediate-release capsule were used as
`references.
`The preliminary evaluation of the matrix for-
`mulations HHH was carried out in a sub-group of
`three animals. The animals were fasted overnight
`prior to dosing but were permitted water ad libi-
`
`tum. Each animal received a single tablet contain-
`ing 30 mg of ABT-089 followed by — 10 ml of
`water. Under this fasting dosing regimen, food
`was returned to each animal 12 h after dosing.
`A second study evaluated the matrix formula-
`tion W2 with the release rate slower than matrix
`HHH. The formulation was orally administered
`to a group of six fasting animals using the same
`protocol as described above.
`Sequential blood samples were obtained from
`each animal prior to dosing and at selected time
`points post dosing interval in each of the studies
`outlined above. The blood sampling schemes were
`0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 9.0,
`12.0 h for the immediate-release formulations and
`0, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 9.0, 12.0, 15.0
`and 24.0 h for the sustained-release tablets, re-
`spectively. Plasma was separated by centrifuga-
`tion (2500 rev./min x 10 min, 4°C) and frozen
`( — 30°C) until analyzed. The plasma concentra-
`tions of ABT-089 were determined by a validated
`method of reverse phase HPLC following pre-
`column fluorescent derivatizati on (Hui and
`Marsh, 1995).
`
`MYLAN Ex 1045, Page 4
`
`

`

`Y. Qiu et al. /International Journal of Pharmaceutics 157 (1997) 43-52 (cid:9)
`
`47
`
`Table 3
`Results of linear regression of fractional release (F) vs square-root-of-time (t'/2) for hydrophilic and hydrophobic sustained-release
`matrices of ABT-089
`
`Matrix system
`
`Release rate constant (h -1/2)
`
`Intercept
`
`Coefficient of Determination (R2)
`
`H1
`HHH
`WHW
`
`W1
`W2
`W3
`W4
`W5
`W6
`W7
`
`0.449
`0.424
`0.355
`
`0.162
`0.188
`0.205
`0.115
`0.181
`0.201
`0.287
`
`0.105
`—0.082
`0.015
`
`0.043
`0.039
`0.013
`0.045
`0.071
`0.098
`0.071
`
`0.9983
`0.9752
`0.9947
`
`0.9952
`0.9985
`0.9967
`0.9928
`0.9940
`0.9952
`0.9906
`
`2.5. Data analysis
`
`3.1. In vitro release kinetics
`
`The area under the plasma concentration—time
`curve from time zero to the last sampling time
`point t (AUCt) was calculated by the trapezoidal
`rule. The AUC values were normalized on the
`basis of dog weights. Deconvolution was per-
`formed in order to evaluate the rate of drug
`release/absorption. Plasma concentration data fol-
`lowing oral administration of the solution were
`fitted to polyexponentials (PROC NLIN of SAS,
`version 6.09, of SAS Institute, Cary, NC and
`RSTRIP of Micromath®, Salt Lake City, UT) and
`used as the unit impulse response, C,5(t). Drug
`plasma data from tablet formulations C(t) were
`fitted to a smoothing cubic spline function and
`then deconvoluted with C,5(t) using program
`PCDCON (W.R. Gillespie, FDA) to estimate in
`vivo drug release from the matrix formulations.
`
`3. Results and discussion
`
`Physicochemical properties of a compound are
`important to drug absorption as well as the design
`of the delivery system. Due to extremely high
`aqueous solubility of ABT-089, hydrophobic and
`hydrophilic matrix systems with or without re-
`stricted release area were tested to control the
`drug release.
`
`Fig. 2 compares drug release profiles of differ-
`ent types of matrix formulations. Each curve typi-
`cally represents the mean of three replicates.
`Overall, low variability was observed in the re-
`lease profiles (CV < 5%).
`
`3.1.1. Hydrophilic matrix system
`The release of a dispersed drug from a non-
`crosslinked hydrophilic polymer matrix system
`can be related to time according to Eq. (1) (Ho-
`gan, 1989):
`
`F = kt" (cid:9)
`
`(1)
`
`where F is the fraction released at time t, k is a
`constant incorporating characteristics of the
`macromolecular network system and the drug,
`and n is an exponent characteristic of the trans-
`port mechanism. Eq. (1) is a generalized semi-em-
`pirical equation that describes two apparently
`independent mechanisms of drug transport from a
`matrix system, i.e. a Fickian and a non-Fickian
`mechanism. ABT-089 was homogeneously dis-
`persed throughout the hydrophilic polymer ma-
`trix. Because of its high solubility, Fickian
`diffusion is expected to be a predominant release
`mechanism. Thus, an approximately linear rela-
`tionship between fractional release and the square
`root of time was obtained for this system (Table
`3). The drug release from the single layer matrices
`
`MYLAN Ex 1045, Page 5
`
`(cid:9)
`

`

`48 (cid:9)
`
`Y. Qiu et al. /International Journal of Pharmaceutics 157 (1997) 43-52
`
`2
`
`4
`Time (hr)
`
`8
`
`1.0 (cid:9)
`
`
`
`0.8 -
`
`0.6
`
`0.4
`
`0.0
`
`0
`
`Fractional Release
`
`Fig. 3. Comparison of ABT-089 release profiles from hydrophobic matrices containing [A] 50% (W3); [0] 55% (W2); [n ] 60%
`Carnauba wax (W1), and [ x ] 40% (W7); [q
`] 48% (W6); [1] 51% (W5) and [0] 55% (W4) Sterotex K (24 h data not shown).
`
`was rapid. Approximately 90% of the drug was
`released in the first 3-4 h. Rapid release was
`likely due to the high solubility as well as high
`diffusivity of ABT-089 since two matrices con-
`taining polymers of differing viscosities resulted in
`the same release rates at a relatively high polymer
`concentration.
`
`3.1.2. Three-layer hydrophilic matrix system
`Drug release rate is not only dependent on
`diffusion coefficient, diffusion path length and
`concentration gradient, but also on the surface
`area available for release. Hence, reduction of
`releasing area was used to modulate the dissolu-
`tion rate of ABT-089. A hydrophilic matrix con-
`taining the drug was sandwiched with soluble/
`swellable barriers on both bases of the tablet by
`compression. In this system, the release of drug
`from the middle layer was effectively slowed by
`delaying or preventing drug diffusion from the
`two base surfaces. The early release of the drug
`occurred from the greatly reduced surface along
`the peripheral wall. Complete release can be
`achieved as a result of polymer dissolution over a
`prolonged period of time (e.g. 24 h). Fig. 2 indi-
`
`cates that the release rate of ABT-089 from the
`HHH system was significantly retarded. A differ-
`ent hydrophilic layered matrix, WHW, was pre-
`pared by applying hydrophobic insoluble barriers
`on both bases of the tablet. It was observed that
`the drug release rate of the system WHW was
`similar to that of HHH system. The fact that both
`insoluble and soluble barriers are equally effective
`in decreasing the release rate suggests that the
`middle layer hydrates and erodes more rapidly
`than the soluble barrier layers. Complete release
`was also obtained as the middle layer was com-
`pletely hydrated and eroded by 24 h. The drug
`release from matrix WHW also followed a square-
`root of time relationship. Although decreased re-
`lease rate had been obtained with the layered
`matrices, the overall drug release was still rela-
`tively fast, possibly a result of both high solubility
`and diffusivity of ABT-089. To further extend the
`release of ABT-089 from the dosage form, hydro-
`phobic matrix systems were tested.
`
`3.1.3. Hydrophobic matrix system
`Hydrophobic inert matrix is one of the well
`developed matrix systems used for sustained drug
`delivery because of its effectiveness and low cost,
`
`MYLAN Ex 1045, Page 6
`
`

`

`Y. Qiu et al. /International Journal of Pharmaceutics 157 (1997) 43-52 (cid:9)
`
`49
`
`y = 0.422 - 0.004x RA2 = 0.986
`
`y = 0.728 - 0.011x RA2 = 0.985
`
`0.3
`
`0.2 -
`
`Release Rate (hr^-1/2)
`
`0.1
`30
`
`40
`
`5'0
`Wax %
`
`601
`
`70
`
`Fig. 4. Release rates versus percent wax of different hydrophobic matrices ([ x ]: Carnauba wax; [0]: Sterotex K).
`
`1000
`
`10
`
`Plasma Concentration (ng/ml)
`
`4 (cid:9)
`
`8 (cid:9)
`
`12
`Time (hr)
`
`16
`
`20
`
`24
`
`Fig. 5. Plasma concentration-time profiles of ABT-089 in dogs after a single oral dose of [A] an immediate-release (IR) capsule,
`[0] a layered hydrophilic matrix containing 35% Methocel K100M (HHH) and [•] a hydrophobic matrix containing 55% carnauba
`wax (W2) in the fasted state; [—] MEC (mean ± S.E., Dose = 3.0 mg/kg).
`
`especially for highly water-soluble compounds.
`There have been many studies concerning the
`matrix system and its variations with modified
`release kinetics (Higuchi, 1963; Desai et al., 1965;
`Foster and Parrott, 1990; Scott and Hollenbeck,
`
`1991; Lee, 1992; Otsuka and Matsuda, 1994,
`1995; Hildgen and McMullen, 1995). Compared
`with other delivery systems, this type of matrix is
`relatively insensitive to changes in release environ-
`ment because diffusion from the noneroding ma-
`
`MYLAN Ex 1045, Page 7
`
`

`

`50 (cid:9)
`
`Y. Qiu et al. /International Journal of Pharmaceutics 157 (1997) 43-52
`
`o (cid:9)
`•
`
`y = 0.000 + 1.088x RA2 = 0.997
`y = - 0.006 + 0.888x RA2 = 0.988
`
`1.0
`
`0.8 -
`
`0.6 -
`
`0.4 -
`
`0.2 -
`
`Fractional release in vivo
`
`0.0 (cid:9)
`0 0 (cid:9)
`
`
`0.2
`
`0.6
`0.4 (cid:9)
`Fractional release in vitro
`
`0 . 8
`
`1 0
`
`Fig. 6. Correlations between in vitro and in vivo release of ABT-089 from [0] a layered hydrophilic matrix containing 35% Methocel
`K100M (HHH) and [•1 a hydrophobic matrix containing 55% carnauba wax (W2).
`
`trix is the rate controlling factor (Desai et al.,
`1965). The release mechanism of a heterogeneous
`matrix is diffusion through aqueous channels
`formed by dissolution of the drug and soluble
`excipients in the formulation. Based on sink con-
`ditions and pseudo-steady-state approximation
`(drug loading per unit volume, A, » solubility,
`Cs), Higuchi (1963) developed an approximate
`analytical solution for a rigid planar matrix, i.e.
`D
` t (cid:9)
`
`(2)
`
`1 [
`Mt
`Moc, Moc,
`
`cCs(2A— ECs)
`
`where Mt and Al„, are the amounts released per
`unit area at t and infinity, respectively. D is the
`diffusion coefficient of the drug in the medium, c
`is porosity and r is tortuosity of the matrix.
`In the present study, the use of a hydrophobic
`carnauba wax matrix significantly decreased re-
`lease rates of ABT-089 as demonstrated in Fig. 3.
`The release mechanism from the non-swellable
`matrix system followed typical Fickian diffusion
`that can be described by Eq. (2) (Table 3).
`Carnauba wax was found to be effective in
`controlling the release of ABT-089. However, the
`formulation suffered from rapid hardening and
`
`sticking which caused difficulty in cleaning equip-
`ment. In order to overcome this problem, par-
`tially hydrogenated cottonseed oil (Sterotex K),
`with a melting point similar to carnauba wax, was
`evaluated as a hydrophobic rate controlling mate-
`rial. Drug release profiles comparing hydrophobic
`matrix formulations containing different percent-
`ages of carnauba wax (W1 —W3) and Sterotex K
`(W4—W7) are shown in Fig. 3. The release rates
`of Formulations W1 —W7 were determined by
`fitting the in vitro release data to Eq. (2) (Table
`3). It was found that approximately linear rela-
`tionships between drug release rate and percent
`wax in the formulations were obtained for car-
`nauba wax as well as Sterotex K formulations
`(Fig. 4). As can be seen, the formulations contain-
`ing carnauba wax resulted in a comparatively
`higher release rate than those containing Sterotex
`K at the concentrations above approximately
`46%. The rate of drug release also changed more
`rapidly with wax concentration for formulations
`containing Sterotex K. This observation may be
`attributed, at least in part, to the difference in
`hydrophobicity between the two wax materials.
`More hydrophobic trigylerides (Sterotex K) might
`
`MYLAN Ex 1045, Page 8
`
`

`

`Y. Qiu et al. /International Journal of Pharmaceutics 157 (1997) 43-52 (cid:9)
`
`51
`
`be more effective in preventing the penetration of
`water and/or interaction with water than esters of
`hydroxylated unsaturated fatty acid (Carnauba
`wax).
`
`3.2. In vivo absorption
`
`Fig. 5 shows the plasma concentration—time
`profiles of ABT-089 following single oral adminis-
`tration of the two matrix formulations in dogs as
`compared with an immediate-release capsule for-
`mulation. Prolonged absorption was achieved
`with both sustained-release formulations, provid-
`ing plasma levels of ABT-089 above the minimum
`effective concentration (Arneric et al., 1996) of 2
`ng/ml for over 22 h. Qualitative comparison of
`the two formulations relative to the reference
`suggested that the sustained effects were in the
`same rank order as the in vitro drug release.
`Preformulation and animal studies had indicated
`that ABT-089 is stable at intestinal pH and effi-
`ciently absorbed throughout the whole intestinal
`tract (unpublished data). This was indirectly sup-
`ported in the current study by the fact that com-
`plete absorption relative to an ABT-089 solution
`was achieved with the hydrophilic matrix (HHH)
`and that absorption of a compound having a very
`short half-life was extended beyond the time
`frame of small intestine transit in dogs.
`In the fasted state, estimates of bioavailability
`relative to oral solution were 103.6 + 6.2% and
`59.9 ± 14.0% for the hydrophilic (HHH) and the
`hydrophobic (W3) matrix, respectively. The hy-
`drophobic matrix provided a smaller fluctuation
`ratio (c,„/C24 h) of the plasma levels. The more
`prolonged absorption corresponding to the lower
`extent of absorption was not unexpected as for-
`mulations with slower release rates could be ex-
`pelled from the body prior to the completion of
`the drug release. It is known that the average
`transit time in the entire gastrointestinal tract in
`fasted dogs is about 13 h (Davies and Morris,
`1993).
`The in vivo release of the drug from matrices
`was estimated by deconvolution of plasma profiles
`based on linear system analysis (Cutler, 1978).
`Plasma concentration data for each dog following
`
`administration of the oral solution were fitted to
`polyexponentials and used as unit impulse re-
`sponse C,5(t). Drug plasma data of the tablet
`formulations from the same dog, C(t), were de-
`convoluted with Co(t) to obtain in vivo drug
`release from the matrix formulations. The cumu-
`lative percent of the dose released in the GI tract,
`i.e. 'GI bioavailability' (Gillespie and Veng-
`Pedersen, 1985) of both matrices were estimated
`by the plateau values from respective in vivo
`release profiles at 24 h. The bioavailability esti-
`mates were 105.7 ± 6.5% for the hydrophilic sys-
`tem and 61.7 ± 13.8% for the hydrophobic
`system, respectively. The results closely match the
`relative bioavailability data calculated based on
`AUC, suggesting formulation release-controlled
`apparent absorption.
`
`3.3. In vitro /in vivo correlation
`
`The establishment of a relationship between the
`in vivo input rate and in vitro drug release from
`the dosage form is an important part in the
`formulation development process. A validated re-
`lationship between in vitro and in vivo release can
`be useful in setting up a meaningful in vitro
`quality control procedure that is predictive of
`product performance and can justify a change in
`formulation (Skelly et al., 1990).
`The preliminary in vitro/in vivo correlations for
`ABT-089 sustained-release tablets were explored
`by comparing the in vitro release data with in
`vivo drug release obtained from deconvolution.
`The results in Fig. 6 demonstrate linear correla-
`tions between in vivo and in vitro release for both
`matrix systems. A slope of 1.09 with an intercept
`of zero was obtained for the hydrophilic matrix,
`indicating a near 1:1 relationship. A slope of 0.89
`along with a near zero intercept also shows a
`good linear relationship between in vitro and in
`vivo release for the hydrophobic matrix. Overall,
`the in vivo drug release rate was slightly slower
`compared with the in vitro drug release. It has
`been well recognized that separate in vitro/in vivo
`correlations are generally obtained for different
`types of products of the same drug (Skelly et al.,
`1990).
`
`MYLAN Ex 1045, Page 9
`
`

`

`52 (cid:9)
`
`Y. Qiu et al. /International Journal of Pharmaceutics 157 (1997) 43-52
`
`4. Conclusions
`
`In summary, the present study demonstrated
`that prolonged oral delivery of ABT-089 with
`reduced fluctuation of plasma levels can be
`achieved using matrix systems. However, it is
`difficult to obtain sustained delivery over a longer
`period of time with hydrophilic matrix systems for
`a compound having extremely high solubility and
`diffusivity, such as ABT-089. Hydrophobic matrix
`is more effective in extending the release of this
`type of compound. Therefore, use of either insolu-
`ble heterogenous matrix or reservoir system may
`be necessary in order to develop an once-daily
`formulation of ABT-089 for humans.
`
`Acknowledgements
`
`Technical assistance from Lisa Ruiz is appreci-
`ated. The authors also would like to thank Drs
`P.K. Gupta and S. Silvestri for helpful discus-
`sions, Dr W. Gillespie for providing the PCD-
`CON program.
`
`References
`
`Arneric, S.P., Bannon, A.W., Briggs, C.A., Brioni, J.D., Buc-
`cafusco, J.J., Decker, M.W., Gopalakrishnan, M., Holla-
`day, M.W., Kyncl, J., Lin, N.H., Marsh, K.G., Qiu, Y.,
`Radek, R., Donnelly-Roberts, D.L., Sullivan, J.P.,
`Williams, M., 1996. ABT-089: an orally active cholinergic
`channel modulator (ChCM) with cognitive enhancing and
`neuroprotective activity. In: Becker, R., Giacobini, E.,
`Robert, P. (Eds.), Alzheimer's Disease: From Molecular
`Biology to Therapy. Birkhauser, Boston.
`Arneric, S.P., Campbell, J.E., Holladay, M.W., Johnson, P.,
`Lin, N.H., Marsh, K.G., Petersen, B., Qiu, Y., Roberts,
`E.M., Rodrigues, A.D., Sullivan, J.P., Trivedi, J.,
`Williams, M., submitted. ABT-089 [3-(2-(S)-pyrrolidinyl-
`methoxy)-2-methyl-pyridine]: III. An orally effective
`cholinergic channel modulator with potential once-a-day
`dosing and cardiovascular safety. Drug Development Re-
`search, in press.
`Cutler, D., 1978. Linear system analysis in pharmacokinetics.
`Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 6,
`265 -282.
`Davies, B., Morris, T., 1993. Physiological parameters in
`laboratory animals and humans. Pharmaceutical Research
`10, 1093-1095.
`
`Desai, S.J., Simonelli, A.P., Higuchi, W.I., 1965. Investigation
`of factors influencing release of solid drug dispersed in
`inert matrices. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 54,
`1459-1464.
`Foster, T.P., Parrott, EL., 1990. Release of highly water-solu-
`ble medicinal compounds from inert, heterogeneous ma-
`trixes. I: Physical mixture. Journal of Pharmaceutical
`Sciences 79, 806-810.
`Gillespie, W., Veng-Pedersen, P., 1985. A polyexponential
`deconvolution method. Evaluation of the 'gastrointestinal
`bioavailability' and mean in vivo dissolution time of some
`ibuprofen dosage forms. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and
`Biopharmaceutics 13, 289-307.
`Higuchi, T., 1963. Mechanism of sustained-action medication.
`Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 52, 1145-1150.
`Hildgen, P., McMullen, J.N., 1995. A new gradient matrix
`formulation and characterization. Journal of Controlled
`Release 34, 263-271.
`Hogan, J.E., 1989. Hydroxypropylmethylcellulose sustained
`release technology. Drug Development and Industrial
`Pharmacy 15, 975-999.
`Hui, Y., Marsh, K.C., 1995. Sensitive detection of selected
`cholinergic channel activators derived with 7-fluoro-4-ni-
`trobenzo-2-oxa-1,3-diazole. Journal of Pharmaceutical and
`Biomedical Analyses 14, 131-142.
`Lee, L., 1992. In: Kydonieus, A. (Ed.), Treatise on Controlled
`Drug Delivery: Diffusion-Controlled Matrix Systems.
`Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 155-198.
`Lin, N.H., Gunn, D.E., Ryther, KB., Garvey, D.S., Donnelly-
`Roberts, D.L., Decker, M.W., Brioni, J.D., Buckley, M.J.,
`Rodrigues, A.D., Marsh, K.G., Anerson, D.J., Sullivan,
`J.P., Williams, M., Arneric, S.P., Holladay, M.W., 1997.
`Structure-activity studies on ABT-089: an orally bioavail-
`able 3-pyridyl ether cholinergic channel moderator with
`cognitive enhancing properties. Journal of Medicinal
`Chemistry 40, 385-390.
`Otsuka, M., Matsuda, Y., 1994. Controlled drug release of
`highly water-soluble pentoxifylline from time-limit disinte-
`gration-type wax matrix tablets. Pharmaceutical Research
`11, 351-354.
`Otsuka, M., Matsuda, Y., 1995. Programmable drug release of
`highly water-soluble pentoxifylline from dry-coated wax
`matrix tablets. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 84,
`443-447.
`Scott, D.C., Hollenbeck, R.G., 1991. Design and manufacture
`of a zero-order sustained-release pellet dosage form
`through nonuniform drug distribution in a diffusional
`matrix. Pharmaceutical Research 8, 156-161.
`Skelly, J.P., et al., 1990. In vitro and in vivo testing and
`correlation for oral controlled/modified-release dosage
`forms. Pharmaceutical Research 7, 975-982.
`Williams, M., Arneric, S.P., 1996. Alzheimer's disease:
`Prospects for treatment in the next decades. In: Brioni,
`J.D., Decker, M.W. (Eds.), Alzheimer's Disease. Wiley-
`Liss, New York, 1996.
`
`MYLAN Ex 1045, Page 10
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket