`Patent No. 7,268,703 B1
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`FLIR SYSTEMS, INC. and
`FLIR MARITIME US, INC. (F/K/A RAYMARINE, INC.),
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`GARMIN SWITZERLAND GmbH,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR2017-00946
`Patent No. 7,268,703 B1
`
`DECLARATION OF STEPHEN P. BOSCO IN
`SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE
`ADMISSION
`
`EXHIBIT 1023.001
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF MR. STEPHEN BOSCO IN SUPPORT OF
`MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`I, Stephen P. Bosco, am over eighteen years of age and would be
`
`competent to testify as to the matters set forth herein if called upon to do so.
`
`1.
`
`I am an attorney in the law firm of Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP.
`
`I have over four years of experience as a patent litigator and have represented
`
`clients in numerous patent litigation cases in various United States District
`
`Courts.
`
`2.
`
`My educational and professional backgrounds make me familiar
`
`with the subject matter at hand. Before I became an attorney, I served for six
`
`years as an active duty Surface Warfare officer in the United States Navy.
`
`During that time, I received training on marine navigation techniques and
`
`related technology, and I utilized a wide variety of marine navigational
`
`technologies while serving as Officer-of-the-Deck responsible for the safe
`
`navigation of a U.S. Navy Frigate. As a result, I am comfortable and
`
`experienced with the technology at issue in this proceeding.
`
`3.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the bar of the Court of Appeals
`
`for the Federal Circuit, the state bar of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and the
`
`bar of the District of Columbia.
`
`4.
`
`I have not been suspended or disbarred from practice before any
`
`court or administrative body.
`
`EXHIBIT 1023.002
`
`
`
`5.
`
`Other than a single pro hac vice motion denied for technical
`
`reasons, I have never had an application for admission to practice before any
`
`court or administrative body denied.
`
`6.
`
`No sanction or contempt citation has been imposed against me by
`
`any court or administrative body.
`
`7.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of 37 C.F.R.
`
`8.
`
`I will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set
`
`forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. §
`
`11.19(a).
`
`9.
`
`I have not applied to appear pro hac vice in any proceedings before
`
`the USPTO in the last three years.
`
`10.
`
`I am familiar with the subject matter at issue in the proceeding. I
`
`am co-counsel for Petitioner in a co-pending litigation, Garmin Switzerland
`
`GmbH et al. v. FLIR Systems, Inc. et al., Case No.: 17-cv-01147-SB (D. Or.), in
`
`which U.S. Patent No. 7,268,703 is currently asserted. I therefore have an
`
`established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding,
`
`including the prior art.
`
`11.
`
`I am an experienced patent litigation attorney, with experience in
`
`numerous patent litigations in District Courts across the country. My
`
`biography is attached hereto as Ex. 1024.
`
`EXHIBIT 1023.003
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00946
`Patent No. 7,268,703 B1
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Declaration is true and
`
`correct.
`
`Dated: October 24, 2017
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/ Stephen P. Bosco /
`Stephen P. Bosco
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`1300 Eye Street NW, Suite 900
`Washington, D.C. 20005-3314
`202-682-7054
`stephen.bosco@weil.com
`
`EXHIBIT 1023.004
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
