`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`
`
`FLIR SYSTEMS, INC. and
`FLIR MARITIME US, INC. (F/K/A RAYMARINE, INC.),
`Petitioner
`v.
`
`GARMIN SWITZERLAND GmbH,
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-00946
`Patent 7,268,703 B1
`____________
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00946
`U.S. Patent No. 7,268,703
`
`Pursuant to the Board’s August 10, 2017, Scheduling Order (Paper 8), Patent
`
`Owner respectfully requests oral argument for the trial currently scheduled on April
`
`11, 2018. Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), Patent Owner requests one (1) hour of
`
`total time in view of the Motion to Amend and the issues raised in Petitioner’s
`
`challenge to the original claims. Patent Owner specifies the following issues, without
`
`intent to waive consideration of any issue not requested, to be argued for this
`
`proceeding:
`
`I.
`
`whether Challenged Claims 1, 7, 12, 19, 27, and 28 are anticipated under
`
`35 U.S.C. § 102(b) by de Jong (EX_1005);
`
`II. whether Challenged Claims 2-6, 13-18, 20-23, 25, 26, 29, and 41-45 are
`
`unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over de Jong (EX_1005) and
`
`III.
`
`IV.
`
`Tetley (EX_1006);
`
`the proper construction of disputed claim terms;
`
`the patentability of the substitute claims presented in the contingent
`
`Motion to Amend (Paper 22) in view of de Jong (EX_1005) in
`
`combination with Tetley (EX_1006) and any arguments raised by
`
`Petitioner in its Opposition to the Motion to Amend (Paper 23);
`
`V.
`
`in addition to the Motion to Amend, any issues raised in any other
`
`pending motions; and
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`VI.
`
`any additional issues raised by the Board.
`
`IPR2017-00946
`U.S. Patent No. 7,268,703
`
`Patent Owner requests use of audio/visual equipment to display demonstrative
`
`exhibits, including a projector and screen for a PowerPoint display. Per Trial Practice
`
`Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. at 48768, Patent Owner will contact the Board Trial Division
`
`paralegal to discuss this request.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`/Jennifer C. Bailey/
`Jennifer C. Bailey, Reg. No. 52,583
`Adam P. Seitz, Reg. No. 52,206
`ERISE IP, P.A.
`7015 College Boulevard, Suite 700
`Overland Park, Kansas 66211
`Telephone: (913) 777-5600
`Facsimile: (913) 777-5601
`Jennifer.Bailey@eriseip.com
`Adam.Seitz@eriseip.com
`PTAB@eriseip.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PATENT OWNER
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00946
`U.S. Patent No. 7,268,703
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6, I hereby certify that a true copy of the
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT is served via
`Electronic Mail this 1st day of March 2018, in their entireties on the following lead
`and back-up counsel for Petitioner, FLIR Systems, Inc. & FLIR Maritime US, Inc.
`(f/k/a Raymarine, Inc.):
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Brian Ferguson (Reg. No. 36,801)
`Anish R. Desai (Reg. No. 73,760)
`Christopher Pepe (Reg. No. 73,851)
`Stephen P. Bosco, Pro Hac Vice
`Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
`1300 Eye Street NW, Suite 900
`Washington, DC 20005
`Telephone: (202) 682-8000
`FLIR.703.IPR@weil.com
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`/Jennifer C. Bailey/
`Jennifer C. Bailey, Reg. No. 52,583
`Adam P. Seitz, Reg. No. 52,206
`ERISE IP, P.A.
`7015 College Boulevard, Suite 700
`Overland Park, Kansas 66211
`Telephone: (913) 777-5600
`Facsimile: (913) 777-5601
`Jennifer.Bailey@eriseip.com
`Adam.Seitz@eriseip.com
`PTAB@eriseip.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PATENT OWNER
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
