throbber
1970. No. 7/8.19
`
`225
`
`Some problems
`of MOS technology
`
`J. A. Appcls, H. Kalter and E. Kooi
`
`Introduction
`Scientists
`and engineers
`working
`in MOS tra11sis1or
`magnitude
`of the charge induced
`in the channel.
`A
`theoretical
`analy,is
`based on detailed
`physica
`I consid­
`technology
`are charged
`wi1h the production
`of MOS
`ha, shown that this is to be expected 131.
`tr:insistors
`and integra1ed
`circuits
`that posse,,
`certain
`erations
`specified
`charactcri;,tics.
`arc stable in behaviour,
`and
`It has also been found that the surface
`mobility
`is
`give high production
`yields.
`The specified
`requirements
`depcndem on the crystal
`orientation
`at the surface.
`For
`electrons
`the mobility
`is greatest
`for the (100) plane of
`determine
`the \·ariou, <;tcps in the production
`process:
`,ilicon;
`the surface
`mobility
`in this plane can c,en ap­
`from the design geometry
`to the choice and techniques
`dilTu,ion an<l other proce,,e�
`in
`pruad, the ,alue of,, in the bulk. For the holes the
`of OAi<lation.
`etching,
`111. Some of
`the manufacture of a MOS tramistor
`the problems
`which this
`in\'ol,es
`arc dcscrihcd
`in this
`article:
`the structure
`and operation
`of the MOS tran­
`in thi� i��uc 121.
`sistor.
`which arc drah "ith el,e\\here
`are assumed to be generall>
`familiar
`10 the reader.
`A typical
`example of a quantity
`that is determined
`by design geometry and
`technological
`processes
`is the
`transconductance
`of the MOS transistor.
`In the article
`ju�t noted
`C�l it is ,hown that the transconductancc
`- and hence the current
`that the transistor can
`carry
`at the maximum permissible
`gate voltage is propor­
`tional
`to
`
`(I)
`rig_ I Schema1ic
`diagram
`of a MOS uansi:,tor.
`made on a
`P-tvpc
`silicon
`substr.,tc.
`I "0 diffused
`zones of N s,l,con
`con­
`Herc I' i, the mohility
`of the charge carriers
`in the
`stiHHc
`1hc \ource
`Sand l11e drain D Bct"ee1"t
`thi;;m. isolated
`by
`an o,,ide
`layer Ox, is a mewl control
`elec1rode,
`the gate G. If
`channel.
`C." the capacitance
`of the gate per unit area,
`G i, ,uffidt.·ntl)
`po,i1ive.
`a ..:oncentr..ition
`of frci: dcclrons
`occurs
`11· is the width and / the length of the channel
`( fig. /).
`under the gate, forming
`an /\,-type
`conducting
`channel
`between
`The mobility
`,u depends on the semiconductor
`�ourc� and drain.
`·1 he length / anti width w of the channel.
`c.tnd
`the 1h1dnc-.,, I, of the oxide urc the chief factors
`thal tlelermine
`material
`of which the MOS transistor
`is made. For
`the durac.:tc1
`i,tks or the MOS tr.111,i
`... 1or.
`pmctical
`reasons
`this is almost invariably
`silicon.
`One
`mobility
`is greatest
`for the (111) orientation.
`hut hole
`of these reasons
`is that it is rclati,el)' simple
`LO apply
`cITcctive
`isolating
`layer, to �ilirnn hy oxid<1tion.
`<\).
`mobility
`i, suh,tantially
`less than
`electron
`mobility.
`To achieve
`the maximum carrier mobility,
`and hence
`though impurity
`centre,
`or defects
`may be nrcscnt
`at
`the ma,\i111unt
`lrdn�1:ondu1:1ance,
`the best choice is an
`the Si,SiO, interface.
`the nuture and concentrations
`of
`1\'-channel
`tram,btor
`on a silicon
`chip whose surface
`is
`these impurities
`can now be <·0111
`rolled.
`and they
`can
`oriented
`in the (100)
`r,lane.
`in fact be u,ed to al1er the behaviour
`of a MOS tran­
`1r a high value of fl is desired
`it is also necessary
`to
`sistor
`in .i desired
`direction. \1uch of thi� article
`,\ill
`h:ive a high Co, (sec equation
`I), and for this purpo�e
`be concerned
`,\ith the Si/510, interface.
`the oxide layer under the gate is made as thin Hs po,­
`In the hulk of the silicon
`the mobility
`1• may be
`�ible.
`Th� minimum thickncs� is mainly determined by
`regarded
`as a constam of the material.
`At the surface
`the mobility
`is usually
`appreciably
`lower than in the
`111 A dcscnntJon
`ol thc photo-etching
`and diffusion
`processes
`i�
`bulk. N01 only may it be affected
`here hy the impurities
`gi,cn in: A. Schmitt,
`Solid cirtui".
`Philip"
`tech. Rev. 27.
`or dcrcct,.
`but it is also found that
`ft decreases
`,\ith
`192-199,
`1966.
`1�1 J. A. van ]'.ielen.
`Operation
`and d.c. beha, iour of MOS tni n­
`increasing
`gate voltage,
`and therefore
`depends on the
`sistors:
`this issue,
`page 209.
`IJI N. St. J. Murphy,
`F. Acrr and I. Flinn,
`Can ier motnlity
`in
`J. A. Appe/s,
`Drs. H. Ka/Jrr am/ Dr. /:.. Koui (Ire wit// l'/11/ips
`MOS transistors:
`this is.,uc.
`page 2.17.
`RNeurt I, / 11/>ora,orieo::.
`Ei,1d/11u•p11
`
`Page 1 of 13
`
`Global Foundaries US v. Godo Kaisha
`Global Ex. 1005
`
`

`

`226
`
`PHILIPS TECHNICAL REVIEW
`
`VOLUME 31
`
`the breakdownfield-strength (about 103 V/um); prac-
`tical values frequently lie between 0.05 and 0.25 um.
`The dimensionsofthe silicon chips set an upperlimit
`to the width w of the channel, and of course the chance
`of a defect increases with increasing w. A width of a
`few millimetres is fairly easy to achieve, and special
`techniques can be applied to give a channel with a
`width of a few centimetres [4],
`The length / of the channel cannot be made very
`small without running the risk of “punch-through”,i.e.
`a flow of current between source and drain outside the
`channel. The length / is usually a few microns, but
`special methods can be usedto bring it down to about
`1 micron. A very short channel is particularly impor-
`tant in MOStransistors for the UHF band (5).
`In addition to the transconductance 8, the parasitic
`capacitances play an important part in fast transistors.
`The mostdetrimental oneis usually the feedback capac-
`itance between drain and gate [6]. This capacitance
`depends on the amountof overlap between drain and
`gate: it can be reduced by bringingthe gate into accur-
`ate register with the channel region. Various useful
`methods that we have developed for this will be
`discussed in this article.
`The speedofintegrated circuits made with MOStran-
`sistors is mainly limited by the parasitic capacitance
`between wiring and substrate. MOS transistors are
`therefore made with thick oxide layers underthe wiring
`but with thin oxide layers at the active regions. This
`approachalso tends to prevent the formation of para-
`sitic MOStransistors; these can be formed when a
`voltage applied to a conductor induces a conducting
`channel in the substrate underneath the conductor. In
`the transition from the thick oxide to the thin oxide
`there has to be a step in the metallization; this has
`often proved to be a weak spot. We havetherefore
`developed a process in which the thicker oxide is
`embedded deeperin the silicon substrate, so that any
`steps above the surface are smaller. This is known as
`the LOCOSprocess (local oxidation of silicon), and
`will also be described in this article.
`First of all we shall take a closer look atthesili-
`con/silicon-dioxide interface. The surface defects pres-
`ent there and the contact potential of the gate metal
`and the substrate doping all have an important effect
`on the threshold voltage, i.e. the minimumgatevoltage
`needed to form a channel 2). In fact these defects can
`have a much greater
`influence than the contact
`potential and substrate doping. They can change the
`threshold voltage by tens of volts, whereas the changes
`due to differences in contact potential between dissim-
`ilar metals and the variation of substrate doping that
`occurs in practice amount to only a few volts. The
`presence of mobile ions can result in a slow change
`
`in the threshold voltage. Control of the threshold
`voltage and making surethatit is stable are the main
`factors that decide which technology should be followed.
`
`Thesilicon/silicon-dioxide interface
`
`treatment given here of the sili-
`The theoretical
`con/silicon-dioxide interface makes no pretence at
`being complete, but is a simple model that is neverthe-
`less capable of explaining many experimental results,
`and one that has also been found useful for qualita-
`tively predicting the behaviour of the Si/SiO2 system
`from the processing conditions that were used whenit
`was made. In this model we distinguish between defects
`of two kinds:
`a) Surface states — states that can exchange charge
`with the silicon, and which can be described in
`physical terms as quantum states with an energy
`level between the valence and conduction band;
`b) Oxide charge — fixed positive charges (ionized
`donors) near the interface and presumably in the
`oxide.
`Weshall now consider both types of defect in turn.
`
`e
`
`e
`
`e
`
`Si: Si
`
`3
`
`~ Si: Sit Sit
`
`~- Si2T0: Si?
`
`6
`
`O
`O
`ee
`e
`ar)
`Si Ss3t Sit
`
`St Sits:
`
`Fig. 2. a) Crystal lattice of silicon. At the surface of the crystal
`(top of the figure) each atom has an unpaired electron. 6) Where
`the surface of the silicon crystal is covered with silicon dioxide,
`the lattices of the two substances do not exactly match. As a
`result silicon bonds remain unsaturated in places.
`
`Page 2 of 13
`
`

`

`1970, No. 7/8/9
`
`MOS TECHNOLOGY
`
`227
`
`Surface states
`bonds mayact not only as electron donorsor traps for
`holes, but also as traps for electrons, since trapping an
`If the crystal lattice terminates abruptly at the sur-
`face ofasilicon chip, then a large numberof unsaturat-
`electron changesa silicon atom with an unpaired elec-
`ed silicon bonds are to be expected,i.e. each atom in
`tron into an atom witheight electronsin its outer shell.
`the outside layer of silicon atoms should have an un-
`This is the inert-gas configuration:
`paired electron (jig. 2a). Since there are about 1015 Si
`:Si: +e“ =:Si: wee (4
`atomsper cm? at the surface, one would expect about
`the same numberof unsaturated bonds on a “clean”
`surface. If the silicon is oxidized, as it is in the case
`underconsideration, then the number of unsaturated
`bonds is of course lower, but it is not equal to zero
`because there will probably not be an exactfit between
`the Si and SiOe networks (fig. 25). We shall now. con-
`sider what electrical effects can result from the un-
`saturated silicon bonds.
`It is very probablethatit will take less energy to raise
`an unpaired electron into the conduction band than to
`raise a paired valence electron; in other words, the un-
`
`Theeffect may also be seen as the giving-up of a hole:
`
`‘Si: :Si: fet, wees (5)
`
`and we may then conclude that the relevant energy
`level must lie in the forbidden band.
`From a wide variety of measurements 7) it has been
`found that energy levels do in fact occur in the for-
`bidden band, and that broadly two groups may be
`distinguished: a group near
`the conduction band
`
`C5555OR QOGK0
`
`D
`LUMUP0G00:0:4,00 0-0:
`Met
`O55HSC
`
`%
`
`SX
`
`
`Ey xx
`A EABER BED SSS?
`
`VES HIIHG
`SO OO 0000
`
`
`Meeatetatatetatatetctetetctetetateteteteteten
`
`
`
`Fig. 3. The unpaired electron of a silicon atom with an unsaturated bond has an energy Ess
`which lies in the forbidden band between valence band (energy Ey) and conduction band
`(energy E;). The atom mayoccur as a donor; by giving up an electron (ontheleft) or taking
`up a hole (on the right) it then acquires a positive charge. If there is a high electron con-
`centration the atom may also occur as an acceptor and acquire a negative charge.
`
`paired electron possesses an energy level thatlies in the
`forbidden band. A silicon atom to which such anelec-
`tron is bound may give up this electron or take up a
`hole, but in both cases the atom itself becomes posi-
`tively charged (fig. 3):
`
`+
`‘Si: Si: te, 2... Q)
`:
`+
`et+ :Si:ae Si: 2.
`
`2 ew.
`
`. 8)
`
`— these are probably acceptor levels — and a group
`near the valence band — probably donorlevels. De-
`pending on the voltages applied in the measurements,
`there is a tendencyfor electrons or holes to concentrate
`at the Si/SiOe interface; if there is a high electron con-
`centration the defects act mainly as acceptorlevels, but
`at a high hole concentration mainly as donor levels.
`On the same sample the number of acceptor levels
`found in one measurementis invariably almost equal
`
`
`If we are dealing, for example, with P-typesilicon,
`then there are many holes and the equilibria (2) and (3)
`shift to the right. If moreover the energy gap Ess— Ey
`is small, a number of holes from the silicon may be
`trapped, and therefore the hole conduction near the
`surface of the crystal is not so good as in the bulk of
`the material.
`It is also conceivable ‘that the unsaturated silicon
`
`(4) R. D. Josephy, MOStransistors for power amplification in
`the HF band; this issue, page 251.
`{51 R. J. Nienhuis, A MOS tetrode for the UHF band witha
`channel 1.5 um long; this issue, page 259.
`.
`(6] Pp, A. H. Hart and F. M. Klaassen, The MOStransistor as
`a small-signal amplifier; this issue, page 216.
`(7] E. Kooi, The surface properties of oxidized silicon, Thesis,
`Eindhoven 1967.
`M. V. Whelan, Influence of charge interactions on capaci-
`tance versus voltage curves in MOSstructures, Philips Res.
`Repts. 20, 562-577, 1965; Electrical behaviour of defects ata
`thermally oxidized silicon surface, Thesis, Eindhoven 1970.
`
`Page 3 of 13
`
`

`

`228
`
`PHILIPS TECHNICAL REVIEW
`
`VOLUME 31
`
`to the numberof donorlevels found in another meas-
`urement;
`this lends plausibility to our assumption
`that the same trapping centres are involved in both
`cases.
`.
`
`‘ The assumption that the centres are related to un-
`saturated silicon bonds explains why the number of
`surface states depends on the crystal orientation of the
`silicon surface. If this is a (111) plane, then there are
`usually 3 to 5 times as many surface states as on a
`(100) plane. This suggests that the oxide networkfits
`better on a (100) crystal plane than on a (111) plane.
`Othercrystalorientations give various numbersofsur-
`face states that lie between those ofthe (100) and (111)
`planes.
`The way in which the surface states can affect the
`characteristics of a MOStransistor will be demon-
`strated by means of a numberof experimentaltransis-
`tors on a P-type silicon substrate, i.e. with an N-type
`channel. This channel would have to be induced by
`applying a positive voltage to the gate. Since the effect
`of this is a decrease in the concentration of holes near
`the silicon surface and an increase in the electron con-
`centration, the equilibria (2) and (3) shift to the left
`and the equilibria (4) and (5) to the right. This means
`that the donor states tend to becomeneutral(if they
`were not neutral already) and the acceptorstates nega-
`tive. The build-up of negative charge in the surface
`states means that the mobile charge entering the bulk
`ofthe silicon is less than the total induced charge. Con-
`sequently the threshold voltage, required for inversion,
`is higher than expected, and on increasing the gate
`voltage the subsequent increase in the inversion charge
`(and hence in the current through the transistor) is
`lower, and the transconductanceis therefore affected.
`Theeffect of the surfacestates is illustrated in fig. 4,
`which shows the Ja-Vgs curves for the experimental
`MOStransistors that all have the same dimensions but
`were annealed in different gas atmospheres after
`forming thé gate oxide in an extremely dry atmosphere
`at about 1100 °C. During the anneal, the temperature
`was kept
`low (450 °C) compared with the normal
`growth temperature of SiOz on Si (1000°C or
`higher), so that the processing steps could cause no
`difference in oxide thickness. They did, however, give
`rise to differences in the numbers of surface states,
`as may be shown from the threshold voltages and
`transconductances.
`In fact a hydrogen atmosphere
`and water vapour in an atmosphere of wet nitrogen
`even lead to negativethreshold voltages and thus ap-
`pear to remove the surface states for the most part.
`Water vapour in an oxygen atmosphere has consider-
`ably less effect. This suggests that a reduction of water
`to hydrogen plays an important part in the process.
`This hypothesis seems to be confirmed by the experience
`
`Page 4 of 13
`
`that the treatment in wet nitrogen is most effective
`when the chip is heated to a high temperature in an
`inert gas immediatély after the silicon is oxidized. This
`treatment
`reduces the oxygen content of the SiOz
`through the influence of the silicon beneath it.
`The simplest explanation for the disappearance ofthe
`surface states is a chemical reaction of hydrogen with
`the centres involved, i.e. the formation of SiH groups
`in our model. This explanation has been confirmed by
`infra-red absorption measurements[8], With the aid of
`a sensitive method of measurement it has been shown
`that
`the SiOz almost
`invariably contains a certain
`number of SiH groups, whose concentration is par-
`ticularly high when the oxidized surface is subjected to
`operations which reduce the numberof surfacestates.
`Often very little water vapour is sufficient to reduce
`the numberof surface states; a heat treatment in an
`inert gas (e.g. nitrogen or helium) which is not extreme+
`ly dry (containing a few ppm of water) maybeeffec-
`tive. It is also found that treatmentin a fairly dry en-
`vironment mayalso be highly effective if there is a base-
`metal electrode (e.g. of aluminium) on thesilicon sur-
`face. Here again the surface states underthe electrode
`disappear uponheating. It is assumed thatin this case
`a reaction of the metal with traces of water produces
`sufficient hydrogen.
`
`25mMA
`
`20
`[N,b-H,0)
`
`He]
`
`S
`
`O,+H,,0) 0
`
`-30
`
`0
`
`50
`
`Fig. 4. The Ju-Vgs characteristics of a number of geometrically
`identical MOStransistors which have been processedin different
`gas atmospheres after the chips had been oxidized.
`
`

`

`1970, No. 7/8/9
`
`MOS TECHNOLOGY
`
`229
`
`the oxide layer. The sodium atom breaks the bond
`Wemaytherefore conclude that the structure of the
`between an oxygen andasilicon atom,anditself forms
`interface is generally very dependent on the crystal
`a bond with the oxygen atom. Asa result, one ofthe
`orientation ofthe silicon, on the method of growing
`valence electrons of the silicon loses its bond, and as
`the oxide and on the subsequent
`treatments. Many
`this electron is easily released, a positively charged
`experiments can be explained on the assumption that
`centre is formed.
`the silicon bonds are or are not saturated with hydro-
`the interface may conceivably be
`The sodium at
`gen. We can becertain, however,that this does not give
`replaced by otheralkali metals and even by hydrogen.
`a complete description of the interface. A more exact
`This may perhaps explain why, even underfairly clean
`theory would have to take into account, for example.
`conditions, oxidation in steam gives rise to more oxide
`the occurrence of SiOH groups and particularly the
`charge than oxidation in dry oxygen. On the other
`influence of other
`impurities (whether deliberately
`hand, it has also been observed that heating in hydro-
`introduced or not) on theinterface structure. We shall
`return to this in the next section.
`
`
`
`'
`4;
`y
`(4r
`
`/f
`

`
`7
`
`19 3
`10~cm
`Na
`
`108
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LOOWUGD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fig. 5. Distribution of the concentration of Na atoms in the
`oxide as a function ofthe distance x from the silicon; the hatched
`urea indicates the scatter of the measuring results.
`
`a O.
`
`0
`O
`Si +0. NapSi +0
`O
`° 0.
`
`O
`
`O
`
`2 025102 Ng, Si20
`
`0
`
`0
`
`Fig. 6. a) The location of a sodium atom in SiOe. The sodium
`atom breaks the bond between a silicon and an oxygen atom,
`and as a result one of the valence electrons of the silicon loses
`its bond;
`this electron is easily released and leaves behind a
`positive charge. b) A hydrogen atom can introduce an SiH group
`in SiOz. In this group the hydrogen atom forms a homopolar
`bond with thesilicon and there is no longer an unpaired electron.
`
`(8] These measurements were carried out by Dr. K. H. Beckmann
`and T. Tempelmann of the Philips Hamburg laboratories:
`see K. H. Beckmann and N. J. Harrick, J. Electrochem.
`Soc. 118, 614-619, 1971 (No. 4).
`
`Positive charge at the oxidejsilicon interface
`Anyone assumingthat all the difficulties are resolved
`by a Suitable after-treatment that reduces the number
`of surface states to a negligible value will be surprised
`by the result that, although the /a-Vgs curve has ap-
`proximately the theoretically expected shape after such
`a treatment, the threshold voltage often has a value less
`positive (or more negative) than was expected.
`Indeed, the N-channel MOStransistors offig. 4 have
`a negative threshold voltage after treatment in hydro-
`gen or wet nitrogen; in other words, they already have
`an inversion channel when the gate voltage is zero.
`This effect cannot be explained in terms of the surface
`states, since they have the very effect of opposing the
`inversion,
`Wemust therefore assume that there are other cen-
`tres present in addition to the ones we have mentioned.
`It is usually supposed that the effect is caused by the
`presence of positively charged centres in the oxide
`immediately adjacent to the silicon surface, although
`these are difficult to distinguish experimentally from
`ionized donor centres in the silicon near the surface.
`The amountofoxide charge, like the numberof surface
`states described above, is connected with the interface
`-structure. Again, with identical processing, the oxidized
`(100) planeis foundto give the lowest oxide charge, and
`the (111) plane the highest. Impurities have an impor-
`tant effect, particularly sodium. It has been clearly
`demonstrated [7] that the presence of sodium during
`oxidation can have a marked effect on the amount of
`charge, although the crystal orientation still remains
`important. It has been shown by neutron-activation
`analysis that the sodium hasa distribution in the oxide
`like thatillustrated infig. 5. Most of the sodium can be
`seento lie in the top layer of the oxide, but there is also
`an accumulation at the interface with the silicon. The
`position of sodium in the oxide structure may perhaps
`best be represented as in fig. 6a. This structure may
`be regarded as a somewhat reduced oxide structure,
`which is also to be expected on the silicon side of
`
`Page 5 of 13
`
`

`

`230
`
`PHILIPS TECHNICAL REVIEW
`
`VOLUME 31
`
`gen or in water vapour — particularly at Jess elevated
`temperature (600 °C) — may cause the charge to de-
`crease. Here again, the formation of SiH may be ex-
`pected,resulting for examplein the structureillustrated
`in fig. 66. The hydrogen atom now forms a homopolar
`bondwith the silicon atom, and this no longer has an
`unpaired electron. |
`Fixed negative charge has sometimes been found. It
`can becaused byat least one impurity — gold, which is
`often present in small quantities. Gold is also readily
`maderadioactive by neutron activation and its presence
`demonstrated in this way.
`Thepresence of sodium and of other impurities may
`have a variety of causes. The impurities may come from
`the chemicals used or from the quartz glass tubes in
`which the oxidations are carried out. Another impor-
`tant source may be dust; if this settles on hot quartz
`tubes, sodium ions mayeasily enter the tube by diffu-
`sion and thus mix with the oxidizing gas. To achieve
`good process control it is therefore important to use
`pure chemicals and to protect the quartz tube from
`dust. Where extremely clean oxides are required, water-
`cooled quartz tubes maybe used, and thesilicon chip
`may then be heated by induction heating.
`
`Forthe control of the oxide charge, cleanliness is not the only
`important consideration, and indeed it may not always be neces-
`sary; what is particularly important, as in the case of the surface
`states, is the gas atmosphere. An oxidizing atmosphere increases
`the oxide charge, especially when the temperatureis relatively
`low (the effect is shown for example in fig. 4, where heating at
`450 °C in oxygen does not in fact give a transistor of the de-
`pletion type — because there are so many surfacestates opposing
`inversion — but it does clearly alter the threshold voltage in the
`negative direction, by 15 volts). This effect of oxygen is not yet
`sufficiently understood. It is undoubtedly related to the oxidation
`mechanism: perhaps the, oxygen at the upper surface attracts
`electrons which are then generated by structural change of the
`oxide/silicon interface. It is also conceivable that traces of im-
`purities again play an important part: the transport of hydrogen
`from theinterface towards the supplied oxygen is a likely possi-
`bility, which could cause the structure in fig. 66 to change for
`example to that in fig. 6a. In any case the significance for the
`technologistis that to obtain a low oxide charge hewill have to
`end the oxidation in one way or another by tempering ina non-
`oxidizing gas.
`
`Depending on the process used, the oxide charge is
`found to have a value ranging from less than 10!9 to
`more than 1013 unit charges per cm2. At an oxide
`thickness of say 0.2 wm, this means a change in the
`threshold voltage with respect to the theoretical value
`ranging from less than 0.1 V to more than 100 V.
`Process control has now advanced to a stage where
`variation of the oxide charge with a tolerance of 101°
`charges per cm? is quite feasible. One ofthe results of
`the presenceof the positive oxide charge wasthat it was
`
`originally very difficult to make N-channel MOStran-
`sitors that did not already have an inversion channelat
`zero gate voltage in the absence ofsurface states. This
`is the main reason why most MOScircuits have been
`(and still are) made with transistors of the P-channel
`type: here of course the presence of oxide charge only
`meansthat the threshold voltage is rather more nega-
`tive, since P-channel transitors are always of the en-
`hancement type.
`oF
`
`Determination of oxide charge and surface states by meas-
`urement of the MOScapacitance
`
`Information about the nature.and number of the surfacestates
`can be obtained bya.c. circuit measurements that determine how
`the effective capacitance of the capacitor formed by gate, oxide
`layer and substrate depends on the applied d.c. voltage. A number
`of measurements have been made on MOSconfigurations spe-
`cially designed for the purpose, with the metal contact on the
`oxide much greater than the gate of a transistor but small with
`respect to the dimensionsof the silicon wafer, which wasentirely
`covered on the otherside by a metal substrate contact. These con-
`figurations might be referred to as MOScapacitors ( fig. 7). The
`
`
`
`
`the ter-
`Fig. 7. MOS capacitor. The capacitance measured at
`minals is that of the series arrangement of Csiog and Csi. The
`magnitude of Cs; depends on the applied d.c. voltage.
`
`Fig. 8. Variation of the capacitance C of a MOScapacitor (on
`P-type silicon) with the applied d.c. voltage Vgs in the theoretical
`case where there are no surface states and no oxide charge. In
`this case the energy bands at Vgs = 0 are not bent and the capac-
`itance measuredis the flat-band capacitance Cr. The MOS capac-
`itor has a capacitance equal to Csiog When thesilicon directly
`beneath the oxide is a good conductor. This can be demonstrated
`quite clearly with low-frequency a.c. voltages (curve LF), but at
`higher frequencies the agreement is not so good (HF).
`
`Page 6 of 13
`
`

`

`1970, No. 7/8/9
`
`MOS TECHNOLOGY
`
`231
`
`to about Csio,, but at higher frequencies C remains small. This
`capacitance C measuredat a particular frequency may be regarded
`is because the supply and removalof charge carriers in the inverted
`as the resultant of the series configuration of a capacitance Csio,
`layer of an MOS capacitor cannottake place fast enough at such
`across the oxide layer and a capacitance Csi, which is related to
`high frequencies. In MOS transistors this effect is not so pro-
`the fact that the charge on the lower “plate” of the capacitor has
`nounced,
`the inverted layer here being connected with source
`the form of a space-charge cloud in the silicon. We may write:
`and drain diffusion.
`boot
`Two typical examples of the results of capacitance measure-
`C
` Csiog
`Csi
`ments can beseen in fig. 9a and b. These measurements were not
`made on MOScapacitors but on MOS transistorsspecially made
`If Csidg >>Csi, then C x Csi; if Csi > Csidg then C Csiog-
`for the purpose, since it was also required to measure the drain
`In these equations Csio, is a constant, but Cs; depends on the
`current Jag. This is also included in the figures. The transistors
`thickness of the depletion layer, that is to say on the applied
`on which the measurements represented in fig. 9a and fig. 9b were
`voltage and on the doping concentration of the silicon.
`carried out had the same shape and dimensions and were made
`If there is no oxide charge and there are no surface states, we
`on P-type substrates having the same conductivity (50 Qcm).
`may expect the relation between C and Vgs in a MOSconfigura-
`There wasonlyaslight difference in the production process: after
`tion on a P-type substrate to be represented by curves like those
`oxidation (16 hours at 1200 °C in oxygen) and a phosphorus
`in fig. 8. This figure also applies to N-type material, provided
`diffusion (4 hours at 1150 °C in dry nitrogen) the transistor of
`the positive and negative Vgs scales are interchanged.
`
`28pF
`
`28pFy 26
`
`c
`
`24
`
`22
`-30
`
`~-20
`
`10
`qy sat
`
`05
`
`!
`!
`
`[t V
`
`,
`
`10
`
`0
`20V
`
`0
`-10
`—> i,
`a
`
`
`
`Fig. 9. Variation of the gate capacitance C with the d.c. voltage Vgs in an N-channel MOS
`transistor. a) After oxidation, the transistor was processed in wet nitrogen. From thecal-
`culated flat-band capacitance Cy it follows that the flat-band voltage Vr is —12 V. The thresh-
`old voltage Vin of this transistor is —6 V, as appears from the J sat-Vgs characteristic.
`6) Here the transistor has not undergone treatment in wet nitrogen, and consequently sur-
`face states are present at the SiQe/Si interface. The flat-band voltage Vr is —30 V, the thresh-
`old voltage Vin is +80 V.
`
`The nature of the curves may be explained in qualitative terms
`as follows. In the case of a P-type substrate a negative charge
`on the measuring electrode of the MOS capacitor would increase
`the hole concentration at the surface. Charge variations caused
`by the a.c. signal used for measurement then occur so close to
`the interface that Cs: is relatively large and C is approximately
`equal to Csio,. If the negative voltage on the electrode is allowed
`to approach zero, then these charge variations gradually occur
`less close to the interface and Csi becomes smaller. As a result
`the measured capacitanceis also lower. If Vgs is raised to positive
`values, this process continues until the threshold voltage is reached
`and inversion takes place at the surface.
`The values of C found when Vs is raised still further depend
`on the frequency at which the measurement is made. At low
`frequencies (below about 100 Hz)C increases with rising Vgs up
`
`fig. 9a was subjected to heat treatment at 450 °C for a further
`30 minutes in wet nitrogen before the electrode metal was de-
`posited.
`The oxide layer was 1.2 um thick in both transistors, and for
`the substrate conductivity of 50 Qcm the threshold voltage Vin
`should be +6 V whenall other effects are neglected. As can be
`seen in fig. 9a, the threshold voltage is —6 V, i.e. 12 V lower.
`If the sum of the oxide charge and the charge present in the sur-
`face states at the threshold voltage is put at Ni elementary charges
`e per cm, we can calculate Nt from the expression:
`
`Ne = —CoxAl Vin,
`
`where A Vin is the change in Vin caused by the positive charge,
`i.e. —12 V in the present case. We then arrive at Ny = 2x 1011
`positive charges per cm?.
`
`Page7 of13
`
`
`Page 7 of 13
`
`

`

`232
`
`PHILIPS TECHNICAL REVIEW
`
`VOLUME 31
`
`From the shape of the curves offig. 9a it can be shown that
`near the interface. It is known that electric conduction
`the positive charge in this transistor must be situated almost
`in vitreous materials, such as SiOoe,
`is often due to
`entirely inthe oxide, and that the charge in the surfacestatesis
`alkali ions. Turning again to fig. 5, we see that there is
`negligible in this case. Now let us return for a moment to fig. 8.
`a relatively large amount of sodium present in the ox-
`This shows the variation of C with Ves for the theoretical case
`in which there are no surface states and no oxide charges. In this
`ide, particularly in the top layer. If all this sodium were
`case, for a gute voltage of Vgs s= 0 the energy bands in the energy-
`to be driven towards the oxide/silicon interface when
`band diagram of the MOStransistor are not curved !2), and C
`a positive voltage was applied, this would giverise to
`has a value Cr that can becalculated from the oxide thickness
`a concentration of about 10'% positive elementary
`and the substrate doping. [f oxide charges do exist, they cause
`charges per cm? (at an oxide thickness of 0.2 um this
`band curvature at zero gate voltage, and a negative gate voltage
`Vr; is then required to removethe band curvature and obtain the
`would mean a change of100 V in the threshold voltage).
`flat-band capacitance Cy, If we calculate this for a given transistor
`Such large changes are not generally found, however,
`we can use the measured C-Vgs curve to find the magnitude of
`and also the absence ofanysignificant instability when
`V; for that transistor. The voltage Vr is a measure of the oxide

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket