Filed: February 16, 2017
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________________
`
`GOOGLE INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`BLACKBERRY LTD.
`Patent Owner
`
`____________________
`
`Patent No. 8,713,466
`
`____________________
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,713,466
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Petition for Inter Partes Review
`Patent No. 8,713,466
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 1 
`
`
`I. 
`
`II.  MANDATORY NOTICES UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.8 ................................... 1 
`
`III.  PAYMENT OF FEES ..................................................................................... 1 
`
`IV.  GROUNDS FOR STANDING ........................................................................ 2 
`
`V. 
`
`PRECISE RELIEF REQUESTED AND GROUNDS RAISED ..................... 2 
`
`VI.  LEVEL OF ORDINARY SKILL IN THE ART ............................................. 3 
`
`VII.  CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ............................................................................ 4 
`
`VIII.  DETAILED EXPLANATION OF GROUNDS .............................................. 4 
`A.  Ground 1: Cadiz Renders Obvious Claims 1, 4, 6, 12-14, 17, 22, and
`24 ........................................................................................................... 4 
`
`1. 
`
`2. 
`
`3. 
`
`4. 
`
`5. 
`
`6. 
`
`7. 
`
`8. 
`
`Claim 1 ........................................................................................ 4 
`
`Claim 4 ...................................................................................... 31 
`
`Claim 6 ...................................................................................... 32 
`
`Claim 12 .................................................................................... 33 
`
`Claim 13 .................................................................................... 35 
`
`Claim 14 .................................................................................... 37 
`
`Claim 17 .................................................................................... 40 
`
`Claim 22 .................................................................................... 40 
`
`Claim 24 .................................................................................... 43 
`9. 
`B.  Ground 2: Cadiz and Hawkins Render Obvious Claims 2, 3, 15, and
`23 ......................................................................................................... 43 
`
`1. 
`
`Claim 2 ...................................................................................... 43 
`
`
`
`i
`
`

`

`Petition for Inter Partes Review
`Patent No. 8,713,466
`Claim 3 ...................................................................................... 47 
`
`Claim 15 .................................................................................... 48 
`
`2. 
`
`3. 
`
`Claim 23 .................................................................................... 49 
`4. 
`C.  Ground 3: Cadiz and Siedlikowski Render Obvious Claims 7-9, 18,
`19, and 25 ............................................................................................ 50 
`
`1. 
`
`2. 
`
`3. 
`
`4. 
`
`5. 
`
`Claim 7 ...................................................................................... 50 
`
`Claim 8 ...................................................................................... 53 
`
`Claim 9 ...................................................................................... 54 
`
`Claim 18 .................................................................................... 56 
`
`Claim 19 .................................................................................... 57 
`
`Claim 25 .................................................................................... 57 
`6. 
`D.  Ground 4: Cadiz and Yamadera Render Obvious Claims 5, 10, 11, 16,
`20, 21, and 26 ...................................................................................... 58 
`
`1. 
`
`2. 
`
`3. 
`
`4. 
`
`5. 
`
`6. 
`
`7. 
`
`Claim 5 ...................................................................................... 58 
`
`Claim 10 .................................................................................... 61 
`
`Claim 11 .................................................................................... 66 
`
`Claim 16 .................................................................................... 67 
`
`Claim 20 .................................................................................... 68 
`
`Claim 21 .................................................................................... 68 
`
`Claim 26 .................................................................................... 69 
`
`IX.  CONCLUSION .............................................................................................. 70 
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ii
`
`

`

`Petition for Inter Partes Review
`Patent No. 8,713,466
`
`TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
`
` Page(s)
`
`passim
`
`3
`
`3
`
`2
`
`1
`
`4
`
`Federal Cases
`KSR Int’l Co. v. Teleflex Inc.,
`550 U.S. 398 (2007)
`Federal Statutes
`35 U.S.C. § 102(b)
`
`35 U.S.C. § 102(e)
`
`35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
`Regulations
`37 C.F.R. § 42.8
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.100(b)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`iii
`
`

`

`Petition for Inter Partes Review
`Patent No. 8,713,466
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LIST OF EXHIBITS
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,713,466
`
`Declaration of Dr. Dan R. Olsen Jr.
`
`Curriculum Vitae of Dr. Dan R. Olsen Jr.
`
`Prosecution History of U.S. Patent No. 8,713,466
`
`Prosecution History of U.S. Patent No. 8,402,384
`
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2002/0186257
`(“Cadiz”)
`U.S. Patent No. 7,007,239 (“Hawkins”)
`U.S. Patent No. 6,741,232 (“Siedlikowski”)
`U.S. Patent Publication No. 2002/0123368 (“Yamadera”)
`U.S. Patent No. 7,454,714 (“Totman”)
`European Patent Application No. EP1265157 (“Cadiz-EP”)
`Caroline Rose et al., “Inside Macintosh Volume 1” (1985)
`“Macintosh Human Interface Guidelines,” Apple Computer,
`Inc. (1995)
`
`Prosecution History of European Patent Application No.
`06125884.4
`
`
`
`iv
`
`1001
`
`1002
`
`1003
`
`1004
`
`1005
`
`1006
`
`1007
`
`1008
`
`1009
`
`1010
`
`1011
`
`1012
`
`1013
`
`1014
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Petition for Inter Partes Review
`Patent No. 8,713,466
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Google Inc. (“Petitioner”) requests inter partes review (“IPR”) and
`
`cancellation of claims 1-26 (“the challenged claims”) of U.S. Patent No. 8,713,466
`
`(“the ’466 patent”) (Ex.1001), which is purportedly assigned to BlackBerry
`
`Limited (“Patent Owner” or “PO”).
`
`II. MANDATORY NOTICES UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.8
`Real Party-in-Interest: Petitioner identifies Google Inc. as the real party-in-
`
`interest.
`
`Related Matters: The ’466 patent is at issue in BlackBerry Ltd. v. BLU
`
`Prods. Inc., Case No. 1:16-cv-23535 (S.D. Fla.). Petitioner is concurrently filing an
`
`IPR petition challenging all claims of parent U.S. Patent No. 8,402,384.
`
`Counsel and Service Information: Lead counsel for Petitioner is Naveen
`
`Modi (Reg. No. 46,224), and Backup counsel are (1) Joseph E. Palys (Reg. No.
`
`46,508), (2) Phillip Citroën (Reg. No. 66,541), and (3) Arvind Jairam (Reg. No.
`
`62,759). Service information is Paul Hastings LLP, 875 15th St. N.W.,
`
`Washington, D.C., 20005, Tel.: 202.551.1700, Fax: 202.551.1705, email: PH-
`
`Google-Blackberry-IPR@paulhastings.com. Petitioner consents
`
`to electronic
`
`service.
`
`III. PAYMENT OF FEES
`
`The required fees are submitted herewith. The PTO is authorized to charge
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Petition for Inter Partes Review
`Patent No. 8,713,466
`any additional fees due during this proceeding to Deposit Account No. 50-2613.
`
`IV. GROUNDS FOR STANDING
`
`Petitioner certifies that the ’466 patent is available for IPR and Petitioner is
`
`not barred or estopped from requesting this IPR.
`
`V.
`
`PRECISE RELIEF REQUESTED AND GROUNDS RAISED
`
`Claims 1-26 of the ’466 patent should be canceled as obvious on the
`
`following grounds and prior art:
`
`Ground 1: Claims 1, 4, 6, 12-14, 17, 22, and 24 are obvious under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 103(a) in view of U.S. Patent Publication No. 2002/0186257 (“Cadiz”)
`
`(Ex.1006);
`
`Ground 2: Claims 2, 3, 15, and 23 are obvious under § 103(a) in view of
`
`Cadiz and U.S. Patent No. 7,007,239 (“Hawkins”) (Ex.1007);
`
`Ground 3: Claims 7-9, 18, 19, and 25 are obvious under § 103(a) in view of
`
`Cadiz and U.S. Patent No. 6,741,232 (“Siedlikowski”) (Ex.1008); and
`
`Ground 4: Claims 5, 10, 11, 16, 20, 21, and 26 are obvious under § 103(a)
`
`in view of Cadiz and U.S. Patent Publication No. 2002/0123368 (“Yamadera”)
`
`(Ex.1009).
`
`The ’466 patent is a continuation of U.S. Patent No. 8,402,384 (“the ’384
`
`patent”), which was filed on November 9, 2004. For purposes of this proceeding,
`
`Petitioner assumes the earliest effective filing date of the ’466 patent is no earlier
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Petition for Inter Partes Review
`Patent No. 8,713,466
`than the November 9, 2004 filing date of the ’384 patent. Cadiz was published on
`
`December 12, 2002. Yamadera was published on September 5, 2002. Therefore,
`
`Cadiz and Yamadera are prior art at least under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. § 102(b).
`
`Hawkins was filed on October 14, 2001. Siedlikowski was filed on January
`
`23, 2002. Therefore, Hawkins and Siedlikowski are prior art at least under pre-AIA
`
`35 U.S.C. § 102(e).
`
`Hawkins, Siedlikowski, and Yamadera were not considered during
`
`prosecution. A counterpart of Cadiz, EP1265157 (“Cadiz-EP”) (Ex.1011), is listed
`
`on the face of the ’384 patent, but was not discussed or relied upon for any claim
`
`rejection during prosecution. During prosecution of European Application No.
`
`06125884.4, which involved claims with similar limitations as the ’466 patent, the
`
`applicant was unable to overcome rejections based on Cadiz-EP. (Ex.1014, 22-25,
`
`160, 161, 165-66.)
`
`VI. LEVEL OF ORDINARY SKILL IN THE ART
`
`A person of ordinary skill in the art (POSA) at the time of the alleged
`
`invention of the ’466 patent would have had an undergraduate degree in computer
`
`science, electrical engineering, or equivalent thereof, and at least two years of
`
`experience in the relevant field, e.g., graphical user interfaces. (Ex.1002, ¶¶13-14.)
`
`More education can supplement practical experience and vice versa.1
`
`1 Petitioner submits the supporting declaration of Dr. Dan R. Olsen Jr. (Ex.1002,
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Petition for Inter Partes Review
`Patent No. 8,713,466
`
`VII. CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`
`Because the ’466 patent will not expire before issuance of a final written
`
`decision, for purposes of this proceeding, the claims of the ’466 patent should be
`
`given their broadest reasonable construction. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.100(b). All the
`
`terms in the challenged claims should be interpreted in accordance with their plain
`
`and ordinary meaning under the broadest reasonable interpretation standard.2
`
`VIII. DETAILED EXPLANATION OF GROUNDS3
`A. Ground 1: Cadiz Renders Obvious Claims 1, 4, 6, 12-14, 17, 22,
`and 24
`1.
`Claim 1
`a)
`“A method for displaying preview information, the
`method comprising:”
`To the extent the preamble is limiting, Cadiz discloses the limitations
`
`¶¶1-12; Ex.1003.) For purposes of this proceeding, the time of the alleged
`
`invention includes the mid-to-late 2004 time frame up to the November 9, 2004
`
`filing date of the ’384 patent.
`
`2 Any claim interpretations submitted or implied herein for the purpose of this
`
`proceeding are not binding upon Petitioner in any litigation involving the ’466
`
`patent. Moreover, Petitioner does not concede that the challenged claims are not
`
`invalid for reasons not raised herein.
`
`3 An overview of the technical background, the ’466 patent, and the prior art is
`
`provided by Dr. Olsen. (Ex.1002, ¶¶15-23, 25-36.)
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Petition for Inter Partes Review
`Patent No. 8,713,466
`therein. (Ex.1002, ¶¶25-31, 38-41.) For example, Cadiz discloses that “the
`
`invention includes a computing device” 100 (Ex.1006, ¶[0050]), which includes an
`
`output device 116, “such as a display” (id., ¶[0054], FIG. 1). (Ex.1002, ¶¶38-39.)
`
`Additionally, Cadiz describes “implementing
`
`the peripheral awareness
`
`interface…on any conventional display device 260.” (Ex.1006, ¶[0074], FIG. 2;
`
`Ex.1002, ¶39.)
`
`
`
`Cadiz discloses displaying a GUI on the display, e.g., as shown in FIGS. 8A-
`
`8C and 10. (Ex.1002, ¶40.) The GUIs include “preview information,” such as
`
`information about the availability of a person in FIG. 8A and about received emails
`
`in FIG. 10. (See Parts VIII.A.1.b, VIII.A.1.d; Ex.1002, ¶41.) Accordingly, Cadiz
`
`discloses a method for displaying preview information. (Ex.1002, ¶41; see also
`
`analysis below for the remaining elements of claim 1.)
`
`b)
`
`“displaying on a display dynamic preview information in
`a dynamic bar, the dynamic preview information being
`determined from information managed by a software
`application, the dynamic preview information being
`updated to reflect a change to the information managed
`by the software application; and”
`Cadiz discloses these features. (Ex.1002, ¶¶42-62.) As discussed above in
`
`Part VIII.A.1.a, Cadiz discloses a display. (Ex.1006, ¶¶[0050], [0054], [0074],
`
`FIGS. 1-2.) Cadiz describes displaying a “sidebar” (“dynamic bar”) on the display,
`
`which “host[s] one or more columns of items in a persistent interactive display
`
`strip along one edge of a conventional display device.” (Ex.1006, ¶[0070]; see also
`5
`
`
`
`

`

`Petition for Inter Partes Review
`Patent No. 8,713,466
`id., ¶¶[0071]-[0073], [0077]-[0081], [0089], [0095]-[0099], [0167], [0176]-[0178],
`
`[0190]-[0195], [0197], [0201], [0203], FIGS. 2, 3, 4A, 5, 6A-6B, 8A, 10; Ex.1002,
`
`¶43.) For example, FIG. 5 shows an “exemplary user interface” with “at least one
`
`sidebar 505…for displaying iconized tickets.” (Ex.1006, ¶[0191], FIG. 5.) The
`
`sidebar is bar-shaped, consistent with the “dynamic bar” described in the ’466
`
`patent. (See, e.g., Ex.1001, 7:17-19 (“dynamic bar 304 may lie…vertically”),
`
`FIGS. 3, 5.)
`
`
`
`The sidebar is dynamic because it “automatically provid[es] dynamic
`
`communication access and information awareness” on the display. (Ex.1006,
`
`¶[0016]; see also id., ¶¶[0017], [0059], [0063], [0076], [0084], [0103], [0115],
`
`[0167], [0170]-[0172], [0182]-[0185], [0197]-[0198], [0201], [0203]; Ex.1002,
`
`¶44.) For example, “specified communications contacts and informational
`
`elements are dynamically tracked or received and provided to a user on an ongoing
`
`basis.” (Ex.1006, ¶[0063].)
`
`Cadiz provides examples of how the interface of FIG. 5 can be implemented
`
`to display preview information in the sidebar (“dynamic bar”). (Ex.1002, ¶45.) One
`
`example is a person-centric interface, as described with, e.g., FIGS. 6B and 8A-C.
`
`Another example is an email-centric interface, as described with, e.g., FIG. 10.
`
`Both exemplary interfaces can be shown in the same sidebar. (Ex.1006, FIGS. 6B,
`
`8A-C, 10; Ex.1002, ¶45.) Each of these example interfaces independently discloses
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`Petition for Inter Partes Review
`Patent No. 8,713,466
`
`the features of limitation 1.b.
`
`PERSON-CENTRIC INTERFACE
`
`“displaying on a display dynamic preview information in a dynamic
`bar”
`FIGS. 6B and 8A-C illustrate a person-centric interface for interacting with
`
`communications contacts. For example, FIGS. 6B and 8A each illustrate a
`
`“sidebar” that provides a “peripheral awareness interface” containing multiple
`
`person items (i.e., items 610, 615, and 620 of FIG. 6B; items 810, 815, and 820 of
`
`FIG. 8A).4 (Ex.1006, ¶¶[0197], [0201], FIGS. 6B, 8A.) The primary difference
`
`between the interfaces shown in FIGS. 6B and 8A is that FIG. 8A also displays
`
`“pawns” 805 associated with the person items. (Id., ¶[0201].) As shown in FIGS.
`
`6B and 8A, the sidebars are bar-shaped. (Ex.1002, ¶46.)
`
`The sidebars are also dynamic and display dynamic preview information.
`
`(Id., ¶47.) For example, the sidebar “automatically provides peripheral awareness
`
`
`4 An “item” (or “dynamic thumbnail[]”) is “a combination of a ‘ticket’ describing
`
`the information or contact of interest and a specialized ‘viewer’ for displaying...the
`
`ticket.” (Ex.1006, ¶[0017]; see also id., ¶¶[0065], [0077], [0089].) FIG. 8A
`
`illustrates person tickets/items and FIG. 10 illustrates an email ticket/item.
`
`(Ex.1006, ¶¶[0201], [0203], FIGS. 8A, 10; see also id., ¶¶[0025], [0069], [0072],
`
`[0079], [0090], [0170]-[0172], [0174], [0182], [0197], FIGS. 4B, 6A-6B.)
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`Petition for Inter Partes Review
`Patent No. 8,713,466
`of information of interest to a user” using “images or pictures of faces to represent
`
`the people embodied by the ticket.” (Ex.1006, ¶¶[0196]-[0197], FIGS. 6B, 8A; see
`
`also id., ¶¶[0019], [0061], [0182].) Cadiz explains that “the image or picture of a
`
`face for a particular person automatically changes as the communications
`
`availability or status changes,” e.g., the sidebar dynamically displays “a frontal
`
`close-up when the person is available, and a profile when the person is busy.” (Id.,
`
`¶¶[0197]-[0198], FIGS. 6B, 8A; see also id., ¶¶[0062], [0182].) Because the person
`
`items, like those shown in FIGS. 6B and 8A, automatically change in accordance
`
`with availability or status changes, the sidebars in FIGS. 6B and 8A are dynamic
`
`and display dynamic preview information. (Ex.1002, ¶47.)
`
`The sidebar shown in FIG. 8A is also dynamic and displays dynamic
`
`preview information because it further includes pawns 805, which “serve[] as an
`
`additional indicator of communications status or availability.” (Ex.1006, ¶[0201];
`
`Ex.1002, ¶48.)
`
`Such information is dynamic preview information because it includes a
`
`dynamically updated visual representation of a person’s communications
`
`availability or status instead of the more detailed communications information
`
`displayed when the user accesses a person window or activates a communications
`
`software application, as discussed directly below and with respect to claim
`
`elements 1.c-e. (See Parts VIII.A.1.c-e; Ex.1002, ¶49.)
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`Petition for Inter Partes Review
`Patent No. 8,713,466
`“the dynamic preview information being determined from information
`managed by a software application, the dynamic preview information
`being updated to reflect a change to the information managed by the
`software application”
`Cadiz discloses that the information displayed in the sidebar of FIG. 8A
`
`(“dynamic preview information”) is determined from information managed by a
`
`software application. (Ex.1002, ¶50.) For example, Cadiz describes
`
`the
`
`management of such dynamic preview information in the context of FIG. 2
`
`(annotated below), which shows services 230 (annotated in red) as an interface
`
`between items 200 (e.g., item 815 of FIG. 8A) and information sources 240.
`
`(Ex.1006, ¶¶[0074]-[0076], FIG. 2; see also id., ¶¶[0021], [0066], [0084]-[0088],
`
`[0115], [0167], [0171].)
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`

`Petition for Inter Partes Review
`Patent No. 8,713,466
`That is, each item includes “pointers to particular ‘services’ that represent
`
`any of a number of conventional means for interacting with the information or
`
`communications contacts,” wherein the “services represent shared code or
`
`functions that provide functionality for accessing, receiving, retrieving, and/or
`
`otherwise interacting with any conventional information, source of information, or
`
`communications contact.” (Ex.1006, ¶[0021]; see also id., ¶¶[0066], [0085], FIGS.
`
`2-4.) Cadiz further explains that “[c]urrent information or status is automatically
`
`either retrieved or received, i.e., either by ‘pulling’ or ‘pushing’ such information,
`
`from any one or more of a number of conventional [information] sources 240 by
`
`using the functionality associated with one or more services 230.” (Id., ¶[0084].)
`
`Accordingly, the availability or status information in the sidebar of FIG. 8A is
`
`managed by services 230. (Ex.1002, ¶51.)
`
`Cadiz explains that services 230 include software applications. (Id., ¶52.)
`
`For instance, Cadiz explains that an example of a “service” is “functionality for
`
`communicating with contacts or transferring information via any number of
`
`conventional methods, such as, for example instant messaging or peer-to-peer
`
`communications schemes” (Ex.1006, ¶¶[0022], [0067], [0086]), and identifies
`
`software applications as examples of such conventional methods and schemes. (See
`
`also id., ¶¶[0084], [0183], [0194], [0201], 8A, 8B.) For example, Cadiz explains
`
`that “applications [are] provided by these schemes.” (Id., ¶[0006] (emphasis
`
`
`
`10
`
`

`

`Petition for Inter Partes Review
`Patent No. 8,713,466
`added); see also id., ¶¶[0009]-[0010], [0058]-[0059].) Cadiz also explains that
`
`“[i]nformation about a person’s availability or state can be obtained from any
`
`conventional system such as, for example, MSN® Messenger®,” which was a
`
`well-known instant messaging software application developed by Microsoft. (Id.,
`
`¶[0185] (emphasis added); see also id., ¶[0087]; Ex.1002, ¶52.)
`
`Moreover, referring to FIG. 3, Cadiz explains that items (e.g., person item
`
`815) are created and updated in connection with a software application. (Ex.1002,
`
`¶53.) For example, Cadiz explains that “information or contacts of interest…are
`
`identified either automatically by one or more computer program applications in
`
`response to user interaction with such application programs,” and then “tickets
`
`representing the information or contacts of interest are created or modified via a
`
`ticket manager module 320.” (Ex.1006, ¶¶[0101]-[0102] (emphasis added); see
`
`also id., ¶¶[0182], [0197], [0201].) Once the tickets are created, “the present
`
`invention then automatically tracks or receives the current state of the items 200
`
`via an information and communication module 330 which, in essence, uses one or
`
`more of the previously described services for accessing and/or interacting with
`
`one or more information sources.” (Id., ¶[0103] (emphasis added).) As discussed
`
`above, such services include software applications (e.g., MSN® Messenger®).
`
`(Ex.1002, ¶53.)
`
`Accordingly, Cadiz discloses that the communications availability or status
`
`
`
`11
`
`

`

`Petition for Inter Partes Review
`Patent No. 8,713,466
`information displayed in FIG. 8A (“dynamic preview information”) is managed by
`
`a software application (e.g., MSN® Messenger®). (Id., ¶54.)
`
`Furthermore, as discussed above, Cadiz discloses, for example, “provid[ing]
`
`the user with dynamically updated status,” that preview information automatically
`
`changes as status changes, and that this automatically changed information is
`
`managed by the software application, as discussed above. (Ex.1006, ¶¶ [0059],
`
`[0201]). Therefore, Cadiz discloses that the dynamic preview information is
`
`updated to reflect a change to the information managed by the software
`
`application. (Ex.1002, ¶55.) Indeed, a POSA would have recognized that, if the
`
`dynamic preview information was not updated in such a way, the user would not
`
`have been informed of status changes. (Id.)
`
`EMAIL-CENTRIC INTERFACE
`
`“displaying on a display dynamic preview information in a dynamic
`bar”
`FIG. 10 illustrates an email-centric interface and “represents an email type
`
`ticket/item 1010 within another container/sidebar 1000.” (Ex.1006, ¶[0203].) As
`
`shown in FIG. 10, the sidebar 1000 is bar-shaped. (Ex.1002, ¶56.)
`
`The sidebar 1000
`
`is also dynamic and displays dynamic preview
`
`information, as discussed above. (Ex.1002, ¶57.) For example, Cadiz describes an
`
`interface that includes “an email ticket for watching an email inbox folder” and
`
`that “a summary of the number of messages received in the folder is preferably
`12
`
`
`
`

`

`Petition for Inter Partes Review
`Patent No. 8,713,466
`thumbnail.” (Ex.1006, ¶[0072]; see also
`id., ¶[0059]
`
`displayed
`
`in
`
`the
`
`(“dynamically updated status,” such as “email status”), [0064] (“email status”),
`
`[0067] (“monitoring an email folder”), [0025] (“number of messages”), [0069]
`
`(same), [0090] (same), [0178] (“monitoring an email inbox”).) Displaying the
`
`number of messages received in a monitored email folder—e.g., 5 new messages—
`
`is an example of displaying dynamically changing information.5 (Ex.1002, ¶57.)
`
`Such information is dynamic preview information because it dynamically
`
`displays the number of received messages instead of the more detailed message
`
`information displayed when the user accesses an email window or activates an
`
`email software application, as discussed directly below and with respect to claim
`
`elements 1.c-e. (See Parts VIII.A.1.c-e; Ex.1002, ¶58.) Indeed, displaying the
`
`number of messages received, as shown in email item 1010 of FIG. 10, is similar
`
`to how the ’466 patent describes displaying “dynamic preview information” with
`
`respect to FIG. 5 (“counts of new events 502”). (See Ex.1001, 7:51-67, FIG. 5;
`
`Ex.1002, ¶¶58-59.)
`
`
`
`5 In FIG. 10, based on the display of “5 new messages, 389 Tota[l]” in email
`
`window 1020, a POSA would have understood that “5/3” in item 1010, although
`
`partially cut off on the right side, signifies 5 new messages and 389 total messages
`
`in the “UserFeedback” folder. (Ex.1002, ¶57.)
`
`
`
`13
`
`

`

`Petition for Inter Partes Review
`Patent No. 8,713,466
`“the dynamic preview information being determined from information
`managed by a software application, the dynamic preview information
`being updated to reflect a change to the information managed by the
`software application”
`Cadiz explains that the information displayed in the sidebar of FIG. 10
`
`(“dynamic preview information”) is determined from information managed by a
`
`software application, for reasons similar to those discussed above for the person-
`
`centric interface. (Ex.1002, ¶60.) For example, as discussed above, Cadiz explains
`
`that each item (e.g., email ticket/item 1010) includes “pointers to particular
`
`‘services’ that represent any of a number of conventional means for interacting
`
`with the information or communications contacts,” and that example “services” are
`
`“functionality necessary for monitoring an email folder” and “sending or receiving
`
`email messages.” (Ex.1006, ¶¶[0021], [0022], [0067], [0086]; see also id.,
`
`¶¶[0019], [0059], [0064], [0069], [0071]-[0072], [0084], [0088], [0090], [0178],
`
`[0183]-[0184], [0187], [0194], [0203].) Such functions were known to be provided
`
`by email applications, such as Microsoft Outlook, a known software application
`
`used with Microsoft Windows, to which Cadiz is related. (Ex.1002, ¶60.)
`
`In fact, with respect to FIG. 10, Cadiz identifies an email application as a
`
`service that provides such functionalities. (Id., ¶61.) For example, by selecting an
`
`email item, “the user may interact with any message in this window in the same
`
`manner as if the messages with being accessed or viewed within the users’ email
`
`application.” (Ex.1006, ¶[0072] (emphasis added); see also id., ¶[0203].)
`14
`
`
`
`

`

`Petition for Inter Partes Review
`Patent No. 8,713,466
`Alternatively, selecting an email item “provid[es] a viewer that instantiates an
`
`instance of the user[’]s email program for purposes of displaying the
`
`tracked/watched inbox folder.” (Id., ¶[0072] (emphasis added).)
`
`Additionally, for reasons similar to those discussed above for the person-
`
`centric interface, Cadiz explains that email tickets/items are automatically created
`
`and updated in connection with a user’s interaction with a software application.
`
`(Ex.1006, ¶¶[0101]-[0103]; Ex.1002, ¶62.)
`
`c)
`
`“expanding the dynamic bar to display an expanded
`dynamic bar in response to a first input, displaying the
`expanded dynamic bar comprising:”
`Cadiz discloses these features, for example, with respect to both the person-
`
`centric interface and the email-centric interface. (Ex.1002, ¶¶63-69.) For instance,
`
`interaction with items in a sidebar “call[s] up actionable expanded information or
`
`contact windows, namely ‘enhanced tooltip windows,’ that provide further
`
`levels of detail beyond that provided by the iconized ticket thumbnail.”
`
`(Ex.1006, ¶¶[0105]-[0106] (emphasis added); see also id., ¶¶[0072], [0099],
`
`[0170], [0183]-[0184], [0186], [0193]-[0194], [0201]-[0203], FIGS. 2, 5, 8B, 10.)
`
`FIG. 5 of Cadiz illustrates examples of such windows displayed in response to an
`
`interaction with an item, including “person window” 565 and “enhanced tooltips”
`
`555. (Id., ¶¶[0193]-[0194], FIG. 5; Ex.1002, ¶63.) The person-centric interface of
`
`FIG. 8B provides an example of a person window (Ex.1006, ¶[0201]), and the
`
`
`
`15
`
`

`

`Petition for Inter Partes Review
`Patent No. 8,713,466
`email-centric interface of FIG. 10 provides an example of an enhanced tooltip (id.,
`
`¶[0203]), each of which discloses an expanded dynamic bar, as discussed in more
`
`detail below.6 (Ex.1002, ¶63.)
`
`PERSON-CENTRIC INTERFACE
`
`Cadiz explains that FIG. 8B illustrates “a dynamic person window or
`
`‘enhanced tooltip’ person window 825 accessed by selection of one of the person
`
`items 815 of FIG. 8A.” (Ex.1006, ¶[0201] (emphasis added); see also id.,
`
`¶¶[0170], [0183]-[0186], [0194].) Cadiz discloses that the selection of the person
`
`ticket/item 820 of FIG. 8A is from an input device, such as a “mouse.” (Ex.1006,
`
`¶[0050]; see also id., ¶¶[0054], [0071], [0170], [0183], [0201]; Ex.1002, ¶64.)
`
`The person window 825 is bar-shaped, as shown in FIG. 8B, consistent with
`
`the discussion of an expanded dynamic bar in the ’466 patent. (Ex.1001, 7:40-42
`
`(“Dynamic bar 304 is expanded via a…pop-up interface 407”), 8:1-7, FIGS. 4, 6;
`
`Ex.1002, ¶65.) The person window 825 also provides additional dynamic preview
`
`information beyond that displayed in the person ticket/item 825, as discussed in
`
`more detail below with respect to claim element 1.d. (See Part VIII.A.1.d; Ex.1002,
`
`6 These examples are similar to the examples of an “expanded dynamic bar”
`
`disclosed in the ’466 patent, which identifies a “pop-up interface” as an example of
`
`displaying an “expanded dynamic bar.” (Ex.1001, 7:32-34, FIGS. 4, 6; Ex.1002,
`
`¶63.)
`
`
`
`16
`
`

`

`¶65.)
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review
`Patent No. 8,713,466
`
`
`Accordingly, Cadiz discloses expanding the person item 820 (“dynamic
`
`bar”) to display the person window 825 (“expanded dynamic bar”) in response to a
`
`selection of the person item 820 (“first input”). (Ex.1002, ¶66.)
`
`EMAIL-CENTRIC INTERFACE
`
`Referring to FIG. 10, Cadiz explains that “[u]ser selection of the email
`
`ticket/item 1000 serves to expand/open an enhanced tooltip email window 1020
`
`which allows user interaction with received email as from within a typical email
`
`application.” (Ex.1006, ¶[0203] (emphasis added); see also id., ¶¶[0071]-[0072].)
`
`As discussed above for the person-centric interface, Cadiz discloses an input
`
`device for selecting items, such as email item 1010 of FIG. 10. (See Ex.1006,
`
`¶¶[0050], [0054], [0071], [0170], [0183], [0201]; Ex.1002, ¶67)
`
`The email window 1020 is bar-shaped, as shown in FIG. 10, consistent with
`
`the discussion of an expanded dynamic bar in the ’466 patent. (Ex.1001, 7:40-42,
`
`8:1-7, FIGS. 4, 6; Ex.1002, ¶68.) The email window 1020 also provides additional
`17
`
`
`
`

`

`Petition for Inter Partes Review
`Patent No. 8,713,466
`dynamic preview information beyond that displayed in the email item 1010, as
`
`discussed in more detail below with respect to claim element 1.d. (See Part
`
`VIII.A.1.d; Ex.1002, ¶68.)
`
`Accordingly, Cadiz discloses expanding the email item 1010 (“dynamic
`
`bar”) to display the email window 1020 (“expanded dynamic bar”) in response to a
`
`selection of the email item 1010 (“first input”). (Ex.1002, ¶69.)
`
`d)
`
`“displaying additional dynamic preview information
`determined from
`the
`information managed by
`the
`software application, the additional dynamic preview
`information being different from the dynamic preview
`information displayed in the dynamic bar;”
`Cadiz discloses these features for reasons similar to those discussed above
`
`for claim element 1.b and for the additional reasons discussed below, for example,
`
`with respect to both the person-centric interface and the email-centric interface.
`
`(Ex.1002, ¶¶70-78.)
`
`PERSON-CENTRIC INTERFACE
`
`Cadiz’s person window 825 of FIG. 8B (“expanded dynamic bar”) displays
`
`additional dynamic preview information that is different from the dynamic preview
`
`information displayed in the sidebar of FIG. 8A (“dynamic b