throbber
V
`
`
`
`www.pdr.net
`
`-‘
`
`P I,
`.gmq.
`‘
`
`aW
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2045 p. 1
`InnoPharma Licensing LLC V. AstraZeneca AB IPR2017-00905
`
`

`

`
`
` fl
`53
`‘ i999
`
`EDITION
`
`
`
`
`PHYSICIANS #
`DESK
`REFERENCE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Ronald Arky, MD, Charles S. Davidson Professor of Medicine and Master, Francis Weld Peabody Society, Harvard Medical School
`Vice President of Directory Services: Stephen B. Greenberg
`
`Senior Drug Information Specialist: Thomas Fleming, RPh
`Director of Product Management: David P. Reiss
`Drug Information Specialist: Maria Deutsch, MS, RPh, CDE
`Senior Product Manager: Mark A. Friedman
`Editor, Special Projects: David W. Sifton
`Associate Product Manager: Bill Shadghnessy
`Vice President of Production: David A. Pitler
`Director of Sales: Dikran N. Barsamian
`Director of Print Purchasing: Marjorie A. Duffy
`National Sales Manager: Anthony Sorce
`Director of Operations: Came wmiams
`National Account Manager: Don Bruccoleri
`Manager of Production: Kimberly H. Vivas
`A0900!“ managers:
`Senior Production Coordinators: Amy B. Brooks, Dawn McCall
`Marion Grayt RPh
`Production Coordinator: Mary: Ellen R. Breun
`L'awrence C‘ Keary
`effrey F. Pfohl
`PDR Data Manager: Jeffrey D. Schaefer
`Christopher N_ Schmidt
`Senior Format Editor: Gregory J. Westley
`Stephen M_ Silverberg
`Index Editors: Johanna M. Mazur, Robert N. ‘Woerner
`,
`Suzanne E. Yarrow, RN
`Art Associate: Joan K. Akerlind
`National Sales Manager, Trade Group: Bill Gaffney
`Senior Digital Imaging Coordinator: Shawn W. Cahill‘
`Director of Direct Marketing: Michael Bennett
`Digital Imaging Coordinator: Frank J. McElroy, lll
`Direct Marketing Manager: Lorraine M. Loening
`Electronic Publishing Designer: Robert K. Grossman
`Promotion Manager: Donna R. Lynn
`Fulfillment Managers: Stephanie DeNardi, Kenneth Siebert
`Director, Professional Support Services: Mukesh Mehta, RPh
`
`
`t
`
`_
`
`I
`
`-
`
`.
`
`v Copyright © 1999 and published by Medical Economics Company, Inc. at Montvale, NJ 07645—1742. All rights reserved. None of the content of this publication
`- may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, resold, redistributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, record-
`ing, or othenNise) without the prior written permission of the publisher. PHYSICIANS' DESK REFERENCE”, PDFl°, PDR For Nonprescription Drugs”, PDFl For
`'Ophthalmologyfi Pocket PDR", and The PDFtE Family Guide to Prescription Drugs® are registered trademarks used herein under license. PDR Companion GuideTM,
`FDR” for Herbal MedicinesTM, PDR‘” Medical Dictionary”, PDR" Nurse's Handbook“, PDR" Nurse's DictionaryTM, The PDR° Family Guide Encyclopedia of Medical
`CareTM, PDR" Electronic LibraryTM, and PDR" Drug interactions, Side Effects, Indications, Contraindications SystemTM are trademarks used herein under license.
`
`Officers of Medical Economics Company: President and Chief Executive Officer: Curtis B. Allen; Vice President, New Media: L. Suzanne BeDell; Vice President, Corporate
`Human Resources: Pamela M. Bilash; Vice President and Chief Information Officer: Steven M. Bressler; Senior Vice President, Finance, and Chief Financial Officer: Thomas
`W. Ehardt; Vice President, Directory Services: Stephen B. Greenberg; Vice President, New Business Planning: Linda G. Hope; Executive Vice President, Healthcare Publishing
`and Communications: Thomas J. Kelly; Executive Woe President, Magazine Publishing: Lee A. Maniscalco; Vice President, Group Publisher: Terrence W. Meacock; Vice
`President, Production: David A. Pitler; Vice President, Group Publisher: Thomas C. Pizor; Vice President, Magazine Business Management: Eric Schlett; Senior Vice President,
`Operations: John R. Ware
`:
`.
`
`® Printed on recycled paper
`
`,
`
`ISBN: 1563632888
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2045 p. 2
`
`

`

`
`
`CONTENTS
`
`
`
`
`
`IManufacturers’ Index. (White Pages) 1
`
`
`
`Section 1
`
`V
`
`Lists all pharmaceutical manufacturers participating in PHYSICIANS' DESK REFERENCE.
`Includes addresses, phone numbers, and emergency contacts. Shows each manufacturer’s
`products and the page number of those described in PDR.
`
`Brand and Generic Name Index (Pink Pages) 101
`
`Section 2
`Gives the page number of each product by brand and generic name.
`
`Product Category Index (Blue Pages)
`201
`
`Section 3
`
`Lists all fully described products by prescribing category. An overview of the headings
`appears on pages 201 and 202.
`
`
`Product Identification Guide (Gray Pages) 301 ’
`
`Section 4
`
`
`
`Presents full-color, actual-size photos of tablets and capsules, plus pictures of a variety of other
`dosage forms and packages. Arranged alphabetically by manufacturer.
`
`
`Product Information (White Pages) 401 1
`Section
`Includes entries for over 2,200 pharmaceuticals. Listings are
`The main section of the book.
`arranged alphabetically by manufacturer.
`'
`
`Diagnostic Product Information
`
`Section 6
`
`.
`
`3467
`
`Gives usage guidelines for a variety of common diagnostic agents. Arranged alphabetically by manufacturer.
`
`........................ ..220
`Drug Information Centers .............................................................................................
`A national directory of institutions that ansWer queries regarding drugs. Arranged alphabetically by state and city.
`Key to Controlled Substances Categories .......................
`...........................
`............................
`........... ..347
`Gives the definition of each category and the prescribing limitations that apply.
`
`Key to FDA Use-in-Pregnancy Ratings .................................................................................................... ..347
`Provides the exact interpretation of each risk/benefit rating.
`
`U.S. Food and Drug Administration Telephone Directory .............................................
`Gives numbers of key reporting programs and information services.
`
`........................... "348'
`
`Poison Control Centers ........................................................................................................................ .3478
`A national directory arranged alphabetically by state and city.
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2045 p. 3
`
`

`

`ZE NECA PHARMACEUTICALS/3425
`PRODUCT lNFORMATlON
`
`MERREM IV. is also supplied as ADD~Vantagc Vials con.
`MERREM IV.) may be stored for up to 2 hours at controlled
`To Prepare Admixture:
`room temperature 15~25°C (5977707) or for up to 12 hours
`taining sufficient meropenem to deliver 500 mg or 1 g for
`1. Squeeze the bottom of the diluent container gently to in
`intravenous administration.
`at 430 (39°F).
`flats the portion of the container surrounding the end of
`Intravenous infusion Administration
`the drug vial.
`500 rug/20 mL Injection Vial (NDC 03104332520)
`500 rug/100 mL Infusion Vial (NDC 0310032541)
`Stability in Infusion Vials: MERREM I.V. infusion vials con/
`1 g/30 mL Injection Vial (NDC 0310032130)
`stituted with Sodium Chloride Injection 0.9% (MERREM
`1 g/IOO mL Infusion Vial (NDC 0310032141)
`LV. concentrations ranging from 2.5 to 50 mg/mL) are stable
`500 rug/15 mL ADD'Vantage (NDC 0310032545)
`for up to 2 hours at controlled room temperature 15—25%?
`l g/15 mL ADD-Vantage (NDC 03104132145)
`(5547‘?) or for up to 18 hours at 4°C (39"F). Infusion vials
`of MERREM I.V. constituted with Dextrose Injection 5%
`REFERENCES
`(MERREM IV. concentrations ranging from 2.5 to 50 mg/
`1. Nations Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.
`mL) are stable for up to 1 hour at controlled room temper
`Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests
`store 15m25°C (5947“17‘) or for up to 8 hours at 4°C (3901*).
`for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically - Third Edition. Ap'
`Stability in Plastic LV. Bags: Solutions prepared for infusion
`proved Standard NCCLS Document M7«A3. Vol. 13, No.
`(MERREM IV. concentrations ranging from 1 to 20 mg/mL)
`25, NCCLS, Villanova, PA, December, 1993.
`2. Nations Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.
`may be stored in plastic intravenous bags with diluents as
`shown below:
`Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk. Suscepti-
`bility Tests 4 Fifth Edition. Approved Standard NCCLS
`Document MZ-AS, Vol. 13, No. 24. NCCLS, Villanova, PA.
`December 1993.
`3. Nations Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.
`Methods for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Ana-
`erobic Bacteria « Third Edition. Approved Standard NC
`CLS Document MILAS, Vol. 13, No. 26, NCCLS, Vill«
`anova, PA. December 1993.
`4. Cockcro DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clear-
`ance from serum creatinine. Nephron. 1976; 16.31-41.
`tADDAVan age is a registered trademark of Abbott Labora-
`tories Inc.
`MERREM® (meropenem for injection) is manufactured by:
`Sumitomo Pharmaceuticals Co. Ltd
`Dita Works
`Tsurusaki 2200
`Cita'shi
`Oita
`Japan
`Manufactured for:
`Zeneca Pharmaceuticals
`A business unit of Zeneca Inc.
`Wilmington, DE 19850-5437
`SIC 64041430
`Rev F 07/96
`Shown in Product Identification Guide, page 346
`
`
`
`NOLVADEX®
`[n01 ’va-dexl
`tamoxifen citrate
`
`DESCRIPTION
`NOLVADEX® (tamoxifen citrate) Tablets, a nonsteroidal
`antiestrogen, are for oral administration. NOLVADEX Tab—
`lets are available as:
`10 mg Tablets. Each tablet contains 15.2 mg of tamoxifen
`citrate which is equivalent to 10 mg of tamoxifen.
`20 mg Tablets. Each tablet contains 30.4 mg of tamoxifen
`citrate which is equivalent to 20 mg of tamoxifen.
`Inactive Ingredients: carboxymethylcellulose calcium, mag-
`nesium stearate, mannitol and starch.
`Chemically, NOLVADEX is the transisomer of a triphenyl.
`ethylene derivative. The chemical name is (Z)2-l4—(1,2-di~
`phenyl-lsbutenyl) phenoxylll, N-dimethylethanamine
`2~hydroxy~1,2,3—propanetricarboxylate (1:1). The structural
`and empirical formulas are:
`,
`
`(CH3)2N(CH2)ZOO O
`:
`c:c
`
`\
`
`(:sz
`
`' CsHaO7
`
`
`
`(C32H37N03)
`Tamoxifen citrate has a molecular weight of 563.62, the
`pKa’ is 8.85, the equilibrium solubility in Water at 37°C is
`0.5 mg/mL and in 0.02 N HCl at 37°C, it is 0.2 mg/mL.
`CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
`NOLVADEX is a nonsteroidal agent which has demon-
`strated potent antiestrogenic properties in animal test sys-
`tems. The antiestrogenic efl'ects may be related to its ability
`to compete with estrogen for binding sites in target tissues
`such as breast. Tamoxifen inhibits the induction of rat
`mammary carcinoma induced by dimethylbenzanthracene
`(DMBA) and causes the regression of already established
`DMBA-induced tumors. In this rat model, tamoxifen ap
`pears to exert its antitumor elfects by binding the estrogen
`receptors.
`In cytosols derived from human breast adenocarcinomas,
`tamoxifen competes with estradiol for estrogen receptor pro-
`tein.
`
`Consult 1 999 PDR® supplements and future editions for revisions
`
`Continued on next page
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2045 p. 4
`
`Number of
`Hours Stable
`at Controlled Number
`Room
`of Hours
`Temperature
`Stable
`15~25°C
`at 4"C
`
`(Learn
`era
`
`4
`1
`1
`
`l
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`1
`
`24
`4
`2
`
`2
`
`4
`
`6
`
`6
`8
`
`1
`
`3
`2
`4
`4
`2
`
`1
`
`4
`
`12
`16
`24
`1?.
`24
`
`4
`
`Sodium Chloride
`Injection 0.9%
`Dextrose Injection 5.0%
`Dextrose Injection 10.0%
`Dextrose and Sodium Chloride
`Injection 5.0%/0.9%
`Dextrose and Sodium Chloride
`Injection 5.0%l0.2%
`Potassium Chloride in
`Dextrose
`Injection 0.15%15.0%
`Sodium Bicarbonate in
`Dextrose
`Injection 0.029250%
`Dextrose Injection 5.0%
`in Normosol®-M
`Dextrose Injection 5.0%
`in Ringers Lactate Injection
`Dextrose and Sodium Chloride
`Injection 2.5%l0.45%
`Mannitol Injection 2.5%
`Ringers Injection
`Ringers Lactate Injection
`Sodium Lactate Injection 1/6 N
`Sodium Bicarbonate
`Injection 5.0%
`
`Solutions of MERREM
`Stability in Baxter Minibag Plus:
`IV. (MERREM IV. concentrations ranging from 2.5 to 20
`mg/mL) in Baxter Minibag Plus bags with Sodium Chloride
`Injection 0.9% may be stored for up to 4 hours at controlled
`room temperatures 15-—25°C (59*77°F) or for up to 24 hours
`at 4°C (39°F). Solutions of MERREM I.V. (MERREM 1.V.
`concentrations ranging from 2.5 to 20 mg/mL) in Baxter
`Minibag Plus bags with Dextrose Injection 5.0% may be
`stored up to 1 hour at controlled room temperatures 15~
`25°C (59—77°F) or for up to 6 hours at 4°C (39°F).
`Stability in Plastic Syringes, Tubing and Intravenous Infu-
`sion Sets:
`Solutions of MERREM I.V. (MERREM IV. con‘
`centrations ranging from 1 to 20 mg/mL) in Water for Injec-
`tion or Sodium Chloride Injection 0.9% (for up to 4 hours) or
`in Dextrose Injection 5.0% (for up to 2 hours) at controlled
`room temperatures 15«25°C (59—77°F) are stable in plastic
`syringes, plastic tubing. dn'p chambers, and volume control
`devices of common intravenous infusion sets.
`ADD-Vantage Vials: ADD-Vantage vials diluted in Sodium
`Chloride Injection 0.45% (MERREM I.V. concentrations
`ranging from 5 to 20 mg/mL) may be stored for up to 6 hours
`at controlled room temperature 15—25°C (59»77°F) or for 24
`hours at 4°C (39°F). ADDAVantage vials diluted in Sodium
`Chloride Injection 0.9% (MERREM I.V. concentrations
`ranging from 1-20 mg/mL) may be stored for up to 4 hours
`at controlled room temperature 15-25°C (59~77“F) or for 24
`hours at 4°C (39°F). ADD-Vantage vials diluted with Dex~
`trose Injection 5.0% (MERREM I.V. concentrations ranging
`from 1—20 mg/mL) may be stored for up to 1 hour at con»
`trolled room temperature 15~25°C (59——77°F) or for 8 hours
`at 4°C (39°F).
`NOTE: Parenteral drug products should be inspected visu'
`ally for particulate matter and discoloration prior to admin
`istration, whenever solution and container permit.
`HOW SUPPLIED
`MERREM IV. is supplied in 20 mL and 30 mL injection vi‘
`313 containing sufficient meropenem to deliver 500 mg or 1 g
`for intravenous administration, respectively. MERREM IV.
`is supplied in 100 mL infusion vials containing sufficient
`meropenem to deliver 500 mg or 1 g for intravenous admin
`istration. The dry powder should be stored at controlled
`room temperature 20—25°C (68~—77°F) [see USP].
`
`lI ll
`
`
`
`
`
`2. With the other hand, push the drug vial down into the
`container telescoping the walls of the container. Grasp
`the inner cap of the vial through the walls of the con-
`tainer. (See Figure 5.)
`
`
`
`. 3. Pull the inner cap from the drug vial. (See Figure 6.) Ver~
`ify that the rubber stopper has been pulled out and invert
`the system several times, allowing the drug and diluent
`to mix.
`
`
`
`9‘9?”
`
`4. Mix contents thoroughly and use within the specified
`time.
`Preparation For Administration: (Use Aseptic Technique)
`1. Confirm the activation and admixture of vial con‘
`tents.
`Check for leaks by squeezing container firmly. If leaks
`are found, discard unit as sterility may be impaired.
`Close flow control clamp of administration set.
`Remove cover from outlet port at bottom of container.
`Insert piercing pin of administration set into port
`with a twisting motion until the pin is firmly seated.
`NOTE: See full directions on administration set car-
`ton.
`.
`6. Lift the free end of the hanger loop on the bottom of
`the vial, breaking the two tie strings. Bend the loop
`outward to lock it in the upright position, than sus»
`pend container from hanger.
`7. Squeeze and release drip chamber to establish proper
`fluid level in chamber.
`8. Open flow control clamp and clear air from set. Close
`clamp.
`9. Attach set to venipuncture device. If device is not in-
`dwelling, prime and make venipuncture.
`10.
`Regulate rate of administration with flow control
`clamp.
`WARNING: Do not use flexible container in series connec‘
`tions.
`'
`COMPATIBILITY AND STABILITY
`Compatibility of MERREM IV. with other drugs has not
`been established. MERREM IV. should not be mixed with
`or physically added to solutions containing other drugs.
`Freshly prepared solutions of MERREM I.V. should be used
`whenever possible. However, constituted solutions of MEK
`REM I.V. maintain satisfactory potency at controlled room
`temperature 15‘2500 (59477?) or under refrigeration at
`4°C (39°F) as described below. Solutions of intravenous
`MERREM I.V. should not be frozen.
`Intravenous Bolus Administration
`MERREM I.V. injection vials constituted with sterile Water
`for Injection for bolus administration (up to 50 mg/mL of
`
`

`

`3426/ZENECA PHARMACEUTlCALS
`PHYSlClANS' DESK REFERENCE® W1.“—
`WARNINGS
`Nolvadex—«Cont.
`NSABP 809 study in women ago 50459 years, only women
`with both estrogen and progesterone receptorlevels 10 fmol
`Visual disturbance including corneal changes, cataracts and
`or greater clearly benefited, while .therewas a nonstatisti-
`*retinopathy have been reported in patients receiving
`Tamoxifen is extensively metabolized after oral administra-
`Cally significant trend toward adverse effect in women with
`NOLVADEX.
`tion. Studies in women receiving 20 mg of 1“C tamoxifen
`both estrogen and progesterone receptor levels less than 10
`As with other additive hormonal therapy (estrogens and an.
`fmol. In women age 60—70 years, there was a trend toward
`have shown that approximately 65% of the administered
`drogens), hypercalcemia has been reported in some breast
`a beneficial effect of NOLVADEX without any clear relation
`dose was excreted from the body over a period of 2 weeks
`cancer patients with bone metastases within a few weeks of
`with fecal excretion as the primary route of elimination. The
`ship to estrogen or progesterone receptor status.
`starting treatment with NOLVADEX. If hypercalcemia does
`Three prospective studies (ECOG-1178, Toronto, NATO) us
`drug was excreted mainly as polar conjugates, with un—
`occur, appropriate measures should be taken and, if severe,
`ing NOLVADEX sdjuvantly as a single agent demonstrated
`changed drug and unconjugated metabolites accounting for
`NOLVADEX should be discontinued.
`an improved diseasafree survival following total mastec-
`less than 30% of the total fecal radioactivity
`An increased incidence of endometrial cancer has been re-
`tomy and axillary dissection for postmenopausal women *
`N-desmethyl tamoxifen was the major metabolite found in
`ported in association with NOLVADEX treatment. The un‘
`with positive axillary nodes compared to placebo/no treat»
`patients’ plasma. The biological activity of N-desmethyl
`ment controls. The NATO study also demonstrated an over»
`derlying mechanism is unknown, but may be related to the
`tamoxifen appears to be similar to tamoxifen. 4-Hydroxyta»
`all survival benefit.
`estrogen-like efi'ect of NOLVADEX. Any patients receiving
`moxifcn and a side chain primary alcohol derivative of
`NSABP 3-14, a prospective, double-blind, randomized
`or having previously received NOLVADEX, who report abA
`tamoxifen have been identified as minor metabolities in
`study, evaluated NOLVADEX versus placebo in the treat-
`normal vaginal bleeding should be promptly evaluated. Pa»
`plasma.
`ment of women with axillary nodanegative, estrogenrecep
`tients receiving or having previously received NOLVADEX
`Following a single oral dose of 20 mg tamoxifen, an average
`tor positive (2 10 final/mg cytosol protein) breast cancer (as
`should have routine gynecological care and they should
`peak plasma concentration of 40 ng/mL (range 35 to 45 ng/
`adjuvant therapy, following total mastectomy and axillary
`promptly inform their physician if they experience any ab«
`mL) occurred approximately 5 hours alter dosing. The de-
`dissection, or segmental resection, axillary dissection, and
`normal gynecological symptoms, eg, menstrual irregulari»
`cline in plasma concentrations of tamoxifen is biphasic with
`breast radiation). After five years of treatment, a significant
`ties, abnormal vaginal bleeding, changes in vaginal dis—
`a terminal elimination half~life of about 510 7 days. The
`improvement in disease-free survival was demonstrated in
`charge, or pelvic pain or pressure.
`average peak plasma concentration for N-desmethyl tamox»
`women receiving NOLVADEX. This benefit was apparent
`An increased incidence of endomctrial changes including
`ifen is 15 ng/mL (range 10 to 20 ng/mL). Chronic adminis-
`both in women under age 50 and in women at or beyond age
`hyperplasia and polyps have been reported in association
`50. In this trial women who received tamoxifen for five
`tration of 10 mg tamoxifen given twice daily for three
`with NOLVADEX treatment. The incidence and pattern of
`months to patients results in average steadyvstate plasma
`years and were diseasefree at the end of this 5«year period
`’ this increase suggest that the underlying mechanism is re—
`concentrations of 120 ng/mL (range 67-183 ng/mL) for
`were offered an additional five years of NOLVADEX, or pla-
`lated to the estrogenic properties of NOLVADEX.
`tamoxifen and 336 ng/mL (range 1484554 ng/mL) for N-
`cebo in a double-blind randomized scheme. With four years
`In a large randomized trial
`in Sweden of adjuvant
`desmethyl tamom’fen. The average stealth/«state plasma con-
`of follow-up after this rerandomization, 92% of the women
`NOLVADEX 40 rug/day for 2—5 years, an increased inci-
`centrations of tamoxifen and N-dcsmethyl tamoxifen after
`that received five years of NOLVADEX followed by placebo
`dence of uterine cancer was noted. Twenty~three of 1,372
`administration of 20 mg tamoxifen once daily for three
`are alive and disease-free, compared to 86% of the women
`patients randomized to receive NOLVADEX versus 4 of
`scheduled to receive 10 years of NOLVADEX. This difiei»
`months are 122 ng/mL (range 71483 ng/mL) and 353
`1,357 patients randomized to the observation group devel‘
`ng/mL (range 152-706 ng/mL), respectively. After initiation
`once was not statistically significant. One additional ran,
`oped cancer of the uterus [RR = 5.6 (LS-16.2), p<.001]. One
`of therapy, steady state concentrations for tamoxifen are
`domized study (NATO) demonstrated improved disease-free
`of the patients with cancer of the uterus who was random- .
`achieved in about 4 weeks and steady state concentrations
`survival for NOLVADEX compared to no adjuvant therapy
`ized to receive NOLVADEX never took the drug. Alter ap‘
`for Nadesmethyl tamoxifen are achieved in about 8 weeks,
`following total mastectomy and axillary dissection in post-
`proximately 68 years of followup in the NSABP B-14 trial,
`suggesting a half-life of approximately 14 days for this me-
`menopausal women with axillary nodevncgative breast can»
`15 of 1,419 women randomized to receive NOLVADEX 20
`tabolite.
`car. In this study, the benefits of NOLVADEX appeared to be
`rug/day for 5 years developed uterine cancer and 2 of the
`In a 3-month crossover steady‘state bioavailability study
`independent of estrogen receptor status.
`1,424 women randomized to receive placebo, who subse-
`with NOLVADEX 10 mg twice a day versus NOLVADEX 20
`Three prospective, randomized studies (Inglc, Pritchard,
`quently were treated with NOLVADEX, also developed uter—
`mg given once daily,
`the results deomonstrated that
`Buchanan) compared NOLVADEX to ovarian ablation
`ine cancer. Most of the uterine cancers were diagnosed at an
`(oophorectomy or ovarian irradiation) in premenopausal
`NOLVADEX 20 mg taken once daily has comparable bio,
`early stage, but deaths from uterine cancer have been re-
`availability to NOLVADEX 10 mg taken twice a day.
`women with advanced breast cancer. Although the objective
`ported.
`response rate, time to treatment failure, and survival were
`Clinical Studies: The Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Col.
`NOLVADEX has been associated with changes in liver en-
`laborativc Group (EBCTCG) conducted worldwide over-
`similar with both treatments, the limited patient accrual
`zyme levels, and on rare occasions, a spectrum of more se-
`prevented a demonstration of equivalence. In an overview
`views of systemic adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer
`vere liver abnormalities including fatty liver, cholestasis,
`analysis of survival data from the three studies, the hazard
`in 1985 and again in 1990. In 1992, 10-year outcome data
`hepatitis and hepatic necrosis. A few of these serious cases
`ratio for death (NOLVADEX/ovarian ablation) was 1.00 with
`were reported for 29,892 women in 40 randomized trials of
`included fatalities. In most reported cases the relationship
`two‘sided 95% confidence intervals of 0.73 to 1.37. Elevated
`adjuvant tamoxifen using doses of 20-40 rug/day for 1-5+
`to NOLVADEX is uncertain. However, some positive rechaL
`years (median 2 years). Fifty~onc percent were entered into
`serum and plasma cstrogens have been obsewed in premen<
`lenges and dechallenges have been reported.
`opausal women receiving NOLVADEX. However, the data
`trials comparing tamoxifen to no adjuvant therapy and 49%
`In the Swedish trial using adjuvant NOLVADEX 40 rug/day
`were entered into trials of tamoxifen in combination with
`from the randomized studies do not suggest an adverse ef-
`for 2—5 years, 3 cases of liver cancer have been reported in
`fect. A limited number of premenopausal patients with dis-
`chemotherapy vs. the same chemotherapy alone. Twenty-
`the NOLVADEX~treated group versus 1 case in the ob—
`ease progression during NOLVADEX therapy responded to
`nine percent were <50 years of age and 71% were 250
`servation group.
`In other clinical
`trials evaluating
`subsequent ovarian ablation.
`years. Fifty-seven percent were nodepositive and 43% were
`NOLVADEX, no other cases of liver cancer have been re.
`in Sweden of adjuvant
`In a large randomized trial
`node~negative. Fifty percent of the tumors were estrogen re-
`ported to date.
`NOLVADEX 40 rug/day for 2—5 years, the incidence of sec—
`ceptor (ER) positive (210 fmol/mg), 18% were ER poor (<10
`Data from the NSABP 8-14 study show no increase in other
`ond primary breast tumors was reduced in the tamoxifen
`fmol/mg), and 32% were ER unknown.
`(nomuterine)
`cancers
`among
`patients
`receiving
`arm (p<0.05). In the NSABP B«14 trial in which patients
`The overall recurrence‘free survival at 10 years of follow—up
`NOLVADEX. However, a number of second primary tumors,
`were randomized to NOLVADEX 20 rug/day for 5 years ver»
`was 51.2% for tamoxifen versus 44.7% for control (logrank
`occurring at sites other than the endometrium, have been
`sus placebo, the incidence of second primary breast cancers
`2p <0.00001). Overall survival at 10 years was 58.8% for
`reported following the treatment of breast cancer with
`is also reduced.
`tamoxifen versus 52.6% for control (logrank 2p <0.00001).
`NOLVADEX in clinical trials. Whether an increased risk for
`Published results from 122 patients (119 evaluable) and
`Both the absolute risk of relapse and the absolute benefit of
`other (non-uterine) cancers is associated with NOLVADEX
`case reports in 16 patients (13 evaluable) treated with
`treatment with tamoxifen were greater in women with pos»
`is still uncertain and continues to be evaluated.
`NOLVADEX have shown that NOLVADEX is effective for
`itive nodes than in women with negative nodes. In women
`Pregnancy Category D: NOLVADEX may cause fetal harm
`the palliative treatment of male breast cancer. Sixtyosix of
`with positive nodes, 10-year recurrence—free survival was
`when administered to a pregnant woman. Women should be
`these 132 evaluable patients responded to NOLVADEX
`41.9% for tamoxifen versus 33.1% for control (logrank 1p
`advised not to become pregnant while taking NOLVADEX
`<0.00001). Ten-year survival was 50.4% for tamoxifen ver-
`which constitutes a 50% objective response rate.
`and should use barrier or nonhormonal contraceptive meas-
`sus 42.2% for control (logrank 1p <0.00001). In women with
`INDICATIONS AND USAGE
`ures if sexually active. Effects on reproductive functions are
`negative nodes, rccurrcnccirec survival was 68.1% for
`expected from the antiestrogenic properties of the drug. In
`Adjuvant Therapy: NOLVADEX is indicated for the treat‘
`tamoxifen versus 63.1% for control (log‘rank 1p <0.00001).
`reproductive studies in rats at dose levels equal to or below
`ment of axillary node~ncgative breast cancer in women fol»
`Survival at 10 years was 74.5% for tamoxifen versus 71.0%
`the human close, nonteratogenic developmental skeletal
`lowing total mastectomy or segmental mastectomy, axillary
`for control (logrank 1p 2 0,0002).
`changes were seen and were found reversible. In addition,
`dissection, and breast irradiation. Data are insufficient to
`The reduction in the annual odds of recurrence with tamox~
`in fertility studies in rats and in teratology studies in rab'
`predict which women are most likely to benefit and to de»
`ifen was 12% in women <50 years of age versus 29% in
`bits using doses at or below those used in humans, a lower
`termine if NOLVADEX provides any benefit in women with
`women 250 years. Similarly, the reduction in the annual
`tumors less than 1 cm.
`incidence of embryo implantation and a higher incidence of
`odds of death was 6% versus 20%. The reduction in the an.
`fetal death or retarded in utero growth were observed, with
`NOLVADEX is indicated for the treatment of node-positive
`nual Odds of recurrence with tamoxifen was significantly
`slower learning behavior in some rat pups when compared
`breast cancer in postmenopausal women following total
`greater in ER positive (32%) than in ER poor (13%) tumors
`to historical controls. Several pregnant marmosets were
`mastectomy, or segmental mastectomy, axillary dissection,
`(1p <0.00001). The reduction in recurrence and mortality
`closed during organogenesis or in the last half of pregnancy
`and breast irradiation. In some NOLVADEX adjuvant stud-
`was greater in those studies that used tamoxifen for longer
`No deformations were seen and, although the dose was high
`ies, most of the benefit to date has been in the subgroup
`(22 years) rather than shorter (<2 years) periods. There
`enough to terminate pregnancy in some animals, those that
`with 4 or more positive axillary nodes.
`was no indication that doses greater than 20 mg per day
`did maintain pregnancy showed no evidence of teratogenic
`The estrogen and progesterone receptor values may help to
`were more effective.
`malformations.
`predict whether adjuvant NOLVADEX therapy is likely to
`Two studies (liobay and NSABP B09) demonstrated an im-
`be beneficial.
`In rodent models of fetal reproductive tract development,
`proved diseasefree survival following radical or modified
`tamoxifen (at doses 0.3 to 24-fold the human maximum rec-
`Therapy for Advanced Disease: NOLVADEX is reflective in
`radical mastectomy in postmenopausal women or women 50
`the treatment of metastatic breast cancer in women and
`ommended dose on a rug/m2 basis) caused changes in both
`years of age or older with surgically curable breast cancer
`sexes that are similar to those caused by estradiol, ethy'
`men. In premenopausal women with metastatic breast can-
`with positive axillary nodes when NOLVADEX was added to
`nylcstradiol and diethylstilbestrol. Although the clinical rel-
`cer, NOLVADEX is an alternative to oophorectomy or ovar—
`adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy. In the Hubay study,
`evance of these changes is unknown, some of these changes,
`ian irradiation. Available evidence indicates that patients
`NOLVADEX was added to “lowdosc” CMF (cyclophospha.
`especially vaginal adenosis, are similar to those seen in
`whose tumors are estrogen receptor positive are more likely
`mide, methotrexatc and fluorouracil). In the NSABP 8—09
`young women who were exposed to diethylstilbestrol in
`to benefit from NOLVADEX therapy.
`study, NOLVADEX was added to melphalan [L-phenylala»
`utero and who have a 1 in 1000 risk of developing clear—cell
`CONTRAINDICATIONS
`nine mustard (1’)] and fluorouracil (F).
`adenocarcinoma of the vagina or cervix. To date, in utera
`NOLVADEX is contraindicated in patients with known by-
`In the Hubay study, patients with a positive (more than 3
`exposure to tamoxifen has not been shown to cause vaginal
`adenosis, or clearAccll adenocarcinoma of the vagina or cer—
`fmol) estrogen receptor were more likely to benefit. In the . persensitivity to the drug.
`Information will be superseded by supplements and subsequent editions
`
`
`
`
`
`I
`I
`
`A
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2045 p. 5
`
`

`

`Hot Flashes
`Weight Gain (>5%)
`Fluid Retention
`Vaginal Discharge
`' Nausea
`Irregiflar Menses
`1 Weight Loss (>5%)
`Skin Changes
`Increased BUN
`Diarrhea
`Increased SGO’I‘
`Increased Alkaline
`Phosphatase
`Vomiting
`Increased Bilirubin
`Increased Creatinine
`Thrombocytopenia”
`l_.eulcopeioiaM
`Thrombotic Events
`0.3
`0.8
`Deep Vein Thrombosis
`0.1
`0.4
`Pulmonary Embolism
`
`Superficial Phlebitis 0.0 0.3
`
`
`68.9
`38.1
`32.4
`29.6
`25.7
`24.6
`22.6
`18.?
`18.1
`11.2
`4.8
`3.0
`
`2.1
`1.8
`1.7
`1.5
`0.4
`
`47.6
`40.1
`29.7
`15.2
`23.9
`18.8
`18.0
`15.3
`20.2
`14.0
`2.8
`4.6
`
`1.?
`1.2
`1.0
`1.2
`1.1
`
`ZE NECA PHARMACE UTlCALS/3427
`PRODUCT INFORMATION
`NSABP 8-14 STUDY
`vix, in young women. However, only a small number of
`young women have been exposed to tamoxifen in micro, and
`92: of Women
`a smaller number have beep followed long enough (to age
`NOLVADEX
`Placebo
`1540) to determine whether vaginal or cervical neoplasia
`Adverse Efl‘cct
`(11:1424)
`{n:1440)
`could occur as a result of this exposure.
`
`There are no adequate and well controlled trials of tamoxv
`ifen in pregnant women. There have been a small number of
`reports ofvaginal bleeding, spontaneous abortions, birth de«
`fects, and fetal deaths in pregnant women. If this drug is
`used during pregnancy, or the patient becomes pregnant
`while taking this drug, or within approximately two months
`afier discontinuing therapy, the patient should be apprise

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket