throbber
“‘
`
`Slgapeal Ni}; Ti}3S6z’l}‘}~3.3.£)2
`(};:pc)si1in:; :1g:3im£EP Palm: {£35 933 6136.53 i25s"3}3§§}
`Patmlea. Astmiieratca M3
`fkymmitian by. Gmicun Richmr Ltd.
`{Int R£f.: M2353 EEPEQW‘
`
`%1f33S3US 3: PM-¥‘i’NEH
`Pfiizztimaviui ~ mfiwkw
`ss&aEsa'§sTa. 4:
`81¢???) MUNCHEN
`
`203
`
`Antiuterotrophic effects of the pure arztioestrogen ICI
`182,780 in adult female mcmkeys (Macaw nemestrimz):
`quantitative magnetic resonance imaging
`
`2313-20
`
`M. Dukes, J. C. Watertcm and A. E. Wakeling
`
`Cancer Research Departxnent, EENECA Pharznaceuticais, Mcresidc, Aldcrley i*a.z-3;, Macclesfield,
`Cheshire sa'..:cm'rc;, UK.
`
`REWSEI1 xawuscmrr RECEIVED 15 Fcbruary I993
`
`A&S’I‘i1ACT
`
`The antiuterotmphic cfiicacy of the pure amioestrcw
`
`(an ICI §S2,’s‘8i} has been demonstrated pr:-wicusly by
`‘zgnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in ouariectomized
`acstrogen»tre:ated monkeys
`(Maczmza nemzsrrina).
`Further charactterizzatinrz cf ihe effects of {CI IBERSE}
`in intact adult female mankeys with nomflai menstrual
`cycles was undertaken to provide an indimticm at‘ its
`p-atantial aciions in prcmcnupausa} wumcn. Changes
`in the volume of uterine tissues war»: measured by
`MRI in early, mid and law cystic. The vahxme of the
`uterus varied up to fivefold between individual
`monkeys but
`serial
`crsbservations
`in
`individuals
`pravided suificieanz precision ta aiiuw aizuurate asses?»
`rrzeems to be made af changes in the endometrium and
`mynmctrium ciuring the amuse cf the menstnzai cynic
`and follszzwixtg ICI 1823851 administration. In c»::m«
`parison with its initial size in untreated monkeys, the
`endwmetrium increased in vcalume by £>£}% and 125%
`in the mid and late czyckz respectively. In cont rain, the
`
`size at‘ the myometrinm decreaseci significantly. by
`15% from cariy In mid cycle and than rawverexi :13
`near its initia! volume in the late cycle. Treatment
`with ICI I82,?80 beginning in the early part of the
`menstruai cycie prevented the growth of the uterus.
`The magnitude and duratim: sf the response was
`dependent on whether €31’ not cevuiaticsn occurred
`during treatmcnt with If?! I$2.’?8f}. In animals rm»
`dared anevulamry, growth of the endametrium was
`blocked compietely by ICI I82,‘?8O and the ‘miume: 01”
`the tissue dcclincd below that prcscm at 111-: star: nf
`the meznstmal cycie. Antiuterrozrophic efiicacy was
`significantiy less in monkeys which mrulated tinting
`treatment with it?! i82;?8{}. The volume: Csf £113.23»-
`matrium was reducexi suhszantialfy by antiuestrugen
`treatment, and the diiference in response between
`ovulatory and ancwuiatary monkeys was less marked
`than that of the eudometrium.
`Iaurnzzf sf Enxiacrinaisgy ($993) 338, 2fl3—2(}‘§
`
`Kxai‘l"i£{}I}UC'l'i(}N
`
`ICI 182380 is a pawn: spccific pure anzioestrogen
`which may prev: superiar ta ca-nvcmianai partial
`agmzist amieestmgens in the ireaamant of breast
`cancer {Wakeiing ex :21. 1993). Previuus
`stuciies
`evaiuateci the antioestrogeni: potency and eificacy of
`ICI 182386 in nvariectomized <:~estmgcn—-treated
`monkeys (Macaw nemesfrimxj by magnetic rescrnance
`imaging (MRI) of the uterus (Waterman er at. 19:91;
`Ifiukes at al‘. 1992). A daily dase of (3-Img ICI
`IS2,?3£3fkg carnpletely bias!-zed
`the utemtrophic
`actitm af emgenous aestradiui-H3. Singk intra«
`muscuiar
`injactians
`at‘ a
`b:mg;«-arzting
`+3iI«-based
`farmuiatien of
`ICI
`i82,‘?8{lI
`in cwariectomézed
`menkeys were 3150 siwwn to inhibit oestrogen acticzn
`in a desmdepcndent sustaincd manner (Dukes at at}.
`
`I992). MRI has been used to ebscrve the uterus
`during the nannal Incmtrual cynic in women (flcmas
`emf. 1986; Haynor er al. 1986; Mcfianhy er al. 1986;
`Wiczyk ex :21. 3988; Barmii er cal. 1991) and the
`response so exogenous endocrine agents {Demas
`22 an‘. 1986; McCarthy as :24‘. 1986; Andrayko am :23.
`1988; Biawin at :25. 199(1). MRI has aiso been usraci
`quantizaiively to measure the changes in volume af
`the endometrium and myometrium during the normal
`manskruai cynic in M. nemastrina (Waterman H as’.
`1992). The MRI studies reparted here were performed
`ts: evaluate {hes antiutcmtraphic affects our? IE?! 132.7788!
`in admit
`femaie monkeys with normal menstrual
`cycles. Such studies are 1-ciwant
`to the pcrtcnzial
`appiicaiicm of ICE }82,‘3’8{} in the treatment of bath
`malignant and benign aestmgen-rasponsive di3££1s¢s
`in pre- and perimmopausal womcn.
`
`Jwrnaf cf Ezsdocrixmfagy (I993) 138., 203~«2{}9 @ £993 Jmzmaf of Emiocrinemgy L16
`IJ£¥22-¥}?§5o“93i{3133~i32U3 $€!2.€)1}!!}
`
`Prrmed £9: Gram firftcfirs
`
`|nnoPharma Exhibit 10570001
`
`

`

`1»
`
`204 M. IJUICE5 and others
`
`Efecrs ef EC? }82,?8{.3 in arm’: menstruating menkegar
`
`MATERIALS AN!) METBGDS
`
`Animal handiieg am} treatment eeieuinlw
`
`Mature female pigtail monkeys (AI. eemeerreze) of
`540 kg body weight with regular menstrual eyeler.
`were used. The ncmnal menstrual cycle in this. species
`is 29-32 days in iength; menstrual bleeding usuaiiy
`lasts 34 days. Daily vegirlaf swabs were taker: to
`detect the «meet of menstrual bleeding and the first
`day cf menetmaiien was rieeigiareri day I ef the
`eycie. Where required, bleed eamples {2 ml) for eaxb-
`sequent hormene analyses were eelleeted daily. MRI
`e:-zaminatiens took place before the animals received
`their mcirning feeti, in order re minimize artefaeteal
`neise associated with get‘. metien. Anaesthesia was
`induced with 8*? mg ketamineikg (VeLlar; Parke
`Daeis, Pentyponi,
`(Sweat, U32.) and waintained
`with haloihane (Fluethane;
`ICI Pharrnaeeuxieals,
`Maoclesfielri, Cheshire, U.l<'..}.
`The timing cal" MRI, drug treatment and bleed
`sampling was scheduled by reference to the firsi clay
`of menstruatien. Te mevide a baseline with which to
`compare the effects at‘ rimg treatment,
`three MRI
`measurements of the uterus were made during each of
`two cycles in ten unzreeteri monkeys (Wetertcm er e3.
`1992}. Images were recorded in early {days 2-—-S}, mid
`(days 12-18} and late (days 21-45} cycle amt sched-
`uled by reference to the diflerenoes in cycle length in
`individuals. Images were reeerdeel at simiiar time»
`paints in menkeys treateel with ECI i82,‘?3€1 beginning
`early in the menstrual cyele (days 2-5). Twe fmmu-
`latiens at‘ If)! 182,‘?8{} were used: 3. sherteacting
`propylene glycol-based solution (F 1) administered
`once daily i.m. for 25 days at a dese ef {H {ee5) or
`{)2 mg {n= 5) {Ci I83,'?8GIkg, and a langecting caster
`eiI~based solution (F2) given as 3 single im. izgeetiee
`el" 235 (R315) er emg (axe) {CI LS2.,?8G}kg.
`
`Quantitative Mill
`
`The methcsd Fer measurement of endemerrium anti
`
`myemezritzm eelume is described in detail elsewhere
`iwalertcrn 2: gr}. 1991, 1992; Dukes er: ml. W92).
`flriefiy,
`the study empleyed a Biespce 40012.3
`instrument {Oxford Research Systems, Cewentry,
`Warwiekshire, U.K.,) te reeerd a series of oblique
`images cf the uterus. For each animal on each
`occasien, sagittal sighting images were used re deter»
`mine the spatial eowardinates of ill: uterine cervix and
`fundns. From these eemrdinates, MR! parameters
`were calculated to allow the aequisizien ef eight
`contiguous ebiique slice images, the thickness, ;>c:ei-
`tier: and orieritatien ml’ which were forced re depend
`on the vector czetmecting the fundus and cervix. This
`procedure allows reprcidueihie presenzatien nf the
`
`Jezerrses’ sf Efldeerinafegy (W93) 133, 3333499
`
`uterus, independent :33‘ its size, location and orienta-
`liun in the pelvis {Dukes er en’. 19%; Waterten er :3}.
`1992}. Image matrices were 256 >-t 2.56 giving an in»
`plane rese-lutirm ef {}~£S:mr11. The appearance all‘ the
`images (see the Plate} results from the choice e-f MR1
`parameters, in particular the magnetic field strength
`of 265 tesla, the eerie time ef Sflme, the repetition
`time ref 3 s, and euppressien {if {he signal fmrn fat.
`To allow comparisons between images acquired an
`difierent eceaeiens,
`tissue eelumes were rneasurexi
`rather than endometrium height er area, since the
`former avoids ariefeets frem repesitienieg errors
`or shape changes. Endometrium and myemetrium
`valumes were obtained by pixel seeming in the
`oblique images rseirig Ilhe irregular reg;ion~ef«imereet
`Facilities within the pregrerns uxrimr or £}ISI‘~lM.R
`(Bruker Analytisehe Messtechnik; Gmhfl, Iiarlsmhe,
`Ciermany). only slices more fundel than the internal
`as were included in the analysis. The junction zone
`was includes: with the myometrium. Any contribution
`in enciurnetrium velume from the lumen was neglected
`since, except during menstruatien, this is very narrew
`and insignificant in eemparisee with {he endeemetrium
`{Drakes er :3}. 1992; Weteriem e: :23’. 19%}.
`Although, in principle, the prescription of regiem
`efiinteresl ear: be subjective, the method empleyed
`minimizes errors, since the presentation cf the uterus
`was the same at each examination (Watenen er ac’.
`I991, I992; Dukes 2: e1. E992). For each animal, the
`same eleserver analysed all imagee. X¥eek~:o-week and
`eyelevteeycle coefficient-5 of variatien were as law as
`5% {Watertxm er :2}. 3992).
`
`Analysis of results
`
`The volumes ef the endemetriem and myemetrium in
`treated and untreated groups were calculated as the
`arithmetic mean {:i‘.: s.e.:.r.} nemalized by reference
`to tissue volumes in individuals at
`the first MRI
`measurement. Differences between group means were
`tested fer significance by the unpaired Student’s
`1-test.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Uterine volume in the enema! menstrual cycle
`
`The wlumes ef the endometrium and myemetrinm
`were measured by MRI in early, mid and late cycle
`in two cycles in each of ten diflerent untreated
`mankeys. {Text-fig. 3}. The mean interval between
`repeat measurements was 4 mcmths
`(range 1-9
`mcmths}. Tissue wlumer. varied widely between indi-
`viduals but less se in repeat measurements in the same
`animal. Typical images reeerdecl in (me menkey at
`
`|nnoPharma Exhibit 1057.0002
`
`

`

`
`
`~ M. DUKES and othersEjj'2’cr.s of:'(‘! £82,730 in adult mmcrruaring monke}-.v 205
`
`
`
`4'0
`
`(a,
`
`\
`
`I
`
`I
`'
`
`1
`
`
`
`_,,_U.T_:
`
`,
`
`N_
`
`A._0-.24?-
`
`~«or:
`
`Nwan
`
`3-5
`
`30
`2-5
`2'0
`
`H9‘.-3c:ue:
`
`I8
`
`[6
`
`I4
`
`I2
`I0
`
`
`
`Volume[cm')
`
`%
`
`’
`
`|
`
`x
`
`I
`
`IN)1_
`
`N_
`
`Isl x5
`
`3_O%
`
`N «.3
`
`N2» $
`
`.. no
`
`NL»m
`
`'
`
`I
`
`I38
`
`226
`
`235
`
`238
`
`233
`I9]
`Animalnumber
`
`228
`
`2|9
`
`169
`
`217
`
`TEXTJPIGURE l. (a) Endometrium and (£2) myometrium volumes in untreated
`monkeys during the menstrual cycle. For each 0!" tan animals the bars represent
`(From left) tissue volumes measured by magnctic resonance imaging in two
`separate: menstrual cycles, during the early (days 2-5}, mid (days 12-48) and
`lalc (days 21-25) stages of the cycle.
`
`Journal of Endocrinology (1993) 133. 203--209
`
`|nnoPharma Exhibit 1057.0003
`
`

`

`206 M. DUK and others
`
`Eflects of IO’ 182.780 in adult menstruating monkeys
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Nonnalizedvolumes(%}
`
`Untreated
`In = 20)
`
`Fl (0-1)
`(n=3)
`
`Fl (02)
`(n = 4)
`
`F2 (2-5)
`in = 3)
`
`F2 (4-0)
`on = 5)
`
`'l"E)(T—FlOURE 2. (a) Endometrium and (b) myornetrium volumes in untreated
`and ICI l82.78D-treated anov-ulatory monkeys. Tissue volumes at mid and late
`cycle were normalized to those recorded at the beginning of the cycle in each
`individual. From the left, values are means i S.l:‘..M. For untreated controls;
`monkeys receiving once daily injections of ICI 182,780 (0-I or 02 mgfkg) (F1)
`for 25 days, beginning on cycle day 3; monkeys receiving a single injection of
`ICI 182,780 (25 or 4 mg/kg) (F2) on day 3.
`
`days 3 (early), 16 (mid) and 24 (late) of the cycle are
`illustrated in the Plate. figs 1-3 and in another case at
`days 2, l6 and 23 in the Plate, figs 7-9. Analysis of the
`data showed that >75% of the variance arises from
`
`Effect of ICI 182,780 on the uterus
`The effects of ICI l82,780 on the appearance of the
`uterus in MR images is shown in the Plate. Plate, figs
`4-6 and 10-12 illustrate the mid corpus of the uterus
`at early. mid and late cycle, in individuals treated
`with the rapid— (F1) or slow- (F2) release Formulations
`of ICI 182.780 respectively, compared with images
`recorded in control cycles in the same individuals
`(Plate,
`figs 1-3 and 7-9). The dramatic shrinkage
`of the endometrium (central high~signal zone)
`is
`immediately apparent;
`the rnyometrial changes are
`less obvious from visual inspection of the images but
`emerge clearly from quantitative image analysis.
`In monkeys treated with ICI 182,780, the magni-
`tude of changes in the volume of the endometrium
`and myometrium was dependent on whether or not
`individual monkeys were rendered anovulatory by the
`treatment. Where serum progesterone concentration
`(not shown) remained below 2 nrnolfl in the second
`half of the menstrual cycle. animals were judged to be
`anovulatory; similarly where progesterone exceeded
`this value and remained elevated for at least ll] days,
`ovulation was assumed to have occurred. By this
`criterion, treatment with 0-] or 0-2 mg ICI l32,780fl<g
`daily (Fl) blocked ovulation in three or four of the
`
`|nnoPharma Exhibit 1057.0004
`
`interanimal variability. Average coefficients of varia-
`tion for volumes measured in dilferent cycies were in
`the range l4—l9% for the endomctrium and 6-10"/E:
`for the myometrium.
`The
`endometrium increased
`
`in
`
`the
`
`in
`
`size
`
`follicular phase of the menstrual cycle in 17 of 20
`cycles (mean increase 60%, P-<0-O01; early vs mid
`cycle volume) and this growth continued in the
`luteal phase in 18 of 20 cycles (mean increase 65%,
`P<0-001; mid vs late cycle volume). Changes in the
`volume of the myometrium were smaller but a
`consistent pattern emerged in which a decrease in
`size was observed in 18 of 20 cycles in the follicular
`phase (mean decrease 16%, P<0~0Ol; early vs mid
`cycle).
`In the luteal phase the volume of the
`myometrium increased in 18 of 20 cycles (mean
`10%. P<0-02; mid vs late cycle volume). The net
`effect of the follicular phase shrinkage and luteal
`phase growth of the myometrium restored mean
`myometrium volume to near that recorded initially
`(94%, P>0-OS compared with early cycle).
`
`Journal of Endocrinology (1993) 138. 203-209
`
`

`

`Ejfecrs of [C1 £82,780 in adult menstruating monkeys
`
`M. DUKES and others
`
`20?
`
`
`
`200
`
`A100
`
`E3
`
`3‘
`
`E2 E
`
`‘U
`
`0
`
`100
`
`so
`
`0
`
`E
`"4
`E0
`
`2 F
`
`Untreated
`
`F2(4-0)
`r=2(2-5)
`1=2(2-5;
`12-295)
`1:: (0-23
`F1(0-1)
`Fl to-1)
`I69
`233
`219
`217
`174
`225
`235
`(tr) Endometrium and (b) myometrium volumes in untreated and lCl I82,780-treated ovulatory monkeys.
`TEXT-FIGURE 3.
`Tissue volumes at mid and late cycle. normalized to those recorded at the beginning of the cycle in each individual
`monkey, are compared with mean values (it s.ts.M., n-‘-20) for untreated controls. From the left. values are
`means i s.E.M. for untreated controls; monkeys receiving once daily injections of ICI 182,780 {I}! or 0-2 mglkg) {F1} for
`25 days beginning on cycle day 3; monkeys receiving a single injection of ICI 182,780 (26 or 4 mg/kg) (F2) on day 3,
`
`five monkeys respectively, in each dose group. Simi-
`larly. ovulation was blocked in three or five of the six
`monkeys receiving a single injection of 2-5 or 4mg
`ICI 182.780lkg (F2). There was a tendency for the
`her-dose groups to include fewer ovulatory cycles
`‘fit this was not statistically significant with the small
`group sizes employed.
`The mean changes in the volume of the endo-
`metrium and myometrium in ICI 132,780-treated
`animals are presented in Text-figs 2 and 3. Since
`absolute tissue volumes vary widely between indi-
`viduals
`(Te:-ct-fig.
`1),
`the effects of 1C] 182,780
`were assessed by normalizing the volume of tissue(s)
`recorded in each animal at
`the mid and late cycle
`observations to those recorded at the beginning of the
`cycle, prior to treatment, and by comparison with
`similarly normalized observations in the untreated
`controls. In monkeys rendered anovulatory by ICI
`l82.'I'8D (Text-fig. 2), the normal follicular and luteal
`phase growth of the endomctriurn was blocked
`completely and tissue volume at mid and late cycle
`was significantly (P-<0-001)
`less
`than that before
`treatment began in each of the treatment regimens.
`
`Although shrinkage of the endometrium was most
`apparent during the first half of the cycle {mean
`decrease — 61% compared with +60% control,
`P<0-001, at mid cycle). blockade of growth was
`sustained throughout (mean - 67% compared with
`+l25% control. P<0'00l, at
`late cycle). When the
`occurrence of ovulation was accounted for. no sig-
`nificant diflerences emerged between the effects of the
`different forrnulations and doses of ICI 182,780. with
`the exception that
`the 2-5 mg dose (F2) appeared
`slightly less effective (P<O-05) than the 4-0 mg dose in
`the second half of the cycle. The volume of the
`myometrium in [CI 182,780-treated anovulatory
`monkeys (‘Text-fig. 2) decreased more rapidly than in
`controls in each treatment group from early to mid
`cycle {mean - 35% compared with - 16% control.
`P<0vOOl. at mid cycle) and this decline continued in
`the second half of the cycle (mean - 54% compared
`with — 6% control, P-<0-001, at late cycle).
`In monkeys in which treatment did not block
`ovulation (Text-fig. 3), the mean effect of ICI 182330
`on the endometrium in the first half of the cycle
`( — 27% compared with +60% control. P<0-0|] was
`
`Journal ofEm1'a<“r.inol'ogy (1993) 138, 203-209
`
`|nnoPharma Exhibit 1057.0005
`
`

`


`
`298
`
`M. uuxrzs and anthers
`
`Effects of’ EC! £82,780 in adult menttreaatirrg rrraniceyr
`
`seen in the anawlatcsry mczmltcys
`less than that
`but not significantly {PNII-03} ac. Hawevar,
`the
`mean respmtsc czmcealecl Widb clilfcrenccs between
`iriflividual monkeys with five {Isl the seven animals
`slmwing shrinkage (mean ~« 3S;l:5‘3r‘£:} whilst
`the
`remaining two mtmkeys experienced net gruwth at"
`the errdsametriunt (+l{)3% and +23%). In the latter
`animals, the gmwth {hf endometrium resumezl in the
`lute:-zl phase of the cycle l§+‘}"0%) at a rate similar in:
`that
`in untreated monkeys {+55%}. Mean tirsac
`Vfliflmfi remained, htrwever, lea-:3 than that in untreated
`cnntrols at the and at‘ the cm}: (P<l}~0l), but grtater
`than that
`in anovulatery monkeys (P<‘(}-D01). A
`similar pattern at" change was observed in the
`myametrium (’I“ext«fig. 3). At mid cycle the mean
`valumc af‘
`the tissue was
`reduced significantly
`{M 3'}'%: P<{}-{ll cnmparccl with central) and this
`effect was mt different
`tram that
`in atmvulawry
`animals (W 35‘i»’a}+ However, as was the case for the
`cnciomelrium,
`the myometrium did recover in the
`luteal phase (+18%) but ms: to the volume seen in
`controls. All
`the late cycle ubservaticm,
`ttfects of
`lreatnleat an that: myrzmstrium were significantly lest;
`{.P<f{l'{3t} in avulatary than in aria-xrulawry monkeyt.
`
`DISCUSSIGN
`
`MRI pravidas an accurate anal rapraclucible means emf
`measuring the changes in rcslume: of the uterus in
`response to aestrcsgerr treatment
`in uvariactemizcd
`rrmnkeys {Watertcm £2 at 199l) and has been used to
`evaluate the antiuterotraphic acticm eel“ lift l3?:..7"3{)
`(Dukes e: mi 1992). This techniqm: has been applied
`previously In rtctermine the changers in volurne of
`the enclometrium and myometrium during the can rs:
`of the narmal rttertstruat cycle at‘ M. nemwrrfna
`(‘Waterton er at‘. 1992) and in this repair: to measure
`the affmzts of treatment with ICE l82,?8{l can these
`changes.
`At the time of menstruation, uterine size, in partic-
`ular that of the enclometrtum, would be expected to
`reach a minimum and to increase during the fallicular
`phase {if the cycle and, in a lesser extent, in the lutcai
`phase. To address this question, MRI measurements
`were made at early, mitt anti lair: cycle in each of two
`normal cyclas in ten manlcrzys. In the early part :22” the
`cycle (days 2-53, the vulum: cf the endumrztriuzm and
`myomctrium in individuals varied over a tviczle range
`{up ti) fivrzfurlci), but tissue volumes were much lass
`variable in repetitive measurements in the same
`individual ("I‘ext—fig. I), A clear pattern at‘ change
`emerged during the menstrual cycle in which signifl—
`cant grawth of the endometrium was seen in both the
`fallicular and lttlfial phases. Perhaps surprisingly, the
`mean increase in size of the tznclnmetrfium was similar
`
`fauna? qf ilrreirrcrirrtxlugy {I953} 138. 263-209
`
`comparing the first and second half of the cycle.
`Clastradinl is ctmsiclered ta be thr: majrir mitagan for
`the uterus and it was thus anticipated that that largest
`change in the: endvzamstrium would occur in the falli-
`crtlar phase at‘ the cycle. ‘Hr-zawever, a propcrtionately
`similar increase in the valume at" the endametrium
`
`was seen in the luteal phase ef the cycle, MRI cannot
`be used is deterrnine whether the effects cl‘ {Estrogen
`and progettcrone on the size of the enrirtmetrium
`can be attrihuted mainly In epithelial hyperplasia as
`opposed to lrypertmphy. Changes in the size of the
`myumctrium during thc menstrual cycle were quanti—
`tatively much smaller than them: of the endrxmetrium
`and‘ in the follicular phase, qualitatively different
`{Text-fig. 1}. Remarkably, the myometrium (increased
`in size when the enclotnetriurzt was gnawing, mean
`myomclrium volume being smaller in mid cycle than
`at rncnstruaticn. This may indicate that the threslwid
`of sensitivity of the myamctrium to oestrngtzns is
`higher than that of the endamctrium andior that the
`rate at which the myometrium responds to changes
`in lmrtrtttrtal status is less: than that far the critic»
`meztriurn. Hawcvcr
`S.)‘{il¢§ mechanisms,
`such as
`ht:~r:none:«imtuced changes;
`in muscle trzane, may
`influence: the apparent Sim (if the uterus and are net
`accrcruntesd for in these MRI images.
`Initial studies at‘ the effettts cf ICI 182380 em-
`played a daily daring regimen with the antioestrogen
`fnrtnuiated in propylene glycnl whistle (F1) to provide
`rapid release in viva. it was Shawn previously that the
`chaztcrs dcesrzs cif till I32,'?3{l {G-l——l}~2 mglkg per day}
`achieve complete and rapidly reversible bleckade: of
`exogerwus oestrogen stimulation at‘ the uterus in the
`cmariecttxmized mcmkeys {Dukes as at 1992). Daily
`treatment during the menstrual cycle prtrsvided clear
`evidence that
`ICI £32,780 also has a substantial
`antiaestmgenit: effect an the uterus in intact monkeys
`{Text-figs 2 and 3}. The magnitude of the anti«
`uterotrophir: effect was strazmgly influenced by the
`cencurrent endocrine effects of
`It'll
`l82,';'30,
`in
`particular by whether the mszutkeys ovulated during
`the treatment pfififld. In anomlatory monkeys, not
`only was the rrrmnal
`increase in volume at‘ the
`endamclrium in the faflicular phasrz absent, the ends»
`mctréum actually clocrcasad in size to: volume mm»
`parable to thasc siren in tlvariecmmized munkezys after
`oestrogen withdrawal (Watarton at ac’. 199i; Iliukes
`at all. 1992}, indicating that treatment achieved cam-
`pletc lzalczckade of this trophic: actien of cndcgenmts
`mstrugens. This blockade of nrsstregrzrt arztian ml the:
`endcemetrium was sustained in the second half of
`
`the cycle. An aestmger: wrtlxdrawal-—like actian an the
`myarnctriun: was also recorded, where the normal
`small tie.-crease in volume rat" the mynmetrium in the
`follicular phase was significantly amplified by ICE
`l82.,’?8{l, and also became: similar in magnitude ta that
`
`|nnoPharma Exhibit 1057.0006
`
`

`

`£}fi'ee£e ef EC! 182, E88} 5:: admit meesmmrizxg meekeys
`
`2.1. ounces and others
`
`209
`
`seen feiiewing oestrogen withdrawai in evarieetm
`mixer} mankeys. This shrinkage es? the myametrium
`ceetirmeti in the lutmi phase,
`The alternative eiifibased tang-azzting formuiatien
`(P2) of {CI 182,780, shown previeusiy to susiain
`blockade 01' lbs: uterotmphic: action if ecstradisi in
`cnaarieetemizeci monkeys fer appreximateiy 1 month
`(Dukes at am‘. 3992), produced cfiecw an the uterus
`simfiar to these ef the short-acting Fonmziation.
`These previous phannacelegicai findings are cniireiy
`eensistent with the findings in the present study with
`respect ten the duration «pf autism, the apparent dese-
`respense, and the longer sustained blockade ei‘
`myemetrial than enctamezrial gmwzh. In monkeys
`rendered anevulatery, the entimerotrephie efiieei of
`the 4%) mgfkg dase was indistinguishable {ram that
`of the shat:-acting feneulalione Hewever, the Iewex
`2-S mgfkg dust did not fully bimrk the trophic acxiun
`(_\f_endegexmus oestregens on the emiuxneitium in the
`mend ha?!‘ of the cycie, but éid cause progressive
`myametrial shrinkage. This prevides further evidence
`that the threshold at‘ sensitivity cf the myemetrium to
`uestmgens is higher khan that of the endametrium.
`With both fcrnnulations, the antiutemtrophic e£¥i~
`ceey of BL‘! 182,?88 in monkeys that mmiaked during
`treatment was more variable and generally smailer
`than in anovulamry animals, but slit! suhstamial in
`the majority {five of aeeen} of individuals {Text-figs 2
`and 31
`Gverell, ef the total of 22 treated ‘eyeies’, 15 were
`anevuiatary. With both formuiaticms there was same
`evidence that
`inhibixion of emmien was dese~
`
`related, but there were insufficicnt data to eetablish
`statistically significant ctifierenees. The reasons for the
`variability between individuals in their susceptibility
`to bteckede ef ovulation are net understood.
`
`These studies were mmpleted using nan-invasive
`1: methods with fewer than 2%) animals. In practice
`sfieh infarmaticm is unebtainahie in terminal experi»
`meme. Far example, it is estimated that detection cf‘
`myometrial shrinkage at the same time as cndemetrial
`gmwth by ten-nine! methods at the same sig1ificam:e
`icvel weuid have required ewe: 3“S{? animals. Thus,
`MRI may be a particularly sensitive and peewerful
`tea} for efinica} studies in endocrine phannaecaiegy.
`The elinieai usefulness of ICI 182380 remains in be
`determined, but its effeet in a case es?‘ spontaneceus
`aéenomyosis
`in a mcmkey has been described
`(Waterten er a1. 1993}.
`
`ACKN(}WLEI}(II£MENTS
`
`iitzarrocrks, I). Miiler,
`We thank 8.1- A. Breen, M.
`J. S. W. Morreii, 3. B. Larcumbe-Mebauail, D. Priest
`and 3. Tattershaii fer expert technical assistance.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`Azxdreykue J. 3,... Biumaefelé, 21., Mat.-sisal], L, 3%.. Mamet‘ S. E.,
`Hricak. H. &. Ia-flea, R. B. (1933). Use ef an aganisxie anaieg
`ef gonad~::rtronpin~reIeaeing hertmzvm {rzafarelizfl ta treat
`ieiomyemasz eeeessment by magmttie resrmancc imaging.
`American fezzreef cf Qbszerriex and Gyeeeefegy 1.58, 9&3»-910.
`Bartuli, 1 M. Meuiin. Ga, I3eLanne:.a L., Chagnaud, C. 8:
`Kaebarian, H. £1991}. The nouns! merus an magnetixt
`ntsaenansze imaging and variations associated with the
`hurmunal 33312:. Szsrgieef-Radfefogie Astazwmy !3, 213420.
`flames, B. E‘, Hrieein, H. & Jaflc. R. B. (19825; Utefine
`imaging: eflbcte :31‘ haemona! siimuiation. Redieiegy 159,
`323-125.
`Dukes, M., Mitten 3)., Wakeling, A. E. & Waterion, J. (3.
`(I992). Améulemiraphic efieats Inf 2! pure amiacstmgen, ICE
`i81,?S{}: magnetic resonance imaging of the uterus in
`evariectomizeccd monkeys. Jaermzf ef Endecrinefegy 135.
`33?-34?.
`Haynes, 3}. Fr‘... Meek, L. A, S-aulee, M. IL, Simmer; W. F5.
`Mezstana, M. A. at Mass, in 9:. {I936}. Changiag appearance
`ef the nermafl elem: timing the menstrual cycle. Radiefegy
`16!, 459-462.
`McCarthy, 8., Tauber. C. & Gare. I. (1986), Female pelvic
`anatomy: MR assessment of variatione during the meosmza-.1
`cycle and with use at“ cm} eemraeepzives. Reeiaiegy I63}.
`3 19-123.
`
`Wakding‘ A“ E. Bakes. M. &. fiewien 1, {}9}9i}u A. potent
`specific mm: anti-Brlrstragen with eiiriistal patentiee Center
`Research 51, 3367-38?3.
`Wataflon. J. (2., fircen. 8* Aw mk:-.3, 1%.. Horrecics. M. 8:
`Wadswonh, P. {Z993}. A case of asienemyesis diagnesed by
`magnetic reeenanee imaging and treated with the name! pure
`anticecstre-gen ICI 38333:). Leiwrasezy Aefmszi Science {In
`Pme}
`Waierton, 3. £1. La:ce:nbe»?vic£>ouel1. 3. E. 8: Mifics. $3. {$992}.
`Quantitative MRI of the prostate and uterus in memkeys.
`Megrxezie Reseneme in Medfeiee 28. 34491.
`Watering, J. 172., Miilez, 1)., Dukes, M. S: Mam-:11, J. S. W,
`{ESE1}. Qbiique MMR imaging ef the meme in macaques:
`uterine response: It‘: estrogen etimufimiun. Magaesie Reeeneeee
`:31 Medicine 20, 223~239.
`Wieeyk. FE. Pt. hens, C. 1... Richards, Cm L, Chef. M. 3.,
`(369631, E. 3.. Rabiuewit: J. G. & Laufer, N. {£983}
`Comparison ui‘ magnetic resunsxnee imaging and uitrascnnd in
`evaluating feltieelax and eetiemetrial development ihxeughetst
`the wane? cycle. Fertffiry wee‘ Sierflizy 4:9. 969-—9?S.
`Kama. M., McCarthy, 8., Scam. L., Lange, R, Levy; (3., Velte.
`3. 8: Camila. F. (39%). Munimring therapy with a
`genadotropin-reieaszng humane anelag: utiliiy ef MR
`imaging. Raeieiegy ['35, 5£l3~S(36.
`
`Jeunraf if Erscfeerinofeg}-' {1993} 338,, 2€13««209
`
`|nnoPharma Exhibit 1057.000?
`
`

`

`an
`
`2103
`
`M. 12:61:13.5 and mhers
`
`Efects cf1CI 182.?8{? Er: min}: menssmarshg mankeys:
`n
`
`I3ESCRI!”I‘!ON ()1? PLATE
`
`Magnetic: remnant: (MR) images of the monkey utarus.
`Each illustration is a email, represanting 3-4 x 3-4 cm,
`fmm am: slice cf 11:: eight utcorded at each mcasurcment.
`The appearasxca at mid-mtgus utcri is Shawn as fofilows.
`Tap raw: images abtaimzd 3: day 3 (Fig? 1), day 16 (Fig.
`2} and sziay 24 (Fig. 3} of an untreated menstrual cycle.
`Second raw: imagszs ubtained at day 3 (Fig. 4}, day 15
`(Fig. 5} and day 24 (Fig. 6) in the same animai during a
`cynic in which {H mg K31 lS2,?$43fkg was injevcted fiaiiy
`from day 3. Third row: imagea obtained at day 2 (Fig. 3'),
`day E6 (Fig. 3) and day 23 (Fig. 9} at‘ an umreatcd
`mensirual cycie. Batmm row: images obtained at day 2
`
`(Fig. 10}, day 16 (Fig. 11) and clay 23 (Fig 12} in the
`same: animal timing 3 crycie in which 4 mg 1C1 I82,?8{Ifkg
`sustained-rckease famiuiaiian was injectad an day 2. The
`cycies shown in that tap three rnaws were ovmlatarjs‘. Fm:
`at five canccntris: macs sf MR signal intensity are men:
`annual sigzai void, znenstruai haemm-rhage (91:13: during
`menstruation); high signal, endamctrium; medium»-Iszrw
`sigma}, myommial junctinn mac; medium-high sigma},
`myomctriurn; and nor sigxal. peripheral adipose tisaua.
`The area (aften crascenhshapeti} at’ high sigma} intensity
`secs: at the 12!: in Figs ‘RN12 is mine in thc bladder. At:
`nvary is partialiy visible {hottum right) in Figs ‘E-ii.
`
`fact:-mi! {Ff Endacrinafagy {I993} 13$, 203-2139
`
`|nnoPharma Exhibit 1057.0008
`
`

`

`M «II
`
`lf_f)'m-M‘ :1] If"! I-\'..‘. -W“ in ur/m": m.~rr\.rrmu.m_g- :mwI'wL-\
`
`=
`
`\| U1 El N and others
`
`.|...~n:_- ;« 1;;-.
`
`J..mn.:.r' n.’ Lxr.-.«‘u. :'r.-m.r'.-.1-1 gitmll I394, _‘II‘«
`
`jlki
`
`12
`
`|nnoPharma Exhibit 1057.0009
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket