throbber
British Journal of Cancer (1996) 74, 300-308
`© 1996 Stockton Press All rights reserved 0007-0920/96 $12.00
`
`Pharmacokinetics, pharmacological and anti-tumour effects of the specific
`anti-oestrogen ICI 182780 in women with advanced breast cancer
`
`A Howell‘, DJ DeFriend2, JFR Robertson3, RW Blamey3, L Anderson‘, E Anderson‘, FA
`Sutcliffes and P Walton5
`
`’CRC Department of Medical Oncology, University of Manchester, Christie Hospital, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX;
`2Department of Surgery, University Hospital of South Manchester, Nell Lane, West Didsbury, Manchester M20 8LR; ‘Department
`of Surgery, City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 IPB; ‘Tumour Biochemistry Laboratory, Christie Hospital, Wilmslow Road,
`Manchester M20 4BX; 5Zeneca Pharmaceuticals, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire SKIO 4 TG, UK.
`
`Summary We have assessed the pharmacokinetics, pharmacological and anti-tumour effects of the specific
`steroidal anti-oestrogen ICI 182780 in 19 patients with advanced breast cancer resistant to tamoxifen. The
`agent was administered as a monthly depot intramuscular injection. Peak levels of ICI 182780 occurred a
`median of 8—9 days after dosing and then declined but were above the projected therapeutic threshold at day
`28. Cm,“ during the first month was 10.5 ng/ml" and during the sixth month was 12.6 ng ml“. The AUCs
`were 140.5 and 206.8 ng day ml" on the first and sixth month of dosing respectively, suggesting some drug
`accumulation. Luteinising hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels rose after withdrawal
`of tamoxifen and then plateaued, suggesting no effect of ICI 182780 on the pitu.itary—hypothalamic axis. There
`were no significant changes in serum levels of prolactin, sex horrnone-binding globulin (SHBG) or lipids. Side-
`efl"ects were infrequent. Hot-flushes and sweats were not induced and there was no apparent effect of treatment
`upon the endometrium or vagina. Thirteen (69%) patients responded (seven had partial responses and six
`showed ‘no change’ responses) to ICI 182780, after progression on tamoxifen, for a median duration of 25
`months. Thus ICI 182780, given by monthly depot injection, and at the drug levels described,
`is an active
`second-line anti-oestrogen without apparent negative effects on the liver, brain or genital tract and warrants
`further evaluation in patients with advanced breast cancer.
`
`Keywords: ICI 182780; advanced breast cancer
`
`Half of the patients with advanced breast cancer have
`tumours that either regress or remain stable when treated
`with tamoxifen. Despite initial response all such tumours
`eventually become resistant
`to this anti-oestrogen after a
`median duration of remission of about 18 months (Cole et
`al., 1971; Patterson et al., 1981). Although it acts as an
`oestrogen antagonist with respect to the tumour, tamoxifen is
`oestrogenic with respect to bone (Turken et al., 1989), the
`liver (Bertelli et al., 1988) and the endometrium (Fornander
`et al., 1989). Potential causes of treatment failure may result
`from tamoxifen, or its metabolites (Osborne et al., 1991)
`becoming oestrogenic with respect to the tumour (Howell et
`al., 1990) or from tamoxifen becoming sequestered away
`from the oestrogen receptor
`(ER) and rendered inactive
`(Pavlick et al., 1992).
`A new class of specific anti-oestrogens has been developed
`that produce more complete suppression of the proliferative
`effects of oestrogen upon tumours. Substitution of a long
`side-chain at the 7 alpha position of the oestradiol molecule
`has produced compounds that appear more active as anti-
`oestrogens than the triphenylethylene derivatives such as
`tamoxifen (Wakeling and Bowler, 1987, 1988). The structure
`of the prototype specific anti-oestrogen, ICI 164384, is shown
`in Figure
`1
`together with that of
`ICI
`182780,
`{7a-
`[9(4,4,5,5,pentafluoropentyl-su1phinyl)nonyl]oestra-l ,3,5,( 10)-
`triene-3,17fi-diol} the compound selected for clinical evalua-
`tion because of its greater potency and affinity for the ER
`(Wakeling et al., 1991).
`Both compounds have been assessed using in vitro and
`animal models of human breast cancer and compared with
`non-steroidal,
`partial
`agonist
`anti-oestrogens,
`including
`tamoxifen, and also with oestrogen withdrawal. The specific
`anti—oestrogens have shown superiority over these alternative
`
`Correspondence: A Howell
`Received 3 April 1995;
`revised 14 February 1996; accepted 15
`February 1996
`
`methods of oestrogen deprivation with respect to inhibition of
`cell proliferation and oestrogen-induced gene expression. ICI
`164384 and ICI 182780 are up to two orders of magnitude
`more potent than tamoxifen as inhibitors of cell growth in
`vitro. (Wakeling and Bowler, 1987, 1988) and produce a more
`profound blockade of cell division in the G1 phase of the cell
`cycle. The specific anti—oestrogens are more effective than
`tamoxifen in suppressing expression of oestrogen-induced
`genes,
`such as progesterone receptor
`(PgR), pS2 and
`cathepsin D (Nicholson et al., 1994) by breast cancer cells.
`The specific anti—oestrogens have also been shown to produce
`a rapid reduction of intracellular ER levels, possibly as a result
`of inhibition of ER dimerisation and reduction of the ER half-
`life (Fawell et al., 1990; Dauvois et al., 1992). This latter effect
`is in contrast to that of tamoxifen, which has been shown to
`increase ER expression by breast cancer cells
`in vitro
`(Wakeling et al., 1989).
`The experiments outlined above were performed on cell
`lines but similar results were demonstrated when a short-
`acting, propylene glycol-based formulation of ICI 182780 was
`administered by daily intramuscular injection for
`1 week
`before surgery to women with primary breast cancer.
`Compared with pretreatment tumour samples (obtained by
`Tru-cut biopsy),
`those obtained after treatment with the
`specific anti-oestrogen showed reduced proliferation (K167
`expression) and reduced or absent expression of ER, PgR
`and pS2 (DeFriend et al., 1994b; Nicholson et al., 1994).
`Similar clinical experiments with tamoxifen produced no
`change in ER expression, slightly increased PgR expression
`and a reduction in labelling index (Howell et al., 1988;
`Roberston et al., 1991; Clarke et al., 1993; Nicholson et al.,
`1994).
`The aims of the study reported here were to assess the
`long-terrn efficacy and toxicity of the specific anti-oestrogen
`ICI 182780 in patients with advanced breast cancer and to
`evaluate the pharrnacokinetics of the long-acting formulation
`used. Since tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cell lines have
`been shown to retain sensitivity to specific anti—oestrogens
`
`|nnoPharma Exhibit 1007.0001
`
`

`

`a
`
`on
`
`Study design
`
`|C|18278O and advanced breast cancer
`A Howell et al
`
`301
`
`"'0
`
`b
`
`H0
`
`”’/o
`/(CH2)1oCOlTl(CH2)3CH3
`cu-:3
`
`ICI 164384
`
`OH
`
`”’/x,
`(CH2)9S0(CH2)3CF2CF3
`ICI 182780
`
`Figure 1 Comparison of the structures of ICI 164384 and ICI
`182780.
`
`when grown either in vitro (Lykkesfeld and Sorenson, 1992;
`Brunner et al.,
`l993a,b; Lykkesfeld et al.,
`1994) or as
`xenografts in nude mice in vivo (Gottardis et al., 1989;
`Osborne et al.,
`1991),
`the effects of ICI 182780 were
`evaluated in a group of post-menopausal patients with
`tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer. Since the partial agonist
`activity of tamoxifen on bone density and lipid levels has
`been reported to the beneficial in post-menopausal patients,
`the effects of ICI 182780 at other oestrogen target sites,
`including the hypothalamus/pituitary gland, the liver and the
`endometrium has also been assessed in this study.
`We report that although some drug accumulation occurred
`at the dose level used in this study, administration of ICI
`182780 was associated with a lower than expected incidence
`of side-effects (such as hot flushes and vaginal problems)
`together with a high response rate and long response
`duration in women previously treated with tamoxifen. A
`preliminary report of the early clinical result of this study has
`been published (Howell et al., 1995).
`
`Patients and methods
`
`Patients
`
`Nineteen patients with advanced breast cancer resistant to
`tamoxifen were treated with ICI 182780. The study was
`approved by the ethics committees of each clinical centre.
`Patients were eligible for
`the study if they were post-
`menopausal and age less than 81 years, with histologically
`verified breast cancer. Patients were included if they had been
`treated with tamoxifen as an adjuvant to surgery for more
`than 2 years and then relapsed, or if they had been treated
`with tamoxifen for advanced disease, had a complete or
`partial remission or disease stabilisation (‘no change’) for at
`least 6 months, and subsequently progressed while taking
`tamoxifen. Patients were excluded if
`they had serious
`intercurrent disease, a WHO performance status of greater
`than 2, and a life expectancy of less than 3 months or had
`received previous cytotoxic chemotherapy for advanced
`breast cancer. The characteristics of the patients studied are
`summarised in Table 1. One patient had adjuvant therapy for
`only 9 months and progressed and was thus a protocol
`violation, but is included in the analysis. She had progressive
`disease when treated with ICI 182780.
`
`After giving informed consent, all patients participating in
`the study underwent baseline staging investigations before
`commencing treatment with ICI 182780 including X-rays,
`liver ultrasound or computerised tomography (CT) scan and
`isotope bone scan. ICI 182780 was administered as a long-
`acting formulation contained in a castor oil-based vehicle by
`monthly i.m. injection (5 ml) into the buttock. For appraisal
`of drug safety, the first four patients received escalating doses
`of ICI 182780, starting with 100 mg in the first month and
`increasing to 250 mg i.m. from the second month onwards,
`following confirmation of lack of local or systemic drug
`toxicity
`at
`the
`100 mg dose. Patients 5-19 received
`250 mg month“ i.m. from the outset. Treatment with ICI
`182780 was continued until objective tumour progression
`occurred. Patients were seen at intervals of 3-7 days during
`the first month after commencing treatment with ICI 182780
`in order to monitor local and systemic drug tolerability and
`to collect blood samples
`for pharmacokinetic
`studies.
`Thereafter, patients were reviewed at monthly intervals in
`order to evaluate objective tumour response to ICI 182780
`and to further monitor local and systemic drug tolerability.
`Blood samples were taken before commencing treatment with
`ICI
`182780
`and at monthly
`intervals
`thereafter
`for
`measurement of full blood count, clinical biochemistry and
`serum hormone, SHBG and lipid levels. Tumour response to
`therapy was evaluated according to UICC criteria (Hayward
`et a1., 1977). To qualify for the ‘no change’ category, tumour
`growth had to stabilise for more than 6 months (Howell et
`al., 1988; Robertson et al., 1989). Body weight was recorded
`at each monthly review in the majority of patients.
`
`Serum estimations
`
`The concentration of ICI 182780 in serum samples was
`determined by radioimmunoassay (RIA), using antibodies
`raised in sheep to ICI 182780 coupled at the 17-position to
`thyroglobulin and tritiated ICI 182780. The procedure was
`applied after solid base clean up of a diethyl ether/hexane
`extract of serum. The study limit of quantification was
`0.68 ng ml“. The RIA procedure is believed to be specific
`for ICI 182780, since comparative analysis of plasma samples
`from preclinical studies by RIA and high-performance liquid
`chromatography (HPLC) showed a good correlation for ICI
`182780 concentrations. Further,
`ICI
`182780 metabolites
`present
`in these samples were not detected by the RIA.
`Gonadotrophins follicle-stimulating hormone and lutenising
`hormone (FSH and LH) and SHBG were measured by RIA
`in the Regional Radioimmunoassay Laboratory of
`the
`University Hospital of South Manchester. Prolactin was
`measured by immunoradiometric
`assay
`using
`reagents
`supplied by Netria. Total cholesterol levels were determined
`enzymatically
`using
`a
`commercially
`available
`reagent
`(Diamed, Switzerland). Triglyceride levels were determined
`by the glyceryl phosphate oxidase—peroxidase—antiperox-
`idase method using a commercially available kit (Boehringer
`Mannheim, Germany). High-density lipoprotein (HDL)
`cholesterol
`levels were measured after pretreatment of the
`serum samples with buffered magnesium phosphotungstate,
`which selectively precipitates low-density lipoprotein (LDL)
`cholesterol, very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol
`and chylomicrons,
`leaving HDL cholesterol
`in the super-
`natant. Serum levels of LDL cholesterol were calculated
`using the Friedewald equation (Friedewald et al., 1972).
`
`Endometrial assessment
`
`Endometrial thickness was measured in transverse section by
`transabdominal ultrasound using a Siemens Sonoline SL2 with
`a 3.5 MHz sector probe. Baseline and repeat scans at 3 -6
`monthly intervals were performed in five patients. Endometrial
`histology was reviewed on one patient who had a hysterectomy
`for uterine prolapse after 18 months on ICI 182780.
`
`|nnoPharma Exhibit 10070002
`
`

`

`302
`
`IcI182780 and advanced breast cancer
`A Howell et al
`
`No.
`1 (ERD)
`
`2 (PF)
`
`3 (SAS)
`
`4 (AS)
`
`5 (AR)
`
`6 (FC)
`
`7 (SC)
`
`8 (LH)
`
`9 (NT)
`
`Age at
`entry
`51
`
`75
`
`49
`
`53
`
`68
`
`58
`
`61
`
`55
`
`70
`
`Table I Patient characteristics, tumour receptor status and response to ICI182780
`Duration
`Duration
`of adjuvant
`of tamoxifen Response to
`tamoxifen
`for adv
`tamoxifen
`48
`—
`
`ER”
`0
`
`PR"
`0
`
`Time to
`relapse
`48
`
`Sites of
`disease
`Bone
`
`—
`
`74
`
`45
`
`20
`
`77
`
`—
`
`48
`
`42
`
`-
`
`68
`
`45
`
`20
`
`77
`
`—
`
`—
`
`9
`
`8
`
`—
`
`—
`
`—
`
`—
`
`8
`
`19
`
`—
`
`NC
`
`PR
`
`PR
`
`NC
`
`Breast
`Nodes
`
`Lung
`Pleura
`
`Bone
`
`Bone
`Pleura
`
`Nodes
`
`Bone
`Breast
`
`Breast
`Node
`
`Local
`Bone
`
`Local
`
`99
`
`0
`
`16
`
`74
`
`73
`
`ND
`
`70
`
`95
`
`100
`
`99
`
`22
`
`0
`
`< 5
`
`6
`
`ND
`
`95
`
`80
`
`100
`
`Response to Duration
`182780
`(months)
`PD
`<2
`
`NC
`
`PR
`
`PD
`
`PR
`
`PR
`
`PD
`
`PR
`
`PD
`
`PR
`
`29
`
`12
`
`<2
`
`8
`
`3
`
`<2
`
`25
`
`<2
`
`33 +
`
`10 (MC)
`
`11 (FWT)
`
`12 (MEU)
`
`13 (KG)
`
`14 (IN)
`
`15 (CA)
`
`16 (AC)
`
`17 (LM)
`
`18 (JKJ)
`19 (MB)
`
`64
`
`70
`
`51
`
`62
`
`78
`
`48
`
`64
`
`67
`
`65
`64
`
`201
`
`271
`
`77
`
`~
`
`120
`
`61
`
`68
`
`52
`
`80
`23
`
`-
`
`—
`
`74
`
`—
`
`—
`
`61
`
`67
`
`—
`
`—
`23
`
`8
`
`7
`
`-
`
`12
`
`24
`
`—
`
`—
`
`34
`
`48
`—
`
`NC
`
`NC
`
`PR
`
`NC
`
`NC
`
`Nodes
`Bone
`Breast
`
`Bone
`
`Nodes
`Bone
`
`Bone
`
`Bone
`
`Nodes
`Breast
`
`Breast
`Bone
`
`Bone
`Bone
`
`60
`
`99
`
`90
`
`100
`
`ND
`
`30
`
`70
`
`(l828)"
`29
`
`<5
`
`97
`
`60
`
`0
`
`ND
`
`<5
`
`30
`
`(1)
`29
`
`PD
`
`NC
`
`PD
`
`PR
`
`NC
`
`PR
`
`NC
`
`NC
`NC
`
`<2
`
`33 +
`
`<2
`
`32+
`
`25
`
`9
`
`30+
`30+
`
`adv, advanced disease; PD, progressive disease; NC, no change; PR, partial response; ND, not done. 3% cells positive, immunoassay.
`“Biochemical assay (mol 1").
`
`Statistical analysis
`
`analyses were performed on an Apple
`statistical
`All
`Macintosh personal computer, using the StatView SE
`software programme
`(Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA,
`USA). Pharrnacokinectic data were analysed using para-
`metric statistics. Data relating to body weight,
`serum
`gonadotrophin, SHBG and lipid levels were analysed using
`non-parametric statistics. The null hypothesis was rejected at
`a probability level of P<0.05.
`
`Results
`
`Pharmacokinetics
`
`Serum concentrations of ICI 182780 were measured during
`the first month of treatment
`in 15 patients who started
`treatment at the 250 mg dose level and in 11 patients who
`remained on treatment with ICI 182780 during the sixth
`month. In the majority of patients, the measured C,,,,., was
`reached 8 or 9 days after the start of the drug administration.
`However, samples were not available between day 2 and day
`8. The profile was quite flat between days 2 and 8, supported
`by preclinical data in dogs where the Cm, was seen on day 1
`or 2. Following both the
`100 mg and 250 mg doses,
`continuous release of drug from the ICI 182780 slow release
`formulation was shown throughout the one month dosing
`interval. The profiles of the serum concentration of ICI
`
`182780 are shown in Figure 2. Comparison of data after the
`first and sixth monthly 250 mg doses of ICI 182780 showed
`that the mean exposure to the drug increased slightly after
`multiple dosing. Mean Cm,
`(which occurred on day 7)
`increased from 10.5 ng ml" to 12.8 ng ml", accompanied
`by increases in mean end-of-month concentrations from
`3.1 ng ml“
`to
`5.6 ng ml"
`and AUC values
`from
`140.5 ng day ml" to 206.8 ng day ml“ for the first and
`sixth months respectively in the 11 patients studied. Multiple
`dosing produced a 1.2-fold increase in Cm, and a 1.5-fold
`increase in AUC, indicating a degree of accumulation at the
`250 mg dose level. This greater exposure was not associated
`with any increased side-efl'ects or irritancy (see below). There
`was no significant difference in the median Cm, and AUC
`between responders and non-responders to treatment (Table
`II). After 6 months of treatment there was no significant
`difference between Cm, and AUC for patients who had a
`partial reponse (PR) compared with those with a no change
`(NC) response.
`
`Eflects on hormones and lipids
`
`The serum levels of FSH, LH, prolactin and SHBG, before
`and during treatment with ICI 182780, are shown in Figure
`3. The median levels of FSH and LH before starting
`treatment with ICI 182780 were below the normal range for
`post-menopausal women, whereas the median SHBG level
`was above the normal range, both possibly related to the
`
`|nnoPharma Exhibit 1007.0003
`
`

`

`11.5
`11
`10.5
`
`Concentration
`
`(ngm|’1)
`
`0
`
`2
`
`4
`
`6 81012141618202224262830
`
`Time (days)
`
`Figure 2 Mean serum concentrations of ICI 182780 during the
`first and sixth months of treatment. T, Profile at entry; - - -,
`profile month 6.
`
`agonist activity of previous treatment with tamoxifen. During
`the first 3 months of administration of ICI 182780, there was
`significant
`increases in the serum concentration of FSH
`(median pre- and post-treatment values 26 and 52 IU 1"
`respectively; P<0.05, Wilcoxon’s matched-pairs signed-rank
`test) and LH (median pre- and post-treatment values 26 and
`42 IU 1“ respectively; P<0.005). Thereafter, no further
`significant overall changes occurred in serum gonadotrophin
`levels but wide variation between individual patients were
`observed, refleeted in the broad interquartile ranges seen in
`Figure 3. Serum SHBG levels showed an overall trend to
`decrease following treatment with the specific anti-oestrogen,
`falling from a median level of 100 mmol l" pretreatment to
`55 mmol 1“ after 8 months of treatment (P=NS. Figure 3c).
`
`Ic|182780 and advanced breast cancer
`A Howell et al
`%
`303
`
`This overall reduction appeared to result predominantly from
`four patients who continued tamoxifen up to the time of
`starting ICI 182780. The remaining patients,
`including 11
`others on tamoxifen and four who had stopped tamoxifen
`some time before entry, showed very little change in serum
`SHBG levels during treatment. Serum prolactin levels
`remained within the normal
`range, and did not change
`significantly throughout the treatment period. There were no
`significant changes in serum levels of total cholesterol, LDL
`cholesterol, HDL cholesterol and triglyceride (Figure 3) for
`the 12 patients treated in the South Manchester Breast Unit
`during treatment with ICI 182780.
`
`Side-effects
`
`No serious drug-related adverse events occurred in any of
`the 19 patients treated with ICI 182780. Minor systemic
`adverse
`events were
`reported
`by
`two
`patients
`and
`comprised a transient bloodstained vaginal discharge and
`a subjective feeling of living in a ‘dream-like state’ (similar
`to one she had while taking tamoxifen) in one patient and
`alteration of body odour (noticed by her husband for a 1
`month period), possibly associated with increased hair
`greasiness,
`in the other. Administration of the pure anti-
`oestrogen was not associated with any alteration in the
`frequency of night sweats or hot flushes, if already present,
`and none were initiated. None of the patients reported
`vaginal dryness or altered libido despite direct questioning
`at each monthly out-patient attendence. The long-acting
`formulation of ICI 182780 used in this study appeared well
`tolerated locally at the site of injection despite the relatively
`large volume (5 ml) administered. One patient developed
`bruising
`over
`the
`buttock
`and
`a
`second
`developed
`tenderness at
`the injection site following drug administra-
`tion on one occasion each, and a third patient had local
`erythema
`at
`the
`injection site on one occasion. No
`clinically
`significant
`changes
`in
`full blood count
`or
`unexpected changes in the biochemical profile occurred in
`any of the patients participating in the study.
`Serial endometrial ultrasound examinations were per-
`
`Table II Results of Cm“ and AUC during months 1 and 6 according to response categories. There were no
`significant differences in drug kinetics between responders and non-responders
`On entry
`A! month 6
`
`C,,,,,,,
`(ngm1"1)
`4.4“
`1.6“
`5.5
`9.7
`29.9
`5.6
`
`AUC
`(ngdaymfl)
`53.1“
`25.1“
`105.7
`138.2
`289.3
`36.7
`
`Cm“
`(ngml")
`
`AUC
`(ng day mfl)
`
`15.8
`
`243.7
`
`Response
`Progressive disease
`
`No change
`
`Partial response
`
`Patient
`1
`4
`7
`9
`11
`13
`
`Median
`
`2
`12
`15
`17
`18
`19
`
`Median
`
`3
`5
`6
`8
`10
`14
`16
`
`Median
`
`5.6
`
`1.8”
`7.2
`9.0
`9.5
`10.3
`11.0
`
`9.3
`
`2.9“
`17.4
`7.7
`5.9
`14.8
`9.1
`4.4
`
`7.7
`
`79.4
`
`23.2“
`143.6
`107.8
`125.5
`183.2
`137.8
`
`131.6
`
`56.2“
`188.4
`118.3
`118.7
`206.6
`134.6
`72.8
`
`118.7
`
`7.5
`12.2
`15.8
`14.9
`10.2
`17.2
`
`12.8
`
`9.9
`17.6
`
`10.0
`9.1
`13.5
`12.0
`
`11.0
`
`135.8
`179.3
`201.7
`297.6
`156.1
`308.0
`
`190.9
`
`139.5
`203.0
`
`175.2
`191.7
`266.0
`190.8
`
`191.0
`
`“Patients 1-4 received 100 mg dose at entry and 250 mg dose from month 2 onwards.
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1006 PAGE 4
`
`|nnoPharma Exhibit 1007.0004
`
`

`

`lc|182780 and advanced breast cancer
` A Howell et al
`304
`
`CHOL
`
`TRIG
`
`HDLC
`
`LDLC
`
`6 5
`
`-
`'_ 4
`
`E3
`E 2
`
`4
`
`_ 3
`'_
`
`E2
`E
`
`4
`6 810121416
`‘Fume (months)
`
`0
`
`0
`
`2
`
`6 810121416
`4
`'|'1me(months)
`
`0 2 4 6 810121416
`Time(months)
`
`FSH
`
`SHBG
`
`200
`
`150
`
`100
`
`50
`
`0
`
`0
`
`2
`
`Prolactin
`
`12107
`
`5
`
`400 13
`350
`300
`
`.I_ 250
`S200
`"150
`100
`50
`0
`
`4 6 810121416
`Time(months)
`
`0
`
`2
`
`4
`
`6 810121416
`
`Time(months)
`
`0
`
`2
`
`4 6 810121416
`Time (months)
`
`2o
`0
`
`0 2
`
`4 6 810121416
`'|'Ime (months)
`
`1o
`
`4
`
`9121210 8 3 6 6
`8
`7
`7
`I 5

`5
`E
`4
`3
`
`21o
`
`Time (months)
`
`LH
`
`7019191714 9
`
`7
`
`5 6
`
`0
`
`2
`
`4 6 810121416
`
`0
`
`0
`
`2
`
`3
`
`'1
`—
`E 2
`E
`
`1
`
`100
`
`so
`
`7- 60
`2 40
`
`6°
`so
`
`‘T_ 40
`2 3o
`2o
`
`10
`0
`
`Figure 3 Median and interquartile ranges of lipids and hormones during treatment with ICI 182780. Numbers above the curves
`refer to the numbers of patients tested. Twelve patients were tested for the four lipids (CHOL, cholesterol; TRIG, triglyceride;
`HDLC, high-density lipoprotein; LDLC, low-density lipoprotein), 19 for the LH, FSH and SHBG and 13 for prolactin. Numbers
`decline because patients go off study after progression.
`
`(mm)
`
`Endometrialthickness
`
`12
`
`15
`
`18
`
`1'1me (months)
`
`Figure 4 Serial ultrasound estimations of endometrial thickness
`in five patients. Thickened endometrium compared with normal
`post-menopausal women was thought to be due to treatment with
`tamoxifen. No significant change occurred up to 15 months of
`treatment with ICI 182780.
`
`thickness
`formed in five responding patients. Endometrial
`was greater than the expected <2 mm usually found in post-
`menopausal women,
`in all patients. The thickness of the
`endometrium remained unchanged in all patients during
`treatment with ICI 182780 (Figure 4). Endometrial histology
`was reviewed on one patient who had a hysterectomy. This
`was
`reported as
`showing an atrophic post-menopausal
`pattern with cystic change. The glands were lined by
`flattened and cuboidal epithelium. There was no mitotic
`activity, epithelial ectoplasia or polyp formation. There were
`
`Table III Response rate and durations of response to ICI 182780 in
`relation to duration of previous treatment with tamoxifen
`Response
`ICI182780
`
`Durations (months)
`
`Number
`(%)
`
`Partial
`
`7 (37)
`
`25+ (PRl9)“, 33+ (NC8), 32+ (PR24)
`25+ (A67), 12 (A74), 8 (A20), 3 (A77)
`
`No change
`
`6 (32)
`
`29+ (NC8), 33+ (A74), 23+ (A61), 30+
`(NC48), 30+ (A23), 9 (NC34)
`
`Progression
`
`6 (31) All patients progressed in <8 weeks
`(A48, A45, NC7, PR8, A9, NCl2)
`“Letters in brackets indicate response to tamoxifen when given for
`advanced disease (PR, partial
`remission; NC, no change; PD,
`progressive disease) or if given as an adjuvant therapy (A). The
`numbers in the brackets
`indicate duration of treatment with
`tamoxifen.
`
`no significant changes in body weight during treatment with
`ICI 182870. Mean body weight (kg:s.d.) was 63.8i14.0
`(n=l3) at
`the beginning of treatment, 64.9il5.8 (n=ll)
`after 6 months, 64.5:l7.2 (n=9) after 10 months and
`64.21183 (n=9) after 16 months of treatment with ICI
`182780.
`
`Response
`
`All 19 patients are evaluable for response to ICI 182780
`(Table III). Six patients were unresponsive de novo and
`showed objective evidence of disease progression within 2
`months of commencing treatment. The remaining 13 patients
`(69%) all
`responded to treatment with the specific anti-
`oestrogen for a median duration of 25 months. Seven patients
`(37%) showed PR5 for 33+, 32+, 25+, 25,
`I2, 8 and 3
`months, and six patients (32%) showed NC responses for
`33 + , 30+ , 30+ , 29, 23 and 9 months. Thus five patients are
`still in remission and continuing treatment with ICI 182780
`after 30-33 months. Responses have been observed in six of
`the nine women who progressed while receiving tamoxifen as
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1006 PAGE 5
`
`|nnoPharma Exhibit 1007.0005
`
`

`

`IcI182780 and advanced breast cancer
`A Howell et at
`
`305
`
`treatment for advanced breast cancer as well as in seven of
`the ten women who relapsed after treatment with tamoxifen
`as adjuvant
`therapy. There appeared to be no association
`between duration of treatment with tamoxifen and subse-
`quent response to ICI 182780 (Table III).
`
`Discussion
`
`investigation of long-term
`This study represents the first
`administration of the specific anti-oestrogen, ICI 182780, to
`patients with breast cancer and demonstrates that predicted
`therapeutic levels of ICI 182780, as judged from animal
`experiments (Wake1ing et al., 1991; Dukes et al., 1993) and
`our previous short phase I study (DeFriend et al., 1994b) can
`be achieved and maintained for 1 month following a single
`i.m. injection of the long-acting formulation used. Treatment
`with ICI 182780 was associated with minor effects on serum
`hormones and lipid levels, produced few side-effects and
`resulted in a high response rate after tamoxifen failure,
`together with a median reponse duration of 25 months.
`Pharrnacokinetic data concerning the release characteris-
`tics of the drug into the serum in this study were found to be
`similar to those previously demonstrated in adult female
`monkeys (Dukes et al., 1993). From studies on inhibition of
`endometrial proliferation in the monkey and inhibition of
`tumour proliferation in a previous phase I study,
`it was
`predicted that serum levels of ICI 182780 in the range of 2-
`3 ng ml" were consistent with a therapeutic effect in patients
`with advanced breast cancer. However, a direct pharmaco-
`kinetic—pharrnacodynamic link is not proven with the few
`patients studied to date. Serum drug concentrations in excess
`of this were observed with the 250 mg dose used in the
`present study for most of the first and all of the sixth month.
`However,
`there was evidence of drug accumulation after
`multiple dosing, such that after 6 months treatment there was
`an 80% increase in mean end of month drug levels and a
`50% increase in the AUC compared with data from month 1.
`These data suggest
`that lower doses of the drug may be
`effective
`in maintaining therapeutic serum drug levels,
`although further clinical studies are required to confirm this
`hypothesis.
`Previous animal studies with ICI 182780 have shown that
`the activity of specific anti-oestrogens may vary between
`different oestrogen target sites
`(Wakeling, 1993).
`In the
`present study, we have attempted to obtain preliminary data
`on the effects of long-term administration of ICI 182780 on
`the pituitary gland/hypothalamus, the liver and the endome-
`trium. Serum gonadotrophin levels significantly increased
`during the first 3 months of treatment with ICI 182780 and
`then remained stable thereafter. This change is in contra-
`distinction to that
`seen with the triphenylethylene anti-
`oestrogen,
`tamoxifen, which reduces serum levels of FSH
`and LH in post-menopausal patients
`because of
`its
`oestrogenic effect on the pituitary gland and hypothalamus
`(Willis et al., 1977). All but four patients in the present study
`were treated with tamoxifen up until
`treatment with ICI
`182780 was initiated. Levels of FSH and LH at this time were
`below the range for normal post-menopausal women, which
`is attributable to previous therapy with tamoxifen. The rise of
`gonadotrophins during the first 3 months of treatment with
`ICI 182780 may therefore have been a passive effect caused
`by cessation of
`tamoxifen rather
`than an active anti-
`oestrogen effect of the new agent. The fact
`that gonado-
`trophin levels rose to well within post-menopausal values and
`then remained stable would support the view that ICI 182780
`is without effect on gonadotrophin levels. This apparent lack
`of activity of the specific anti-oestrogen on the hypothalamus
`and pituitary gland is further supported by the findings that
`ICI 182780 did not
`initiate or exacerbate hot flushes or
`sweats in the present study, nor did it produce significant
`changes in serum prolactin levels.
`Treatment with tamoxifen has been reported to increase
`serum levels of SHBG secondary to a probable oestrogenic
`
`effect of tamoxifen on the liver (Sakai et al., 1978). The
`levels of SHBG in some of our patients before starting
`therapy with ICI 182780 were high, consistent with the
`oestrogenic
`effect of prior
`treatment with tamoxifen.
`Following commencement of treatment with ICI 182780, a
`slight decline in SHBG levels occurred, consistent with
`tamoxifen withdrawal, but thereafter median levels of SHBG
`remained in the middle of
`the normal
`range for our
`laboratory, suggesting that the specific anti-oestrogen may
`have little effect on SHBG synthesis in the liver. A lack of
`efl‘ect of the compound on the liver is further suggested by
`evaluation of lipid changes. Tamoxifen is known to reduce
`levels of cholesterol and LDL cholesterol and is associated
`with an increase in triglycerides and HDL cholesterol
`consistent with an oestrogenic effect on the liver (Bertelli
`et al., 1988; Love et al. 1990). None of these changes
`reported during treatment with tamoxifen were observed
`during the present study. This would further suggest that
`ICI 182780 is peripherally selective with respect to the liver.
`However we cannot explain why there was not the expected
`changes in lipids as patients came off tamoxifen.
`The lack of apparent adverse effects of ICI 182780 seen in
`the present study would, if confirmed in future larger trials,
`give the specific anti-oestrogen potential advantages over
`currently available second-line endocrine agents. The ob-
`served lack of effect of ICI 182780 on body weight over a
`period of study that ranged from 6 to 16 months would give
`the new agent a potential advantage over megestrol acetate,
`the most widely used second-line endocrine therapy in breast
`cancer, which resulted in weight gain of > 5% of body weight
`in 25% of patients in one study (Willemse et al., 1990) and a
`median weight gain of 9 lbs after 180 days of treatment in
`another (Cruz et al., 1990). Overall, 83% of patients reported
`side-effects during treatment with megestrol acetate (Willemse
`et al., 1990).
`the
`tamoxifen,
`troublesome side-effects of
`The most
`current
`first-line endocrine therapy of choice,
`are the
`inception or exacerbation of hot flushes and sweats and the
`initiation of vaginal discharge. As already stated, ICI 182780
`did not induce or exacerbate hot flushes or sweats in the
`present study and furthermore did not cause symptoms of
`vaginal dryness or altered libido. Since the vaginal discharge
`experienced by 10-33% of patients during tamoxifen therapy
`is thought to be related to the oestrogenic activity of the
`drug, we expected ICI 182780 to be associated with vaginal
`dryness and irritation; the fact that this did not occur further
`suggests that ICI 182780 may be peripherally selective with
`respect to oestrogen target-site activity.
`thickness were
`Serial measurements of endometrial
`obtained from five patients during treatment with ICI
`182780. Before commencing treatment with the specific anti-
`oestrogen, the endometrial thickness in all five patients was
`greater
`than that
`found in the nonnal post-menopausal
`uterus. We assume that the overall ‘thickening’ we detected
`was related to previous tamoxifen therapy as this phenom-
`enon has been widely reported. During the relatively short
`duration of the present study, there was no further increase in
`thickening during treatment with ICI 182780. However there
`was also no decline in thickness as might be expected
`following treatment with a specific anti-oestrogen. Whether
`this finding reflected a true increase in endometrial thickness
`or an additional swelling of the myometrium, which has also
`been described in women taking tamoxifen (Cohen et al.,
`1994),
`is n

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket