throbber
18TH
`
`EDITION
`
`Remington’s
`
`ALFONSO R GENNARO
`
`Editor, and Chairman
`of the Editorial Board
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2132 p. 1
`InnoPharma Licensing LLC V. AstraZeneca AB IPR2017-00904
`
`

`

`Pharmaceutical
`
`Sciences
`
`1990
`
`MACK PUBLISHING COMPANY
`
`Easton, Pennsylvania 18042
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2132 p. 2
`
`

`

`Entered unending to Actof Congress, in the year_1.885 by Joseph PRemington,.
`in the Office of the Librarian of Congresa', at Washington DC
`
`Copyright 1389, 1894, 1905. 1907. .1917, byJoeeph P Remington
`
`Copyright 1926, 1936. by Joseph P Remington Etate
`
`Copyright 1948. 1951, by The Philadelphia College of Pharmacy and Scheme
`
`Copyright 9 1.956, 1980. 1965. 1970,1975, 1930. 1985. 1990, 113* The Philadelphia college 01"
`Pharmacy and Science
`
`All Rights Reserved
`
`Library of Congress Catalog Card No. 60-53334
`
`ISBN 0-912me
`
`The use animate-a! famine from UEAN and the USP Dictionm offlmg Names is by
`permission-of The USP Convention. The Convention is not responsible for any inaccuracy
`con-mined ha-ein.
`
`NOTICE—This sex: is not intended to represent, nor shall it be interpreted to be. the equivalent
`of or a substitute for the official United States Hmmacopeia (USP) andfor theNatienai
`Formulary LNFJ. In the event of any difference or discrepancy between the current official
`USP or NFetnndarda of strength, quality. purity, paekaghIg-nnd labeling for drugs and
`representations of them herein. the center: and effect of the official campendia shall
`prevail.
`
`Printed in the United State; ofAmen’ca by the Mack Printing Company. EbstM.Pennsylnania
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2132 p. 3
`
`

`

`Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences .
`
`. . a treatise on the theory
`
`and practice of the pharmaceutical sciences, with essential
`
`information about pharmaceutical and medicinal agents: also a guide
`
`to the professional responsibilities of the pharmacist as the
`
`dmguinfonnation specialist of the health team. . . A textbook
`
`and reference work for pharmacists. physicians and other
`
`practitioners of the pharmaceutical and medical sciences.
`
`EDITORS
`
`_
`
`Alfonso R Gennaro, Chairman
`
`Thomas Medwick
`
`Grafton D Chase
`Ara Der Marderosion
`
`Stewart-C Howey
`
`Daniel A Hussar
`
`Edward G Ripple
`Joseph B Schwartz
`
`Ewart A Swinyard
`
`Gilbert L Zinls
`
`AUTHORS
`
`The 109 chapters of this edition of Remington's Pharmaceutical
`Sciences were written by the editors, by members of the
`
`Editorial Board. and by other authors listed on pages ix to" xi.
`
`Managing Editor
`
`John .E Hoover
`
`Editorial Assistaat
`
`Bonnie Brigham Packer
`
`Director
`
`Allen Mlsher 1965—1990
`
`Eighteenth Edition—1990
`
`Published in the 170th year of the
`
`PHILADELPHIA COLLEGE OF PHARMACY AND SCIENCE
`
`AstraZencca Exhibit 2132 p. 4
`
`

`

`Table of flantents
`
`Part1
`
`Orientation.
`
`1 Scope ......... . . . . . . .....................
`2 EvolutionotPharmacy ......................
`3 Ethics .....
`.
`. . .
`4 The ProcticeofCommunity Pharmacy
`5 Opportunities for Pharmacists in the Pharmaceuti-
`oailndusrry
`. . . .
`6 Pharmacists In Government
`
`. . . . . . ..
`
`7 Drug Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..........
`8 Research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... . . . . . . ..
`
`Part:
`
`Pharmaceutics
`
`. .
`9 Metrology and Calculation ......... . . . . . . . .
`10 Statistics
`. . . . . . . . . .
`. . . . ..
`. . . . . .
`11 ComputerScience
`12 Calculus ................ . . . . ..............
`13 Molecular Structure. Properties and States of
`Matter
`.. . . . . U... . . . . . . . ... . .
`. . u........
`(Sample): Formation . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`14
`15 Thermodynamics...........................
`16 Solutions and Phase Equilibria
`. . . . ..
`17
`lonlc Solutions and Electrolytic Equilibria
`18 ReactionKinetics...........................
`19 DisperseSystems...........................
`20 Rheology ................ . .
`.
`. . . ...........
`
`Part I
`
`Pharmaceutical chemistry
`
`InorganlcPharn-raoeutioal Chemistry
`21
`22 Organic Pharmaceutical Chemistry . . . . . . . . . . . .
`23 NaturalPtoducts
`24 Drug Nomenclature—United States Adopted
`Names ......n...........................
`25 Structure-Amt! Relationship and Drug
`Design ............ . . . . . . ... . . . . . .........
`
`Part 4
`
`Testing and Analysis
`
`26 AnoiysisofMedictnais
`27 Biological'l'esting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`26 CIinicalAnalvsis “...”... . . . . .............
`29 solute-Ist-natoo-elta-oaoos
`30 Instrumental Methods of Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`81 Dissolution . . . . . . .
`
`3
`6
`20
`28
`
`33
`36
`
`49
`60
`
`69
`10-1
`1:55
`145
`
`158
`1B2
`197
`207
`22B
`247
`257
`310
`
`329
`356
`360
`
`412
`
`422
`
`I135
`464
`495
`
`555
`589
`
`Part 5
`
`Radioisotope in Pharmacy and fledkine
`
`32 Fundamentalsailiadloisotapes ...............
`83 MedicolApplioatiansofRadioisotopes .........
`
`605
`624
`
`Part 6
`
`Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Agents
`
`34 Diseases: Manifestations and Parlia-
`
`physlolagy ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .........
`35 Drug Absorption. Action and Disposition ...“...
`36 Basic Pharmacokinetlcs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`37 Clinical Pharmaaoklnettcs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`
`06 TopiaalDtugs ....... . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . .
`39 Gastrointestinal Drugs
`. . . . . . . .
`40 Blood. Fluids. Electrolytes and Hematologic
`Drugs
`. . . . .
`. . . . . . . . . . . .
`. . . . . .
`41 Cardiovascular Drugs
`42 RespiratoryDrugs ......... . . . . . . . ..........
`43 Sympathomlmetlc Drugs . . . . . . . . .
`. . . . . . . . . . . .
`
`. . . ...
`. . . . ..
`
`655
`697
`72.5
`746
`
`757
`774
`
`600
`631
`660
`B70
`
`46
`45
`
`47
`
`49
`
`51
`52
`50
`
`55
`
`57
`56
`
`61
`62
`
`65
`
`67
`66
`69
`70
`
`71
`72
`
`73
`74
`
`75
`76
`77
`78
`79
`
`51
`
`65
`56
`67
`86
`69
`
`91
`92
`
`95
`94
`95
`96
`
`Cholinomimetic Drugs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`Adrenergic and Adrenergic Neuron [Hacking
`Drugs
`. . .
`. . . . .
`.
`. . . .
`. . . . . . . ..
`Antimuscarinic and Antispasmodic Drugs . . . .
`. . .
`Skeletal Muscle Relaxants . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . .
`
`. . . .
`
`.
`
`. . . . .........
`DIureticDrugs 4...... . . . . . . . . .
`Uterine and Antimtgraine Drugs
`.. . . . . . . . . . . . .
`Hormones............ . . .
`.
`.
`. . . . . . . . .
`. ..
`Vitamins ondOtherliuirlents
`Enzymes
`. . . . . . . . .
`. . .
`. . . . . . . . .
`General Anesthetics . . .
`. . . . . . . .
`. . . . . . . . . . . . .
`LocaiAnesthetics.............. . . . .
`. . .
`. . . ...
`
`. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
`.
`Sedatives and Hypnotlcs .
`Antleplieptlcs
`. . . . .
`. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`.
`. .
`.
`. . . . .
`Psychopharmocoiogic Agents
`.. . . . . . .
`. .. . . . .
`.
`Analgesics and Antlpyretics . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`.
`. . .
`Histamine and Antihistamines . . .
`.
`. . . . . . . . . . . .
`Central Nervous System Stimulants . . .
`. . .
`. . . . . .
`Antlneaplastic and immunosuppressive Drugs . . .
`Antimicrobial Drugs .........................
`Parasiticides . . . . . . . . . .
`. . . .
`. . . . . . .
`. . . . . . . . . .
`Pesticides . . . . . . . . . . .
`.
`.
`. . . . . . . . .. .
`. . . . . . . . .
`
`. . . . . . . .
`. . .
`Diagnostic Drugs . . .
`Pharmaceutical Necessities
`
`. . . . . . . . . . . . .
`
`669
`
`893
`907
`916
`
`929
`943
`966
`1002
`1035
`10:39
`1046
`
`1057
`1072
`1062
`1097
`1123
`1132
`1 138
`1163
`1242
`1249
`
`1272
`1266
`
`1300
`Adverse Drugfieoctlons
`Pharmacogenetics . . . . ..u... . . . . . . . ..........1344
`Pharmacological Aspects of Drug Abuse . .. . . . .
`.
`13-49
`Introduction of New Drugs
`. . . . . . . . . . . .
`. . . . . . .
`1565
`
`Part 7
`
`Biological Products
`
`. . . . . . . .
`. . . . . . .
`Principles of immunology .
`immunizing Agents and Diagnostic Sitin
`. . . ..
`. . .
`.
`Antigens.. . . . . . . . . . . . .
`. . .
`AllergenicExtracts..........................
`Biotechnolon and Drugs . . . .. . . .
`.
`. . . . .. . . . . .
`
`. . .
`
`1379
`
`1069
`1405
`1416
`
`Part 0
`
`Pharmaceutical Preparations and Their
`manufacture
`
`Pretormulatian ... ...”..........u.........
`Bioovailabiliry and Bioequivalency Testing . . . . .
`Separation”... . . . . . ... . . . . . . .............
`Sterilization . . . . . . . .
`. . . . . . . . .
`. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`TonicitY. Osmoticlty. Utmolaliiy and Osmalarlty .
`Plastic Packaging Materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`Stability of Pharmaceutical Products
`. . . . .. . . . . .
`Quality Assurance and Control
`. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`Solutions. Emulsions. SUspenslons and
`Extractlves ........ . . . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . ..
`
`. . . . .
`
`. . . . . . . . .. . . . .
`
`Parenteral Preparations . .
`lntravonousAdmixmres
`. . . . ..
`. .
`. . . .
`OphthalmlcPreparatlons .. . . . . . .
`.
`. . . . . .
`.
`. . . .
`Medicated Applications . . .. . . . . .
`Powders........ .
`. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`. . . .
`.
`.
`Oral Solid Dosage Forms . . . . . t . . . . . . . . .
`Coating of Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms . . . . . . .
`Sustained-Release Drug Delivery Systems . . . .
`. .
`Aerosols . . . .
`. .
`.
`.
`. . .
`
`1435
`1451
`1459
`1470
`1461
`1499
`1504
`1515
`
`1519
`
`1545
`1570
`1561
`1596
`1615
`1633
`1666
`1676
`1694
`
`Part 9
`
`Pharmaceutical Practice
`
`AmbulatoryPatientCare
`. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .
`Institutional Patient Care.
`Long-Term Care Facilities . . . . . . . . .
`. . . . . . . . . . .
`The Pharmacist and Public Health . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`
`1715
`1757
`1756
`1770
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 213 2 p. 5
`
`

`

`97
`95
`
`100
`101
`102
`103
`104
`105
`
`. . . . . . .
`
`The Patient: Behavioral Determinants .. .
`Pafleanammunlcaiian
`Dngducailan
`PafleniCamplianoe
`ThePrescrlpflan
`Dmglnieracfions...........................
`ClinicalDrugLneraiure......................
`Health Accessories
`
`SurgioaISUppiies ...........................
`
`1768
`1796
`1800
`1613
`1825
`1642
`1859
`1864
`1895
`
`106
`107
`108
`
`109
`
`PaisanControl ..............................
`
`LawchwemingPhan-nacy ...........'..‘....
`Community Pharmacy Economics and
`.ulou-Iu..-o.-u.-I.o-uoo.-.-'
`Management
`DentalServiees ............................
`
`1905
`191d
`
`19m
`195?
`
`Index
`
`Alphabeflclndex ..........................
`
`1967
`
`xvi
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 213 2 p. 6
`
`

`

`Chapter 9
`
`Merrology and Calculation
`
`Werner lowerrthul. PhD
`Prol'mor of Phonnocy and Pnurmocourtcs and Praiesscr cl Educationol Development ond Flounan
`Salton] of Pharmacy. Medical-College of Virginie. Virginia Commonwealth University
`Richmond. VA 232950551.
`
`The first technical operation which the student of phar-
`macy must learn is the manipulation of balances. weights
`and measures of volume. This entails estudy of the various
`systems of weights and measures. their relationships and a
`mastery of the mathematics involved. This chapter consid-
`ers the fundamental principles of metrology underlying the
`testing. manufacturing and compounding of pharmaceutical
`preparations. under three headings:
`Weights and Measures—en accumulation of facts commuting the
`various systems. with tables of conversion factors and practical equiva-
`
`lents. The relationships among. the various systems of weights and
`measures are clarified.
`
`Weighing and Measuring—e discussion of the various types of huh
`snces, particularly preacription balances. and methods o! using. testing
`and protecting them: also of various devices and methods of their use for
`measuring large or small volumes of fluids.
`
`Density and Specific Gravity—e consideration of the massivolumc
`ratio of a substance {density}. and the ratio of the weight {mass} of one
`substance to the weight {mess-l or another substance telrcn as the stan-
`tlurd i specific gravity}.
`
`Weights and Measures
`
`Weight is a measure of the gravitational force acting on a
`body and is directly proportional to its mass. The latter.
`being a constant based on inertia, never varies, whereas
`weight varies slightly with latitude. altitude, temperature
`and pressure. The effect of these factors usually is not
`considered unless very precise weighings and large quanti-
`ties are involved
`Measure is the determination of the volume or extent of a
`body. Temperature and pressure have a pronounced effect.
`especially on gases or liquids. These factors therefore. are.
`considered when making precision measurements.
`All standard weights and measures in this country are
`derived from or based on the United States National Proto-
`type Standards of the Meter and the Kilogram. made of
`platinum—iridium. in the custody of the National Bureau of
`Standards at Washington. DC.
`
`History
`
`A brief outline of the origin of the many systems of weights
`and measures may help in remembering essential distinc-
`tions between them. The sense of the weight of a body
`cannot be conveyed intelliginy to themind unless a means
`of comparison is chosen. As weight is the measure of the
`gravitational force of a body. so this force is expressed in
`terms of standards of resistance. which exactly balance the
`body and keep it in equilibrium when used with a mechani-
`cal device constructed for this specific purpose. Such stan-
`dards are termed weights and the mechanical devices are
`called balances or scales.
`The standards which have been chosen by various nations
`are arbitrary. and instances are common where different
`standards are in use at the same time in the same country.
`Many of the ancient standards clearly are referable to vari-
`able parts of the human body. as nail. foot. span. pace. cubit
`(length of the forearm) and fathom or faction (stretch ofthe
`armsld.‘ In the history of metrology three periods may be
`trace '
`L The Ancient period. during which the old classical standards orig-
`inated. terminated with the decline ofthe Roman Empire.
`It is interest-
`ing to note that the unitof distance used at the present day by all nations
`
`in maritime measurements is the nautical or meridian mile or lie. of a
`degree of the earth's equatorial circumference. and that this is exactly
`equal to 1000 Egyptian fathoms or 4000 Egyptian cubits. These Egyp-
`tian measurements. which have persisted for more than 4000 yr. were
`based on astronomical or meridian measurements which were recorded
`lmperishahly in the great Pyramid of Ghizeh. whose perimeter is exactly
`500 of these fathom. or V: nautical mile.
`2. The Medieval period extended to the 16th century. During this
`period the old standards were lost. but their names were preserved. and
`European nations adopted various independent standards.
`3. The Modern period extends from the 18th century to the present.
`Since the 17th ccntury the effortsol’ rnosl. enlightened nations have been.
`directed toward scientific accuracy and simplicity. and during the
`present century toward international uniformity.
`
`Historical metrology is also referred to as Documentary
`Mctroiogy. which is concerned with the study of monuments
`and records of ancient periods. and Inductive Metrology.
`which is concerned With the accumulation of data concern-
`ing the measurementof large numbers of objects which have
`been referred to as standards but which have no exact mea-
`sure eacept by statutory regulation.
`The English Systems—In Great Britain, in 1266. the
`Slat Act of the reign of Henry III declared “that by the
`consent of the whole realm of England the measure of the
`King was made—that is to say. that an English silver penny
`called the sterling. round and without clipping. shall weigh
`thirty-two grains of wheat. well dried and gathered out of
`the middle of the ear; and twenty pence (pennyweights) do
`malts an ounce and twalve ounces a pound, and eight pounds
`do make a gallon of wine. and eight wine gallons do make a
`bushel, which is the eighth of a quarter."
`The 16-02 1h (aooirdupois pound}. undoubtedly of Roman
`origin. was introduced at the time of the first civilization of
`the British island. The word “haherdepois,” according to
`Gray. was, however. first used in English laws in 1303. A
`statute of Edward I {AD 1304] states “that every pound of
`mousy or of medicines is of twenty shillings weight. but the
`pound of all other things is twenty-five shillings weight.
`The ounce of medicines consists of twenty pence. and the
`pound contains twelve ounces (the Troy Pound}. but in
`other thingsthe pound contains fifteen ounces. in both cases
`the ounce weighing twanty pence."
`These laws unfold the theory of the ancient weights and
`
`Asnachcca Exhibit 2132 p. 7
`
`

`

`70
`
`CHAPTER 9
`
`measures of Great Britain. and reveal the standards. is. a
`natural object. grains of wheat: a difference axisted then
`between the Troy and the avoirdupois pound, but the
`weights now in use are If... heavier than those of Edward 1.
`due to the change subsequently made in the value of the coin
`by the sovereign.
`In addition. the true pennyweight stan-
`dard was lost and, in the next revision of the weights and
`measures. the present troy and avoirdupois standards were
`adopted.
`The troy weight is of still earlier origin. The great fairs of
`the 8th and 9th centuries were held at several French cities.
`including Troyes. the gathering place of traders from all
`countries. Coins frequently were mutilated so that they
`were sold by weight. and the standard weight of Troyes for
`selling coin was adopted for precious metals and medicines
`in all parts of Europe. The troy ounce and the avoirdupois
`ounce originally were intended to have the same weight. but
`after the revision it was found that the avoirdupois ounce
`was lighter by 421.5 gr than the troy ounce. The subsequent
`adoption of troy weight by the London College of Physicians
`in 1618. on the recommendation of Sir Theodore Turquet de
`la Mayerne. who compiled their first pharmacopoeia. has
`entailed upon all apothecarias who are goiter-nod by British
`customs. to this day. the very great inconvenience of buying
`and selling medicines by one system of weights (the ouoirdu-
`pair) and compounding them hyanother (the cpotheccry or
`troy).
`In the next century efforts were made toward reforming
`the standards. and the Royal Society. in 1736. began the
`work. which ended in the preparation. under the direction of
`the House of Commons. by Mr Bird. of the standard "yard"
`and standard “pound” troy in 1760. Copies of these were-
`prepared and no intentional deviation has been made since.
`In 1813. on account of the growing popularity of the French
`Metric System. and in View of the desirability of securing a
`standard which could he recovered easily in case of loss or
`destruction and which should be commensurable with a sim-
`ple unit. steps were taken in England to secure these advan-
`tages. The labors ofEnglish scientists led to the adoption of
`the Imperial measures and standards, which were legalized
`January 1. 1826. and are now in use in Great Britain, thus
`introducing another element of confusion into an already
`complicated subject.
`In this system the yard is equivalent to 36 in. and its
`length was determined by comparison with .a pendulum
`beating seconds of mean time. in a vacuum. at the tempera-
`ture of 62°F at the level of the sea in the latitude of London.
`which length was found to he 39.1393 in. The pound troy
`(containing 5760 gr) was determined by comparison with a
`given measure of distilled water under specified conditions.
`Thus. a cubic inch of distilled water was weighed with brass
`weights in air at 62°F, the barometer at 30 in. and it weighed
`252.458 gr. The standard for measures of capaci-twl in Great
`Britain (either dry or liquid} is the Imperial gallon. which
`contains 10 lb avoir (each 7000 gr) of distilled water weighed
`in air at 62°F. the barometer standing at 30 in. The bushel
`contains 8 such gal.
`Washington. in his first annual message to Congress. Jan~
`uary. 1790. recommended the-establishment of uniformity in
`currency. weights and measures. Action was taken. with
`reference to the currency. and recommendations were made
`by Jefferson. then Secretary of State. for the adoption of
`either of the currently used English systems or a decimal
`system. However. nothing was accomplished until in
`1819-1820 when efforts again were made in the US to secure
`uniformity in the standards which were in use by the several
`states. Finally. after a lengthy investigation. the Secretary
`of the Treasury. on June 14. 1-836. was directed by Congress-
`to furnish each state in the Union with a complete set of the
`revised standards. and thus the troy pound [5760 gr). the
`
`ouoirdupois pound (7000 grl and the yard [36 in) are all
`identical with the British standards; but the US gallon is
`quite different. the old wine gallon oil-131 cu in. containing
`58.3722 gr of distilled water at its maximum density.
`weighed in air at 62°F. the barometer standing at 30 in.
`being retained. while the bushel contained 77.274 lb of water
`under the same-conditions, thus making the dry quart about
`16% greater in volume than the liquid quart.
`In 1364 the use of the metric measures was legalized in
`Great Britain. but not made compulsory. and in 1866 the US
`followed the same course. By the US Law of July 28. 1866.
`all lengths. areas and cubic measures are derived from the
`international meter equivalent to 39.37 in. Since 1893 the
`US Office of Standard Weights and Measures has been au-
`thorized to derive the yard from. the meter. 1 yd equals
`3509/3537 m. and the customary weights are referred to the
`kilogram. by Executive order approved April 5. 1393'. Ca-
`pacities were to be based on the equivalent. I cu dm equals 1
`L. the dosimeter being equal to 3.937 in. The gallon still
`remains at 231 cu in and the bushel contains 2150.42 cu in.
`This makes the liquid quart equal to 0.946 L and the dry
`quart 1.1013 L. while the Imperial quart is 1.1359 L. The
`customary weights are derived from the international kilo-
`gram. based on the value that 1 avo'ir lb = 4535924277 3 and
`that “when avoir- 1h equals 1 troy lb.
`Avoirdupcis weight is used in general in the US for com-
`mercial purposes. including the buying and selling of drugs
`on the large scale and occasionally on prescription orders.
`The Metric System-me idea of adopting a scientific
`standard for the basis of metrology. which could be reveri-
`fied accurately. Was suggested by a number of individuals
`after the Renaissance. Jean Pi'card. the French astronomer.
`in the 17th century. proposed to take as a unit the length of a
`pendulum heating 1 sea of time at sea level. at a latitude of
`45".
`James Watt. the English inventor. in 1783 first suggested
`the application of decimal notation. and the commensurahil-
`ity of weight. length and volume. The French National
`Assembly in 1-790 appointed a committee to decide the pref-
`erability of the pendulum standard or a terrestrial measure
`of some kind as a basis for the new system. The committee
`reported in 1791 in favor of the letter. and commissions were
`appointed to measure an arc of meridian and to perfect the
`details of the commensurahility of the units and of nomen—
`clature. However. certain inaccuracies were inherent in the
`early standards and they do not hear to each other the
`intended exact relationships. The present accepted stan-
`dards are defined in publiCations of the National Bureau of
`Standards.
`
`in its original conception the meter was the fundamental unit of the
`metric system. and all units of length and capacity were to be derived
`directly from the ureter which was intended to be equal to one ton-
`millionth of the earth's quadrant. Furthermore.
`it originally was
`planned that the unit of mass. the kilogram. should be identical with the
`mass of a cubic decimeter of water at its maxhnum density. At present.
`however. the units of length and mass are defined independently of these
`conceptions.
`For all practical purposes calibration of length standards in indusz
`and scientific laboratories is accomplished by comparison with the mate-
`rial standard of length:
`the distance between two engraved lines on a
`platlntun-iridium bar. the international prototype meter. which is kept
`at the international Bureau of Weights and Measures.
`The kilogram is defined independently as the mass ore definite pinto
`cum-iridium standard.the international Prototype Kilogram. which is
`also inept at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures. The
`Liter is defined as the volume of a kilogram of water. at standard atmo.
`spherio pressure. and at the temperature of its maximum density. op.-
`roximstely 4‘0. The meter is thus the fundamean unit on which are
`used all metric standards and measurements of length and urea. and of
`volumes derived from linear measurements.
`or basic scientific interest is that on October 14. 1960. the 11th Gen—
`eral Conference on Weights and Measures. meeting in Paris. adopted a
`new interimtional definition for the standard of length:
`the meter is-
`now defined as the length equal to 1.650.763.73 wavelengths of the
`
`AstraZencca Exhibit 2132 p. 8
`
`

`

`Int-angered light of the krypton-'30 isotope. This standard will he used
`in actual measurements only when extreme accuracy is needed.
`The kilogram is the fundamental unit on which are based all metric
`standards of mass. The llter is aaecondary or derived unit of capacity or
`volume. The L is larger by about 2'? ppm than the cube of the tenth of
`the meter. is. the co din—that is l l. = 1.00002? cu tire.
`The Immersion tables in this publication which involve the relative
`length of the yard and meter are based upon the relation:
`1 m = 30.3?
`in. contained in the act of Congress of 1066. From this relation it
`{allows that 1 in. = 25.40005 mm {nearly}.
`In recent years engineering and industrial interests the world ever
`have urged the adoption nfthe simpler relation. 1 in. = 25.4 mm exactly.
`which differs from the preceding value by only 2 ppm. This simpler
`relation has not as yet been adopted officially by either Great Britain or
`the US but is in wide industrial use.
`
`In the US. the abbreviation cc still persists in general use
`and is taken as synonymous for the more correct term ml..
`The USP IX and NF IV adopted the term milliliter with its
`abbreviated form mil. but it proved so unpopular in practice
`that the following phermacopeie] convtlon directed the
`return to the older term cubic centimeter {cc}.
`In 1955 USP
`XV and NF X. however. once again adopted the term millili-
`ter with the abbreviation ml.
`Nationaljealoueies and the natural antipathy to changing
`established customs interfered greatly with the adoption of
`the metric system during the early part of the 19th century.
`At present the metric system is in use in every maior country
`of the world. In the US and and Great Britain it is legalized
`for reference to and-definition nfntherstsndatds. is in exclu-
`sive use by nearly all scientists. and by inch segments
`of industry and the public.
`In the US the metric system was
`legalized in 1866. but not made compulsory, and in the same
`year the international prototype meter and kilogram were
`adopted as fundamental standards. As corporations be-
`come more international. the need for a universal standard
`increases.
`The US silver coinage was based upon the metric system.
`the half dollar being exactly 12% g and the quarter and the
`dime being of the proportionate weights.
`Since 1875 there has been established and maintained an
`International Bureau of Weights and Measures. with head-
`quarters at Paris. This Bureau is managed by an interna-
`tional committee on which all civilized countries are repre-
`sented. One object of the committee is to make and provide
`prototypes of the meter and kilogram for the subscribing
`nations: approximately 40 such copies have been prepared.
`The US prototype standards of both the meter and the
`kilogram mass. constructed of a platinum-iridium alloy.
`were brought from Paris in 1890 and are now in the custody
`of the Bureau of Standards at Washington DC. They have
`been reproduced and distributed by our own government to
`the various states having bureaus needing such replicas.
`The original US prototype meter was taken back to Paris in
`195? for reverification and was found to have altered only 3
`parts in 100,000.000 after 67 years of use. Thus. there was
`no demonstrable change within the limits of experimental
`error.
`
`Adoption of the krypton-06 wavelength of light definition
`for the meter gives the different countries the means to
`check their prototype meter bars without returning them to
`Paris at periodic intervals for comparison with the interna-
`tional meter bar.
`
`Orthography and Reading
`
`Orthogranhy—There are two methods of orthography of
`the metric units in use.
`In one of these, the original French,
`the units are spelled metre. litre. gramme; in the other.
`proposed by the American Metric Bureau, the units are
`spelled meter. liter and gram.
`In the USP and NF for three
`decades after the original adoption of the metric system,
`meter and liter were adopted but the French gramme was
`need. Now these official compendia use the spelling gram.
`
`METROLOGY AND CALCLLATHDN
`
`71
`
`Reading—Some difficulty usually is experienced by
`those unfamiliar with the metric system in reading the Quart -
`titles.
`In the linear measures, in pharmacy. centimeters and
`millimeters are used almoot exclusively; thus. 0.05 it: would
`not be read five hundredths of a meter. but 5 centimeters. (5
`cm); if the millimeter column contains a unit. as in 0.05:3 m. it
`is read fifty—five millimeters [55 mm). in preference to fifty-
`five thousandths of a meter.
`Fractions of a millimeter roost he read decimally. as.
`0.0555 to. fifty-five and five-tenths millimeter (55.5 mm)..
`in measures of capacity. cubic centimeters (cc) or milliliters
`lmLJ. are used exclusively for quantities of less than a liter.
`The terms half liter. quarter liter, 100 milliliters and one
`are denoted by 500 mL. 250 ml... 100 mL and 1 mL;
`with water the milliliter is considered equivalent to a gram.
`In weight. when the quantity is relatively large. and in com-
`mercial transactions. the kilogram is abbreviated to kilo.
`when less than a kilogram and not less than a grant. the
`quantity is read with the gram for the unit: 2000 g would be
`read either as two thousand grams or as two kilos. and 543 1;
`would be read five hundred and forty-three grams, while
`2543 g is sometimes read two kilos and five hundred and
`forty-three grams, although twenty-five hundred and forty-
`three grams usually is preferred. For quantities below the
`gram, decigram and centigram usually are not used. but
`milligram has been regarded as the most convenient unit.
`With the increase in the use of extremely small doses of very
`potent drugs and the wide application of more delicate ana-
`lytical procedures. the term microgram (meg. pg. 0r Tl. for
`thousandths of a milligram. is used frequently to designate
`quantities up to 099 ug (less than 1.000 mg).
`Both the metric and English systems of weights and mea-
`sures are in use in the US. even though the metric system
`nearly has replaced the English system; the pharmacist must
`have a practical knowledge of both.
`
`Weights
`
`The Metric System
`
`The USP of 1800 adopted the metric system of weights
`and measures to the exclusion ofall others except for equiva-
`lent dosage statements, and the British Pharmacopoeia of
`191-1 did likewise.
`In 1944 the Council on Pharmacy and
`Chemistry of the American Medical Association adopted the
`metric system exclusively. The advantages of the metric or
`decimal system, and its simplicity. brevity and adaptability
`to everyday needs are now conceded universally.
`Fractional and Multiple Prefixes—In many experi-
`mental procedures, including some in the pharmaceutical
`sciences, very small (and occasionally very large} Quantities
`of weight, length. volume. time, radioactivity. etc are mea-
`sured To avoid the use of numbers with many zeros in such
`cases. the National Bureau of Standards recognises prefixes
`to be used to express fractions or multiples of the Interna-
`tional System of Units (SI) established in 1960 by th Gener-
`al Conference on Weights and Measures {see foregoing dis-
`cussion). The recognized prefixes. which in use are adioined
`to an appropriate unit (as, for example. in such quantities as
`nanogram, picomole. microcurie, microsecond or megavolt)
`are defined in Table I.
`Table ll lists some metric weights. The prefixes. which
`indicate multiples. are of Greek derivation—delta. 10: hecto,
`100; kilo. 1000. Fractions of the units are expressed by
`Latin prefixes—dad, Elm; centi. lime; milli, Ilium.
`Only a few of the most. convenient denominations are
`employed in practical work. Whole numbers from 1 to 1000
`usually are expressed in terms of grams while the kilogram is
`used as the unit for larger quantities. Quantities bemoan l
`milligram and 1 gram usually are referred to in terms of
`
`AstraZencca Exhibit 213 2 p. 9
`
`

`

`72
`
`censure 9
`
`Table l—Prellses lor Fractions and Multiples ol 3| Units
`
`Table \l—-Troy Weight
`
`Fraction
`
`Prone
`
`Symbol
`
`Multiple
`
`Prefix
`
`Symbol
`
`Poms
`
`unless
`
`Pomvwelghlsll’wu
`
`anion
`
`5'100
`400
`gr 24
`
`=
`=
`=
`
`lb 1
`
`=
`
`12
`3 1
`
`=
`=
`
`240
`20
`val. l
`
`Note—The abbreviation It: refers to the swiftlqu [round ul 7000 3|
`Lulless further qualified. as in the headings of Tables IV and V. The soothe-
`canr pound is sometimes abbreviated In.
`
`Table til—Metric Linear Measure
`
`10"
`10"
`10-3
`10‘“
`10"
`'10—“
`10"5
`10'18
`
`deci
`centi
`milli
`micro
`nano
`pica
`femto
`alto
`
`d
`c
`m
`u
`n
`p
`1‘
`a
`
`10
`10E
`1.03
`10°
`10”
`101*
`10'5
`1.015
`
`ticks
`heoto
`kilo
`megs
`giga
`tors
`pets

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket